3/20/2007

AIPAC: Hotbed of Treason

Posted under: — @ 12:22 am
Email This Post Print This Post

zionist-snake.jpgThe AIPAC Conference: A Hotbed of Treason — Updated!

By David Duke

“Treason as a concept is defunct in the West. To succeed in war, governments need take this change into account.” –Daniel Pipes, a leading Jewish extremist Neocon in the United States.

Daniel Pipes is right: treason is a defunct concept in the United States and the West. Because treason to Zionism is so widespread and common, it is not called treason anymore.

It reminds me of the quotation, “Where treason prospers, none dare call it treason.”

Recently, AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) had its annual confab in Washington, D.C. The Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA) reported that it drew the leaders of both parties, Democrat and Republican, to genuflect at the altar of Israel.

No other lobby on Capitol Hill is as powerful as AIPAC; no other lobby could come close to its bipartisan power. Here is a quote from the JTA article:

The March 12 gala dinner drew half the U.S. Senate and more than half the House. It featured addresses by Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.), the Senate majority leader, and Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), its minority leader.

The next morning, Pelosi (speaker of the House) and Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio), the House minority leader, headlined the traditional Tuesday-morning sendoff to the Capitol for a day of lobbying.

Make no mistake: AIPAC is a lobby for a foreign country, for the interests of a foreign country. The JTA pointed out that the Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, spoke by satellite to the conference and that his main point was, to quote JTA, that “the equation promoted by those who support continuing the war is simple: Israel’s security requires a continued U.S. presence in Iraq, and questioning President Bush’s policy is tantamount to undermining Israel and the United States.” (more…)


3/19/2007

Update on Marc Lemire’s Freedomsite Constitutional Challenge

Posted under: — @ 5:43 am
Email This Post Print This Post

Stormfront Under Attack By Canadian Tribunal Witness

By Paul Fromm
March 18th 2007

Dear Free Speech Supporter:

The Stormfront Community of White nationalists worldwide, over 100,000 strong, is under attack in testimony to be given tomorrow by Karen Mock, a child psychologist, who is to testify as an “expert witness” for the Canadian Human Rights Commission in webmaster Marc Lemire’s Internet free speech hearing which resumes at the Novotel Hotel in Mississauga.

Mr. Lemire has launched a constitutional challenge against Canada’s notorious Sec. 13.1 of the Canadian Human Rights Act — the Internet censorship law, where truth and intent are no defence.

In a supplementary expert report filed last week, Mock, who has scarfed up more than a million dollars over the years in government grants for anti-racist work writes:

“Extensive research by the Anti-Defamation League has concluded there are three important measurable respects in which the ‘electronic community of hate’ [’Hate’ is nowhere defined, but would seem to be “the views that the Israel Firsters at the ADL don’t like.”] strengthens the world of right-wing extremists off-line. (more…)


3/18/2007

Crime Linked, Jewish Advocacy Organization is Enabling Illegal Immigration!

Posted under: — @ 11:50 pm
Email This Post Print This Post

While Israel enforces some of the toughest anti-immigration laws in the world to protect the Jewish people, we see organized Jewry here in America working relentlessly over the past century to open up our own borders to uncontrolled immigration. This disturbing report below provides insight as to what the ADL is planning to do next in order to futher step up their treasonous policies. – Staff

For ADL, Another Mission
Group will combat anti-immigrant bias

By Yvonne Abraham
March 17th, 2007

The Anti-Defamation League of New England, saying that hostility toward immigrants represents a growing form of intolerance, is making the fight against anti-immigrant sentiment a significant focus of the 60-year-old organization.

Leaders of the ADL, which is known primarily for its efforts to combat anti-Semitism, say they are alarmed at the animus toward immigrants that seems to be surfacing as the debate over securing the country’s borders intensifies.

Andrew Tarsy, regional director of the ADL of New England, said recent events in immigrant communities around Boston demonstrate the urgency for more activism.

“We fight against bigotry in all forms,” Tarsy said. “It has become clear both in the extremist world and even in the mainstream that the conversation about immigrants is laced with bigotry.”

The efforts will take several forms: events to reach out directly to immigrants; advocacy on state and local immigrant issues; monitoring hate activity in communities; and meeting with police chiefs to alert them to possible tensions in their communities over immigrants. (….Full Article Here) or (Here)

Quote: “The ADL, among the most influential civil rights organization in the region, has been working alongside immigrants’ rights groups to stem the expansion of state and local powers to enforce immigration laws, such as former Governor Mitt Romney’s push to authorize State Police to arrest people who are here illegally.”

