by James Buchanan. Once again we’re facing the imminent betrayal of the American public by “our” government in the form of Senate Bill 744, which is better described as the 2013 Amnesty Bill. Despite the attempts by Democrats and the Zionist-controlled media to make Amnesty sound inevitable and despite a disgraceful wobbly response by several Republicans, most Americans strongly oppose Amnesty, and we just need to remind politicians not to do this. Perhaps the best way to remind them is to mention what happened to the Republican Amnesty Traitors from 2007. 12 Republicans voted for an Amnesty Bill in 2007, and today only two of them are still in office. (Contact info for the US Senate can be found here.)

Back in 2007, the two-party system tried to shove through an Amnesty Bill for an estimated 20 million illegal aliens. There were violent screams of protest from voters all across America. Some Senators were getting literally several hundred phone calls opposing the bill for every phone call supporting it. The volume and intensity of the response shocked many in the Senate into choosing the wiser course of action for their own preservation and voting down the Amnesty Bill (which stood no chance at all in the House anyway). Still, 46 Senators voted for the Amnesty Bill, completely ignoring the will of the people.

The Senate has betrayed the American people many times before. They completely ignored the will of the people when it came to NAFTA and GATT. It’s a safe bet that every piece of legislation, that’s been passed in the last 24 years, betrays the interests of the American people in favor of special interests. The Amnesty Bill however was an ultimate betrayal which would have greatly accelerated the transformation of America into a Third World nation. Years of betrayal have outraged patriots, who have created the Tea Party movement in response. Most Tea Party supporters don’t want US citizenship to be bestowed on twenty million illegal aliens.

Well, 2010 was payback time for two-out of three Republican Amnesty Traitors running for reelection that year. The first to go was Arlen Specter, who has been a “Republican In Name Only” (RINO) for decades. Specter was chased out of the Republican Party by the Tea Party and then defeated in the Democrat primary. Pennsylvania law forbids primary losers from running in the general election as “Independents” so that primary loss finished off Specter.

Senator Bob Bennett was another long-term incumbent who thought the voters would forget about that Amnesty Bill from 2007. An incumbent Senator will usually demolish his competition with 60 to 80+ percent of the vote in the primary. Bennett however was the one who got demolished placing third with a jaw-dropping 26 percent of the vote in the 2010 GOP primary. Bennett was the first Republican Amnesty traitor who thought he could survive a GOP primary facing the full wrath of the Tea Party.

John McCain ran for reelection in 2010 in an August primary. With the skill of a chameleon changing colors from blue to red, John McCain transformed himself from a whorish crook, who was part of the Keating Five, and from a CO-SPONSOR of the McCain-Kennedy Amnesty Bill into a “respectable” conservative who “never” ever sponsored Amnesty. Remember those hundreds of billions of dollars in TARP bail outs that conservatives vehemently and loudly opposed, which McCain supported anyway. Well, it looks like McCain got plenty of kick backs. McCain spent more than 21 million dollars to buy the GOP primary in 2010 and defeat his Tea Party challenger (but not by much).

An article by Michelle Malkin notes “Hayworth was far from a perfect candidate. But there is no bigger clown, charlatan, and huckster Republican serving on Capitol Hill than four-term, 24-year Big Government fixture John McCain. After burning through a whopping $21 million in campaign funds to hold on to his seat, McCain is poised to claim a primary election victory over Hayworth tonight. Some victory. To stave off Hayworth, the reborn conservative McCain not only had to throw $21 million down the drain. He had to thrown his own old ‘maverick’ self off the bus, start talking like Tom Tancredo, appear on cable news non-stop, disavow all his good friends in the ‘Eastern press’ whose approbation (praise) he thrives on in off-election years, and pander shamelessly to the grass-roots conservative base that he has despised, undermined, and spurned for more than two decades.”

Three Republican Amnesty Traitors (including Richard Lugar) were defeated in their primaries and seven more were compelled to resign facing strong primary challenges from the Tea Party. Don’t believe any claims that these Republicans wanted to retire. Just think of Ted Kennedy, Richard Byrd, Strom Thurmond and most recently Frank Lautenberg, who all died of old age in office. Most of the people in the Senate want to stay there for life. 22 Senators are over 70 years old. 57 Senators are over 60 years old.

Feel free to call your Senators (especially the Republican ones) and tell them that 10 out of 12 Republican Senators, who were Amnesty Traitors in 2007, no longer have their jobs. The American public has NOT changed its mind about Amnesty, but we will change our mind about any Senators, who try to betray us on this issue. You can go here to find contact info for your Senators.

Here is the link to Dr. Duke’s Introduction of his new book:

The Secret Behind Communism!

