An Independence Day Message from David Duke

I wish all my fellow Americans a truly meaningful Independence Day.

It is also an important day for all nations and all peoples in that the Declaration of Independence made by our American forefathers was the first written attempt to define the natural longings and rights of a people for Independence and true freedom.

The fundamental idea is that each and every people has the right to a government that represents their interests, their heritage and their values. It is the idea that government must be devoted first to the welfare of its own people, not other nations or any entity. Today that concept would reject control of America by Israel or by multi-national corporations that have no loyalty to the people of the United States.

Today of course, America has lost its Independence. Our political structure is dominated by a few extremists among a mere 2 percent of the population. The most powerful lobby in the Congress of the United States is the Jewish Lobby and it is composed of AIPAC and a myriad of Jewish political campaign funding organizations. Imagine that the most powerful lobby in the American Government is devoted to the exclusive interests of the foreign state of Israel and the perceived interests of a people comprising just 2 percent of the American people rather than the other 98 percent.

AIPAC is but one visible sign of this power. It can be seen in many other expressions. An example is the fact that the largest corporate campaign donations among both candidates in the last election for president were dominated by Jewish-controlled international banks and financial entities. A perfect example is Obama’s largest corporate contributor: the criminal Goldman Sachs. On DavidDuke.com I also show articles from Jewish publications such as the JTA (Jewish Telegraph Agency) and Haaretz showing that the three largest political contributors in America are Jews with a deep allegiance to Israel. And I show how even the Washington Post tells us that over 50 percent of the large campaign contributors to both the Democratic and Republican party are Jewish.

We see this alien power in the most powerful financial institution in the world today: the Federal Reserve. Ben Shalom Bernanke and Alan Greenspan represent decades of this control. Note how this is the one appointment by the President that seems to go on and regardless of the party in power. As Baron Rothschild said, “Give me the power to coin a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws.” If control of our money is not independent and not dedicated to the great majority of the American people rather than International Financial Corporations, then our nation surely can’t be dedicated to the interests of our people.

Our lack of Independence and freedom can also be shown in the fact that the media in America are thoroughly controlled by this same alien entity designed to keep us ignorant of our lack of independence and the fact that we have been politically and socially conquered. Of course we have not been conquered by armies, but by stealth and subversion.

In Hollywoodism: Jews, Movies and the American Dream, Jewish film producers Elliot Halpern & Simcha Jacobvici Productions made a documentary that tells how Jews overcame the Gentile filmmakers such as Thomas Edison and D.W. Griffith, and gradually replaced their traditional American themes. They interview Jewish author Neil Gabler, who frankly tells how these non-Americans replaced the “real” America.

“They created their own America, an America which is not the real America…But ultimately this shadow America becomes so popular and so widely disseminated that its images and its values come to devour the real America. And so the grand irony of all of Hollywood — is that Americans come to define themselves by the shadow of America that was created by the Eastern European Jewish immigrants who weren’t permitted in the precincts of the real America.”

On this Independence Day we must re-dedicate ourselves to the restoration of the real America, to our true Independence as a people, as a nation. Such is the right of all people on the Earth, and we deserve that right. But that right is not freely accorded. As our forefathers recognized, we must work, sacrifice and even sometimes fight for that right.

It is ironic that restoring our Independence for America has also become critical for the Independence of all people all over the world. For a Zionist-controlled America is now the biggest force for not only unending war, but also the globalism that wants to crush every expression of Independence and freedom in the name of globalism. The Hollywood takeover has had a horrific effect not only on our own values, it has led countless tens of millions of people around the world to degeneracy, drugs, and dissolution of the family. It has glorified violence, brutality, coarseness, incivility and immorality. It has promoted a globalist economy and mindset of endless greed as exampled in the BP disaster in the Gulf, the same emerald water that I swam in as a child, waters that were once pure and unsullied. In the name of mammon our air and water has been fouled, and this globalist system based on greed has corrupted Nature rather than allowed us to live in harmony with it.

As it has corrupted Nature, it has corrupted even our own bodies, as obesity, ill health and disease are world wide epidemics nurtured by the sickness of this New World Order. It even seeks to undo hundreds of thousands of years of evolution that has given mankind its diversity and unique expressions. We Europeans recognize the existential threat to our people.

America is the most powerful nation on Earth. We must become once more Independent and a force for freedom rather than for a soulless New World Order of destruction of both humanity’s health and diversity, and the very health of the Earth itself.

So today I speak for the American people with a voice that says: rise up and restore your Independence.

Re-dedicate yourself from this day forward to Independence and freedom for the American people, an Independence, not only vital for ourselves and our children, but for every people on the Earth and even for our Mother Earth itself.

Dr. David Duke

Helen Thomas Tells the Zionist Jews — Get out of Palestine!

The now quite elderly Helen Thomas is America’s foremost female journalist. She has covered White House press conferences since John F. Kennedy. In an interview last week she stated: “The Jews should get out of Palestine. They should go back to where they came from – Poland, Germany, the U.S.” Her forthright statement unleashed a torrent of hateful attacks from Jewish spokesmen.  They demanded that Hearst Publications fire her and that she be denied her reserved seat at White House press conferences. Under pressure, Thomas apologized and resigned her position. However, no Jewish leader issued a single word of acceptance of her apology. In fact, we do not recall the extremist Jews who control the Jewish community ever accepting an apology from anyone. They stick to their ancient slogan, “Never Forgive – Never Forget!”

Historians recount that in 1917 British leaders, Lloyd George, Winston Churchill and Sir James Balfour hit upon a scheme to defeat Germany in World War One. They would pledge Palestine as a Jewish homeland to World Zionist leader, Chaim Weizmann, if the Zionists surrounding the weak President Woodrow Wilson would persuade him to enter the war on Britain’s side. Thus, a war that was at a stalemate, with peace negotiations under consideration, jumped into high gear instead of coming to a sensible and humane peace. In 14 months of more senseless fighting another one million men were slaughtered, including 325,018 Americans. The war aims accomplished, the Balfour Declaration, promising the Jews Palestine, was issued to Baron James Rothschild, the richest and most powerful Jew in the world, on Nov. 2, 1917.

The British had no right whatsoever to make such a promise. Palestine was then part of the Turkish Empire and had never belonged to England. At the time there were only 57,000 Jews living there, compared to 700,000 Arabs. Helen Thomas is to be congratulated for bringing the root cause of the tragedy of the Palestinian people to the forefront! Israel was created by a massive ethnic war crime against the Palestinian people, and has for 60 years been the cause of hundreds of thousands of men, women and children dispossessed, tortured or murdered, not only in Palestine but in the surrounding nations as well.

The Grand Ole Dame of Journalism sure did go out with a bang and not a whimper!

By Mark Anderson — AFP

The First Amendment Festival sponsored November 7 by AMERICAN FREE PRESS featured stirring speeches by two noted authors and lecturers, Dr. David Duke and Texe Marrs. Several AFP staffers, including this one, shared brief remarks as well. Duke spoke forcefully about his ongoing effort to spread the word about his main focal point—Jewish supremacism.

As he explains in his books, this hegemonic movement permeates most levels of society and has fostered tragic wars, as well as steep economic and cultural decline through control of central banking, key government posts, media, television and the movie industry.

Speaking to an audience of about 100 people at a Washington hotel, Duke said that a big issue to consider is American troops being killed, maimed and traumatized fighting Israel’s enemies in the Mideast. About 300,000 U.S. troops who served in Afghanistan and Iraq are suffering from mental illness and 320,000 have traumatic brain damage, he said.

“Officially we have 32,000 wounded … we’ve literally caused the breakup of millions of American families… [and]America is hated around the world,” Duke reflected, while mentioning the Fort Hood Army Base shooting that had just occurred. “What happened in Texas would not have happened, if America was not in a state of perpetual war,” he said.

Meanwhile, President Obama is debating whether to send 20,000 or 40,000 more troops to Afghanistan, Duke added, showing that Obama’s anti-war statements prior to being elected president were just throw-away remarks for public consumption.

“These wars are not serving the interests of the American people,” said Duke, stressing that due to the entrenched power of the lobbying group known as the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, American troops will remain embroiled in the far-away Middle East on Israel’s behalf while the U.S. border with Mexico remains virtually wide open to illegal immigration and the cultural, demographic and economic shifts that it causes, such as drastically watering down and displacing America’s white European culture—a culture that Duke believes deserves equal respect with all other peoples on Earth, especially since it is that portion of humanity that founded America.

Noting that his limited activities as a young man with the Ku Klux Klan were 30 years ago and that he long ago chose a different path, Duke also remarked that the pro-Zionist media’s persistent efforts to cast him as a racist are completely off base.

Calling Obama’s receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize “the greatest joke of the century and the last century,” Duke characterized Obama as a “Judas Goat”—an appealing personage who leads the innocent to slaughter. Obama appears perfect for that role, since he does not look like a “good-old-boy white establishment type.” Therefore he can get away with Zionist policy-pushing, as Duke sees it. Moreover, Obama often gets European support for pro-Zionism due to his apparent popularity in the U.S.

Indeed, Obama, in Duke’s estimation, is the “Tel Aviv candidate” groomed for his current job within the Chicago political machine over the course of many years. Much later, Goldman-Sachs, a financial power that Duke noted is under Zionist control, “gave the largest amount of corporate contributions to him.”

Sweeping through several related matters, Duke said that the essence of Jewish supremacism is the Talmud, a major Jewish holy book. Noted Zionists believe that all life on the Earth literally was created “to serve the Jews.” He asked the audience to imagine what would happen if he were to say that life was created “to serve white people.”

Duke also pointed to the sheer hypocrisy of a Louisiana judge in a small parish being lambasted for not wanting to perform an inter-racial marriage, but the media are silent regarding the Jewish system’s discriminatory practices.

“A marriage between a Jew and non-Jew is not legal— it doesn’t happen,” Duke said, “but we’re sending our money to a nation that has that kind of policy.” He added: “The racial policies of Israel are more extreme than the policies of National Socialist Germany.”

Duke added that Jewish influence in Hollywood is appallingly shown in “torture porn” movies like Hostel and in brutality-laced flicks like Inglorius Basterds starring Brad Pitt. These and similar movies teach the young it’s OK to brutalize someone they dislike. Moreover, the pornography industry, according to Duke, has considerable Jewish influence while demeaning women and undermining normal relationships between men and
women. As an author, Duke has written that certain Jews support such seedy enterprises in their twisted zeal to undermine Christian culture.

Yet, Duke still believes that the Jewish people and Israel deserve a basic right to self-determination—but certainly not this ill-gotten supremacy that fosters so many evils—just as blacks, Chinese, and, yes, European Americans should all have a chance to preserve their respective cultures.

Furthermore, the 61-year occupation of the Palestinians’ land by the state of Israel, and the outdoor prison that it has become for herding, torturing and killing Palestinians, is horrifying and must end. Duke documented in his book My Awakening that President Jimmy Carter, today a critic of Israeli policies, tried to reason during peace talks with [the late] Israeli leader Menachem Begin but found that this former commando, who was directly involved in brutal killings of Palestinians when their land was seized to form Israel in 1948, still saw them as subhumans not worthy of consideration.

Also in My Awakening, Duke wrote that a majority of the leading comrades who launched 20th century Communism were Jewish, including Leon Trotsky (a.k.a. Lev Bronstein).

Marrs complemented Duke’s speech with a number of observations, including a major point that the popular ministries of leading “Christian” evangelicals actually are run by Jewish interests. This, according to Marrs, explains the pro-Zionist, Israel-can-do-no-wrong bias of major TV preachers like the multi-millionaire Pat Robertson.

This behind-the-scenes “engine” runs the Christian establishment while hating Christ, but “the real church,” Marrs remarked, lives on in the hearts of “the little people.”

The Praise The Lord (PTL) ministry seemingly run by infamous preacher Jim Bakker “was not owned by Christians at all,” according to Marrs, who added that even Pastor Oral Roberts was bailed out by a Jewish insider connected to a race track who put up $100 million, yet such “bailouts” do not exist for genuine Christians.

Marrs added that “700 Club” founder Robertson, after flunking out of law school, floundered a bit but suddenly got seven broadcast stations donated to him. To put it mildly, Marrs does not believe the stations were an answer to a prayer.

After outlining other Jewish connections with high-profile evangelists, Marrs noted that putting money behind the preferred president is also important. For instance, according to “Jewish power broker” Abner Mikva, as related by Marrs, “Barack Obama will go down in history as the first Jewish president of America.”

Mikva, a longtime federal judge, also reportedly said that Obama was Jewish-groomed in Chicago, which led to major Jewish financial backing from the owners of Hyatt hotels. Marrs added that billionaire George Soros, whose connections include the centuries-old Rothschild banking interests in Europe, put money into various U.S. movements such as ACORN, the community-based organization with which Obama was connected in Chicagoland, and which evidently got involved in crooked dealings.

Marrs—while stating that there are only some 18 million Jews in the world, with 7.5 million in Israel, about the same number in the U.S., and the rest elsewhere—marveled at the amount of influence and control such a small but powerful minority can exert, and how expertly their influence can fool people. Marrs illustrated this by noting that in A.D. 70, the Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed down to the last stone as Jesus predicted, and that what remained was deemed to be “desolate,” or spiritually empty, yet modern-day Christians want to rebuild a temple that has nothing to do with their faith.

The Temple Mount Foundation gets money from Christians. Marrs met a female backer of the project who remarked, “Isn’t it wonderful prophecy is being fulfilled,” but Marrs said that when he set the lady straight regarding the facts, she was totally taken aback at the prospect of being so thoroughly deceived.

Both Duke and Marrs referred to the Talmud, which includes sordid and shocking contents and is difficult for non-Jews to even find, much less read, but its pages explain the basis for the apparent Jewish-supremacist mindset that both authors have labored to explain and expose.

Mark Anderson is a longtime newsman now working as deputy editor for American Free Press. Together he and his wife Angie provide many photographs of the events they cover for AFP. Mark welcomes your comments as well as story leads. Email him at at truthhound2@yahoo.com.

 
Subscribe to American Free Press. Online subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK – HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR – By Michael Piper.

Print subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six free issues of Whole Body Health: $59 Order on this website or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS.

Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute – as long as full credit is given to American Free Press – 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003

 
Article Source: American Free Press

Barack Obama: America’s First Jewish President?

By Victor Thorn–APF

ON DEC. 12, 2008,

Judge Abner Mikva, a Jewish former counsel in the Clinton White House, quipped, “Barack Obama will go down in history as America’s first Jewish president.” The Wall Street Journal ran an article on April 21 that included a quote from Judson Miner, a Jewish lawyer, who gave Obama his first job in Chicago.

“‘I used to tease Barack that he had Jewish blood,” said Miner. The connections to Judaism run even closer to home: Michelle Obama’s second cousin converted to Judaism, was ordained a rabbi, and runs a Chicago congregation made up largely of black converts to Judaism.

Similarly, on April 16, 2008, the Los Angeles Times ran a headline, “Barack Obama Claims Jewish Kinship” after he told an audience, “My links to the Jewish community are not political. They preceded my entry into politics.”

Obama’s closest confidante, Valerie Jarrett, is the protege of Marilyn Katz, a Jewish security provider for the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). According to scholar Arthur Liebman, 46 percent of all SDS delegates in the 1960s were Jewish, with five of nine presidents being Jewish.

Katz introduced Jarrett to Daniel Levin (Jewish) who gave her a real estate job, whereupon she worked with Obama’s bagman, convicted felon Tony Rezko. Katz also founded the New American Movement (which included the Communist Party USA) with Rabbi Michael Lerner.

In regard to the president, one of Katz’s clients, Project Vote (an ACORN affiliate), brought Obama to Chicago. She also introduced Obama at his first nationwide anti-war speech on Oct. 2, 2002; then served on his finance committee and as a bundler during the 2008 presidential race.

Further, Katz has known Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers (a disciple of the SDS) for over 40 years. Ayers is married to fellow Weather Underground member Bernadine Dohrn (Jewish), and served with Obama on the Woods Fund (which provided a major expansion in funding to ACORN). Ayers also arranged for Walter and Leonore Annenberg (Jewish) to name Obama to be the first chairman of the prestigious Annenberg Foundation in 1995.

Similarly, Valerie Jarrett’s mother ran the Erickson Institute, where one of the board members was Tom Ayers, father of Bill Ayers. Bernadine Dohrn also served on this board.

Fellow Weather Underground founder Jeff Jones is married to Eleanor Stein (Jewish), and was credited by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for writing most of the recent “stimulus bill” via the Apollo Alliance. Jones also served with Van Jones, a self-avowed Communist, in this same organization.

Then, none other than Valerie Jarrett brought Van Jones into the Obama cabinet. She boasted at the Daily Kos conference on Aug. 15, “We have been watching Van Jones for some years and are so delighted to recruit him into the White House.”

In addition, Jarrett hired Michelle Robinson (Obama—the couple married in 1992) in 1991 to work in Mayor Richard Daley’s office; then opened doors for the couple to enter Chicago’s most liberal social circles.

Another influential member of Obama’s Cabinet with close ties to Jarrett is senior adviser David Axelrod (Jewish). Jarrett first hired him at the Urban Health Institute, and then longtime Democratic insider Betty Lu Saltzman (Jewish) introducedAxelrod to Obama in 1992. Axelrod’s two mentors were journalist/activists Don Rose and David S. Canter, both Jewish. Rose held membership in a Communist Party organization labeled the Alliance to End Repression, while their president and directors were Richard Criley, Abe Feinglass, Jack Spiegel and Norman Roth, all Jewish. Rose also knew Marilyn Katz quite well through the SDS, and the newspaper he owned pushed Marxist causes while also promoting Abner Mikva, one of Obama’s early Jewish mentors. Not to be outdone, his partner’s father, Harry J. Canter, acted as secretary of Boston’s Communist Party.

The extent of this collaboration between various questionable factions in Chicago is reflected in the comments of Rabbi Arnold Wolf (who died in 2008), a Democratic Socialist. “We had a party for [Obama] at our house when he was just starting back in the 1990s. I said right away: ‘[H]ere’s a guy who could sell our product, and sell it with splendor.’”

From the research done on Barack Obama during the past few years, it’s clear that his rise to power can be unequivocally mapped as follows. At the top exist extremely wealthy Jewish financiers such as the Rothschilds and George Soros, who’ve set his course in motion. To carry out this plan are mid-level Jewish operatives (Rahm Emanuel, Axelrod, Summers, Katz etc), along with hard-line Marxist sympathizers.

Lastly, at the street level are a host of black nationalists such as Van Jones and Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whose rhetoric is aggressively anti-white. Toss in a very pro-Obama unabashedly Jewish-controlled media, and it’s ultimately clear how he reached the Oval Office.

Source:  American Free Press

–Admin

Back Down Obama From Signing Hate Bill! New Strategy, New Video and Flyer!

‘In order to save free speech, we must make sure every town hall meeting and tea party also include generous hate bill protests’

By Rev. Ted Pike — MP3

In 1917, international Jewish supremacist organization B’nai B’rith masterminded the Bolshevik revolution. The czar was overthrown and Russia was submerged in Communist totalitarianism. The Bolsheviks were financed by B’nai B’rith insider Jacob Schiff, head of Kuhn and Loeb Bank (now Chase Manhattan), along with affiliated Jewish banking houses, the European Rothschilds and Warburgs. (See, Jewish Activists Created Communism) Today in Congress the same B’nai B’rith which overthrew Christian Russia is working tirelessly—through its “civil liberties” arm, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith—to control the American government at all levels and bring tyranny to America.

How was Russia overthrown? During the latter part of World War I, Russia was losing its conflict against Germany. Public confidence in the Russian government had never been lower. Jewish revolutionaries such as Trotsky, Khamenev, Zinoviev and others orchestrated a propaganda campaign in the army and navy, as well as the peasant population, to call for violent overthrow of the Romanov dynasty.

Today in America, the revolution doesn’t require bullets and barricades. Instead it erects perverse, imperious laws which destroy the Christian/Constitutional foundation of America. It employs powerful electoral and lobbying forces such as homosexuals, Jews, blacks, Latinos, radical feminists, etc., as well as liberal/Marxist Democrats under ADL control in the U.S. House and Senate. The objective is to establish a new internationalist regime in America. They are perilously close to succeeding.

Yet grassroots America is rising in rebellion. In town hall meetings, angry constituents tongue-lash Democrat members of Congress for their arrogance and unresponsiveness. Especially during the summer recess when members of Congress are home, voters shout to their elected representatives: “Enough! We won’t be ignored. We won’t allow those we send to Congress to defy our values and priorities.”

In response to this groundswell, NPN has produced a new 7.5-minute video, “Town Hall Outrage Can Kill the Hate Bill,” viewable at the top of www.truthtellers.org. It shows how we may yet back President Obama down from signing the federal hate crimes bill – the most powerful tool ADL/B’nai B’rith needs to end freedom in America.

Also, our new flyer is included at the end of this article; please reproduce and distribute it as widely as possible. Saturate town hall meetings, tax protests, your church parking lot, etc. with this flyer through the summer.

On July 11 the federal hate crimes bill was passed by Congress. Democrats disregarded overwhelming objections by the American people.

The hate bill violates three amendments to the Constitution:

• 14th Amendment. The hate bill grants special rights, services, and protections to federally protected groups such as homosexuals, Jews, Muslims, and Latinos.
• 10th Amendment. It will unite federal and local law enforcement into a single police state system.
• 1st Amendment. The hate bill will soon broaden into a speech crimes law for America, like Canada’s, ending free speech.

In the weeks before passage of this Orwellian legislation, calls protesting the hate bill sometimes reached 50 percent of total calls to Senate offices. They exceeded calls about the Sotomayor confirmation and healthcare reform. Yet Democrats ignored Americans. They overwhelmingly passed the hate bill in both House and Senate. The hate bill is now headed for signature by the President in September.

Can anything be done to stop the hate bill and save free speech?

Much can be done. Americans’ tremendous anger — which erupted in tea party protests and now in town hall meetings –must persuade Pres. Obama not to sign the hate bill. He must be made to realize that if he signs it into law we, the people, will make it a disaster for his political career and the future of the Democrat Party.

Yes, many vital issues concern grassroots America. But we are experiencing legislative anarchy that can only be compared to cardiac arrest. If you had a heart attack, doctors would concentrate on one thing: Keep your heart beating! America’s beating heart is our freedom of speech. A federal hate law will kill it. If our right to free speech dies, all other rights will perish.

Through the summer and early fall, everyone who has participated in a “tea party” tax protest, disagrees with Obama’s healthcare plan, or truly cares about the fate of our nation should bombard President Obama’s White House comment line with this message: “President Obama, we will never forgive or forget if you sign the freedom-destroying, pedophile-protecting hate bill.” Call 1-202-456-1111; fax 1-202-456-2461.

We are not begging the President. We are threatening that if he signs the hate bill we will make sure Democrats are defeated in the upcoming midterm elections. We will also make sure Obama’s political career ends three years from now.

In the previous Congress, Democrats passed the hate bill as an amendment to the defense appropriations bill. Yet, as a result of discord in Democrat ranks, Democrat leaders stripped off the hate bill, killing it. The same can happen now if overwhelming pressure is put on Democrats and the President.

Of all issues that concern us this summer, we must concentrate on saving free speech. If we defeat the hate bill, we will still have free speech to debate all other issues.

Even if we do not succeed in persuading Obama to change his mind, massive protest of the hate bill makes it much harder to enforce. It also makes it more difficult for Democrats to pass similar hate crime bills scheduled to move forward in September.

The least that your daily call to the White House will do is slow the Democrat agenda of taking away free speech in America.

But it may keep alive the beating heart of freedom, our First Amendment right to free speech.

View and Download the Flyer Here.

Let the Anti-Defamation League teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians, and spearhead attempts to pass the federal hate crimes bill: http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/intro.asp.

National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015

 
Read more Ted Pike at TruthTellers.org

‘The Rothschild-Soros connection controls voter registration (ACORN), money laundering (Tides), billions in stimulus spending (Apollo), possibly the future of health care (SEIU), finance (Franks), and the Oval Office’s inner workings (Emanuel, Axelrod and Summers)’

By Victor Thorn — AFP

Is Barack Obama the product of a vast socialist conspiracy designed to undermine the fundamental tenets established by our Founding Fathers, all bankrolled and organized by Jewish financiers? The answer is unequivocally yes.

To deconstruct this labyrinth-like network, one must start at the top with Jewish businessman George Soros and his ties to the world’s most powerful Jewish banking family. Journalist, historian and economic researcher William Engdahl sets the stage.

“Soros has been identified as a front man for the Rothschild banking group. Understandably, neither he nor the Rothschilds wants this important fact to be public.” He continues, “Soros’s connection to the ultra-secret international finance circles of the Rothschilds is not just an ordinary or accidental banking connection.”

Finally, in a November 1, 1996 article, Engdahl writes, “From the very first days when Soros created his own investment fund in 1969, he owed his success to his relation to the Rothschild family banking network.”

Soros, through his Open Society Institute, funnels approximately $300 million a year into various liberal venues, including the influential MoveOn.org, which he owns. According to veteran researcher Anton Chaitkin, Soros also hand-picked Barack Obama to challenge Hillary Clinton (and ultimately defeat GOP nominee John McCain). On Sept. 5, 2008, he wrote, “Barack Obama came under special Soros sponsorship in the 2004 U.S. Senate race [and] raised $60,000 for his campaign.” After attaining victory, Obama met personally with Soros, then attended a fundraiser at his home.

Chaitkin elaborates further in “Soros Runs British Foreign Office Coup Against U.S. Elections,” an online article. “On December 4, 2006, two years after getting into the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama went to Soros’s New York office to be interviewed for higher office. Soros then took Obama into a conference room for other politically subordinate billionaires. With money and connections assured, Obama announced for the presidency soon afterward.”

Lets look at the words of Michelle Obama from a June 19, 2008 speech. She said, “We’re going to have to change our traditions and our history.” She explained further on Aug. 25, 2008. “All of us are driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do. We have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be.”

Who, precisely, will determine how our world should be? Mrs. Obama’s poignant phrase was lifted directly from Saul Alinsky, a Chicago-based Jewish extremist who penned the handbook for far-left causes, Rules for Radicals.

To implement his plans to undermine America, an intricate network needed to be established that would spread its tentacles throughout every aspect of society. One of the primary vehicles they utilized was the Tides Foundation, to which Soros contributed $13 million from 1997-2003. Established by Jewish antiwar activist Drummond Pike in 1976, this tax-exempt organization serves a very important function. According to researcher Ben Johnson of Front Page Magazine in September 2004, they “allow high-profile individuals to fund extremist organizations by ‘laundering’ their money through Tides, leaving no paper trail.”

In essence, after taking a 10 percent cut, Tides has fed over $300 million to entities such as cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal, MoveOn.org and those who advocate abortion-on-demand, all the while assuring contributors that they won’t be publicly linked to these causes. One look at the Tide Foundation’s board reveals who calls the shots.

Drummond, senior vice president Gary Schwartz, and executive vice president Ellen Friedman are all Jewish. Pike also used his leverage to bail out ACORN’s welfare rights leader Wade Rathke, after he embezzled $948,507. To protect Rathke, ACORN never contacted law enforcement officials or sought prosecution. Instead, Stephanie Strom of The New York Times wrote on Aug. 17, 2008, “The organization announced that an anonymous supporter had agreed” to pay off the debt. That man was Drummond Pike. To cover their tracks, Arthur Schwartz (also Jewish) now coordinates their slippery public relations.

Of course, Barack Obama began his political career as the chief national trainer for ACORN, which now faces lawsuits in 14 states for voter fraud. Obama’s mentor as a community organizer in Chicago was Gerald Kellman, a Saul Alinksy proteg�. To begin his meteoric rise toward the White House, money originated from what Clarice Feldman of American Thinker calls the “Gang of Four”— Soros, Peter Lewis, Stephen Bing and Herbert & Marion Sandler. All are Jewish billionaires.

One of Obama’s most important backers was Marilyn Katz (Jewish), who oversaw security for the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) and advocated violent guerrilla tactics toward the police (as did Obama associate William Ayers of the Weather Underground). Katz became a fundraising bundler for Obama, as well as hosting fundraisers and serving as an Illinois delegate at the 2008 Democratic National Convention.

The Tides Foundation controls the San Francisco-based Apollo Alliance, which “absolutely believes that government is the solution to all social and economic problems.”

