The Conservatism of Fools: A Response to John Derbyshire (1)

By Dr. Kevin MacDonald (2)

March, 2003

This is a response to a review by John Derbyshire of my book, The Culture of Critique, that appeared in The American Conservative. In an earlier article, Derbyshire described himself as philo-Semite who traces his attitudes on Jews to his pleasant childhood memories of a local Jewish family and “the numberless kindnesses that I have received at the hands of Jews, friendships I treasure and lessons I have learnt. I cherish those recollections.”3

I find myself now, in middle age, with complicated and sometimes self-contradictory feelings about the Jews. Those early impressions — culture, wit, intelligence, kindness, and hospitality — are still dominant, and I have read enough to know what a stupendous debt our civilization owes to the Jews. At the same time, there are aspects of distinctly Jewish ways of thinking that I dislike very much. The world-perfecting idealism, for example, that is rooted in the most fundamental premises of Judaism, has, it seems to me, done great harm in the modern age…. I also find the theories of Kevin Macdonald (The Culture of Critique) about the partly malign influence of Jews on modern American culture very persuasive — though this is not an endorsement of Macdonald’s theory of “group evolutionary strategies” which I do not understand. And like (I suppose) every other Gentile, I have often been irritated by Jewish sensibilities, and occasionally angered by them.4

These earlier comments on The Culture of Critique appeared in April, 2001. Derbyshire’s evaluation of the book (and its author) has changed a bit, perhaps because the edition reviewed in The American Conservative contains a new preface that tilts the balance in my writing even more on the side of the negative. (more…)

Burned alive women and children in Dresden, Germany 1945. They were victims of a Holocaust in the most accurate of terms: the intentional firebombing and burning alive of hundreds of thousands German women and children in the cities of Germany during the Second World War. It is a Holocaust that receives not even a whisper in the world’s media.

Atrocity Gods
About the proposed EU Holocaust Denial Law

By Ashley Howes

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” George Orwell, “1984″

If the EU is going to craft new ‘Holocaust Denial’ legislation, surely it must first be defined. Mainly it is used to label those who, in the opinion of the one using the term, minimize the suffering of Jewish Holocaust victims and thereby foster the potential for future state-organized mass murder. The imagery of the über-industrial Holocaust is so gut-wrenchingly horrific that anyone challenging the story is deemed criminally guilty of intent to incite racial hatred or civic disorder.

The subjectivity involved in evaluating intent explains the many glaring examples of double standards surrounding the ‘holocaust denial’ controversy. For example: the ‘establishment’ historian Raul Hilberg states that the number of those murdered in Auschwitz was not four but one million, whilst the total number of Jews who died in WW II was not six but five million. When he makes such revisions, this is not considered ‘denial’. Yet when an ‘unapproved’ historian such as David Irving cites the same figures or, for example, that the gas chamber at Auschwitz is a post-war Soviet construction, during his trial in Austria he was not allowed to bring in the Auschwitz director to testify because no question regarding the truth or falsehood of any aspect of the Holocaust was allowed. In most courts where such cases are tried, there is virtually no defense against ‘denial’ accusations even if the revision in question is generally agreed-upon by ‘non-denier’ Holocaust historians. (more…)

A brilliant Response to Gilad Atzmon

The following letter was written by a Davidduke.com reader to Gilad Atzmon in response to his recent article. It is such an excellent letter I want to share it with all our readers. — David duke

Dear Mr. Gilad Atzmon,

I just read your essay “The Open Society and its Enemies — The Story of Auschwitz” ….I must say, it was rather brilliant. Politics serves as the ulterior motive for a new socio-psychology called “Political Correctness” that drives, among other things, the religion of the Holocaust. This leftist political strategy has been and continues to be the destruction (deconstruction) of Western identity (especially Christian and white racial identity). This strategy serves to facilitate the overall goal of a controllable society and the socialist Utopian dream.

“Political Correctness” serves as the overriding context for the religion of the Holocaust…not the other way around (as you seem to argue). I agree with you for the most part, but here is where we disagree. First, I am not a Jew, and you are. Most Jews, reform, orthodox, atheist or otherwise, have a very strong ethnic identity. You don’t seem to be a very ethnocentric Jew, but even still, your arguments steer clear of the affect of Jewish ethnocentrism on the development of Leftist ideology, political correctness, and the propaganda which has systematically destroyed Western identity, traditions, values, mores, and norms. (more…)

Conyers Introduces New Hate Bill

By Rev. Ted Pike
March 21st, 2007
Ted Pike Interview

(more…)