MidEast Policy—Immigration Policy: Is The Other Boot About To Drop?

By Kevin MacDonald
January 31st, 2007

Almost 3 ½ years ago I published Thinking about Neoconservatism, analyzing the neoconservative movement in the context of my studies of the behavior pattern of Jewish groups in the societies where they live. I concluded neoconservatism was the latest of a long procession of political and intellectual movements dominated and essentially controlled by members of the Jewish community, in effect dedicated to a particular concept of how to promote the interests of that community. I specifically cited foreign policy and immigration as hallmark interests.

At the time, and for a couple of years later, this was an unmentionable theory. I am told certain prominent web sites stopped linking to VDARE.com after my essay was published. The malign presence of the SPLC (the “Southern Poverty Law Center”, a notorious ethnically-oriented Political Correctness enforcer) was soon felt on the scene, not coincidentally, and it named VDARE.COM a “hate group”, a sobriquet more normally associated with groups advocating violence and other forms of illegality.

But now public debate has changed considerably. Serious antiwar commentary routinely connects the Iraq/Iran policy problem with the influence of Israel and her friends in America.  (See here and here and here.)

So I ask now: will the other boot drop? Will this candor next extend to the immigration controversy? (….Full Article Here)

The “Wipe Israel Off The Map” Hoax
What Ahmadinejad really said and why this broken record is just another ad slogan for war

By Paul Joseph Watson of Prison Planet

Commentary by David Duke — Every day print and broadcast media around the world repeats the lie that the President of Iran threatens to “wipe Israel off the map.” Most of the time when there is any article or media discussion concerning Iran and its President, Ahmadinejad, you will be exposed to this supposed quotation. Bogus claims of Iran building nuclear weapons (Iran is allowing IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency) added to the “wipe Israel off the map” lie creates an image of impeding genocide to justify massive destruction of lives and property in Iran. These blatant lies are being used to justify a murderous war against Iran, a war that will be catastrophic not only the Iranian people but for the people of America, Europe and the World.

These lies are promoted by Jewish extremists in Israel and around the world to promote wholesale military strikes against Iran. This is a war desired by Israel, but a war for which America and the rest of the world would pay a devastating price. A murderous attack against Iran would surely bring a response in whatever ways Iran could strike back, and since they have limited ability to drop bombs by missiles or fighter jets, they will strike back with massive state sponsored terrorism against those states that attack them. Terror around the world would grow exponentially. In addition, any such an attack would certainly result in the highest oil prices in history and usher in a worldwide economic depression. Unless the lies of the Jewish extremists are exposed, we may well enter perhaps the most cataclysmic era of world history. I have already run a number of articles on Davidduke.com about the “wipe Israel off the map” lie, but it is imperative that this lie be exposed again and again. In doing so we can also expose the pernicious Jewish extremist influence in the media that lies about this and many other issues of vital importance to us. Here is this important article:

Barely a day goes by that one can avoid reading or hearing yet another Israeli, American or British warhawk regurgitate the broken record that Iran’s President Ahmadinejad threatened to “wipe Israel off the map,” framed in the ridiculous context that Israelis are being targeted for a second holocaust. This baseless rallying call for conflict holds about as much credibility as Dick Cheney’s assertion that Saddam Hussein was planning to light up American skies with mushroom clouds. (more…)

(Left) You will hear and read what I want you to read, and you will be ruled by the politicians that Israel wants!

Pictured is Haim Saban, the media mogul who is an Israeli citizen who has been now revealed to be the biggest political contributor in the United States.

(Right) Saban with the “Butcher of Beirut,” mass murderer Ariel Sharon.

Revealed: The Biggest Political Contributor in America is an Israeli Extremist!
Israeli Publication Boasts that the top three Political Contributors in America are Jewish Partisans
By David Duke

YNews in Israel has just reported that the biggest contributor in all of U.S. Politics is the Jewish extremist and Israeli citizen Haim Saban. In addition YNews reports that the top three political donors are all Jewish, Israeli partisans (excerpts of the article are quoted below).

Professor Alan Dershowitz as well as dozens of Israel first media pundits have been telling the American people that my repeated assertion that Zionists have incredible influence over American politics is nothing but an “anti-Semitic canard.” They should be careful when they make such assertions, for If the “canard” turns out to be true, then they are saying that the truth itself is “anti-Semitic.”