On July 28, Phil Kerpen of Americans for Prosperity described how the “Apollo Alliance is designed to bring together the elements of organized labor with community organizers and green groups.” More importantly, Kerpen revealed that the Apollo Alliance “put out a draft stimulus bill in 2008 . . . that included almost everything that ended up being in the final stimulus bill.”

Van Jones, Obama’s new “green jobs czar,” described the Apollo Alliance as a “grand unified field theory for progressive left causes.” Who exactly is Van Jones? After participating in the 1992 L.A. riots (for which he was arrested and incarcerated), Jones told the East Bay Express on November 2, 2005, “I met all these young radical people of color—I mean, really radical Communists and anarchists. And it was like: this is what I need to be part of. I spent the next 10 years of my life working with a lot of these people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary. I was a rowdy black revolutionary on April 28th, and when the verdicts came down on April 29th, I was a Communist.”

To round out this list, the SEIU (Service Employees International Union) is primarily responsible for what is contained in Obama’s socialized health care bill. Andy Stern and Anna Burger lead the SEIU, both of whom are Jewish cronies of George Soros. Their vice president is Gerald Hudson (Jewish). Pushing this bill and the stimulus package to various media outlets is Robert Borosage (Jewish) of the Institute for America’s Future (also a huge recipient of Soros’s funding). Overseeing the housing and banking industries is none other than Barney Frank (Jewish), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. Last but not least, Key members of Obama’s inner circle—David Axelrod, Lawrence Summers and Rahm Emanuel are Jewish and Bilderberg.

Putting this complicated matter into perspective is educational theorist and critic David Solway. On July 7, 2009 he wrote, “We Jews are a sly and surreptitious people . It pains me to admit this, but candor compels. . . . [T]he best way to bring America to its knees, to weaken its will to survive, to cleverly turn it against itself, was to do everything in our considerable arsenal of means to deliver the White House to Barack Obama.”

The conspiracy has been completed, and now the Jewish Rothschild-Soros connection controls voter registration (ACORN), money laundering (Tides), billions in stimulus spending (Apollo), possibly the future of health care (SEIU), finance (Franks), and the Oval Office’s inner workings (Emanuel, Axelrod and Summers).

Victor Thorn is a hard-hitting researcher, journalist and the author of many books on 9-11 and the New World Order. These include 9-11 Evil: The Israeli Role in 9-11 and Phantom Flight 93.

Subscribe to American Free Press. Online subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK – HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR – By Michael Piper.

Print subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six free issues of Whole Body Health: $59 Order on this website or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS .

 
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/behind_barack_obama_188.html

Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute – as long as full credit is given to American Free Press – 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003

Against the international background of heavy Jewish involvement in Communism, did the South African experience show any parallels? Perhaps the best way to gain an insight into this topic is to quote from four books, three of which are by Jewish authors:

A History of Communism in South Africa by Dr Henry R Pike (published by Christian Mission International of South Africa, Germiston, South Africa (1985, 1988).

A large number of Jews have worked to promote Communism in South Africa, as Pike’s book indicates. Many of these Jews were involved in the organization of trade unions, particularly black trade unions. Some of the names mentioned by Pike are A Z Berman ‘a noted Marxist’ who headed the Industrial Socialist League in Cape Town; the communist writer David Shub, Solly Sachs, secretary of the Garment Workers Union and expelled from and then readmitted to the South African Communist Party, Bennie Weinbren who directed the Non-European Trade Union Federation, Issy Diamond, Abraham Levy, Hymie Levin, Issie Wolfson, Julius Lewin, Louis Joffe, Dr Max Joffe, Molly (Zelikowitz) Wolton, Lazar Bach, Rebecca (Notlowitz) Bunting, Fanny Klenerman, Michael Harmel, Sam Kahn, Katy Kagan, Eli Weinberg, Yetta Barenblatt, Hymie Barsel, Leon and Norman Levy, Lionel Forman, Jacqueline and Rowley Arenstein, Erroland Dorothy Shanley, Monty Berman, Bertram Hirson and Neville Rubin.

Dr Pike (p 212-3) quotes from a South African Government Gazette Extraordinary (vol VI 16 Nov 1962 pp 2-28) which listed ‘persons who have been office-bearers, officers, members or active supporters of the Communist Party of South Africa’. The list included 66 ‘clearly identifiable as Jews’, 61 ‘white non-Jews’ and two uncertain. At the time, the South African population was approximately 3 million whites, while the South African Jewish population was 110 000 (World Almanac 1958 p270). So there was approximately one Jew for every 26 white non-Jews in the country. If there had been an equal distribution of Communist involvement between non-Jewish whites and Jews, the Jewish membership of the Communist Party should have been one-twenty-sixth the white Gentile representation. Instead, we find slightly more Jews as members. In other words, Jews were almost thirty times more likely to become members of the Communist Party than were white Gentiles. If Jews with non-Jewish names were also counted, the ratio would be likely to have been considerably higher.

In theory this could be explained away as simple Jewish concern for the welfare of the underdog, the lowest classes, and in the South African context, evidence of Jewish sympathies across racial barriers, or non-racism. In testing such a hypothesis to see whether this is indeed the case, we can look at another instance. Such concerns have been notoriously, and very conspicuously, almost totally absent in the protracted conflict in the Middle East. There, international Jewish support has been overwhelmingly and steadfastly in favor of the Jewish Israelis, and not of the Palestinians who have lost their country, and in thousands of cases their lives, to the violent settlers from Eastern Europe and America. After all, the entire territory was under Palestinian political control until 1947. The Jewish population of the area in 1917 was a mere 7% of the 700 000 inhabitants. The other 93% were Arabs. In 1947 the United Nations under tremendous US pressure gave the Zionists, who owned only about 6% of the land, 56% of the territory of Palestine. Since then, there has been a steady take-over of the remaining territory by force, violence, warfare, bribery and stealth.

Perhaps you might think Dr Pike is just ‘anti-Semitic’ and his approach is biased. But have a look at the next author:

Jews and Zionism: the South African Experience (1910-67), by Dr Gideon Shimoni (Oxford University Press, 1980). This book appears to have been written for a Jewish readership.

Two extended quotes from the book will serve as a summary of the situation some decades ago.

[Dr Shimoni was born in South Africa to parents from Lithuania, but settled in Israel where he lectured at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and where he gained post-graduate degrees in Jewish history. While bitterly contemptuous of South Africa under the apartheid system, Dr Shimoni in effect identifies with the concept of geographically based ethnic groupings that was the basis of the South African system. This kind of irony, not to say hypocrisy, is typical of Jews opposed to 'racism' in Europe, the US or South Africa.]

Dr Shimoni writes of ‘..the extraordinary salience of Jewish individuals in the white opposition to the regime of apartheid. Throughout this period Jewish names kept appearing in every facet of the struggle: amongst reformist liberals; in the radical Communist opposition; in the courts, whether as defendants or as counsel for the defense; in the lists of bannings and amongst those who fled the country to evade arrest. Their prominence was particularly marked in the course of the Treason Trial which occupied an important place in the news media throughout the second half of the 1950′s. This trial began in December 1956, when 156 people were arrested on charges of treason in the form of a conspiracy to overthrow the state by violence and to replace it with a state based on Communism. Twenty-three of those arrested were Whites, more than half of them Jews. They included Yetta Barenblatt, Hymie Barsel, Lionel (Rusty) Bernstein, Leon Levy, Norman Levy,Sydney Shall, Joe Slovo, Ruth (First) Slovo, Sonia Bunting, Lionel Forman, Isaac Horvitch, Ben Turok, Jacqueline Arenstein, Errol Shanley, Dorothy Shanley. To top it all, at one stage in the trial the defense counsel was led by Israel Maisels, while the prosecutor was none other than Oswald Pirow. The juxtaposition was striking: Maisels, the prominent Jewish communal leader, defending those accused of trying to overthrow White supremacy; Pirow, the extreme Afrikaner Nationalist and former Nazi sympathizer, defending White supremacy.’ (pp. 227-8).

‘In this extended five-year period between the emergence of violent opposition and its effective suppression, the prominent involvement of individual Jews was in the public eye more than ever before. This was even more so than in the dramatic circumstances of the ‘Rivonia arrests’. On 11 July 1963 the police raided the home of Arthur Goldreich in Rivonia near Johannesburg, where it captured, by surprise, the leadership cadre of the Umkonto we Sizwe underground. Seventeen people were arrested.. Five of those arrested were Whites, all of them Jews. They were: Arthur Goldreich, Lionel Bernstein, Hilliard Festenstein, Dennis Goldberg and Bob Hepple.. [There was an] overwhelming impression that Jews were in the forefront of the White radicals who were trying to overthrow the system of White supremacy in South Africa. When the secret African Resistance Movement (ARM) was crushed during 1964, it again became evident that many Jews were involved. One of its founders was identified as Monty Berman.. others were Adrian Leftwich and Bertram (Baruch) Hirson. Among those who were associated with ARM were Neville Rubin and Michael Schneider [and ] others implicated were Frederick and Rhoda Prager, Raymond Eisenstein and Hugh Lewin..’ (pp. 232-3).

Dr Shimoni records with obvious distaste the wording of an Afrikaans letter in a newspaper criticizing this fundamentally hypocritical proclivity of Jews: ‘They (the Jews) themselves are the most exclusive apartheid people, yet they exert themselves here for integration.’ While Jews themselves have shown no intention to integrate or merge with the African masses, they have been hyper-critical of mainstream whites who are reluctant to follow this route, criticizing churches with segregationist policies, while their synagogues have remained ethnically 100% Jewish.

Cutting Through the Mountain: Interviews with South African Activists edited by Immanuel Suttner (Viking-Penguin, England and USA 1997). This book also appears to have been written for a Jewish readership. It is a thick expensively bound book of over 600 pages, financially supported by the Liberty Life Foundation created by the Jewish mega-capitalist Donald Gordon. Suttner says ‘a disproportionate number of individual Jews played a part in transforming South Africa into a more just society. There are two streams: those who fought ‘within the system’ as jurists, members of parliament, via the media, or in civil society, and those who entered ‘illegal’ organizations which were socialist, communist or mass-based in character.’ (p.2) He says the book ‘welcomes (these Jews) back not only as worthy South Africans, socialists, communists or liberals, but as worthy Jews’ (p.3). Some of the ‘remarkable people’ (page vii) who are heroes of the book include:

Taffy Adler who was involved in the 1970s and ’80s in the ‘formation and consolidation of the black trade union movement’. His father was a Lithuanian Jew who emigrated to South Africa in 1926 and who ‘was tremendously loyal to Stalin and Russian communism’ right up to the fall of the Soviet Union in 1989. His uncle, Michael Harmel, became general secretary of the South African Communist Party.

Ray Alexander (Rachel Alexandrowich) arrived in South Africa from Latvia and joined the SA Communist Party five days later. She played a leading role in the organization of trade unions. She was married to Jack Simons, a ‘devoted communist’ and lecturer at the University of Cape Town.

Pauline Podbrey (Podbrez) born in Lithuania came to South Africa at the age of eleven. She joined the Communist Youth League, run by Max Joffe, and the related Labor League of Youth, run by Hilda Bernstein. Of the Communist Party she says ‘the majority of the members were Jewish…looking back on it now, it seems as if everybody was Jewish.’ (*p52). She married a prominent Indian trade unionist and Communist Party leader, resulting in her mother being ostracized by the South African Jewish community, although it has been and still is normal practice for this community to depict white non-Jews as despicable prejudiced racists.

Joe Slovo born in Lithuania, came to South Africa where he joined the Young Communist League at the age of sixteen. He became a central member of the Communist Party of South Africa and a ‘hard-line Stalinist’, becoming general secretary in 1986. He concentrated on building up Umkhonto we Sizwe, the ‘armed wing’ of the ANC (African National Congress), becoming its chief of staff and head strategist in the campaign of bombings directed at civilian targets and other acts of terror. He only abandoned his commitment to Stalinism and Soviet-style communism when the Soviet bloc started falling apart in the late 1980s and it became necessary to do so. A key strategist representing the ANC in the negotiations with De Klerk’s government in the hand over of power, he became a minister in Mandela’s Cabinet when the ANC came to power in 1994. He died of cancer a few years later. His daughter published an autobiographical book describing her father’s affair with a Jewish Communist friend’s wife and his utter refusal to acknowledge the son born of this relationship.

Gill Marcus, the daughter of parents involved with the Communist Party, a long-time member of the Party and of the ANC, is now a Deputy Governor of the South African Reserve Bank after being a member of the first Mandela Cabinet.

Ronnie Kasrils became a central figure in the South African Communist Party and head of military intelligence of the ANC’s military wing. He became Deputy Minister of Defense in the Mandela government, and is now Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry.

Traitors’ End: The Rise and Fall of the Communist Movement in Southern Africa by Nathaniel Weyl (Tafelberg Press, South Africa and Arlington House, USA, 1970).

‘For the most part, the Jews had come to South Africa from Lithuania at the turn of the century.. They had been popular at first, but by the mid-1930′s this was no longer the case. The Jews had become heavily urbanized. In Johannesburg, they constituted 17 per cent of the population and were sufficiently conspicuous so that the metropolis was sometimes referred to, not as Jo’burg, but as Jewburg. They aroused envy and some rancor during the years of depression because they controlled a large part of the business of Johannesburg and other cities.. Anti-Semitism was fed by the economic discontent.. A perhaps more important ingredient was the prominence of South African Jews in finance, mining and the other economic command posts of the nation, on the one hand, and in revolutionary and racial reform movements on the other. From the outset, the Jews had been prominent in the Communist Party and its various fronts. They were equally conspicuous in the various movements that sought to break down the barriers separating the White from the non-White population. South African anti-Semitic propaganda.. depicted the Jew as a deracinated element who sought to destroy White civilization and nationalism with the twin weapons of Communism and international finance. Given the visible prominence of Jews in both areas, this doctrine fell on receptive ears.’

The famous Rivonia Trial of the 1960′s resulted from a raid on a farm near Johannesburg in which many of the top leadership of the Communist party were detained. The White defendants were virtually all Jews, including Dennis Goldberg, ‘a civil engineer who served as commander in a Communist camp that trained young guerrillas’, and Lionel ‘Rusty’ Bernstein, the only prisoner to be acquitted. A Johannesburg architect, Bernstein ‘admitted to having been a Communist for 25 years, but successfully alleged that he had left the party, without, however, changing his revolutionary convictions.’ (Weyl pp 122-3). Amongst those implicated during the trial were the Jews Joe Slovo and his wife Ruth First, Bob Hepple and Michael Harmel. ‘Operation Mayibuye [a plan for guerrilla warfare, armed invasion of South Africa and Communist conquest of the country] was drafted by Arthur Goldreich, perhaps the most important of the men captured by the South African Police at Rivonia. Goldreich managed to bribe his way out of prison.. During the trial, Goldreich was referred to by Nelson Mandela and other defendants as a military expert who served as an officer in the Israeli war for independence.. Goldreich’s plan was modeled on the guerrilla strategy of the Chinese Communists.. Goldreich’s notebook shows constant preoccupation with the practical details of revolutionary war. He goes into the types of explosives and fuses needed and their characteristics’ (Weyl pp124, 127-8).

‘On December 16, 1966, the United Nations branded Rhodesia “a threat to international peace”. President Johnson’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Arthur Goldberg, immediately pledged United States support for sanctions against Rhodesia “in order to drive home to the illegal regime (of Ian Smith) that the international community will not tolerate the existence of a discriminatory system based on minority rule in defiance of the United Nations and its principles.”Ambassador Goldberg’s logic was extraordinary, to say the least. Over half of the 122 UN member states had governments not based upon majority rule As for the United Nations statement that Rhodesia threatened international peace, the statement simply reversed the facts of the matter. Rhodesia was exposed to attacks by guerrillas, armed, financed, trained and abetted by Black African member states of the United Nations in flagrant defiance of the UN Charter.. AmbassadorGoldberg had shown on previous occasions that, where racial issues were involved, he practiced a double standard of morality in favor of Black demands.. Ambassador Goldberg was not alone in his fanatical hostility to White rule in Africa..’ (Weyl pp 162-3).

Jews in South Africa in the main and those mentioned above in particular have all been pushing for a majoritarian government in which population numbers effectively mean that whites have no say over their own affairs. The new ANC-dominated South Africa is proclaimed to be a ‘democracy’, although a leading political scientist, Professor Hermann Giliomee, has described the election system as a simple ethnic census. Whites, for example, have no effective power over the government as far as their own interests, such as schooling for their children or their language rights are concerned. The Constitutional Court, supposedly the custodian of these rights, has an over-representation of Jews who have shown little sympathy for white non-Jewish rights. Even the traditionally English South African game of cricket is being transformed – the Jewish director of the cricket board, Dr Ali Bacher, is doing everything in his power to turn cricket in the country into a black-dominated sport.

There are various kinds of hypocrisy at work here. Authors such as Immanuel Suttner perhaps unwittingly communicate their clear belief that Jews are morally better than South African whites, because of their political stance. This in itself is not only racist but also not true. We can study the attitude of South African Jews to Middle Eastern issues to see whether they really do display a genuine moral superiority. Until a few years ago South African Jews gave more per capita to Israel than any other Jewish community, including that of America (Suttner p. 420).

‘When Ronnie Kasrils, a leader of the ANC’s armed campaign against apartheid South Africa, returned home after 27 years in exile, he was lionized by a local Jewish establishment belatedly eager to associate itself with the struggle. His picture was put in the Jewish Museum in Cape Town and his name in the Book of Honor. The Jewish community basked in his reflected glory’ (Fair Lady 22 May 2002 p.37). South Africa’s Chief Rabbi Cyril Harris officiated at the funeral of Joe Slovo, calling Slovo ‘a better Jew than most’ (ibid p.39). Who was Slovo? He was general secretary of the Communist Party of South Africa and chief of staff of the armed terrorist wing of the ANC (African National Congress). When Kasrils, in an awkward position because of his cabinet post in the ANC government which includes several very influential Moslems, became one of a very small number of Jews to speak out against Israeli policies against the Palestinian people in Palestine, his name became mud. He signed a petition along with 286 other Jews to the effect that Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians does not have their blessing. The South African Zionist Federation quickly organized a rival petition in support of Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon, and collected 11500 signatures. Helen Suzman, the veteran anti-Apartheid Jewish member of the South African parliament and consequently the recipient of numerous international honors and awards, ‘believes that everything Israel has done has been retaliatory’ (ibid p39) in spite of the fact that the Israelis, with support from Jews elswhere particularly in the US and its government, have been able to take over Palestine with absolute impunity, disregarding with absolute and violent contempt the lawful rights of the Palestinians. This hypocrisy is very common in the Zionist community which forms the overwhelmingly dominant part of South African Jewry.

No candid discussion of the issues raised above was permitted to take place in South Africa before the fall of white rule owing to the ownership pattern of the newspaper cartel. There has been much talk of a ‘Jewish Capitalist-Communist nexus’ – we have to recognize that monopoly capital has an affinity with Communism. According to Antony Sutton (Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution) international bankers funded the Bolshevik Revolution. In 1917, Trotsky and 200 revolutionaries were literally transferred from New York’s Lower East Side to St. Petersburg to foment the revolution in Russia. Jews are internationally synonymous with hyper-capitalism or monopoly-capitalism, where ever-greater financial power is continually being sought, and there is the impression that the hunger behind this urge is insatiable. Media control is an important part of this program, because criticism must be stifled at all costs. These powerful people are ever-seeking to instruct or coerce non-Jewish people of European ancestry in the direction of non-discrimination, but always supporting their own country with its fundamental racial discrimination whereby Palestinians born in Jerusalem have no rights, while even atheistic Jews born in Milwaukee or Miami have citizenship full rights in Israel.

The large reserves of gold, diamonds and other natural wealth attracted Jews in large numbers from Germany, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland and Russia. The discovery of gold in the Boer republic of the Transvaal turned out to be tragically unfortunate for the Boers. According to J A Hobson, an English liberal-socialist thinker and correspondent who reported on the Boer War, ‘a little ring of international financiers’, mainly Jews, led Britain into the war for their own selfish capitalist interests. (Hobson, The War in South Africa ­ its causes and effects (New York, Macmillan, 1900, pp194, 184, 190). Boer farms and towns were burnt to the ground. Boer women and children were herded into concentration camps, where 26 000 died through epidemics and unsanitary conditions. But the Jews gained a wonderful ascendancy in the gold and diamond industry, with leading names including Barney Barnato, Solly Joel and Lionel Phillips. Eventually the Oppenheimer family, with financial support from Rothschild interests, controlled not only the largest gold mines in the country but also the world diamond cartel De Beers and a very large part of the South African economy, as well as the English language newspaper monopoly. De Beers in recent decades has been often implicated in trading in ‘blood-diamonds’ from war zones in Africa. (The international diamond trade in New York and Amsterdam is also largely Jewish-controlled.) The Oppenheimer press cartel normally depicted white efforts in South Africa to find political self-determination, including the apartheid policy of parallel or separate development, as totally and utterly reprehensible and unacceptable. At the same time the cartel ensured that the Israeli State did not come in for parallel criticism for its incomparably inhumane and violent oppression of the native Palestinians. The Jews have found it useful to their ethnic agenda to exacerbate tensions between white and black in South Africa, with the clear objective of subverting the apartheid idea of ethnic self-determination for a situation in which non-Jewish whites would be subject to unfettered black political and social control. Since this goal has been achieved, Jews have been emigrating in large numbers, primarily to the United States. Although scornful of white non-Jews for racism during the apartheid era, none of these Jewish emigrants are known to have moved to any African country. As Immanuel Suttner says ‘The Jewish community.. will likely continue to shrink through emigration, and those Jews who choose to stay in South Africa, and choose to involve themselves fully in South Africa’s unfolding story, face a difficult period of redefining their role and finding a niche in which they believe they are relevant and useful.’ (Cutting Through the Mountain p.4).

Why are Jews prominent as political activists in all western countries, but definitely not on behalf of the Palestinians, as fifty years of history have shown? Why were US Congressmen Stephen J. Solarz and Howard Wolpe, instrumental in securing financial sanctions against the South African apartheid regime, but ‘unwavering in their commitments to Israel’ (ex-Congressman Paul Findley, They Dare to Speak Out: People and Insttutions Confront Israel’s Lobby (1985) p70-71). Are hidden tribal agendas a factor in American politics?

George Steiner, Cambridge professor of English and comparative literature, author of numerous books such as Tolstoy or Dostoyevsky, Language and Silence etc, set out his sobering views in a novel called The Portage to San Cristobal of A.H. (1981). Strangely enough (Dr Steiner is a Jew) he hypothetically ‘gives Hitler the chance to defend himself before a Jewish court’, ‘to defend the indefensible’. How on earth can a Cambridge professor, a Jew, in effect defend A.H., the ‘greatest embodiment of evil in human history’? What can be his argument? In summary (Steiner pp 120-126):

Point One: ‘The Nazi race doctrines were but a “parody” of the Jewish doctrine of “a chosen people, chosen by God for his own, the only race on earth chosen, exalted, made singular among mankind.. to set a race apart, to hold before it a promised land”.’

Point Two: ‘The Jew’s addiction to the ideal.. “It is no accident that Marx and his minions were Jews, that the congregations of Bolshevism ­ Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, Kamenev, the whole fanatic, murderous pack ­ were of Israel..’

Point Three: “You have exaggerated. Grossly. Hysterically. What were Rotterdam or Coventry compared to Dresden and Hiroshima? Did I invent the camps? Ask the Boers.. To whom did you hand over millions, tens of millions of men and women from Prague to the Baltic? What did (Solzhenitsyn) say? That Stalin had slaughtered thirty million. I was a man of a murderous time, but a small man compared to him. That he perfected genocide (of the kulaks) when I was still a nameless scribbler in Munich. My boys used their fists and their whips. I won’t deny it. The times stank of hunger and blood. But when a man spat out the truth they would stop their fun. Stalin’s torturers worked for the pleasure of the thing. To make men befoul themselves, to obtain confessions that are lies, insanities, obscene jokes. The truth only made them more bestial. It is not I who assert these things: it is your own Jewish survivors, your historians, the sage of the Gulag. Who, then was the great destroyer, whose blood-lust the more implacable? Stalin’s or mine? Our terrors were a village carnival compared to his. Our camps covered absurd acres; he had strung wire and death-pits around a continent. Yet Stalin died in bed, and yet you hunt me down like a rabid dog..”

Point Four: ‘Zionism was shaped in the image of German nationalism.. “The Holocaust gave you the courage of injustice, to drive the Arab out of his home, out of his field, because he was without resource, because he was in your way, knowing that those you had driven out were rotting in refugee camps, not ten miles away, buried alive in despair and lunatic dreams of vengeance.. You used the Holocaust to create Israel.. Should you not honour me who have made your long, vacuous dream of Zion a reality?”.’

Why is anti-Palestinianism, without doubt a form of anti-Semitism, not ‘politically incorrect’? As various commentators for years have been pointing out, the Palestinians have been made for decades to pay for the Holocaust. Is this fair or just? Is it logical or even reasonable? Does it matter? Does anything matter?

 
Article Source: Die Boerekryger

Real Jew News

OBAMA SIGNED HIS $787 BILLION STIMULUS PLAN into law on February 17, 2009. But the question is, will it work? Will Obama’s stimulus bill actually stimulate the economy? Many economic experts, such as Scott Walker, say that Obama’s stimulus “looks more like 25 years of government expansion jammed into one bill than it does an effective stimulus plan.”

Obama’s stimulus plan is short on creating sustainable jobs & long on social goals that will not impact positively on economic activity. Obama’s stimulus is unfocused & spreads a lot of money around on social programs that will have no lasting impact on the American economy. The thrust of tax-payers’ money will be used to fund not only social programs, but government-financed health care, education programs for the poor, digging ditches & rebuilding bridges, (how long can these jobs last?), and so-called green initiatives.

Obama’s stimulus bill also includes allocating billions in newly printed money by the Fed for food stamps, child care services, homeless shelters & soup kitchens, computerization of personal medical records, unemployment insurance, community-based outreach programs, and job-training for jobs that do not & will not exist due to intensified outsourcing to China & India of both labour and hi-tech jobs. (Try calling United Airlines, McAfee Computer Services, and Western Union, and someone named Omar or Harshad will answer.)

AND MOST ALARMING OF ALL – Obama’s Stimulus bill gives a whopping $1 billion to Jewish social service providers who already are oozing in Jewish wealth.

In short, Obama’s stimulus plan will only delay the inevitable day of reckoning for the American people. View Entire Story Here & Here.

OBAMA’S STIMULUS PLAN IS A SCHEME hatched by Jewish financial insiders. Representing the interests of Wall Street’s Jewish financial institutions, a group of Zionist Jews, (loyal to Jewish interests before those of America), have been appointed by Obama as his economic advisors:

Timothy Geithner: Treasury Secretary – Jewish.

Steven Rattner: Treasury Advisor For Auto Sector – Jewish.

Larry Summers: Economic Advisor to the President – Jewish.

Robert Rubin: Economic Advisor to the President – Jewish.

Alan Blinder: Economic Advisor to the President – Jewish.

Jason Furman: Director Of Economic Policy – Jewish.

Peter Orszag: Head of Budget – Jewish.

Jon Leibowitz: Chairman Of FTC – Jewish.

See Even More Jewish Advisors Here.

Adding to this list of Jewish-Zionists on Obama’s economic advisors team, is his administrative staff of Zionist Jews:

Rahm Emanuel: Chief of Staff – Jewish.

David Axelrod: Senior Advisor to the President – Jewish.

Ronald Klain: Chief of Staff to the Vice President – Jewish.

See Even More Jewish Administrative Staff Here.

OBAMA SIGNED HIS $787 BILLION STIMULUS PLAN into law on February 17, 2009. But the question is, will it work? Will Obama’s stimulus bill actually stimulate the economy? Many economic experts, such as Scott Walker, say that Obama’s stimulus “looks more like 25 years of government expansion jammed into one bill than it does an effective stimulus plan.”

Obama’s stimulus plan is short on creating sustainable jobs & long on social goals that will not impact positively on economic activity. Obama’s stimulus is unfocused & spreads a lot of money around on social programs that will have no lasting impact on the American economy. The thrust of tax-payers’ money will be used to fund not only social programs, but government-financed health care, education programs for the poor, digging ditches & rebuilding bridges, (how long can these jobs last?), and so-called green initiatives.

