Obama the Lame Duck

by Jeff Davis

More and more it’s looking like we may be able to at least turn Obama into a lame duck if not expel him from office after the November elections.

The U. K. Financial Times reports: “Barack Obama’s Democratic party faces a series of dramatic defeats at every level of government in Washington and beyond in the November midterm elections, according to leading analysts and opinion polls. The University of Virginia’s widely monitored Crystal Ball will on Wednesday forecast sweeping setbacks on Capitol Hill and the loss of a clutch of state governorships on November 2. It follows a Gallup poll that showed the Republicans with a 10 percentage point lead over the Democrats – the widest margin in 68 years. Separately, a University of Buffalo paper has predicted a 51-seat gain for Republicans in November.”

Long time liberal extremist Senator Barbara Boxer will likely be defeated by the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard, Carly Fiorina according to the latest poll by SurveyUSA. Rand Paul holds a 15 percent lead over the Democrat in his race to be a Senator from Kentucky. And Tea Party candidate Sharon Angle has gone from being an unknown to a tie with Democrat Senate majority (for now) leader Harry Reid.

The Financial Times goes on: “The numbers, which threaten Mr Obama with a ‘wave election’ similar to those of 1994 and 2006, when Democrats wrested back control of the House after 12 years, also extend to key states. According to local polls, Democrats are on course to lose the governorships of traditionally left-leaning states such as Michigan and Pennsylvania and may be vulnerable in Illinois, long a party bastion.”

Illinois of course is about to go completely bankrupt, thanks to Democrat bungling. Ex-governor Blagojevich was convicted of lying to federal investigators, and faces a retrial on corruption charges.

The article notes “Such is the scale of the expected losses that analysts are already focused on how Mr Obama can turn Republican domination to his advantage in his 2012 re-election race. Washington is awash with speculation on whether the Republicans will over-reach as Mr Gingrich did in 1995 when Bill Clinton won a stand-off that had resulted in the shutdown of government.”

Some folks fear that after losing the November election, the Democrats will hold a kamikaze session of Congress to pass an Amnesty Bill for the 30 million illegal aliens living in this country right now and give them the vote by 2012. While the Democrats, who just got voted out of office, would be all for this, the Democrats and Republicans, who still need to rely on White votes to get elected in future elections will probably not want to go along with such a vote. Even John McCain, who recently promised his primary voters that he would be tough on illegals, would not vote for an Amnesty Bill at this time or he would most certainly face a recall.

Another danger will be that Obama might try to rule by Executive Order. The Clintonistas made such a threat back in 1994 which came to nothing.

The Republicans will be powerless to repeal the obscene and deranged Obamacare law while Obama himself continues to squat in the Oval Office, but they could effectively stop-punch it by refusal to fund it, just like both Bush and Obama have refused to fund the border fence that was passed with such hoopla all those years ago. (About 12 miles of fence have actually been built since the project was defunded by Congress.)

On the upside, the Republican majority will have subpoena power and can provide the nation with endless hours of amusement investigating and humiliating the Democrats. Look for Congressman Darrell Issa from California to head up the festivities.

For Those Who Don’t fully comprehend the Powerful Role of Jewish Supremacists in the Change of American Immigration Policy!

This chapter only deals with their direct role in the government process. It doesn’t deal with their prominent role in media promotion of immigration, and in their incredible ability to influence Gentile politicians through both money and media. They have the power to bankroll a favorable politician or blackmail him by threatening to support his opponent. In addition, Jewish-owned media can be laudatory to a politician they like, or be relentless in criticism of one that doesn’t go along with their agenda. For more, Read Jewish Supremacism and My Awakening. (Spoken chapter: Download MP3)

Chapter 13: The Jewish Led Alien Invasion

Give me your tired, your huddled masses,
Yearning to breathe free.
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
— Emma Lazarus

The influx of Europeans into North America led the Indian populations to displacement and eventually to consignation on reservations. Similarly, relentless Jewish immigration into Palestine was against the interests of the Palestinian people, but it was necessary for the Jewish takeover of the region. It laid the foundation for the Zionist State.Any tribe, race or nation desiring to preserve its culture, group interests and sovereignty must preserve its predominant status in the geographic region in which it dwells. Most nations have had a fundamental understanding of that fact from the time of the earliest civilizations, and every modern nation has sought strict control of its borders and immigration.

Most Americans view the Indian historical record of resistance to European colonization as morally justifiable, but in the skewed ethics of today, some find European-American attempts to preserve our unique genes and culture from non-European immigration – morally reprehensible. Nevertheless, despite pervasive propaganda promoting multiculturalism and the media-touted joys of diversity, opinion surveys in America show overwhelming opposition to unrestricted immigration. Similar public sentiment holds true in every European nation.

It was not until the 1965 Immigration Act that the U.S. Congress ignored the majority’s wishes and began a policy that discriminated against potential European immigrants, and encouraged massive non-European immigration. From that time forward, the federal government also showed less willingness to enforce our immigration laws and police our borders. These policies resulted in a flood of non-White immigrants, legal and illegal. Immigration and higher non-White birthrates have transformed the American population from almost 90 percent European in the early 1960s to less than 70 percent at the end of the century. The U.S. Census Bureau has predicted that by the middle of the 21st century, well within the lifetime of many reading these words, European Americans will be a minority in the United States. We are already a minority in most of America’s major cities and will soon be outnumbered in California and Texas. Policies similar to those enacted in the U.S. have introduced large numbers of non-Europeans into Canada; Negroes into Britain; North Africans and Asians into France; Turks into Germany; and a potpourri of alien races into Scandinavia, Spain, and Italy.

As I grew racially aware, it was certainly obvious to me that the new immigration policies of the United States and Europe would greatly damage Western societies. Only a short time after the change in immigration policy, crime problems escalated in all the affected nations. The quality of education suffered and social welfare problems increased. As this planned racial transformation accelerates, these ills will reach catastrophic proportions.

What groups had anything to gain from this demographic Armageddon? The individual foreigners who could benefit from the economic opportunities afforded by the Western societies had little political or economic clout while outside the Western nations. As I looked into the American fight over immigration laws during the last 100 years, the driving force behind opening America’s borders became evident: It was organized Jewry, personified by the poet Emma Lazarus whose lines I quoted to begin the chapter.

By the time I was a junior in high school, I had become convinced that massive non-European immigration poised the greatest short and long-term threat to the America that I loved. I saw that the Immigration Act of 1965, unless repealed, would eventually sound the death knell for my country. Much of the material I read pointed to a long history of organized Jewish efforts to radically change America’s immigration laws. I contacted Drew Smith, an elderly New Orleans attorney who had authored The Legacy of the Melting Pot, and who had already taught me a lot about the immigration issue.[869]

Smith and I met one rainy day after school at the Citizens Council offices. He explained the history of American immigration law. After quoting the Lazarus lines from the base of the Statue of Liberty, he asked me, “Whose interest could have been served in having America flooded with ‘wretched refuse’?” He quickly answered his own question. “It was in the perceived interest of a cohesive people who use racial solidarity like a weapon, a weapon they want only for themselves. The efforts to change the American immigration law and ultimately displace the European majority has been led almost exclusively by Jews.”

Smith explained that Emma Lazarus — like many other immigration activists — was a Jewish partisan who supported the creation of an exclusively Jewish Zionist state in Palestine, but who supported “diversity” for America. He pointed out to me how Jews such as Lazarus have even changed the modern meaning of the Statue of Liberty. The beautiful jade-colored colossus had no original connection with immigration and predated the Ellis Island immigration center. It was a gift from France to commemorate the American Revolution, not to honor the arrival of “wretched refuse” on America’s shores. It is instructive to note that this beautiful statue of European Womanhood faces not to Africa, Asia or South America, but the land where she was born, France and Europe itself.

Emma Lazarus had been best known for her fulminations against Russia’s pogroms following the assassination of Czar Alexander II in 1881. The irony is rich: A Jewish supremacist dedicated to the creation of an elite Jewish State in Palestine was anxious to turn America into a refuge for the castoffs of the world. Drew Smith owned many books on the immigration issue, including some by Jews, in which he had underlined important passages. I borrowed them and passionately delved into them.

Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress led (and still lead) the effort to liberalize American immigration and defeat restrictionist legislation. In 1921, 1924, and 1952, Congress passed legislation that simply attempted to maintain the racial status quo in America. Interestingly enough, even though Anglo Americans were in a vast majority of the American population as well as in Congress, they did not attempt to increase their own percentage of the American population, but simply sought to fairly maintain each group’s status quo. In the early legislative battles, Jews were the leading advocates of open immigration and vehemently opposed legislation that would maintain America as an ethnically European, Christian nation. In the House of Representatives, Adolph Sabath, Samuel Dickstein, and Emanuel Celler led the fight for unrestricted immigration, while in the Senate, Herbert Lehman and in later years Jacob Javits coordinated the effort.

In the early struggles, Representative Leavitt clearly outlined the Jewish involvement in remarks before Congress.

The instinct for national and race preservation is not one to be condemned…. No one should be better able to understand the desire of Americans to keep America American than the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Sabath], who is leading the attack on this measure, or the gentlemen from New York, Mr. Dickstein, Mr. Jacobstein, Mr. Celler, and Mr. Perlman.

They are of the one great historic people who have maintained the identity of their race throughout the centuries because they believe sincerely that they are a chosen people, with certain ideals to maintain, and knowing that the loss of racial identity means a change of ideals. That fact should make it easy for them and the majority of the most active opponents of this measure in the spoken debate to recognize and sympathize with our viewpoint, which is not so extreme as that of their own race, but only demands that the admixture of other peoples shall be only of such kind and proportions and in such quantities as will not alter racial characteristics more rapidly than there can be assimilation as to ideas of government as well as of blood. (Congressional Record, April 12, 1924.)[870]

Sociologist Edward A. Ross, in his influential 1914 book The Old World and the New: The Significance of Past and Present Immigration to the American People, quotes the famous pro-immigration leader Israel Zangwill as suggesting that America is an ideal place to achieve Jewish interests. Ross then bluntly writes about the Jewish influence.

Jews therefore have a powerful interest in immigration policy: Hence the endeavor of the Jews to control the immigration policy of the United States. Although theirs is but a seventh of our net immigration, they led the fight on the Immigration Commission’s bill…. The systematic campaign in newspapers and magazines to break down all arguments for restriction and to calm nativist fears is waged by and for one race. Hebrew money is behind the National Liberal Immigration League and its numerous publications.[871]

In 1924 Congressman Knud Wefald pointed out the Communist ties of many of the Jewish immigrants and stated that many Jews have no sympathy with our old-time American ideals.”

The leadership of our intellectual life in many of its phases has come into the hands of these clever newcomers who have no sympathy with our old-time American ideals … who detect our weaknesses and pander to them and get wealthy through the disservices they render us.

Our whole system of amusements has been taken over by men who came here on the crest of the south and east European immigration. They produce our horrible film stories [and] they write many of the books we read, and edit our magazines and newspapers. (Congressional Record, April 12, 1924.[872]

The last important congressional legislation passed to protect the status quo of America was the Walter-McCarran act of 1952. Congressional opposition was led by the Jewish troika of Celler, Javits, and Lehman. Every major Jewish organization (as well as the Communist Party USA) also lined up to oppose it, including the American Jewish Congress, American Jewish Committee, the ADL, National Council of Jewish Women, and dozens of others. During congressional debate, Francis Walter noted that the only civic organization that opposed the entire bill was the American Jewish Congress. Representative Celler noted that Walter “should not have overemphasized as he did the people of one particular faith who are opposing the bills.” (Congressional Record, April 23, 1952.)[873]

When Jewish Judge Simon Rifkind testified against the bill in joint hearings, he emphasized that in supporting breaking down U.S. immigration law, he represented “the entire body of religious and lay opinion within the Jewish group, religiously speaking, from the extreme right and extreme left.”[874]

It thrilled me to read the courageous remarks of Mississippi Congressman John Rankin during the debate. Today such truthful comments by any elected official would bring a torrent of abuse that few could withstand.

They whine about discrimination. Do you know who is being discriminated against? The white Christian people of America, the ones who created this nation…. I am talking about the white Christian people of the North as well as the South. . . .

Communism is racial. A racial minority seized control in Russia and in all her satellite countries, such as Poland, Czechoslovakia and many other countries I could name.

They have been run out of practically every country in Europe in the years gone by, and if they keep stirring race trouble in this country and trying to force their Communistic program on the Christian people of America, there is no telling what will happen to them here. (Congressional Record, April 23, 1952.)[875]

Finally, in 1965, the goal first advanced by Jewish organizations in the 1880s came to fruition when Congress passed the Immigration Act. It has resulted in immigration becoming 90 percent non-European. America went from an immigration program meant to be proportionately representative to all groups in the United States to one that discriminated against Europeans. As with earlier legislation, Jewish representatives and senators as well as powerful Jewish lobbying organizations led the assault. It succeeded because during the 41 years since 1924, Jewish power had increased dramatically in virtually all spheres of American life.

In 1951 Senator Jacob Javits authored an article called “Let’s Open Our Gates.”[876] that called for massive unrestricted immigration. Javits and Representative Celler figured prominently in the passage of the bill in 1965. Nine years before passage of the 1965 Immigration Act, the American Jewish Congress initially proposed the essential elements of the bill and praised President Eisenhower for his “unequivocal opposition to the national quota system.” In a 1956 editorial they praised him for “courageously taking a stand in advance of even many advocates of liberal immigration policy and embraced a position which had at first been urged by the American Jewish Congress and other Jewish agencies.”[877]

Jewish Motivation Behind Immigration

It would have been stupid and counterproductive for the Jewish organizations that pushed for open borders to admit that they were motivated by interests that conflicted with those of non-Jewish Europeans. They promoted open immigration as “patriotic.” From the early days of the century, they made public pronouncements that multiculturalism and diversity would be beneficial to the United States, cleverly masking their strategic motivations.After the passage of the open immigration statutes of 1965, Jewish authors such as Naomi W. Cohen felt much safer in revealing some of the real Jewish reasons for promoting such policies. She wrote that, beginning with the persecutions in Russia in the 1880s through the Nazi occupation of Europe and into the Cold War tribulations in Eastern Europe, open immigration in Western nations served Jewish interests because “survival often dictated that Jews seek refuge in other lands.”[878] Cohen also wrote that a U.S. internationalist foreign policy serves Jewish interests because “an internationally minded America was likely to be more sensitive to the problems of foreign Jewries”[879] Perhaps even more important, Cohen intimated that Jews saw open immigration policies as breaking down the homogeneity and unity of America, creating a pluralistic society in which Jews could thrive.In his monumental book A History of Jews in America, Howard Sachar notes that pluralism supports “legitimizing the preservation of a minority culture in the midst of a majority’s host society.”[880] So, in effect, by breaking down the integrity and cohesion of America, Jews could increase their integrity and cohesion. Sachar goes on to explicitly show how pluralism intensifies Jewish solidarity:

But Kallen’s influence extended really to all educated Jews: Legitimizing the preservation of a minority culture in the midst of a majority’s host society, pluralism functioned as intellectual anchorage for an educated Jewish second generation, sustained its cohesiveness and its most tenacious communal endeavors through the rigors of the Depression and revived anti-Semitism, through the shock of Nazism and the Holocaust, until the emergence of Zionism in the post-World War II years swept through American Jewry with a climactic redemptionist fervor of its own.[881]

Social psychologist Kevin MacDonald pointed out in A People That Shall Dwell Alone that major anti-Semitic movements are usually found in ethnically homogeneous nations and that “ethnic and religious pluralism serves external Jewish interests because Jews become just one of many ethnic groups… and it becomes difficult or impossible to develop unified, cohesive groups of Gentiles united in their opposition of Judaism.”[882] [883]

In his 1985 book A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today, Charles Silberman writes that

American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief, one firmly rooted in history, that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse “gay rights” and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called “social issues.” [884]

John Higham, in his book Send These to Me: Immigrants in Urban America, states in clear terms that Jewish-sponsored changes in immigration law were a defeat of the political and cultural representation of “the common people of the South and West.”[885]

During the decades leading up to opening the borders in 1965, Jewish groups had piously stated that there should be no discrimination against any group in immigration and that such could only be good for America. But, Richard Arens, staff director of the Senate subcommittee that produced the Walter-McCarran Act, pointed out that the same Jewish forces which were the most avid promoters of open immigration, hypocritically opposed ethnic immigration they deemed unfavorable to their own interests.

One of the curious things about those who most loudly claim that the 1952 act is “discriminatory” and that it does not make allowance for a sufficient number of alleged refugees, is that they oppose admission of any of the approximately one million Arab refugees in camps where they are living in pitiful circumstances after having been driven out of Israel.[886]

Organized Jewry not only wants to prevent Arab refugees from returning to their homes in Israel, they also oppose their coming to the United States. Do they see the displaced Palestinians as potential political opponents? Jewish groups clearly promote forms of multiculturalism that destroy Gentile cohesion, but not those which could threaten their own group power. So clearly, their dedication to multiculturalism is purely a strategic one; they want groups coming into the nation which can further pluralize American society and destroy its cohesion, but not those groups whom they see as political threat.

Jewish-dominated political and media institutions have long promoted the demographic invasion and dissolution of America. While the Jewish media demonize as “racists” those who oppose the flood of non-White immigration into America, Canada and all the European nations, Israel’s immigration policy that excludes non-Jews is condoned. A million Palestinians fled their homes in the wake of the Israeli blitzkrieg takeover of Palestine. They cannot return to their ancestral homeland, and many are forced to live in refugee camps that are little more than concentration camps of want and squalor.

A. M. Rosenthal is the long-time editor of perhaps the most influential newspaper in America, the Jewish-owned New York Times. A hawkish supporter of Israel, he only complains about the Zionist state when it is not Zionist enough for his taste. Yet, in a 1992 editorial Rosenthal feels obligated to criticize another country which desires to preserve its racial integrity and cultural heritage:

They would do better to set a quota on immigrants and nurture a more pluralist society by adopting a formula for citizenship based on residence than blood ties.

Equally distressing is Bonn’s failure to revise an outdated naturalization law rooted in ethnicity. Under the existing system, a Turkish guest worker who has lived in Germany for 30 years and speaks German fluently is denied the citizenship automatically granted a Russian-speaking immigrant who can prove German ancestry. [887]

Rosenthal likens current German immigration policies to that of the Nazis. Yet, is Israeli immigration law so different?

Not only Germany, but every White nation is a target of Rosenthal’s open immigration advocacy. Only Israel’s immigration policy — the most draconian of all — is immune from criticism. In America, Rosenthal identifies himself as the offspring of an illegal immigrant (his father) and even lauds the immigration of Haitians, many of whom are drug users and HIV-positive.

Almost always now, when I read about Haitians who risk the seas to get to this country but wind up behind barbed wire, I think of an illegal immigrant I happen to know myself, and of his daughters and his son [himself]….

Even reluctantly recognizing some economic limitations, this country should have the moral elegance to accept neighbors who flee countries where their life is terror and hunger, and are run by murderous gangs….

If that were a qualification for entry into our Golden land, the Haitians should be welcomed with song, embrace and memories.[888]

As a chronic reader of The New York Times, I have yet to read a Rosenthal editorial calling for the acceptance into Israel of the million or more Palestinians who are forced by Israel to live in the dire poverty of the refugee camps. Nor has Rosenthal ever called upon Jews to welcome Palestinian refugees into Israel with “song and embrace.” Rosenthal is not stupid, but he is profoundly hypocritical. He knows that making full citizens of all the Palestinians currently in Israel and all those in refugee camps outside its borders would quickly sweep away the Zionist political state in the same way that non-European immigration erodes the America of our forefathers.

