David Duke Online Radio Report 03-05-2003
No War for Israel!

by David Duke

Broadcast Date 03-05-2003

America under George Bush is rushing headlong toward war. This is a war that has been promoted for years by the most radical Jewish supremacists in Israel and America. Some people who oppose this war have taken up the slogan “no blood for oil,” saying the coming war is being promoted by big American and European corporate oil interests.

Is oil the real reason for this war? Today, I will discuss the true driving force behind the Iraq War and why this war is actually one that that will be fought against the true interests of the United States of the America. First, let’s deal with the “War for Oil” argument.

In actual fact, the Iraq war will more likely hurt Western oil companies than help them. After an initial flurry of oil prices, a regime change in Iraq would eventually let the oil flow freely again and oil prices would fall dramatically. That would hurt the Western oil companies by lowering the value of their underlying reserves. Western oil companies have almost all of their oil reserves outside of the Mideast. Their reserves are in places such as Texas, Alaska, Mexico, Venezuela, the North Sea, Siberia and elsewhere.

And don’t suppose America will just go in and start stealing the oil, for that is not even a remote possibility. Oil will be sold by the new regime just as it always has been. It is true that there will be a division of spoils promised to the occupying powers as an inducement for their support of the war, but those spoils are in the form of contracts to buy oil, as well as to develop and refine oil products and other commercial concerns available in an non-embargoed Iraq.

In truth, big oil corporate interests will be harmed in a regime change accomplished by war or simply by normalization of relations with Iraq. In either case, the oil would flow freely again and ultimately hurt the big oil interests by increasing the oil supply and lowering the underlying value of their own reserves.

A war against Iraq threatens regime change not only in Iraq, but across the Mideast. It is likely the new regimes will be violently against European-American interests, and their targets will certainly include the large corporate oil companies. The millions of Americans who live and work overseas and the billions of dollars of American investments would be gravely threatened. The war on Iraq will certainly unleash a torrent of hatred and terrorism against Americans around the world. It will create exactly what bin Laden and other anti-American fanatics desire.

Bush also claims that the war could bring democracy to many nations in the Mideast. But, the truth is that the vast majority of people of almost every country of the world are far more anti-Israeli and anti-American than are their ruling entities, so more democracy would probably even produce more anti-Israeli and even more anti-American sentiment. Even in Turkey, where the ruling party recently supported bringing in American troops to use against Iraq, the people of that country are over 90 percent opposed to involvement in the Iraq war, and their recently-elected parliament voted against it.

So, the big oil companies have no interest in this war, but actually face huge long-term risks from the war. So who exactly does have an interest in war?

There is no credible evidence that Iraq poses any real threat to the United States. Dozens of other nations have weapons of mass destruction. Iraq has had them for decades but never used any of them against the United States, even in the Gulf War. With UN inspectors roaming the country at will, and with the knowledge that the United States would knock Iraq into the stone age if it ever dared to use them, there is probably less risk from Iraq then from any other of a dozen other countries. North Korea, for example, has atomic warheads and the missiles to carry them to American cities. Furthermore, North Korea has openly threatened to use them against us if we move against them. Yet, we refrain even from embargo against North Korea. Iraq poses no real danger to the United States, but an Iraq war poses great dangers to American interests here at home and abroad.

One way the war will hurt us is by damaging our economy. For instance, American officials have sought to bribe Turkey with upwards of 26 billion American dollars. For what, you might ask? To simply use Turkey as a staging area for Bush’s war against Iraq. That’s six billion in immediate cash and 20 billion in loans, and these loans are almost never repaid. That’s 26 billion dollars! That’s a huge amount of money taken from the American taxpayer, and that incredible amount is only a tiny bit of the overall costs of this war.

The administration is also talking about giving Israel an additional 14 billion dollars on top of our normal payout of around 7 billion dollars a year. One must also factor in the military cost of the war and the occupation afterwards. That would certainly cost at least 200 billion dollars and probably a lot more. One must factor in the temporary huge increase in oil costs because of the war and the economic damage done by this war. That cost has already amounted to hundreds of billions of dollars and it climbs every day. Every time you take a drive, every time you pay an increased utility bill or any other bill, you are paying for this insane policy.

As badly as this war will hurt our economy (far from the stated purpose of protecting America) this war will make us far less secure. Our involvement in Mideastern conflicts and America’s support for the criminal actions of Israel have caused millions of people around the world to hate America. Many of them are even willing to sacrifice their very lives to get at us. America’s support for Israel’s agenda directly led to the 911 attack upon America. America’s Israeli-controlled foreign policy led to the carnage of thousands of lives lost on September 11. It has caused America to live under a constant threat of terrorism and threatens our most precious Constitutional freedoms.