Obama’s stimulus bill also includes allocating billions in newly printed money by the Fed for food stamps, child care services, homeless shelters & soup kitchens, computerization of personal medical records, unemployment insurance, community-based outreach programs, and job-training for jobs that do not & will not exist due to intensified outsourcing to China & India of both labour and hi-tech jobs. (Try calling United Airlines, McAfee Computer Services, and Western Union, and someone named Omar or Harshad will answer.)

AND MOST ALARMING OF ALL – Obama’s Stimulus bill gives a whopping $1 billion to Jewish social service providers who already are oozing in Jewish wealth.

In short, Obama’s stimulus plan will only delay the inevitable day of reckoning for the American people. View Entire Story Here & Here.

THE SHYSTER BANKERS WIN – TAXPAYERS LOSE“OBAMA’S STIMULUS & BAILOUT PLAN,” according to former Treasury Secretary, Paul Craig Roberts, “will redistribute wealth from American taxpayers to the shyster banksters who have destroyed American jobs, ruined the retirement plans of tens of millions of Americans, and worsened the situation of millions of people worldwide who naively trusted American financial institutions.”

“The ongoing theft has simply been recast,” Roberts continues, “instead of using fraudulent financial instruments, the banksters are using government policy.”

Obama’s stimulus is a classic bait-and-switch. Once the highways are built and social-service case loads have increased, American tax payers, (what’s left of them who will have any income to pay taxes from), will be stuck with the bill to pay for and maintain the new roads and services.

Obama’s stimulus is also a bait-and-switch on employment. While the stimulus package creates federal and construction jobs, once the money runs out, those workers will lose their jobs. Even worse, most of the money is actually allocated for bailing out failed state and local governments. Then, after $135 billion in the federal aid gets spent, many states will be staring down budgetary black holes unless they initiate dramatic spending cuts by which many jobs will be eliminated. Read Scott Walker’s Analysis Here.

AND WHO ARE THE WINNERS? The Jewish loan-sharks who own the private banking consortium known as the Federal Reserve System and who enter billions of dollars out of thin air in their books and CHARGE INTEREST on their LOANS.

BUT WHO ARE THE LOSERS? Hard working and willing-to-work Americans are the losers and will lose even more once the Jewish-owned Fed comes collecting for funding (with interest) Obama’s stimulus bill.

And the Zionist Jews, (who always remain wealthy during times of economic distress), along with their synagogue buddies at the Federal Reserve who are tied to the Rothschild global-banking elite, will be laughing all the way to their Jewish banks…

Source: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=380

Also related:  Stop Intervening in the Economy, by Ron Paul

Assimilated Jews Must Address “Dark Side” of Judaism

By Henry Makow

Stephen Bloom represents the love of fairness and justice typical of many liberal American Jews. A journalism professor at the University of Iowa, he saw the opening of a Kosher meatpacking plant in Postville Iowa in 1987 as an opportunity to learn about his religion and study the Jewish-gentile dynamic in microcosm. He discovered more about Judaism and the causes of anti-Semitism than perhaps he wanted to know.

This is from his “Postville: A Clash of Cultures in Heartland America” published in 2000:

“Initially I had gone to Postville to learn from the Hasidim, to share with them a sense of identity and belonging. Instead, what the Postville Hasidim ultimately offered me was a glimpse of the dark side of my own faith, a look at Jewish extremists whose behavior not only made the Postville locals wince, but made me wince, too.

I didn’t want to partake in Hasidim’s vision that called on Jews to unite against the goyim and assimilation. The world, even in Iowa, was too bountiful to base my likes and dislikes solely on religion. The word Hasid …literally means “the pious one,” but the Postville Hasidim..were anything but pious. You couldn’t become casual friends with them…They required total submission to their schema of right and wrong, Jew vs. Christian — or you were the enemy. (291)

ROCKY RIDE

The influx of hundreds of Orthodox Jewish families into a tiny Christian farming community in the Northeastern corner of Iowa was rocky from the start. Yes the Jews had a seemingly wholesome family life and a pretense of piety. But it soon became apparent they wanted nothing to do with their Christian neighbors. They were there to make money and the non-Jews, (goyim) whether Postville merchants or immigrant workers, were barely different from the cattle on their assembly lines.

The meatpacking plant, Agriprocessors, filed for bankruptcy this month after the owner Sholom Rubashkin was arrested for bank fraud in regard to a $35 million loan. This after the State of Iowa levied $10 million in fines for 9000 violations involving illegal wage deductions and child labor. Then in June, the company was accused of helping illegal aliens forge documents. Four hundred hapless laborers from Guatemala to Palau were arrested and jailed.

When the plant closed, hundreds of workers were left destitute while turkeys languished in trailers outside the gates unfed. The town struggled to regain its footing, probably relieved to be rid of this mixed blessing.

In August, a delegation of distinguished rabbis and communal functionaries spent three hours touring the plant, met briefly with local Christian clergy and social activists, and gave the operation a clean bill of health. They found no evidence, as one rabbi put it, to suggest that “someone should not buy things from Agriprocessors.”

“A three-hour tour could not uncover the extensive, “egregious” child labor violations that the Iowa state labor commissioner reported to the state attorney general just five days after the rabbis left town. The labor commissioner said he had “never seen anything like it” in his 30 years in the field…” the Jewish Daily Forward wrote in an Editorial August 7. 

“Three hours wouldn’t turn up the voluminous evidence of abuse gathered by the Forward when we first broke the Agriprocessors story two years ago. We found compelling indications of sexual harassment, shorted wages, favoritism and bribery in work assignments, inadequate safety training and horrific work accidents in the place we called a “Kosher Jungle.”

IN DENIAL

This editorial suggests that the rabbis were in contravention of the “Babylonian Talmud.” This reflects the naivety of assimilated Jews about the true nature of the Talmud, the central document of Judaism. The Talmud regards Gentiles as cattle and preaches hatred against Christians.

This is born out by the behavior of the Postville Hasidim. Stephen Bloom wanted to explore his Jewish roots and was put under the tutelage of one “Lazar”, a “model Lubavitcher, a mensch as well as a tzaddik” (wise man.) “I am a racist,” Lazar told Bloom right off the bat. The Jews have persisted throughout history because “we are better and smarter.” (192)

“Wherever we go, we don’t adapt to the place or the people, Lazar preached…”It’s always been like that and alwaysw will be like that. It’s the place and the people who have to adapt to us.”

Bloom reflected: “Lazar’s comment underscored the Hasidim’s contempt for non-Jews, which wasn’t limited to Postville gentiles but to all Christians…Hasidim like Lazar have a totl disinterest in anything or anyone who isn’t Jewish…The Hasidim were waging a cultural holy war…Their world was Jew vs. non-Jew…If you didn’t agree, you were at fault, part of the problem. You were paving the way for the ultimate destruction of the Jews, the world’s Chosen People. There was no room for compromise…no room for anything but total and complete submission.” (196-198)

This extends to business, which is a form of aggression against gentiles.  “I don’t feel like a Jew unless I bargain,” Lazar told him. “A Jew has to feel he got something for the absolute lowest price or he feels rotten.”  After reaching a deal with a gentile, the Hasid boasted of not keeping the terms or taking his time to pay. Bloom compared it to hunting: “The Hasidim not only [bargained] with alacrity, but enjoyed boasting about the terrain, equipment, first sighting and ultimate kill.” (211)

Bloom relates a particularly shameful incident told by store owner. A Hasid pretended he had paid in advance for some merchandise, grabbed it and ran out of the store.

CONCLUSION

It doesn’t take a genius to realize that behavior resulting from the Talmud is the real cause of Anti-Semitism.

But the implications are far more serious. Meyer Amschel Rothschild was a Talmudist. This Satanic hatred of humanity, and Christians in particular, is driving the New World Order. There is a direct line between the Crucifixion of Christ, who symbolized the universal God of Love, 9-11 and the New World Order in terms of the degradation of humanity to cattle through war and depression. If this logic is correct, humanity’s fate is to be crucified like Christ or otherwise slaughtered.

Like Stephen Bloom and myself, 90% of American Jews are secular and ignorant of the Talmud. They would find its views abhorrent. But these attitudes are the hidden agenda of Zionism and organized Jewry. A gentile elite consisting of Freemasons (the Illuminati Order) also has been enlisted to advance this agenda. Barack Obama and the whole Washington establishment belongs to it.

The Jewish role in the New World Order imperils humanity and assimilated Jews. As conditions deteriorate, anti-Semitism will become rampant. Jews must recognize that Judaism is not a religion but a conspiracy against humanity. Zionism, Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, Neo Conservatism, Feminism are all instruments of this conspiracy which seeks world government tyranny by the Masonic Jewish bankers. Society has been brainwashed to reject the Protocols of the Elders of Zion which explains the methodology. This document is not anti-Semitic; it is Satanic.

Assimilated Jews need to dis-associate from the Jewish enterprise and re-invent themselves as a people, recognizing how, like other peoples, they have been deceived and exploited by their so-called leaders.

“Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact.”

Henry Makow, Ph.D. is the inventor of the board game Scruples and author of “A Long Way to go for a Date.” His articles on feminism and the New World Order are archived at his web site. Henry is a regular columnist for Ether Zone.

(“EURO” being the “European-American Unity and RIGHTS Organization founded by Dr. David Duke).

By John de Nugent

First, our rights as whites were sure violated:

*A hotel canceling the meeting after death threats on the manager and his family!

*At another hotel where Dr. Duke was of course peacefully staying, he was expelled by the manager — and two cops!! — from his hotel room!

*De Soto County (Mississippi) passed an anti-gathering ordinance against EURO — in total disregard of the First Amendment’s guarantee of the right to peaceful assembly!

*And a police helicopter and bullying cops then terrorized a comrade out in the countryside into not letting us use even his rural home location (out in the sticks) for the meeting!

Here is a Podblanc of me being interviewed by ABC-TV, WPTY, Memphis Eyewitness News, at the Duke-EURO conference! (I was already in mid-interview when I heard from a friend that David wanted us to all shun the media for several reasons.)

You can tell I was outraged, especially after the bimbo reporter (the one seen on the TV clip) kept badgering me to explain why Duke was, quote, “targeting Memphis”! (The city is now about 61% black, and only 34% whites. It also is the fourth most dangerous large city in the nation for crime. I am glad Dr. Duke decided to show the flag right there! Memphis needs MORE whites, not less!)

I was also interviewed for ten minutes in the French language by Canal+, which was really an honor of sorts for me, since I used to watch Canal+ a lot in France in 2004-05. “Canal+” (with “Canal” meaning Channel” in French) is a gigantic, dominant French television news and entertainment network — not unlike HBO here in the United States. Here is their website. http://www.canalplus.fr I have yet to see the interview broadcast, yet some day soon it may be in view of my plans. Canal+ was of course a bit nonplussed to meet a real American in Tennessee who spoke almost perfect French! (The crew had interviewed the courageous Pastor Tom Robb before, at his home/headquarters in Arkansas, as Robb himself told me when I met that fine gentleman and his talented family, they had been pretty fair in their reporting).

Here is a picture of me speaking at the EURO conference.

And here is the audiofile. My part went from 00:00 to 10:40. BTW, my voice was hoarse from several TV interviews against a loud background noise, the exhaustion of driving through the night for part of the 900 miles, and from hawking the special Barnes Reviews to the loud and enthusiastic crowd after the sessions.

On the positive side (and there was so much good that happened there), the conference boasted about 200 attendees, yes, 200 true and loyal white stalwarts who braved the uncertainty about the conference and rallied to David Duke and his team when the going got rough.

When I first heard that David’s conference was in trouble, Margi Huffstickler, Henrik Holappa and I were all in Washington, D.C. for Henrik’s political asylum hearing (which is costing us plenty of dollar$).

Caption: Henrik [at right] outside the a$ylum lawyer’s office in Pittsburgh.

Pictured below is the Fearless Finn speaking, for the first time in his entire life, to 200 people (at the EURO conference), and in a foreign language for him to boot, namely English! I think you will agree he already speaks better English than President George Bush! This is one exciting and SOLID young future leader! No wonder ZOG in Finland wants to put him behind bars for 4.5 years.

Here is the audiofile of his remarks: Henrik is speaking from about 00:00 to 08:00. (Dr. Duke assured me that a DVD video of the whole EURO conference will be out in around one month. You can order it then at www.davidduke.com)

While in Washington, we were also visiting our friends at The Barnes Review magazine on Capitol Hill — where we were overjoyed to learn that the special TBR issue “Russia and the Jews” about Nobel Laureate Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s last book was selling red-hot. (You can order it for $8 here: http://www.barnesreview.org)

In fact, I took a slew of the latest TBR to the EURO conference and sold out every copy, autographing them on request. (I translated over 75% of the German summary of this Russian masterwork).

After all the conferences I have ever attended that Jewish extremists have tried to shut down (always failing to do so when I was around to help), I am now a veteran of how to persist, how to innovate, how to think on one’s feet, because as they rightly say in show business, “the show must go on!”

I won’t give the psychopathic freedom-hating minority among the Jews the pleasure of our capitulation!

So I told Margi that we simply MUST attend that Memphis, Tennessee conference, which now meant for us a NINE HUNDRED MILE DRIVE from Washington.

Caption: Here is Margi at the podium with Dr. Duke, and Stormfront broadcaster James Edwards, a charming Southern gentleman full of enthusiasm for our sacred Cause.

Listen to Margaret splendidly singing a Stephen Foster song, “Ah, May the Red Rose Live Alway” [sic],” from about 04:00 to 08:15, audiofile here.

I had heard, while making my decision to drive to Tennessee or not, that several major scheduled speakers had canceled, such as Willis Carto, Dr. Ed Fields, Sam Dickson, etc. Since David had previously asked me, Henrik and Margaret to speak or (in Margi’s case, to sing some marvelous white music), we felt that with the others having canceled, we really could render a service to this important gathering of our Folk if we drove that long stretch. (Of course, that also meant a 900-mile trip afterward back home to our new location north of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for a total of 1,800 miles.)

So off we went, and the drive was in fact gorgeous, through the Appalachian mountains of western Virginia and the entire length of Tennessee. It was a bit scary after 150 miles when we started getting smoke from the car’s engine compartment, but it turned out to be a minor problem with some fluid dripping on the catalytic converter. Of course we pressed on.

Parenthetically, since I am a gregarious person and always try to sound out the white public out everywhere I go, I found during the whole trip that most Southern whites (as well as Northern whites) are terrified of Obama and of the coming Great Depression that plutocrats among the Jews have caused. And very many have heard about Obama’s HUGE birth certificate problem. Three different men told me (and these were NOT WN’s) that they feared a race war started by black rioting if Obama were disqualified by the U.S. Supreme Court. Two at a Radio Shack told me they had just bought additional guns for their protection if the blacks rampaged — and I repeat that these were NOT WN’s, just John Q. White-Public.

The conference itself was as always a marvelous time to not only hear interesting speeches and performances, but also to network with the real activists, start new friendships and strengthen old bonds.

I met for the first time a fine young filmmaker there, a farmer/engineer, the wonderful Pastor Tom Robb and his family (all pitching in diligently, BTW, even on the food line as servers!). I enjoyed meeting the dry-witted Derek Black, who defeated a Jewish activist named Dinerstein [spelling?] and was elected a Republican committeeman in West Palm Beach, Fla., and the irrepressible, handsome and humorous Dane Knud Erickson. Masha, Duke’s winsome Russian lady friend, delivered a courageous address on the Bolshevik Jews and the suffering her people had endured at their hands. I was impressed by the whole Duke-Black-Stormfront team, which was busy as bees throughout in putting on yet another successful EURO event, and this time under heavy fire, and has earned the loyalty and admiration this team engenders.

Now the decision to reduce the conference from two days to one day must have been a difficult one for Dr. Duke.

In October 2007 I was assisting organizer Joe Fields (and co-organizer Mark Glenn) to save their “No More Wars for Israel” conference in southern California. Once again, Jewish radicals had succeeded in pressuring hotels to cancel or refuse us a meeting place. I was proud that, with the help of a Greek-American named Pete and a local activist Mishko (an intrepid Croatian-American and VNN activist), our team secured a Greek Orthodox church for the Saturday session and then a dance ballroom (any port in a storm!) for the Sunday session.

Caption: Joe Fields with me in Sarver, Pennsylvania. Joe, a Croatian-American, has been a fearless (and severely persecuted) white civil rights activist for decades, and co-organized the “No More Wars for Israel” conference along with anti-Zionist writer-activist Mark Glenn (who writes for American Free Press. Joe has now rejoined his lovely white South African wife Deirdre and his gorgeous blond kids, here in western Pennsylvania, after months untangling his late father’s estate in California. See here on my website Deirde’s outstanding article about the lessons of South Africa for America!

(The ballroom of course had no chairs, and being in an industrial park, it also had no food service nearby for the crowd. I quickly organized and carried out a chair-renting/hauling-by-pickup/setting-up operation, and brought in pizzas for all.)

A fine comrade on Stormfront wrote me about that rescue operation just yesterday:

“I remember how much of an asset you were to the “No More Wars For Israel” conference. When all seemed lost you kept your cool and helped make that a big success, I was recently listening to the broadcasts from that conference and was pleasantly shocked to find that one of them had racked up over 11,000 listens so far!”

Now our October 2007 conference “No More Wars for Israel” did succeed in having two all-day sessions, and those who had paid for a two-day conference got their money’s worth. Of course, the uncertainty about the conference location — and a false story which the treacherous Marriott hotel told the media claiming we had canceled — did dissuade many comrades from coming. Because of this, far, far fewer attendees than were planned for actually showed up and paid to get in.

So it became a money-loser for the “NMWF-Israel” organizers, Fields and Glenn, to stick to holding a two-day conference — renting two different halls for two days, plus chairs on Sunday – for a much-reduced crowd.

On the other hand, when you decide to hold just a one-day conference when two were promised and paid for by many attendees, you have other problems.

Some at the EURO conference were understandably grousing that they felt gipped, especially since the manager of the hotel had assured those attendees on Saturday that he would be happy to host a Sunday meeting for the Duke crowd as well.

Another problem is for the scheduled speakers, as exemplified by our Danish brother Knud Erickson: You work very hard and have a carefully-planned speech ready to deliver — and you have flown thousands of miles, through all the jet lag, to deliver it. Then the host tells you that instead of one hour (again, because of freedom-hating instigators among the Jewish community) you have just twenty minutes to hit on the “main points.”

This is not fun for a speaker who wants to really affect his audience.

(Nor is it fun when a speaker egotistically blabs on into the next speaker’s time, and is not reminded to wrap it up. This was also the dilemma at the American Free Press/Barnes Review conference in September 2006. All speakers subsequent to the first speaker were required by emcee Willis Carto to SLASH their carefully planned speeches down to a fraction of their planned lengths, and at the last minute to boot. I had the same dilemma — as one of the final speakers at “NMWF-Israel” Sunday evening in October 2007, and my entire speech (seen in three parts at my Youtube site http://www.youtube.com/johndenugent) had to be ruthlessly curtailed. You can actually see me shuffling through my photographs and exhibits as I was speaking, deciding what to cut and what to leave.)

And so the Duke-EURO conference had that same problem, speakers suddenly given a fraction of the time they had planned to carefully and artfully use. Dr. Duke had only given me ten minutes to begin with, which I stuck to (actually about 11 minutes), but with all the speakers who had canceled, I could easily have spoken for twenty minutes or thirty — and many told Margi they wished I had. Certainly in a two-day (or even a one-and-a-half day session) I could have brought up some key issues and not just introduced myself — especially in view of the 1,800-mile round trip by car.

I might add, on the other hand, that Pastor Tom Robb made a keen observation to me after it was all over. Duke wanted the conference to end on a winning note, Reverend Robb surmised, and by Duke wrapping it up on Saturday night we at least had that triumphant ending. However, had David promised a Sunday session, and then seen the hotel cancel on us for Sunday at the last minute despite its assurances, we WNs would have been left disappointed at the end — and would have left Memphis with our tail between our legs. Psychology and morale are important, and leaving on a high note. So there are many factors Dr. Duke had to consider, and likely some escape me as an outsider and a friend looking on from the outside.

In any case, my recommendation would be to always hold the meeting itself at a secret location, and it should be revealed only at a “staging area” (as comrade Jamie Kelso did in Memphis) — and we should perhaps have comrades just book their own rooms at nearby hotels from a recommended hotel list. Leftists do not usually harass a hotel for the guests sleeping there, but for the meetings being held there. (However, the Drury Inn, as I wrote above, did outrageously expel David Duke personally from his room, after he merely held a news conference outside that hotel.)

I have other recommendations, but I will not publish them here on this public website. In my 30 years in this Cause I have been through many meetings canceled through the pressure exerted by certain Jews and where we had to scramble. And we prevailed. Never surrender!

A conference is also about networking, making new friends and strengthening the old ties of comradery between us. It is also always fun to physically meet comrades one had known previously only by their screen name and “avatar,” or their email address. I met a budding young film maker, a combination farmer & engineer, and several website whizzes, plus the delightful, handsome and humorous Dane, Knud Erickson, not to mention the bevy of lovely and gifted ladies and girls, the flowers of our race, whom Margi and I both met.

I led a three-car tour of the city of Memphis after the one-day conference.

Myself and a young film maker, two “Damn Yankees” who revered the great Confederate general Nathan Bedford Forrest, whose striking equestrian statue is the glory of a park near downtown Memphis. Tragically, Forrest felt forced by anarchy to found and form the KKK to suppress black violence and a total black political takeover of the South after the unjust War of Federal Aggression (1861-65).

How ironic that his great-grandson, General Nathan Bedford Forrest III, a West Point graduate, was the first American general to die fighting Hitler’s Germany in WWII, shot down in 1943 while bombing Kiel. When Jewish supremacists egg on whites to kill each other, we need to see the Forrest for the trees. The statue is in the background.

This building faces Forrest Park, and helps explain why Whites keep dying in needless foreign wars.

This giant pyramid below dominates the northern end of Memphis, next to the mighty Mississippi river bridge from Memphis, Tennessee over into Arkansas. Since the city’s name Memphis is Egyptian, I guess this structure is innocent enough, but, looking at the back of the U.S. one-dollar bill, I wonder!

Henrik at a stand a quarter-mile from our house where you just leave the money in the box for a dozen ears of superb Pennsylvania sweet corn. We are now back in honest, nearly all-white western Pennsylvania. Butler County is a whopping 98% White. Western Pennsylvania is the epicenter of Solutréa.

Here I am completing a book that, I fervent believe, will change everything for our race, and around this work inspire, organize and structure the Solutreans — the white tribe that shall survive. In Harrison Hills Park, overlooking the mighty Allegheny River, north of Pittsburgh. Although we are, like myself in this photo, living in the shadow of our racial doom, we can and must cross over to the light. I am pleased to announce the release of the entire SIX-DVD set of the “No More Wars for Israel” conference, with many outstanding speeches, by a USS Liberty survivor, by two powerful black nationalists who both want whites to LEAD America, forget our fear, and “get on the stick,” by the now imprisoned Australian hero Dr. Fredrick Toeben, by the white Afrikaner Deirdre Fields (amazing information on the Rothschild web in Africa), by conference co-organizer Mark Glenn, by Arab-American leader Hesham Tillawi, by Canadian freedom-fighter Paul Fromm, by fiery Virginia essayist Patrick Grimm, and you have also my full remarks near the end of the conference. (At http://www.youtube.com/johndenugent they are truncated.) I would especially recommend, even aside from the lady being my fiancée, Margaret Huffstickler’s gutsy and persuasive speech on the most taboo man of all time. You will be stunned by the poem at the beginning.

To help both me and the valiant Fields family, send today your check for $75 (incl. S&H) for the unique six-DVD set to:

John de Nugent
213 Ekastown Road
Sarver, PA 16055

tel: (724) 524-1002.

 
You can hear the afternoon EURO speeches HERE, [or try here]

 
Article Source: Apocalypse of the Psychopaths

In my recent radio program with Knud Eriksen of Denmark we talked at length about the overwhelming role of the organized Jewish community in the promotion of the international Bolshevism and Russian revolution, as well as their prominent role in the greatest mass murders of all time, a role that Solzhenitsyn documented quite well.  The facts may be shocking for many who read this but their leading part in the tragedy of Communist murder and oppression is without any serious dispute, it is just covered up by the mainstream media of today. This article quotes many mainstream  sources such as the Winston Churchill, the American Ambassador to Russia, the American National Archives, British Intelligence documents and even the National Geographic Magazine from the period of the Russian Revolution. Read and learn!

MY AWAKENING

by David Duke

Chapter 15: The Jewish Question

In the last decade of the 20th century, to criticize the Jewish people, religion, or the nation of Israel is considered the worst of moral crimes. Jews are the most sacred of sacred cows, and anyone with a negative word about them finds himself labeled an “anti-Semite.” Once a man acquires that label, true or not, nothing can redeem him from what the mass media views as the ultimate sin. So, irredeemable as I am – I have the freedom to write and speak openly about an issue that few dare to broach. I am not an anti-Semite and I reject that epithet. However, I must address what Henry Ford called the “world’s foremost problem,”[1] a problem now critical to our people’s survival and freedom.It is almost impossible in our Holocaust-saturated world to even say the word “Jew” without arousing emotion. The mass media of the Western world have made that so with their unrelenting packaging and repackaging of the “Holocaust.” As the respected British historian David Irving says, “It’s spelled ‘Holocaust’ with a capital ‘H’ – trademark applied for.” [2] The Holocaust has gone from being a sidebar of the Second World War to the point where the war has become a historical footnote to the Holocaust. During the one year before this book’s publication, which is well over 50 years after the end of the war, my local (actually “local” is a misnomer, for New Yorkers own it) daily newspaper, The Times-Picayune, had dozens of news and feature articles exploring varying aspects of the Holocaust. In that year, the same paper had barely mentioned the Soviet Gulags where between 20 and 40 million people died, and had only one story that mentioned the Cambodian murder of three million. Not a single article appeared on the slaughter of 30 to 40 million in Red China. Looking through old newspaper microfiches, I discovered that during the late 1990s there are at least 10 times more news articles on the Holocaust than there were in the late 1940s or 1950s. Rarely does an event become more talked and written about as time passes further from it. For instance, the subject of the Second World War took up a far greater proportion of movies, TV programs, documentaries, books and magazine articles in the late 1950s than in the late 1990s. Not so for the Holocaust: the further we seem to get away from the event, the more it bludgeons us.

It would be a Herculean task to even count all the Holocaust-oriented television news stories and specials, the documentaries and “docudramas”, the books (both fiction and nonfiction), the magazine articles, movies and plays. Tales of Holocaust victims, relatives, survivors, war crimes, criminals, reparations, Holocaust-related art and literature, remembrances and memorials bombard us almost daily. A multimillion-dollar Holocaust museum stands in Washington, D.C. It is right on the most sacred soil in the American Pantheon, the Mall near the Smithsonian Institution, financed in no small part by our tax dollars. Interestingly, it was built long before there was any real effort to build a memorial to the Second World War. It is a massive, modern version of the Chamber of Horrors at Madame Tussaud’s Wax Museum.

The Holocaust is not the only Jewish trauma of which we all must grieve, for we see many painful historical accounts and dramatic Hollywood productions about other historical persecutions of the Jews. Jews are victimized by Arab terrorists in the Mideast, by fascists in Europe, and even by Klansmen in the United States. There is a virtually inexhaustible supply of books, articles, movies and plays about individual Jews who have suffered from evil anti-Semites.

Each year, tens of thousands of stories about intelligent, compassionate, unselfish, creative, moral and courageous Jews fill two-foot TV screens and 30-foot movie screens; our newspapers, magazines, and books; our playhouses, pulpits and podiums; our radio waves and satellite transmissions. There are thousands of portrayals of persecuted Jews as innocent, noble and heroic; while their opponents are portrayed as the embodiment of evil. No group on Earth has better public relations than do the Jewish people.

Whether it is Pharaoh’s army with swords unsheathed, chasing the Hebrews or the Czar with his anti-Semitic Cossacks, Hitler with his SS minions dressed in black, an unnamed Palestinian terrorist trying to kidnap Israeli schoolchildren, or the more intimate story of a sensitive Jew mistreated by an anti-Semitic businessman – we have all seen the anti-Semitic stereotype, seen the skeletal bodies, and we have all shared the Jewish pain. I know of this firsthand, for it was true for me as a young man.

At age 12, reading Anne Frank: Diary of a Young Girl in the school library, I recoiled from the inhumanity of anti-Semitism. By the time I had finished the book, I felt as if I had lost members of my own family. With my shirtsleeves, I covertly wiped away the moisture that had welled up in my eyes.

