Mom Whose Children Kidnapped by Manitoba Child Protection Agency Hits Front Page of Globe

From Paul Fromm

Dear Free Speech Supporter:

We have to pinch ourselves to remind ourselves that this is Canada not communism at its very worst, where children were taken from their parents and the official ideology was that the children belonged to the state, not the parents. Yet, right here in Canada, in Winnipeg, Manitoba to be precise, two children were kidnapped from their White nationalist parents by meddling social workers ironically called the “Manitoba Child Protection Agency.”

The children were seized March 25. The 7-year old girl, of a White nationalist couple drew a swastika on her wrist. An easily offended priss of a teacher, in effect, assaulted the child and scrubbed the symbol off her arm. The mother helped the child draw the same symbol in magic marker on her arm that night and so she went to school the next day. Apparently. the school called the police and the child protection agency. The police started a “hate” investigation.

“’There were police officers there and I looked at them and said, ‘Is this because of the drawing on her arm?’ And they said yes, the mother recalled. She said she went home hysterical, terrified they would be coming for her two-year-old son as well. Sure enough, the knock at the door came quickly, and authorities plucked her son from her arms. ‘Apparently a swastika is an evil Nazi symbol and they felt the need to interfere in our lives and to interfere in how we raise our children,” she says.” (Globe and Mail, July 5, 2008)

“She says she is the victim of a state run amok, persecuted for holding political views that are outside the mainstream. Manitoba’s child and family services agency, although it can’t discuss the specifics of the case, says it is bound to intervene when a child’s physical or emotional well-being is at risk. Court documents say the parent’s conduct might endanger the emotional well-being of the children, and the children might be at risk because of the parent’s behaviour and associations.”

The social workers’ mandate for meddling is outrageous. Just what is the child’s “emotional well-being.” Many a parent is cold, aloof or neglectful or angers a child by punishing him or her. Do all these cases justify the snatching of the child from the parents. It’s clear that this is a case of outright political persecution. The parents are to lose their children because of their “associations.” (more…)

David Duke after a speech and book signing in Spain on July 5th

Hear David Duke’s Radio Broadcast “Questions to Prevent the Planned War in Iran!”

This is one of Dr. Duke’s most powerful broadcasts ever. We urge our friends to add some good graphics to this powerful speech and post it on youtube and other video sharing outlets. If you do so please let us know and be sure to send us the link here at www.davidduke.com. email Info45(at)davidduke.com –Thanks!

No More Blank Checks for War

By Pat Buchanan

After the assassination of the archduke in Sarajevo on June 28, 1914, Austria got from Kaiser Wilhelm a “blank cheque” to punish Serbia. Germany would follow whatever course its ally chose to take. Austria chose war on Serbia. And World War I resulted.

On March 31, 1939, Britain gave a blank check to Poland in its dispute with Germany over Danzig, a town of 350,000 Germans. Should war come, Britain would fight on Poland’s side.

Poland refused to negotiate, Adolf Hitler attacked, and Britain declared war. After six years, the British Empire collapsed. Germany was burnt to ashes. Poland entered the slave quarters of Joseph Stalin’s empire.

Lesson: No great power should ever give to a small ally or client state a blank check to drag it into war.

This raises the question: Has President Bush given Israel a blank check?

A year ago, Israel attacked and smashed an alleged nuclear reactor site in Syria. In April, Israel held a five-day civil defense drill. In June, Israel sent 100 F-15s and F-16s, with refueling tankers, toward Greece in a simulated attack. The planes flew 1,450 kilometers, the distance to Iran’s uranium enrichment facility at Natanz.

On June 6, Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz threatened, “If Iran continues its nuclear weapons program we will attack it.”

Ehud Olmert returned from a June meeting with Bush to tell Israelis, “George Bush understands the severity of the Iranian threat and the need to vanquish it, and intends to act on the matter before the end of his term.”

Is Israel bluffing, or in dead earnest?

For while Israel can do damage to Iran, she cannot defeat Iran without using nuclear weapons. But any attack Israel launched against Iran would require U.S. complicity, and any Israeli war with Iran would almost certainly require the United States to do most of the fighting to win or end it.

 
Continue at Buchanan.org

Looking Into the Lobby

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s annual conference is one of Washington’s most important—and least reported—events.

By Philip Weiss

For three days in the capital in early June, suspense built over the question of how the American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference would greet Barack Obama. There was a lot of grousing about Obama in the hallways of the Washington Convention Center, and AIPAC officials repeatedly warned the faithful to be respectful. “We are not a debate society or a protest movement. … our goal is to have a friend in the White House,” executive director Howard Kohr said in a strict tone. It wasn’t hard to imagine things going poorly: Obama gets booed on national television. He feels insulted. Conservative Jewish donors and voters turn off to Obama. He becomes president without their support. AIPAC has no friend in the Oval Office.