Last year, Professors Walt and Mearsheimer have added their voices with mine and with others who have long been talking about the enormous power that Jewish extremists have in American politics and media. Walt and Mearsheimer have been compared to me, former President Jimmy Carter has been compared to me, and even Jewish-descended Gen. Wesley Clark has been compared to me for claiming that “NY money men” were behind a coming war against Iran. Abraham Foxman of the so-called Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (The ADL is actually an organization dedicated to defamation, the defamation of anyone who dares to criticize Jewish extremism.) exclaimed after Clark’s remarks that, “It is not just David Duke anymore.”

Yet, every day we see clear examples of inordinate Jewish power in both politics and media that prove my contentions to be 100 percent correct. Fox News recently released a rundown of the largest contributors in American politics. Lo-and-behold, the top three were Jewish Israeli Partisans, and the biggest of them all was Haim Saban, is a radical Zionist, Israeli citizen. (more…)

The Hidden Cost of Free Congressional Trips to Israel
Branded as ‘educational,’ these trips offer Israeli propagandists an opportunity to expose members of Congress to only their side of the story.

By Jim Abourezk
January 26, 2007

SIOUX FALL, S.D. - Democrats in Congress have moved quickly – and commendably – to strengthen ethics rules. But truly groundbreaking reform was prevented, in part, because of the efforts of the pro-Israel lobby to preserve one of its most critical functions: taking members of Congress on free “educational” trips to Israel.

The pro-Israel lobby does most of its work without publicity. But every member of Congress and every would-be candidate for Congress comes to quickly understand a basic lesson. Money needed to run for office can come with great ease from supporters of Israel, provided that the candidate makes certain promises, in writing, to vote favorably on issues considered important to Israel. What drives much of congressional support for Israel is fear – fear that the pro-Israel lobby will either withhold campaign contributions or give money to one’s opponent.

In my own experience as a US senator in the 1970s, I saw how the lobby tries to humiliate or embarrass members who do not toe the line. (….Full Article Here)

Marc Lemire’s Constitutional Challenge of Internet Censorship to be heard January/February in Toronto

By Paul Fromm
January 23, 2007

The “Human Rights” Enforcers are toast! The culmination of three years of research will be brought down on the censors, across 20 hearing days in Toronto. Headed up by lead defence counsel and courageous civil liberties lawyer Barbara Kulaszka, we are going to bring down the most serious challenge the Canadian Human Rights Act has ever faced.

Doug Christie has also intervened on behalf of freedom of speech and will be at the hearing, in his finest form! The defence team includes, three world-renowned expert witnesses, including Dr. Michael Persinger, who is right now on TVO being voted on as 1 of the top 10 best University Lecturers in Canada! Other experts include, the computer/internet genius Bernard Klatt and Professor Donald Downs from the University of Wisconsin. Fact witnesses will include, Canada’s leading internet freedom fighter – Paul Fromm.

Opposing Barbara Kulaszka and Doug Christie will be the thought-control fanatics at the Canadian Human Rights Commission, who pretend to represent the “general public” interests. Others at the hearing will be complainant Richard Warman, Federal Attorney General of Canada, Canadian Jewish Congress, Bnai Brith and the Simon Wiesenthal Centre.

Please come by the hearing and show your support. We must stand together and in a united voice denounce the “Human Rights” Commission, this horrible law and their apparatchiks’ that enforce it. Your presence in the hearing will show beyond a doubt that Canadians are interested in preserving Freedom of Speech and that we are not going to sit idly by as – what some describe as “hick tribunals” – rule that truth is no defence, that intent is no defence and that any sort of fairness for defendants is verboten! …

Source: Paul Fromm / Marc Lemire

Hillary the Favorite in Race for Jewish Donations
Biden, Obama Expected to Make Some Inroads

By E.J. Kessler
January 23, 2007

New York’s junior senator, Hillary Rodham Clinton, is expected to snare the lion’s share of the Jewish community’s substantial political donations in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

Democratic activists and operatives said Clinton will pull in large quantities of cash among Jewish donors not only because of what they described as her strong positions on Israel and domestic matters of interest to Jews, but also because of longtime ties with these activists dating back to her husband’s administration.