Only a few times did I have any discussion with my father about Jews, about whom he had only praise. He spoke about my great uncle Nathan, a Methodist minister who had converted from the Jewish faith and married my grandfather’s sister, my great aunt Gussie. Father had enormous respect for Nathan and carried it over to the rest of the people he called the “Hebrews,” thinking that his term carried more dignity than the word “Jews.” At various times he described the “Hebrews” as hardworking, smart, thrifty, and accomplished. “Thrifty” was an accolade that made a distinct impression on me, because I knew that Father looked upon that particular trait as one of the most important. He hated waste of any kind. I learned that lesson at the dinner table a hundred times, having to eat every bite of my food before being excused. I thought thriftiness was as Scottish as the Duke family, but hearing that it was Jewish, impressed me.

Recitals of the Holocaust and Bible stories formed my primary impressions of the Jewish people. Cecil B. DeMille’s movie classics, as typified by The Ten Commandments, led me to identify contemporary Jews with the heroic “Israelites” of the Old Testament. I formed a deep admiration for the “Chosen People.”

How, then, did I go from my early fawning opinion of the Jews to being eventually described as a dangerous “anti-Semite” by the powerful Jewish advocacy organization: the ADL (the oddly-named Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith)? No Jew had ever wronged me; I wasn’t taught anti-Semitism by my parents or friends, nor did I blame them for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Although I categorically reject being labeled anti-Semitic, I certainly believe that – as any other people – Jews deserve praise for their accomplishments and, conversely, they should not be immune from criticism for their failings. The only problem is that in post-World War II, Holocaust-saturated America, any criticism of Jews as a group is viewed as the moral equivalent of condoning mass murder.

If one criticizes any part of Jewish history or conduct, of intolerant aspects of their religion, or even Israel’s Zionist policies, he inevitably acquires the label “anti-Semitic,” a term that could not be more damaging or prejudicial. If one speaks, however, about the routine mistreatment of Indians in American history, he is not described as “anti-American.” Those who express horror about the excesses of the Spanish Inquisition are not labeled “anti-Christian” or “anti-Spanish.”

The same media that prohibits even the slightest criticism of Jews has no reluctance to demean other groups. White Southerners, Germans and Evangelical Christians – these groups get more than their share of ridicule and debasement. The portrayal of the slack-jawed, green-toothed, ignorant, racist, hateful, murderous, rural White Southerner has become a stereotype in Hollywood films. One of the best-selling books of the late 1990s is the media-promoted Hitler’s Willing Executioners,1 a book that says the German people have something evil within them, something that makes them all guilty for the atrocities of the Holocaust. In stark contrast, whenever Jews are mentioned as a group, it is always with a sort of a hushed reverence. What is it about the Jewish people that evokes such unrestrained adulation and visceral hatred?

Once I became convinced that race was important and that people of European descent needed to protect their heritage and culture, I became a young member of the Citizens Council. Often, after class and on rainy summer days, I would go down to the office on Carondolet Street in New Orleans to do volunteer work.

Many fascinating publications streamed into the office from hundreds of right-wing groups all over America. One day, when I finished helping with a Council mailing, I came across some tabloid newspapers called Common Sense. It was a conservative, right-wing paper modeled after Thomas Paine’s classic broadside; only the message was sharply different from Paine’s. “JEWISH-LED NAACP PART OF COMMUNIST PLAN FOR AMERICA!” read one issue’s headline. “COMMUNISM IS JEWISH!” trumpeted another. I also found some old issues. The huge headline in one of them predicted, “RED DICTATORSHIP BY 1954!” However, such a warning did not lend much credibility to the paper when looked at in 1965! I found the National Enquirer-type headlines ludicrous, but it was hard to resist reading something that scandalous, even if just to laugh at it.

The Sharp Words of Mattie Smith

One of the regular volunteers, Mattie Smith, an elderly lady in a flower-print dress and outlandish hat, saw me snickering at the lurid headlines and simply said, “You know, it’s true.”

“Red Dictatorship by 1954?” I replied with a smile.

“No,” she said, “Communism is Jewish. They are the ones behind it.”

I thought I would humor the little old lady by politely arguing a bit with her. “Ma’am. How could that be?” I asked. “Communists are atheists; they don’t believe in God. Jews believe in God, so how could they be Communists?”

“Do you know who Herbert Aptheker is?” she said, answering my question with one of her own.

“No,” I replied, affecting nonchalance.

She was like a tightly coiled spring waiting for release. “He has the official role of chief theoretician of the Communist Party, USA, and he’s listed in the Who’s Who in World Jewry.1 Leon Trotsky, the Communist who took over Russia with Lenin, was in Who’s Who in American Jewry.2 His real name is Lev Bronstein. Both are atheist Communists, and both are proudly listed as great Jews in these books published by the largest Jewish organizations in the world.”

Meekly, I offered, “Maybe they were listed because they were once Jews.”

“You have so much to learn,” she said with a sigh. “Under Israel’s Law of Return, you can be an atheist Communist and still immigrate to Israel. There are plenty of them too. You only qualify to immigrate if you are a Jew, and a Jew is described simply as being of Jewish descent. So, you see, you can be Jewish and still be an atheist and still be a Communist – and I tell you, Communism is Jewish!”

“All Jews are Communists?” I retorted sarcastically.

“No, no, no,” she emphatically replied, with much patience in the way she paced her words. “All Jews are not Communists, any more than all snakes are poisonous. But most leading Communists in America are Jews, as well as most of the convicted Russian spies in America, as well as the leaders of the New Left. And historically, most of the Commie revolutionaries in Russia were Jewish as well!”

What Mrs. Smith said made me very uncomfortable. Although it was not yet time to leave, I claimed that I had to catch my bus back home. I left the office hurriedly. Mrs. Smith had to be wrong, but I just didn’t have the facts to challenge her statements. I resolved to research the issue so that I could show her why she was wrong. Something else bothered me as well, for I felt a little guilty for even talking with someone who said such things about Jews. I was staunchly anti-Communist, and to suggest that Jews were behind the horrors of Communism was, to me, such a terrible allegation that my heart told me that it just could not be true. It was the first time I had been face to face with a person I presumed was an anti-Semite. I was soon running to catch my streetcar.

During the next couple of days I avoided even thinking about the issue, and I stayed away from the Citizens Council office. Finally I picked up and read the two copies of Common Sense I had taken home. One copy maintained that the NAACP was a Communist front organization dedicated to the eventual overthrow of our way of life. It purported that 12 Jews and one Black had founded the NAACP, and all the founders were dedicated Marxists with decades of documented Communist affiliations. The article asserted that the only major Black founder of the NAACP, W. E. B. Dubois, was an avowed member of the Communist Party who immigrated to Communist Ghana (where he eventually was buried). Furthermore, the scandalous publication purported that the NAACP was financed by Jewish money and always had a Jewish president. It said that a Jew, Kivie Kaplan, was the current NAACP president and that he was the real leader of the organization rather than its Black “front man,” Roy Wilkins. Although the public perceived Wilkins as the NAACP leader, the paper asserted that he actually had the lower rank of national secretary.

The other copy of Common Sense was no less startling. It had a long article asserting that international Communism was a Jewish creation and that the Russian Revolution had not really been Russian at all. Jews had supposedly financed and led Communism since its inception, and that they thoroughly dominated the Communist movement in the United States.

This Enquirer of the right, quoted many names, dates, and sources to support its incredible allegations. I was very skeptical of its assertions, but the information was too compelling to ignore. For I had learned early on in my racial investigations not to so easily dismiss unpopular opinions.

Despite their seemingly strong documentation, the articles just seemed too bizarre to be true. How could it be that the largest and most powerful Black organization in America was founded, financed, and run by Jews, and Marxist Jews at that – instead of Blacks? How could something so incredible be kept so quiet that most people would not know about it? If the Russian Revolution was truly a revolution led by Jews rather than Marxist Russians, how could such an enormous historical fact be ignored in our history books and in our popular media? Furthermore, I could not understand why wealthy and powerful Jews would foster race-mixing and Communism.

Father had often talked to me about the evils of Communism, and I had been thoroughly anti-Communist since reading books such as The Conscience of a Conservative1 by Barry Goldwater, None Dare Call It Treason2 by John A. Stormer, and You Can Trust the Communists (To Be Communists)3 by Frederick Charles Schwarz. These books and others impressed upon me the penetration of Communist ideology in our society, media, and government.

The Cuban Missile Crisis had occurred just three years before, and Father’s plans to build a fallout shelter were still fresh in my mind. He had even purchased food and other survival supplies for it. During that period, the idea of nuclear war went from an abstract idea to the realism of actually preparing for it. In the early ’60s, most communities tested the working order of air-raid sirens by sounding them daily at noon. Sometimes, when we lost track of time in school and the noon air-raid sirens went off, we wondered for a moment if the war was actually upon us.

During the Cuban crisis, most adults rationalized that thermonuclear war would not happen because it must not happen – because the very thought was too monstrous to contemplate. An 11-year-old is much more prone to believe that someone might pull the switch. Years later, the world discovered that we had actually teetered much closer to nuclear war than most Americans knew at the time. The fact that Communists had put my family in real danger of nuclear incineration contributed greatly to my visceral anti-Communist stance.

One of the Common Sense issues mentioned a full-page newspaper article written by Winston Churchill called “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.” The article had originally appeared in the Illustrated Sunday Herald on February 8, 1920. Churchill had maintained that the world’s Jews were being torn between an allegiance to Communism on the one hand and Zionism on the other. Churchill hoped the Jews would adopt Zionism as an alternative to what he called “diabolical” and “sinister” Bolshevism. In his well-written article, contemporary with the early years of the Russian Revolution, Churchill described Communism as a “sinister confederacy” of “International Jews” who “have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of this enormous empire.”1

The article shocked me enough that I had to check its authenticity. It turned out to be genuine. In fact, I found some Jewish references to it bewailing the fact that Churchill’s article gave fodder to the anti-Semites of the world. The following is an excerpt from his amazing article.

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where the Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing…and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews…2

As an important historical figure as Churchill was, he was still only one voice. I rationalized that he could be wrong about the nature of the Russian Revolution. One of the Common Sense articles I read referred to a series of explosive documents (complete with file numbers) from the National Archives of the United States. I wrote to my local Congressman, F. Edward Hebert, and asked if his office could obtain copies of the files for me. A couple of weeks later, on returning home from school, I found waiting for me a large manila envelope from the Congressman.

Certified by the seal of the United States of America, the documents were from the National Archives. They concerned intelligence reports from foreign governments and extensive reports from our chief intelligence officers in Russia during the time of the Russian Civil War in the early days of the Communist revolution. The early 1920s were long before the establishment of the OSS and the CIA. The U.S. Army ran our international intelligence work at that time. One of our military intelligence officers in Russia during its revolutionary period was Captain Montgomery Schuyler. He sent back regular reports to the chief of staff of U.S. Army Intelligence, who then relayed them to the Secretary of War and the President of the United States.

“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews…”
Winston S. Churchill

Reading through the lengthy reports gave me a glimpse into a historical period of which few Americans are aware. They reported horrible massacres of thousands of Russian aristocrats and intelligentsia, murdered simply because they could provide effective leadership in opposition to the Communists. Many Americans are at least somewhat aware of Stalin’s murder of over 20 million. However, many millions also died in the early days of Bolshevism under Lenin and Trotsky, for it was these men who initiated the first mass killings and the gulags.

The reports also stated, without equivocation, the Jewish nature of the revolution. In one of Schuyler’s official reports, declassified in 1958, almost 50 years after he wrote and dispatched them, he states:1

It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States, but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type…

— Captain Schuyler, American army intelligence officer in Russia during the revolution. (in his official report)

In quoting the graphic language of this official report, my intention is not to offend; but Schuyler’s report says what it says, whether we like it or not. In another report, written four months later, Captain Schuyler goes on to quote the evidence of Robert Wilton, who was then the chief Russian correspondent of the authoritative . Wilton later went on to pen a number of best-selling books on the revolution, including the widely acclaimed Russia’s Agony and Last Days of the Romanovs.2 On June 9, 1919, Schuyler cites Wilton as follows:

A table made up in 1918, by Robert Wilton, corespondent of the London Times in Russia, shows at that time there were 384 commissars including 2 Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number 264 had come from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial Government.3

There was, of course, no reason to impugn the reporting of the Times or of Captain Schuyler. I couldn’t believe my eyes as I scanned the papers dispersed across the plastic tablecloth on my dining-room table. I wondered how it could possibly be true that the “Russian Revolution” had only 13 ethnic Russians out of the 384 members of its top governing body. Churchill’s description of “gripping the Russian people by the hair of their heads” came to life in the pages I received from our own National Archives.

Once I started checking out the leads I would glean from my reading, the National Archives kept spitting out the most incredible documents. Not only did our chief intelligence officer write to the president of the United States about the Jewish nature of Communism, so did our U.S. ambassador to Russia, David R. Francis. In a January 1918 cable to our government, he reported:

The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.

- David Francis, American Ambassador to Russia at the time of the Revolution1

The National Archives also sent me copies from its files of Communications from Scotland Yard and British Intelligence. The directorate of British Intelligence sent to America and other nations a lengthy report dated July 16, 1919, on Bolshevism abroad. It was called “A Monthly Review of the Progress of Revolutionary Movements Abroad.” This lengthy report lists the Communist movements in the major nations of the world. The first sentence in the first paragraph on the first page of this British government report claims that Jews control international Communism.2

Years later, as a student at Louisiana State University, I took a course entirely devoted to the Russian Revolution. Neither my professor in his lectures, nor my textbook (The Soviet Achievement)3 made any mention of the Jewish-Russian conflict and the Jewish domination of the Communist Party.

The Jewish role in the Communist revolution was, however, mentioned in many major Jewish publications such as the Jewish Encyclopedia and the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. It astounded me to find them actually boasting about the pivotal role of Jews in the Russian Revolution. They even pointed out the effort of the Communist Jews to disguise the Jewish role – a successful effort – for most Gentiles in America and Europe are still unaware of it.

“There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international movement controlled by Jews.”

- The Director of British Intelligence to the U.S. Secretary of State

The Communist movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life, particularly in the 1920s, 1930s and during and after World War II…. Individual Jews played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet Regime…. The great attraction of Communism among Russian, and later also, Western Jewry, emerged only with the establishment of the Soviet Regime in Russia…

Many Jews the world over therefore regarded the Soviet concept of the solution to the “Jewish question” as an intrinsically positive approach…. Communism became widespread in virtually all Jewish communities. In some countries Jews became the leading element in the legal and illegal Communist parties and in some cases were even instructed by the Communist international to change their Jewish-sounding names and pose as non-Jews, in order not to confirm right wing propaganda that presented Communism an alien, Jewish conspiracy.1

Trotsky’s book, Stalin, written in exile, attempted to show that Stalin had played only an insignificant role in the early days of the Communist takeover. Trotsky attempted to illustrate this point by reproducing a postcard widely circulated in the months following the revolution. The postcard depicted the six leaders of the revolution. Shown are Lenin (who was at least one-quarter Jewish, spoke Yiddish in his home, and was married to a Jewess), Trotsky (real Jewish name: Lev Bronstein), Zinoviev (real Jewish name: Hirsch Apfelbaum), Lunacharsky (a Gentile), Kamenov (real Jewish name: Rosenfeld), and Sverdlov (Jewish).2 Not only does the postcard show the Jewish domination of the revolution; it also illustrates the fact the Jewish Communist leaders shown had changed their names just as reported in the Encyclopedia Judaica.

Although the fact of Lenin’s Jewish ancestry was kept quiet for many years, Jewish writers are now taking note of it. David Shub, author of Lenin: A Biography, stated in a letter to the Russian émigré paper Novyi Zhurnal3 that Lenin’s mother was at least Jewish on her father’s side and probably so on her mother’s side as well.4

In addition, a French Jewish periodical, Review de Fonds Social Juif,5 reported that a Soviet novelist, Marietta Shaguinian, was prevented by Soviet censorship from publishing evidence of Lenin’s Jewish ancestry. A number of Jewish publications in recent years have disclosed Lenin’s Jewish heritage, including the Jewish Chronicle.6

The Cheka, or secret police, had a Jew, Moses Uritzky, as its first chief, and most of the other subsequent leaders were also Jews, including Sverdlov and Genrikh Yagoda (which is Russian for “Yehuda” – “the Jew”) who presided over the pogroms that killed tens of millions. The Soviet propaganda minister during the war was a Jew, Ilya Ehrenburg, who notoriously distinguished himself by his Second World War exhortations of Soviet troops to rape and murder the women and children of Germany.7 Anatol Goldberg quoted Ehrenburg in his book, Ilya Ehrenburg as saying, “…the Germans are not human beings…nothing gives us so much joy as German corpses.”8

The Communist secret police, which underwent many name changes, including Cheka, OGPU, GPU, NKVD, NKGB, MGB, and KGB, was the most feared police agency in the history of the world, having imprisoned, tortured, or murdered more than 40 million Russians and Eastern Europeans. Even the more conservative Soviet historians of the 1960s were placing the number of murdered at about 35 to 40 million – figures that do not include the millions more who were dispossessed, imprisoned, exiled, tortured, and displaced. Nobel Prizewinner Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in his opus, The Gulag Archipelago, using the research of a Soviet statistician who had access to secret government files, I. A. Kurganov, estimated that between 1918 and 1959, at least36 million died at the hands of the Communist rulers of Russia. In Gulag Archipelago II, Solzhenitsyn affirms that Jews created and administered the organized Soviet concentration-camp system in which tens of millions died. Pictured on page 79 of the Gulag Archipelago II are the leading administrators of the greatest killing machine in the history of the world.1 They are Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh Yagoda, and Naftaly Frenkel. All six are Jews.

Interestingly, though, during this period of murder and mayhem, Jews were a protected class, so much so that the Communist Party took the unprecedented step of making expressions of anti-Semitism a counter-revolutionary offense, and thus punishable by death.2

The Jewish Voice in January, 1942, stated: “The Jewish people will never forget that the Soviet Union was the first country — and as yet the only country in the world — in which anti-Semitism is a crime.”3 The Congress Bulletin (Publication of the American Jewish Congress) stated:4 5 6

Anti-Semitism was classed as counter-revolution and the severe punishments meted out for acts of anti-Semitism were the means by which the existing order protected its own safety.

The Russian Penal Codes of 1922 and 1927 even went so far as to make anti-Semitism punishable by death. The book Soviet Russia and the Jews by Gregor Aronson and published by the American Jewish League Against Communism (1949 NY) quotes Stalin remarking on the policy in an interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency:

…Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the Soviet Union. Active Anti-Semites are punished by death under law. 7

The Beginning of an Ethnic War

In school, I brought these fascinating facts up with some of my teachers. They in turn were as incredulous as I had been. One suggested that the Jewish involvement in the Communist revolution might have been a result of the long-running historical persecution of Jews by the Czars and, indeed, by much of the Russian intelligentsia. For instance, Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, and many other prominent Russian writers had criticized Jewish machinations in their books and articles. Russians didn’t like it that the Jews used the Russian language for doing business among Gentiles but spoke Yiddish among themselves. Jews were also accused of having an “us versus them” mentality rather than assimilating with the Christian majority.

There had been a running feud between the Russians and the Jews for centuries, and from these conflicts arose “pogroms” to suppress the Jews. This war without borders can be illustrated by the Jewish reaction in the 1880s to the anti-Semitic Russian May Laws. The May Laws of 1882 attempted to restrict Jews from some professions and mandate resettlement of most Jews to their original area of the empire, the Pale of Settlement (a huge area, originally set up in 1772, encompassing an area about half the size of Western Europe, extending from the Crimea to the Baltic Sea, to which the Jews had been restricted).

In retaliation, Jewish international financiers did their best to destroy the Russian economy. Encyclopaedia Britannica describes the happenings this way:

The Russian May Laws were the most conspicuous legislative monument achieved by modern anti-Semitism…. Their immediate result was a ruinous commercial depression which was felt all over the empire and which profoundly affected the national credit. The Russian minister was at his wits end for money. Negotiations for a large loan were entered upon with the house of Rothschild and a preliminary contract was signed, when…the finance minister was informed that unless the persecutions of the Jews were stopped the great banking house would be compelled to withdraw from the operation….1

In response to the economic and other pressures put upon Russia, the Czar issued an edict on September 3, 1882. In it he stated:

For some time the government has given its attention to the Jews and to their relations to the rest of the inhabitants of the empire, with a view of ascertaining the sad condition of the Christian inhabitants brought about by the conduct of Jews in business matters….

With few exceptions, they have as a body devoted their attention, not to enriching or benefiting the country, but to defrauding by their wiles its inhabitants, and particularly its poor inhabitants. This conduct of theirs has called forth protests on the part of the people,… thought it a matter of urgency and justice to adopt stringent measures in order to put an end to the oppression practiced by the Jews on the inhabitants, and to free the country from their malpractices, which were, as is known, the cause of the agitations.2

So, Jews had ample reason to attempt to overturn the Czarist government of Russia, and there is direct evidence they did just that. The Jewish Communal Register of New York City of 1917-1918, edited and published by the Jewish community, profiles Jacob Schiff, who at that time was one of the wealthiest men in the world as head of the huge banking house of Kuhn, Loeb & Company. In the article it states how the firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Company “floated the large Japanese War Loans of 1904-1905, thus making possible the Japanese victory over Russia.” It also goes on to say,

Mr. Schiff has always used his wealth and his influence in the best interests of his people. He financed the enemies of autocratic Russia and used his financial influence to keep Russia away from the money market of the United States.1

Jacob Schiff actually gave somewhere between $17 million and $24 million to finance the Jewish-Communist revolutionaries in Russia, a sum that would be the equivalent of many hundreds of millions of dollars by today’s value. Rabbi Marvin S. Andelman, in his book To Eliminate the Opiate, cites two sources documenting Schiff’s financial support of the Communist revolution and ultimate repayment by them.

Jacob Schiff and Leon Trotsky, two key players in the Russian Revolution, both found their base of support in New York City.

Jacob Schiff is credited with giving twenty million dollars to the Bolshevik revolution. A year after his death the Bolsheviks deposited over six hundred million rubles to Schiff’s banking firm Kuhn & Loeb.2 3

It was initially puzzling that the violently anticapitalist Communist Party would be supported by some of the most prominent capitalists in the world. But I finally realized that Russian Revolution was not ultimately about the triumph of an economic ideology, it was about the settling of an age-old struggle between two powerful peoples – the Jews and the Russians – in an ethnic war that tragically ended in the totalitarian tyranny of the Communist dictatorship. Even worse, the score was ultimately settled in the terror of the blood-washed cellars of the Cheka and the frozen death of the Gulags.

The fact that super-capitalists such as Jacob Schiff could support a nakedly socialist regime such as Communism made me question whether there was something more to Communism than met the eye. What was it about Communism that made it so attractive to Jews, who were largely well-educated non-proletarians, when Communism was supposed to be, in Lenin’s words, “a dictatorship of the proletariat”? Obviously, by-and-large, Jews were nothing like Marx’s “workers of the world,” for no group was more involved in capitalism or the manipulation and use of capital than the Jewish community.

I checked out the Communist personalities that Mattie Smith told me were in the Jewish Who’s Who. Atheist Leon Trotsky as well as atheist Maxim Litvinov, the Soviet Minister of Foreign Affairs, are proudly listed in the directory of famous Jews compiled by the leading Jewish rabbinical groups of the world.

Winston Churchill, in his eloquent article “Zionism Versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People,” had argued that Communism and Zionism were distinct ideologies that were competing, as he put it, “for the soul of the Jewish people.” But something didn’t seem quite kosher in this supposed titanic struggle, for it appeared that many Zionists also supported Communism and, at least in the early years, many Communists were sympathetic to Zionists. Millions of Jews, even super-capitalists such as Jacob Schiff, supported the Communist revolution in Russia. The struggle seemed to be like that of two brothers who might sometimes argue amongst themselves but who always stand together against their common enemies.

In 1975, I read a book called Trotsky and the Jews, written by Joseph Nedava and published by the Jewish Publication Society (Philadelphia, 1971). The book points out that before the Russian Revolution, Leon Trotsky (born Lev Bronstein) used to play chess with Baron Rothschild of the famous Rothschild banking family.

A Jewish journalist (M. Waldman) who knew Trotsky from the period of his stay in Vienna (“when he used to play chess with Baron Rothschild in Cafe Central and frequent Cafe Daily to read the press there”).1

What could the Rothschilds, the biggest banking house in Europe, possibly have in common with a leader who wanted to destroy capitalism and private property? Conversely, why would a dedicated Communist be a close friend of the most powerful “capitalist oppressor” in the world? Could it be that they saw Communism and Zionism as two very different avenues to a similar goal of power and revenge against the Czars?

A number of questions arose: 1) Could Communism simply have been a tool they adapted to defeat and rule their Russian antagonists? 2) Were there other peoples with whom the Jews believed they were in conflict? 3) Was Communism originally part of a strategic imperative that reached far beyond the confines of Soviet Russia? These were important questions. I thought that I might find their answers in the philosophical origins of Communism.

I resolved to investigate the ideological roots of Communism. I found Das Kapital2 and the Communist Manifesto,3 in my public library. Karl Marx’s books were obtuse, especially the parts developing the Hegelian dialectic, but they made some sense if one believed mankind had a machine-like nature that Marx described. One of my teachers made the poorly thought out comment that Communism was great in theory but faulty in practice. To my way of thinking, to be a great idea it must work in practice, and Communism obviously doesn’t. There has never been a theory that has promised more human happiness yet delivered more poverty, mental and physical oppression, and more human misery and death.

Until I looked into the foundations of Communism, I had always thought Karl Marx was a German. In fact, I had read that Marx’s father was a Christian. It turns out that his father, a successful lawyer, was a Jew who had converted to Christianity after an edict prohibited Jews from practicing law. Much later, in 1977, I read an article from the Chicago Jewish Sentinel that revealed Marx as the grandson of a rabbi and “the descendant of Talmudic scholars for many generations.”4

Not only was Karl Marx from a long line of Talmudic scholars, he also hated Russians with a passion that could be described as pathological. I looked up Karl Marx in the Jewish encyclopedias, and I found to my amazement that the man who taught him many of the principles of Communism was Moses Hess. As incredible as it might seem, contemporary Zionist leaders venerate Moses Hess as the “forerunner” of modern Zionism.

In The Encyclopedia of Zionism in Israel, under the entry for Moses Hess, is found the following:

Pioneer of modern socialism, social philosopher, and forerunner of Zionism…. Hess was thus a forerunner of political and cultural Zionism and of socialist Zionism in particular. He became deeply involved in the rising socialist movement. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels acknowledged that they had learned much from him during the formative years of the movement….

- The Encyclopedia of Zionism in Israel1

After months of reading from every conceivable source, I realized that the elderly lady in the offices of the Citizens Council had been essentially right, at least about the origins of the Communist revolution. I felt as if I were sitting on the edge of a volcano. Every new piece of information seemed to both confirm and clarify the issue even more.

In The Last Days of the Romanovs, Robert Wilton, on assignment for The London Times in Russia for 17 years, summed up the “Russian Revolution” in these words:

The whole record of the Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov and carried out by the Jews Goloshekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov, and Yurvsky, is the act, not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.2

In 1990 a major New York publisher, the Free Press, a division of Simon & Schuster, published a book by Israeli historian Louis Rapoport called Stalin’s War Against the Jews. In it the author casually admits what we Gentiles are not supposed to know:

Many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the new government. Lenin’s first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish origins…

Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution, including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists’ vows to eradicate anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the revolution – partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Soviet secret police, the Cheka…. And many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.

The Collective leadership that emerged in Lenin’s dying days was headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, curly-haired…3

The once widespread knowledge of the Jewish leadership of the “Russian Revolution” has disappeared from our common knowledge – an example can be found in the National Geographic Magazine’s May 1907 edition. An article entitled “The Revolution in Russia” de-scribes the Jewish leadership of the terroristic Communist revolution.

THE VENGEANCE OF THE JEWS

…the revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race and the most effective revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund,…The government has suffered more from that race than from all of its other subjects combined. Whenever a desperate deed is committed it is always done by a Jew and there is scarcely one loyal member of that race in the entire Empire.1

The facts were indisputable. An enormous fact of history has been wiped away from the intellectual consciousness of the West as thoroughly as a file can be erased from the hard disk of a desktop computer. In his classic novel 1984,2 George Orwell wrote about historical truth “going down the Memory Hole”; such had been the fate of the truth regarding the real perpetrators of the “Russian Revolution.”