But of course, Obama complied. His speech became the annual example the conference provides of a powerful man truckling. Two years ago, it was Vice President Cheney’s red-meat speech attacking the Palestinians. Last year, it was Pastor John Hagee’s scary speech saying that giving the Arabs any part of Jerusalem was the same as giving it to the Taliban. Obama took a similar line. He suggested that he would use force to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, made no mention of Palestinian human rights, and said that Jerusalem “must remain undivided,” a statement so disastrous to the peace process that his staff rescinded it the next day. Big deal. The actual meeting had gone swimmingly.

This was my first AIPAC conference, and the first surprise was how blatant the business of wielding influence is. The conference makes no bones about this function, the most savage expression of which is the Tuesday dinner at which AIPAC performs its “roll call,” where the names of all the politicians who have come to the conference are read off from the stage by three barkers in near auctioneer fashion. The pols try to outdo one another in I-love-Israel encomia. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi surely won the day when she teared up while dangling the dogtags of three Israeli soldiers captured by Hezbollah and Hamas two years ago.

The second big surprise was that apart from coverage of the headline speakers, the AIPAC conference is a media no man’s land. It would be hard to imagine a more naked exhibition of political power: a convention of 7,000 mostly rich people, with more than half the Congress in attendance, as well as all the major presidential candidates, the prime minister of Israel, the minority leader, the majority leader, and the speaker of the House. Yet there is precious little journalism about the spectacle in full. The reason seems obvious: the press would have to write openly about a forbidden subject, Jewish influence. They would have to take on an unpleasant informative task that they have instead left to two international relations scholars in their 50s—Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, authors of last year’s book The Israel Lobby.

 
Continue at The American Conservative

‘Iran does not intend to wipe out Israel’

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says Israel is disintegrating on its own and Iran will not take any act of aggression against it.

PRESS TV Report

“Israel is an illegal regime,” said President Ahmadinejad in a Tuesday press conference after a D8 summit in Kuala Lumpur.

“The regime will disintegrate on its own. Since Zionists can no longer sustain themselves, they have been forced to draw attention away from their present situation by blaming Iran,” he added.

President Ahmadinejad said that the Islamic Republic has never waged war against any nation and does not intend to do so, adding that Israel is not an exception to this policy.

“Iran has no plans to attack Israel,” he said in response to a question about whether the Islamic Republic intended to destroy Israel and to wipe out the Jewish people.

The Iranian president expounded that Jewish people amicably live in the Islamic Republic, are free to practice their religion, and despite being a small minority have a representative in the Iranian Parliament.

President Ahmadinejad asserted that the Israeli regime thrives on ‘invading and threatening’ regional countries. He reaffirmed that Iranians are fully prepared to defend their territorial integrity and will deliver a crushing response to invaders.

Israel accuses Iran of developing a military nuclear program and has threatened Tehran with the use of force should the Islamic Republic continue uranium enrichment.

According to a New York Times report, Israel staged a military maneuver in early June to prepare for a unilateral air strike on Iranian nuclear sites.

Tehran insists its nuclear program is directed at generating electricity and is in line with the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). (…Full Article)

[Video Link]

Jewish Groups Furious Over Supreme Court’s Decision to Remove Handgun Ban

More blatant Jewish hypocrisy: Jewish groups in America don’t want YOU to have handguns, yet in Israel they manufacture the powerful handgun called the “Desert Eagle.”

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision overturning a gun-control law is being criticized by several Jewish groups.

In a 5-4 decision announced Thursday, the court struck down the District of Columbia’s ban on owning handguns for self-defense, which was the strictest gun-control law in the country.

Several organizations, including the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress and the National Council of Jewish Women, issued statements criticizing the decision. The three organizations, along with the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, had signed on to a friend-of-the-court brief in the District of Columbia v. Heller case.

“The culture of guns and violence is pervasive among extremists,” said Glen S. Lewy, the ADL’s national chair, and Abraham Foxman, its national director, in a joint statement. “This decision places our communities — and the law enforcement officers that protect them — at greater risk of violence.”

Even while criticizing the decision, Jeffrey Sinensky, the AJC’s general counsel, said that while the court had determined that U.S. citizens have a private right to own and keep handguns for hunting and self-defense, its decision “does not impair the ability of local and state governments to pass sensible and effective gun control laws which protect citizens.”(…Full Article)

 
Source: NatAllNews

 
Also see Curt Maynard’s documentary on the Zionist assault against the 2nd Amendment - Link:

Anxiety In America: Citizens Ponder Their Fate

By Frosty Wooldridge
Frosty on the Radio - []

In a New York Times June 29th op-ed, “Anxious in America”, Thomas Friedman mulled over America’s accelerating dilemmas in Iraq, national debt and who might become the next president.