By any standard, this Iraq war is of no benefit to the United States of America, nor is it of any benefit to the commercial oil industry. So, for whose benefit does America wage this war? The answer is Israel, Israel, Israel! Radical Jewish supremacists in Israel launched this drive for war. Their agents all over the world, both in government and media, have been the real power behind this war.

Pro-Israeli, Jewish supremacists are found in key government positions all over the world and they also hold powerful positions in the ownership and hierarchy of media. In the political sector, the hawks driving the push to war are called Neocons. Neocon is an abbreviation for neo-conservative. As crazy as it might sound, many of the leaders behind the Neocons are pro-communist Jews who once opposed the Viet Nam War. These Marxists were peaceniks who opposed the Vietnam War but radical hawks for Israel. That’s right; many of them were former Marxists: such as the man behind the Jewish supremacist magazine, Commentary, Norman Podhoretz. Other radical Zionists pushing for this war include the former Marxist Daniel Horowitz, President Bush’s official spokesman Ari Fleischer, his speechwriter David Frum, and close advisors Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Elliott Abrams, David Wurmser and Douglas J. Feith.

Back in 1996, long before the current push for war, a prominent Zionist group led by Richard Perle wrote a report titled: A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. (http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm) It called for war on Iraq. It was written not for the United States but for the incoming Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The report basically argues how destruction of Iraq will protect Israel’s monopoly of nuclear weapons and give Israel a free hand to defeat the Palestinians and impose whatever colonial settlement Israel has in store.

Not only have Jewish agents in the government pushed for this war, but they drive the media push for war. The war could not be possible without the massive support it has gotten from the media. A great deal of the news reporting around the world is biased for the Iraq war and against the Palestinians. In America, there is an unrelenting call for war by thousands of pundits, editorial writers, news editors and pro-war reporters. And, make no mistake about it, there is no shortage of Jewish supremacists among them.

The fact is that almost all of the major media in America, and much of it in Europe, have been cheerleaders for this war. For instance, most of those in media never challenge any of the basic premises of the war.

When it is alleged that we must go to war against Iraq because it violated UN Resolution 1441, no major pundits retort by saying that if this is a valid reason to go to war, then we must go to war against Israel, a nation that has violated far more UN resolutions than has Iraq. For instance, for 35 years Israel has violated Resolution 242, a UN resolution that demanded that Israel leave the occupied West Bank, a resolution that was even supported by the United States.

When it is stated that Iraq must be attacked because it has, quote, “weapons of mass destruction,” why do no television news authorities respond by saying, “If we go to war against Iraq for having weapons of mass destruction then we also must go to war against Israel, which has one of the world’s biggest arsenals of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.”

When it is said that there must be inspections in Iraq, no newspapers suggest that if we demand inspections of Iraq, the same demand should be made of Israel, a nation that has one of the world’s deadliest arsenals of biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons. On this score, Iraq cooperates on this vital matter while Israel does not.

When it is said we should go to war against Iraq because its regime has invaded other countries, killed thousands of civilians and tortured thousands more in their jails, no TV networks suggest that we must also go to war against Israel, a nation led by war criminal Ariel Sharon and guilty of the same crimes.

When it is said that we should go to war against Iraq for not allowing freedom and self-government, no journalists suggest that we also must go to war against Israel for their brutal military occupation over 3 million Palestinian civilians, people not allowed even elementary freedoms.

This same news media tells us constantly, quote, “at least Israel is democratic,” but we hear no voices responding by saying “How can Israel be called democratic, when 3 million Palestinians suffer under brutal military occupation for 35 years and are not allowed democratic control of their own society?”

In truth, Jewish supremacists in the media have even controlled the anti-war debate. They make a number of issues off limits. One is allowed to argue whether or not Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. One can argue whether or not Iraq is in material breach of UN resolutions. One can argue whether inspections should be given more time. But, it is forbidden to mention Israel’s horrendous arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, Israeli’s refusal to allow inspections, or even that Israel violated far more UN resolutions than has Iraq.

It is also off limits, of course, to suggest that the great weight of Jewish ownership and management of the mass media creates the media bias for war, and that this Jewish influence actually helps to shape the anti-war debate itself. It is verboten to point out the conflict of interest by the many Jewish supremacists who are key advisers to both Bush and Blair. Yes, there are certainly Gentiles who support the war for varying reasons, but how many of them have been influenced by the weight of Jewish power? Gentiles in government and media learn very quickly what they can and cannot say. If they go along with the Jewish hawks, they will prosper handily, but if they dare to expose Jewish supremacism, it is practically an act of self-immolation.