I asked myself two questions: “Why was the historical truth about the Communist revolution suppressed?” and “How, in a free world, could that suppression have been accomplished?” The first question had an obvious answer in the fact that the forces of international Jewry would not want it generally known that they were the primary authors of the most repressive and murderous evil in the history of mankind: Communism. Obviously, knowledge of that fact does not create good public relations for Jews.

The answer to the second question of “how” was more elusive. I realized that only very powerful forces could suppress important parts of the historical record and create a false impression of a “Russian Revolution” when there were only 13 ethnic Russians in the first Bolshevik government. Obviously the Jews historically did have a lot of power – as evidenced by Jacob Schiff, the Rothschilds, and others – but the power to change the perception of history – that seemed preposterous. Yet only a few months before, when Mattie Smith had told me at the Citizens Council that the Russian Revolution was Jewish, I had thought the idea was ridiculous. Now, I knew differently, and I knew I was just beginning to discover a new reality in the world.

The facts I then knew led to interesting new questions:

• Does it make me an anti-Semite to accept the historical fact that the “Rus-sian Revolution” was not actually Russian but a takeover of Czarist Rus-sia by an antagonistic, non-Russian nationality?
• Is there a historical nationalism among the Jews that is hostile toward other peoples?
• Do Jewish interests and the interests of the Christian West synchronize or conflict?
• If those interests sometimes conflict, did the well-coordinated, worldwide Jewish effort to fiercely fight for their perceived ethnic interests in Russia have implications for Western Europe and America?
• How did their organized power create our “special relationship” with Is-rael in modern times?
• And, finally: Did asking these questions have anything to do with “hate”?

When I saw programs on television about anti-Semitism, hate was the word almost always used to describe any negative opinion about Jews. I felt no hatred toward Jews. My investigation had been purely an intellectual exercise. I was an interloper looking into a world where I did not belong, but it was a world that intrigued me. Pondering the “hate” question, I asked a teacher at school why the word hate wasn’t ever used by the media to describe the motivation of the mass murder of millions of Russian Christians in the Soviet Union. Certainly, it would have taken a great deal of hate to have committed such monstrous crimes. She had no answer and all I had were a lot more questions.

Once I discovered the shared roots of both Communism and Zionism, I decided to examine the history of the Jewish people, both historical Judaism and the development of modern Zionism. I felt that I had access to the best sources in the world for my investigation. I started with three excellent and exhaustive Jewish encyclopedias.

Table of Contents of My Awakening (1998 Edition –2008 Edition has added chapters and updates)

[1]  Ford, Henry, (1920-1922). The International Jew: the World’s Foremost Problem. Dearborn Independent. Dearborn, Michigan.
[2]  Irving, David. (1994). Action Report. Special Edition.
[3] Jick Leon A. (1981). The Holocaust: its Use and Abuse within the American  Public. Yad Vashem Studies, XIV, p.316. Jerusalem
[4]  Goldhagen, D. (1996). Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Knopf, Random House.
[5]  Who’s Who in World Jewry. (1965). New York : Pitman Publishing. Corp.
[6]  Who’s Who in American Jewry. (1927-). New York : The Jewish Biographical Bureau, Inc.
[7]  Goldwater, B. M. (1960). The Conscience of a Conservative. Shepherdsville, Kentucky: Victor Publishing Co.
[8]  Stormer, J. (1964).  None Dare Call It Treason. Florissant, Missouri: Liberty Bell Press.
[9]  Schwarz, F. C. (1960).  You Can Trust the Communists. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
[10]  Churchill, W. (1920). Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People. Illustrated Sunday Herald. February 8.
[11] Ibid.
[12] U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American Expeditionary Forces, June 9.
[13] Wilton, R. (1920). Last Days of the Romanovs. New York: George H. Doran Co. p.148.
[14]  U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American Expeditionary Forces, June 9.
[15]  Francis, D. R. (1921). Russia From the American Embassy. New York: C. Scribner’s & Sons. p.214.
[16]  National Archives, Dept. of State Decimal File, 1910-1929, file 861.00/5067
[17]  Nettl, J. P. (1967). The Soviet Achievement. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
[18]  Encyclopedia Judaica. p.791-792.
[19] Trotsky, L. (1968). Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and His Influence. ed. trans. Charles Malamuth. London, MacGibbon & Kee.
[20]  Shub, David. (1961). Novyi Zhurnal no. 63.
[21]  Shub, D. (1966). Lenin: a Biography. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
[22]  Review de Fonds Social Juif. (1970). no. 161.
[23]  Ben-Shlomo, B. Z. (1991). Reporting on Lenin’s Jewish Roots. Jewish Chronicle. July 26. p.2.
[24]  Hoffman, Michael. (1997). Campaign for Radical Truth in History. P.O. Box 849. Coeur d’ Alene, ID 83816. Ehrenburg won the Order of Lenin and the Stalin Prize and willed his papers to the Israeli Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum.
[25]  Goldberg, Anatol. (1984). Ilya Ehrenburg : Revolutionary, Novelist, Poet, War Correspondent, Propagandis : the Extraordinary Epic of a Russian Survivor. New York : Viking.
[26]  Solzhenitsyn, A. (1974). The Gulag Archipelago, 1918-1956 : An Experiment in Literary investigation, I-II. Tran. Thomas P. Whitney. London : Collins: Harvill Press. p.79.
[27]  Aronson, G. (1949). Soviet Russia and the Jews. New York: American Jewish League Against Communism.
[28]  The Jewish Voice. (1942). New York. January.
[29]  The Congress Bulletin. (1940).(New York). American Jewish Congress, January 5.
[30]   George Bernard Shaw, quoted in The Jewish Guardian ( 1931). said: “I have seen the statement which Stalin gave recently to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency on anti-Semitism and in which the Soviet leader said that under the Soviet laws militant Anti-Semitism is punishable by death.”
[31]  Joseph Stalin (Note to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency). 12th January 1931, Collected Works, vol. 13.
[32]   Gregor Aronson. (1949). Soviet Russia and the Jews. New York: American Jewish League Against Communism.
[33]  Encyclopaedia Britannica. (1947). Vol. 2. p.76.
[34]  Latimer, E.W. (1895). Russia and Turkey in the 19th Century. A. C. McLury & Co. p.332.
[35]   Jewish Communal Register of New York City. (1918). p.1018-1019
[36]  New York Journal American (1949). February 3.
[37]  Andelman, M.S. (1974). To Eliminate the Opiate. New York-Tel Aviv: Zahavia. Ltd. 26
[38]  Nedava, J. (1971). Trotsky and the Jews. Philadelphia. Jewish Publication Society.
[39]  Marx, Karl, (1936). Das Kapital. English. New York: The Modern library
[40]  Marx, Karl, (1932). Capital, the Communist manifesto and other writings. New York: The Modern library.
[41]  Chicago Jewish Sentinel. (1975). Inside Judaica.. October 30.
[42]  Barnes Review. (1996). The Racism of Marx and Engles. Oct. vol. 2. 10. p. 3.
[43]  Wilton, R. (1920). Last Days of the Romanovs. New York: George H. Doran Co. 148.
[44]  Rapoport, Louis. (1990). Stalin’s War Against the Jews. Free Press/Simon & Schuster.
[45]  Curtis, William Elroy. (1907). National Geographic Magazine. The Revolution in Russia. May. p.313.
[46]  Orwell, George. (1948). 1984.

Newsweek Magazine Covers Up McCain’s Mob Ties

One of the biggest stories of modern political history is consistently being suppressed by the controlled media

By Michael Collins Piper — AFP

Newsweek—one of the big three “news” magazines—has demonstrated beyond question that the American media is determined to cover up the organized crime origins of the fortune that set John McCain’s political career in motion and made him one of the richest men in Congress.

On June 30, Newsweek published a glowing cover story about McCain’s second (and current) wife, the former Cindy Hensley, featuring a glamorous cover photo of Mrs. McCain, followed by eight full pages of friendly reportage, including another glamour photo of the attractive woman draped across two pages. Mrs. McCain, so it seems, may be a candidate for sainthood.

Although Newsweek said Mrs. McCain’s family “is deeply rooted in Arizona,” and that her late father, Jim Hensley, “was one of the most prominent men in the state,” who was “a World War II bombardier . . . shot down over the English channel,”—in other words, a war hero just like McCain—Newsweek did not even hint of the racketeering and corruption (and murder) associated with Hensley and his patrons in his rise to power.

Newsweek said Hensley “borrowed $10,000 to start a liquor business” which became one of the largest Anheuser-Busch distributorships in the country and pointed out that the vast Hensley influence and fortune (worth $200 million) “got [McCain] access to money and connections” after he divorced his ailing first wife and married his then-mistress, Cindy Hensley, and settled in Arizona where he first ran for office in 1982. What Newsweek chose not to mention is what AFP previously reported:

McCain’s father-in-law got his start as the top henchman for Kemper Marley, who, for 40 years until his death in 1990, was the undisputed political boss of Arizona, acting as the behind-the-scenes power over both the Republican and Democratic parties. But Marley was more than a politician. He was the Meyer Lansky crime syndicate’s chief Arizona operative, front man for the Bronfman family—key players in the Lansky syndicate.

During Prohibition, the Canadian-based Bronfman family supplied and thus controlled the “spigot” of liquor funneled to local Lansky syndicate functionaries in the United States, including Al Capone in Chicago.

After Prohibition, Lansky-Bronfman associates such as Marley got control of a substantial portion of liquor (and beer) distribution across the country. In fact, Marley’s longtime public relations man, Al Lizanitz, revealed it was the Bronfman family that set Marley up in the alcohol business.

However, in 1948, 52 of Marley’s employees (including Jim Hensley, the manager of Marley’s company) were prosecuted for federal liquor violations. Hensley got a six-month suspended sentence and his brother Eugene went to prison for a year.

In 1953, Hensley and (this time) Marley were prosecuted by federal prosecutors for falsifying liquor records. But a young attorney,William Rehnquist, acted as their “mouthpiece” (as mob attorneys are known) and the two got off scot-free. Rehnquist later became chief justice of the Supreme Court and presided over the “fix” that made George W. Bush president in a rightly disputed election.

The story in Arizona is that Hensley took the fall for Marley in 1948 and Marley paid back Hensley by setting him up in his own beer distribution business. Today, Newsweek implies Hensley’s company was a “mom and pop” operation that became a big success, but the real story goes to the heart of the history of organized crime.

Hensley’s sponsor, Marley, was also a major player in gambling, a protégé of Lansky lieutenant Gus Greenbaum who, in 1941, set up a national wire for bookmakers. After Lansky ordered a hit on his own longtime partner, “Bugsy” Siegel, who was stealing money from the Flamingo Casino in Las Vegas—which was financed in part by loans from an Arizona bank chaired by Marley—Greenbaum turned day-to-day operations of the wire over to Marley while Greenbaum took Siegel’s place in tending to Lansky’s interests in Las Vegas.

In 1948 Greenbaum was murdered in a mob “hit” that set off a series of gang wars in Phoenix, but Marley survived and prospered as did his protégé, Jim Hensley, whose fortune sponsored McCain’s rise to power.

McCain’s father-in-law also dabbled in dog racing and expanded his fortune by selling his track to an individual connected to the Buffalo-based Jacobs family, key Prohibition-era cogs in the Lansky network as distributors for Bronfman liquor.

Expanding over the years, buying up racetracks and developing food and drink concessions at sports stadiums, Jacobs enterprises were described as “probably the biggest quasi-legitimate cover for organized crime’s money-laundering in the United States.”

In 1976, Hensley’s mentor—Marley (at the height of his power)—was the key suspect behind the contract murder of journalist Don Bolles who was investigating the mob in Arizona, but Marley was never prosecuted.

All of this is well known in Arizona, but Newsweek is working to keep the story contained.

In 2000, when McCain first ran for president, The Spotlight brought the facts to a national audience for the first time. AFP has since reported on this and many Internet outlets have picked the story up, but do not mention AFP as the source. McCain’s mob ties were also outlined in the book, The New Jerusalem (available from AFP for $20) which has had considerable distribution here and abroad.

Since McCain’s career was sponsored by the Lansky-Bronfman syndicate, it is no coincidence McCain recently traveled to London where Lord Jacob Rothschild of the international banking empire raised money among American expatriates on McCain’s behalf. Rothschild has long been allied with the Bronfman family as major patrons of Israel. 

 
Read more MCP at MikePiperReport.com, also be sure to checkout his RBN Radio archive!

He learned first-hand that communism was not an ideology, it was simply the organization of the worst criminal elements led by Jews to destroy society. This was no speculation. Virtually all the commissars he knew (some of whom he interviewed) where Jewish, while the majority of their activists where common murderers and perverts “liberated” from prison. They were motivated by hatred, power and revenge, nothing else. All their slogans about “Equality” and “Peace” where transparent rues to dupe thoughtless liberals among the Russian people, their victims. Drunk with success, the Jews boasted openly of their plans for world conquest by fomenting the same kind of divisiveness in other countries. They told Pelley that Russia was just a stepping stone, a base for international subversion. Even their phony “communism” was utterly dispensable, just like their own followers, who they never hesitated to massacre on the slightest whim. Their long-range goal was one-world government, in which the masses became willing slaves, fueling an international economy with their genius and labor, while the Jewish people dominated all important positions of power. “After Russia,” one greasy commissar smirked at Pelley, ‘then Europe and later, America!’…” — Exerpt from William Dudley Pelley Father of American Racial Mysticism

Dupes Of Judah – A Challenge To The American Legion

Shall we go to War this time to save Germany’s Jews or Sassoon’s Yellow River Dope Trade?

By William Dudley Pelley

I want to use a little straight-from-the-shoulder language to the men of the American Legion!

I want to talk to them about the inside facts concerning a certain War that twenty years ago made it possible for them to be present Legion members. It’s as plain as the nose on anybody’s face that something like a million American lads went overseas in 1917 to fight a war, about the causes of which they knew next to nothing.

Even today, two decades after, scarcely one veteran in a thousand knows the accurate, concise, inside story of why we got into that War, who got us in, what chestnuts foreign governments pulled out of the fire — or had us pull or had us pull out — and who cracked and ate those chestnuts after we had been bamboozled into helping rake them from the coals of European conflict.

It’s time all of us had a little enlightenment on how such wars are made, who makes ‘em, and what purposes are served by concocting and launching ‘em.

We certainly know who has to fight ‘em!

Understand me, I’m no pacifist. I’m not saying that “war is terrible” or that it “sets back civilization” or that it kills off the cream and bead of a nation’s manhood while weaklings and profiteers are left to enjoy any benefits that subsequently come out of it. I think there are wars that are justified, and that certainly should be fought. I feel that I did my part in the last War, although it happened that my jerk concerned the espionage forces on the Eastern Front. What I mean to say is, I’m not writing this booklet from sentimental reasons or because my conscience hurts me that I did my World War fighting from a swivel chair. My gripe about the last War, and my gripe against the next war — which they’re now cooking up! — are based on the fact that being a reasonably sincere American, born and raised in this country and with forebears in both the Civil and Revolutionary Wars, it burns me up to see equally sincere and patriotic fighting-men hoodwinked, hoaxed and hijacked, called to the colors supposedly to scrap for the nation’s integrity, and then really used as sap cannon-fodder to stop pig-iron in a brawl from which some foreign clique profits.

In other words, I’m ready and eager to stop my share of the pig-iron when my country’s in danger or when her flag’s been insulted. But I’ve got enough gray in my hair at last not to get excited or begin any patriotic screeching when I find that my country’s been deliberately put in danger or her flag’s been insulted with malice aforethought to force her to take sides in some foreign racial squabble.

There’s considerable difference!

Right now I’m plenty hot and bothered, and writing specifically for the men of the American Legion, because I happen to know from first-hand research that a cold-blooded conspiracy is afoot to get us stirred up into fighting another foreign war — and repeating all the experiences of 1917, if you please! — for no other reason than that these radical New-Dealers have made a complete botch of their crack-pot program and are now frantically seeking an “out” to distract public attention from that failure and possible reprisals.

The plight of the Jews — in Germany — and I’m not at all ready to admit that it’s much of a plight outside of the imaginations of the paid propagandists — gives these same New-Dealers precisely the peg they need and want on which to hang a sudden program for “Americanism” and armament….

Hitler’s a “monster,” or so it stacks up to me, because he’s beaten the Jews at their own game of double-cross in Germany and they’re plenty sore about it. So they want us as a nation to go over and shellac him. Or the Sassoon Yellow-River dope trade is threatened by the Nipponese in China, and we must get busy and thrash the Mikado.

A couple of years ago the Jews were bragging that Hitler couldn’t last a year. They’d have him over-thrown in jig-time. But Hitler has lasted, and the Yidds have lost “face.” … If the Germans like Hitler, that’s their business. If the Jews don’t like him, I see no reason for making that our business.

The other day, however, a little undersized Yiddisher runt by the name of Grynszpan was put up to the job of assassinating one of the Nazi envoys to Paris — by the same Jewish big-shots who’ve been eternally plotting to overthrow the Nazi regime from the first. The runt bungled the job and shot the wrong man. He “got” an under-secretary by the name of Von Rath. Hitler’s agents smoked out exactly what had happened, and when the Nazis rioted against Jews all over, and assessed a $406,000,000 fine against ‘em as a lesson, the Jews over here said: “Swell! That sort of stuff plays right into our hands. Now watch us capitalize on it with the American sentimentalists to take the United States for a final one-way ride!”

Now don’t get me wrong! I’m no Nazi propagandist apologizing for Hitler. I don’t believe his brand of government would work for Americans any more than Stalin’s brand of government would work for Americans. But having kept up a lot of my espionage connections since the war, I know a thing or two about what goes on behind the scenes.

I know, for instance, that with the “kikes” swarming into the Federal Administration thicker than midges in fly-time, and with their hate and chagrin over Hitler added to their vast New-Deal flop, the whole Von Rath episode — coupled with Japan’s winning of the China War — give Roosevelt and his White House Sanhedrin precisely the opportunity they wanted to heat us to war fever anew and engage us with whosoever stands up to us firmest.

What I have behind my eyebrows to do first is to set forth clearly and simply — and in a way that the average Legion man and patriot can grasp — just what a mighty piece of skulduggery we were sold upon ‘in 1917, and what the “backstairs” truth was, about getting us into the muddle that killed some fifty thousand lads like you and me,

It’s a strange fact, but up till a few weeks ago I’d not been able in twenty years to find a single piece of literature that set forth in concise, understandable fashion the naked truth as to why the World War broke out at all, or why — having broken out — it lasted four years, or why it was required for us to get into it, upsetting the lives of a hundred million people, shipping a million of them overseas, and butchering fifty thousand of them just to prove that we took part in it.

Of course, the average American thinks the War broke out because the German Kaiser was getting too cocky and rattling his sabre about Europe till the Allied nations got fed up, on his bombast. Then somebody killed an Archduke at Sarajevo, and Serbia wouldn’t apologize. Russia mobilized and that scared France and England. Nobody would back down. All the Allies wanted Germany licked “that the world might be safe for Democracy.” … After the stramash had been going three years, a German U-boat sank one of our steamships, killing a bunch of important Americans. That was an insult we couldn’t overlook, so we too armed and stepped into the fray — to show we could heave pig-iron around with the best of ‘em, That’s the World War — on paper — and in the mind of the average citizen who is average because he never dreams what all these diplomatic and overseas messes are about.

I plead guilty to being as dumb as the rest of ‘em when I started for the Eastern Front in 1917. But I hadn’t been out there long before I began to learn things: things that never saw the newspapers and were rarely allowed to get into the dispatches. Being indirectly in the espionage division, of course I had the chance to learn ‘em.

After coming home, however, and living two post-war decades, I never found a dozen paragraphs, that set forth the true facts in a simple and compact manner until the other day an American-Hungarian lawyer in Cleveland by the name of Louis K. Birinyi got out a book Why the Treaty of Trianon is Void. Being a native Hungarian, Dr. Birinyi was all worked up over what happened to his country at the Peace Conference — or for that matter is still happening in the center of all this Fascist business in Europe. He sent me a copy of his book, with an exceedingly complimentary inscription on the flyleaf. I took it to bed with me one night and started to read it in desultory manner. I supposed it was “just another” of those literary post-mortems. Suddenly I found myself broad awake and paying strict attention. This Cleveland Hungarian was in possession of the facts. He was tossing ‘em out in paragraphs that scoured.

Here at last was the book, and the inside presentation that I had searched vainly twenty years to find. The Doctor wasn’t trying to sell anything. He wasn’t even trying to sell a book written by himself. He was pouring out his heartbreak on paper, over the fate of his native country, but in so doing he was spilling the beans all over the place!

I mention Dr. Birinyi’s book, not to “plug” sales for it, though it deserves all the plugging it can get, but because I propose to draw on a lot of what that Cleveland attorney has got in his pages — as well as irrefutable government documents — and I don’t want to filch his material without credit or conceal my sources. For some reason or other, I tell you, until the Birinyi book came out there had scarcely been a line published anywhere that revealed the nature of the backstairs chicanery that went on, setting Europe afire and killing fifty thousand of your buddies and mine when we ran with our own buckets to help put the blaze out.

Somehow or other, looking back on it now, this too wasn’t accident.

It was to somebody’s advantage to conceal and suppress such facts.

And they have been concealed and suppressed.

Most of you remember, I think, that Woodrow Wilson came back from the Peace Conference with a gripe to the effect that “there was a power controlling Europe with which he couldn’t cope.” I recall reading it in our American newspapers at the time, and have heard constant references to it since. Well, with all the high jinks that are going on at present — about which I know so much that I might sleep a whole lot better o’ nights if I knew less — I make the fair deduction that the same “power” that Wilson confessed he couldn’t cope with, might have had a lot to do with seeing to it that the real story behind the World War and our share in it, has been kept under pot-lid and the odor of what was in the pot never allowed to reach the public nostrils.

Before I’ll see the same gang put it over on us again, and send another fifty thousand fine lads to die in Europe in a repeat performance, I’ll take the pot-cover off myself.

Whether you men of the American Legion can “take it” or not, remains to be seen. Some of you will undoubtedly get plenty sore. It always makes a real American sore to find that somebody has played him for a sucker.

My contention, based on the facts that I’m going to give you, is that all of us — not only the lads of the American Legion but the entire American people — were played for suckers in 1917 and that the same conniving crowd is now out to play us for suckers again.

However, to the hot stuff….

Ever since the Armistice, it’s a recognized fact, nation after nation — and whole blocs of nations — have been as voluble as an equal number of old women in a small-town sewing circle, trying to explain who was responsible for the War. Germany was responsible for the War, said the British. Russia was responsible, said the German monarchists. When the crowd of burglars at the Peace Conference got around the table to divide up the territory of the Central Powers between themselves, they alibied what they were doing by declaring that Austria-Hungary was responsible for the War — because her government insisted on an apology from the Serbs for the death of an Archduke.

Every nation on earth, at some time or other it appears, has been charged with responsibility for the World War. Every people who ever came within sound of a whiz-bang or kicked in ten cents to save a flock of starving war orphans, has been charged with responsibility for the World War. The only people to date who haven’t been charged with such responsibility, is the crowd that was responsible. And its chief job in life has been to cover up.

Perhaps you may ask, “Why go into that? What does it matter who was responsible at this late day?” I tell you that it makes a whale of a lot of “matter,” in view of the fact that the same mob, never having been exposed, is up to its former tricks and popping all its trouser-buttons right now to stage a repeat performance!

Of all the statesmen of the warring countries, Lloyd George of England is the only one left who dared indicate that somebody caused the war who hasn’t to date been named. On one occasion he apologized for all the statesmen of all the warring countries by saying that “nobody quite meant war.” … Here is his blurb, uttered on December 23, 1920, to the Empire Parliamentary Association: “The more one reads memoirs and books written in the various countries of what happened before August, 1914, the more one realizes that no one at the head of affairs quite meant war. It was something into which they glided, stumbled and staggered.”

On January 6, 1923, in a syndicated article he said: “The more one examines the events of July, 1914, the more one is impressed with the shrinking of the nominal rulers of the attacking empires, and with the relentless driving onward of the military organizations behind these terror-stricken dummies. No one ever believed that the cause of the war was the shooting of the Grand Duke of Austria.”

In other words, it wasn’t kings and kaisers and Prime Ministers and Chancellors who brought on the Big Slaughter. These were just poor dummies and stooges. No, it was militarism that brought on the War, militarism that originated of itself, that expanded of itself, that moved onward of itself, and that finally shot itself oil with scarcely an erring human hand to guide it.

What a lovely blob of hooey!

“No one at the head of affairs quite meant war. The “nominal rulers,” those “terror-stricken dummies,” could not of their own will make war. Emperors, diplomatists and statesmen were unable to prevent war. “The relentless driving onward of the military organizations behind these terror-stricken dummies” forced the war ahead.

In other words, little male children of the American Legion, if you have one Winchester rifle hung on a peg in your home it isn’t particularly dangerous, either to you or to society; but if you get a big bankroll, and once a week for a period of years buy another Winchester rifle until your house is so filled with them that you can’t eat or sleep there, the moment will arrive when those guns of themselves will all want to go bang-bang! They are not so much lumber in the stocks that might otherwise make chair-legs, or so much iron in the barrels that might otherwise make engine-housings. By the sheer fact of being wood and iron, brought together in the pattern of firearms, they all would a-hunting go and blow the eternal gizzards out of anyone in front of ‘em ! That’s what the Lloyd Georges ask us to believe in regard to world armament.

“Wait a minute,” begs the stickler for facts. “You’re not quite right. Of course numbers of guns don’t make them explode of themselves. What Lloyd George meant to say, and practically did say, was that the existence of great military organizations and over-equipped armies, made the leaders of those armies just naturally want to fight. It’s the same as putting a loaded revolver in a man’s hand. He wants to sight along the barrel and pull the trigger, just to see if it will shoot!”

That’s generally the idea of how it is, when Militarism comes in for a raking. And the nitwits nod their heads in approval. But let’s not go off half-cocked. Let’s look at this thing.

The “existence of great military organizations makes, them want to fight.” … Is that so? Ho! … and likewise Hum! Well, why doesn’t someone name the specific gentlemen in the British Army, or the German Army, or the French Army, or even in our American Army, who prior to 1914 were so bursting with over-equipped combativeness that the world just had to fight. Was it Lord Kitchener? Was it Field Marshal Haig? Was it Ludendorff or Hindenburg? Was it Papa Joffre or Marshal Foch? Right here at home, have we ever observed that men like General Leonard Wood, Blackjack Pershing, or General MacArthur, ever spoiled for a scrap just because they headed up big numbers of fighting-men? Isn’t it a fact that the big-shots at the heads of military machines deplore the whole business, and feel their responsibilities heaviest to keep men out of war?

Or go on down through the ranks of any army.

Specifically in the World War — or before it — was it the colonels, the majors, the captains, the first and second lieutenants, or the top-sergeants, who wanted the war? If so, may we ask since when did emperors, diplomatists, prime ministers and generals harken to the gripes of colonels, majors, captains and top-sergeants, that a war should be started so that they could bang-off their fire-sticks? Applesauce!

Someone, somewhere, was responsible for creating those great military machines because someone, somewhere, expected to use ‘em! In this day and age, kings and kaisers and prime ministers and chancellors don’t run amuck up and down the earth, doing as they please in international diplomacy. They find themselves quickly accountable to parliaments, reichs, and congresses. The Kitcheners, Haigs, Ludendorffs, Foches and Pershings don’t run amuck with the military machines which they head, and force the kings and kaisers to fight; they simply follow orders — like the buck private at the bottom of the system.

If nobody issued the orders from a higher source, then there would never be a war. That’s common sense! So, if we go up the line, past the sergeants and captains and majors and colonels and generals and chancellors and prime ministers and kaisers and kings, and find each of these accountable to some embodiment of authority that’s still higher, we must come to the parliaments and reichs and congresses. Were they responsible for the World War? Well, whether or not they were, let’s ask ourselves what these parliaments and reichs and congresses are, but aggregations of people’s representatives. But did they represent common citizens who wanted to get into uniforms and carve the viscera out of folks across each border? We all know what a howl went up from the masses as the war-clouds mounted higher!