The book should be available for purchase within two weeks!

Writing in an op-ed piece in the Israeli news service YnetNews, Israeli-born but US resident attorney Shoula Romano Horing, who teaches law at Baker University and the Webster University and who regularly is involved in campaigning for the Israeli government in Israel, said “Israel and the US’s best strategy should be to help maintain the status quo where neither Assad nor the rebels are strong enough to defeat the other militarily.”

The article, titled “Assad must not win,” went on to say that:

“neither the Sunni rebels nor the Assad-led Shiites who are involved in the Syrian civil war are friends of the United States or Israel. Israel and the US’s best strategy should be to help maintain the status quo where neither Assad nor the rebels are strong enough to defeat the other militarily.

“In this context, the Obama administration’s decision to finally help arm the rebels was the correct decision… the main reason to heavily arm the rebels should be to counter balance Hezbollah and Iranian involvement and reverse recent Assad territorial gains in the strategic city of Qusair on the border of Syria and Lebanon, which has served as the rebels’ supply corridor from Lebanon.

“It must be clear that both the US and Israel’s strategic interests would be compromised if the Americans allow Assad and his allies to win.

“While the Assad regime has conventional military superiority including jets, ballistic missiles, and artillery, it also can count on a steady supply of arms and ammunition from loyal allies such as Iran and Russia.

“If Assad wins, the US will lose the remainder of its credibility and its deterrence power in the Middle East….Iran will become stronger than ever. A weakened Assad will owe everything to Iran, and become its puppet.

“Hezbollah will become stronger by sharing Syria’s dangerous arsenal and by influencing a weakened Assad to be more militant against Israel. Syria’s last war against Israel was in 1973, but since then Israel has had at least two wars with Hezbollah.

“An Assad win over the rebels will unravel decades of American influence in the Middle East and endanger Israel in the process.”

Horing is no minor player in the Zionist Supremacist conspiracy.  According to her own biography, she is a a national speaker for the United Jewish Communities, and has been a keynote speaker at many rallies for Israel.

Since 2005, she has been a national speaker for JNF educating about Israel and the “Negev Blueprint’ to flourish the desert.  In addition she has been raising funds to send to JNF’s summer camps for Israeli children.

For  10 years, she was the host of a weekly radio show called ”Oh Jerusalem”, which aired on KCXL in Kansas City, Missouri. On the show she discussed political and cultural issues concerning Israel and the Middle East. She has interviewed many guests including  Prime Ministers Yitzhak Shamir, and Ehud Olmert, Mr. Bassiouni, ex Egyptian Ambassador to Israel,  Walter Rodgers, ex- CNN Bureau Chief Correspondent in Jerusalem, Sam Brownback, Kansas US senator, Kit Bond,  Missouri US Senator, former US Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich and  former Senate Majority Leader, Trent Lott.

In February,2009, Horing came to Israel to campaign and vote  for the election of the Likud candidate for Prime, Minister Bibi Netanyahu. As a child, Shoula’s parents took her to political rallies for then “Herut” leader, Menachem Begin. When she was 20, she gave a speech about the peace treaty between Israel with Egypt, at the party’s convention, in front of then Prime Minister Menachem Begin and thousands of other delegates and was elected to be a member of the “Herut” Central Committee.

He comments on the Syrian situation are therefore likely to be representative of Zionist thinking on the issue, and confirm what Dr David Duke has been saying all along: that the Zionist game plan is to divide and conquer its foes.

David Duke Commentary — True to his Zionist masters, Obama announced today that America would start sending destructive weapons to the terrorists who are waging war on one of Israel’s biggest enemies: Syria.

To illustrate Obama’s treason, even members of the National Security Agency have admitted that al Qaeda is involved in the war against Syria. So now we are going to send weapons of war that will undoubtedly get into the hands of America’s supposed mortal enemy, Al Qaeda, the same terrorist organization blamed by the government for 911.

But when Jewish extremists control America, even the most insane policies make sense. Because, Zionist interests and Israeli interests are literally opposite of that of the United States.

A perfect illustration of that principle is Netanyahu’s quick gut response to the horrific 911 attack. The NY Times James Bennett reported that he said:

 “It’s very good,” ”Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.” [for Israel]

The truth is that Netanyahu and the Zionist fanatics love al Qaeda and they love 911 and they love any and all terrorism against America because their Jewish controlled media can direct American anger against the enemies of Israel rather than the true enemies of America.

One of those true enemies of America is Israel which had to admit that its operatives made a false flag terrorist attack against the United States in the Lavon Affair. Israel also attacked the USS Liberty killing 34 Americans and wounding 171. Both the U.S. Secretary of State, Dean Rusk, and our top military man, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff maintained that the attack was clearly a deliberate attack on our country from Israel, and Jewish spy Jonathan Pollard did more damage to America than any spy in the History of America.