The haul is important: Strategists say that serious candidates will need to raise at least $50 million — and probably more like $100 million — by the end of the year. They say that money from Jewish donors constitutes about half the donations given to national Democratic candidates (an extremely large pot of gelt long coveted by the GOP). (….Full Article Here)

Iran’s President Did Not Say “Israel must be wiped off the map”
by Arash Norouzi

A introductory commentary by David Duke–
As America gets closer and closer to a catastrophic war with Iran, the justification for proposing this insane war for Israel is that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said that he will “wipe Israel off the map.” This colossal lie is combined with the lie that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. The implication is that unless Israel, the United States, or both attack Iran — that Iran will use nuclear weapons to create a “Holocaust” against the Jewish people of Israel.

First, as these excerpts from Arash Norouzi show clearly, the Iranian president said no such thing. He said he believed there would be regime change in Israel just as he specifically referred to the fact there was regime change in the Soviet Union. Obviously the people of Russia were not genocided by the regime change, they were liberated by it! Furthermore, he did not threaten that he would attack Israel or that he would make this regime change, he simply said he believed that a the Zionist regime would be ended. In a speech I heard in his presence in Tehran, the President was again quoted as saying he would “wipe Israel off the map.” That too was another big lie. In actual fact, he said once more that he believed the Zionist regime would fall as the Soviet Regime did in Russia. He specifically said that the civil and human rights of both Jews and Palestinians must be protected. In addition, on the matter of nuclear energy the Iranian President has repeatedly stated that his government will not pursue nuclear weapons. Iran has been a member of the UN covenants on nuclear energy and has allowed inspections of its facilities to show that it makes peaceful use of nuclear power generation. The head of the UN inspectors has also said he has seen no evidence of Iran having a nuclear weapons program. (more…)

Political Prisoner Ernst Zundel On Prison Restrictions & Spies
A So-Called Modern Democracy Uses SOVIET Tactics To Suppress A Prisoner’s Rights

January 22, 2007

You have not heard from me for a long time, because the restrictions to my mail have now been in place since 07/07/2005 and 07/14/2005. I am still imited to the two letters in and out a day, weekdays and all printed items are taken out regardless of language and topic. They could be NEW YORK TIMES articles about art or medicine, not just with political content. All are taken out. They fear the exchange of even popularly available information,the same way the devil fears holy water. Last week, I received letters, one from Munich, that was mailed August 2, 2005; another one the same day, came from the area of Berlin, mailed on the 20th of April 2006; another one from someone near Cologne was sent May 12, 2006. Several came from July 2006. So,you can see, to carry on correspondence is a bit like Russian Roulette, with a fully loaded revolver! That explains why it’s almost useless to ask for an answer to questions about anything relevant!

I had asked Barbara for a number of documents, last summer! She promptly assembled them, sent them 958 grams worth $17.00 airmail. They were confiscated, translated to the tune of approximately $1000.00, which will be billed to me once the case is lost and then they were kept, for almost a year. It took repeated requests over the year til finally it was released to us. They were newspaper articles, mentioned my name 191 pages, obviously some seem to be missing. Still it gives you an idea about the altitudes which prevail here, about freedoms generally! But this was only to explain to you the situation to you that has been my fate since I have gotten here. There is an absolute fear to confront certain topics in this country, which would disturb the preconceived notions, upon which this system was constructed. There is a very large circulation newspaper called Sud Deutsche Zeitung. (more…)

The Israeli “Art Student” Mystery
For almost two years, hundreds of young Israelis falsely claiming to be art students haunted federal offices — in particular, the DEA. No one knows why — and no one seems to want to find out.

By Christopher Ketcham

May 7, 2002 | In January 2001, the security branch of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency began to receive a number of peculiar reports from DEA field offices across the country. According to the reports, young Israelis claiming to be art students and offering artwork for sale had been attempting to penetrate DEA offices for over a year. The Israelis had also attempted to penetrate the offices of other law enforcement and Department of Defense agencies. Strangest of all, the “students” had visited the homes of numerous DEA officers and other senior federal officials.

As a pattern slowly emerged, the DEA appeared to have been targeted in what it called an “organized intelligence gathering activity.” But to what end, and for whom, no one knew.

Reports of the mysterious Israelis with an inexplicable interest in peddling art to G-men came in from more than 40 U.S. cities and continued throughout the first six months of 2001. Agents of the DEA, ATF, Air Force, Secret Service, FBI, and U.S. Marshals Service documented some 130 separate incidents of “art student” encounters. Some of the Israelis were observed diagramming the inside of federal buildings. Some were found carrying photographs they had taken of federal agents. One was discovered with a computer printout in his luggage that referred to “DEA groups.”