No! — midway between the citizenry that had to take time off from private pursuits to march forth and get shot, and the political and military bigwigs who took orders from representative parliamentary bodies and carried ‘em out, was some provocative influence that convinced the people’s representatives in all nations that war was necessary and inevitable. After the convincing had been done — in other words, when the militarism had been set in motion — the rest was executive detail carried into action.

It’s squarely on the shoulders of this Provocative Influence that we can pin the World War’s responsibility — just as we can pin additional responsibility right at this moment on the Provocative Influence now working overtime to touch off a Second World War.

This reasoning is sound, little male children of the American Legion!

Now let’s dig into cold, irrefutable, historical fact and see what the Provocative Influence was, behind the parliaments, reichs, congresses, and political and military big-shots twenty years ago, that ultimately landed most of you in France and kept fifty thousand of you there as very permanent guests….

Those of us who went overseas and had any contact whatever with the folks of the embattled nations, will be inclined to agree that no particular country or its nationals wanted, caused, or started the World War. It is more or less true that the “nominal rulers,” the “terror-stricken dummies,” the emasculated diplomatists and statesmen, were unable to prevent the War’s outbreak. And yet we do know that the military organizations of all the warring countries were plenty active in preparing for the War, no matter what the emperors, kings, kaisers, diplomatists, or statesmen said, thought, or intended. But these military organizations were merely instrumentalities — effective tools in the hands of some heretofore unmentioned and unseen power. We now summon to our aid the history of Europe. What the statesmen refused to disclose, history commences to reveal.

And the first revelation we come upon, and are obliged to consider, has to do with Money!

Wars can’t be fought without spondulics. Someone must put up the cash, or be willing to put up the cash, or the kings, diplomatists and statesmen must know where the cash is, whether it comes forth willingly or has to be conscripted. If the bankers of a nation — any nation! — don’t want an offensive war, or if they’re convinced that war means loss to their coffers, make no mistake about it, they’re in a position to stop it before it’s even talked about. If you think I’m talking through my hat in this, or want to advance the argument that “it doesn’t cost anything to kill a man,” I respectfully refer you to any good history of the House of Rothschild.

I haven’t seen any history of the House of Rothschild yet that hasn’t contained gloating statements concerning the numbers of times since the beginning of the 19th century that rulers have approached the House of Rothschild for cash for wars. If the Rothschilds decided that the wars looked profitable to themselves, they arranged for the payments and the wars came pronto! If the Rothschilds decided there wouldn’t be a whole lot gained, financially, or the risks were too great, or they didn’t happen to have the mazuma on the nail at the moment, the rulers went away with a polite turn-down. And there was no conflict!

From the very beginning of the history of the House of Rothschild — founded on the cash which George III paid the German Landgrave for the “loan” of the Hessian soldiers that composed the bulk of the “British” forces in our American Revolution — that particular Yiddisher financial family has been bankers to the political and military potentates of Europe. At least Central Europe!

The Rothschilds, of course, are mainly German Jews. Such German Jews, together with Polish Jews and Russian Jews, we call Ashkenazim.

Ashkenazic Jews, in other words, are the Jews of Germany, Poland, and Russia — with a strong strain of Oriental blood from the Genghis Kahn infusion. When they combine their Hebrew with the German, Polish, or Russian tongues, they get a polyglot language that is popularly called “Yiddish.” So it’s entirely proper to refer to these oriental Jews as “Yiddishers.”…

But we shouldn’t gallop away with the idea that the Yiddisher Rothschilds compose the only mob of Jews overseas that’s got money — big money! There are two or three other Jewish fortunes overseas, of which you don’t hear so much.

There’s the money of the Samuel family that controls the Dutch Shell Oil Company — in fact, most of the British oil interests in the Levant. There is the money of the Sassoon clan that controls the vast Indian and Chinese dope trade. There is the Mond fortune, the Isaacs fortune, Lord Reading’s — and finally the Montagu fortune, Montagu Norman being head of the Bank of England itself.

I heard a British intelligence officer remark once in a casual conversation that the fortune of the Samuel family — headed up by the “Right Honorable” Herbert Samuel, made a Viscount, if you please, last year! — was greater than Morgan’s, greater than Rockefeller’s, greater than Ford’s.

These five great families of so-called English Jews — English only because they have resided in Great Britain for generations and intermarried with impoverished English aristocrats — aren’t Ashkenazim. In other words, they haven’t got the Oriental, Russian, German, or Polish strain in ‘em.

No! All these families, whose vast wealth absolutely dominates the Bank of England, are more accurately classed as Sephardim. They’re so-called white Jews — or Jews who a couple of hundred years ago started to interbreed with the more Aryan races of Spain, Italy, Portugal, and France. Finally when they got across to England, they became English jews — as we know ‘em. Their Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, French and English bloods predominate over their Jewish blood. This gives them the notion that they are very high-class indeed. The big hooked nose which the Ashkenazic Jew acquired from the Assyrian — “schnozzle” if you please! — is missing in the Sephardic Jew. Physically, excepting a certain rubbery cunning about the expression of the eyes, he’s come to appear like a Spaniard, an Italian, a Portuguese, a Frenchman, or an Englishman.

Such persons as Disraeli in yesterday’s generation, or Barney Baruch, George Arliss, Sam Insull, or even Franklin D. Roosevelt — whose true ancestral name has come to light under the investigations of the Carnegie Foundation as Rossocampo-Rosenvelt — are outstanding specimens of the Sephardic Jew.

There is furthermore this difference between the Ashkenazic Jew and the Sephardic Jew:

The Ashkenazic Jew holds in the main that world Jewry is a race — a political race, so to speak. The Sephardic Jew holds in the main that world Jewry is a religious denomination.

Both of these claims are capital expediencies when Jews as Jews are having the squeeze put on them for predatory tactics against Gentiles —

The Ashkenazim shriek “Racial persecution!” The Sephardim screech “Religious intolerance!” Both of these about cover the situation….

Now, broadly speaking, here’s the way we can boil down the money-banker situation as it existed on the Continent prior to 1914: The Ashkenazic Rothschilds had the big bank roll behind Germany and the Central Powers; the Sephardic Samuels had the big bank roll behind France, England and the Allies. A perfectly gorgeous set-up it was, for a knock-down drag-out fight, when we take into consideration one of the outstanding differences of temperament existing between these two Jewish factions —

Believe it or not, but up to the time when all world Jewry was threatened because of the Nazi ascendancy in Central Europe, the Sephardic Jews looked upon the Ashkenazic Jews with an intolerance and detestation only comparable to the Nazi attitude toward Jews in the Fatherland!

The Sephardic Jews, as I said, considered themselves the aristocrats of World Jewry — because of their heavy infusion of Aryan blood and their more aesthetic temperament. To them, the Yiddishers were “just human trash” and we don’t have to probe far into the annals of Jewry to recognize what a tragedy it was considered, when a Sephardic Jewess fell in love with, and married, an Ashkenazic boy.

Do you know where the slang term “Kike” came from? I’ll tell you, and you can take my word for it that I’m speaking without bias. The slang term “Kike” is a Sephardic-Jewish epithet originated by that caste of Jewry to describe the schnozzle-faced quasi-oriental Ashkenazim whom it detests!

Although few Gentiles have had cause to be aware of it, the feud between the Sephardim and Ashkenazim, over the past two hundred years, has been strong and bitter.

Of course there was inter-marrying, and inter-financing between the two groups. But in the main the animosity was something that had to be reckoned with, in Mitteleuropa’s politics.

With this racial background roughly painted in, now we can go one step further and see how these two groups of Jewry influenced overseas affairs before 1914….

Back in 1815, at the close of the Napoleonic Wars and before the House of Rothschild was as powerful as it later became, the Congress of Vienna divided up Europe and bartered millions of human beings to the victorious military commanders who had put the squelch on the Little Corporal. Naturally a storm of bitter protest was heard in every corner of the Continent. It took fifty years for the peoples of Europe — after much privation, starvation, and bloodshed — to correct the evils committed by the Congress of Vienna. Germany was consolidated and Italy was unified. The industries of Germany started to boom. So too did the size of the Rothschild fortune. The greater bulk of it was invested in industrial securities in Germany and Austria-Hungary, or in ownership of coal and iron mines and transportation facilities.

In consequence of all this, the territory of Germany began to show itself as too small to absorb her industrial products. An outside market had to be secured — in fact, if her industries were to sell goods and pay proper dividends, the markets of all the world had to be opened to “Germans” … a camouflage word for the sponsoring Rothschilds!

On the other hand, over in Holland and England, the white Sephardic Jews had their money invested heavily in British and Dutch securities. Moreover, their trade was already world-wide and the British into whose official government they were infiltrating — quite as brazenly as they have lately infiltrated into the American government under Roosevelt — had a tradition of “ruling the waves.”

Thus a trade war was inaugurated, bloodless at first, between the great vested interests of Ashkenazic-Jewish Germany and the great vested interests of Sephardic-ruled Britain. The two mighty divisions of World Jewry were slashing and hacking at each other but letting the “German” and “English” people each think that the other as nationals were out to “do” them.

Now get this, little male children of the American Legion, and let it sink in, for this is the reason that you went overseas to fight in a war — Ashkenazic-Germany’s only entrance into the Atlantic Ocean was through the English Channel. Passage of German ships through the Channel was possible only by the consent of Sephardic-Jewish England. This being clear enough, England and Germany (Gentile) began to build battleships to unheard-of proportions. But it was soon discovered that battleships wouldn’t secure to Ashkenazic-Jewish Germany the freedom of the seas which the Rothschild interests wanted, or the free and unmolested movement of international trade. Therefore, the Ashkenazic Jews of Rothschild-dominated Germany conceived the idea of building a railroad.

It was to become called in time the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad! It was to lead from Berlin down into Austria-Hungary, through the Balkans and into Turkey — ending in Bagdad, in Asia.

Over this railroad, Ashkenazic-Jewish Germany could reach the larger portion of the world’s population and transact most of the international commerce of the world without interference from the Sephardic Jews of Britain.

That is to say, whoever would have control of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad would have control of the greatest bulk of the international commerce of the world. But the control and successful operation of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad necessitated the control of the territories through which it passed.

Therefore the plan of “Mitteleuropa” was conceived!

Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Balkans, and Turkey, were to be controlled by the owners of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad — that is, the Ashkenazic Rothschilds.

The “Pan-German Movement,” the shibboleth of “Deutschland Uber Alles,” and all those other idiotic utterances which the Jews love so dearly to put into the mouths of Gentiles, were slogans for this plan. The “integrity” of the Austria-Hungarian monarchy was indispensable, therefore Hungary was forced under the despotic control of the Austrian Crown.

While the plan of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad was being promoted, however, another movement got under way. It came from Russia. On paper it was called the “Pan Slavic Movement.”

Russia, a big and rich country, had no ice-free outlet to the high seas. The Baltic is frozen during the greater part of the year. The Black Sea is an inland waterway and its only outlet to the Mediterranean Sea is at Constantinople. To secure this outlet, Russia would have to control the Dardanelles and a part of the Balkans.

In 1877, Russia had made an effort to obtain control of this outlet, and declared war upon Turkey under the still popular pretext that “the Turks had mistreated the Christians” in the Balkans. Turkey was thrashed, the “Christians” were forgotten, but Constantinople was seized by Russia.

Now mark this —

A growing feud was arising between the Jews of the world, particularly the Ashkenazic Jews, and the Throne of the Romanoffs. Russia as an empire was so vast, her resources so tremendous, and her government so absolute, that the Jews couldn’t get their talons into her flesh as they had into Germany’s or England’s. The Czar’s government rarely had to borrow money from Continental Jewish pawnbrokers — whom Father Coughlin designates so courteously as “the international bankers” — or if it did, it never met with much embarrassment paying such loans back. Furthermore, because the Czar’s military commanders found that wherever Jews were domiciled near army cantonments they invariably sold military secrets to Russia’s enemies, and still further, because Jewish loan sharks were foreclosing mortgages on vast areas of the land of ignorant peasants, the Czar’s government had issued some particularly strong edicts against the Jews, which made that race view the Romanoffs with deadly hatred.

They were out to “get” the Romanoffs, and in the end they succeeded — the Lenin-Stalin government of Bolshevia being the achievement. We’ll come to that later.

The Romanoffs were by no means fools, and they kept accurate track of what these international mischief-makers proposed to do in the matter of splitting Europe from Berlin to Bagdad with a railroad. The Czar’s government saw immediately that if the Rothschilds got their railroad down to Bagdad, they would have the first clutch at Russia by shutting off her world commerce and commence to make her pay through the nose.

To go back to 1877, however, when Russia thrashed Turkey and got control of the Dardanelles, the Ashkeniazic Jews of the central European countries were furious. So for once they made common cause with the Sephardim of England — the Sephardic Jew, Disraeli, being English Prime Minister at the time — and presented to the British Gentiles that Russia in control of the Dardanelles was a menace to Britannia’s ruling the waves. Therefore it wasn’t difficult to get the British to step into the Turkish situation and force the Czar to relinquish.

Take note that even back there in those days, the common soldiers — fellows like ourselves — who had fought and bled and died that Russia might shellac Turkey, made their “sacrifices” all in vain when the Jews of the world had a plan to work out to promote their own interests.

England blocked the scheme of Russia to get an ice-free outlet to the high seas, and this act caused Russia to become the sworn enemy of what appeared — on the surface to be Germany, Austria, and England. Truly it caused Russia, or the monarchy of the Romanoffs, to become the sworn enemies of the Jews who controlled Germany, Austria, and England — Ashkenazim and Sephardim alike.

Right there, in that situation, lay the “makin’s” of the war that all the weak-kneed diplomatists and statesmen of the world have been charging up to the militarists and German monarchists. Right there, in that situation, lay the “makin’s” of the conflict that you and I — in utter ignorance of all this internal Jewish skulduggery — were persuaded to go overseas and fight under the slogan that we were going “to make the world safe for Democracy.”

Sheep-dip!

So in those peaceful years before 1914, the big Rothschild Jews of Germany were going ahead with their plans for a Berlin-Bagdad Railroad that was to bottle up Russia at the Dardanelles and smash the world-wide commerce of the French and English Sephardic Jews of Paris and London. If, however, Germany could be “isolated,” or a first-class war made to break out that ended with the everlasting daylights walloped out of her, then the construction of this Berlin-Bagdad project could be effectively “dynamited.”… The English Sephardim were past masters at the job of building “coalitions,” and they had the money to act as pay-mistress of Britain’s “allies.”… Why not, with the Bank of England in their control? Furthermore, the Sephardic Jews of France were more closely related to them than the quasi-oriental “kikes” of Germany and Austria.

On the other hand, Russia hated those same “kikes” of Germany more than she did the Sephardim of England.

So many minor differences with France were patched up, and in 1904 the two predominantly Sephardic countries entered into a combination, against the Ashkenazic countries-called the Entente Cordiale. But the Ashkenazic crowd saw the jam they were making for themselves, and engineered the Triple Alliance — Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy.

For this combination, the Entente Cordiale was no match. Therefore the Sephardim of England, working through their Gentile Fronts of aristocratic British old-family statesmen, enticed Russia to join the Entente Cordiale, and thus the Triple Entente was formed — England, France, and Russia — the “Allies” to you!

Russia’s entry into the Triple Entente was obtained by reason of the fact that the plan for the Berlin-Bagdad-Rothschild railway crossed up the Russian plan of reaching an outlet to the Mediterranean Sea. The railway was to cross the Turkish Channels at Constantinople, where Russia planned to reach the sea. Thus, with the help of Gentile Czardom, Sephardic England could effectively block the development and completion of the Rothschild project that otherwise would have put both Romanoffs and Sephardim at the mercy of the Ashkenazim.

Here we have a complete picture of the European Situation. And if you think I’m hatching it’ up out of my own brain, let me tell you that a lot of what I’m giving you can be found in Document 346 of the records of the 67th Congress of the United States. Only it won’t do you any good to go writing to Washington for Document 346. Believe me, although done at the government printing office, it’s long since been “exhausted.” And never reprinted! You bet it wasn’t!

From 1907 to 1914, Europe was divided into two powerful camps: the Triple Entente — “Allies” to you, again ! — guarding the interests of the Romanoffs and the Sephardim, and the Triple Alliance — the “Central Powers ” — guarding the Berlin-Bagdad-Rothschild scheme to thus get the Romanoffs and the Sephardim over a barrel.

Of course, both camps saw to it that the Gentile nations involved armed themselves to the teeth. With these big capitalistic Jews practically dictating to the press — exactly as they’re doing here in the United States at the present moment — this was a push-over. The poisoned pen was put to work and virulent propaganda put into operation to create the maximum of international hatred. The Ashkenazim told the gullible Germans that France and England were out to “do” ‘em, deny ‘em a place in the sun, and steal their colonies. “Gott strafe England!” was the slogan fed to the poor Heinies for breakfast, dinner, and supper. The common people of England, France, and Russia, did not know what or who was behind all the arming of Germany. The Kaiser was just the semi-paralytic figure-head that went about thinking he bossed the Fatherland. But he personalized “German aggression,” and the English and French Gentiles fell for the hoax by the millions. Why not, when they couldn’t get any other information? The Sephardim went the Ashkenazim ten better, in cooking up propaganda, for they had the most at stake if the latter won out.

In England, the big-shot Sephardic Jew at the head of the British press was Lord Northcliffe, who early in life had taken the Aryan name of Alfred Harmsworth. He played the game of the Sephardic-Samuels crew to the limit, creating a psychology throughout the British Empire that war was “inevitable.”

Sure it was “inevitable ” — because the Ashkenazic mob was determined to use the armies of German Gentiles to fight for its project to a finish, and the Sephardim were just as determined that they were going to use the armies of English, French — and later American — Gentiles to see that the Ashkenazim were stopped.

It was “inevitable” in Jewish minds only, and for Jewish purposes and profits. Today, here in America, we’re witnessing the same sort of satanic skulduggery as night after night our newspapers tell us that war against both Hitler and Japan is “inevitable.”

More sheep-dip!

Here’s an interesting sidelight on how much the dummy rulers of the later-embattled peoples wanted war.

Did you know that back in November, 1910, while the (Jewish) subsidized press of each of the countries to be involved were feeding their poison of international hatred to their readers, and while the uniformed imbeciles and paid stooges of these Jewish blocs were shouting for war, two rulers — the Emperor of Germany and the Czar of Russia — sat quietly down to a lunch-table in Potsdam and earnestly discussed ways and means to avert the threatened hostilities?

There at a lunch-table, undisturbed by the howlings of the Jew-paid war maniacs, these two rulers worked out between themselves a just basis for a peaceful existence of the two countries. Germany was to acknowledge Russia’s control over access through Persia to the high seas, and Russia — at least the Romanoff court — was to withdraw her opposition to the “German” plan of building the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad.

This is history, and the event is of historical importance! Civilized mankind might ponder it with great moral benefit. The two rulers came together, without any Yiddisher or Sephardic kibitzers present — just as Hitler, Mussolini and Chamberlain did the other day over in Munich — and settled a vexatious problem, or so they supposed, by a peaceful two-hour discussion over a lunch-table. If this could he done, and was done, why was a disastrous four-year war sprung upon the nations of the world?

The answer is simple —

What these “dummy” rulers said or did was no part of the schemes, rivalries, and hatreds of these swollen-with-power Jewish financial groups. The quasi-oriental Ashkenazim were out to smash or harness the Sephardim in the matter of international trade and finance. And the means that each side proposed to use in the final extremity was the Gentile armies of the countries involved. Therefore the agreement of the Kaiser and the Czar not to fight and thus commit national suicide, was “frustrated.”…

In other words, when the show-down came, they had precious little to say about it. The Kaiser’s court was almost entirely staffed with big-shot Ashkenazic Yiddishers. The Barney Baruch of Germany in those days was the Jew Walter Rathenau. This was the same Jew who shipped Lenin across Germany in the latter days of the war, to overthrow and exterminate the Romanoffs. “Three hundred men,” he once said, “not generally known to the public, govern the fate of Europe!” He did not add that the three hundred were big-shot Jews or that kaisers and czars were by no means among them.

Here’s another instance —

In order to fight a war in Europe to determine whether or not the Rothchilds’ Berlin-Bagdad Railroad was going through, there had to be people who wanted war, and armies and navies which would do the fighting, and finally, money on which to finance it. France and England had the armies, navies, and money, but no people who wanted war. Germany had all the requirements because there the Jews were more firmly entrenched in official positions. But the Sephardic financiers began their “financial mobilization” in that they quietly began recalling any loans they had in Germany. And the German financiers just as quietly began to cache their war boodle outside of Germany, knowing that the fighting might come in that country and their money be subject to seizure. When the German Kaiser called together the “German” financiers just after the abortive Morocco Incident and asked them to prepare Germany’s finances for war, the “German” financiers politely informed them that there would be no war because the “German” gold was at that time out of Germany. That settled the question of war. The Gentiles of France and England hadn’t been sufficiently steamed up to the point where such a war would gain the objectives that the Jews desired.

So you see, little male children of the American Legion, what is revealed when the curtain is rolled back and the “international financiers” — in other words, world-plotting Yidds! — are discovered in their true roles. They did not recognize the “opportunity” for war to be “favorable,” and there was no war.

The “inevitable” outbreak of the war came when the world-plotting Yidds decided that propaganda in all countries had the Gentiles plenty heated up so that their war would not misfire. Serbia particularly was made a hot-bed of poisonous propaganda. The Serbian propagandists invaded Austria and Hungary, poured out money like water, and created disturbances. International hatred in France — against “the Huns” — was worked up to hysterical pitch. War was in the air. War “had to come.” Only a good pretext had to be found.

In 1912-13 another attempt was made to “feel out” the people and to test the time, whether or not it was favorable for conflict. The Balkan War broke out. Russia and Austria mobilized. But the opportunity was “not favorable” and there was no war till the following August.

But the agitation continued — exactly as the Roosevelt-Jewish crowd is keeping up the agitation here today for a mix-up with Germany and Japan. Each nation sold its people on the “necessity” for arming to the teeth. The peoples of every nation were groaning under the weight of heavy armaments, but the Invisible Power (Jewish) continued with feverish energy the preparation of the public mind for the conflict that was coming.

This propaganda assumed such alarming proportions that on one occasion the Gentile Lord Welby, of the English Treasury, cried: “We are in the hands of an organization of crooks!” Sure he was! Jewish crooks! The Rothschilds had to be kept from building a railroad, though a dozen nations were wrecked in doing it!

The drive to create the pretext for war was now concentrated in Serbia. The foci of trouble were recognized again at the intersection of “German” and Russian plans. To force the issue, Hungary was terrorized by the Serbian propagandists and agents provocateur. Finally the directors of the plan resorted to plain murder.

Two young Jews, misnamed “students,” were selected and carefully trained by “Serbian” officials, and supplied with weapons of murder from the arsenals of Serbia, and then sent out on their villainous journey.

On June 28, 1914, these two young Heebs assassinated the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, together with his wife at his side.

Thus by a carefully planned murder, the fuse was lit and the great conflagration started.

The plan for the murder was hatched in Serbia. But get this, little male children of the American Legion — The bill for the job was paid from London.

Were the Sephardim on the job of smashing the Rothschilds’ railroad scheme — or were they not?

The payment was made directly through the Serbian Legation stationed at London. In proof of this statement, John Bull, an English publication, printed a letter written on the official sheet of the Serbian Legation at London, date April 5, 1914 — note that date! — which, decoded, read as follows —

For the elimination of F. F. (Franz Ferdinand,) the sum 2,000 pounds sterling, will be paid as follows: 1,000 pounds on your arrival in Belgrade (capital of Serbia) by the hands of Mr. G and the rest of 1,000 pounds on finishing the work paid as above. The sum of 200 pounds for expenses and to pay agents.

In other words, the young Jew Princip, who fired the shot that started the world war and in due course of time made you American Legionnaires when your country had been propagandized into joining all the brilliant business, got ten grand in American cash for the murder, and one grand for the expense of getting to Belgrade from London.

And they talk about Germany’s having started the war! — not that I’m doing any apologizing for Germany, but the facts are the facts!

The fuse was lit. The German Emperor frantically sent his telegrams to the Czar begging him to avert the catastrophe. The Czar as frantically replied that the German Kaiser should stop the war. The French and English statesmen kept the wires sizzling, appealing to all and sundry to stop the war. But war had to come. The Ashkenazim and Sephardim had fixed it all up so that war was “inevitable.”… As Lloyd George said, the “terror-stricken dummies” could not stop the war.

The uncrowned and invisible rulers of Europe (Jewish) decreed that there should be war. And there was war! And was it a war?

You American’ Legion lads should know! You went out and did your share of stopping the German pig-iron, that the Rothschild railroad should become a flop!

Now, having said this much, I’m going, still further and tell you lads more, of what patsies these big-shot Jews made of you, that the world might be kept safe for Sephardic Democracy.

The War had scarcely been going a year, and English Tommies and French poilus were still wondering “what it was all about,” when the Sephardic Jews of the Allied nations got together and signed among themselves what they called the Treaty of London.

This Treaty of London, entered into by the Allied Powers on April 26, 1915, proved definitely that the main purpose of the whole stramash was to exterminate the power of the German “kike.”

In that Treaty, central Europe and a part of Asia were divided and distributed among England, France, Italy, Rumania, Russia, Serbia, and Montenegro, as follows —

England was to receive the neutral zones of Persia, southern Mesopotamia and Bagdad — all with their heavy oil deposits, and a portion of the German colonies.

France was to get Syria and the oil fields of Mosul, Alsace-Lorraine and the Saar Valley — rich in iron mines and smelters, temporary occupation of the left bank of the Rhine, and a goodly chunk of the German colonies;

Italy was to receive the Trentino, Triest and Istria, a generous share of the Dalmatian coasts, Smyrna and its hinterland, and numerous islands too bothersome to mention — in lieu of all which, she deserted the Entente Cordiale as most of us recall;

Russia was to receive Constantinople and nearly the whole of Turkey in Europe, the Bosporous, the Dardanelles, and the Sea of Marmora, and full liberty of action in Persia.

Serbia, Rumania, and Montenegro were to have what was left of the loot parceled out among ‘em.

It was a Jewish burglar’s deal from send-off, and even Woodrow Wilson didn’t know about it when the Warburg’s and the rest of the Jewish crew finagling us into the mess of it, forced him to declare war over the Lusitania sinking.

The man actually thought that the German Kaiser threatened the world’s Democracy. He sat in the White House and wrote scholarly papers while Baruch ran the shebang from the Sephardic standpoint. When he came to go to Europe for the Peace Conference, after you little male children of the American Legion had left fifty thousand of your buddies lying stark in No Man’s Land for the Messrs. Rothschilds’ railroad, he found out right enough what the war had been about.

“There is a power in Europe with which I cannot cope!” he reported on his return back here to the United States.

He didn’t, however, give it a racial designation!

You fellows were called up from farm and mine, and out of office and factory. The Sephardim, needing you to fight their battles and make certain that the Messrs. Rothschilds’ railroad was smashed, painted the Heinies as being next to human savages — precisely as the same poisonous propaganda is stating today, because Hitler cleaned up Germany and kicked all such Jewish burglars out — and you consented to be drafted and sent to camp as rookies.

You thought the United States was in horrid danger, or your “Democracy” was, and Georgie Cohan wrote Over There! and the regiments began to march down Fifth Avenue in New York, and pretty soon Blackjack Pershing announced that the first contingent of Yanks had landed in France.

How the Sephardic Jews of London must have smiled in smug satisfaction when they had put that one over on you! Reports came out from under cover after the war, in which they practically bragged that it cost Sephardic Great Britain something like 37 cents a head to convert you Americans into doing their battling against the German Ashkenazim for them!

You don’t need to get overly mad yet; there’s more coming. I haven’t finished yet telling you just what went on behind your backs while Mr. Barney Baruch was the real War Boss of the United States.

Had there only been a single purpose behind the World War, namely, the defeat of Rothschild Germany, the division of Europe and a part of Asia, and to secure for the Sephardic financiers the absolute control of commerce and finance, the war could not — and would not! — have lasted six months! But after it got nicely going, the Jews in both camps met up with a surprise.

They discovered the ease with which they could infiltrate their own people into official positions previously held inviolate to Gentiles!

Furthermore, on both sides they discovered the stupendous war profits that they could reap, while the Gentiles bought the bonds, did the fighting, and paid the bills.

They had stumbled onto the mightiest racket in all creation, and something like four millions of them were not slow to get over here into the United States during the four war years and take advantage of it from the American angle.