Staff

3/17/2007

Zundel’s “racist” offense: Saying Israel is a “Refuge for World Gangsterism”

Posted under: — @ 2:15 pm
Email This Post Print This Post

Free Ernst Zundel. FREE HIM NOW!Oh My God. Ernst Zundel said Israel is “a place of refuge for world gangsterism!”
By Curt Maynard

Get a rope! Can you believe it? Ernst Zundel actually said Israel; our charming, beloved, ally in the Middle East is “a place of refuge for world gangsterism.” What will he say next, that Israel is the very cause of the worst problems in the Mid East today, or that Israel has a Fifth Column firmly entrenched in the governmental and media apparatuses of numerous western nations? Oi Vey NO!

That’s right, Ernst Zundel, famous free speech advocate, pacifist, human rights activist and holocaust skeptic has been denounced by the German Judge, Ulrich Meinerzhagen, who convicted and sentenced him for five years for expressing his opinions. In a magazine interview, the Judge referred to Zundel as “inflammatory, racist agitator” for simply saying that Israel is a “refuge for world gangsterism.” Yep, that’s it, that’s all. According to Spiegel Online, the “illustrious” judge Meinerzhagen, “to illustrate his point, read passages from Zündel’s racist and anti-Semitic writings, [and all he could come up with was that Zundel had] called Israel “a place of refuge for world gangsterism.” (more…)


Ron Paul’s Grassroots Campaign Raises $500,000 “With Very Little Effort” !

Posted under: — @ 12:05 am
Email This Post Print This Post

Ron Paul Formally Announces Presidential Candidacy on CSPAN  

CSPAN: Representative Ron Paul a Republican of Texas, you’ve formed a presidential exploratory committee on February 19th, are you running for President?

Ron Paul: Yes I am, I will file the papers today to become an official candidate.

CSPAN: And why?

Ron Paul: Well the exploratory committee is set up mainly to find out if there would be support. To tell you the truth I was rather reluctant to set up that committee. I was urged to do it and I did it, and I was pleasantly surprised to find the numbers of people who have responded. And the fund raising went very well, so I’ve been very encouraged and I think that a lot of people want to hear my message and I’m willing to deliver it.

CSPAN: You have gained quite a presence on the web, and why is that?

Ron Paul: Well I don’t know exactly why, but it was a nice surprise (laughs). Because you know that first announcement was sort of premature and came rather quickly, and all I can say is that I am aware of the web, and I use it, but I thought that was like lightning speed all of a sudden it was all over the place. And it was spontaneous, it raised a lot of money, and I though well this is interesting as a true grassroots campaign and so far the amount of money raised isn’t competitive with those establishment candidates who will raise a hundred million dollars. But with the Internet and with the amount of money, and the enthusiasm, I think that we can become very competitive.

CSPAN: How much money have you raised?

Ron Paul: Last month or so it was over $500,000 dollars and it was done with very little effort, and that was probably the most encouraging thing about the campaign…………

 
 View Rep. Ron Paul’s Interview on CSPAN, Here or Here 

Staff

3/16/2007

Canada’s Hate Laws that Protect Hate and Criminalize Free Speech!

Posted under: — @ 12:15 am
Email This Post Print This Post

chabad191.jpgLeft: Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretein with Jewish extremist Chabad Lubavitch leaders

Canada’s Hate Laws that Protect Hate and Criminalize Free Speech!

By Harmony Grant

If you swallow the Anti-Defamation League’s line, you’d think that in Canada, where Christians are less free to express themselves, Jews would also be less free. But this isn’t the case. Jews are more upfront about their ethnic ties in this nation where Christianity is more virulently suppressed and denied free expression of conscience. The ADL’s proudest accomplishment—“anti-hate” federal laws in Canada and most of Europe—has produced the opposite of universal liberty: freedom for a privileged few.

If you swallow the Anti-Defamation League’s line, you’d think that in Canada, where Christians are less free to express themselves, Jews would also be less free. But this isn’t the case. Jews are more upfront about their ethnic ties in this nation where Christianity is more virulently suppressed and denied free expression of conscience. The ADL’s proudest accomplishment—“anti-hate” federal laws in Canada and most of Europe—has produced the opposite of universal liberty: freedom for a privileged few.  In a fascinating article published in Jewish Political Studies Review (11:3-4, 1999), Irwin Otler contrasts Jewish activism in Canada with its counterpart in the United States. He argues that Canadian Jewish organizations differ from their American counterparts in that they more freely assert their ethnic “tribal” identity. For instance, they seek government support of Jewish religious schools. (more…)


3/15/2007

David Irving’s Speech to Hungarians: Let Freedom Ring!