It is not big oil or capitalism that it leading the pro-Israel, pro-war voice of the media and government. It is Jewish supremacism.

These same Jewish media powers have decreed that it is quote, “anti-Semitic,” unquote, to suggest that many of these Jews in the media and in critical positions in government could be more loyal to the interests of Israel than to the nations in which they live. In last week’s broadcast, I quoted the words of Stephen Steinlight, the former head of national affairs of the largest and most influential Jewish organization in the United States, the American Jewish Committee. In a Jewish magazine article, Steinlight recently wrote that as a typical Jew of his generation, he was taught from childhood to salute a foreign flag, sing foreign national songs, to view Israel as the true homeland and that Gentiles are inferior to Jews.

It is true that in spite of the fact that Jews comprise the great bulk of the media and political forces driving it on, there are some Jews who oppose this war. They should be applauded, but even most of them don’t talk about the real issues I discussed earlier. There is too little said about the real reasons we are being driven to war. You see, the pro-Israel media has made it permissible to oppose the war based on the “no war for oil argument.” One can say that without incurring the wrath of the Jewish media.

If fact, the Israel-Firsters who are busily promoting this war must smile a little bit when they hear the oil argument, first because it is easily refutable, and secondly, because it deflects attention from the real driving force behind the war. War with Iraq, and upcoming wars with Iran, Syria, Lebanon and even Saudi Arabia have been long-standing objectives of Israel and its loyal servants in the United States.

So one can say, “No War for Oil,” but just don’t say, “No War for Israel,” for if you do, all hell will break loose on you.

It is similar to the deception the Jewish media used after the attack on the World Trade Center. The kosher word-shapers of the media immediately told Americans that we were attacked, quote, “because the hijackers hated freedom!” In his many interviews before 911, bin Laden never criticized America’s freedom: he criticized the fact that Americans had let themselves be controlled by the Zionists. Bin Laden and the hijackers had no hatred of freedom. Their hatred of America was born from America’s support of Israel’s brutal suppression of the Palestinian people.

One must respect the cleverness of these Jewish supremacists. If the world was told the truth that we were attacked because of our support of Israel, it might just dawn on millions of Americans to ask the unaskable: if supporting the criminal acts of Israel is really worth it? Is it worth the economic cost estimated by a writer for the Christian Science Monitor: one trillion dollars since the founding of Israel? Is it worth the thousands of lives lost on September 11? Is it worth the terroristic attacks of Israel against the United States such as the attack on the USS Liberty and the terrorism against America in the Lavon Affair? Is it worth the continued threat of terrorism to us and our children, and the loss of our most precious freedoms?

We must expose the Jewish supremacists as the ones behind this war. We also must expose their moral hypocrisy. On Sunday March 2, I watched a CNN program hosted by the very pro-Zionist, Wolf Blitzer. Blitzer hosts the Showdown Iraq show on that network and appears for hours every day shaping opinions for the war. He had an interview with none other than Elie Wiesel, survivor of Auschwitz and Noble Peace Prize recipient. This so-called, “man of peace,” went on to advocate a massive Iraq war, a war that will kill tens of thousands of Iraqis and cause millions of innocents to suffer, as well as throwing much of the world into turmoil and hatred.

Blitzer treated Wiesel as though he was talking with a god. Wiesel went on to tell us that we had to attack Iraq because of what Iraq did to Iranians during the Iran-Iraq War. Blitzer, of course, didn’t dare ask fellow Jewish supremacist Wiesel the obvious question of why Mr. Wiesel did not speak out about the Iraqi slaughter of Iranians during the years when the war occurred. Wiesel did not speak out at that time, of course, because he is a Jewish supremacist who could care less about Iranian lives. He cares about Iranians only when he can point to their death in order to inspire us to kill the enemies of the Jews.

During the time of the Iraq-Iran war, Israel saw Iran as its most dangerous enemy. So Israel through its dutiful servant, the United States, supported the Iraqis as part of their divide-and-conquer strategy. America, at the behest of Israeli agents in the American government, actually gave Iraq the chemical and biological weapons Iraq used in that war. Sworn testimony in the United States Senate proves this fact. As soon as Iran was vanquished, Iraq, with its strong military might and oil reserves, suddenly went from American ally and friend to an enemy of America. Why? It is because after Iran became exhausted, Iraq at that time became Israel’s number one enemy.