On the other side of the coin, Rosenthal knows that Israel could not have been created but for their emigration-invasion of Palestine. Looking at the historical record, should Palestinians have welcomed the Jewish immigrants with song and embrace? Rosenthal has no more regard for traditional Americans anymore than he has for the original Palestinian inhabitants of what is now called Israel. He has only one overwhelming concern: Jewish Supreamcism.

Rosenthal is proud of what he and many other Jews are: aliens as much as the wetbacks with whom he identifies. He lives here, partaking of all the advantages of American citizenship, but he will not — and cannot — become a real American who places the interests of America above those of the Zionist agenda.

As the Jews become more brazen in their exercise of power, some now boast of their role in dispossessing the European-Gentile American. Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, an associate of the ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith) and writer for the San Francisco Jewish Bulletin, wrote:

It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting those changes.[889]

Raab goes on to celebrate the coming minority status of Whites in America. Once that has happened, he looks forward to “constitutional constraints” (restriction of freedom of speech?):

The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.

We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever. [890]

As Raab says, Zionist Jewish activists who have supported an exclusively Jewish-run national state have been nourishing massive nontraditional immigration into America, and they look forward to the time when the voting demographics of the United States reflect that transformation.

I wonder if Zionist Israel Zangwill — who coined the term “melting pot” — envisioned his Jewish state as a melting pot of Jew and Arab; of Islam and Judaism. Given the ethnocentrism of Zionism, I rather doubt it. One American cartoonist wrote that the problem with a melting pot is that “The bottom always gets burned, and the scum rises to the top.” It is true that America has seen a melting of the different nationalities of Europe into a traditional American majority, but in spite of the pervasive race-mixing propaganda of the Jewish media, there has been no great melting of the White and Black, and only marginal melting of the Mestizo and Anglo elements. However, what these Zionists have not yet been able to accomplish through their advocacy of miscegenation, they are in the process of achieving through massive immigration and differential birthrates.

Jews have also promoted, through “zero-population” advocates such as Paul Ehrlich, smaller families among the natural leaders of the American majority. Jewish promotion of the women’s liberation movement and abortion on demand has lowered the birthrate of America’s most productive and educated classes. Their blunt desire is the dissolution of the European race in the West by any means necessary. Continued massive non-European immigration satisfies
these aims.

In summary, massive non-White immigration has been one of the most effective weapons of organized Jewry in its cultural and ethnic war against the European American. We cannot win this life and death struggle until our people realize that we are in the midst of a war — and our side is suffering great losses. To lose this war would mean the destruction of our American culture, heritage, and freedoms. It would mean nothing less than the destruction of the very genes that have made possible all the social, cultural and spiritual creations that distinguish our civilization. Our voices are muted by mass media that are in the hands of our enemies. Too many of us are silently witnessing the genocide of our people. The time is late. We must speak out now and defend ourselves. We must fight for the continuation of the magnificent culture bequeathed to us by our forefathers. We must take whatever action necessary to insure the future of our children and our generations to come. As is true for all living things, we must fight for our right to live.

America is in many ways already occupied similarly to the Israeli occupation of Palestine. Jewish Supremacists control the news, publishing and entertainment media, they control our elections and politicians, and now they are orchestrating a massive immigration into our land that will make us a politically and culturally impotent minority in the same way that the people of Palestine have suffered that fate. They seek to make our country into a tower of Babel in which they will occupy the top floors.

Not only are Americans on the road to oblivion from immigration, but so are our brethren across Europe. Indeed, many nations are under the Jewish Supremacist drive toward globalization, and the destruction of any sort of ethnic or national pride and cohesiveness that could pose a threat to their hegemony. They seek to remake the world into an unremarkable mass of atomistic, deracinated individuals incapable of collective resistance.

If we remain silent in this critical time in our people’s history, our people will be extinguished and silent forever.

This maxim is not only true for Europeans and Americans, but for all the peoples of the Earth.

References

869. Smith, Drew L. (1971). The Legacy Of The Melting Pot. North Quincy, Massachusetts. Christopher Publishing House
870. Congressional Record, April 12, 1924. 6,265-6,266.
871. Ross, E. A. (1914). The Old World And The New: The Significance Of Past And Present Immigration To The American People. New York: The Century Co. p.144..
872. Congressional Record, April 12, 1924. 6,272.
873. Congressional Record, April 23, 1952. 2,285.
874. Joint Hearings Before The Subcommittees Of The Committees On The Judiciary, 82nd Congress, First Session,
On S. 716, H. R. 2379, And H. R. 2816. March 6April 9, 1951. 563
875. Congressional Record, April 23, 1952. 4,320.
876. Javits, J (1951) Let’s Open Our Gates New York Times Magazine July 8. p.8, 33.
877. Congress Weekly. (1956). Editorial of February 20. p.3
878. Cohen, N. W. (1972). Not Free To Desist: The American Jewish Committee 1906-1966. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society Of America.
879. Ibid. p.342.
880. Sachar, H. (1992). A History Of Jews In America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
881. Ibid. p.427.
882. MacDonald, K. B. (1994). A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism As A Group Evolutionary Strategy. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
883. MacDonald, K. B. (1998). Separation And Its Discontents: Toward An Evolutionary Theory Of Anti-Semitism. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
884. Silberman, C. E. (1985). A Certain people: American Jews and Their Lives Today. New York: Summit Books.
885. Higham , J. (1984). Send These To Me: Immigrants In Urban America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
886. Bennett, M. T. (1963). American Immigration Policies: A History. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press. p.181.
887. A. M. Rosenthal. (1992). New York Times. December 9.
888. A. M. Rosenthal. (1992). New York Times. December 9.
889. Jewish Bulletin. (1993). July. 23.
890. Jewish Bulletin. (1993). Feb. 19.

 
Read the powerful Preface section to Jewish Supremacism HERE

Also read several sample chapters from David’s master work, My Awakening, HERE!

Order a copy of Jewish Supremacism or My Awakening HERE!

 
Related Links:

VIDEO: Kevin MacDonald on the History of U.S. Immigration Policy

Eleven Jewish Senators Favored Recent Shamnesty Bill

Jew Donates $100 MILLION To Sierra Club, Then Demands NO Stand On Illegal Immigration

Tamar Jacoby: The Little-Known Driving Force Pushing for Illegal Alien Amnesty

Jewish Groups Behind Immigration Invasion

Finally a Debate between McCain and Hayworth

by James Buchanan

After refusing to do a debate with J.D. Hayworth for over six months, John McCain finally condescended to do a debate –on extremely short notice –and only if the spoiler candidate, Jim Deakin were included. The GOP Arizona primary election is still over a month away on August 24th.

John McCain has received millions and millions of dollars in special interest money from the same old big corporations that buy his vote every six years. McCain has used that money to buy commercials to smear Hayworth as much as possible. After months of smearing, McCain recently had his biggest lead over Hayworth in months (about 50 to 30). Hayworth was within five percent of McCain at two times earlier in the election.

It should be noted that the telephone survey polls rely on landlines, which means that young and middle-aged people, who primarily use cell phones, are unlikely to be included in the polls. Unfortunately the Arizona election is an open primary, which means that large numbers of liberals can pretend to be Republicans (just like McCain does himself) and vote for McCain.

Considering that the biggest issue in Arizona for the last six months has been illegal immigration, it’s hard to imagine that more Arizonans are not upset about McCain’s past attempt to pass an Amnesty Bill in 2007. This suggests the polls may be considerably off and that McCain is only getting 50 percent of the vote from very old people with landlines, who get all their information from TV commercials and none from the Internet.

The debate started with an attack on Hayworth’s career as a Congressman. Hayworth responded that he worked on the Bush tax cuts, which John McCain proceeded to vote against. The most jaw-dropping part of the debate was McCain claiming that he had never supported Amnesty. Jim Deakin could not refrain from laughing at that whopper. This would be about the equivalent of Bill Clinton claiming during a debate that he had never had sex with Monica Lewinsky …even after the DNA evidence was revealed.

Hayworth criticized McCain’s support for Obama’s $787 billion dollar stimulus bill as well as TARP funding. McCain mistakenly said that he didn’t want to fund Medicare when he meant to say Obamacare. Hayworth mentioned that he received an endorsement from the enormously popular Sheriff Joe Arpaio and one of John McCain’s POW buddies.

Too bad they didn’t have time to open up the POW can of worms. One article notes “A former Vietnam veteran with top secret clearance says… McCain’s code-name was ‘Songbird’ because of his willingness to tell all to avoid torture. Jack McLamb served nine years in secret operations in Cambodia and other nations before going on to become one of the most highly decorated police officer’s in Phoenix history… (McLamb notes) ‘I know a lot of Vietnam veterans and a few POW’s and all the POW’s that I’ve talked to over the years say that John McCain is a lying skunk… He never was tortured – they were there in the camp with him and then when he came in….he immediately started spilling his guts about everything because he didn’t want to get tortured,’ said McLamb, contradicting the official story that McCain only offered his name, rank, serial number, and date of birth. ‘The Vietnamese Communists called him the Songbird…’ ”

McCain may think he’s safe enough to debate Hayworth based on recent polls, but one political expert after another has commented that McCain is having a very hard time getting above 50 percent. The attacks on Hayworth may have driven 12 percent of his supporters into the undecided category for now, but when it comes time to vote, a majority of Arizonans (including the younger people, the poll missed) could decide it’s time to retire John McCain and his dreams of an illegal alien Amnesty. J.D. Hayworth is the only man with a chance of doing that this election.

To Boldly Go Nowhere: Obama’s Fight to Kill NASA

by Jeff Davis

The Times of London reports: “NASA has begun to wind down construction of the rockets and spacecraft that were to have taken astronauts back to the Moon — effectively dismantling the US human spaceflight programme despite a congressional ban on its doing so. Legislators have accused President Obama’s Administration of contriving to slip the termination of the Constellation programme through the back door to avoid a battle on Capitol Hill.”

A space program is something that an advanced First World nation would have. The United States however is rapidly turning into a Third World nation. We have our first Third World president squatting in the Oval Office, who wants to kill off our space program to shift money to support that growing burden caused by 100 million Third World people in the US.

The Times goes on: “Constellation aimed to build upon what was arguably America’s greatest technological achievement, the first lunar landing of 1969, by launching new expeditions to the Moon and to Mars and worlds beyond. Mr Obama proposed in February that it should be scrapped because it was over budget, behind schedule and lacking in innovation, but he has met opposition in Congress, which has yet to approve his plan.The head of NASA, Major-General Charlie Bolden — an Obama appointee — has now written to aerospace contractors telling them to cut back immediately on Constellation-related projects costing almost $1 billion (£690 million), to comply with regulations requiring them to budget for possible contract termination costs. The move has been branded a disingenuous legal manoeuvre and referred to NASA’s inspector-general for investigation. ‘It’s bordering on arrogance by the Administration to boldly and brazenly go forward with this approach. It shows a blatant disregard for Congress,’ said the Republican Congressman Rob Bishop, of Utah, whose constituency stands to lose thousands of jobs.”

We’re in the middle of a Depression and we don’t need to be losing any more high tech jobs. The original mission to the moon helped pioneer a variety of new technology from compact computers to camcorders to Tang. The invention of the compact computer led to the whole PC industry, the software industry and the Internet.

A mission back to the moon and/or mars could easily create even more high technology that could ultimately help the economy.

The article notes “Two weeks ago the Senate passed legislation that compels NASA to continue work on Constellation unless Congress directs otherwise. That legislation is due to be signed into law by Mr Obama this month while Congress continues its deliberations over his proposal to cancel the current space progamme.”

I guess that’s one way to pay for Obamacare.

Liberals and Democrats have never been comfortable with the space program. It’s way too much of a “White thing.” The more they try to shoehorn quota-hire Blacks and Latinos into the space program, the more we start crashing space probes. NASA needs to be competent enough to accomplish its mission without barbecuing astronauts during reentry or plunging billion dollar lawn darts into the surface of mars.

The space program has also always been one of the proudest achievements of the Old America, the one run by White people. We obviously can’t have a government program that allows White people, many of them “the hated White males” to shine. The Democrats are spending money right, left and center like drunken sailors to bail out banks and to stimulate the economy, but apparently when it comes to exploring the universe around us in the name of all humanity, the cupboard is bare. What pathetic easily-forgotten historical pygmies they are!

AIPAC of Raving Lunatics

The following article effectively shows the grip of AIPAC on American politics and the rush toward a catastrophic war with Iran. Such a war would inevitably cause a huge spike in oil prices and unleash hatred and terrorism across the Mideast and the world. Oil at $200 dollars a barrel or more would absolutely crush the already vulnerable economy of the United States, Europe and the world. Even the highest intelligence echelon of the United States recently stated again that there is no evidence that Iran is pursuing a nuclear bomb. Israel is the one in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Iran is a signatory and allows inspections. Israel allows no inspections in this nations active nuclear, chemical and biological weapons development. As the article also shows, the Jewish Lobby has such a grip on America that the Congress sends Israel the equivalent of $30,000 dollars for every Israeli man, woman and child. This when millions of Americans are out of work, losing their homes or unable to afford health insurance! This theft continues even though Israeli’s have one of the highest per capita incomes in the world! This is a powerful article, which I hope everyone will distribute far and wide. — David Duke

by Keith Johnson from Revolt of the Plebs Website

Without regard for the severe economic devastation and loss of life that a war with Iran would create, Israel’s agents in the United States continue to aggressively stoke the fires of anti-Iranian rhetoric and mobilize their minions on the floor of the House. The Brzezinski-Soros machine failed in their attempt to effect regime change in Iran by way of a “color revolution” in the summer of 2009. This has only emboldened the Israeli lobby to pursue more drastic measures. There is only one card left for them to play before provoking conflicts that will most certainly catapult the United States into direct military action against the Islamic state.

Tuesday, the American Israeli Political Action Committee gave their marching orders to their congressional War Hawks. The message was short, concise and clear. Here is the text of the letter AIPAC sent to members of Congress:

Dear Congressman XXXX,

We are writing to every member of Congress to express outrage at the U.S. government’s continuing relationship with dozens of companies doing business with Iran. These ongoing financial dealings undermine longstanding American efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability.

As the New York Times reported on Sunday, the federal government during the past decade has awarded $107 billion in contracts and grants to more than 70 companies that are doing business in Iran. More than two-thirds of these contracts have gone to companies involved in Iran’s energy industry despite American law to discourage such involvement.

The time has long since passed this policy to change. Unfortunately, as the Times points out, three successive American administrations have failed to enforce the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, which mandates U.S. sanctions on firms investing more than $20 million in Iran’s energy sector. While Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama may have discouraged some investment in Iran through their rhetoric, the United States has sent the American and international business community a contradictory message by failing to enforce the law.

Despite publicly acknowledged investments by several companies of hundreds of millions of dollars in Iran’s energy sector, the U.S. Government has inexplicably failed to make even one determination of an investment of $20 million during the course of the past decade. Yet, throughout this entire time, Iran has pursued a nuclear weapons capability, flouting its international obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and presenting the international community with a growing, and now urgent, threat.

As Iran continues to reject U.S.-European engagement efforts and to defy U.N. Security Council resolutions requiring that it halt its illicit uranium enrichment efforts, the United States must take action now.

We call on Congress to:

1. Investigate why successive administrations have failed to implement the law by failing to determine what companies have invested in the Iranian energy sector;

2. Enact—without delay—the Iran sanctions legislation currently before Congress, which, inter alia, contains provisions barring federal contracts to companies which are investing in Iran’s energy sector or providing sensitive technology, and their parents or subsidiaries who are engaged in such activity;

3. Demand that the U.S. Government enforce existing sanctions law and impose crippling new sanctions on Iran.

In addition to these actions, we hope you will join with us in urging the administration to impose tough new multilateral sanctions with like-minded states without delay while continuing to pursue the widest possible sanctions through the U.N. Security Council.

Sincerely,

David Victor
President

Howard Kohr
Executive Director

These are pretty strong words coming from an organization which has stood in defiance of U.S. law that requires them to register as agents of a foreign power. It proves once again that the “A” in AIPAC really should be removed from their acronym. There is nothing “American” about them. This is the Israeli lobby, plain and simple. They represent Israel first and last. The United States is nothing more than a host to their endless parasitism. This letter should be an insult to anyone familiar with the State of Israel and it’s long history of refusing to comply with International laws and treaties. It reeks of hypocrisy. It’s an exercise in contempt. There is no country on the face of this earth with less justification to level these charges or make such demands.

First of all, Iran has no nuclear weapons capability. As recently as February 11, 2010, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs responded to a claim by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that Iran had produced the first stock of 20 percent enriched uranium. Gibbs said, “The Iranian nuclear program has undergone a series of problems throughout the year. We do not believe they have the capability to enrich to the degree to which they now say they are enriching.” The enriched uranium that Ahmadinejad was referring to was not for building a nuclear weapon but rather for medical isotopes used to treat cancer patients. And even if they did have the capability of enriching to 20 percent, it still falls far short of the nearly 98% that is required for building a weapon of mass destruction. As a signer of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran has a legal right to enrich uranium in the manner that they are claiming. On the other hand, Israel has refused to sign the NNPT and has no right to make demands of anyone pertaining to nuclear technology.

While the author of this letter points out that “the federal government has awarded $107 billion in contracts and grants to more than 70 companies that are doing business in Iran,” it fails to recognize that 14 of those companies have already pulled out and that 11 plan no future investment. Of the 49 remaining, only 3 are suspected of being in violation of the “Iran Sanctions Act”. Those three companies are Daelim (South Korea), Dutch Royal Shell (Netherlands) and Total (France). Of the $174 million that Daelim received in contract money from the U.S., $111 million was used to build family housing towers for the U.S. Army. Dutch Royal Shell received $11.2 billion in contracts and that investment was instrumental in supplying a significant amount of gasoline to the U.S. military. Not one American company currently doing business and planning future investment in Iran is suspected of being in violation of the “Iran Sanctions Act”.

The author demands that Congress enact current legislation that bars companies from investing in Iran’s energy sector. But this is in direct conflict with Article IV of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iran is a signer of that treaty, and that obligates the United States to help them build power plants and other facilities for non-military purposes.

If anyone should be barred from receiving federal contracts or aid it is the State of Israel, who has refused to sign the NNPT and have illegally pursued a nuclear weapons program of their own. The 1976 Symington Amendment to the Foreign Appropriations Bill of 1961 forbids the United States from giving foreign aid to any nation that is developing nuclear technology outside the NNPT. Despite this, approximately 1/3 of the total foreign aid budget of the United States is annually sent to Israel even though they comprise less than .001 of the world’s population and has one of the world’s highest per capita incomes. Former Congressman James Traficant rightly pointed out recently that between the direct foreign aid grants to Israel, along with all of the other benefits including trade compacts, economic and military assistance, “Israel gets approximately $15 billion a year from the American taxpayers. That $15 billion is $30,000 for every man, woman and child in Israel.”

In his list of demands, the author urges Congress to “pursue the widest possible sanctions through the U.N. Security Council.” This is the height of hypocrisy. Neither the State of Israel nor its agents have any standing with the United Nations in this regard. Since its inception, the State of Israel has been in violation of more UN resolutions than any other nation on earth.

Who else but a raving lunatic would even dare to write such a letter in light of the insurmountable evidence that contradicts each and every line of their text? There is no other explanation; a lunatic wrote this letter. And if Congress acts in lock step to their demands, then it should be abundantly clear to all of us that the lunatics, have indeed, taken over the asylum.