Posted under: — @ 12:15 am
Email This Post Print This Post

YOUR INVISIBLE CURSOR POP UP MESSAGE HERE
David Irving with translator György Kádár speak to a crowd of thousands at Heroes’ Square, Budapest 3/15/07

Speech by David Irving, Budapest, March 15, 2007

Action Report Online

“I BRING you greetings from all the friends of Hungary in my country England.

From the Hungarians who live in England - and there are many who fled from the communist regime in 1956 - and from all your friends and admirers, and there are many of these too.

There is one ugly truth — and it is a bitter truth — which links our two great countries: we now both have prime ministers who lie.

One of them, my own prime minister, Tony Blair, has so far still to confess it.

These are bad times for freedom. Perhaps one day Englishmen like me will be seeking freedom in Hungary!

Because the lights of freedom, — the right to think what we like, to say what we think, and to print and publish what we say — are slowly dimming, as the ugly light of enforced socialism is dawning again.

I know what I am saying.

Governments do not like historians, and they like those of us who write Real History even less.

They prefer the kind of writer they can buy with money, or bribe with knighthoods and peerages.

You know that something is foul with your own government, when you see it bringing in two hundred foreign police troops to help it stay in power.

You know then that your government is, in real history, in the hands of a foreign power.

(more…)


3/14/2007

Interview with EU Parliamentarian Bruno Gollnisch

Posted under: — @ 3:09 pm
Email This Post Print This Post

bruno-gollnisch.jpg

Watch this fascinating Interview with EU lawmaker Bruno Gollnisch

By David Duke

I met Dr. Bruno Gollnisch a few years ago at his home near Lyon, France. A professor of Classics at the University of Lyon and a leader in the National Front, Dr. Gollnisch was newly elected to the EU, a position he still holds. The professor is a paragon of civility, but he has come to understand that unchecked immigration will constitute the destruction of European heritage and freedom. Dr. Gollnisch will not politely sit by while our European heritage is wiped away in France, the EU, and in the rest of the Western world.

Because of his principled stand, he has faced unrelenting persecution and character assassination. It was one of the most thrilling days of my life when he led me onto the floor of the European Parliament in Strasbourg, for I felt honored that Dr. Gollnisch would announce in this way that I, as hated by the media as I am, was his friend. It is great to know that there are some bigger-than-life personalties who will not choose friends or enemies by the pronouncements of a racist media that seeks to destroy the heritage and rights of the European-American people. On that day, Dr. Gollnisch introduced me to Jean Marie LePen, and LePen then also proudly introduced me around the EU Parliament and invited me to a private dinner that evening. LePen and I discussed almost every critical issue facing our people. I can assure you that he is as fully knowledgable and committed as I am on the issues dear to my heart. We formed a friendship and understanding that has endured to this day, and I believe it will continue after he is, as we hope, elected France’s next president. He is now an official candidate and his chances this time are vastly improved because of the immigrant unrest that wracked France this last year. (more…)


3/13/2007

The Latest in a Long String of Scandals for Israeli Leadership

Posted under: — @ 6:08 am
Email This Post Print This Post

The Israeli Ambassador to El Salvador, Tsuriel Raphael, has been recalled after he was found bound, drunk and naked. Naked, drunk, surrounded by sex toys — it’s the Israeli ambassador

Rory Carroll
March 13, 2007
The Guardian

As an Israeli ambassador, Tsuriel Raphael was accomplished at putting a gloss on delicate subjects, be it Tel Aviv’s nuclear programme, the treatment of Palestinians or the invasion of Lebanon.

When San Salvador police discovered him in his official embassy residence yard in the capital San Salvador, however, smooth talk was not really an option. For starters there was the gag and the rubber ball in his mouth. There was also the matter of being drunk. And naked. And bound. And surrounded by sex toys.

Once he was untied and the gag and ball were removed Mr Raphael identified himself as the ambassador but for perhaps the first time in his diplomatic career, this was a crisis he could not explain away. (….Full Article Here)
 

Also see:

Brazil Links Israeli Consul To Child Prostitution Ring

Staff

3/10/2007

Would You Invite David Duke to Your Campus?

Posted under: — @ 2:48 pm
Email This Post Print This Post

dershowitz.jpgWould You invite David Duke to Your Campus?

Alan Dershowitz Tries to Suppress Free Speech.

Better questions might be:

“Shouldn’t there be freedom of speech on campus?”

“Should a tiny minority of Zionist extremists be able to censor debate on important issues?”