Israel’s three top enemies are Syria, Lebanon and Iran. Destroying Syria is a key Israeli objective, as it will also weaken Hezbollah which defeated Israel during the last Zionist invasion of Lebanon.

In order to justify the intervention in Syria, the Zionist controllers and their puppets in the White House have resorted to the tried and tested lies about “weapons of mass destruction.” This time, they have claimed, Syria is using “poison gas”–but this was exactly what they said about Saddam Hussein and his mythological “weapons of mass destruction” before the invasion of that nation.

Another fact which the Zionist puppet masters cannot stomach is the reality that Assad is, contrary to their Jewish Supremacist-controlled media image, actually quite popular among Syrians. This is so particularly among the female and Christian elements of that population, two groups which enjoy great freedom compared to some other stricter Islamic states in the Middle East.

Yet it is precisely this relatively secular, and until the foreign radical invasion, peaceful, nation which Obama and his Zionist masters now wish to see destroyed.

The latest actions show that there will never be true peace in the world until the Zionist threat is removed.

According to that website, the ideology of Zionist Supremacism “threatens not only the Palestinian people, but also the entire world through its control of many European or majority European nations—America, Britain and others—which in turn drives numerous illegal wars, economic exploitation and many other crimes.

“Until the world understands, and deals with, extremist Zionist Supremacism, world peace and stability will hang in the balance.

“A small number of ethnic Jews have courageously stood up against Jewish tribalism and racism, not simply the Zionist crimes of the Israeli state. This is because they understand that Jewish racism and tribalism is what make Zio-globalism and the Zionist state possible.”

The site appears to draw its information from a number of different sources, and also contains a link to a bookshop which stocks many hard-to-find works.

This site deserves the support of all genuine anti-Zionists from around the world.

Visit Ziowiki here.

The article—which is Jewish chtuzpah exemplified—appeared in the Israeli news service Ynet news under the title “Israel losing America.”

Haber is one of Israel’s leading journalists and was a close associate of former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. He served as media adviser to Rabin and wrote most of his speeches. As a Jewish Agency board member, Haber is a key player in the Zionist state and its tentacles across the globe.

In the article, Haber writes that “A Jew in the Land of Israel goes to sleep at night with at least one thing not to be concerned about: He knows that the United States – the great America – always stands by Israel. And he knows that as long as this great world power stands by us, we have nothing to worry about, at least in terms of international support.

 “One hundred and ninety countries envy the special relations between Washington and Jerusalem.

“And we, our lives very much depend on the man sitting in the house on 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, and he is the one who makes sure that we have wheat to bake our bread and he is the one who sends us F-16 jets so that we can sleep peacefully. America is with us,” Haber said.

“The good relations with America improved over the years, and in the days of Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush they reached unbelievable heights.

“If the forms of ties between Washington and Jerusalem are ever revealed, the world will be flabbergasted.

“Yet the heads of the government in Israel always made certain to maintain the relations and ensure that they are not a passing dream.

“We’ve already had American presidents whose telephone operator at the White House was the only person that could be reached, and that is the nightmare of every Israeli prime minister.”

Haber goes on to bemoan the fact that this total control appears to be slipping of late, and in doing so, reveals just how closely American policy is determined by the Jewish lobby.

“In recent years, the US map of interests in the Middle East is changing. The American interest in our region is decreasing, not to mention the fact that the US is getting rid of the dependence on Middle Eastern oil. We are losing the special status of the eldest and spoilt child in the eyes of the White House.

“To put it explicitly, the current president (and the next president, whoever that may be) no longer “works for us” and is increasingly returning to the format of the “problem child.” To put it in our words, it seems that we have burnt our dish in the kitchens of the White House and Capitol Hill. They are getting increasingly tired of our conduct.

“We always have good answers to the American conduct: Look, listen, they’re unfazed. What can you do, that’s how our friends overseas are: Unfazed. But we receive the small answers from Washington both in leaks from the White House, including the president’s statements, and in appointments of senior officials who directly influence the US policy.

“Many of those recent appointments are not fond of us, to put it mildly. Even US Jews, especially the young ones, no longer obey every single command coming from Jerusalem.

“And so we are slowly losing hold of the source of our life, thousands of miles from home. That may not be so crucial at the moment, but if and when it becomes crucial, it will be too late to wake up.”

In France the situation is even more devastating, the entire political system is hijacked by the forceful CRIF.