Left: President Obama in the White House with Chabad Lubavitch leader Levi Shemtov. As documented below, Chabad is a Jewish extremist organization that literally believes that the purpose of all Gentiles is to “serve Jews” and that Gentiles are inferior and have in fact “satanic souls.” Do a Google Search and read about one of Chabad’s leading rabbis, Yitzhak Ginsburgh who recently endorsed a book in Israel calling for the murder of Gentile babies who hold a “potential threat for Israel.” Also documented below is a statement by Ginsburgh in Jewish Week where he says it is moral for a Jew to kill a Gentile and steal his liver because Jewish life has “infinite value” as compared to “inferior” Gentiles. All this is well documented and proven, so why no outrage at the close relationship of  the President of the United States to this extremist Jewish hate group, and why does the national and international media cover up what should be a scandal of huge proportions?  This embargo of truth about Jewish extremism shows you who really is in control of politics and media — doesn’t it?  Why is Dr. Duke called an anti-Semite for exposing this Jewish extremist influence in the highest levels of government, yet no major media will dare to expose the most powerful and influential hate group in the world and its close relationship with governments across the world? –Staff

Here is my updated Author’s Preface to Jewish Supremacism. Notice the powerful new references and exposure of Chabad Lubavitch. The fact that this Jewish extremist, hate organization can not only escape mainstream criticism, but in fact be praised and commended by almost every major political leader of the West reveals the radical Jewish influence on both our media and government. In America and the whole world, no book is doing more to awaken people about the danger of Jewish extremism than this book. It is now back in print, and I will be happy to autograph all orders, and remember that we offer a discount and discounted airmail shipping to America and most of the world! — Thanks,  David Duke

David Duke’s Preface to Jewish Supremacism — latest edition

I promise that this book will challenge you. Its amazing documentary evidence will confront some of your most cherished beliefs.

If you can put aside, as best you can, the prejudices you may have on this subject and even preconceptions you might have about me personally, you can more fairly evaluate the ideas and evidence in this book. That is all an author can ask of his reader, and I ask it of you. It is my earnest belief that if you endeavor to keep an open mind, what you read will surprise you.

The real power of this book comes from its documentation from major sources. In fact, you will quickly discover that most of my documents about Jewish supremacism and international Zionism are from Jewish sources. They argue more convincingly for my point of view than anything I could write. I encourage you to go to the sources that I quote and check them out for yourself. In this book, I take you with me on a fascinating journey of discovery in a forbidden subject. I urge you: courageously keep an open mind while you explore the topics ahead. That is the only way any of us can find the truth.

Some will defame this book by calling it anti-Semitic. Yet, it is not considered anti-American to examine historical mistreatment of American Indians. No one calls it anti-Christian to talk about the excesses of the Inquisition. Is one considered anti-White for documenting the history of Jim Crow in the South? The mass media are filled with stories about the dangers of Muslim extremism. No one says that it is anti-Muslim to examine extreme elements of Muslim fundamentalism. This book dares to examine a forbidden topic: Jewish extremism.

This book is not anti-Semitic; it simply examines and documents the powerful extremist elements of ethnic supremacism that have existed in the Jewish community from historical to modern times. This book will prove, and it will do so by mostly Jewish sources, the existence of Jewish supremacist elements in many of the highest echelons of government, media and financial power. Because anyone who addresses this subject is slandered as an “anti-Semite” it is vital that I repeat emphatically that this book has is not against all Jews; it pertains only to Jewish extremists. I have much respect for individual Jews; this volume is in fact dedicated to a Jew: the late Israel Shahak.

As an introductory glimpse into Jewish supremacism, I can point to the close relationship of the White House of the United States with a very powerful, extremist Jewish organization, Chabad Lubavitch.

What is Chabad Lubavitch? It is worldwide, ultra-orthodox Jewish extremist organization with members in every leading nation of the world. If you are not familiar with the organization, its racial supremacism will shock you.

Chabad Lubavitch teaches that Gentiles are unclean, inferior creatures whose sole purpose on the earth is to serve Jews. Various Chabad rabbis maintain that Jews are literally the DNA of God, while Gentiles are the “supernal refuse of creation.[1]” They often teach that it is no sin, and is in fact righteous, to kill or cheat a Gentile. Some readers may not want to believe this, but any quick research on the Internet to official Chabad sites and the writings of numerous Chabad rabbis will bear out every word that I say. You will find that everything in Jewish Supremacism is thoroughly documented and referenced.

Chabad and other extremist orthodox rabbis frequently author columns in the largest Jewish newspaper in the United States, Jewish Week. In this paper you will find supremacist attitudes that any decent human being would call horrific. Examine the following quote:

As for the goyim…Zalman’s attitude (was): “Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.” …If every simple cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part of God, then every strand of DNA is a part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA. …

If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value,” he explained. “There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life. – Chabad Lubavitch Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh in Jewish Week, the largest Jewish publication in the United States.

This Statement was made by a leading Lubavitch Rabbi named Yitshak Ginsburgh and it can be found in the April 26, 1996 Jewish Week. Many Christians would doubt the authenticity of the quote simply because they could not believe any religious leader would actually say that it would be moral for a Jew to kill a Gentile and take his liver. In many of my lectures, I bring home the horror of what Rabbi Ginsburgh said by pointing out to the non-Jews in the audience that he argues that Jews have the moral right to murder your mother or father, son or daughter, husband or wife to provide a liver for a Jew. The evil of such a statement is simply beyond the comprehension of most of us, but again, this statement was made in largest, most popular Jewish publication in the United States.

For simply quoting Ginsburgh and exposing Jewish supremacism in my writings and lectures I have been condemned as a hater, anti-Semite and a bigot. I must endure this treatment by the media while Ginsburgh himself has received hardly a whiff of criticism. His statement was not one of a lone extremist Jew off somewhere in a remote desert of Israel, but was made by one of the honored leaders of a sect that actually has parties and conferences in the White House.

The New Republic in a May 4, 1992 article revealed the hateful anti-Gentile nature of Chabad Lubavitch.

…there are some powerful ironies in Chabad’s new messianic universalism, in its mission to the gentiles; and surely the most unpleasant of them concerns Chabad’s otherwise undisguised and even racial contempt for the goyim.

…Moreover, this characterization of gentiles as being inherently evil, as being spiritually as well as biologically inferior to Jews, has not in any way been revised in later Chabad writing. (The New Republic)[2]

The “Great Rebbe” is the spiritual leader of Chabad. He was late Rabbi Menachem Schneerson many Jews worship like a Messiah. Chabad claims that Rabbi Schneerson never committed a sin in his entire life, and they gathered by the thousands at his gravesite expecting him to rise from the dead. What did Rabbi Schneerson say about Gentiles?

The following quotes are taken from a book of his recorded messages to followers in Israel, titled Gatherings of Conversations and published in Israel in 1965. During the subsequent three decades of his life until his death, Rabbi Schneerson remained consistent; he did not change any of the opinions. What Rabbi Schneerson taught became official, Lubavitch-Hassidic doctrine. Regarding the non-Jew the Lubovitcher Rebbe’s views were clear:

The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: “Let us differentiate.” Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of “let us differentiate” between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world …

…An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.

We therefore ask: Why should a non-Jew be punished if he kills even a non-Jewish embryo while a Jew should not be punished even if he kills a Jewish embryo? The answer can be understood by [considering] the general difference between Jews and non-Jews: A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews.”[3]

Only a few courageous Jews have fought against the Jewish supremacism and anti-Gentile racial hatred of Chabad Lubavitch. One is Dr. Michael Samuel, a former professor of Judaic studies. Here is an excerpt of a letter he sent about Government funding of a Chabad center in Montreal, Canada:

My name is Michael Samuel. I am a former professor in the Judaic studies department of Concordia University, Montreal, and I have a question for you:

What would you do if a racist cult tried to build its headquarters in your neighborhood? What if the cult targeted specifically young people, teaching them that all Christians and Muslims are:

1. evil, satanic creatures from birth (making all Gentile babies “little demons”)

2. no better than worms

3. not really living beings at all, but already “dead”

4. all to be forcibly converted or subjugated by the “Messiah”

5. and that it is their sacred duty to hasten the arrival of this “Messiah” in order to accomplish the forcible conversion or subjugation of non-Jews as soon as possible.

These are just some of the racist teachings of the fanatical messianic cult named “Chabad Lubavitch.” This cult, masquerading as “authentic Judaism,” has been promised nearly one million dollars in funding by the government of Premier Lucien Bouchard of Quebec in order to build its new religious and “outreach” (missionary) complex in Cote St. Luc, Montreal.

Why should you care? Because Chabad Lubavitch is not just our problem, it may be yours as well. It is an extremely powerful, worldwide organization. Its power has until now intimidated the media, who are afraid to expose the evidence of racism produced here to the public, lest they be accused of anti-Semitism. We desperately need your help in breaking this media blackout. …[4]

Dr. Samuel failed in his efforts to stop the funding of the Chabad Lubavitch center in Montreal. Canada has imprisoned citizens for the “hate crime” of simply criticizing Jewish extremism, but gave this Jewish extremist sect that spouts vicious anti-Gentile hate $800,000 of Canadian tax money. Chabad’s influence goes much further than simply getting tax money; they have an inside track to the most powerful political leaders in the world.

The photos show the head of White House policy, Joshua Bolten, as well as President Bush, with rabbis of this extreme Jewish organization, Chabad Lubavitch. The White House regularly invites Chabad rabbis for its celebrations, and even allows them in to teach the many Jewish activists who work there. Chabad Lubavitch rabbis often give the prayer at formal White House Cabinet meetings.

You will look in vain in the popular mass media or in political circles for any serious condemnation of Jewish supremacism. In fact, George Bush actually issued a statement on June 27, 2006 honoring the memory of the Great Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Every U.S. President since Rabbi Schneerson’s death has honored this extreme Jewish supremacist. Here is a direct quote from the Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA) reporting on the honoring of Rabbi Schneerson and showing their influence on American policy.

White House to Chabad: Bush won’t press Israel

The Bush administration will not force Israel into unilateral concessions, top White House officials told representatives of the Lubavitch movement.

Chabad Lubavitch culminated a two-day commemoration of the 12th anniversary of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson’s death with meetings Wednesday with Michael Chertoff, the Homeland Security secretary, and Joshua Bolten, the White House chief of staff. Both men are Jewish.

Bolten and other White House officials assured Chabad representatives that President Bush would never force Israel to concede territory to the Palestinians without a quid pro quo, participants said. Bolten said Bush would follow Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s lead in deciding what concessions to support[5]

If space permitted, I could show pictures of Chabad leaders with every president since Richard Nixon. I could show pictures of Chabad leaders with President Mitterrand of France, Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, President Victor Yushchenko of Ukraine and even President Putin of Russia.

It is not just the bearded extremists of Chabad that have such supremacist sentiments, many of the publicly acknowledged, most influential Jews of the United States. A perfect example is Stephen Steinlight. He served for five years as the Director of National Affairs for the largest and most powerful Jewish organization in the United States, the American Jewish Committee. He made the following remarks in an article on immigration in a national Jewish magazine in October of 2001:

I’ll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one. …[6]

If any Gentile politician dared to say that “typical Jewish kids” are deliberately taught that their real loyalty is not to America but to Israel; and that Jews say they are superior to Gentiles in intelligence and morals, he would be mercilessly condemned by the media and hounded out of politics as an anti-Semite. Yet, this stark admission is by the former head of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee. It should be emphasized that Steinlight’s words are not from an off-handed or careless conversation, but are his carefully chosen words from a major article he wrote for Jewish consumption, called “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demographics.”

If this leading American Jew is accurate, a real threat exists to the United States. For if “typical Jews of his generation” are indeed loyal to Israel over the nations in which they live, is there not a danger that they could use their influence in media and government to serve the Zionist agenda? This book will show how powerful Jewish supremacists have used their influence to steer America into a Mideast policy catastrophic to American interests. Israeli-centric Middle East policies have led America to suffer the horrific terrorism of 9/11.

This volume will show that they have led us to the carnage and disaster of the Iraq War — a war that has led to 500,000 Iraqi dead, and has cost tens of thousands of American wounded or dead, untold billions of dollars, and hurt American interests all over the world. Does anyone still not know that this war was a war for Israel not America?

Any Gentile politician who would claim that some powerful Jews are disloyal to the nation in which they dwell; and that they are more loyal to Israel and the Jewish agenda, would clearly face career suicide. And what would be the reaction to George Bush or any White leader who said that he believed the White race to be superior? Yet, for some reason Steinlight’s account of naked Jewish supremacism received not a word of attention in the media or political establishment.

Any criticism of Jewish extremism is immediately condemned as “anti-Semitism.” The chronic media recital of the horrors of the Holocaust has made the term “anti-Semitic” morally equivalent to the endorsement of mass murder. The word itself shuts down reason and evokes heat rather than light. The word is flagrantly overused; it is even used against those who simply protest Israeli human rights violations against Palestinians.

I am reluctant to begin my book by saying what it is not. The media climate, however, forces me to do so.

Due to the overwhelming power of the media to distort what I say and write, I state emphatically here and now that I do not oppose all Jews, any more than an author examining the excesses of the Inquisition opposes all Christians. Specifically, Jewish Supremacism examines a long record of Jewish supremacist ideology and history that has had a powerful and damaging effect on both the Jewish and Gentile world.

I will be the first to acknowledge that not all Jews support or share in this supremacism. In fact, a number of courageous Jews have suffered greatly for opposing it. One of them: an Israeli professor, Dr. Israel Shahak, was a professor at Hebrew University. He offered strong evidence that Jewish radicals have waged an unrelenting ethnic war against Gentiles since the days of their sojourn in Egypt. Dr. Shahak believed that this extreme chauvinism has helped bring about centuries of repeated anti-Semitic reactions, ranging from the pogroms of Pharaoh to the horrors of what is now called the Holocaust. He persuasively argued that unless both Jews and Gentiles courageously stand up against this supremacist agenda and its power, it will continue to pose a severe danger to Jews and Gentiles alike.[7]

Not only will this book show the existence a Jewish supremacist ideology, it will demonstrate that those who embrace this ideology wield immense power in media, government and world finance. They are powerful enough in the early years of the twentieth century to have sent American servicemen to be maimed or die by the tens of thousands in the Iraq War, a war based on the “weapons of mass destruction lie and other lies that they promoted practically unchallenged in their media. The war was certainly against every true interest of the United States of America. Now, they plan new wars and new catastrophes for America and for the world.

This book is ultimately about lessening both the dangers and the hatreds between our peoples. This cannot happen until both Jews and Gentiles hear the other side of the Jewish Question, a point of view currently forbidden in the modern world.

_____________________________

As I write the lines of this preface, I sit on a mountain in the Colorado Rockies named after the aspen tree, whose shade I now enjoy. Its cylindrical leaves turn easily in the cool breeze, reflecting the sunlight and affording me a magical image. Through those glittering leaves I can see snow capped peaks on the horizon. The sight pleases both my eyes and my soul. From this mystic place, I cannot see a single human being; only the magnificence of Nature fills my eyes. Questions of politics, culture, religion, nationalities, ethnicity and race seem far away from here. From this vantage point, the world and even Nature herself appear serene. Yet, when I look closely at the scenic beauty of Nature, I can see conflict and war that far eclipses even the worst turmoil found in mankind.

Here on this mountain a never-ending struggle rages of element against element and species against species. The wind, rain and snow will someday level these great mountains of rock. Even the flowing stream, the ultimate symbol of serenity for many people, violently fights for its life of movement against the mountain. Indeed, in time this great mountain will eventually succumb to even the tiniest rivulets of water and the other erosions of Nature.

As I write in my notebook, two ants approach a peach pit on the rock beside me. One ant is larger and very differently equipped than the other. He has his way over the smaller one, but the vanquished creature runs back to his kingdom to report the great store of sweet food. His relatives will seek to return to the treasure before their competitors. The two tiny breeds might even go to war over the morsel. My eyes open to the war waged all around me.

On this mountain, the trees, bushes and grasses compete for the sunlight and life itself. Smaller birds keep wary eyes out for hawks. The flora and fauna face the danger of death from the insects and parasites seeking to consume them. Even within every life form, a microscopic war rages. The more closely one looks, the more intense the battle. In one cubic meter of rich soil there are more living creatures injured, killed, eaten or even exploited and enslaved than all the numbers of human beings on earth who have faced a similar fate. Biologists could offer endless examples of the never-ending battle for life and dominance between life forms, enough to fill a million books the size of this one.

Yet, oddly, it is this brutal struggle of survival waged over a billion years that produced the serene beauty that so touches my heart as I look out from this high place. So, perhaps this mountain is not so unlike the eternal battles among humankind. The historical struggle among human races has played a powerful role in our human evolution just as it has for all life forms throughout the natural world. Its result for humanity is no less breathtaking than the view from this mountain. It produced a higher humanity that has given us the art of DaVinci’s Madonna and Child, the ultimate expressions of sublime love found in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet or Keats’ Ode on a Grecian Urn.

The eternal struggle created the evolutionary advances that enabled our kind to put our footprints on the moon. It is still hard to grasp that human beings have walked on another world and actually traveled to the golden orb of light that mankind has gazed up at with wonder for millennia. Could these things have been achieved without the evolutionary struggle for life and dominance that has driven us upward? An argument can surely be made that it is this life and death struggle for evolutionary fitness that produced the beautiful and ultimate forms of love and achievement that in turn give us meaning. This struggle created the beauty in mankind and the glory of its creations, just as a seemingly cruel Nature created the stark splendor seen on this mountain I love.

So perhaps, up here surrounded by a magnificent portrait of Nature, I am not in a world very far removed from the human conflicts down below. Most people see the seemingly serene vistas of Nature and never guess the war that rages underneath its aesthetic canopy. There are also those who are unaware of the racial and ethnic wars boiling both on and under the surface of humanity.

I seek to lessen the hatreds between mankind and offer a vision of every people having the right to preserve their heritage and their freedom. You cannot work to end a war, if you don’t even acknowledge that it exists. This book is about an ethnic war being raged for 3,000 years being waged by one extremist group against the rest of humanity.

Although we fantasize about the peace-loving nature of human beings, most of human history is a record of tribal, ethnic or racial war of one kind or another. For instance, the most read book on earth, the Bible, records the bloody history of the conflict between the Israelites and the other peoples of the Middle Eastern region. It tells glorious stories of war and shocking accounts of genocide. Anyone who reads the Old Testament with unbiased eyes will readily discern its dominant theme of racial and ethnic supremacism. There are many blatant expressions of ethnic supremacism:

Israelites are a “chosen people,” chosen by God above all the other peoples of the world.[8]

Israelites have a right to rule over all other people and are promised that they will someday own and rule over the whole world.[9]

Israelites boast of genocide against whole peoples and kingdoms.[10]

Israelites are commanded to murder all the people of the lands where they intend to live, and to kill all the people of foreign nations that do not submit themselves in slavery.[11]

Israelites are forbidden to make slaves of their own people, but are encouraged to enslave non-Israelites whom they may pass down as slaves to their descendants forever.[12]

Israelites are forbidden to intermarry or “mix their seed” with other peoples.[13]

Few people dare to even acknowledge the blatant racial supremacism of the Bible. And those who become aware of the extreme Jewish supremacism in the Old Testament tend to believe that such sentiments are relegated to ancient times and have no influence on the present. Jewish Supremacism, however, shows that the powerful ethnocentrism of ancient Judaism has continued to thrive to the modern day. I will offer compelling evidence that Jewish supremacism is alive and well in the 21st Century. It has a dramatic and increasing effect on world events.

It can be said that I as a Christian also revere the same Old Testament books of supremacy. The difference, of course, is that the Christian New Testament represents a profound shift from the Old. In place of an “eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth,” Jesus Christ taught “turn the other cheek.” In contrast to Jewish supremacism, Christianity offers universal salvation.

Judaism bitterly rejected Jesus Christ and has never enjoyed his teachings of love and tolerance. In fact, not only did the Jewish high priests, the Pharisees, pursue the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, these leaders guided their faith in the opposite ideological direction. It can be said that in addition to the crucifixion of Christ’s body, they killed his spirit in their own hearts.