Torture advocate and Jewish extremist Alan Dershowitz has started a campaign to keep Dr. Norman Finkelstein from speaking on university campuses. His recent article, “Would You Invite David Duke to Your Campus?” says that inviting Dr. Norman Finkelstein is like inviting Dr. David Duke. Obviously, Finkelstein and Duke have strongly differing views on many subjects, but the obvious retort to Dershowitz should be:

Why should Alan Dershowitz and the extremist supporters of Israel be able to dictate whom college students are allowed to hear? What’s wrong with hearing a major international personality expressing his ideas? Is Dershowitz suggesting that Dr. Duke is too persuasive, or his documents are too convincing? Or could it be that Dershowitz sees college students as not intelligent enough to hear David Duke and make up their own minds?”

Of course, the right answer for people like Finkelstein to come back with would be an “in your face” response of, “Isn’t that what academic freedom is supposed to be all about, the right to invite controversial political personalities like David Duke?”

(more…)


No Free Speech in Switzerland!

Posted under: — @ 7:12 am
Email This Post Print This Post

censorship.gif

Swiss court finds Turkish politician guilty of racism for denying
Armenian genocide

If you want proof of the insanity of Holocaust anti-free speech laws and the repression of freedom to which they have led in many areas, read the following quotes from a news report out of Switzerland.

Switzerland has just prosecuted a prominent Turkish politician for expressing his opinion that the term “genocide” is inappropriate to describe the crimes against Armenians during the First World War. Dogu Perincek believes that there was no intentional genocide of Armenians, but that the high death toll was a result of a number of factors. Whatever the ultimate truth of the matter, certainly freedom of research, speech, and opinion is vital.

There is no way that Europe and America can criticize the Turkish law that forbids using the word “genocide” with regard to the Armenian deaths in First World War-era Turkey–especially since European countries have laws forbidding not calling it genocide! Even the Turkish writer who was assassinated in Turkey for acknowledging Armenian genocide said he opposed European laws that forbid questioning it. He said that he would be the first to go test the law. He pointed out rightly that such laws make it harder to pressure on Turkey to allow freedom of speech on the issue. (more…)


Race and Medicine: A Reply from David Duke to a Quote by Dr. Esteban Burchard

Posted under: — @ 4:52 am
Email This Post Print This Post

race_book_cover.jpgRace & Medicine: A Reply from David Duke

Dear Dr. Esteban Burchard,

I read the following quote from you in an article about race and medicine titled “First Do No Harm” that appeared in Asian Weekly on March 9.

The sociologists are afraid that one group will use this sort of information to try to subjugate another group, Dr. Burchard explains. “That’s the fear. I mean, David Duke probably loves the kind of research we do because it seems to play right into his supremacist views.”

I realize that you know little about me other than what you have read in the press, but I am not a supremacist; I don’t believe any race should be supreme over another or control another. I never have stated that I think Whites are superior, for superior or inferior is a subjective idea. I think each race is best suited for the unique society it has created. I prefer to live in a society primarily of my own people and one reflective of my own heritage and values; and I believe that this sentiment, honestly admitted, is certainly true of the desires of most people on earth.

I think the societies created by the people in Europe and America are generally more compatible to the races that created them in the first place. This is because these societies were expressions of the genetic and cultural soul of the people who created them. This tautological truth can be said for Asian and African societies and their creators–indeed every people. (more…)


3/8/2007

What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks?

Posted under: — @ 1:58 am
Email This Post Print This Post

israel9111.jpgThe following quotes come from an article written by Christopher Ketcham that appeared on CounterPunch. To read the entire article you can follow the link at the bottom. Ketcham shares some of the latest evidence that the Israeli government knew about the 9/11 attacks in advance and treacherously let the horrendous attacks occur because it did not share the information with American government. More evidence is outlined to support my original contention in 2001 that Israel wanted the attack to occur and facilitated the terrorists either actively or passively. — David Duke

What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks?

Who Were the Israelis living Next to Mohammed Atta? What was in the Van on the New Jersey Shore? How did Two Hijackers Land on Watch List Weeks Before 9/11? Who Shut Down Fox News’ Carl Cameron?

On the afternoon of September 11, 2001, an FBI bulletin known as a BOLO - “be on lookout” - was issued with regard to three suspicious men who that morning were seen leaving the New Jersey waterfront minutes after the first plane hit World Trade Center 1. Law enforcement officers across the New York-New Jersey Area were warned in the radio dispatch to watch for a “vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack”:

White, 2000 Chevrolet van… with ‘Urban Moving Systems’ sign on back seen at liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center… Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion. FBI Newark Field Office requests that, if the van is located, hold for prints and detail individuals.