In some cases, the Israelis visited locations not known to the public — areas without street addresses, for example, or DEA offices not identified as such — leading authorities to suspect that information had been gathered from prior surveillance or perhaps electronically, from credit cards and other sources. One Israeli was discovered holding banking receipts for substantial sums of money, close to $180,000 in withdrawals and deposits over a two-month period. A number of the Israelis resided for a period of time in Hollywood, Fla. — the small city where Mohammed Atta and three terrorist comrades lived for a time before Sept. 11.

(more…)

Only Impeachment Can Prevent More War

By Paul Craig Roberts
January 21st, 2007

Everyone knows that Bush’s Iraq ’surge’ will not work. Even the authors of the plan, neoconservatives Frederick Kagan and Jack Keane, have emphasized that the plan cannot work with any less than an addition of 50,000 US troops committed to another three years of combat. Bush is only adding 40% of that number of troops, and Defense Secretary Gates speaks of the operation being over by summer’s end.

On January 18 a panel of retired generals testifying on Capitol Hill slammed Bush’s surge plan as “a fool’s errand.” Even the easily bamboozled American public knows the plan will not work. Newsweek’s latest poll released January 20 shows that only 23% of the public support sending more troops to Iraq and that twice as many Americans trust the Democrats in Congress than trust Bush.

A majority of Americans (54%) believe Bush to be neither honest nor ethical, and 57% believe that Bush lacks ’strong leadership qualities.’

Nevertheless, Bush defended his surge plan, telling a group of TV stations last week, “I believe it will work.”

Bush is correct that it will work–indeed, the surge is working. We have to be clear about how the plan works. It does not mean that 21,500 more US troops will bring order and stability to Iraq. The surge is working, because it is deflecting attention from the Bush Regime’s real game plan…

 
Read the whole article on V-DARE

EU, U.S. shocked by assassination of Turkish journalist
By David Duke

The United States and the EU have expressed shock at the murder of the Armenian Turkish journalist Hrant Dink.

I am surprised that they are shocked. The fact is that major EU member states such as France and Germany support intolerance of intellectually dissident viewpoints, a climate of intolerance that can lead to the imprisonment and even murder of free speech advocates.

Political Leaders in the United States and in the E.U. have supported the idea that freedom of speech should not be allowed for what they call “offensive speech.” In reality, the “offensive speech” they refer to is not speech related to obscenity or advocacy of violence, but simply dissident speech of an intellectual manner against the establishment point of view. In Turkey, “hate speech” is saying a Holocaust did happen (the Armenian genocide). In Europe it is saying that a Holocaust didn’t (being a quote “Holocaust denier” is defined as simply questioning any part of the officially sanctioned Second World War “Holocaust” story”).

Recently, a member of the European Parliament from France, Dr. Bruno Gollnisch, was sentenced to three months in prison (suspended), not for arguing against any part of the Holocaust story, but for simply saying that he believes that historians should debate and decide the matter. He was also fined 5000 Euros and will made to pay an additional 60,000 Euros to publicize his conviction. (more…)

The Israel Lobby Trips and Tilts

By Alexander Cockburn
January 20th, 2006

Suppose the movers and shakers in the Israel lobby here — Abe Foxman, Alan Dershowitz and the rest of the crew — had simply decided to leave Jimmy Carter’s Palestine Peace Not Apartheid alone. How long before the book would have been gathering dust on the remainder shelves? Suppose even that Dershowitz had rounded up his unacknowledged co-authors in all their tens of thousands and sallied forth to buy up every copy of Carter’s book and toss each one into the Charles River, would not that have been a more successful suppressor than the blitzkrieg strategy they did adopt?

Of course it would. For weeks now the lobby has hurled its legions into battle against Carter. He has been stigmatized as an anti-Semite, a Holocaust denier, a patron of former concentration camp killers, a Christian madman, a pawn of the Arabs who “flatly condones mass murder” of Israeli Jews. (This last was from Murdoch’s New York Post editorial, relayed to its mailing list by the Zionist Organization of America.)

Any day now I expect some janitors at the Carter Center to resign, declaring that they can no longer in all conscience mop bathrooms that might have been used by the former President, their letter of protest duly front-paged by the New York Times, just like the famous fourteen members of the Carter Center’s Board of Councilors. Actually there were, at the time of resignations, 224 people on this board, where membership is mostly a thank you for a financial donation to the center. So the headlines could be saying, “Nearly 95 per cent of Carter Center Board Members Back Former President.”…..