It would be wrong to hate or persecute present-day Jews because of the role of Jewish leaders in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, but it is important to understand the ideological, religious and ethnic war born during those times.

From the earliest days of Christianity, Jewry became its chief persecutor, for the Pharisees saw the Christian salvation of both “Jew and Greek” as a threat to their ethnic purity and supremacism. It should be said that Judaism is also diametrically opposed to the Muslim faith, which like Christianity also has been interpreted as a universal message. Not only did Jewish supremacists oppose Jesus himself, they mercilessly persecuted his followers, the early Christians.

Yet for fear of the Jews no one spoke openly of him (John 7:13)[14]

. . .for you suffered like things of your own countrymen as they did from the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out and displease God, and oppose all men (1 Thessalonians 2:14-16)[15]

Over the next few centuries, they codified Jewish oral tradition and adopted the Babylonian Talmud as their most important religious text. According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, it even supersedes the Torah in authority.[16] As Jesus Christ represents an evolution of greater love and tolerance, the Talmud only intensified the Torah’s chauvinism. I will thoroughly document this fact from Jewish texts themselves and through quotes from major Jewish scholars who discuss the Talmud’s meaning. The Talmud’s unashamed and frequent references to non-Jews as animals and “supernal refuse,”[17] as well as accounts of boiling their enemies in semen and excrement[18] are expressions of racial hatred that would have made Hitler blush.

I will prove this controversial statement in this book and even show how mainstream Judaic authorities, such as uncensored editions of another major Jewish resource, The Jewish Encyclopedia, confirm the Talmud’s hateful anti-Gentile teachings. I will also show that rabid anti-Gentile teachings are still promoted in modern times by many of the largest Jewish publications, such as the most popular Jewish newspaper in the United States, The Jewish Press. More than any other newspaper, it sets the tone of Jewish religious and cultural attitudes.

One of its primary religious authorities is Rabbi Simcha Cohen, who has an instructional Dear Abby-type column called Halachic Questions. Not long ago, Rabbi Cohen instructed his readers that the Talmud denotes Gentiles as “animals” (as outlined by Talmudic writings from Gemara Kiddushin 68a and Metzia 114b).[19] In another section he discusses how a Jewish woman is not designated as a prostitute if she has premarital sex with a Jew, but she is a whore if she has any sexual relations with a Gentile, even if she is married.

Marriage to a Gentile can never be sanctified or condoned, such a liaison classifies the woman as a zona…common parlance interprets the term zona to refer to a prostitute…. [20]

Another major Jewish publication, The Jewish Chronicle, in an article called “Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen Words,“ reveals that the Jewish word for Gentile woman is the offensive Yiddish word shiksa — meaning “whore,” from the Hebrew root, sheigetz (“abomination”). It also pointed out that a little Gentile girl is called shikselke, meaning “little female abomination.”[21]

Shiksa – the Jewish term for a Gentile woman, from the root word sheigetz meaning “abomination” or “whore.”

Shikselke – a Gentile little girl, meaning “little female abomination.”

How would Jews and the media react if Gentiles casually referred to Jewish women and little girls as “Jewish whores” and “little Jewish whores”? What would happen to any politician or entertainer in the world who referred to Jewish women and little girls as Jewish whores? Am I now supposed to be called an anti-Semite because I simply dare to expose such hateful anti-Gentilism proven in the two most influential Jewish newspapers in America?

The Talmud’s extreme supremacist teachings have certainly been a powerful factor in preventing assimilation of the Jewish people with Christian and Muslim communities. Even though Jews have lived as only a small minority in Gentile nations for more than 3000 years, major Jewish geneticists and anthropologists proudly assert that Jews have preserved their distinctive genetic identity.[22] I will show how supremacist doctrines of fear and hatred of Gentiles, along with notions of Jewish superiority, are carefully instilled in every generation. Every young Jew learns of the perfidious nature of the Gentiles from Pharaoh to Hitler. They are taught that they are “chosen” above all people on earth: perhaps the ultimate expression of ethnic superiority.

This volume will show that the official policies of modern Israel and many of the leading elements of World Jewry still embody radically supremacist sentiments and policies. Organized Jewish elements around the world doggedly pursue their own supremacist agendas. Those agendas frequently conflict with the interests of the host nations in which they live.

My assertion that there exists a powerful, cohesive, worldwide Jewish supremacism finds confirmation in evidence mostly provided by the Jewish supremacists themselves. Their supremacist ideology finds clear enunciation in the foundation, structure and conduct of Israel, a nation unabashedly based on an ethnic supremacism. It is a state that has dispossessed, terrorized and grossly violated the human and civil rights of the Palestinian people.

What is Jewish Supremacism?

The definition of White supremacism from the Random House unabridged Webster’s Dictionary denotes it as “belief in superiority over other races and retaining of control in all relationships.” Let’s take the definition and apply it specifically to the term Jewish supremacism.

Jewish supremacism – The belief, theory or doctrine that the Jewish people are superior to all others and should retain control in all relationships.

As to the first part of the definition, this book assembles powerful evidence that many of the leading Jews of the world have a belief, theory or doctrine that they are superior to all other peoples. I will also clearly show that they seek control in all relationships with other peoples. David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first Prime Minister, often called the “George Washington of Israel” said specifically that he believed in the “moral and intellectual superiority” of the Jewish people.[23] That sentiment is frequent in the writings of Jewish leaders throughout the world. Imagine the outcry if the President of the United States pronounced that he believes in the moral and intellectual superiority of the White race! The Jewish dominated world media have so shielded Jewish supremacists from criticism that their most famous leaders can say such things without fear of any repercussion.

There was no outrage expressed by the world press when Ben-Gurion made his remark, nor did any protest ensue from his supremacist prophecy quoted in Look magazine in 1962; a prediction that Israel would one day sit atop a one world government.

“In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind.”[24]

It also seemed cruelly ironic to his Palestinian victims that there was little outcry when the boastful terrorist Menachem Begin was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Begin brags in his book, The Revolt, about the massacre of over two hundred men, women and children at Deir Yassin. [25] The world hunts down suspected Nazi war criminals, but gives a blood-stained Jewish one…the Nobel Peace Prize! That one event should tell us who is really supreme in the modern world.

The other necessary part of the definition of supremacism denotes having control over other races. I will argue that Jewish supremacists seek to control the nations in which they dwell. They make concerted efforts to dominate the two most critical factors of power in the modern world, mass media and government. This book provides documented evidence of their incredible supremacy in these sectors. This extreme concentration of power exists not only in America, but in most of the major nations of the world including Canada, Britain, Russia, France, Brazil and many more. It is a universal pattern suggesting design rather than accident.

Israel: A Jewish Supremacist State

Israel came into being by massive ethnic cleansing and displacement of Palestine’s indigenous population. At the time of the Balfour Declaration in 1917, Jews made up only 10 percent of the population of what today is Israel. After the Zionist terrorists drove out the British and expelled most of the Palestinian population in 1947 and 1948, Jewish supremacists established Israel. It still scrupulously preserves the cultural and genetic identity of the Jewish people.

Israel protects its Jewish control over its ethnic enclave by carefully guarding its ethnic makeup. It bases its immigration on a genetic standard and limits immigration almost exclusively to those of biological Jewish descent. An atheist Jew from New York City who has never stepped foot inside Israel is financially helped to immigrate, while hundreds of thousands of Palestinians whose families lived there thousands of years cannot return to their birthplace.

Israel is not a “multicultural nation.” It is unashamedly a Jewish state devoted exclusively to the interests, heritage and religion of the Jewish people. A nation with a sizable Palestinian minority, it is certainly the most rigidly segregated society in the world. Separate schools exist for Jews and Arabs, separate apartment complexes, separate neighborhoods and separate settlements. Many policies adversely affect Palestinians as compared to Jews. For instance, Palestinians are forbidden from joining normal units of the military. A former member of Israel’s Supreme Court, Haim Cohen, described the system that applies to Jews and Palestinians in Israel as similar to “Nuremberg laws” of Nazi Germany:

…the bitter irony of fate which has led the same biological and racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infamous Nuremberg laws, to serve as a basis for the definition of Judaism within the State of Israel.[26]

I go deeply into the subject of Israel in the body of this book, but I should not leave the subject now without pointing out that the Jewish supremacism that dominates Israel receives little negative press around the world. Consider the positive press that Israel receives as compared to the unanimous and universal media condemnation that was heaped upon the former apartheid regime in South Africa. Condemnation of South Africa was hypocritically led by an American media thoroughly dominated by Israeli partisans.

I slowly became aware of a dual morality permeating Jewish-Gentile relations. Jews preach one morality for themselves and another for the non-Jewish world. Their highest morality is one of racial pride, solidarity, tradition and self-interest. But they preached diversity and liberalism for their perceived competitors. If such dualism did not exist, how could the Jewish-dominated American media:

Support the nation of Israel, which promotes Judaism in its schools, while opposing even the singing of Christmas carols in American public schools?

Support the nation of Israel, which has strictly segregated schools, communities and facilities for Jews and Arabs, while condemning segregated schools and housing in America and South Africa?

Support the nation of Israel, with its restrictive “Jews Only” immigration laws, while subverting American attempts to curtail even illegal immigration?

Support the nation of Israel, which allows every Jewish citizen to carry a machine gun if desired, while advocating gun control for American citizens?

Support the nation of Israel, which openly states its mission to preserve the Jewish people and heritage, while condemning Palestinians who desire their own state, and scourging European-Americans who dare to advocate the preservation of the Western heritage and culture in America?

Always depict the historical relations between Jews and Gentiles with the Gentiles as evildoers and the Jews as innocent victims, while condemning Gentiles as “anti-Semites” if they dare defend themselves from such ethnic slanders?

Such double standards in the mass media raise other questions. Why is the world press so myopic in regard to Israel’s ethnic suppression? Is it reasonable to suspect that the bias in the press could be a result of a preponderance of Jewish power? Regarding subjects such as Jewish supremacism, this domination certainly affords a reason why the term Jewish supremacism, unlike White supremacism, is never used by the press. Nor is the concept even explored. Even when Meir Kahane called Palestinians “dogs” and advocated forcibly expelling all Palestinians from Israeli occupied territory, he was never referred to as a Jewish supremacist.

On February 25, 1994, an American Jew, Baruch Goldstein, entered a mosque in Hebron and machine-gunned Palestinians at prayer, killing 29 of them. Some Jewish groups in both America and Israel have since made Goldstein a saint, building shrines for him both in America and in Israel. Neither Goldstein nor those who have built shrines to him are ever referred to as Jewish supremacists or even as “anti-Gentiles.”[27] On the opposite hand, if a Gentile even dares to quote the statement by Haim Cohen comparing Israel’s laws to Nazi Nuremberg Laws, he will certainly find himself labeled an “anti-Semite” by the media.

The double standard of world governments and the press is often quite amazing. President George W. Bush, in the aftermath of the World Trade Center bombings of September 11, 2001, announced that any nation that harbors terrorists will feel the wrath of American bombs.

Not long after this pronouncement, Mr. Bush dined with one of the world’s worst terrorists, the Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon. As the world knows, Sharon has a long record of terrorism and murder, including responsibility for the massacre of 1,500 men, women and women children in the Sabra and Chatila refugee camps in Lebanon. During dinner, Mr. Bush did not so much as drop an olive on Mr. Sharon. Unlike hapless Afghanistan, no American bombs have fallen on Tel Aviv for harboring terrorists. In fact, Israel not only harbors terrorists, it has elevated many to be their supreme leaders. Sharon is not the first terrorist who made it to Prime Minister; some of the worst terrorists who achieved that position are Begin, Shamir and Barak.

One might argue that the existence of a supremacist Israeli state does not necessarily mean that the Diaspora (Jews outside of Israel) has the same supremacist agenda. However, one should consider the fact that organized Jewry all over the world devotedly supports the supremacist state of Israel. Secondly, there is ample evidence that policies of Jewish supremacy extend far beyond the boundaries of Israel. Powerful Jews in media and government around the world frequently act to exert control over the peoples among whom they live.

A Worldwide Agenda

Organized Jewry can be clearly shown to have had worldwide strategic objectives since the beginning of the last century. For instance, an early 20th Century goal of Russian and World Jewry was the overthrow of what they considered to be the anti-Semitic, Czarist government of Imperial Russia. Jewish communities around the world supported the establishment of a proto-Jewish, Communist regime in Russia. They provided most of the leadership and financing[28] for the “Russian Revolution,” a revolution that was actually more Jewish led than Russian led. Its chief financier was in fact the New York Jewish capitalist and extreme Jewish supremacist, Jacob Schiff. [29]

One of the many startling documents I cite comes from the National Archives of the United States. It reveals that in the first government of Communist Russia there were only 13 ethnic Russians and more than 300 Jews out of a total of 384 Commissars.[30] Let that startling fact sink in: there were only 13 ethnic Russians in the first Bolshevik government of the “Russian Revolution.” The chief correspondent of the London Times in Russia at the time described it as nothing short of an “alien invasion” and takeover of Russia by Jews.[31] The same was said by our American ambassador to Russia, David Francis,[32] and by American intelligence officers in Russia. Even Winston Churchill described the Russian Revolution as a takeover by Bolshevik Jews that had “…seized the Russian people by the hair of their heads and become the masters of this enormous empire.” [33] This is just a small preview of the startling documents found in this book.

The successful overthrow of a major national government (and murder of its ruling family) as part of a world Jewish agenda shows that even in the early days of the 20th Century they had considerable worldwide economic, political and media power. In the years since, their power has grown exponentially. Most people are still completely unaware of the paramount role of Jewry in the origins of Bolshevism in Russia and the spreading of Communism throughout the world.

The public’s lack of knowledge in this area illustrates Jewry’s influential role in academia and media. Otherwise, how could such important and easily verifiable facts of history be kept from common knowledge?

It also reveals the incredible cohesion and coordination of Jewish power around the world that can be mobilized for specific Jewish objectives. Another example of the power they wield in the highest councils of major nations was their successful effort for the establishment of Israel. From the issuance of the Balfour Declaration (only very recently did the world learn that the author of it was actually a secret Jew)[34] to the founding and continuing support for Israel, to the Iraq War, they have shown the ability to get what they want.

Jewish supremacy has a hypocritical and a jealous nature. If the people among whom the Jewish supremacists reside would adopt programs of ethnic loyalty and solidarity similar to the Jewish supremacists, extremist Jews could obviously not exercise power and control, for they are only a small percentage of the population. Only when the ethnic and nationalist feelings of the host people are diminished can Jewish supremacists accumulate enough power to achieve their agenda. A clear pattern of Jewish influence in academia, government and media aims at weakening all ethnic solidarity and loyalty among their host peoples while purposely encouraging ethnic pride and solidarity among Jews. There is a concerted effort to weaken the group solidarity of Palestinians, Britons, Frenchmen, European-Americans, African-Americans and among Muslims in the Arab world. They seek any method to divide and weaken their enemies, as they are achieving their goal in the division of Iraq today. This pattern is also present within all nations wherever there are significant numbers of extremist Jews.

Divide and Conquer

Supremacist Jews fear and oppose all ethnic solidarity other than their own. In the Western nations they consistently oppose all organizations seeking to preserve the interests and heritage of Europeans. Likewise, in non-European nations, they consistently work to break down the solidarity and homogeneity of the prominent ethnic group. It is part of the Jewish supremacist modus operandi to foment diverse immigration and multiculturalism in every nation they reside in (except, of course, for Israel), as they see a squabbling, disunited society as easy prey to their intense and well-organized efforts at control. Dr. Stephen Steinlight, the former officer of the American Jewish Committee whom I quoted earlier, puts it in amazingly blunt terms:

For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agenda.[35]

In America, not only have they worked to weaken the solidarity of European-Americans, they actively opposed African American nationalist movements such as Marcus Garvey’s movement and the Nation of Islam. Those Black organizations simply desired to preserve their own heritage rather than assimilate into a multicultural society. Jewish supremacists hypocritically want no one other than themselves to be conscious of their own heritage and special interests. They try to make other groups feel guilty for even having pride in their own culture. They paint ethnic pride and cohesion in other peoples as supremacist or hateful.

A pertinent example of this divide and conquer method can be seen in Palestine and Lebanon. Most Palestinians and Lebanese are Muslim, but significant numbers are Christian. Israel has actively promoted hatred and civil war between Christians and Muslims in the Middle East. One of the reasons that Ariel Sharon arranged for the slaughter of Muslim refugees by the Lebanese Phalangist militia forces in 1982 was to promote bitter hatred and war among Israel’s Arab enemies. The diaries of one of Israel’s former Prime Ministers, Moshe Sharett, exposed the fact that this was one of Israel’s main tactics.[36] The destabilization of nations by encouraging massive multiracial and multi-religious immigration, as well as promotion of existing ethnic and religious divisions within nations, has been a long-practiced strategy of Jewish supremacists.

This attempt to break down their enemy’s ethnic solidarity can be explained in the context of the Palestinian people. If Israel’s displaced Palestinians fully assimilate in foreign lands with their host populations and thus lose their identity as Palestinians, they and their assimilated descendants are certainly not as likely to support the Palestinian cause. If Jewish populations do not assimilate, they are more likely to support the Jewish state.

While they attempt to break down other peoples’ ethnic loyalty, Jewish supremacist forces in the media sponsor a chronic recital of historical anti-Semitism. Such a focus has two objectives. First, it heightens Jewish solidarity and worldwide support for Israel, and secondly, it stimulates collective Jewish hatred for the Gentile world and thus lessens Jewish assimilation. The recital of Gentile perfidy against Jews also protects them from Gentile criticism, for if anyone dares to criticize Jewish supremacism, he is painted as morally equivalent to the perpetrators of the Holocaust. The official Holocaust story has assumed a religious stature, and if anyone questions a single line of the Holocaust scripture he becomes a modern heretic now referred to as a “denier.”

Another example of the hypocrisy of the Jewish supremacists can be seen in the intermarriage issue. During his campaign for President, George Bush found himself excoriated by the press for speaking at Bob Jones University, an institution that opposes interracial dating and marriage. Of course, during the campaign both George Bush and Al Gore made many obligatory speeches for many Jewish organizations. The irony is that every synagogue in America and every major Jewish organization vigorously opposes intermarriage of Jews with non-Jews. In Israel itself the marriage of a Jew or non-Jew is outlawed. Of course, this blatant double standard finds no mention in America’s supposedly fair and free press. Such exposure would not be good for Jewish public relations.

Of course, not all Jews are supremacist any more than all Germans were Nazis during the Hitler era, but the fact remains that organized Jewry has pursued a successful agenda that has amassed incredible power in modern times. With the creation of Israel, they have established the most ethnically supremacist nation on earth. Even more importantly, they have managed to acquire enormous power in many of the major governments of the world (especially the United States) and today they thoroughly dominate the world news and entertainment media. My well-documented chapter about the media will prove that their power is far greater than you might suspect.

Silencing Their Critics

The extent of Jewish power is precisely why the general public is unaware of it, for those who know it also know the high price they would pay for openly discussing it. In America, doing so can result in damage of one’s reputation, or even the loss of business or employment. Such truth telling can result in threats, intimidation and even physical attacks by groups such as the Jewish Defense League. The Anti-Defamation League is always busy accusing their critics of racial, religious or ethnic intolerance, while they defend and deny Israel’s blatant racism and supremacism. This Jewish supremacist group can ruin the business or the political career of almost anyone they choose.

Even more dangerously, Jewish supremacists have now been successful in imprisoning their critics in many European nations. They cannot as of yet freely assassinate their critics in Western countries as they have hundreds of Palestinian writers, poets and clerics across the Arab world. In today’s Europe, however, simply quoting the supremacist statements of Jewish leaders can land one in prison.

There are hundreds of dissidents in prison at this moment who dared to simply speak or write openly about Jewish ethnic intolerance. Although the media constantly allege that, unlike the Nazis, we have free speech, there are citizens of European nations right now in prison for simply questioning some Jewish versions of the Holocaust.