But in case anyone fails to grasp why the Jewish Lobby is pushing for an immediate intervention, Debka, an Israeli news outlet provides the answer. Seemingly, the Syrian army is winning on all fronts. Israel’s military and geo-political calculations are proved to be wrong.

According to Debka, “the battle for Damascus is over”. The Syrian army had virtually “regained control of the city in an epic victory”. The rebels, largely mercenaries, have lost the battle they “can’t do much more than fire sporadically. They can no longer launch raids, or pose threats to the city center, the airport or the big Syrian air base nearby.?The Russian and Iranian transports constantly bringing replenishment for keeping the Syrian army fighting can again land at Damascus airport after months of rebel siege.”

But it isn’t just the capital. Debka reports that “Hezbollah and Syrian units have tightened their siege on the rebels holding out in the northern sector of al Qusayr; other (Syrian army) units have completed their takeover of the countryside around the town of Hama; and a third combined Syrian-Hizballah force has taken up positions around Aleppo.”

Debka maintains that senior IDF officers criticized the Israeli defense minister (Moshe Ya’alon) who “mislead” the Knesset a few days ago estimating that “Bashar Assad controlled only 40% of Syrian territory.” Debka suggests that Israeli defense Minister drawn on a “flawed intelligence assessment and were concerned that the armed forces were acting on the basis of inaccurate intelligence.” Debka stresses, “erroneous assessments… must lead to faulty decision-making.”

Debka is clearly brave enough to admit that Israeli military miscalculations may have lead to disastrous consequences. It reports, “the massive Israeli bombardment of Iranian weapons stored near Damascus for Hezbollah, turned out a month later to have done more harm than good. It gave Bashar Assad a boost instead of weakening his resolve.”

Debka is obviously correct. It doesn’t take a genius to predict that an Israeli attack on an Arab land cannot be accepted by the Arab masses, not even by Assad’s bitterest Arab opponents.

Debka maintains that the “intelligence focus on military movements in Syria especially around Damascus to ascertain that advanced missiles and chemical weapons don’t reach Hezbollah laid to a failure of in detecting major movement by Hezbollah militia units towards the Syrian-Israeli border.”

Israel is now facing a new reality. It is facing Hezbollah reinforcements streaming in from Lebanon towards the Golan heights and its border with Syria.

Israel, Debka concludes, will soon find itself “face to face for the first time with Hezbollah units equipped with heavy arms and missiles on the move along the Syrian-Israeli border and manning positions opposite Israel’s Golan outposts and villages.”

Debka is correct to suggest that instead of “growing weaker, Iran’s Lebanese proxy is poised to open another warfront and force the IDF to adapt to a new military challenge from the Syrian Golan.”

Rather than The Guardian or the Le Monde, it is actually the Israeli Debka that helps us to grasp why Britain and France are so desperate to intervene. Once again, it is a Zionist war which they are so eager to fight.

Sadly enough, it isn’t The Guardian or The New York Times that is there to reveal the latest development in Syria and expose Israeli lethal miscalculations. It is actually a ‘Zionist’ Israeli patriotic outlet that is providing the good. I actually believe that this form of harsh self-criticism that is embedded in Israeli culture, is the means that sustains Israeli regional hegemony, at least monetarily. This ability to critically examine and disapprove your own leadership is something I fail to encounter in Western media. Seemingly, the media in Israel is far more tolerant toward criticism than the Zionist dominated Media in the West.

Original article.

Prof. Jeremy A. Rabkin of George Mason University and Prof. Avi Bell of the University of San Diego have both claimed that Israel has a “legal claim” to the Palestinian land.

Speaking during a conference sponsored by the Bar-Ilan University’s Faculty of Law on “International Law and Israel,” the two “American” professors sad that “Israel has a very good case regarding its sovereignty in Judea and Samaria and should not accept its classification as ‘occupier.’”

According to articles in the official Israeli National News, the recently concluded conference is the “first in a series of annual conferences aimed at exploring the growing gap between international law as it is often applied to Israel vs. how it is understood in the rest of the world.”

The conference examined “the various claims of Arab groups, including the Palestinian Authority, versus the rights of Israel to the land liberated [sic] in the 1967 Six Day War.”

Judea and Samaria is the official Israeli term corresponding to the territory usually referred to as the West Bank, which has never been part of Israel and , but excluding East Jerusalem.

The United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181 (II) Future Government of Palestine, adopted in 1947, referred to “Samaria and Judea” as part of a proposed Arab state to be carved out of the Mandate of Palestine.

After the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Jordan in 1949, renamed the area on the west bank under its control following the cessation of hostilities the “West Bank” to distinguish it from the rest of the kingdom, which falls on the Jordan River’s east bank.