Either choice scares the daylights out of Americans on both sides. Neither candidate understands average citizens’ dilemmas in their jobs, communities or schools. Neither addresses what happens in the trenches of America.

Thus, most Americans vote against the other guy instead of ‘for’ a presidential candidate. In the case of McCain, he represents past paradigms, unending support for an endless Iraq War, old thinking and non-action or in-action.

Obama scares most folks as to his lack of experience, his association with “God D*** America” spewing Pastor Wright, shady-hoodlum Rezko in Chicago and his wife’s racial bias writings at Harvard against white America.

Both Obama and McCain voted to give amnesty to 20-30 million illegal aliens in 2007—without any understanding of the $3 trillion price tag or demographic impact. Both men did nothing and do nothing to stop illegal alien migration at over one million annually. In fact, McCain signed the 1986 amnesty giving 4.3 million illegal aliens a free pass, but never followed up on his promise to secure our borders. Both men voted to double current annual immigration at 1.2 million people to 2.4 million in the amnesty bill in June of 2007—thus causing a catastrophic population overload within the USA. Based on mathematics alone, this kind of short sightedness bodes poorly for a national leader.

Neither man supports any kind of a plan to secure our nation’s borders. Both men continued voting for insourcing, outsourcing and offshoring of American manufacturing jobs. Both crippled Americans with their votes in the U.S. Senate as to our national debt, $700 billion annual trade deficit, and no action on 400,000 annual anchor babies gaining immediate citizenship and welfare. Both men continued the taxpayer burden of educating millions of illegal alien children along with billions for health care. Neither man spoke up for American citizens as to jobs being stolen or wages degraded.

 
For more

‘Hate Criminals’ - With No Law Broken!

By Rev. Ted Pike
Ted Pike Comments

In the US, our First Amendment guarantees free speech. Because of this and determined opposition, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, architect of U.S. hate laws, has been frustrated in attempts to pass a federal hate and speech crime law. Yet, ADL has not given up. Through bias and hate crime laws on the state and local levels, this enormously powerful and persuasive Jewish activist group still aggressively erodes freedom of speech for Americans, especially Christians and conservatives.

ADL has persuaded lawmakers to pass bias and hate crimes legislation by saying these laws would not affect freedom of speech. This worked in Canada . In 1971, the northern branches of ADL, the Canadian Jewish Congress and B’nai B’rith Canada, convinced Parliament to enact their federal “anti-hate” law (The Canadian Human Rights Act). They assured MP’s that there were adequate restraints in the law to preserve freedom of speech. Yet the supposed “checks and balances” proved a sham.

In Canada today, there is no protection for anyone accused of expressing public, verbal “hatred or contempt” for members of a federally protected group (especially homosexuals, Jews, or Muslims). A homosexual “victim” needs only to persuade a single hearings officer that his feelings were hurt; truth is not admitted as evidence, and his critic will be found guilty as a hate criminal. First offenses average a $5000 fine. No one so accused in Canadian hate crimes tribunals has ever been acquitted. (more…)

With Dr. Duke meeting patriots in Spain we thought we would dust off this classic 2005 interview with legendary activist Pedro Varela, Dr. Duke and Pedro discuss Spain’s heroic struggle for independence from Moorish, Jewish and Marxist power, an incredible story of perseverance and ultimate victory. Complimenting Pedro’s interview is a surprisingly frank chapter from William Walsh’s master work; ‘Isabella of Spain’ which was published in 1930 back in the days before Zionist control and political correctness demanded that writers obfuscate or sugarcoat their subject matter:

ISABELLA OF SPAIN - Chapter 14

The Jews’ Activities In Spain - Their Persecution In Europe - The Conversos - Establishment Of The Spanish Inquisition

By William Thomas Walsh
Pedro Varela Interview

In MEDIEVAL Spain the Jews came nearer to building a New Jerusalem than at any time or place since their dispersion after the Crucifixion. Had they succeeded ‑- and several times they came perilously near success ‑- they might conceivably have managed, with Mohammedan aid, to destroy the Christian civilization of Europe. Their ultimate failure was caused chiefly by the life‑work of Isabel.

