EU Parliamentarian Bruno Gollnisch on learning that he would be stripped of immunity for simply defending free speech. Gollnisch now faces a criminal trial in France not for denying the Holocaust, but for simply saying that Historians should have the right to debate aspects of the Holocaust and any other historical issue without fear of imprisonment, that imprisoning people for opinion is a disgraceful violation of human rights.

UN — Universal Declaration of Human Rights

PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people, …

And Article 19:

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

The United States and all European nations supported this declaration of Human Rights and the rights of freedom of speech contained therein.

So why are Ernst Zundel and David Irving in prison at this moment for offering non-violent, politically incorrect intellectual opinions about historical events that took place over 60 years ago? David Irving is the author of over 30 books found in almost every library in the world, including the library of the prison he now resides in. He now faces possible imprisonment for up to 20 years! Why does EU Parliamentarian Dr. Bruno Gollnisch face criminal charges and possible imprisonment in France for merely speaking in defense of the right of freedom of speech on all political and historical matters? Where is the international media outrage against not only the suppression of freedom of speech but also the imprisonment of men of conscience for excercising their inherent human rights?

Jewish extremists have sought and used their power and influence to deny freedom of speech and basic human rights to these men and thousands of others from Canada to Australia, New Zealand and across Europe. It is time for all men of conscience who believe in freedom to stand up to the evil men and the oppressive governments who seek to imprison men for crimes of thought and conscience!

Want to know the truth about Jewish Supremacism in their own words?

Anti-Semitism and Jewish chauvinism can only be fought simultaneously.” –Israel Shahak, holocaust survivor and Israeli Peace Activist

Jewish Supremacism –the Author’s Preface

I promise that this book will challenge you. Its amazing documentary evidence will confront some of your most cherished beliefs.

If you can put aside as best you can the prejudices you may have on this subject and even preconceptions you might have about me personally — you can more fairly evaluate the ideas and evidence in this book. That is all an author can ask of his reader; and I ask it of you. It is my earnest belief that if you endeavor to keep an open mind, what you read will surprise you.

The real power of this book comes from its documentation from major sources. In fact, you will quickly discover that most of my documents about Jewish Supremacism are from Jewish sources. They argue more convincingly for my point of view than anything I could write. I encourage you to go to the sources that I quote and check them out for yourself. In this book I take you along with me on a fascinating journey of discovery in a forbidden subject. I urge you to courageously keep an open mind while you explore the topics ahead, for that is the only way any of us can find the truth.

Some will defame this book by calling it anti-Semitic. Yet, it is not considered anti-American to examine historical mistreatment of Indians. No one calls it anti-Christian to talk about the excesses of the Inquisition. No one says that it is anti-Muslim to examine extreme elements within Muslim fundamentalism. Is one considered anti-White for documenting the history of Jim Crow in the South?

This book is not anti-Semitic; it simply examines and documents elements of ethnic supremacism that have existed in the Jewish community from historical to modern times.

Any criticism of Jewish Supremacism is immediately condemned as “anti-Semitism.” The chronic media recital of the horrors of the Holocaust has made the term “anti-Semitic” morally equivalent to the endorsement of mass murder. The word itself shuts down reason and evokes heat rather than light. The word is flagrantly overused; it is even used against those who simply protest Israeli human rights violations against Palestinians. (more…)