Jewish supremacists have made an intense effort to weaken the sense of ethnic awareness and loyalty among Europeans. In our modern media’s political correctness, it is considered “hate speech” for Europeans to speak about their love for their heritage and express their desire to preserve it. As a European-American, I do believe that my people have a right to preserve their way of life. At the same time I recognize that natural right for all the different peoples and nationalities of the Earth. For instance, how odd it is that the Palestinians, who have been ethnically cleansed from their own nation and denied their most basic human rights, are so often characterized as “anti-Semites” and “terrorists,” while the “anti-Gentile,” Jewish supremacists who have terrorized them and stolen their country are little criticized by the world press.

Palestinians and those in the Arab world need to understand that the source of their own plight comes from the fact that European-Americans have been prevented from defending their own national interests and heritage just as Palestinians have been so prevented. Palestinians will never find liberation in their nation until European-Americans find liberation in America from Jewish supremacism.

Although I am certainly an activist for European Americans, I respect and applaud every people who desire to preserve their own way of life and even more vitally, their very existence as an ethnic entity. To me, ethnic survival is the most basic of human rights. It also is a fundamental human right for people to live under a government and also a news and entertainment media that reflect their own basic values, traditions, social and economic interests. A nation under the power of an alien and destructive mass media is equally oppressed as one under the power of a foreign, occupying government.

The increasing globalism of the 21st Century, driven on by Jewish supremacists, will continue to decrease the choices and freedoms of all people. Moreover, it will endanger the preservation of individual cultures, traditions, values, religious beliefs and ethnic identities. The end result of globalism will be an enormous world government, one that will crush freedom and diversity as a steamroller would a flower.

The idea that government should represent its own people and not any foreign power is the driving principle of the Declaration of Independence and America’s nationhood: the right of a people to have a government of their own and for their own interests. The preamble to the Constitution of the United States puts it succinctly when it talks of a government “for ourselves and our posterity.”

In America, the Jewish domination of key United States government positions is amazing. During President Clinton’s administration, the leading Israeli newspaper, Maariv, described “warm Jews,” meaning Jews loyal to the interests of Israel, as holding critically important positions on the United States’ National Security Council. Maariv stated that 7 of its 11 members are “warm Jews.” [37]

Jewish Supremacism was primarily researched and written during the Clinton Administration, and as such offers a sliver of historical time. But, do not imagine that the inordinate Jewish power diminished under the administration of President George Bush. His presidency began with fewer Jews in the most visible positions, but the underlying government bureaucracy that spans different administrations is as Jewish as ever. A good example is Alan Greenspan who has served as chairman of the powerful Federal Reserve for many administrations of both parties. His replacement, probably the most powerful economic position in the entire world, was Ben Shalom Bernanke, a man who each day has privileged information that could easily enrich his extremist brethren by billions of dollars.

In the National Security Council there has been increasing Jewish consolidation from the first days of the Bush presidency. Richard Sale of UPI on February 28, 2003 wrote about Zionist Elliott Abrams: “A staff shake-up at the National Security Council is likely to mean the United States will take a harder pro-Israel stance in the Middle East…Elliott Abrams, the controversial former Reagan administration official who President Bush last December appointed to the NSC to take charge of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, has removed several staff members who were regarded as even-handed on the issue.”[38]

There are thousands of books and movies, many written, produced and marketed by supremacist Jews that condemn doctrines and movements of racial or ethnic supremacy among non-Jews. Few books, however, dare to examine the world’s oldest, most powerful and virulent form of ethnic supremacism: Jewish supremacism. The Jewish dominated mass media are filled with stories about the dangers of Muslim extremism. It seems that if these supremacist Jews were honest, they could better write about the supremacism they know the most about: their own. And my contention of course is that Jewish extremists are far more dangerous than Muslim extremists, in that they virtually have their fingers on the unimaginably horrific weapons of the world’s only superpower. In fact, they have used these weapons to support massive terror against a nation that did not attack us and did us absolutely no harm: the nation of Iraq.

Jewish Supremacism will show specifically how Jewish supremacists have used their political and media power to impose their will on American and other nations although their agenda clearly opposes the true interests of those nations. An excellent example is the Iraq War.

The Iraq War

It is no accident that the two nations most under the influence of Jewish supremacists, the United States and Britain, launched a military invasion against Iraq in March 2003. In going to war against Iraq, America fought against itself. It launched a war certain to cause more hatred and terrorism against the United States, cost hundreds of billions of dollars, and will inflict terrible damage to American economic and diplomatic interests at home and abroad. Even more importantly, it was a callous betrayal the brave fighting men of the American military who should never be put in harm’s way other than for the true security and freedom of the American people.

The most famous influential and long-time proponents of the war are the ardent Zionist extremists Richard Perle, chairman of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, and Paul Wolfowitz. Perle and his wife were also founders of JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security. Perle and a well-networked cabal of Jewish Neocons (neo-conservatives) became the primary propagandists for the war. They included many former prominent Marxists, such as Norman Podhoretz, who opposed the Vietnam War, but morphed into a conservative hawk for Israel. Podhoretz has served as editor of Commentary, the magazine of American Jewish Committee. Among the other Jewish Neocons were Scooter Libby, Elliot Cohen, Douglas Feith, Bill Kristol, David Wurmser, Elliott Abrams, Michael Ledeen, Michael Kagan, Daniel Blumenthal Michael Rubin, Paul Frum, Henry Kissinger and even the former Marxist and Black Panther supporter David Horowitz.

Back in 1996, Perle, Feith and Wurmser were behind a report entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. It called for war on Iraq not for the United States, but for securing Israel’s realm. It was written for the incoming Israeli Likud Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Once the Israelis decided to create an American war against Iraq, they then had to manufacture the rationale for the war, so they said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that Iraq had threatened America. The mass media collaborated. Of course, Israel was far guiltier of every alleged transgression than was Iraq. But, the Jewish supremacists in the media never would draw the obvious comparisons:

Why Go to War Against Iraq?

Iraq has weapons of mass destruction

Yet, Israel has one of the largest and most deadly arsenals of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons in the world.

Iraq tried to forestall UN inspectors.

Yet, Israel has never even allowed any inspections of its huge stockpile of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Israel blocked UN investigations of Israeli war crimes such as Sharon’s Sabra and Chatila massacre and the mass murder at Jenin.

Iraq had invaded and occupied its neighbor Kuwait.

Yet, Israel invaded and brutally occupied Lebanon for 18 years, killing over 20,000 civilians and destroying 100,000 homes.

Iraq had brutally occupied the Kurdish areas of Iraq.

Yet, Israel has militarily occupied the three million people of the West Bank and Gaza for 35 years, a brutal occupation that has killed and maimed tens of thousands of Palestinians, forced many into squalid concentration (refugee) camps, tortured hundreds of thousands in its prisons, and denied Palestinians of even the most elementary human rights.

Iraq was danger to the United States.

Yet, Iraq had never raised a finger against the United States, while Israel had a long record of terrorism and treachery against the United States such as in the Lavon Affair, attack on the U.S.S. Liberty and the Pollard spy case.

Iraq had violated UN resolutions such as UN Resolution 1441.

Yet, Israel had violated more than three times as many UN resolutions as Iraq, including many supported by the United States. For 35 years, Israel has violated UN Resolution 242 demanding a complete Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza.

If a case could be made for war against Iraq for the offenses claimed by the Jewish Neocons and the media, a far stronger case could be made for a war against Israel! The war against Iraq was an immoral, hypocritical war — a war fought for Israel and against every vital interest of the United States of America. It was a war that simply could not have been possible without the Jewish-supremacist domination of both the government and the media.

For simply mentioning the obvious role of the organized Jewish community behind the Iraq War, U.S. Congressman Jim Moran was actually forced to resign his Democratic leadership post. Associated Press on March 14, 2003, reports: “Rep. Jim Moran, D-Va., was forced out of his party leadership post Friday after a furor over his remarks about the role of American Jews in a possible war with Iraq.”[39] It is fascinating to see Jewish supremacists exercise their power at the very same moment they deny such power exists.

Defending the Rights of All People

I see the value of all people preserving their cultural, national and even genetic heritage. All peoples have the right to preserve their unique identities, including Jews. This book shows that much of the organized Jewish leadership pursues goals of self-preservation and self-advancement tenaciously, while consistently demonizing other nationalities and races who dare to act similarly in their own interests.

Their ultimate victory would cause not only the loss of freedom, but also the destruction of the diverse heritage and culture of all peoples on the earth. It is my hope that all of us, all nations and every people, while acknowledging our respective differences of religion, race, culture and nationality —will work together to defend ourselves from the one incredibly powerful supremacism that threatens us all.

Hypocritically, the same forces that support Jewish supremacism have accused me of being a “White supremacist.” I reject that epithet, for unlike Jewish supremacists, I don’t seek to rule over or control any other race; I simply want to preserve my own heritage. Recognizing that there are intrinsic differences in culture, behavior, tradition, and even genetics among the different races does not make one a supremacist. The belief that every people has the right to preserve its heritage and be free of control of others is not supremacism. It is the opposite of supremacism. Supremacism is when one group tries to control or be supreme over another. Jewish supremacists seek not only control over the Palestinian people and the Arab world, they seek supremacy in almost every nation in which they dwell.

One of the tactics that the Jewish supremacists have used against me and against this book is to claim that I am a White supremacist and a racist. They do this by constantly referring to my Ku Klux Klan membership as a young man. It is important to state here that I have not been involved with any Klan group for almost 30 years. Also, the organization I led was entirely legal and nonviolent. No member of my group as ever charged or even accused of violence against anyone.

When I left the organization almost thirty years ago, I stated clearly and publicly that I left because I did not want to be associated with an organization that had a media image of hatred or violence. Then as now, I say clearly that I condemn any person or any group that truly supports violence, terrorism or hatred, whether they be White, Black, Jewish or of any ethnic, racial or religious group.

Contrast my treatment in the media for my politically incorrect thoughts of thirty years ago to the treatment of those who committed great crimes against humanity such as Ariel Sharon of Israel, or media treatment of the many officials of murderous communist regimes who have returned to power in reformed communist states.

Even though journalists write about and interview former communists in the politics in both Western and Eastern Europe, seldom is one of them introduced as “former Communist.” Although men such as Nelson Mandela engaged in terrorist bombings as a young man, he is never introduced to the TV audience as Nelson Mandela, “former terrorist.” Although Ariel Sharon was found responsible even by an Israeli commission for the massacre of over 1200 Palestinian men, woman and children at Sabra and Chatila, he is not introduced as “War Criminal” Ariel Sharon.

Even though the media cannot say that I have ever harmed a single human being, the press often headlines, and almost always begins current news articles about me as David Duke, former KKK leader, and says nothing about my distinguished career in the 30 years since that time. I am not introduced with my proper title of Representative, as is normal for past Representatives, Senators and Presidents. They would choke rather than use my legitimate and hard-earned title of Dr. David Duke. They certainly don’t say bestselling author David Duke. It is as if former Klansman David Duke is on my birth certificate. Senator Robert Byrd is a former Klan leader who went on to vote for Israel hundreds of times in the Senate, is Senator Robert Byrd is not introduced as former Klansman Robert Byrd. George Bush is a former drug user. He is not introduced as George Bush, “former coke-head.”

Divulging this fact about my long ago past is legitimate, as it would be about any public person, but notice that when one is a friend of Zionism his controversial past becomes a footnote, but when one opposes Zionism his past becomes a headline. I truly believe that if in my political career I would have gone on to sell out America to the Jewish extremists and to Israel, the Jewish media condemnations would have been transformed to praise. I can see their accolades. Isn’t it great David Duke could overcome his past, they would say.

The press also does not mention the fact I actually won the 1988 Democratic Vice-Presidential Primary election in the State of New Hampshire with over 60 percent of the vote. In 1989 I ran as a Republican to win election to the House of Representatives in Louisiana. In a state of roughly the size and population of Austria, in races for Governor and for U.S. Senator I won over 60 percent of the European American vote in each election. In the race for President in 1992, I received more votes in some Republican primaries than a number of far better-financed sitting Republican senators. In 1996 I won election as a member of the Parish Executive Committee of the largest Republican district in Louisiana. The other 13 elected members later unanimously elected me as chairman where I served to 2000. I then spent some years in Eastern Europe and entered in the graduate program at the largest university in Ukraine, MAUP, where I received a full doctorate in History.

I have been invited to lecture at over 100 major universities and I have traveled the world speaking against the crimes of Zionism against the Palestinian and Mideast peoples, and the terrible damage done to the United States by the Zionist control of our foreign policy. I exposed the Israeli terrorist attacks against the United States in the Lavon Affair and in their the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty. I warned that that the treachery of Israeli agent Jonathan Pollard would be repeated, and long before 9/11, I said that America’s Israeli-dictated policies would lead to terrorism and great harm to the American people.

After 9/11 and before the start of the Iraq War, I exposed the obvious truth that Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction and that the Iraq War was being orchestrated by powerful Jewish extremists in the United States media and government.

In November 2002, just a few months before the start of the war, Newsweek magazine, Periscope Section, revealed that the United States State Department threatened to yank the media credentials of the Al Jazeera satellite news TV network if they dared to interview on a prime-time program. Al Jazeera courageously had me on anyway, but within a month I was informed that Zionist-extremist Michael Chertoff had authorized federal tax and financial charges against me. I spent 13 months in the American gulag (for more on this see chapter 11).

Far from breaking my spirit, imprisonment only rededicated me to my work, my education, and my writing and speaking out against the greatest threat to freedom and peace, International Zionism. Upon my release I finished my Doctorate and have since lectured at universities across Europe, America and the Middle East, and built on my controversial reputation as the best known anti-Zionist in the world.

At Harvard University, the respected J. F. Kennedy School of Government published a paper in 2006 by professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer titled “Israel and U.S. Foreign Policy.” Zionists such as Alan Dershowitz condemned it saying it was simply copied from my website and “could have been written by David Duke. “ Far from invalidating Walt and Mearsheimer, Dershowitz’s comments have only really confirmed the scholarship of my own work, for he shows that professors at the most prestigious university in the United States have now adopted my positions. You will see why in this book.

In 2006, I was invited to speak at the Holocaust Conference in Tehran, Iran. My speech centered on the vital need for freedom of speech on all issues, and the disgrace of the European laws that put people in prison for speaking their opinion and conscience. I met with Iran’s outspoken President, Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and saw first hand how the Zionist influenced media and government officials have raised passions for a catastrophic war against Iran by blatant lies in constant use of the “wipe Israel off the map” mistranslation.

I am committed to world peace, to freedom and independence for my own and indeed, all nations. All peoples have the right to preserve their unique heritages. Jewish supremacism remains the greatest threat to those ideals and to all peoples.

——————————————————

Much of this book is taken from my autobiography, My Awakening. It is an account of my personal journey of awakening to the reality of Jewish supremacism. You will find its real power in the many direct quotations from important Jewish sources, all of which I carefully document with hundreds of source notes for your reference.

Jewish Supremacism is a thesis in autobiographical form. It is the story of my awakening on the Jewish Question that began when I was a young man beginning in the late 1960s. Most of my fundamental understanding was in place by the end of that decade, but my knowledge has grown much deeper over the last 30 years. Since the 1960s, much new scientific and political material has become available. In recounting my awakening, I am not trying to give the reader the impression that all the materials or studies I cite were available in the 1960s. I weave into this narrative contemporary data and documentation so the reader has the benefit of the latest information. Also, for reasons of coherence and organization, I focus on one primary area of discovery at a time, while in life the acquisition of knowledge is not so neatly compartmentalized. The reader will find some repetition in Jewish quotes that I find particularly revealing. They are repeated when especially pertinent to more than one topic.

Also, I would be remiss not to add that when I write “I learned” or “I discovered,” I take no credit for original research, for my education on these subjects came from innumerable authors and their books and articles. I am in debt to them as well as to my many supporters and friends who have educated me with the insights and knowledge acquired in their own awakening. I assemble, organize, analyze and comment on materials collected by scholars and writers from ancient times to the present.

My preface finished, I must close my notebook and come down from Aspen Mountain. In doing so, I realize that I am not leaving the Natural World, for its laws continue in the world of human conflict below. The struggle for life and freedom exists among the different varieties of mankind as certainly as it does for every form of life and energy on this mountain.

Taking part in the struggle for my own people’s life and freedom is as natural as the flow of the crystal stream running down the mountain beside me. It is my hope that the European people, the Palestinian people and indeed, all peoples of the world, are permitted the most basic human right of all: to live — to preserve their own unique cultures, freedom and identity. To do so, they must resist the earth’s ultimate supremacism: Jewish supremacism.

I would be a fool not to realize the danger to my own life, reputation and freedom that I face by exposing Jewish supremacism. But, as a loyal European-American; as a patriotic citizen of the United States and also, as one who sincerely wishes for justice for all people of the world — my duty is clear.

So, coming down from Aspen Mountain, I see the stream next to me. It follows its course. So will I.

David Duke

Former Member of the House of Representatives

State of Louisiana, United States of America

——————————————————————————–

[1] New Republic. (1992). May 4.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky. (1999). Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. Pluto Press, p.B8-62

[4] Samuel, Michael. (1999) email sent to major organizations opposing government funding of Chabad Lubavitch religious center in Montreal. Oct. 23.

5 Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA) (2006) White House to Chabad: Bush won’t press Israel. June 27, 2006,

[6] Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy. Washington DC: Center for Immigration Studies. October.

[7] Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion. Boulder, Colorado. Pluto Press.

[8] KJV Deuteronomy 7:6

[9] Jub. 32:18 19

[10] KJV Joshua 6:21; KJV Joshua 10:37; RSV Deuteronomy 20:16

[11] RSV Deuteronomy 20:10-18

[12] KJV Leviticus 25:44-46.

[13] KJV Deuteronomy 7:2-3; Ezra 9:12

[14] RSV John 7:13.

[15] RSV 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16.

[16] Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, “Authority” p.637.

[17] New Republic. (1992). May.

[18] Simon, M. Trans. (1936). 57a Gittin. London. Soncino Press. p.261

[19] The Jewish Press. (1988). Feb. 19. 10A.

[20] The Jewish Press. (1988). Feb. 19. 8C.

[21] Bermant, C. (1991). Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen Words, Jewish Chronicle. May 17.

[22] Frank, Geyla (1997).

[23] Hertzberg, A. & Hirt-Manheimer, A. (1998). Relax. It’s Okay to be the Chosen People. Reform Judaism. May.

[24] Look Magazine. (1962). January 16.

[25] Begin, M. (1964). The Revolt: The Story of the Irgun. Tel-Aviv: Hadar Pub. p.162.

[26] Badi, J. (1960). Fundamental Laws of the State of Israel. New York. p.156.

[27] Reuters News Service (1998). Israelis Now Hold Worship Services
at Grave of Their Hero, Baruch Goldstein June 17

[28] New York Journal American (1949). February 3.

[29] Andelman, M.S. (1974). To Eliminate the Opiate. New York-Tel Aviv: Zahavia. Ltd. 26

[30] U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American Expeditionary Forces, June 9.

[31] U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American Expeditionary Forces, June 9.

[32] Francis, D. R. (1921). Russia From the American Embassy. New York: C. Scribner’s & Sons. p.214.

[33] Churchill, W. (1920). Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People. Illustrated Sunday Herald. February 8.

[34] Associated Press Online. (1999). Balfour Author Was a Jew.

[35] Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). Backgrounder. Center for Immigration Studies. October.

[36] Rokach, L. (1980). Israel’s Sacred Terrorism. Bellmont, Mass: Assoc. Arab American University Grads.

[37] Bar-Yosef, Avinoam. (1994). The Jews Who Run Clinton’s Court. Maariv. September 2.

