Left, The cover of the International Red Cross Official Reports on the Holocaust. Revisionists point out that that the Red Cross, including a number of officials from the U.S., Britain, France, and Switzerland, inspected the German concentration camps (including Auschwitz) during the height of the holocaust. They interviewed thousands of prisoners and delivered thousands of packages to them. They were asked to investigate rumors of mass killings and gassings. After their investigation they reported back to the American government that they found no a trace of evidence of any mass killings, but they did say in their reports that they had found terrible loss of life from epidemics and lack of supplies caused by the war.

Why Do We Need Free Speech on the Holocaust?

Here is a letter that is typical of the type I receive from some Jews on my demand that we have free speech on the Holocaust. The obscenities against me were deleted but other than that the letter is complete. You will also find a thought-provoking response compiled by our staff. –David Duke

To Davidduke.com:

Are there really no limits to freedom of speech? If someone was to parade around naked outside, they would be arrested, right?

Freedom of speech has its limitations too. Besides, if David Duke is such a champion for freedom of speech, why isn’t he campaigning for other countries where freedom of speech is denied? Why is he only concerned about freedom of speech regarding this one issue? furthermore, why is he flying to Iran and lending credence to a government that has been one of the worst violators of human rights (read some of the articles about how many websites and newspapers are banned in Iran that don’t agree with the government). If I was to say the revolutionary war is a myth, and try speaking publicly that it was a conspiracy to give America credibility, would that be okay with you? — Israel B.

To Israel B.

Intellectual speech on an historical event is not the same as someone parading around outside naked.

In our response, We will not say that the Holocaust did not happen exactly as you and the mainstream authorities claim that it did. We will simply relate what the revisionist scholars say, and it will be up to you and other readers of Davidduke.com to judge whether their arguments have merit.

Historical or forensic research on controversial issues is considered normal about any other historical event and for any crime, even the murder of a single person. It is quite shocking to learn that there has been an almost complete absence of forensic evidence on what was supposedly the greatest mass murder of all time, the Holocaust with a capital “H.” At the Nuremberg tribunal that was intended by the victors to document and prove German murder, the autopsy records of not even a single victim’s remains were released. There were no plans, pictures, or forensic analysis of any of the alleged gas chambers presented. In every criminal prosecution of even one victim, forensic evidence of the cause of death, (proof that a murder occurred) and the murder weapon is absolutely essential. (more…)