The date of their first migrations to the peninsula is disputed; but the evidence appears to indicate that they arrived not long after Saint James the Greater first preached the gospel of Christianity in Saragossa in A.D. 42. Some of those expelled from Rome by Claudius may have settled in Spain. Certain it is that they spread through the country very early in the Christian era, and multiplied so rapidly that their presence constituted a serious problem for the Arian (unorthodox Christian) Visigoths. They were not at first persecuted by the Christians; but, after the discovery that they were plotting to bring the Arabs from Africa for the overthrow of the Gothic kingdom, they were condemned to slavery by one of the councils of Toledo.

Nevertheless by the beginning of the eighth century they were numerous in all the chief cities, enjoyed power and wealth, and even obtained through bribery certain privileges denied to Christians. (more…)

Hear David Duke’s Day 2 Speech at EURO-RUS! Methods and Prospectives for Victory

Click on title for the audio mp3!

[Video Link]
Immigration Medical Fraud Alleged To Be Rampant In China

Canadian officials in Beijing turn a blind eye to reports of immigration fraud, clerk says

By Geoffrey York

BEIJING — Wang Xu, a young clerk at a Chinese government office, was working at his desk one day when his boss approached him with an odd assignment. He was ordered to report to a nearby medical clinic for an X-ray exam - even though he was perfectly healthy.

Puzzled by the order, he assumed it was some kind of routine check-up. But after he and a female colleague submitted to the chest X-rays, he soon discovered the real reason.

Mr. Wang says his boss admitted to him that the X-rays were for friends who had bribed doctors to provide fake documents for their Canadian immigration applications. He says his boss also told him that the fraudulent practice was widespread among Chinese citizens who want to conceal medical problems when they apply to emigrate to Canada.

The case appears to raise questions about corruption in Canada’s immigration procedures in China, the biggest source of immigrants to Canada.

Mr. Wang was so outraged by what happened that he submitted a complaint to the Canadian embassy in Beijing in 2003.

He also obtained e-mails from two Chinese officials who confirmed the fraud.

He told the embassy that he was willing to meet Canadian officials and provide all of his evidence, including his own X-rays. But the embassy never asked to meet him or see his evidence. In an e-mail to Mr. Wang, the embassy said it could not do anything about the case because of “privacy” issues. (more…)

Winston Smith Sounds Off
The Political Cesspool, Sundays 4-7 PM

This past Sunday’s broadcast (June 29) of The Political Cesspool Radio Program was a real barnstormer, my friends. I think the only way we’re going to be able to top it is if Sonny Landham gives us his first interview after being sworn in as Kentucky’s next senator, which would be appropriate, since we were one of the first exclusive interviews he gave after announcing his candidacy. Pastor Pete Peters was his usual intense, articulate, and ruggedly-charming self. Bill Rolen and I sparkled like diamonds and exemplified Job-like patience in tolerating that other guy (James Edwards) who was in the studio with us! And of course, Patrick J. Buchanan made his second appearance on our program.

We all knew Mr. Buchanan’s interview would spawn a flurry of hit pieces, and we even had a pool going on whether the ADL or the SPLC would be first with the story on their respective websites. Alas, Morris and Mark, Abe beat you to it (and Bill Rolen won the pool, which topped out at $1.63 and a nearly full coffee-club card). And man alive, is the ADL’s latest insipid pabulum showing up everywhere! They must have sent that instance of propaganda to their entire news mailing list. There’s no telling how much donation money will find its way into the bank accounts of Abe and his gang because of Mr. Buchanan’s appearance on our little broadcast. Perhaps Morris and Mark should have a heart-to-heart with Heidi, as she obviously was asleep at the wheel. (And I even said hello to her over the air. Heidi, you disappoint me, gal.) Remember, Morris – every dollar that goes to the ADL is one less dollar for you. And don’t tell me that doesn’t gall you to no end.

We call our little broadcast The Political Cesspool because that’s what our show is about – the cesspool that is American politics. There are many pipelines that lead to the stinking, noxious, disgusting, nauseous slough that constantly threatens to overflow, seep into your home, and strain the credibility of a flood damage insurance claim. But the pipeline that comes from the ADL is probably the largest and fastest-flowing of all the sewer pipes that contribute to the cesspool of politics and societal necrosis – a point of pride for the ADL in which they wallow like pigs in mud.