The area was captured from Jordan by Israel in the 1967Six-Day War and has remained under Zionist occupation ever since.

It is this area which is the focus of the illegal Israel settlement program, designed to expand Israel’s borders and ethnically cleanse Palestine of the last of the Palestinians.

Professor Rabkin teaches constitutional law and international law and in 2001 was awarded the title of “Cornell’s Most Influential Teacher.”

He is also a board member of the United States Institute of Peace—a supposedly “non-partisan, independent, federal institution that works to prevent, mitigate, and resolve violent conflict around the world.” It was established by an act of U.S. Congress that was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan in 1984.

Rabkin’s claims that Israel has a legal right to the West Bank are, of course, in direct contradiction to the supposed aims of this taxpayer-funded organization on whose board he sits.

Professor Bell is another open single-loyalty Zionist Supremacist who works for the University of San Diego School of Law and the Israeli Bar-Ilan University.

If there was no “dual loyalty”—or, more accurately, single loyalty—then why on earth would conscription in Israel cause a hundred thousand Jews to take part in an “anti-conscription” protest in America, on the other side of the globe?

Would, for example, Catholics in Buenos Aries turn out to protest conscription in Austria?

Would Anglicans in Australia turn out to protest conscription in Britain?

Would Lutherans in America turn out to protest conscription in Germany?

So why do orthodox Jews turn out to protest conscription in Israel?  The only possible reason for this behavior can be that their true loyalty—the place they really regard as “home”—is to Israel, and not to the host nation upon which they have fastened themselves.

According to an article in the Israel Ynetnews Service, some 100,000 ultra-Orthodox Jews took part in a mass rally in Manhattan’s Foley Square to protest Israel’s plan to conscript haredim (orthodox Jews) to the Israeli Defense Force. A march held prior to the protest drew tens of thousands of yeshiva students who wore baggy clothes.

Some 2,000 rabbis sat on special platform and 300 NYPD policemen secured the event.

The event was also broadcast live “giving other Satmar Hasidim the chance to participate from afar” YnetNews said, meaning that it was not just New York Jews who participated in the protest.

Since the founding of the State of Israel in 1948, many Haredi, orthodox Jews have refused to serve in the Israeli military for religious reasons.

Typically, they study Torah in Yeshivas, and as such are legally exempt from military service.

Recently, the Israeli government has decided to abolish this special privilege granted to the ultra religious Jews, and started conscripting them into the army.

If Jews living in New York were truly “American” then this change in law would surely not affect them to this degree—but it does, and as such, reveals conclusively that they have a single loyalty—to Israel and themselves, above all others.

Writing on his blog, Mr Atzmon—who served in the Israeli army before defecting from the Zionist Supremacist state—said that the “London Statement is a clear attempt to stop discussion on issues to do with Jewish past, the Holocaust, the Jewish State and its Jewish nature.

“The declaration doesn’t leave much room for doubt, Israel and its Lobby are in a state of panic.  The London Statement is a clear attempt to stop discussion on issues to do with Jewish past, the Holocaust, the Jewish State and its Jewish nature.

“Interestingly enough, the declaration provides us with an insight into Zionist projection. Far from being a universal statement, the declaration is primarily concerned with anti-Jewish discrimination. The declaration is a brutal and crude attempt to interfere with freedom of expression that is still regarded by some as a precious human value.

“The declaration is full with logical flaws. Here is one example. Though Israel defines itself as the Jewish State, the declaration calls to stop those who “target the State of Israel as a Jewish collectivity” (1). I guess that the meaning of it is simple. Israel is happy to define itself as a Jewish State but it doesn’t like to be defined as such by others.

“The declaration calls ‘national governments, parliaments, international institutions… to affirm democratic and human values, build societies based on respect and citizenship and combat any manifestations of antisemitism and discrimination.’  I would expect the Israeli Government to follow this call and to make sure that Israel, once and for all, becomes a ‘state of its citizens’ and succumb to principles of ‘human values’ and true democracy, because at the moment Israel is still a ‘Jewish State’ and its legal system discriminates non-Jews.

“The declaration is an attempt to seal Jewish past ‘Governments must challenge any foreign leader, politician or public figure who denies, denigrates or trivialises the Holocaust.’ It is obviously clear that some Jews don’t like it when gentiles look into their past.  But the question is why? Is there something secretive in Jewish past? The declaration also fails to define exactly what denial, denigration or trivialization may entail.

“I guess that the desperate appeal to law and international community is taking place now because Israel and its supporters grasp that the tide has changed. -resentment towards Israel and its lobbies cannot be contained anymore.

“I guess that Israel and its Lobby better learn to self-reflect rather than attempting to silence criticism,” he concluded.