[38] Sale, Richard. (2003). Staff Change Means Mideast Policy Shift. UPI article in Washington Times. February 28.

[39] Associated Press. (2003). Moran Forced to Quit Democratic Post. March 14.

The Genocide at Vinnitsa

By Dr. William Pierce
ADV Broadcast: RAM, MP3

We spoke a few weeks ago about the mass murder of the leadership stratum of the Polish nation by the Soviet secret police in the Katyn Forest in April 1940. We discussed that genocidal atrocity in the light of the ongoing Jewish campaign to portray Jews as the principal victims of the Second World War and to collect reparations from the rest of the world today. A good deal of interest in that broadcast was expressed by listeners, many of whom had not been acquainted previously with the facts of the Katyn atrocity. Today I will explore this general subject further. I will tell you about the fate of the Ukrainian nation at the hands of the Soviet secret police.

In 1943 Germany was at war against the Soviet Union. Twenty-five years earlier, at the end of the First World War, when communist revolutionaries were attempting to take over Germany, Adolf Hitler had sworn to devote his life to fighting communism. He was only a corporal at the time, recuperating from his war wounds in a military hospital, but 15 years later, in 1933, he became chancellor of Germany, and in 1941 his army invaded the Soviet Union with the aim of destroying Soviet communism. The German Army pushed far into the Soviet empire and liberated all of Ukraine from the communists.

In May 1943 units of the German Army were stationed in the Ukrainian city of Vinnitsa, a community of 100,000 persons in a primarily agricultural district. Ukrainian officials in Vinnitsa told the Germans that five years earlier the NKVD — the Soviet secret police, very similar to our FBI — had buried the bodies of a number of executed political prisoners in a city park. The Germans investigated, and within a month they had dug up 9,439 corpses from a number of mass graves in the park and a nearby orchard.

Unlike the Poles murdered in the Katyn Forest, all of these bodies found at Vinnitsa were those of civilians, most of them Ukrainian farmers or workers. The bodies of the men all had their hands tied behind their backs, like the Polish officers at Katyn. Although the men’s bodies were clothed, the bodies of a number of young women were naked. All of the victims had been shot in the back of the neck with a .22 caliber pistol, the trademark of the NKVD executioners.

The Germans called in an international team of forensic pathologists to examine the bodies and the mass graves. The international team, which included pathologists from Belgium, France, Netherlands, and Sweden, as well as from several countries allied with Germany, examined 95 mass graves and conducted a number of autopsies.

Including the autopsies already performed by Ukrainian medical personnel in Vinnitsa, 1,670 of the corpses were examined in detail. The identities of 679 of them were established either through documents found in their clothes or through recognition by relatives, who flocked to Vinnitsa from the surrounding countryside when they heard that the graves had been uncovered.

The authorities estimated that in addition to the 9,439 bodies exhumed, there were another 3,000 still in unopened mass graves in the same area. The international team concluded that all of the victims had been killed about five years earlier — that is, in 1938. Relatives of the victims who were identified all testified that the victims had been arrested by the NKVD in 1937 and 1938. The relatives had been told that those arrested were “enemies of the people” and would be sent to Siberia for 10 years. None of the relatives had any idea what the reason was for the arrests and testified that those arrested had committed no crimes and were engaged in no political activity. As I said earlier, nearly all of the victims were farmers or workers, although there were a few priests and civil servants among them.

By interviewing a large number of people who had some knowledge of what had happened in Vinnitsa and the surrounding region in 1938, the Germans were able to piece together the following picture. In 1937 and 1938 gangs of the NKVD’s jackbooted thugs roamed the villages and towns of Ukraine, arresting people in a pattern that seemed almost random to observers. One victim’s wife reported that as the NKVD goons dragged her husband away they said only, “Hey, you dog! You’ve lived too long.” Other observers thought they saw a pattern. A Ukrainian who was renting a part of his house to a Jewish lawyer refused to sell the whole house to the Jew when he offered to buy it at an unreasonably low price. A few weeks later the Ukrainian homeowner was arrested by the NKVD. Another Ukrainian who had threatened to beat up a minor communist functionary who made a crude pass at his sister was arrested shortly thereafter. It seemed that many of the arrests were the settling of personal scores and that anyone who had crossed a Jew was especially likely to be arrested.

All of this was nothing new for Ukrainians. They had borne the brunt of the communization the Soviet Union for nearly two decades. Ukraine was primarily an agricultural nation, a nation of farmers and villagers, and as such was regarded with suspicion by the Jews and the urban rabble who filled the ranks of the Communist Party. The communists championed the urban workers, but they wasted no love on farmers and villagers, who tended to be too independent and self-sufficient for communist tastes.

During the civil war which followed the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, the Ukrainians wanted to opt out. Ukrainian nationalists wanted no part of the Soviet Union. In 1921 and 1922 the Red Army occupied Vinnitsa, and Ukrainians were butchered wholesale by the Reds in order to kill the Ukrainian nationalist spirit. The craving for Ukrainian independence nevertheless kept flaring up, and further massacres followed, notably in 1928.

Ukraine was the stronghold of the kulaks, the independent farmers and small landowners, always regarded with special hatred by the communist bosses. Stalin gave the job of exterminating the kulaks to his right-hand man in the Kremlin, Lazar Moiseivich Kaganovich, known later as the “Butcher of Ukraine.” Kaganovich, the most powerful Jew in the Soviet Union, supervised the collectivization of Ukrainian farms, beginning in 1929. To break the spirit of the kulaks, the Ukraine was subjected to an artificial famine. The NKVD and Red Army troops went from farm to farm, confiscating crops and livestock. The farmers were told that the food was needed for the workers in the cities. None was left for the farmers. And in 1933 and 1934 seven million Ukrainians died of starvation, while Kaganovich watched and gloated from the Kremlin.

Perhaps in 1937 and 1938 the bosses in the Kremlin simply thought that it was time to apply the lash to the Ukrainians again. In any event, the NKVD was given the task this time. The NKVD was even more Jewish than the rest of the Soviet communist apparatus.

The commissar of the NKVD until September 1936 had been the Jew Genrikh Yagoda, and he had staffed his instrument of terror and repression with Jews at every level. And those who were not Jews were the worst sort of Russian and Ukrainian rabble, the resentful louts and ne’er-do-wells who saw in communism a way to get even with their betters. In any event, the Ukrainians were fully aware of the preponderance of Jews in the secret police, and they suspected that there was a Jewish angle to the pattern of arrests in 1937 and 1938. And indeed, it did seem as if the Talmudic injunction to “kill the best of the Gentiles” were being followed, for those who were arrested seemed to be the most solid, the steadiest, the most reliable and irreproachable of the Ukrainians.

Thirty thousand were arrested in the Vinnitsa region alone, and most of these eventually were sent to the NKVD prison in the city of Vinnitsa. This prison had a normal capacity of 2,000 prisoners, but during 1937 and 1938 it was packed most of the time with more than 18,000 prisoners. Throughout much of 1938 a few dozen prisoners were taken from the prison each night and driven to a nearby NKVD motor pool area. There their hands were tied behind their backs and they were led, one at a time, a few hundred feet to a concrete slab in front of a garage. The slab was used for washing vehicles, and it had a drain at one side with an iron grating over it. Just as the prisoners reached the edge of the slab they were shot in the back of the neck, so that when they fell onto the concrete their blood would run into the drain. This was what the NKVD men jokingly called “mokrii rabota” — “wet work” — and they had had plenty of experience at “wet work.” A truck parked next to the slab kept its engine racing so that the noise of the engine would cover the sound of the shots. While the next prisoner was being led up, a couple of NKVD men would throw the corpse of the previous prisoner into the truck. When the night’s quota of victims had been murdered the truck would drive off with its load of corpses to the fenced-in park or to the nearby orchard, where new graves already were waiting. And this “wet work” went on night after night, month after month.

So why is this gruesome story important to us now? After all, this massacre of Ukrainians in Vinnitsa took place 60 years ago. I’ll tell you why it’s still important to us, aside from the fact that these Ukrainians were our people, our kinfolk, part of our race.

First, you might ask yourself why you have never before heard about Vinnitsa, and I’m sure that’s the case for about 99 per cent of our listeners. Of course, Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote about what happened at Vinnitsa, in the third volume of his Gulag Archipelago, but you’re not likely to find that in the rack at the checkout counter. And Ukrainians and Germans have written about it, although for the most part their writings have never been published in English, because publishers in this country understand that it would be Politically Incorrect to publish anything about Vinnitsa. Much better that people just forget about it.

Isn’t that odd, though, when we continually hear so much about Auschwitz? Isn’t it odd that when Jewish groups are using their political influence to have laws passed in a number of states requiring high school students to take courses about the so-called “Holocaust,” what happened at Katyn or at Vinnitsa is never mentioned in high school? The excuse given for requiring students to study the so-called “Holocaust” is that it was the greatest crime in history, and we should know about it so that we won’t repeat it. But then why shouldn’t we learn about Katyn and Vinnitsa and Dresden and a thousand other atrocities where our people were the victims, and so the lesson should be even more pertinent for us?

You know, I’m not trying to be cute about this. We all know the answers to these questions, but I just want you to think about their significance. To them, Auschwitz is important because Jews died there, and Vinnitsa is not important, because only Gentiles were killed there. The Jewish media bosses keep rubbing our noses in Auschwitz, because they want us to feel guilty, they want us to feel that we owe the Jews something for letting it happen. The Jewish media bosses never mention Vinnitsa because Jews were the guilty ones there. Besides, they make a lot of money by promoting the “Holocaust.” It’s certainly not going to help their profits to divide the attention and the sympathy of the American public between Auschwitz and Vinnitsa. And it’s certainly not going to help their effort to extort billions of dollars in “Holocaust” reparations from the Swiss and from everyone else to admit their own guilt at Katyn and Vinnitsa.

Think about it! If Poles controlled the news and entertainment media in America, we’d hear a great deal more about Katyn, I suspect. If Germans controlled our media we’d hear much more about the terror bombing of Dresden. And if Ukrainians controlled our media, every high school student would know about Vinnitsa. But it’s the Jews who control our media, and so all we hear about is Auschwitz: never even a whisper about Vinnitsa. That’s important. We ought to be concerned about that. We ought to be concerned whenever any part of our history is suppressed, is hidden from us. We ought to find out why. It might help us to make sure that what happened to us at Vinnitsa never happens to us again.

I’m sure that you’ve all heard the maxim that the best defense is a strong offense. Do you remember the persecution all through the 1980s of John Demjanjuk, the retired Cleveland auto worker whom the Jews accused of being “Ivan the Terrible”? John Demjanjuk* is a Ukrainian who came to America after the Second World War. In 1978 the Jews made a big hullabaloo about Demjanjuk being a guard in a German prison camp during the war, and the U.S. government obediently hauled him to court and stripped him of his citizenship. Then he was handed over to the Jews for crucifixion and deported to Israel. The mass media in America were full of sensational stories for 15 years about Ivan the Terrible and how the Ukrainians had helped the Germans persecute the poor, innocent Jews. Unfortunately, this strategy worked for the Jews. The Ukrainians kept their heads down instead of raising the issue of Vinnitsa. Of course, even if they had begun trying to tell Americans about Vinnitsa or about what Kaganovich had done to the Ukrainian kulaks, who would have heard them? Ukrainians don’t own the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, Time magazine, Newsweek magazine, or U.S. News & World Report. The Jews own all of those media. And the Ukrainians don’t own Hollywood, so they can’t make movie dramas about Vinnitsa either, like Steven Spielberg does about the so-called “Holocaust.”

The crux of this matter is that the Jews have been getting away with presenting a grossly distorted version of history to us, a version in which they are the completely innocent victims, and our people, the Ukrainians and Poles and Germans are the bad guys who have been persecuting the poor Jews for no reason at all. They’ve been pumping out this propaganda in concert, consciously and deliberately, without a single major medium under their control deviating from their party line. And people try to tell me that, well, the Jews may control the media, but they don’t conspire with each other. Baloney!

And because they’ve been getting away with giving us a falsified version of history, they’ve been able to change America’s foreign and domestic policies in directions to suit themselves, to our enormous disadvantage. Everything which has happened in the Middle East, for example, since the Second World War is based on this false history.

More than that, everything that has happened in Europe since the murder of 12,000 Ukrainians at Vinnitsa in 1938 has been based on the Jews’ power to control what we learn about our history, about what is happening and has happened in the world around us. The U.S. government allied itself with the Soviet government in 1941 for the purpose of destroying Germany. The communists were presented to the American public as the good guys, as worthy allies, and the Germans were presented as the bad guys. And the American public bought that lie because they didn’t know about Vinnitsa or about a thousand other atrocities committed against our people by the communists.

When the Germans brought in the international commission to examine the graves in Vinnitsa in 1943, the Jew-controlled media kept the news from the American people, just the way they kept the news about the Katyn Forest genocide away from the American people. And because of this, there was no real opposition to turning half of Europe over to the communists at the end of the Second World War.

If Katyn and Vinnitsa had been publicized, so that every American voter knew in detail what the NKVD had done at Katyn and at Vinnitsa, the politicians in Washington never would have been able to get away with turning the Poles and the Hungarians and the Rumanians and the Bulgarians and the Croats and the Serbs and the Czechs and the Slovaks and the Baltic peoples and all of the Germans in the eastern part of Germany over to these communist butchers. The politicians in Washington got away with this not just because they were in the pockets of the Jews, but because the American people weren’t given the truth. And because we weren’t given the truth millions more of our people died at the hands of the NKVD after the war, and all of eastern Europe was plundered by the communists for 50 years, and there was a Korean War and a Vietnam War — which there wouldn’t have been if we hadn’t kept the communist empire alive because of our own ignorance, because of the lies we’d been told about what happened in Europe. We lost more than 100,000 of our best young men in the Korean and Vietnam wars alone.

So you see, it is important what the public is told. It is important that our people know the truth about our history, even about things which happened 60 years ago. And I intend to do everything I can to give them the truth.

Now I believe that you can understand why the Jews try so hard to keep me off the air, why they bring pressure against every radio station which carries American Dissident Voices. They are desperate to keep the American people in the dark about Vinnitsa and Katyn and their other crimes. And I am determined to tear down the curtain of silence and darkness and give truth and light to our people.

And there is some urgency about this, because the Jews are continuing to push for laws against what they call “hate speech” — which means any speech which contradicts their lies. They have succeeded in getting such laws passed in other countries. If I tried to make this broadcast in Canada or Britain, for example, the police would arrest me and shut down the station before I could finish. Let’s not let that happen in America.

INCOG MAN NOTES

One of my favorite pro-White writers, Dr. Pierce died in 2002.

The Jews hate this guy and constantly brand him the usual Nazi slanders. Pierce was way too effective of a writer for them to ignore. When one of his fictional novels (The Turner Diaries) turned up in the possesion of Timothy McVeigh, the Jews went overboard in the media (like the History Channel) to use that as some kind of “proof” that Pierce was a violent threat. That’s how the Jew operates. Now, think a minute on how the Jews use violence in Hollywood. Who has had more negative effect?

The 89 year-old man, confined to a wheelchair, being hauled away for a German trial. Can you believe “our” government did this?
* John Demjanjuk is now once again being tried for his life in Germany. After a nightmare trial and conviction by Jews in Israel, Congressman Jim Traficant and son-in-law Ed Nishnic brought forth evidence that proved conclusively he was not the man. The Israeli Supreme court was forced to let him go, much to their displeasure, I’m sure.

But Jew harpies elsewhere still refused to give up persecuting the old guy and came up with more lying BS evidence to get some kind of vengence on somebody. As is usual with the Jews, they even invented some crazy number of ”victims” out of thin air to pin on him (29,000 even). The Zionist-corrupted US government has continued to help these unbelievably spiteful Jews every step of the way and the Jew media stays silent about this blatant injustice against some frail old man and citizen of the US.

 
Read more here: Demjanjuk Fights for his Life

 
Article with Comment Section at INCOG MAN

‘When we allow the rights of one American to be violated, we endanger the rights of all Americans’

By Jim Traficant — AFP

John Demjanjuk is a retired auto worker from Cleveland. He was born in Ukraine, served in World War II as a Russian soldier, was captured and held as a prisoner of war. Demjanjuk’s captors were soldiers of the German army. Today, as you read this column, Demjanjuk is standing trial for his very life once again. He is facing another Nazi war crimes indictment.

Think about the dynamics of this dilemma for John Demjanjuk. He’s being tried in Germany, by the very country who captured him. They say he was a Nazi war criminal. I don’t know about you, but on its surface it just doesn’t add up.

Demjanjuk is not a war criminal and certainly was never a Nazi. I can remember my first acknowledgment of the “Demjanjuk” ordeal. It seems like yesterday. I was in my Washington, D.C. office in the old Cannon Building in the late ‘80s. One of my staffers came into my office in a sort of cloak-and-dagger mode stating that the “son of convicted Nazi mass murderer ‘Ivan the Terrible’ is in the reception room, and we told him you are not here.” I then inquired of his purpose to meet with me, since I was not his congressman. I was then informed that young John Demjanjuk Jr. told them that he has “been to every office in the House and Senate, and no one would even speak with him because the matter was too sensitive.”

John Demjanjuk Jr. further stated that “they did not want to involve Jim Traficant” because they said that they “knew the government hated him, but he’s our last resort for any help.”

My staffer said, “Do not meet with him; you’ll be ostracized, destroyed, ruined. Let him go back to his own congressman and the two senators of Ohio.”

My staff further advised that I was probably already targeted by the powerful Israeli lobby, since I was an opponent of foreign aid, and certainly my involvement with John Demjanjuk would guarantee that American Israeli Public Affairs Committee [AIPAC] would not quit till I was removed from Congress.

I went to the door so I could overhear the conversation between John Demjanjuk Jr. and my staff. I could feel the pain in his voice. John Demjanjuk Jr. finally stated: “My dad’s not asking to meet with anyone. I’m asking, and I’ve never even had a parking ticket. What kind of government is this, that I can’t even talk to my elected officials about my family’s grave concerns?”

I then ordered my staff to bring John Demjanjuk Jr. and his brother-in-law Ed Nishnic into my office. My staff told me this decision would destroy my career in Congress. I met John Demjanjuk Jr. and Ed Nishnic and offered them a seat to discuss their problems.

John Demjanjuk Jr. is a fine young man, a son any father would be proud of. His demeanor was that of a troubled and worried young man. He was accompanied by his brother-in-law Ed Nishnic and basically let Ed Nishnic explain their plight.

Ed Nishnic is also a remarkable man. Like John Demjanjuk Jr. he’s very intelligent and was very determined to prove the innocence of his father-in-law. I stated emphatically, that “I’ve decided to meet with you for one reason and one reason only: No American should ever be turned away when seeking help from our government.” I then said, “Your dad has been convicted of mass murder, the extermination of one million Jewish prisoners. He has been sentenced to death. I want you to know up front, that if he is really guilty I could personally pull the switch at his execution.”

I then told them I would hear their concerns. (Be advised that the mainstream media wrote that “Jim Traficant supports Nazi mass murderer” as soon as word spread that I had met with the “Demjanjuk” family.)

Nishnic handed me two report summaries of OSI investigators (Office of Special Investigations, the group within the Justice Department created by Congress to apprehend and prosecute Nazi war criminals). They had interrogated one Otto Horn in Berlin, Germany. Horn was a former SS Nazi guard who had assisted “Ivan Grozny” (Ivan the Terrible), at the Treblinka, Poland concentration camps.

These two reports were originals, not copies, and were signed by agents Garand and Daugherty, and were witnessed by prosecutor Moscovitz, who handled the denaturalization trial of John Demjanjuk in Cleveland. The reports were stamped as received by the Justice Department and signed by unit chief Eli Rosenbaum.