The ADL article is being presented as a news story, the work of an objective journalist. But it is, in fact, nothing more than the usual demagoguery of a hack ADL employee who is apparently being paid based upon how many times he uses the words and phrases racist, racism, extremism, white supremacist, anti-Semite, neo-Nazi, holocaust denier, and hate. In other words, the piece is a standard ADL fill-in form – just insert the target’s name, cut-and-paste a couple of other items in the “For Good Measure” box, and make sure the “ADL is wonderful” blurb at the bottom is clearly visible. (more…)

Jesse Helms RIP, Fought Racial Quotas

By James Buchanan – EURO

A Reuters article reports “Jesse Helms, a die-hard anti-communist firebrand who championed a wide range of conservative causes in his 30 years in the U.S. Senate, died early on Friday, aged 86… A blunt-talking product of the Old South, the lawmaker from North Carolina was known as “Senator No” for opposing just about anything that obstructed his conservative view of the world. He retired in 2003 after five terms in the Senate… For years, Helms played a key role in U.S. foreign policy as chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee, embracing a strong U.S. national defense and what he regarded as a moral foreign policy. This made the Republican curmudgeon a hero to fellow American conservatives… His name became synonymous with social conservatism.”

Senator Helms retired with declining health as neocons hijacked the Republican Party and its foreign policy. Two months after Helms retired, Bush launched his illegal neocon war on Iraq, which has wrecked the Republican Party in recent years, resulting in the loss of Congress in 2006 and caused the current political situation with polls predicting a blow out Republican defeat in 2008 –once again due largely to the illegal Iraq War.

Jesse Helms was one of the few politicians brave enough to speak out publicly against anti-White racial quotas (also known as Affirmative Action). Millions of jobs and promotions have been stolen from better-qualified Whites and given to Blacks and Latinos to appease the minorities and liberal hypocrites, who complained about anti-Black discrimination, but who put into law anti-White discrimination, which victimized thousands of times more people. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been stolen from Whites due to this massive theft of jobs and promotions. American industry has been badly handicapped as large numbers of incompetent minorities have been forced upon every major US company while Japanese and European companies are able to compete using the most talented people, not quota-hires brought on board for belonging to a swarthy-colored race. (more…)

Stormfront Radio & Television!

David Duke & Don Black’s Friday, July 4th broadcast or Download
–On today’s uplifting Independence Day program, Don and David discuss the importance of maintaining our independence from other nations and especially from Israel, they also discuss last weekend’s EURO-RUS Conference (see here), along with commenting on John McCain’s latest shenanigans promoting the NAU. All this and much more only on this edition of Stormfront Radio! —[MP3]

David Duke & Don Black’s Monday, June 30th broadcast or Download
–Join Don and David for another slightly abbreviated program today as Dr. Duke reports on the situation in Europe between meetings with French patriots in Paris! We also include a rousing 2004 EURO Conference speech from the late great John Tyndall to round out the hour. All this along with much more, only on Stormfront Radio! —[MP3]

David Duke & Don Black’s Friday, June 27th broadcast or Download
–Join Don and David for a slightly abbreviated show today as Dr. Duke reports from the Euro-Rus Convention in Dendermonde, Belgium! (See EuroRus.org for more details). All this along with much more, only on Stormfront Radio! —[MP3]

Professor Alan Dershowitz and the Name of One Child, with Proof

Alan M. Dershowitz
Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law
Harvard University

Dear Professor Dershowitz:

I watched you speak (thanks to YouTube) on 04 May at the symposium titled “Defending Truth: Legal and Moral Imperatives of Holocaust Denial.” I understand that the event was organized by the U. of Baltimore School of Law and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies.

I agree with you that questions about the Holocaust should be open to the “marketplace of ideas.” Since February I have been asking academics to provide me with the name of “one person, with proof, who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz.” The first professor to whom I addressed the question was Deborah Lipstadt of Emory U., the lady whose virtues you speak of with such enthusiasm during your talk. In the event, Professor Lipstadt did not respond.

Since then I have asked hundreds of academics that one question. The question does [not] claim that the gas chambers did not exist, and does not make a claim that the “Holocaust” did not happen. It is a very simple, direct question. To date, not one academic has provided me with such a name, and none has attempted to do so.

For example, I have written the Director of one of the agencies that sponsored the symposium where you spoke, Dr. Paul Shapiro, director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Center for Advance Holocaust Studies. Could he provide me with the name of “one person, with proof …” He has maintained the same discreet silence in response to this simple inquiry that most all others have used to – how shall I put it – to perhaps evade the question.

In your talk at the U. Baltimore symposium you suggest that Holocaust minimizers like Hilberg, Chomsky, and Finkelstein are more difficult to deal with because, unlike straight out “deniers,” their writings are not based on “the existence or non-existence of gas chambers.” You ask, “Why are gas chambers so important?” And you respond to your question by saying: “If there were gas chambers, everything else from the [Holocaust] narrative follows.” The implication is, if there were no gas chambers, everything else in the Holocaust narrative would “falter.” I think you are right about this. (more…)