Wiesel and the other Jewish supremacists around the world are touted by the Jewish supremacist press to be moral paragons and men of peace, even when they support the worst sort of murder and hatred. In my book, My Awakening, I quote directly from writings of Elie Wiesel exposing the depth of racial hatred in his heart.

“Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate - healthy, virile hate - for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.”

Imagine if any Palestinian leader or spokesman would have said the same thing about Jews after Ariel Sharon’s massacre in Lebanon:

“Every Palestinian, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate - healthy, virile hate - for what the Jew personifies and for what persists in the Jew. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead.”

Can you imagine the outrage that would erupt from such a statement?

Remember, it was not so long ago that Menachem Begin, a terrorist with the blood of thousands of innocent women and children on his hands, won the Nobel Peace Prize. And recently, President Bush called one of the worst war criminals one earth, Ariel Sharon, a “Man of Peace. ”

Why is this war being waged against Iraq? It has nothing to do with the interests of the big oil companies and absolutely nothing to do with the real interests of the United States. In fact, this war will be terribly damaging to the safety, freedom and economic well-being of America and Americans. This crazy, insane, unpatriotic war could not go on without for the tremendous power exerted by the disloyal Jewish supremacists in our political process. It also would impossible to pursue this terrible war without the tremendous weight of Jewish supremacists and their agents in the world media.

When the history of the United States is written fifty years from now, I feel certain that it will be accepted fact that the Iraqi War became a critical turning point in American history.

The war, for all of the terrible damage it will inflict upon Iraq and ultimately upon America, will cause millions of Americans to finally see the ugly face of Jewish supremacy over our country. Even before the invasion has begun, this unjust war has already caused an awakening among millions people in Europe and around the world.

I believe that this evil war and all its subsequent damage to the United States — will eventually help lead to our own liberation from the hatred and suppression of Jewish supremacism.

It is my hope that for the sake of our brave, young fighting men, and indeed, for the people of our nation, that by a miracle we can avoid this Jewish war. Our voice must now be raised in America and around the world:

No War for Israel!

Sincerely,
David Duke

–
Visit the David Duke and EURO online catalog at www.davidduke.net

Read past articles by David Duke about terrorism and Sept 11 at:
http://www.davidduke.com/writings/israeliarticles.shtml

Learn more about EURO online at: http://www.whitecivilrights.com
Join EURO online at: http://www.whitecivilrights.com/join.shtml
Contribute online at: http://www.whitecivilrights.com/donate.shtml

The European-American Unity and Leadership Conference

and New Orleans Protocol

EURO Members and David Duke Report readers can be proud of the very successful New Orleans conference that EURO sponsored in New Orleans from May 28 to May 30.  Three hundred patriots from around the world and every corner of America filled a large New Orleans hotel to capacity for three days that many participants described as the most effective pro-White gathering they had ever attended.

In a year that is not yet half over we have had four major White nationalist conferences: American Renaissance (Herndon, VA Feb. 20-22), National Alliance (Hillsboro, WV April 17-18), International Revisionist (Sacramento, CA April 24), and now the European-American Unity and Leadership Conference (New Orleans, LA May 28-30).  This fourth and biggest conference so far was also dubbed The David Duke Homecoming as a welcome back to Representative David Duke after 13 months of imprisonment that ended only twelve days before the conference opening.

On the opening night of the conference the 300 participants enjoyed a round of brief thumbnail sketches presented by each of the conference speakers.  Stretching across the dais was a most impressive assemblage of nationalist leadership that included Sam G. Dickson, Dr. Edward Fields, Kevin Alfred Strom, John Tyndall, Bob Whitaker, Germar Rudolf, Paul Fromm, Edgar J. Steele, David Pringle, Willis Carto, and Don Black.

This round of opening cameos by each of the weekend’s speakers was just one of several innovations that marked the New Orleans Conference.  Another was the convening of a senior leadership meeting on Saturday May 29th in Room 233 of the hotel.  Out of this meeting emerged an agreement on movement principles that is being called The New Orleans Protocol.  Eight leaders of large pro-White groups: Willis Carto, Sam G. Dickson, Dr. Edward Fields, Kevin Alfred Strom, John Tyndall, Paul Fromm, David Pringle, and David Duke met at 5pm around a table at which they concurred on 3 fundamental principles.  These three principles are now called The New Orleans Protocol.