Jews on both sides, I say, discovered the titanic opportunity presented to them to make money, which in turn meant world power and prestige after the mighty spectacle was ended.

The Jews promoted that war as a business — just as today through all this Relief blither, they’re promoting the Depression as a business! No matter how many millions have to sacrifice and suffer! What of it? They’re only Gentiles!

Now get this, you boys who recall something of what France was like in wet weather, or what the front trenches were like the night of a barrage —

The question of the duration of the World War hinged upon the ability of Germany to obtain sufficient iron ore from which munitions could be manufactured. In May, 1915, in a confidential report, the six great industrial and agricultural associations of Germany advised Chancellor von Bethmann-Hollweg that “if the production of the Lorraine ore was disturbed, the war would be practically lost.”

Engerand, a member of the French Honse of Deputies, says that the German metallurgists had frequently declared that if the German ore mines had been attacked by the French army, “the war would have been finished in six months, with the defeat of Germany.”

In a heated debate in the French House of Deputies, after an investigation conducted by that law-making, body, it came out that the control of the war was in the hands of a few international Jewish families!

These families controlled most of the raw materials used in the manufacture of munitions. Furthermore, they controlled most of the factories making munitions. It appears further that they controlled both the civil governments and the military organizations of both Germany and France.

The French Deputy’s report said bluntly —

“Some of the most notable of these families are the deVendel family, the Thyssen family, the Krupp family, and above them all, the famous international family of the Rothschilds, who are Jews by religion and Barons of Germany, France, and Austria, by business! These ubiquitous families are so interspersed in the various countries that in some of them they are native-born citizens, in other countries they are naturalized citizens. Some of these citizens were found to be members of the governments of opposite warring countries!”

Isn’t it an ironical circumstance, little male children of the American Legion, that I’m telling you about these families and naming them to some of you for the first time, and yet for twenty months you worked for them in your ‘khaki’ uniforms and knew next to nothing about it! You thought you were working for Uncle Sam! The Jews put it over on you!

To speak bluntly, my lads, THEY PLAYED YOU FOR A CROWD OF SUCKERS!

Furthermore, I interrupt myself to tell you that they’re still playing you for a mob of suckers.

I know more than you do about ‘em, and before I get through I’ll convince you of it — provided you’re Gentile!

Can you still take it, or are you about ready at this point to throw my booklet aside and dismiss me with the execration that I must be a Nazi agent?

Anyhow, I haven’t come yet to the most insufferable part, by a long shot. You’d better stick with me. Maybe you’ll need a few facts to bring up in your next Legion meeting when somebody challenges the probability of the whole of it.

The principal iron mines, smelters, and coal mines of Germany and France, I tell you, were — and still are — located immediately on both sides of the pre-war political boundary line separating the two countries in the Lorraine section.

On the French side there is a very extensive ore section known as the Basin of Briey. In the same region there are extensive coal fields known as the Basin of Bruay.

These iron fields, iron mines, smelters, and coal mines were, before and during the world war, the private property of a few international families or a few international corporations. The deVendel family owned in one property some 25,000 acres of iron land, one-half of which was in German territory and the other half in French territory!

In another property, in the French Basin, the deVendel family, with the Creusot interests — the Krupps of France — owned eight blast furnaces and iron ore mines producing a million tons yearly. On the German side the deVendel family owned mining concessions at Meyeurre and Hayange producing three million tons of ore a year — with blast furnaces and smelters near those mines. In all, the deVendel family controlled about 200,000 acres of iron land in that section.

The Germans, on the other hand, owned eighteen mining concessions in the Briey and Longwy Basin and a few more in Normandy. The Thyssens controlled the mines of Bailly, Jouville and Souligny. The mines of Montlers were controlled by an international group — their stocks being divided: French, 100; German, 70; and Belgian 10.

The German “Phoenix” group — Hasper and Koesch — controlled the French mines at Jarny and Saucy. I could go on for a couple more pages, giving you the data on these ownerships. But you get the idea. And I think you grasp that I know what I’m talking about.

One day, before war was declared, the German army proceeded to seize the French Basin of Briey.

The French Government immediately ordered the French troops to withdraw eight miles from that section! 46

Thus the Germans occupied that important iron territory without the slightest resistance.

Was the war that you fellows were commanded to go and fight in the name of Democracy, a “set-up,” or was it not?

How many of you are aware that the “front” through the Basin of Briey was practically “quiet” throughout the whole war? It was said that not a single man had ever been killed there, until the American army began its drive there against the Germans!

You see, no one seemed to have told Blackjack Pershing that he and his Yanks had been hoaxed into a “set-up” war. He, and they, started to slam-bang in as though it were a regular war, really to save democracy.

The moment the Yanks started in to make a mess of Briey, the whole war collapsed. It would have collapsed six months after it began — and America never have been pulled into it at all — if the Jews hadn’t come to an agreement among themselves to keep it going because of the kale they were piling up, and because there were plenty of Gentiles to fight it!

In the Basin of Briey, about 25 miles behind the front, was the most important iron field from which the Germans dug the greater part of the ore used for their munitions. The German smelters were there, working day and night, preparing iron for ammunition destined to kill French soldiers and later, Americans!

How could Germans mine their fourteen million tons of iron ore 25 miles behind the front, and how could the Krupps manufacture munitions from that ore, if the French or English had bombarded those works and disturbed the peaceful operation of the smelters? Likewise, how could the French mine their 28,000 tons of coal per day, if the “Germans” had recklessly and discourteously bombarded those mines only ten to twelve miles behind the French lines?

The principal business of the international Jewish owners of those mines was to make money during the war! — Berlin-Bagdad Railroad or no Berlin-Bagdad Railroad.

If the Germans had been dislodged from the iron ore fields of Briey — according to the German metallurgists — “the war would have been finished with the defeat of Germany, within six months,” that is, by January 1, 1915. But if the war had come to a conclusion so swiftly, those international Yiddisher interests could not have made their millions, the Krupps could not have manufactured so much ammunition, and there would have been left several million Gentiles alive to oppose the aggressions of predatory Jews. During the war, however, business was business.

The German, English, French, and Belgian international Jewish families were bent on making money, reaping the rich harvest of Gentile dollars-and blood — that eleven years later was to produce the most gigantic international bankruptcy that the world has ever seen. What did they care about life, liberty, and happiness of Gentiles? Sure there were a few Jewish lads here and there in the war. But whenever did the big-shot Jews care much whether their own lower-bracket flesh-and-blood took a rap or two, if the more sizable interests of world Jewry were served?

The enormity of the situation was pointed out by Gustav Tery, editor of L’Ouevre, of Paris, on May 22, 1917. That was about the time we were coming into the “set-up,” remember? He declared that in the minutes of the general meeting, of the blast furnace and steel-mill corporation of Caen, held on March 14, 1916, “it is specified that the Thyssen (German branch of the family) interests, are carefully preserved in the new organization. It is understood that a part of the profits realized by this company in the making of war munitions (for France!) will be put aside for the Thyssen (German!) group, and that, after the war, automatically and legally, the Messrs. Thyssen will receive this large sum!

That’s the kind of a war that made you Legionnaires, my lads of the American Legion!

Need I do any arguing that it might have been the humane thing, as well as to the interests of the French people, to have had the Germans driven out of the Basin of Briey and thus established peace within six months of the war’s beginning? Had it been done, there never would have been any need for America to enter into the war at all. But I said that before! Indeed, General Sarrail of France reasoned somewhat after this fashion, he being a plain dumb Gentile general, and not initiated into the mysteries of the whole Jewish war at all. In 1914 he projected an offensive that, had it been successful, would have driven the Germans out of the Briey.

He was told by the French general staff that it was “too difficult” to maneuver in that district, although the Germans had found no trouble in advancing 14 kilometers in a mere two days!

To assure the tranquillity of the iron mines, so that the war could go on slaughtering Gentiles and eventually costing 50,000 American lives, the patriotic and uninitiated General Sarrail was removed from the command of that front and replaced by the more complaisant General Gerard.

What discourtesy it would have been, no matter how men were dying by the tens of thousands every day elsewhere, to disturb or dislodge the Germans from their peaceful mining of French iron ore!

It is only for the poor devils who have to go through the barrages and breathe the poison gas, that war is not a gentlemen’s agreement! Think it over!

In 1933, a buck private of the German army whose first name was Adolf came to the chancellorship of the German Fatherland and shoveled the whole mob of burglars, shysters, criminals, and blackguards out. I don’t believe in his type of government for the United States, but I’m not letting myself be bamboozled by all the poison-pen screeching that the Jews are doing in consequence — to the end and aim that we should go over a second time and help to dislodge him, that the deVendels, the Thyssens, the Krupps and the Rothschilds should be restored to power and be permitted to repeat.

That’s precisely what the big Sephardic Jew, Rossocampo-Rosenvelt, now sitting in the White House as of New Year’s Eve, 1938-39, is striving his best to have happen with all the official powers at his command!

And around him, thicker than flies about a honey-pot, sit the kith and kin of the same Ashkenazic Mob that only twenty-five years ago were paying ten grand to a Serbian kike to shoot an Archduke and precipitate the whole of it. Fine business, say I! And if I stick my head out and say I know a few things that the rest of America hasn’t yet learned, I’m a Nazi Spy, an agent of Hitler, a Jew-Baiter. I’m “anti-American” because I don’t want to see the growing boys of today shipped overseas to fight any more Ashkenazic-Sephardic fights in a wholesale bamboozlement!

The Jews made an ocean of spondulics out of that War. One report has it that out of 100 war profiteers listed in New York State, 75 of them were Jews. Maybe that’s because there are more Jews in York State in proportion to the population than in any other commonwealth. But no matter how much money they made, they sowed the seeds of a whirlwind.

The Central Powers — thanks to us American lads — were reasonably well-thrashed. At least they gave up. But Old Jake Schiff put up a million bucks to send Trotsky (Bronstein) to Russia to join Lenin and produce Bolshevism. The Treaty of London crystallized in practice into the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was stricken with a debt she had to repudiate. Austria and Hungary were first given over to Lenin’s thugs — and the Jew Bela Cohen went in and hamstrung five thousand Gentiles a week. The Red Jews got into Italy in the wake of war’s disintegration and the whole continent of Europe was headed for chaos — Yiddisher chaos!

Suddenly in Italy appeared Mussolini, and he put a halt to Communism. He introduced one-man Fascism because Yiddisher “democracy” doesn’t serve in such a turmoil. Out of Mussolini’s success grew Hitler’s.

Hitler knew the crowd that had wrecked the Fatherland, and he started a one-man war in Germany to best it — and drive it forth.

We know that he did drive it forth. He even went so far as to clap the sacrosanct person of one omnipotent Rothschild in a common hoosegow.

Over here into the United States swarmed the mob of mischief-making scoundrels, to use the Democratic Party, the American press and radio, the American movie screen, to work up a wild hysteria to have Hitler kicked to limbo.

And again we’re falling for paid propaganda and poison-pen bilge, to make us go to war to pull the Rothschild chestnuts out of the fire a second time.

We must do this, it seems, in the name of racial tolerance and religious freedom.

According to the Jewish Statistical Bureau there were only 4,228,029 Jews designated as residents of the United States in 1927, ten years after we entered the war. But in 1937, ten years later, the number had jumped to 12,046,648 — an increase of 8,818,639.

That’s an increase of 17,000 Jews a week in this country, every week for ten years!

Have they got any right here? Have they come in defiance of immigration quotas or have they not? Have our immigration quotas broken down? Or has our government been turned so far Yiddish that no restraints can be put upon this influx even if illegal?

Instead of you little male children of the American Legion getting together every other Friday under some Jewish war “veteran” and griping about the “un-American” growth of Nazism and “racial intolerance,” you’d better do a little scouring into what’s going on right under your noses, to make this the second kind of a Germany that Hitler had to dry-clean and fumigate after he landed in office!

Last Armistice Day I heard and saw a news-reel of American Legion Commander Chadwick on a platform before a mike at Arlington Cemetery, opening the mouth that’s in his face, and emitting a great belch of applesauce about this country’s having no room for any ism but Americanism!

What did he mean, Americanism?

Does Americanism consist of standing aside, with a sappy look on the face, and keeping the hands thrust in the pockets while a gang of international mobsters continue to make hash of Christian-Gentile institutions?

What does Americanism mean?

And what was Chadwick doing, but toadying to the same clique of international Yiddishers who once finagled not to have the Briey Basin bombed, so that their Gentile war could go according to Hoyle on all fronts but in the Jewish-industrial area?

The American Legion prides itself on advocating and fighting for Americanism. Very good, then; why doesn’t it get up on its hind legs and do a little fighting against the conniving Yiddisher who’s brought a whirlwind of cataclysm on the heads of universal Christendom?

I say that I’m challenging the American Legion! I’m challenging Commander Chadwick, making his stooge-speech for Americanism that he doesn’t define — and couldn’t define if he tried! He took a nasty poke at thousands of fine men in my own organization — men who aren’t bamboozled by Yiddisher propaganda and don’t go ’round playing the inside game of a people that gave Christian institutions a body-blow twenty years ago and are simply being called by Kismet to pay for it.

I want to know what he means by Americanism!

The men he heads were Duped by Judah twenty-odd years bygone.

Fifty thousand dead boys — good Americans! — are sleeping in graves overseas because the Rothschilds wanted to construct a railroad from Berlin down to Bagdad and the owners of the Bank of England stopped ‘em by wrecking the country they came from.

Is it Americanism to let the same mob come swarming over here and play eternal high jinks with this nation too?

If so, and Chadwick speaks for it officially, let the American Legion change its name to the Jewish War Veterans, en masse, and have done with bamboozlement.

Anyhow, I’ve given you fellows the cold hard, hitherto suppressed facts of precisely what started the War and dragged you into it, and gave you the basis for a Legion at all.

That War is now twenty-five years — a quarter-century — in retrospect. We’ve lived long enough, and had time enough, to view it in the abstract, to cool down from the hysterias of military tempo.

We went overseas — bought like the Gentile cattle that we were for 37 cents per head! — and stopped the German pig-iron that was smelted in France, that the world might be made safe for Yiddish Democracy.

Was it made safe for Democracy — anybody’s Democracy?

How could it be made safe for something that never existed, excepting in an elementary form in ancient Greece? Moreover, what business did we have fooling in the “protection of Democracy,” anyway, seeing that our United States isn’t a Democracy but a Republic?

If we had real Democracy in this country, it would mean the direct hour-to-hour rule of the majority. But instead of hour-to-hour rule of the majority we got hour-to-hour rule of a ten-percent mob of Jews — 275 of them in the highest key positions in our Federal government! — running the affairs of 120 million Gentiles!

There are, by admitted Yiddisher census, 12,046,649 Jews within our United States. That’s nearly ten percent of our entire population. And they supervise our press, they dictate our government, they shovel their smut out via radio and movie, then they get up on their hind legs and screech “racial intolerance” if a mere Gentile gets his back up and suggests that a country 90 percent Gentile ought to have federal, cultural, and political institutions that are free from the blight of the ethics of the Jewish 10 percent. [WDP's figures are a bit high here -- admin]

They don’t even believe in the American brand of Constitutionalism. They want their High Priest Kommissar Kommunism to be installed over here. Who’s opposed every legislative move to benefit the veterans? Jews! And Chadwick apparently works for ‘em!

When they failed to get Communism by Red Sit-Down striking, or crack-pot economics out of Washington, they try the stunt of screeching about America’s need for a swollen army and navy, and a War Resources Bill that creates a Five-Minister War Government, with the President as its head and four War Ministers (to be Big Jews of course!) about him, accountable to nobody but themselves.

I put it to you lads of the American Legion — have we all gone nuts?

Seven years ago knowing this sort of thing was coming, I turned my back on private enterprise good for twenty-five grand a year to my bank account — to launch the Silvershirts on a personal remuneration of one dollar a year.

I meant to create an organization throughout this nation that should actually do what the American Legion might do, or should be doing, if it didn’t raise the race question: See that the majority ruled in this country, not a 10 percent minority, and that patriotism comprised something other than marching through all the best downtown streets on Armistice Day and pasting membership posters on all the best billboards as the outdoor advertising companies donated space.

I wasn’t afraid of the race question. If a crowd of burglars moved into the nation, and everything they touched immediately developed — subversion, bankruptcy, and confusion, I didn’t propose to overlook the fact that they were burglars just because they were Jewish in race and religion.

If they were burglarizing the nation in the name of the Jewish race and religion, then I would treat with them in the name of the Jewish race and religion when it came to reprisals or punishments.

“We Jews have spoiled the blood of all the races,” says Dr. Munzer, a Jew, in his book The Way of Zion. “We have tarnished and broken their power. We have made everything foul, rotten, decomposed, and decayed.”

“You certainly have,” I was willing to agree, “but I’ll be hanged before I’ll let you make everything in the United States foul, rotten, decomposed, and decayed, if I have anything to say about it — and I flatter myself I can have quite a lot to say.”

So I’ve gotten out, over a seven-year period, and organized a crowd of virile Americans in twenty-two States that are now giving the Jewish Locust-Swarm and what from Europe the unmitigated jitters. My men don’t march up and down the best streets on Armistice Day, or paste posters on donated billboards, or pass resolutions against Communism in conventions and then offer their rostrums to the biggest Communists in the nation. My crowd is organized so that nobody but the leaders of their own Posts know who they are. But let trouble start anywhere in the nation — from a “purge” of the State Democratic parties of constitutional Americans, to another marine strike in Seattle or an attempted sabotage of industry by sit-down strikes in Michigan, Ohio, or Pennsylvania, and always up near the head of the vigilante leaders you find a Silvershirt or a knot of Silvershirts. My publishing house put out two million pieces of literature last year, exposing the whole pernicious, nation-wide, Yiddisher fanagglement. And I’m evidently so terribly right in my position, and the Silvershirts are scouring to such extent, that a public Silvershirt meeting announced for Chicago is equal to a public riot; thugs and gunmen paid by Jews wade into such meetings and begin sending men and women to hospitals. Peaceable and lawful meetings! The audiences respectable and information-hungry ladies and gentlemen! The subject-matter harangued from the platform, the necessity for keeping our Republic free of the foulness, rottenness, and decomposition that the Jew Munzer talks about! And without a word of warning the rioters come smashing in, bludgeoning all and sundry! And in the face of such thuggery and depredation, the German Bunders seem to be the only other organization in the nation not afraid to gang up and put in an oar to help halt it.

And what is the American Legion doing, while this sort of thing is in progress?

From where I sit, it’s organized to screech against both Silvershirts and German Bunders from public platforms, and call anybody who does anything patriotic besides parade on Armistice Day, un-American!

Maybe I’m wrong, but that’s how I see it!

The veterans of the Messrs. Rothschild’s Franco-German War or Ashkenazic-Sephardic War get together in Posts every other Tuesday, find their programs and resolutions all nicely laid out for ‘em, do precisely what their officers or rules committees tell ‘em, agree to hold a dance the first of the month and then go home. Once a year the national gang holds a convention somewhere that costs a lot of money to attend. The delegates listen to a lot of spellbinders who defend the Jews and damn the Silvershirts and German Bunders. In the evenings they get plastered and raise ‘ell. A week later the merchants take down the bunting and count the profits. The American Legion has held another convention. And it hasn’t meant a thing!

Witness the spectacle of the American Legion Convention in Chicago passing resolutions savagely denouncing Communism, a couple of years back, and then turning over its platform to the Jew, LaGuardia, from New York — who hates Communists about as bad as Franklin D. Roosevelt hates instructed New-Deal delegates. Any Silvershirt could have told the American Legionnaires that LaGuardia was practically elected by the Communist vote!

And yet it’s not to be wondered at.

You little male children of the American Legion were hoaxed, hoodwinked, and buffaloed into going over-seas and doing your part to stop the building of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad. You’re in the same pitiable plight now in being herded into the Legion so that the Messrs. Rothschild’s American agents can keep you on the job of protecting and championing God’s Chosen People, no matter what they do to your government or bank account.

A national mob of ex-soldiers, unorganized, is a dangerous element after a war in any nation — especially if someone starts telling ‘em the truth about which bunch of blackguards started the war and for what. But organize ‘em, tell ‘em in fancy-sounding phrases that they’re “a great force for patriotism,” and they don’t get out of hand and start settling accounts.

In other words, it keeps up the military discipline till it can be used again.

The poor duped veterans are ready to agree that they’re “a great force for patriotism,” and a little clever manipulation then fixes everything so they never come to demonstrate it.

When I call you Dupes of Judah, little male children of the American Legion, you needn’t get sore. Even in being “a great force for patriotism” — without ever doing anything about it but march and pass resolutions — you’re Dupes of Judah. Even in the Legion fulminations that will surely raise against me for writing and circulating, this book, you’re Dupes of Judah.

The Jews had you right where they wanted you in 1917, and used you to stop the Ashkenazic pig-iron and sniff the gas, that you might halt an unwanted railroad from being built. The Jews have you right where they want you in 1939, and are using you to stop an anti-Semitic Silvershirt organization from being built, merely because the question of race is involved. Jews and their acts are inviolate against criticism or attack, it seems, and anyone or anything that brings their race in question is “un-American”!

A few odd-thousand jewish boys went to the war because they were drafted and couldn’t help it, or they grabbed off desk-jobs in Washington that gave ‘em excuse to put on uniforms. Now when the leaders of their race are openly bragging about what Jews as a race are succeeding in doing to constitutional government and Christian institutions, no Gentile ex-soldier is supposed to say or do anything about it. He had Jew buddies in the war with him! That puts the whole American Legion out of the running — to do anything against the predatory and gloating Israelite — at a stroke. Clever business, what?

When the Armistice was signed, I was two thousand versts out on the wastes of wintry Siberia with the thermometer at forty below, my only protection from the killing blasts an army uniform and a rough corset of dispatches around my waist. I not only saw the War. I saw Communism come into the country with my own eyesight. When I got home, I made up my mind that it wasn’t going to blight my United States.

So! For personally determining that Communism wasn’t going to blight the United States, and doing something more about it than march up and down on the 11th of November, or paste posters of Grecian ladies on billboards, I’ve been probed twice by Congress. I’ve been attacked by the Red La Follette Committee in the Senate — and given it a shellacking! — and my men did more than any other single agency in seeing that Rossocampo’s “purge” went sour across a group of strategic States. Martin Dies — with Jews around him thicker than mosquitoes in New Jersey at sundown — gave it out the other day that “Silvershirts are becoming so formidable in this nation, that in one Pennsylvania district they practically pre-dominate!”

I’m not meaning to brag in recounting these items. I’m calling your attention to the fact that if the American Legion were something other than a Jew-muzzled organization subtly steered so as to defend and champion the nation’s despoilers, there wouldn’t be any need for Silvershirts and they never would have appeared.

Name one thing that the American Legion has been allowed to do since its formation, to dynamite this sabotage of American government and morals — aside from passing resolutions against Communism and fulminating against Silvershirts and Bunders as “un-American.”

A tree is known by its fruits. Christ said that, a long time ago. But Christ doesn’t seem to be overly popular with American Legion Posts since the Jews took over — excepting as a mouth-filling cuss word. How many times have you heard Christ’s name invoked in Legion Post meetings? The name of “God,” yes! God, according to all the best Bibles, is very, very Jewish. But Christ was such a Jew-Baiter that they dragged Him off and killed Him. If you think that such deletions come about by accident, you’re crazy.

There are plenty of bowels in the American Legion — just as there were plenty of bowels in the AEF that sailed to France. But the Jewish War Veterans, the koonlobers, the Jew-kept press, and the smart Yiddisher boys everywhere pushing in as Post commanders and officers, don’t give ‘em much chance to function unless it’s to push into some sort of liquid fire and rake out chestnuts with a neat little six-pointed star branded upon each.

And with many thousands of Jews let into the country every week since 1914, and a Sanhedrin in the White House piling up a 40 billion dollar national debt, Chadwick gets up at Arlington and prates over a Yiddisher radio network that there’s no room in this country for anything but “Americanism.”

In God’s name, what’s the man talking about?

Up in Washington the week that I’m writing these lines, a new Congress is meeting. Some say it’s the last Congress that is ever going to meet, but the vigorously pro-Jewish American Legion probably wouldn’t know anything about that! Anyhow, in that Congress the relatives, progeny, or stooges of the same kosher mob that ordered us to risk our lives to stop the building of the Berlin-Bagdad Railroad — and wouldn’t let the Briey Basin be bombed until we’d been pulled into the brawl — are introducing two Bills. One is H.R. 9604. The other is S. 1248.

Both of these Bills represent legislation that would do on a wholesale scale in the next Yiddish war what was attempted only on a piker scale in 1917.

Instead of conscripting a few buck privates to go over and wreck Germany so that the Rothschilds couldn’t complete their railroad, the Yiddishers now propose to fight the war all over again by conscripting the whole nation!

Of course they’ve camouflaged these Bills under a lot of bologna-phrases, such as “taking the profits out of war,” just as they camouflaged the 1917 conscription under the bologna-phrase “making the world safe for Democracy.”

Give the Gentiles a good bologna-phrase, and they seem to be willing to do whatever the Yiddishers want, even to die as happy as possible.

Down deep under all the applesauce and skulduggery, however, here’s the stark low-down on what’s happening —

Communism by open revolution in this nation is proving an expensive bust to the big banking Jews who’ve been seeing it got the kale. The pendulum of popularity has commenced to swing away from Rossocampo-Rosenvelt and gives every indication of going out like a light. Something must be hatched up between eleven o’clock and lunch to keep the Jews in control who’ve weaseled into Federal government since the start of this Depression.

The expedient is a coast-to-coast screech about the terrible State of the national defense, and how utterly unprepared the United States is for another war, in the event that Rossocampo and his Yiddishers can get one provoked with either Germany or Japan.

It’s the Old Army Game all over again, little male children of the American Legion: Never give the suckers an even break!

So the Jew-kept press and radio are going to town on what terrible people the Nazis and Japanese are, because Judah has had her clutch smashed on control of both of those countries. And with a “national emergency” in sight — just like the “inevitable” war that finally came to pass in 1914 — the Congress must lay the cornerstones for the sort of War Government the Jews want here, by legislation.

They’ve prepared two Bills for the attention of the present Congress. One is Senate Bill 1248. The other is House Bill 9604. Both of these appear on the surface to be measures to more effectively organize the country in time of war by mobilizing all the nation’s resources under a general Conscription Act. In the event of another war, everybody and everything are going to be conscripted — men and women, old and young alike. But that’s not the worst of it. They’re going to set up a lot of those alphabetical bureaus, and at the head of each one is going to be a Chairman. These Chairmen are going to be accountable not to Congress or the people but to the President. He, with the heads of four of these bureaus, is going to run the war. And there is nothing in the Act which makes him accountable to ANYBODY!

During the run of a war “or a national emergency” this five-man board is to be the government! It is going to be known as the War Ministry Government. The Constitution makes no provision for any such hocus-pocus, Congress has no authority to put such legislation on the statute books. All the same, they’re going ahead and will try to put it over. And the measure that thus abolishes Constitutionalism during such a war is commonly known as the War Resources Act.

Now this War Resources Bill — or Bills — means vicious mischief!

It is the NRA introduced all over again, only lifted above all chance of unconstitutionality because it appears concerned with the national defense, It provides not only for the creation of a super War Cabinet to run the country, but for the country’s actual supervision by five great economic agencies, each having the word “War” so concerned in its title, that it cannot be attacked without the critic’s appearing to agitate seditiously against the nation’s military or laying himself open to a charge of being in the pay of America’s enemies.

The first of these new bureaucracies is to be called the War Labor Administration.

The avowed purpose of WLA is to “insure” maintenance and distribution of war labor, skilled or un-skilled, as industry may require. Believe it or not, no private citizen nor even his representative in the House or Senate, has the slightest “say” as to what shall be done with his person or his labor, the moment the nation has once declared war. Congress relinquishes. Constitutional rights go by the board. The super War Cabinet Kommissars — the Baruchs of the nation — take charge of everyone and everything, and the slightest disobedience to fiat or arbitrary ruling means that the recalcitrant or hostile citizen is locked in prison at once.

To insure proper supplies of war materials, civilian food requirements for all conscripted Gentile citizens, the War Trade Administration is to be the second great bureaucracy, conducting industrial mobilization and superintending transportation.