I read the documents very carefully without input from John Demjanjuk Jr. or Ed Nishnic. I could not believe my eyes. I could not believe what I was reading. The Justice Department had committed a great crime. Moscovitz, Garand and Daugherty suborned the perjury of Otto Horn in order to convict an American citizen wrongfully—an American now denaturalized, stripped of his citizenship and waiting to be executed. (The authenticity of these two documents cannot be denied.)

At trial, Horn stated that “John Demjanjuk was Ivan Grozny.” But in these two early reports, two years before the trial, Horn could not identify Demjanjuk from the photographs displayed before him.

I had a problem. A big problem. I knew without a doubt that John Demjanjuk was not Ivan the Terrible. John Demjanjuk was in fact another victim, soon to be known as one of the most vicious and infamous mass murderers in world history. John Demjanjuk was awaiting execution as the infamous Ivan of Treblinka, Ivan the Terrible.

I would be defamed and ostracized because I would be compelled to prove the innocence of John Demjanjuk on the strength of these two Justice Department documents. John Demjanjuk was innocent—convicted of mass murder, sentenced to death and awaiting execution—and no one seemed to care.

I thought, what has happened to our great country that it could produce this type of brutal crime against this American and his family?

I realized I had a difficult task ahead, but with the help of John Demjanjuk Jr. and Ed Nishnic, I believed we could prove John Demjanjuk’s innocence. It was imperative to do so. I had these two powerful documents to start with.

Otto Horn’s testimony at the Cleveland denaturalization trial (via videotape) was very direct. Horn had been shown a series of photographs when interrogated in Berlin.

Moscovitz spread eight photos of Caucasian males in uniform, all in their early 20’s. Horn testified that he identified John Demjanjuk immediately. Moscovitz then spread eight more photos of Caucasian soldiers in uniform, but now in their 40’s. Horn again testified that he identified John Demjanjuk, even as an older man, because he knew him so well. Horn’s testimony stripped John Demjanjuk of his citizenship, and he was sent to Israel to stand trial as Ivan the Terrible.

Now, back to the two reports of Horn’s interrogation in Berlin two years earlier. Garand and Daugherty wrote in their reports immediately after their interview with Horn: “We spread eight photos of Caucasian men in uniform, all in their early 20’s. Horn studied the photos at length and stated that ‘one man looks familiar’ [not John Demjanjuk] but FAILED to identify anyone.”

The report goes on:

“We then gathered the eight photos and put them in a stack with John Demjanjuk’s on top. We then spread eight more photos of older men in uniform with John Demjanjuk’s photo among them. Horn studied these photos at length, and looking at the John Demjanjuk photo on top of the stack, then back to John Demjanjuk’s photo in the older soldiers spread, said that ‘this is the same man’ but FAILED again to identify John Demjanjuk as Ivan.”

Be advised that Horn lied through his teeth, and U.S. prosecutor Moscovitz allowed it. Horn later testified at the Israeli trial that he positively identified John Demjanjuk from the photo spreads. When the defense team crossed-examined Horn, they asked if he could see the first photo spread when he was examining the second set. Horn testified:

“They put the first set of photographs in an envelope and removed them from my view.” Horn lied again. John Demjanjuk was convicted, and sentenced to death.

I immediately began my own investigation by utilizing a number of FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] requests on John Demjanjuk. The government response was “classified”; thus I got nothing. At this point I conferred with John Demjanjuk Jr. and Nishnic to evaluate what options were available. We came up with a plan.

We decided to research any and all legal activity that involved the Treblinka camp. BINGO. We discovered that a Ukrainian-American from Chicago, by the name of Feodor Federenko, had been tried for war crimes at Treblinka. Federenko was acquitted. He then traveled to his homeland to visit his family, but was arrested by the Soviet KGB, was tried again in Russia, was convicted and executed. [No doubt our government arranged his demise].

I immediately sent out a new FOIA request, this time on Federenko. Most agencies threw my FOIAs in the wastebasket, but the State Department sent me two telegrams:

The first was from one of our OSI agents in Europe seeking information about Treblinka. The second was the response from the State Department listing the names of four men who had made statements about Treblinka. At the bottom of this was the following; “if you need further help, be advised we have another 100 pages in the file.”

I acted immediately. I phoned the State Department and reached a Mrs. Poindexter, an honest, competent government worker. I asked her to send me those 100 pages, citing the fact that Federenko was deceased and his case was not “classified.” Mrs. Poindexter complied.

Those 100 pages saved the life of John Demjanjuk. They contained the testimony of 17 witnesses about Treblinka.

All 17 identified “Ivan”:

1. He was taller than John Demjanjuk;

2. He had dark hair, not blond like John Demjanjuk;

3. He was nine years older than John Demjanjuk;

4. He had a long scar on his neck.

There was also a photo of two SS Nazi guards who had been identified by one of the witnesses, who said: “The short guard with pistol is Tkachuk. The tall guard is the man the Jewish prisoners feared the most, ‘Ivan Grozny’—IVAN MARCHENKO.”

All 17 witnesses identified a man named Ivan Marchenko as “Ivan the Terrible.”

I asked Congress for a hearing. Congress refused, the case was “too sensitive.” The federal courts would not accept my evidence. I took my evidence to the floor of Congress. I said John Demjanjuk was not “Ivan the Terrible.” A man named Ivan Marchenko was the real “Ivan.”

That night, the U.S. Justice Department issued a statement that “there were two Ivans.”

The next day I released the photo of Marchenko. The Justice Department was silent.

I then forwarded all my evidence to John Demjanjuk’s defense team in Israel, who then submitted it in to the Israeli Supreme Court.

I flew to Israel with John Demjanjuk Jr. and Ed Nishnic, at my own expense. I did a live interview with Bryant Gumbel on the Today show. I stated that if Israel executed John Demjanjuk that Israel will lose $20 billion a year from U.S. taxpayers. Gumbel said that “Israel only gets $3 billion a year.” I countered, “That’s just the foreign aid bill, Bryant. Israel gets military aid, loans, loans converted to grants, and trade compacts and other money. I say that Israel gets $20,000 for every man, woman and child from America every year.”

The interview was over.

I was phoned the following night and was told that John Demjanjuk would be released and delivered to me at the Tel Aviv Airport. We took him home.

I called a press conference for New York. While the press gathered, I ducked out with John Demjanjuk on a small plane. When approaching Cleveland, I directed the pilot to seek a landing pattern at the airport, then directed the flight to a small airstrip near Independence, Ohio, thus eluding the press.

John Demjanjuk went to a safehouse, He was home. I flew toWashington.The next day the Sixth Circuit Court in Cincinnati, Ohio issued the following statement; “A TRAGIC BUT HONEST MISTAKE BY OUR GOVERNMENT.”

That was no mistake. Moscovitz, Garand and Daugherty should have been sent to prison. I said then, “Since when did sensitivity waive our Bill of Rights?” When we allow the rights of one American to be violated, we endanger the rights of all Americans.

Germany should send John Demjanjuk home. How, in God’s name, can Germany accept any evidence from the U.S. Justice Department who suborned perjury in the first trial, withheld evidence, obstructed justice, and violated John Demjanjuk’s civil rights?

SHAME ON GERMANY AND SHAME ON THE U.S.A. What has happened to our great country?

James A. (Jim) Traficant, Jr. was born in Youngstown, Ohio on May 8, 1941. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Pittsburgh, where he was a well-known football star. He also received a M.S. degree from Youngstown State University in 1976. For ten years he served as executive director of the Mahoning County (Ohio) Drug Program and from 1981-1985 he served as sheriff of Mahoning County, prior to his election to the U.S. Congress as a Democrat in 1984. He was re-elected by overwhelming margins every year up until 2002 when, following his conviction on trumped up corruption charges, he was expelled from the House of Representatives. Despite his conviction and expulsion and being sent to prison for a seven year term Traficant still won 15% of the vote running for re-election to the House in the 2002 election as an independent. He recently completed a seven-year prison sentence, having refused to seek a pardon or clemency, refusing to admit to or apologize for crimes he did not commit.

 
Subscribe to American Free Press. Online subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK – HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR – By Michael Piper.

Print subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six free issues of Whole Body Health: $59 Order on this website or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS.

Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute – as long as full credit is given to American Free Press – 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003

 
Article Source: American Free Press

Democrat Congressman Gave Secrets To Israel

The Right Perspective

Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds has testified before Congress that the late California congressman Tom Lantos disclosed “highest level” intelligence and weapons technology to both Israel and Turkey.

Edmonds made headlines in the wake of September 11, 2001 after she came forward with claims that Bush Administration officials Douglas Feith and Richard Perle helped pass defense secrets to foreign agents, or provided names of knowledgeable Pentagon officials who were vulnerable to blackmail or co-option, during the 1990’s.

Feith became head of the Office of Special Plans, and Perle would become chairman of the Defense Advisory Board during the Bush Administration.

Edmonds’ claims quickly became bogged down in partisan bickering as some Democrats used the revelations to attack neo-conservatives and the new Republican administration.

However, her August 8th testimony circumvents that by including the powerful Democrat congressman, who just happened to be a Holocaust survivor, as well as the American-Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC), a bi-partisan group, in the espionage scandal.

“They were 100 percent directly involved,” Edmonds told Military.com. “They were not in the Pentagon [in the late 1990s] but they had their people inside the Pentagon.” One of those people, she said, was Larry Franklin, an Air Force officer assigned to the Office of Special Plans who, in 2003, passed classified information to representatives of the American Israel Public Affairs Office, or AIPAC. By then Feith was leading the OSP.

According to Military.com:

Edmonds, who has degrees from George Washington University and George Mason University, speaks Turkish, Farsi, and Azerbaijani. She got into the world of FBI investigations and counter-intelligence after 9/11, when the FBI contacted her about coming to work as a Turkish translator. In short order she was on the job and translating documents going as far back as the mid-90s, as well as assisting special agents in the field who were monitoring both “foreign entities” and the public officials linked to them.

But not long after she joined the bureau another Turkish translator came on board – Malec Can Dickerson. And in December 2001 Dickerson and her husband, Douglas, then an Air Force major, tried to recruit her to join American Turkish Council — an organization that was actually being monitored by the FBI. Also, according to Edmonds, Douglas Dickerson had previously worked with Grossman in Turkey and, though assigned to the Defense Intelligence Agency, was working for Feith’s OSP and also as a coordinator with the State Department on the Turkey Republics in Central Asia.

Edmonds reported the attempted recruitment, but no action was taken. She said she soon found evidence that Malec Can Dickerson included false information on her FBI job application. Again, no response from officials, she said.

When the FBI finally did act, in March 2002, it was to fire her. When she appealed her termination and eventually sued, the Justice Department, then under John Ashcroft, invoked a “state’s secret’ privilege to prevent her from talking about what she knew. When Sens. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, looked into her case and found it credible, Ashcroft invoked the same gag order on them.

The Justice Department’s own Inspector General’s report was barred from release by Ashcroft, though when an unclassified version finally became available in 2005 it concluded that “many of Edmonds’s core allegations relating to the co-worker [Malec Can Dickerson] had some basis in fact and were supported by either documentary evidence or witnesses other than Edmonds.” And though the Justice Department’s IG found the evidence didn’t prove that the co-worker had disclosed classified information, it said the FBI should have investigated the claims more thoroughly.

…And the Defense Department wasn’t the only power center targeted by foreign agents and their U.S. helpers, she says. On Capitol Hill, she said, the late congressman Rep. Tom Lantos, D-Calif., disclosed “highest level” intelligence and weapons technology to both Israel and Turkey.

Both Feith and Perle denounced Edmonds as “bizarre” and a “nutcase”. Defense Department spokesman Lt. Col. Eric Butterbaugh said any investigation into the allegations would be carried out by the FBI, although the bureau would not confirm or deny the existence of any such investigation.

 
Article Source: The Right Perspective

(Uses Flash media.  If you have trouble, the URL is here, or here.)

Part Two

Part Three (Traficant was allowed no visitors for seven years, not even from his wife.)

James Traficant successfully defended John Demjanjuk in 1993 when Demjanjuk was falsely accused of being “Ivan the Terrible”.  The price for this, Traficant was railroaded and imprisoned seven years on false charges of racketeering, tax evasion, and taking bribes, an accusation of which he maintains his innocence.

From the one of the enclosed YouTube links:

James Traficant has come out of prison spewing conspiracy theories about Israel. The former Ohio Democratic congressman — who was released last week after serving seven years for racketeering, bribery, obstruction of justice and tax evasion — told Fox News Channel’s Greta Van Susteren that Israel has a “powerful stranglehold on the American government.”

From a transcript of the interview, where Traficant is charging that he’s being targeted (although it’s not clear by whom) for defending accused Nazi war criminal John Demjanjuk:

TRAFICANT: … But I believe that Israel has a powerful stranglehold on the American government. They control both members of the House, the House and the Senate. They have us involved in wars in which we have little or no interest. Our children are coming back in body bags. Our nation is bankrupt over these wars. And if you open your mouth, you get targeted. And if they don’t beat you at the poll, they’ll put you in prison.

VAN SUSTEREN: All right, two quick things. One is the Israelis have released Demjanjuk back to the United States, right?

TRAFICANT: The Israeli supreme court. And I give them credit.

VAN SUSTEREN: Give them credit for that.

TRAFICANT: I give them credit, big-time.

VAN SUSTEREN: All right. The second thing is, is Israel is a democracy and is our ally, right?

TRAFICANT: Yes, they are.

VAN SUSTEREN: So, you have no…

TRAFICANT: And they should be our ally. They are our friends over in that troubled part of the world.

VAN SUSTEREN: OK. So, explain to me what you see as — you know, why you target or why you have a grudge against the Israelis.

TRAFICANT: The grudge is not necessarily a grudge. It’s an objective assessment that no one will have the courage to speak about. They’re controlling much of our foreign policy. They’re influencing much of our domestic policy. Wolfowitz as undersecretary of defense manipulated President Bush number two back into Iraq. They’ve pushed definitely, definitely to try to get Bush before he left to move into Iran. We’re conducting the expansionist policy of Israel and everybody’s afraid to say it. They control much of the media, they control much of the commerce of the country, and they control powerfully both bodies of the Congress. They own the Congress.

VAN SUSTEREN: Are you an anti-Semite?

TRAFICANT: No, I’m not. And that’s exactly what they’re going to say. And I expect that. What I am is an American. You see, I think America comes first. And we have a one-sided foreign policy in the Mideast, and we’ve alienated Arabs who have no way of fighting. So, what they’ve done — and I predicted this on the House floor — is they would export violence to America. And they have. They have no other way to fight. I think President Obama knows this. I think he sees this. I think he wants to do something. I think his hands are tied, and I think he’s dancing between the raindrops, trying to figure how I can politically machinate some scenario to mitigate these problems.

Greta, I’m saying this. America is in danger if America doesn’t take back their government without foreign influence, interference.

Further resources:

Michael Collins Piper: Frail Old Man Faces Bloodlust of Israeli Lobby

M. C. Piper’s Target Traficant

Archived article about Demjanjuk case: The Ukrainian Weekly, February 7, 1993

The Ivan Demjanjuk – James Traficant Connection
–Admin

The well known scene showing the prominent Star of David twice in Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan. The scene appears twice, once in the beginning of the film and once near the end and  powerfully suggests a larger Jewish role in the Normandy invasion than shown by historical fact.

The Culture of Deceit, Part II

Edmund Connelly

Two weeks ago, I showed that deceiving non-Jews was normative behavior for the Jewish community historically. As I wrote, “illegal activities involving deception and deceit are tolerated within the Jewish community. . . . The only ethical principle involved here is the age old ‘Is it good for the Jews?’”

I focused on financial crimes because they have been in the news for so long now and have involved Jews to a degree that most astute people can’t miss. Of course no human group is entirely free of deception or financial misdeeds but, as I argued, there seems to be a greater likelihood of financial crime among Jews (again, see here for an academic treatment that tiptoes around the issue). More importantly, I continued, Jewish white collar criminals do not face censure within their own communities.” For instance Moshe Rosenberg, an Orthodox rabbi, lamented that “Unfortunately, unethical and even illegal behavior too often does not face serious censure in our communities.”

From financial fraud and manipulation, I moved on to literary deceit, pointing to specific instances of Jewish deception by some of the most esteemed authors of our time. I did this because I hoped to show that it is not merely the desire for money that motivates Jewish deception. Rather, as I seek to illustrate, deceit is a normative aspect of Jewish culture. That is, it is not censured as it commonly is among, say, Christians. Instead, it is sanctioned as long as it is directed toward outgroups.

Today I would like to focus on another area in which American Jews have attempted to hoodwink their fellow Americans into believing that Jews have made more sacrifices than in fact they have — military bravery and sacrifice.

Valor on the battlefield and recognition of that valor are central to many cultures, including most Western cultures. As our last “Good War,” World War II occupies an important place not only in American history but in American mythology as well. In that war, the story goes, we reluctantly set out to smite forces of pure evil that threatened the entire world, from the Pacific theater to Europe.

Perhaps more remarkable is the fact that the question of Jewish valor in that war still makes the headlines. For instance, during the Clinton Administration, Larry Lawrence, U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland, died and was buried in Arlington National Cemetery.

One of America’s richest men, Lawrence owned the Hotel Del Coronado in San Diego, where his friend President Bill Clinton vacationed. Lawrence’s claim to the right to be buried in Arlington hinged on his assertion that he had had served in the Merchant Marine during WWII and had been injured. In fact, he had avoided the draft and never served.

The U.S. Army is in charge of Arlington Cemetery, so Army personnel carefully checked Lawrence’s story but found nothing to support it. Richard Holbrooke, who also happens to be Jewish, was Assistant Secretary of State at the time and appealed to the White House on Lawrence’s behalf. His request was granted, and Clinton presided over the 1996 burial.

As the New York Times reported, however, “Confronted with mounting evidence that M. Larry Lawrence, the late Ambassador to Switzerland, had fabricated a heroic World War II record, his widow decided today to have his remains exhumed from Arlington National Cemetery, where he was granted burial under an unusual waiver.”

Another Jewish WWII soldier, Sgt. David Rubitsky, claims to have accomplished superhuman feats. He was serving in New Guinea in 1942 when the Japanese attacked. As Joseph Farah reported in 2001:

Rubitsky watched the Japanese soldiers move small artillery pieces, heavy machine guns, mortars and anti-aircraft armaments into the area. He watched as more and more soldiers gathered. Anticipating a surprise attack by the Japanese on his 2nd Battalion, Rubitsky decided to lead his own surprise attack.

He opened fire. As Japanese soldiers advanced toward his bunker, Rubitsky used every weapon in his arsenal for nine grueling hours of intense fighting. He alternated between firing his .30-caliber water-cooled machine gun with 3,000 rounds of ammunition, a Browning automatic rifle with close to 600 rounds, his M-1 rifle, a pistol and tossing some of his 35 hand grenades.

Rubitsky spent a total of 21 hours in the bunker — including nine under heavy siege. The Japanese army attacked from three different directions – the north, south and west. . . . When Lt. Col. Herbert Smith came up to the bunker the next day, he estimated that Rubitsky had single-handedly killed 500 to 600 Japanese soldiers, thereby saving his own battalion from being decimated in a surprise attack.

Rubitsky made strenuous efforts to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor but insists it was denied because of anti-Semitism. The Anti-Defamation League initially aided Rubitsky’s campaign, as did the media generally. For example, as one researcher noted, “Newspaper and magazine articles, with references to ‘anti-Semitism’ [related to the Rubitsky campaign], appeared in such prestige publications as TIME and the New York Times.”

This researcher then added that “Because of the lobbying efforts of the ADL, including a resolution signed by 92 members of Congress, in 1987 the U.S. Army undertook a two-year review of David Rubitsky’s story. On December 8, 1989, after obtaining evidence from forensic specialists and taking statements from Rubitsky and 20 others who served alongside him, the U.S. Army concluded that Rubitsky’s claim was unfounded.”