The first principle was that of zero tolerance within our cause for violence or suggested violence.  The distinction between violence and self-defense was made clear.  It was agreed that a zero tolerance policy towards violence is essential to protecting White racialist groups from the sort of agent provocateur or unhinged violence that our people’s enemies routinely use to destroy White nationalist groups.

The second principle was support for the goal of always maintaining a high moral tone to White Nationalist discourse.  The assembled leaders thought as one on the imperative of capturing the high ground of inspiration and greater purpose to our Cause.

The third principle was an accord that leaders and supporters of effective White Nationalist groups should refrain from attacking leaders or supporters of other effective White Nationalist groups that maintain the high standards of The New Orleans Protocol.

The pathbreaking accord forged by these eight leaders was promulgated throughout the remainder of the New Orleans Conference.  Representative Duke would allude to The New Orleans Protocol in his keynote address later that Saturday evening.  But it was not until the five-member Question and Answer Panel that ended the conference so powerfully on Sunday that The New Orleans Protocol was fully discussed.  From left to right across the dais in the five-member panel were Sam G. Dickson, Don Black, David Duke, Kevin Strom, and Paul Fromm.  Both a video and an audio recording of this five-member panel as well as all of the other presentations was made.  The audio recording is already available online at www.whitecivilrights.com.  The video version is now being edited.   In his welcoming remarks, Rep. Duke proclaimed that:

“What we are trying to do is provide a common front against an enemy that would destroy our heritage and our freedom forever.  We are in the final battle, truly, for mankind.  I think it’s a battle of good and evil.”

“Not only have they sown an alien, soulless, ethic that has led to our catastrophic birthrates, and opened our borders.  They have propagandized our people that race-mixig, far from being an unnatural and undesirable phenomenon, as viewed by our forefathers and healthy peoples since the beginning of time; they have told us, in fact, this is natural and wonderful and desirable.”

 “But those who have propagandized this myth upon us, this perverted view, are themselves the biggest opponents of intermarriage (for themselves).”

Rep. Duke pointed out that the catastrophic birthrates that have been induced among our people would cause 100 White parents to have only 67 children at a fertility rate of 1.25 per couple.  If this catastrophic rate were to continue those 67 children would reproduce only 39 children, who would reproduce only 25 children, who would reproduce only 15 children.  And by the fifth generation those 15 remaining Whites would bear only 9.5 children.  In only five generations our White population would have been decimated, being only a tenth of what it had been 

 The dedication of the conference participants showed in the arduous trips that many undertook to attend.  An entire family drove two days from Delaware, another from Wisconsin.   Folks over 80 years old drove and rode from Utah and North Dakota.  Attendees brought their children.  Many college students attended, and two spoke.  A good contingent of Canadians flew to New Orleans.  Other than a few States like Vermont, Rhode Island, Hawaii, and Maine every State was represented in the audience.  From Britain, John Tyndall is renowned as the founder of the British National Party (BNP).  Paul Fromm’s Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFÉ) is the leader in Canada.  Free speech exile Germar Rudolf of Germany publishes the eminent Revisionist.  From Virginia, Willis Carto’s American Free Press has a huge readership that follows in a line of almost half a century of mass publications by Mr. Carto.  From Georgia, Dr. Ed Fields’ The Truth At Last has the same kind of venerable history in our Cause.   Many members of David Duke’s European-American Unity and Rights Organization (EURO) and readers of his David Duke Report filled the Jefferson Ballroom of the Airport Plaza Hotel.  Kevin Strom and David Pringle represented the dynamic publications and programs of the National Alliance.  Having driven 14 hours from Florida, Don Black of www.stormfront.org/forum spoke for the world’s first (1995) and largest (29,000 members) pro-White website.  Two of our cause’s finest attorneys, Sam G. Dickson and Edgar J. Steele, journeyed from Georgia and Idaho respectively to deepen our insights into the dangers and the opportunities that we have in the legal realm.

Thank goodness that the conference organizers were able to offer very good accommodations and dining to the determined patriots who traveled such distances.  Throughout the conference a 150-seat hotel restaurant served excellent breakfasts, lunches, and dinners for low group prices.  The chance to share conversation over meals was a high point of the three-day gathering for everyone.  The conference banquet required the entire floor space of the hotel’s main ballroom for the thirty tables of nine that were served.  Fourteen six-foot tables were set up in the main ballroom all three days for the large array of books, pamphlets, magazines, and imprinted clothing, pins, and stickers that participants took home with them.  Among the most popular of these items were cases (24 per case) of Rep. Duke’s Jewish Supremacism.

An oft-heard refrain as the European-American Unity and Leadership Conference closed was: “let’s do this again….soon.”