The moment that the powerful Jews at the head of our government have forced a war with some foreign power — probably Japan — all private rights in businesses throughout the nation abruptly cease to exist. The nation automatically becomes one vast corporate State, under sterner regulation than anything devised by Mussolini or Hitler. Under excuse that such methods are necessary to prosecute the war, private ownership and management are to be abolished as archaic; managers are to be shipped and trafficked around at the pleasure of the War Ministers — and presumably the same Jews now carrying on such radicalisms as NLRB and other Soviet agencies, are to take full command of all Gentile firms and corporations.

During the pursuance of such a war as present propaganda is expected to bring about, all commercial business expansion will come to a halt. No corporation can issue securities that amount to more than $100,000 without the consent of the third great bureau to be set up under the War Resources Bill, to be called the War Finance Control Committee.

Of course, whoever controlled WFCC would not only control the finances of the nation, but likewise control the successful outcome of the war.

Such a war, under such a control, could not be fought as we fought the World War; for there is no longer any great cache of personal wealth in the nation to be brought out of hiding by the sale of war bonds. Money for such a war would have to be raised by the same “sales” of bonds that have been keeping the New Deal alive — taking the last capital remaining in the hands of banks, and giving them beautifully lithographed paper in return, or issuing fiat currency which in the history of every government has meant ruinous inflation.

During the last war it was not generally known that Paul M. Warburg was the great Jew alleged to be surveillance officer in the White House for Jewry, that Felix Warburg was the Jewish big shot on the War Finance Board, while at the same time, Max Warburg, the blood brother of these two, was reputed to be head executive of the German espionage system! In the event of another war, it is asking too much for wise Gentiles to believe that under the War Resources Bill there would be no repetitions of such Yiddish family high jinks.

The fourth provision for successful Yiddish Sovietism in the name of national defense under the War Resources Bill, would be the Advisory Defense Council. This would be a super-cabinet made up of the heads of the foregoing three agencies, responsible only to our Sephardic-Jewish President, and acting independently of his present official cabinet.

The Secretary of War as provided by custom and constitutional procedure, the military committees of the Congress, all the usual bodies which have enabled us to fight successfully every war in which our nation has engaged, would be automatically emasculated or tossed into discard by this new scheme which the Jews would now impose on our nation.

Finally a Price Control Commission would be established — also responsible only to the President — with blanket instructions to maintain the price levels of commodities as they have existed for twenty years preceding the war.

Thus all laws of supply and demand would go by the Board and we should have price by fiat.

This Price Control Commission is to fix the price of any commodity anywhere, and be responsible to no one but the President.

Now get the joker in the whole of it —

Under this War Resources Act, and during the prosecution of the war, the President could “requisition, take possession, regulate, limit, license, or prohibit, the purchase or sale, the use, importation or exportation, transportation, manufacture or distribution of any product, foodstuff, material, commodity, real estate or right.”

Get that last! … any real estate or right!

The wording of this particular clause makes it congressionally legal to close down all newspapers that might in any way disapprove of what the WRA happened to be doing to — or with — the country or its defense, prohibit the “right” of free speech or peaceable public assembly, trial by jury for offenses allegedly committed against the Act, and place the entire nation in the arbitrary hands of five men — Rossocampo-Rosenvelt at the head of them!

Nothing is said in the Bill, by the way, about restoring such real estate or rights. The government has the power to take them away, and there this Bill leaves the matter dangling!

Another Bill that is supposed to go along with the War Resources Bill is one for so-called Industrial Management. It is arbitrary and curt. It simply requires every person in industry to register with the government so he can be brought into the government if and when needed.

A Bureau of Women and Minors, will be created among the hundreds of new bureaus. It will assume jurisdiction over the 10 million women and children now estimated to be working in industry, commerce and the professions. Those whom the head war kommissars specified, would be recruited into the munitions and essential industries, to take the place of men, from the start.

Everything in the War Resources Bill, in short, is precisely of the structure and pattern that for the past twenty years have been the design of the totalitarian-Communist-Soviet State in Bolshevia!

Now WE must have it in the name of Defense!

Is it any wonder that with all this war-time Sovietism proposed, and rendered sacrosanct by its tie-up with the nation’s military, the Silver Legion thunders a warning across this country that any measure so inimical to constitutional government — even constitutional government in time of war — must not be passed “in a handful of hours,” and if humanly possible, not passed at all!

The whole scheme, according to well-informed persons at the nation’s Capital, is accredited as having been hatched in the fertile brain of Bernard M. Baruch.

It is being whipped into shape by Administration Jews.

In the event that it is actualized during the balance of Franklin Roosevelt’s term, it will be executed by Jews — and Jews of the type who believe that naught but Sovietism is the form of government under which Jews in America can feel themselves safe.

The pernicious side of this atrocious and far-reaching legislation is indicated by the secrecy and silence with which it is being treated in the press. No legislators are openly discussing it. No articles are appearing upon it in our national periodicals. Everything is being shaped up for the absolute dictatorship of Rossocampo-Rosenvelt — and his compatriots — in the name of the sacred cow of Public Protection.

He who declaims against the NVRA — so one might deduce — declaims against the continuity of America as a nation, prepared to defend herself against her world enemies.

What is being finagled, if such legislation is enacted into law, is, that everybody in the government, below the President and including both Houses of the Congress, is being legislated from official status the moment a conflict shall have been provoked with any nation.

Every Congressman and Senator, every federal official and department head with the exception of the President, is being legislated out of his job, back into the status of a private — and conscripted-citizen, till peace has been declared. The War Cabinet manages everything. And even so, there is no more assurance that the President-Dictator and the War Cabinet would relinquish after peace had been declared, than we now have assurance that the various Jewish bureaus set up in Washington will ever relinquish until made to do so by civilian force!

What is being attempted, under H. R. 9604, if it actually is rushed through Congress in a matter of hours, is a piece of legislation that promptly and effectively abolishes constitutional government which has maintained in this country for 150 years.

Probable war is merely the excuse!

Is anyone so gullible as to expect that during the progress of such war, such a Soviet kommissariat wouldn’t bring about conditions under which resumption of a constitutional republic could only be effected by the expedients of General Franco’s forces in Spain?

I declare that all of it is a supreme piece of Yiddish cunning to effect an NRA that no Supreme Court can invalidate.

It is the supreme effort of the secret world Jewish government, to bring the Gentiles of the United States under its control so that they never escape without enduring Russia’s agonies.

And Democrats and Republicans alike, in the current Congress, are going to be asked to get together, “For the unbiased good of the nation,” and make the final suicide of constitutional government effective.

The press, signing its own death warrant by keeping quiet on the whole of it, is treating the matter as though H.R. 9604 were a bit of legislation to pay off old soldiers in Oshkosh and Keokuk.

So far, since H.R. 9604 first gained notice at the Capital in any status whatsoever, nobody has called attention to the fact that we already possess federal agencies and enactments on the statute books to take care of every emergency which another war might bring.

Our system of a Secretary of War and a Secretary of the Navy, with the appropriate committees on the military in the Congress, has functioned without flaw in every war in which our country has engaged.

Americans do not require to be bossed or shipped around like cattle merely because there is likelihood of the Jews’ embroiling us in conflict with Germany, Japan, or some other country that has successfully halted Communism. There is plenty of patriotism left to fight our battles successfully if our country’s plight be real.

Regimentation of a nation, even in war-time, still is regimentation!

The question before the American people is: Are we going to let the Jews succeed in this last stupendous trickery, or are we going to FIGHT? Think it over, little male children of the American Legion! But don’t take too much time.

Congress met on January 2nd, and WRA is to be enacted into law as quickly as can be finagled!

Now then, I put the challenge openly, bluntly, and angrily: If the American Legion is “a great force for patriotism,” what does it propose to do about seeing that all this Yiddisher hocus-pocus is ended, these War-Ministry Bills consigned to limbo, and the country itself purged of the Gang that’s almost wrecked it?

I’m plenty sore about this thing. I know slathers of fine lads, even right in the American Legion at present, who are plenty sore about it also.

But what are we going to DO about it?

The American Legion is not supposed to “mess in politics” … that’s another laugh! … but it is supposed to do something besides parade and paste things on billboards when the national integrity of the country is at stake!

Sooner or later one of three things has got to happen to the American Legion: Either it yanks the Yiddish halter off its neck and starts herding Yiddishers back on the boats for Europe, or it comes out openly as Judah’s defense army of Rothschild-War veterans, or it disbands and goes home! There’s no need to raise the controversy about the surreptitious story that the American Legion was founded on koonlobe money at Indianapolis in the beginning; when the American branch of the House of Rothschild make donations like that, they never keep minutes of the meetings with the Boys in the Back-room. Like the authenticity of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, the truth or falsity of ‘em has to be demonstrated by whether or not they are put into practice. To date, the American Legion, through its commanders and its Posts, has never lifted a split thumb to put the blame for either Communism or New-Dealism where it belongs. Individually, thousands of you lads have griped day by day that there’s too many “kikes” running things; but saying so as a Legionnaire, or forcing the Legion to demand a show-down on it from Congress, is one of those things that you don’t do.

Why not?

“The Legion isn’t organized for that sort of thing,” is the asinine alibi.

Well, will some human gazebo in his right mind tell me just what the American Legion is organized for, justifying its existence? What does it get you men, to belong to it? Hasn’t the time arrived when you as Legionnaires should stand up and “speak your piece”? Haven’t you as veterans been booted around by those big Washington Yiddishers about long enough?

Remember, after you’d fought the war and earned your bonus, it was Mr. Barney Baruch — big-shot Jew “who had more power in the war than any other individual” — who most actively opposed paying it.

You’ve been treated as scum by the Yiddishers right straight along, and yet you go on working for ‘em and defending ‘em. So what!

I saw just as much service, day for day, in the Rothschild-Berlin-Bagdad Railroad War as any of you. And I’m not ranting all this to make myself a big-shot. But I’ve made it my business to dig down to hardpan and find out what this bankruptcy and sabotage of our country are all about.

If I’ve made it sound in this booklet, that I’ve been patronizing you, forget it! I’ve been trying to put this big subject in language strong enough to make you fighting mad, so that you’ll go forth and do something about it. Go into your next Legion Post meeting and raise ‘ell about it! Raise ‘ell about the Jews! … Well, why not? Aren’t they raising ‘ell with you?

They’re trying to make the United States of America their personal Jewtopia (Jew-Utopia), their new Land of Canaan, overflowing with milk and honey.

Are we going to be saps enough to let ‘em get away with it?

Now go ahead and do one of two things: Make a big fuss over this Jew Crowd and start ‘em moving out! Or obey the orders of the smart little Jew boy who’s got himself a big position in your Post, and let out a roar that what I’ve told you as an honest American — straight from the shoulder — is “Nazi propaganda” and ought to be suppressed!

It’s one thing or the other!

Take your choice!

——————————————————————————–

 
Article Source: jrbooksonline.com

 
The Origins of World War II

The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events

Just consider the following:

• Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying “Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”. (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).
• Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says “Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.” (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)
• Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, “the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.” (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).
• Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).

Is all of this merely attributable to antisemitism?

The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.

At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H Nicholson Peacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that ‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.’ (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).

As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.

According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):

‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions.. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.. The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press – all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed – and lavishly displayed – by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.’

Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?

Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the “Jewish Question”) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, ‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’ But she adds ‘Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their “race”.. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..’ etc etc.

Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. ‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein – they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’ (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).

Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes ‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’

Mowrer says ‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’ (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds ‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’ (pp. 144-5).

Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: ‘I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word “Jew”, in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’ (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed’s book Disgrace Abounding of the following year he notes ‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’ (pp238-9).

The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes ‘For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish.’ (Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984) p58.

To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Palestine (1984) pp272-277) According to Black, ‘The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany was Samuel Untermeyer.’ (p 369). This was the culmination of a worldwide boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah Arendt Eichmann in Jerusalem p 7).

Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia’s population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8):

‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.

‘To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’ Other authors agree with this:

“There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.” (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).

“The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s… Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in ‘nice society’, and ‘nice society’ included the universities.” (Martin Bernal, Black Athena vol. 1 pp. 367, 387).

“The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler’s) anti-Semitic beliefs.” (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).

Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, “The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all” (p.267), and “Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership” (p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist ‘who took advantages whenever they offered themselves’ (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

“He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the catholic Church – saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..” (p 200).

According to Liddell Hart, “At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing tospur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia” (p140).

David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to “the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.”

This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.

E-mail comment received:

I worked and studied in Berlin for three years, have an MA in International Relations and a BA in Government with a minor in History. I am embarrassed to say that until I read this article, I had no idea of the scope and cause for the anti-Semitism in Germany before WWII. The Halt Order at Dunkirk was never mentioned in my studies, nor was the ownership of the media, banks and businesses.

Thank you for the excellent article. It certainly gives me a new perspective. I have always questioned the actual numbers of Jewish victims of the concentration camps, as the numbers didn’t make sense based upon Germany’s population. Perhaps it was fear of failing or being labeled an anti-Semite by my history professors (all but two were Jewish) and classmates that I refrained from demanding an honest discussion during my classes. I once said that the only reason Israel existed was out of Holocaust guilt, and I was immediately labeled a terrorist sympathizer.

I see what is now happening in Israel and I am aghast. The parallels to WW II are frightening. Even today, one cannot bring up this subject without being labeled a Holocaust denier or white supremacist.

Thanks again for an excellent article. I am forwarding it to several friends.

JBP

 
Article Source: News From The West

By Israel Shamir

In the art of surveillance, there is a cunning ploy, familiar to the readers of Le Carre: the target is followed by a clumsy gumshoe; he discovers he is being tailed, easily shakes the tail off and goes on, feeling secure and unobserved. Unbeknownst to him, there are other detectives who stick to him like glue and follow him to his perdition. Professionally it is called a “double tail”.

Apparently, some of us were duped by such a ruse in the peculiar affair of a Zionist plot to infiltrate Wikipedia. This powerful online encyclopaedia is ostensibly free and open: everyone can be an editor, add or edit any entry. Editors remain anonymous; their true identity is hidden behind a nickname. This rule has a serious drawback: using this anonymity, a dedicated group may infiltrate the system by stealth, distort reality and create a false picture of the world in the eyes of billions. Apparently this script has been recently enacted.

Conspiracy? Yes. Jewish conspiracy? You bet! The damning email exchange was intercepted and published, revealing a radical Zionist plot to bend “Wiki.” A moderate leftist (some would call it ‘tame’) US-based pro-Palestinian site EI revealed that the radical-extremist Zionist organisation CAMERA called for “volunteers who can work as ‘editors’ to ensure” that Israel-related articles on Wikipedia agree with their right-wing-Zionist agenda. This effort was to be kept secret from the media and the public. Stealth and misrepresentation were presented as the keys to success. A CAMERA official advised the volunteers to sign up as editors for Wikipedia and afterwards to avoid editing Israel-related material for a while, in order to “avoid the appearance of being one-topic editors”. The orchestrated effort was to appear as if it were the work of unaffiliated individuals, and for this reason the editors were to avoid picking a user name that marked them as pro-Israel, or that let people know their real name. The emails taught Zionist apprentices how to act in the interests of Israel while using neutral language. The emphasis was on the long run side of the operation: “This is a marathon not a sprint”, a Zionist instructor nicknamed ‘Zeq’ taught his apprentices in the email exchange.

The EI article about this revelation was quite sycophantic towards Wikipedia. It presented Wiki as an objective source at loggerheads with Zionist infiltrators, and even bordered on advertising: “Openness and good faith are among Wikipedia’s core principles. Any person in the world can write or edit articles, but Wikipedia has strict guidelines and procedures for accountability intended to ensure quality control and prevent vandalism, plagiarism or distortion. It is because of these safeguards that articles on key elements of the Palestine-Israel conflict have generally remained well-referenced, useful and objective.”

Still, it was not enough, and on the next day, 22 April 2008, EI updated this article with a triumphal and calming statement: “a plan by the pro-Israel pressure group CAMERA to skew Wikipedia in a pro-Israel direction appears to have collapsed after it was exposed by EI”. Zeq was dismissed, and anyway, fewer than a dozen of Camera moles were active at the time EI exposed the scheme. In short: everything is fine, Wiki is functioning well, and the Zionist scare is gone, thanks to fearless EI. And anyway, it was only a small operation by the enemies of freedom, and it is over.

Excuse me, is this an article, or a paid advertisement for Wikipedia? Did EI receive on evening April 21st an offer they could not refuse from the owner of Wiki? Only a Zionist can think that Wiki “articles on key elements of the Palestine-Israel conflict have generally remained well-referenced, useful and objective.” On the contrary, they are biased in the extreme; just read, for instance, an exceedingly hostile entry on Hamas, including its Talk, i.e. discussions of editors, deletions and corrections. It defines Hamas as “… best known for multiple suicide bombings and other attacks directed against civilians [known to whom? To me it is best known as the ruling party of Palestine, and secondly, as grassroots mutual assistance movement – ISH]… Hamas’ charter calls for the destruction of the State of Israel [while all prominent Israeli parties joined in destruction of Palestine – ISH] … the organization is described by many as antisemitic.” Is that objective? Further the entry says, inter alia: Hamas is considered by the US a terrorist organisation. This is true, but not the whole truth. I personally added: However, Russia refused to consider Hamas a terrorist organisation. My addition was immediately removed by ever-watchful Zionist case-officer. Hamas is terrorist, full stop.

Only a dishonest fool, or a man who never used Wikipedia, may think that plan of the Lobby “to skew Wikipedia in a pro-Israel direction appears to have collapsed”. The clumsy gumshoe was shaken off, for Camera is but a bunch of amateurs, extreme Jewish nationalists with some nuisance value. They do not represent the Jewish mainstream; but they do play a useful part: they make the mainstream appear moderate. Being hassled by Camera is like being hassled by the Klan – it proves nothing. They hassle everybody, even moderate Zionists and other fellow-philosemites whom Camera fanatics consider insufficiently zealous, such as Johann Hari, an English professional philosemite who recently boasted: “I have worked undercover at both the Finsbury Park mosque and among neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers to expose the Jew-hatred there; I went on the Islam Channel to challenge the anti-Semitism of Islamists, I received a rash of death threats calling me ‘a Jew-lover’’. Later he strayed farther afield and wrote about Israeli sewage pouring all over Gaza. Afterwards, he complained, “Camera said I am an anti-Jewish bigot akin to Joseph Goebbels.”

Now, when the amateurs are disgraced and gone, the professionals remain. Wiki is as partial to Jews as the Jewish Chronicle. The picture of the world it offers is being edited and shaped in full accordance with general Jewish world view thanks to a group of permanent and devoted editors and arbiters.

Freedom to add and edit is just a bait attracting millions unpaid contributors. If Wiki were truly free, provided that “ordinary people’ are in vast majority, we could expect to find a democratic world view, not one not perverted by a biased minority, but the real Wikipedia does not work that way. The apparent chaos of Wiki is strictly controlled by a hierarchy of Agents Smith, who secure the Wiki matrix. They delete references to Jewish misdeeds, but emphasize every good deed by a Jew. Israel/Palestine is just one area in what is truly universal agenda. For instance, they block and remove attempts to mention the Jewish origin of the founder of Satanist movement, one La Vey (originally Levy), though this explains his hatred towards Christianity.  They insist on inferiority of Poincare versus Einstein, of Jung versus Freud or Proudhon versus Marx. Every act against Jews is recorded; every act of Jews against goyim is blotted out from this organised memory of our generation. These editors can manage just fine, thank you, without amateur infiltrators.

Zeq has been banned for his indiscretions, but the man he wrote of so admiringly, whom he described as their role model to his apprentices (“work with him and learn from him”), an ideal,. effective Zionist Wikipedia editor called Jayjg, is still there. Jayjg is not just an editor; he is an arbiter, what passes for a judge on the Wikipedia. He was appointed to that position by the site owner himself. He is an Agent Smith of the Wiki matrix. One may see his work in many, many entries: clever and unscrupulous, he is a master of the subterfuge and deceit.

Another, superior Agent Smith is Cberlet or John Foster (Chip) Berlet, the scourge of the web. He is acting under many names. He is a collaborator with the ADL, the Jewish thought police. Though he previously denied having any relationship to ADL, he admitted to Israeli Foreign Affairs that he “had had quite a cordial professional relationship with the ADL” and “had been doing research in cooperation with ADL”. The New York City Jewish newspaper “Forward” reported that Berlet transferred information from FBI anti-Communist informer directly to ADL. Ace Hayes wrote: “John Foster “Chip” Berlet has been involved, over the past half decade, in attacking virtually every independent critic of the Imperial State that the reader can name.” His operation is financed by Ford Foundation. Michael Collins Piper in his monumental book on the Kennedy assassination, Final Judgment, asserts that Chip Berlet is a CIA agent. Naturally, his own entry in Wiki is protected from editing. The Arbitration committee (those who hold the reigns of power on the Wiki) “admit to hero-worship of Cberlet’, as I was informed by a prominent insider.

These men are discreet, they won’t babble about their devotion to the Jewish cause; they hide it under the veil of bureaucratic expressions and abbreviations. Their supporting cast includes some Jewish “antizionists” like RolandR. This is actually a British Trotskyite trade union apparatchik Roland Rance, who does not mind to cooperate with convinced anti-Communist, CIA and ADL agent Berlet and with zealous Zionist Jayjg. So much for his antizionism and his socialism! He,  and thousands of smaller wanna-be Agents Smith did not need the starry-eyed arch-Zionists of CAMERA, they are already in.

The “revelation” of EI is nothing but a subterfuge, a “double tail” executed to increase our trust in Wiki. A similar “double tail” operation was performed last year, when Wiki announced it had found CIA-made edits on a few pages. Careful reading of that “revelation” was even more disappointing than that of EI. The worst discovered CIA edit of President Ahmadinejad entry was ‘added exclamation “Wahhhhhh!”, while “other changes that have been made are more innocuous, and include tweaks to the profile of former CIA chief Porter Goss and celebrities such as Oprah Winfrey.” This is ridiculous: the US secret services spend many billions per annum in their drive for domination of the Web. A recent report speaks of $30 billion allocated by the Pentagon for an “electronic Manhattan Project” in order to fight the Web. And they want us to believe that all these billions produced an exclamation “Wahhhhhh!”? Alas, it is just another “double tail” sting by the usual suspects.

The Wiki entries on Palestine/Israel are far from “well-referenced, useful and objective” as the dupes of EI claim. On the second thought, are they dupes, or willing collaborators? The top man in EI is Electronic Ali, as Ali Abunima is nicknamed, the man who began the witch hunt against “Shamir the antisemite”. He is the Arab front for various exclusively Jewish organisations for Palestine, who rather promote the Jewish cause and fight antisemitism. Such Jewish bodies like to have a compliant shabbesgoy (as Rosa Luxemburg called these guys) for a front, and Ali fits the bill perfectly. Even this article on Wiki has some reference to ‘evil antisemites’.

In his attack on me, Electronic Ali acted together with the execrable Hussein Ibish, but since then, the thieves have fallen apart.[1] Another prominent EI person is, or was, Nigel Parry, a British antisemitism-fighter, their webmaster and probably also their case officer. Nigel Perry is an enforcer of Political Correctness and is Gatekeeper General of the permitted discourse on Palestine, keeping it between hard Likud and the soft Peace Now. He proudly mentions many years of involvement with the Palestinian cause. Well, such guys are a reason why the Palestinian cause looks the way it does.

Why, we could have One State, a single unified state in Israel/Palestine by now, but for these guys. Looking back, it was a possible development in 2001, sometime before 9/11, when my call for One State was heeded by many Israelis and Americans, and supported by major American newspapers. Then these men began their campaign to denigrate me and scared the supporters away. “Shamir is discredited and marginalised”, they wrote with satisfaction. For them, it did not matter that together with me, they discredited and marginalised the idea of One State — the only possible peaceful solution to our conflict.

The final battle was fought on the Wikipedia site, where Ali-Ibish-Parry provided ammunition to Zionist Agent Smith Jayjg and ADL’s own Barlet, with the ADL-sponsored block of “antifascist” e-zines: British Searchlight, Norwegian Monitor, Swedish Expo, American Trotskyite Socialist Viewpoint et al. These formidable forces were counteracted by our wonderful friend Joh Domingo, a South African fighter against apartheid, and our French friend Omnivore. You can read the protocols of the battle on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Israel_Shamir. They decided to make me a Swedish neonazi impostor, instead of the Israeli writer I am.

All the time this battle was going on, I lived in my Jaffa house, receiving endless visitors, giving numerous interviews, going to work, seeing people – but I might as well have been dead. I felt like Doc Daneeka, a character in Joseph Heller’s witty Catch-22, who was declared dead as the plane he was supposed to fly was downed. “I am alive!” he shouted. “Here we have a paper saying you are dead”, they replied. His wife “inherited” his property, he was stricken from the lists, they stopped serving him food, and even his friends and comrades looked askance when he appeared. This is the power of an official-looking document – or a webpage blue with hyperlinks. Thus I have learned the dreadful power of an encyclopaedia: it does not reflect the world, but rather creates the world. Wiki is linked to thousands of sites; whether you look at answers.com or at an Arab English-language site, you’ll be led to Wiki with its lies.

If an encyclopaedia said I am a Swedish neonazi antisemite, nothing could change it. I could scream all day long: “Look, here I am, in Jaffa” but they would reply: “Here we have an official paper saying that you are not”. I am very grateful to Joh Domingo for his superhuman efforts, but he could not overcome the Agents Smith. Neither could I. If tomorrow they decide to make you a little green man from Mars, they will succeed, too. And then, even your friends will look behind you for your flying saucer.

A few days ago, I spoke to a group of Indian intellectuals in Delhi, and afterwards I received this touching letter from Come Carpentier, a French expat writer living in the Indian capital. He wrote: “I meant to thank you for these enlightening, balanced and always objective yet passionate words you spoke that evening…Listening to them dispels even better than reading you the reputation that you have been given by you-know-who as a firebrand defamer of Israel, holocaust denier, Nazi apologist and so on and so forth… Not to mention the rumours about your being a clandestine Swedish Far Right-winger infiltrated in the Holy Land by the international Islamo-Fascist Cabal!”

In a way, pro-Jewish bias of Wiki is unavoidable bearing in mind Jewish positions in Western discourse, media and universities. Jews – even people of Jewish origin – are likely to correct discourse in a flattering for them way. They did it hundred years ago, and five hundred years ago. Provided they do it in one direction, they constitute the only entity (besides the undermined Church and its Orders) capable of a marathon (in words of Zeq) – of sustaining a long-run operation.

A hundred years ago, a New York lawyer Samuel Untermeyer financed the first Scofield Reference Bible; since then, the Scofield Bibles are being republished in newer even more pro-Jewish editions and they bring in millions of Christian Zionists.

Joachim Martillo writes in his Judonia: “Jewish efforts benefit from organizational memory that does not exist in other lobbying situations. The longevity of Jewish Federation organizations can give Israel Lobbying efforts a generational aspect not seen elsewhere. For example, Israel Advocacy organizations worked for fifty years to delegitimize Arabists in the Foreign Service and State Department, and replace them with Israel-sympathetic personnel”.

Martllo erroneously connects this result with some specific pro-Israel organisation. Success of Zionism (and incidentally its crimes) is just the strawberry on top of the Jewish success cake. The Jews are engaged in advocacy of Jews, and consequently they delegitimize Arabists, or priests, or independent historians who do not subscribe to the notion that Jews are special in consistently beneficial way. Zionism is a result of Jewish pruning of history, and this pruned history is what we were taught.

There are no Arab sheiks or Russian oligarchs or American oilmen ready to finance anything long term of no immediate relevancy. They do not understand that practically every entry of encyclopaedia, every textbook influence future generations. A correct entry on, say, Poincare or monotheism or Persian invasion could save potential Zionists from their delusions of grandeur.

Wikipedia is a great idea for Jews: people of all nations from all over the world contribute of their knowledge, and then this Summa is pruned in the way acceptable to the pro-Jewish gardeners. Despite its “free” image, Wikipedia is part and parcel of the immense Judaised media holding, and thus is as biased as any other publication of the group from the New York Times (owned by Sulzberger) to Liberation (owned by Rothschild) to hundreds of Murdock papers.

Conclusion

Wikipedia is an important asset, like the New York Times, but both are in the hands of enemies of freedom. Sometimes good and truthful articles or entries are to be found in both, but these are specks of gold dust placed there to salt the dud mine. We certainly want to democratise both; to make both really democratic and accessible. Until this is done, we should explain that both are tools of mind control not to be trusted or taken at face value. If Wiki wants to preserve some of its reliability, it must get rid of its Zionist enforcers. Not only of the CAMERA bumpkins, but of the hard men in black suits, the Agents Smith.