Original article (and the text of the London Declaration) here.

In an interview with the Jewish media outlet, The Times of Israel, Deputy Defense Minister Danny Danon said that “Israel’s ruling party and the governing coalition are staunchly opposed to a two-state solution and would block the creation of a Palestinian state if such a proposal ever came to a vote.”

Danon’s unequivocal statement—unusual for the Zionist Supremacist double-talkers—means that the “left wing” Zionist apologists and their apologists who argue that a “two state solution” is on the cards, are either part of a conspiracy of lies or that they are incredibly stupid.

It is unlikely that they are incredibly stupid, as the facts of the situation in Palestine today—and for the past several decades—all indicate that no Zionist government has ever actually allowed to make progress towards a “two state” solution.

As Danon was quoted in the Times of Israel: “Look at the government: there was never a government discussion, resolution or vote about the two-state solution.

“If you will bring it to a vote in the government — nobody will bring it to a vote, it’s not smart to do it — but if you bring it to a vote, you will see the majority of Likud ministers, along with the Jewish Home [party], will be against it.”

Danon added that the only reason why the Israeli government ever bothered calling for peace talks with the Palestinians was because they knew that there never would an agreement.

According to the Times of Israel, Danon said “Netanyahu calls for peace talks despite his government’s opposition because he knows Israel will never arrive at an agreement with the Palestinians.

“Today we’re not fighting it [Netanyahu’s declared goal of a Palestinian state], but if there will be a move to promote a two-state solution, you will see forces blocking it within the party and the government,” Danon said.

The deputy minister said “there is no majority for a two-state solution” among the 31 lawmakers that make up the Likud-Yisrael Beytenu Knesset faction.

The Likud party’s central committee, about 10 years ago, passed a motion against the creation of a Palestinian state, Danon said, adding that “legally” the party was opposed to the concept of two states for two people.

In other words, the only reason why the Zionists even call for talks with the Palestinians is because they know that they will never reach any permanent settlement—and that it is just a blind to try and deflect attention away from the fact that the Palestinians have been robbed of their land and possessions.

The methodology used to seize Palestinian land has been outlined in a new article in the anti-Zionist Jewish publication +972 Magazine (which is run by Palestinians and dissident Israelis) titled “After 46 years of occupation, land confiscation renders Israeli law obsolete.”

Image: A member of the Ghaith family stands among the rubble of his house after it was demolished by Israeli authorities in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of At Tur on April 29, 2013.

According to that article, since “Israel occupied the West Bank and annexed East Jerusalem in 1967, it has continued to engage in legal acrobatics to confiscate Palestinian homes and land. In doing so, the state is actively erasing its internationally recognized border – the Green Line.

“One thing has become abundantly clear about Israeli policy when it comes to land: first it acts, only later giving its legal stamp of approval. This is essentially how the state was first established and built itself up, and is the story of how all settlements are born to this day in the West Bank and East Jerusalem,” the article continues.

“Make your presence known on a piece of land for long enough, get a trailer, set up a makeshift synagogue, wait until the state provides electricity and water and it is only a matter of time before it is recognized, de facto or officially. The chances that a court will order that an outpost-turned-settlement be removed are very slim (and even slimmer that the state will enforce such a legal decision), as is evident from the half-a-million settlers who live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem today, and the 100 or so outposts that are considered illegal even under Israeli law.

“Does it really matter, therefore, what the courts, the attorney general or the High Court of Justice have to say about it, one way or another. For on the one hand, they are committed to the ethics of law, but on the other hand, are bodies that serve a state which prioritizes Jewish rights in every aspect of life.

“Israel’s High Court recently asked Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein to explain his stance on the state’s confiscation of Palestinian land in East Jerusalem. His answer was that it is a-okay.  The 1950 Absentee Property Law was designed to give the state the legal tools to confiscate Palestinian refugees’ property. The refugees, from the 1948 war, were literally ‘absent’ from their homes at the time – a very fitting criteria considering it was a time of war, during which people fled and were forced out.

“The way Israel uses the law is kind of like stealing someone’s seat if they get up for a second to go to the bathroom. The state takes advantage of a vulnerable moment in time to claim something as their own – forever. It’s not that Israel has any more of a legal right to that seat, it just seized the opportunity and then decided to build a legal framework to justify it. Israel’s obvious political ambitions in East Jerusalem make the legal aspect of such confiscation totally arbitrary in nature. Does it matter whether or not it is deemed legal or not? The fact is Israel is taking over more and more Palestinian land, for use by Jews.

