Remembering Zundel’s Victory in the First Great Holocaust Trial

By Michael A. Hoffman II

January 7, 2005 marked the 20th anniversary of what came to be known throughout the world as “The Great Holocaust Trial” thanks chiefly to the drive, determination, courage and vision of one man, Ernst Zundel, supported by those he inspired.

In 1985 Zundel was a German immigrant residing in Toronto, Canada where he had built a highly successful advertising and graphic arts business based in a rambling Victorian mansion in the bohemian “Cabbagetown” section of metropolitan Toronto.

Zundel viewed the “Six million” story as a form of mental genocide against the German people; ostensibly a noble tale of the epoch struggle for human rights that in actuality was a form of devious hate propaganda, leveling every conceivable blood libel at the Germans and branding them with the Mark of Cain. Having survived the Allied firebombing of his native city of Pforzheim as a child, Zundel was well familiar with the war crimes of the hypocritical Allies and he made it his life’s work to clear the name of his own people.

For this commendable enterprise, Zundel had his mailing privileges revoked by the Canadian government in 1983, forcing him to open a post office box in Buffalo, New York and send a messenger to commute hundreds of miles just to receive mail. In 1985 he was charged under an archaic “False News” provision of an old Edwardian municipal code, for having published the pamphlet “Did Six Million Really Die?” He faced two years in prison if convicted.

In reponse Zundel put the so-called “Holocaust” itself on trial, hiring a little-known maverick lawyer from British Columbia, Douglas Christie, to argue his case before Judge Hugh Locke. Seated next to Christie was the learned revisionist historian Prof. Robert Faurisson of France, who guided Christie’s withering cross-examination of a long train of “saintly ‘Holocaust’ survivors” offered by the “Crown.” (more…)

Watch Dr. Norman Finkelstein blast apart the “Holocaust Industry”

Take a look at the appearance of Dr. Norman Finkelstein on a Canadian TV talkshow. When you finish watching the program you will learn why and how the Jewish extremist supporters of Israel have used the Holocaust story as a weapon to enable the crimes of the Zionists against the Palestinians and to extort billions of dollars for the Zionist cause. Both of Dr. Finkelstein’s Jewish parents were survivors of Nazi concentration camps during the Second World War, so it is particularly difficult to label him with the “anti-Semitic” canard. His scholarship and sincerity are very apparent in this interview as well as in his excellent books and papers on this controversial subject. Once you see this interview you will realize why Jewish supremacists are desperate to lock up, discredit, or silence Holocaust questioners around the world. Dr. Finkelstein says that once one becomes aware of the lies and outright fraud associated with the Holocaust Industry, it is surprising their aren’t more questioners.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eew4Z-KFPeA

On early Saturday morning the long awaited No More Wars For Israel Conference was successfully shut down by the traditional enemies of free speech, luckily thanks to the determination of the organizers of the event the conference did resume later in the day at a different location!

Organizer Mark Glenn reported that conference goers, many of whom had traveled to Southern California from halfway around the World, were shut out of the Irvine Marriott Hotel because of “the pressures brought to bear by Zionist extremist groups such as the ADL and others”.

Human Rights activist Hesham Tillawi reported that approximately fifty of the conference speakers and attendees decided to picket the sidewalks in front of the Marriott Hotel in order to protest the denial of Free Speech and Freedom of Assembly. The protesters shouted “No More Wars For Israel” and carried hastily built signs saying “Who Would Jesus Bomb?” and “Freedom of Assembly is Null and Void” as passers by gave them the thumbs up and honked their horns in support! (Click image to enlarge).

Legendary freedom activist Mike Rivero along with Hesham Tillawi broadcast this event live over their radio programs Saturday, super activists Chuck Carlson, Mike Piper, Rabbi Dov Weiss, Paul Fromm, Wendy Campbell, Dr. Frederick Toben, Eileen Fleming, Patrick Grimm and many more patriots were interviewed, you can hear the full audio report below. Also hear John DeNugent’s report about what happened behind the scenes courtesy of FreeTalkLive’s news team coverage — Staff:

LIVE Radio Coverage from the No More Wars For Israel Conference!

John DeNugent Reports From Behind The Scenes At The Conference!

