Professor MacDonald Discusses the Illegal Immigration Crisis

Renowned group evolutionary psychologist and immigration researcher, Dr. Kevin MacDonald, discusses the history of U.S. immigration policy and the effect that Jewish organizations have had on influencing our immigration laws over the past hundred years.

Kevin also examines the negative impact that massive immigration is having on Euro-American group interests.

This sobering presentation was compiled from video clips originally featured on Byron Jost’s powerful 1 hr 41 min documentary, The Line In The Sand, and has been abbreviated down to a 30 minute segment for easier viewing and to highlight Kevin’s contribution.

 Kevin’s commentary is accompanied by video footage from other eminent anti-immigration activists and is interspersed with some crazy La Raza demo footage that is sure to motivate any viewer from the general public to quit worrying about sports scores, to put down the comic books, and go out and join Numbers USA and the Minuteman Project — Staff
 

MacDonald Video on the Jewish Influence Behind Immigration 
(click F11 key to enlarge screen size)

Left, Leon Trotsky, the Communist mass murderer revered by all the founders of Neoconservatism!

Only in an America, a nation where Jewish supremacy reigns in politics and media, could the worshipers of a Communist mass murderer, Leon Trotsky, come to control conservatism. The so-called Neoconservatives are not Neo-conservatives but Neo-Marxists whose founding leadership (such as Neo-conservative founding father, Leo Strauss) were all devotees of Jewish Bolshevism.  –David Duke

The Fraud of Neoconservative “Anti-Communism”
by Max Shpak

Neoconservatives and their apologists would have the public believe that the neocons were former Leftists who saw the light and came to reject liberal or Marxist ideology as a matter of conviction and principle. Regrettably, this official line has come to be conventional wisdom, no doubt reflecting neocon efforts to hide the fact that their transformation was neither sincerely motivated nor sincerely enacted. To understand the real agenda that drove and continues to drive much of neoconservatism, one needs to look back to the origins of the movement and the cultural backgrounds of those who lead it.

It is a well-established fact that many of the early luminaries of neoconservatism (most famously Irving Kristol in the 1940’s, a more recent famous example being David Horowitz) came from Marxist backgrounds, and that neoconservatism (like Marxism itself) began and continues to be a largely a phenomenon of Jewish intellectualism. In the early part of the 20th century, Marxism attracted a disproportionate pool of Jewish recruits for a number of obvious reasons. There are a number of complex psychological and social reasons for the attraction, all of which largely stem from the fact that Marxist internationalism is an ideology which by its very nature finds disciples among a rootless, anti-religious urban intelligentsia.

More important for the purposes of this analysis, however, are the practical reasons for Jewish sympathy with Bolshevism. European and American Jews alike carried deep-seated hatreds for the traditional regimes and religions of the European continent, particularly Czarist Russia and various Eastern European nations due to (real and imagined) “persecution” and “pogroms” that occurred there. Thus, when the Bolsheviks overthrew the Czar, destroyed the hated Orthodox Church, rendered powerless the landed religious peasantry, and replaced traditional Russian authority with a largely Jewish Commissariate, world Jewry (including alleged “capitalists” like the Schiffs and Rothschilds) embraced the Revolution and Marxist ideology alike. (more…)