“This is why two former attorneys general ruled that the law specifically cannot be applied in East Jerusalem. In the eastern half of the city, which was a contiguous part of the West Bank until 1967, the lines between modern day Greater Jerusalem and the West Bank are arbitrary.  Many Palestinians who were living in the West Bank and owned property in East Jerusalem could not be present to maintain their ownership.

“Despite these legal opinions, given in 1968 and in 2005, and the 1970 amendment to the law limiting its application in East Jerusalem, the legal confiscation goes on. A large portion of today’s Jewish settlement in Sheikh Jarrah, Silwan and the Muslim Quarter of the Old City was made possible over the last 30 years through the Absentee Property Law.”

This tactic—of first covertly infiltrating Palestinian land, then building up a power base which becomes formally recognized, and then final open administrative takeover and incorporation into the Zionist state—is exactly the formula that Jewish extremists have seized control of America and other western nations.

First they quietly took over the major media institutions—newspapers and the movie industry, employing deception and subtlety, most evidence by their endless name-changing tactics designed to hide their Jewish identity.

Once the media and Hollywood was in their hands, they could influence the political process by either denying publicity to candidates and policy positions which went against their racial agenda, or conversely by promoting those candidates and policies which supported Jewish Supremacy.

Once this process was complete—and it took decades to achieve—then the pretence could be dropped and Jewish Supremacists could openly operate in positions of power in government and the media under their own names—in effect the formal recognition and takeover stage used to seize Palestinian lands.

Militant Muslims and Palestinians who are rightly angry at their dispossession and Israel’s murderous aggression should always bear this in mind: America and other western nations are as much Zionist Supremacist-occupied territory as the West Bank or Gaza—and that the common enemy which oppresses all people is one and the same: Jewish Supremacism.

Only by uniting, and not falling into the Jewish Supremacist trap of divide-and-conquer, will we together be able to overcome this single greatest threat to all mankind.

Uniting in this struggle will require compromises from all sides and an acceptance of the right to each and every people rto maintain their identity and culture, free from outside domination.

This means that those Muslims and people from other lands who rightfully demand the right to rule themselves in their own lands, must also grant that same right to the European,  Asian, African—and all other peoples.

Once all the nations of the world have unified around this basic principle, the Zionist nightmare will be at an end.

]]> http://www.davidduke.com/?feed=rss2&p=39908 0 http://www.davidduke.com/?p=39903 http://www.davidduke.com/?p=39903#comments Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:56:28 +0000 Administrator http://www.davidduke.com/?p=39903 The existence of a “Jewish lobby” (in those words)—which is always denied by Jewish Supremacist groups such as the ADL and SPLC—has been confirmed once again by the Israeli media, where the term is regularly used to describe Jewish Supremacist power in America.

The latest use of the term has come with an article which appeared in the Israeli YnetNews service discussing the appointment of Samantha Power to the position of US ambassador to the United Nations.

Power, an Irish-born native, is married to prominent Jewish Supremacist Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School Cass Sunstein (who also previously served as Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the first Obama administration and who is a “a friend of Obama dating back to their days on the University of Chicago Law School faculty.”)

Despite this strong Jewish connection to Power, the Ynet News article—typical for the Jewish-centric media which always obsesses over the tiniest reference to Jews and Israel—tries to make out that the new ambassador candidate is somehow anti-Semitic for making what are fairly low-key and leftist Zionist remarks on the Palestinian question in 2002.

The article, quite falsely titled “Obama’s UN nominee advocated invasion of Israel” claims that Power said that the “US should impose solution on Israel, Palestinians” and “advocated deployment of massive military force in Israel.”

The Ynet article then went on to casually admit the existence of the Jewish lobby in the following sentence:

“Alluding to the Jewish lobby, she said such an undertaking would ‘mean alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import.’”

Quite apart from the utterly misleading headline—Power never advocated an “invasion” of Israel, merely stepped up pressure to create a two-state solution (as can be seen in the video of the interview below), the casual reference to the “Jewish lobby” as a fact is directly contrary to the efforts of Jewish Supremacist propagandists who are always denying that it even exists.

ADL director Abraham Foxman has even written a book titled “The Deadliest Lie: The Israel Lobby and the Myth of Jewish Control” as part of the Jewish Supremacists’ ongoing campaign to try and cover up the blatantly obvious Zionist extremist control over US domestic and foreign policy.

Power, for her part, merely said what everyone in DC actually already knows that the Jewish lobby is powerful politically and financially, and going against their agenda for Israel and the Middle East means coming up against them.

Even her solution—that of imposing a two state solution—ignores the reality pointed out by Gilad Atzmon and others that Tel Aviv and all of Israel is built on occupied Palestinian land.