At 3:56 p.m., twenty-five minutes after the issuance of the FBI BOLO, officers with the East Rutherford Police Department stopped the commercial moving van through a trace on the plates. According to the police report, Officer Scott DeCarlo and Sgt. Dennis Rivelli approached the stopped van, demanding that the driver exit the vehicle. The driver, 23-year-old Sivan Kurzberg, refused and “was asked several more times[but] appeared to be fumbling with a black leather fanny pouch type of bag”. With guns drawn, the police then “physically removed” Kurzberg, while four other men - two more men had apparently joined the group since the morning - were also removed from the van, handcuffed, placed on the grass median and read their Miranda rights. They had not been told the reasons for their arrest. Yet, according to DeCarlo’s report, “this officer was told without question by the driver [Sivan Kurzberg], ‘We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.‘” Another of the five Israelis, again without prompting, told Officer DeCarlo - falsely - the “we were on the West Side Highway in New York City during the incident“. (more…)


3/7/2007

VIDEO: Kevin MacDonald on the History of U.S. Immigration Policy

Posted under: — @ 12:50 am
Email This Post Print This Post

Dr. Kevin MacDonald 2005Professor MacDonald Discusses the Illegal Immigration Crisis

Renowned group evolutionary psychologist and immigration researcher, Dr. Kevin MacDonald, discusses the history of U.S. immigration policy and the effect that Jewish organizations have had on influencing our immigration laws over the past hundred years.

Kevin also examines the negative impact that massive immigration is having on Euro-American group interests.

This sobering presentation was compiled from video clips originally featured on Byron Jost’s powerful 1 hr 41 min documentary, The Line In The Sand, and has been abbreviated down to a 30 minute segment for easier viewing and to highlight Kevin’s contribution.

 Kevin’s commentary is accompanied by video footage from other eminent anti-immigration activists and is interspersed with some crazy La Raza demo footage that is sure to motivate any viewer from the general public to quit worrying about sports scores, to put down the comic books, and go out and join Numbers USA and the Minuteman ProjectStaff
 

MacDonald Video on the Jewish Influence Behind Immigration 
(click F11 key to enlarge screen size)

Staff

The Fraud of Neoconservative “Anti-Communism

Posted under: — @ 12:46 am
Email This Post Print This Post

eastern_front_trotsky.jpg Left, Leon Trotsky, the Communist mass murderer revered by all the founders of Neoconservatism!

Only in an America, a nation where Jewish supremacy reigns in politics and media, could the worshipers of a Communist mass murderer, Leon Trotsky, come to control conservatism. The so-called Neoconservatives are not Neo-conservatives but Neo-Marxists whose founding leadership (such as Neo-conservative founding father, Leo Strauss) were all devotees of Jewish Bolshevism.  –David Duke

The Fraud of Neoconservative “Anti-Communism”
by Max Shpak

Neoconservatives and their apologists would have the public believe that the neocons were former Leftists who saw the light and came to reject liberal or Marxist ideology as a matter of conviction and principle. Regrettably, this official line has come to be conventional wisdom, no doubt reflecting neocon efforts to hide the fact that their transformation was neither sincerely motivated nor sincerely enacted. To understand the real agenda that drove and continues to drive much of neoconservatism, one needs to look back to the origins of the movement and the cultural backgrounds of those who lead it.

It is a well-established fact that many of the early luminaries of neoconservatism (most famously Irving Kristol in the 1940’s, a more recent famous example being David Horowitz) came from Marxist backgrounds, and that neoconservatism (like Marxism itself) began and continues to be a largely a phenomenon of Jewish intellectualism. In the early part of the 20th century, Marxism attracted a disproportionate pool of Jewish recruits for a number of obvious reasons. There are a number of complex psychological and social reasons for the attraction, all of which largely stem from the fact that Marxist internationalism is an ideology which by its very nature finds disciples among a rootless, anti-religious urban intelligentsia.

More important for the purposes of this analysis, however, are the practical reasons for Jewish sympathy with Bolshevism. European and American Jews alike carried deep-seated hatreds for the traditional regimes and religions of the European continent, particularly Czarist Russia and various Eastern European nations due to (real and imagined) “persecution” and “pogroms” that occurred there. Thus, when the Bolsheviks overthrew the Czar, destroyed the hated Orthodox Church, rendered powerless the landed religious peasantry, and replaced traditional Russian authority with a largely Jewish Commissariate, world Jewry (including alleged “capitalists” like the Schiffs and Rothschilds) embraced the Revolution and Marxist ideology alike. (more…)


« Previous PageFOR MORE ARTICLES »

0.629 || Powered by Duke site