Read the whole article on Counterpunch

War in Iraq for Israel will cost US Tax Payers 8 Billion a Month

As you’re sitting there playing your Nintendo or whatever videogame is popular this year, bear in mind that those kids you fathered will be paying for your lethargy the rest of their natural lives.
 

Pentagon Sees US War Cost in Iraq Rising

By Richard Cowan
January 19th, 2007

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The steadily rising Iraq war price tag will reach about $8.4 billion a month this year, Pentagon spokesmen said on Thursday, as heavy replacement costs for lost, destroyed and aging equipment mount.

The Pentagon has been estimating last year’s costs for the increasingly unpopular war at about $8 billion a month, having increased from a monthly “burn rate” of around $4.4 billion during the first year of fighting in fiscal 2003.

During testimony at a House Budget Committee hearing, Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England said that nearly four years into the war, the Pentagon’s war costs were rising because it was having to replace big-ticket items such as helicopters, airplanes and armored vehicles that are wearing out or were lost in combat. (….Full Article Here)

 
Source: Politically Correct Apostate

New U.S. Congress Shaping Up to Promote Israel Over All

By Robert L. Johnson
January 19th, 2007

With Bush announcing he is escalating the war in Iraq, a war he and his neocon warmonger buddies started in order to promote the neocon dream of Israel over all and to promote Bush’s political career, it appears the government is going to take Americans further down the dark and deadly road required to build and guarantee a Greater Israel of Biblical proportions.

Many people thought that by playing the government shell game of voting in the Democrats, they were doing something good. Realistic people, however, realize the Democrats and Republicans are just two different masks for the same monstrosity–kosher government.

To quote the global news service of the Jewish People, JTA:

“No one denies that the Republican-led US House of Representatives, in power from 1995 until 2006, was overwhelmingly pro-Israel. But with Democratic wins in both houses, the 110th Congress removes from power several maverick Republicans who wanted the United States to be more critical of Israel, and boosts to leadership lawmakers who are not just Israel-friendly but intimately acquainted with the US Jewish community.”

Can you imagine the nerve of “maverick” US Congressmen daring to be critical of Israel?! Don’t they know that according to the book the ancient Jews wrote, the Bible, we, the Gentiles, are here on earth to serve the Jews, who are “above all people that are upon the face of the earth”?

The JTA article goes on to mention the many ways the 110th Congress is putting Israel’s interests above all other interests. It mentions Democratic Representative from Maryland, Steny Hoyer, who was chosen to be the majority leader. Hoyer, the article boasts, “is on a first-name basis with much of the board of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and has been to Israel multiple times, exhibiting broad knowledge of its political workings.” (more…)

Gollnisch Fined for Words
Against the law to ask questions

January 18th, 2007

LYON, France (Reuters) - A French court handed a leading far-right French politician a three-month suspended jail sentence and fined him 5,000 euros ($6,500) on Thursday for questioning the Holocaust.

The Lyon court found Bruno Gollnisch, No. 2 in the far-right National Front party, had “disputed a crime against humanity” in remarks he made during a news conference in the eastern French city on October 11, 2004.

The judge also ordered Gollnisch to pay 55,000 euros in damages to the plaintiffs, and to pay for the judgment to be published in the newspapers that originally printed his remarks.

Gollnisch was not in court for the verdict because he was attending a session of the European Parliament, where he recently became the leader of a new far-right political group called Identity, Tradition and Sovereignty.

In its ruling the court said Gollnisch had called into question the number of Jews killed during World War Two and whether gas chambers had been used to kill them.

“Historians have the right to discuss the number of deaths and the way that they died. Fifty years after the facts we can discuss the real number of deaths,” Gollnisch was quoted as saying at the time.

He also said that the “existence of the gas chambers is for historians to discuss.” (….Full Article Here)

 
Reference links:

Dr. Duke comments on this miscarriage of justice:

Jewish Supremacists Seek to Imprison Parliamentarian for Defending Free Speech!

 
Also hear David’s powerful 2005 broadcast covering Bruno’s case:

Rep. Duke’s November 28, 2005 Broadcast or Download.
– David comments on Free Speech, his trip to Syria and answers emails!