Power was, until earlier this year, senior director for multilateral affairs and human rights on the national security staff  at the White House, and was best known for earlier calling Hilary Clinton a “monster” and for advocating US intervention in the Libyan uprising against Gadaffi.

Powers’ exact comments on Israel read as follows: Asked how she would advise the president to address the situation, she replied, “What we need is a willingness to put something on the line in helping the situation. It may mean investing billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel’s military, but actually investing in the new state of Palestine, in investing the billions of dollars in what will have to be a mammoth protection force.”

Despite all of this, Power is now marked out as a potential “anti-Semite” and it is likely that Republicans in the Senate—where her nomination to UN Ambassador still has to be approved—will “ likely to give her a rough confirmation hearing,” according to the Ynet News article.

What that actually means is that the Republican party is even more slavishly pro-Israel than even the Democrats.

The internal politicking aside—because after all it is just the same old story of Jewish extremist control of the US political process, merely with different puppets playing out their roles—the open admission that there is a Jewish Lobby by the Jewish media confirms once again the accuracy of what Dr. David Duke and others have been warning about: that there can be no peace or stability until the power of Jewish extremism, racism, and supremacism is addressed.

But there is more to the secret, and that is the genocidal legacy of the early Bolshevik state. The forced collectivization of agriculture was the direct cause of a man-made, man-enforced famine that cost the lives of millions of peasants, mainly in the Ukraine. The 1920s was an era of relative calm following the bloody revolution and subsequent Russian Civil War. A “New Economic Policy” (NEP) restored a far degree of economic freedom to farmers and shopkeepers, resulting in a revival of living standards. However, in the second half of the decade a debate raged between the right wing and left wing of the Communist Party. (“Right wing Communists” may sound oxymoronic to American ears, but these were the labels used.) The right wanted to continue policies favoring agriculture and light industry, while the left wanted to extract as much as possible from the peasants in order to build the heavy industries necessary for war. Tellingly, the sides in the debate were drawn largely along ethnic lines.

Former Princeton Professor Stephen F. Cohen is an American Jewish academic who specializes in this period of Russian history. This is how he described the opposing sides in his biography of non-Jewish Bolshevik revolutionary Nikolai Bukharin:

“Three other features future distinguished the Politburo Right. In contrast to the predominantly Jewish Left and the increasingly Transcaucasian complexion of Stalin’s group, all of its major and second-rank leaders were Russians….But the seemingly probably was not always the case. During the ascendancy of the Politburo Right, for example, non-Russian nationalities enjoyed their greatest freedom under Soviet rule. The second feature was particularly striking in contrast to Stalin: Bukharin, Rykov, and Tomskii had reputations as popular Bolshevik leaders.” 

“[T]he Politburo Right’s third political distinction: the great support their leadership obtained in Commissariats (particularly Agriculture, Finance, Labor, and Trade) and other state organs (the Supreme Economic Council, the State Bank, and Gosplan [the state economic planning agency]) responsible for preparing and administering economic policy. These institutions, by nature sympathetic to the return to orthodox economic practices, and with their importance revived by NEP, were staffed largely by former anti-Bolshevik intellectuals, so called nonparty specialists. In particular, both former Mensheviks working in the Supreme Economic Council and Gosplan and Socialist Revolutionaries in the Commissariat of Agriculture strongly preferred Bukarin and Rykov as party leaders to either Stalin or the Left.”

– from Stephen F. Cohen: Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution: A Political Biography, 1888-1938 (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1980), pp. 232-233.

The greatest tragedy of Soviet History, and perhaps the entire history of the 20th Century, is that this predominantly Jewish Left won its struggle against the ethnic Russian right, which had much more support from the people and also from the intellectuals and nonparty specialists responsible for the economic restoration. For the details on the calamity that followed, please refer to Dr. Duke’s forthcoming book.

In summation, not only was the Bolshevik Revolution largely a Jewish affair, but the greatest crime committed by the Bolsheviks was engineered and carried out by the Jewish faction over the opposition of the ethnic Russian faction.

This is perhaps my best and I think most moving radio show ever. I discuss the greatest mass murder in the history of mankind, a decades long murderous rampage that killed more people than the total all the other massacres in world history.

One created and orchestrated by Jewish tyrants.

I also quote Solzhenitsyn in this program showing the racist motivation of the Jewish murderers against the Russian and other European peoples.

This is a show to save, make discs of, make videos out of!

I also quote Jewish publications admitting the paramount Jewish role in all of this murder against our race!

And I show that unless we learn the truth of this, unless every European people learns it, this is the horrific fate toward which we and our children will suffer.

Dr. Duke “The Secret Behind Communism” Radio Show with Dr. Patrick Slattery