To date, it is not known if Hollywood plans a bio-pic of Sgt. David Rubitsky.

As you can see, there are varying levels of spin used in these accounts. Of note is the support given by the (heavily Jewish) media and by Jewish activist organizations to validate these accounts. They create a narrative where Jews have allegedly performed valiantly, yet anti-Semitism, blatant or otherwise, has once again dogged these deserving Jews.

Steven Spielberg has contributed to this perception. In his film Saving Private Ryan, for instance, from the very beginning he visually insinuates that Jewish G.I.s made sacrifices comparable to that of their non-Jewish fellow soldiers. As the now-aged Mr. Ryan walks into the American cemetery in Normandy, his all-White family trailing him, director Spielberg fills the screen with a white cross, followed immediately by a grave with a Star of David (see the 1:50 mark on this YouTube outtake). That is a rather transparent bias when we next observe Ryan walking among a sea of Crosses over the graves of dead non-Jews. Spielberg repeats the scene at the film’s close (0:25 and 1:37 from this clip).

This brings to mind the story of former Congressman and now White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Unlike, say, Larry Lawrence, who did not serve during WWII, Emanuel did serve his country during the first Gulf War — as an Israeli soldier in Israel. In his book Rulers and Ruled in the US Empire: Bankers, Zionists and Militants, scholar James Petras notes that “less than 2/10 of one percent (0.2 percent) of the US soldiers in Iraq were Jewish and probably very few of those were on the front lines. More young American Jews volunteer to serve in the Israeli Defense Forces.” Of course this recalls Pat Buchanan’s 1990 claim that should America prosecute the first war on Iraq in favor of Israeli interests, the fighting would be done by kids “with names like McAllister, Murphy, Gonzales, and Leroy Brown.”

In any case, let me return to my central argument that deception is central to Jewish behavior — and it is not something they are ashamed of. As evidence of this, look at one of the founding myths Jews have of themselves, the biblical story of Jacob and Esau:

And the Lord said unto Rebecca, “Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.”  And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled…the first came out all red, all over like a hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.  And after that came his brother out, and his hand took ahold of Esau’s heel; and his name was called Jacob. (Gen. 25:23-26)

Historian Albert Lindemann unpacks the meaning of this story in Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews:

Indeed, the division between Jew and Gentile goes to the very origins and structures of western civilization. It predates the advent of Christianity and may be found in the earliest texts of the Old Testament . . . In those texts of the Hebrew Bible the mythical origins of the division between Jews and others are described, and a thought-provoking explanation for the antagonism of the two groups is offered. The account in Genesis of Esau and Jacob, twin brothers born to Rebecca and Isaac, has evoked a seemingly endless cycle of interpretations. Already in the earliest Jewish commentaries on the text in Genesis one encounters not only the rich layers of meaning but also the elusiveness, the profound ambiguity in the relationship between Jew (in archetype, Jacob) and Gentile (in archetype, Esau).

What is the archetype of the Jew in the Jews’ own founding myth? It is that of the liar or trickster. Recall what happened in Genesis 27:5-45. Nearing death, the elderly Isaac sent Esau out to trap game in order to prepare a meal appropriate to the blessing Isaac was to bestow upon his first son. With Rebecca’s participation, Jacob deceived his father into believing that he was in fact Esau. Numerous times Isaac suspected a ruse, finally asking, “Are you really my son Esau?” “I am,” Jacob lied. Jacob was ultimately successful in deceiving his father and received his blessing.

This passage is a stark instance in which we see one origin for the still-common Jewish belief that others (goyim) are to serve them. “Let peoples serve you, and nations bow down to you. Be lord over your brothers.”

Also of note is Isaac’s ambivalent blessing to his deceived son Esau: “Behold, away from the fatness of the earth shall your dwelling be, and away from the dew of heaven on high. By your sword you shall live, but your brother you shall serve.” About the only hopeful note comes when Isaac concludes: “But when you break loose you shall break his [Jacob’s] yoke from your neck.”

If one prefers to put a positive spin on the value of deceit, turn to Yuri Slezkine’s exposition of the Mercurian archetype in his book The Jewish Century. He explains that the Mercurians, including Jews, “possess a quality that the Greeks called metis, or ‘cunning intelligence.’” Thus Jews, as descendants of “tricksters,” are proud to possess such a trait, one that non-Jews (“Apollonians” in Slezkine’s dualism) deplore. Host cultures see Jews and other Mercurians as “devious, acquisitive, greedy, crafty, pushy, and crude.” Sounds familiar.

The bottom line is that non-Jews need to be realistic about this Jewish trait and not entertain notions that Jews can be shamed out of such belief and behavior. For example, the biblical story of Esther, which I related last week, captures Jewish pride in defeating their non-Jewish enemies by using deception. As with other Jewish biblical stories, Esther begins with deception and ends with the Israelites slaughtering their enemies and achieving high status and power.

Again, these messages appear repeatedly in the Old Testament. In the Book of Genesis, for example, God promises his Chosen People: “May God give you of the dew of heaven, and of the fatness of the earth, and plenty of grain and wine. Let peoples serve you, and nations bow down to you.” Later, in Deuteronomy 6:10–11, God promises to give great and goodly cities “which you did not build, and houses full of all good things, which you did not fill, and cisterns hewn out, which you did not hew, and vineyards and olive trees, which you did not plant.“

In Joshua 24:12–13, God tells the Jews: “I gave you a land on which you had not labored, and cities which you had not built, and you dwell therein; you eat the fruit of vineyards and oliveyards which you did not plant.”

How do you think they accomplished this? People do not simply hand over their cities to invaders. If in fact God did intervene and perform a miracle, well, that’s one thing. Still, it suggests something we keep seeing throughout history — Jews becoming a dominant elite over native populations.

I hope readers will accept that part of this success indeed stems from Jewish use of deception, a practice that is not going to go away. In closing, I’ll turn to Canadian poet David Solway, who mockingly wrote recently, “We Jews are a sly and surreptitious people. It pains me to admit this, but candor compels.” But here, of course, Solway is using deception, for in fact he is simply telling the truth. Do not be fooled by the trickster’s resort to mockery to veil the truth.

From The Occidental Quarterly. Edmund Connelly (email him) is a freelance writer, academic, and expert on the cinema arts. He is a frequent contributor The Occidental Quarterly.

Roy Beck urges Members of Congress to assist 15 million unemployed Americans by supporting a suspension of all non-essential immigration.

Our TV Ads on CNN Hammer Key Point – U.S. Still Importing 1.5 Million Foreign Workers A Year

From Roy Beck — NumbersUSA

The powerful “elevator ad” is back up on CNN, reminding news watchers that Washington’s politicians have only minimal concern for jobless Americans. With 15 million unemployed, the ad notes that our immigration system is still bringing in 1.5 million foreign workers each year. Not one Member of Congress has proposed suspending this insane federal attack on the working families of this country.

These incredible facts should be the No. 1 topic at Town Hall meetings this month.

TALK ABOUT THE ELEVATOR AD AT TOWN HALL MEETINGS

Before you go to a meeting, look up your Congressman to look at his/her immigration grade.

• If the grade is bad, demand that your Representative or Senator explain why he/she has continually insisted on more foreign workers instead of preserving dwindling U.S. jobs for citizens of this country (and permanent legal immigrants who already are here).
• If the grade is good, demand to know why your Senator or Representative has not introduced legislation to suspend most immigration until the Jobs Depression is over.

Not even our best ally in Congress has introduced an Immigration Suspension Bill.

And even though most Republican Members of Congress have stood up against any increase in foreign workers, the Republican congressional leadership has done nothing to champion the cause of unemployed Americans by highlighting the insanity of our continuing program of astronomical immigration numbers.

The Democratic leadership is even worse — working daily to INCREASE the number of foreign workers.

THE INMATES INDEED ARE RUNNING THE INSANE ASYLUM

Wouldn’t you think that in a democratic republic the elected representatives in a time of horrible unemployment would stop importing foreign workers?

But an Immigration Suspension is not even whispered in the halls of Congress.

This Jobs Depression is in its second year and the beleaguered U.S. worker still doesn’t have a full champion in Congress.

Along with other immigration-reduction groups in the Coalition for the Future American Worker, NumbersUSA is using the Elevator Ad to draw attention to the U.S. Congress’s continuing hostility to American workers. For the majority in Congress — no matter what the issue — immigration and corporations that demand foreign workers are always the top priority.

No matter how much the American people suffer.

• Please post this ad everywhere you can.
• Please email this ad to everybody you know and ask them to spread this horrifying inconvenient truth that our federal government every day is importing immigrants to put yet more American workers out of a job.
• Underneath the ad on the YouTube page, please rate the ad and leave a comment to help spread the word. (Already, when you search for “elevator ad” on YouTube, this ad comes up first.)

And remind everybody that the immigrants and temporary foreign workers are not the culprits. They are simply taking advantage of a system that is rigged against the American worker.

The culprits are your Senators and Representatives.

Even the best of them are not making jobless Americans a priority by fighting for an Immigration Suspension.

Send free faxes from our website to demand an Immigration Suspension that gives a break to vulnerable Americans.

ROY BECK is Founder & CEO of NumbersUSA

 
Views and opinions expressed in blogs on this website are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect official policies of NumbersUSA.

 
Article Source: NumbersUSA

Mantiq al-Tayr

Back in 2005, poor Tad Rickman, writing for the Denver Daily News, made a typo for which he became infamous for a while. Here’s what he did.

“The Denver Daily News would like to offer a sincere apology for a typo in Wednesday’s Town Talk regarding New Jersey’s proposal to ban smoking in automobiles. It was not the author’s intention to call New Jersey ‘Jew Jersey.’”

I think now everyone owes Tad an apology.

The fact that evil lawbreakers such as the folks pictured at right were nabbed in New Jersey should come as no surprise. The state is really not much more than an Israeli fort filled with all kinds of Israeli spies and criminals.

First of all, let’s recall the 2004 case of former New Jersey governor, James McGreevey, who had a homosexual relationship with an Israeli named Golan Cipel. He even made Cipel the head of security for the state of New Jersey. Imagine that, putting a foreign national in charge of security of the state. Cipel must give good blow jobs or something. Anyway, McGreevey had to resign over the scandal. Cipel was no doubt a Mossad agent and had even served in the Israeli Consulate in New York.

But there’s much, much more.

First though, we have an announcement here at Mantiq al-Tayr. In doing some research for today’s post, the tuyuur here at Mantiq al-Tayr have discovered a great person – Laura Dawn Lewis – who is clearly a patriot and yes, like Katherine Albrecht, she is also a babe. Mish hayk?

Ms. Lewis, whose bio is here, made a great post on her website during the Cipel Israeli homosexual spy scandal in New Jersey that all of you should read. Here it is. She notes more than a few interesting things about this nest of Israeli spies that we call New Jersey.

First though, she points out how McGreevey met Cipel. It was on one of those junkets to Israel that almost ALL US Knesset members take – often they go more than once. Back in 2000 that’s how McGreevey met Cipel. Pretty cool, hugh. Has your governor, senator or congressman gotten a blow job from an Israeli? Please write to them and ask.

Anyway, among the food for though she provides is:

- The dancing Israelis arrested on 911 were based in New Jersey.

- the anthrax letters in the wake of 911 were mailed from New Jersey

- Two Israelis were caught in Tennessee in 2002 with classified submarine fuel were based in New Jersey.

- She notes that Israel’s two biggest ways to get money (when not stealing from the US Treasury) is through arms smuggling and drug dealing. New Jersey is a major state Defense Department wise – really an ideal place to get a hold of toys and sell them to others. A great place for Cipel to be in charge of security.

And much, much more. One of the best exposes of Israel we’ve seen on the web.

Anyway, back to the latest case of Israeli infiltration of New Jersey. Oh wait, remember Edward Mosberg? He’s the “holocaust survivor” from, well, New Jersey, who was allowed to travel to Israel to see the Pope when Benedick went there earlier this year in a obvious and quite successful attempt to humiliate Catholics all over the globe. The mere fact that Mosberg was under indictment for fraud was no obstacle to his being allowed to hold hands with the Pope and to stay in Israel for days afterward. Did he ever return to the United States?

Anyway, back to the most recent scandle. By the way, so far unidicted New Jersey governor Jon Corzine, has chosen a Jewish woman as his running mate. She is state Senator (and so far unindicted) Loretta Weinberg and she is not, as far as we know, a holocaust survivor. However, she claims her life savings were wiped out by Bernie Madoff. Clearly, if you need to get back lots of cash, the best way is to become as deeply involved in New Jersey poltics as possible, and we here at Mantiq al-Tayr are quite certain that Ms. Weinberg will be able to recover her losses.

Anyway, back once again to the sordid collection of perverted misfits arrested Thursday in New Jersey.

Wait, I almost forgot. Remember Ben-Ami Kadish? He spied on the US for Israel for years and was recently arrested in, you’ll never believe it, New Jersey. Oh, and when he did his spying, guess where he was working. Surprise surprise, he was in a military base in New Jersey. We here at Mantiq al-Tayr thank Shadai that Kadish basically was told that spying for Israel is okay.

So, you want to read about the latest and greatest scandal. Go here, the Newark Star-Ledger is all over it. Here’s a list of those arrested. Go to the “money laundering” part of the list and look at what these guys are charged with. Note that lots of it has to do with so-called “charitable” organizations. It used to be, and probably still is the case, that if you wanted to get to know the FBI really really really well, all you had to do was open up an Islamic charity. You’d also get lots of attention from the various and sundry traitorous pundits who make up the proganda campaign for the Israeli lobby. We’ve always felt here at Mantiq al-Tayr that Islamic charities were getting so viciously attacked by the Lobby and Feds because the Lobby specializes in attacking others for doing exactly what the Lobby does everyday. I guess they just can’t conceive that someone could set up a charitable organization that isn’t a scam.

And as for the scumbag of a scumbags, that creepy Rosenbaum – just whose organs is he selling? And what’s all this about him pulling guns on people. It turns out that authorities have known what he has been doing for years. Could you imagine if he’d been a Arab and was getting Jewish donors at gun-point?

Let’s see how the press handles this. Here’s a prediction.

By the end of the weekend no one in the mainstream press will be covering it.

The Rabbis will get mostly get off scot free. Maher Khalil, the one Arabic guy caught up in this will go to jail and the many non-Jewish politicians caught up in this will for the most part be punished, but only one or two will become the major scapegoats.

The people of New Jersey should demand that all of their politicians step down, that all Jewish charities be shut down in their state and that ALL of the guilty parties are brought to justice.

 
Article Source: Mantiq al-Tayr
[Article slightly edited to better fit our formating]

Staff

‘This week’s protest, leading up to Thursday’s hearing, must be massive, call your Senators toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121!’

From Rev. Ted Pike

This Thursday at 10 a.m. EDT the battle to save America from becoming a hate crimes police state will be joined in the hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every American who is able should view the live webcast of the hearing at www.judiciary.senate.gov.

But even as the hate bill battle rages, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith moves forward two more monster hate bills. While it is important that lovers of freedom not allow themselves to become distracted from present opposition to S. 909 in the Senate, we cannot remain ignorant of these new attempts by the ADL to batter down the walls of freedom.

The first is ADL’s “anti-bullying” bill, the “Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act,” HR 1966, introduced to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime on May 26. This bill is as simple and direct as the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, S. 909, is complicated and obscure. HR 1966 makes it a federal thought crime to intend to “intimidate” or “harass” anyone over the internet or airwaves. Such “cyberbullying” is punishable by harsh fines and up to two years in prison. It does not define what the terms “intimidate” or “harass” mean. Promoted as legislation to protect America’s youth, its real intention is to remove free speech from the internet altogether.

Here is the essential text:

Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce [radio, TV, internet] any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both. (HR 1966, SEC 3, Sec. 881a)

This means that if any pastor, talk show host or guest, or anyone communicating on radio or the internet is repeatedly “hostile” to the practice of homosexuality and “intends” to cause “substantial emotional distress” in homosexuals, leading to repentance, he is guilty. The speaker doesn’t even have to succeed in causing such conviction for sin, even though he will be especially guilty if he does. In either case, the federal government is empowered under this bill to invade any state to prosecute the “bully” of the airwaves.

In legal theory, HR 1966 is a mirror image of ADL’s Canadian federal hate law, Section 319, and its internet hate law, Section 13.1. These statutes state that if any speaker makes statements, even “likely” to cause a member of a federally favored group to feel lessened or intimidated, the speaker is guilty. Yet if he succeeds, the “victim’s” claim of emotional distress is more than enough to convict the critic. Truth is not admitted in hate crimes tribunal courts. Only the feelings of the criticized matter.

House Judiciary Republicans must be warned against HR 1966. They must immediately prepare to oppose it vigorously in the House Judiciary Committee. Otherwise, it could move rapidly to a vote in the House.

Call Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee (names listed on the Action Page at www.truthtellers.org). Call toll-free 1-877-851-6437 or toll 1-202-225-3121. Tell them: “Please oppose the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act, HR 1966. It’s another ADL hate crimes bill which outlaws free speech through broadcasting and the internet. Please demand hearings on this very dangerous legislation.”

The second impending bill is ENDA, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. According to the Washington Blade (June 17, 2009, “Representative Frank Close to Introducing ENDA”), ENDA will soon be introduced in the House Judiciary. “An aide to U.S. Representative Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said Wednesday that the congressman plans to introduce a revised version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act next week that will include protections for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people.”

ENDA is ADL’s workplace/real estate “anti-hate” law which forces businessmen and even church leaders to hire homosexuals — and not fire them for “bias” reasons — on penalty of huge fines and possible imprisonment. It also forces property owners to sell or rent to homosexuals, suffering similar penalties if they “discriminate.”

Although ENDA is very threatening, House Republicans are familiar with it, having battled ENDA in the previous Congress. I believe they can be counted upon to take action.

Once you have called the House Judiciary Republicans concerning the threat of cyberbullying bill HR 1966, you should re-focus your attention on repeated calling of all 100 members of the Senate in protest of the federal hate bill, S. 909. Tell them not to vote for the “pedophile-protecting” hate bill, promising that if they do you and your friends will never forgive or forget.

Senate Majority Leader Reid says he wants a vote on the hate bill before summer recess. If we can kill the hate bill, S. 909, before Congress departs, it will send a powerfully demoralizing message to ADL, Reid, and the homosexual lobby to back off ENDA, the cyberbullying bill, and other freedom-stealing legislation ADL has in the works.

This week’s protest, leading up to Thursday’s hearing, must be massive — letting all pro-hate bill Senators know as never before that a vote for the pedophile-protecting hate bill means our undying opposition. Even if we live thousands of miles from their districts, we will make sure, through use of internet, talk radio, etc., that they never return to Congress.

Let the Anti-Defamation League teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians, and spearhead attempts to pass the federal hate crimes bill: http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/intro.asp.

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

 
Read more Ted Pike at TruthTellers.org

“223 co-sponsors, and the numbers keep growing!”

From RonPaul.com

Congressman Ron Paul’s Federal Reserve Transparency Act, HR 1207, has reached and surpassed the level of 218 cosponsors in the House of Representatives, which means it is now cosponsored by a majority of the members.

The 218th cosponsor was Dennis Kucinich (OH-10), and the bill has since received its 223nd cosponsor.

“The tremendous grass-roots and bipartisan support in Congress for HR 1207 is an indicator of how mainstream America is fed up with Fed secrecy,” said Congressman Paul. “I look forward to this issue receiving greater public exposure.”

Hearings on Federal Reserve transparency are expected within the next month, as part of the Financial Services Committee’s series of hearings on regulatory reform.(…Full Article)

 
Alex Jones Interviews Ron Paul on HR 1207