Photos Courtesy: WRH.com

Introductory remarks by David Duke – Dr. Tom Sunic and I had an excellent meeting in Zagreb, Croatia not long ago. It was covered quite fairly in the biggest newsweekly magazine in Croatia called Globus. At that time Dr. Sunic went over with me the main topics of his lecture in Australia on Liberal Double-Talk. I thought it so valuable that with his permission and encouragement, the speech is now made available to the readers of www.Davidduke.com. It is vital that all of us around the world have a clear and fundamental understanding of the use of language and focus in directing our perceptions of the world. There is nothing more important than this understanding and the clearing of our mind of these programmed attachments. To that purpose I present here Dr. Sunic’s fine paper, and I urge our readers to go to Amazon.com and purchase his groundbreaking book, Homo Americanus which as he told me in our taped interview could well be called Homo Judaicus.

The Liberal Double-Talk and its Lexical and Legal Consequences

by Dr. Tomislav (Tom) Sunic

Language is a potent weapon for legitimizing any political system. In many instances the language in the liberal West is reminiscent of the communist language of the old Soviet Union, although liberal media and politicians use words and phrases that are less abrasive and less value loaded than words used by the old communist officials and their state-run media. In Western academe, media, and public places, a level of communication has been reached which avoids confrontational discourse and which resorts to words devoid of substantive meaning. Generally speaking, the liberal system shuns negative hyperbolas and skirts around heavy-headed qualifiers that the state-run media of the Soviet Union once used in fostering its brand of conformity and its version of political correctness. By contrast, the media in the liberal system, very much in line with its ideology of historical optimism and progress, are enamored with the overkill of morally uplifting adjectives and adverbs, often displaying words and expressions such as “free speech,” “human rights,” “tolerance,” and “diversity.” There is a wide spread assumption among modern citizens of the West that the concepts behind these flowery words must be taken as something self-evident.

There appears to be a contradiction. If free speech is something “self- evident” in liberal democracies, then the word “self-evidence” does not need to be repeated all the time; it can be uttered only once, or twice at the most. The very adjective “self-evident,” so frequent in the parlance of liberal politicians may in fact hide some uncertainties and even some self-doubt on the part of those who employ it. With constant hammering of these words and expressions, particularly words such as “human rights,” and “tolerance”, the liberal system may be hiding something; hiding, probably, the absence of genuine free speech. To illustrate this point more clearly it may be advisable for an average citizen living in the liberal system to look at the examples of the communist rhetoric which was once saturated with similar freedom-loving terms while, in reality, there was little of freedom and even less free-speech. (more…)

Comparing Sister Souljah to David Duke

A Bloomberg article of October 12 show once again the complete lack of professional honesty in the Jewish-dominated media. Of course, calling Bloomberg Jewish media is redundant. For the last 15 years I have read and heard literally hundreds of references to Clinton’s famous “Sister Souljah” where he “honestly” compared Souljah to me. Here is how Bloomberg referred to it in an article on Obama’s Sister Souljah tack:

Obama Takes `Sister Souljah’ Tack to Gain Ground on Clinton
By Heidi Przybyla and Julianna Goldman

Oct. 12 (Bloomberg) — One of the few contests so far where Democrat Barack Obama has bested Hillary Clinton is the Sister Souljah primary.

Telling an interest group what it doesn’t want to hear became known as a “Sister Souljah moment” after presidential candidate Bill Clinton criticized the hip-hop singer before a black audience in 1992. So far this year, Obama, 46, has talked up tougher emissions standards in Detroit, gone to the NASDAQ Stock Market in New York to chastise Wall Street executives over tax loopholes and their “what’s good for me is good enough” mentality and told black men in South Carolina that they need to “stop acting like boys” and face up to parental responsibilities….

Back in 1992, her spouse, then Arkansas governor, delivered his attack on Sister Souljah at a meeting of Reverend Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition. Bill Clinton likened the performer to white supremacist David Duke for asking whether violence in the black community might be reduced if blacks “have a week and kill white people?”

In the fifteen years since 1992 not one journalist who wrote about Clinton’s famous remark has dared to point out that the remark itself is fundamentally dishonest.

Sister Souljah suggested that Blacks “take a week off and kill White people.” Clinton compared those remarks by Sister Souljah to me and was praised by the press in doing so.

Problem is, I have never made a remark in my life supporting murder or violence against Black people or anyone else. (more…)

The Scramble for America

By Patrick J. Buchanan

What is it that distinguishes Bush Republicanism from the Coolidge, Taft, Eisenhower and Reagan varieties? Four major issues come to mind.

Bush is a “Big Government conservative” who repudiated the “government-is-the-problem” philosophy of Reagan. His No Child Left Behind program, doubling the size of the Department of Education, and his vast expansion of Medicare to cover prescription drugs so testify.

Second, Bush believes in Wilsonian interventionism, including the use of military force, to advance a “global democratic revolution” and “end tyranny on earth.”

Third, Bush believes in open borders, amnesty and “a path to citizenship” for 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens, and smoothing the way for untold millions more to come and “do the work Americans will not do.”

Fourth, Bush is a NAFTA-CAFTA man who believes in throwing America’s doors open to goods from all over the world, regardless of the protectionist practices of our trade partners. To Bush, free trade is an article of faith and faithful observance its own reward.

For seven years now, consistent with these beliefs, Bush has crafted national policy to conform to his convictions. Thus, any verdict on the Bush presidency must also render judgment upon his philosophy.

With his own and his party’s approval at the lowest levels since Watergate, one may conclude then that America is not only rejecting Bush the man and his record, but the philosophy behind both.

This should be a matter of grave concern to a Republican Party that has lately embraced all four pillars of the Bush-Republican philosophy.

For consider the fruits. (more…)

No More Wars For Israel Conference

Date: October 12-14
Location: Irvine Marriott, 18000 Von Karman Ave, Irvine CA — [Map]
Phone: 949.553.0100

Important Update–‘You-know-who’ is up to their old tricks that they inherited from their Pharisee forefathers of trying to silence any opposition to their agenda. As such, these individuals who would dare accuse the rest of us of being unpatriotic are trying to rob us of our rights to free speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press and freedom of worship. Elements within the Zionist extremist camp are already in panic mode over this upcoming conference and are calling around to all the hotels in Southern California pretending to be Police Officers and trying to find out where the conference is being held so that they can do their usual business of intimidating hotel owners and others into shutting us down. This is the reason why details of the conference have been kept private until this time. (See address above for location and phone number).

On the weekend of October 12-14 patriotic voices of conscience from around the world will be gathering in southern California to call for an end to the endless wars being waged… and yet more planned, if the neocons get their way…. in the Middle East by the U.S., sacrificing the lives of our sons and daughters all for the sake of a worthless parasitic and terrorist nation by the name of Israel that has been subjugating the Arab Christian and Muslim population of Palestine for nearly sixty years.

(more…)

The Anti-Fascism Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

By Curt Maynard

I’ll be darned if Sean Penn didn’t say something the other night on CNN’s Larry King Live that made a great deal of sense. As a rule Mr. Penn and I don’t see eye to eye on many things, but I couldn’t help but be pleasantly surprised to see Penn, the son of a Jewish father and Irish Catholic mother catch Larry King momentarily off guard when he quoted the old Kingfish Huey Long. Penn said, “Well, in 1932 Huey Long said something very interesting. It was, ‘Fascism will come to America, but likely under another name, perhaps anti-fascism.’” The look on King’s face was priceless, for a moment he was speechless, he finally managed a few words just before going to a commercial break, “We’ll dwell on that for a minute,” he said with a perplexed look on his face.

Of course King never returned to that particular comment, nope, something like that hits way too close to home. For the better part of fifty years Larry King [born Lawrence Harvey Zeiger] has done his absolute best to convince Americans that “anti-Fascism,” is the personification of the greatest American ideal, that as the polar opposite of fascism, it must always be good, whereas fascism is always bad, and should forever be equated with Hitler, the Nazi’s and of course the holocaust. And in one unguarded moment, this half-Jewish co-ethnic of King’s goes and gives the whole thing away, on national television, honestly noting that there isn’t a dimes worth of difference between two types of totalitarianism, even if the current perpetrator may have once been it’s victim. (more…)

Bratz Dolls

By Dr. Kevin MacDonald

Not having any young daughters I was quite unaware of the “wildly successful” Bratz dolls or the recent movie featuring them. (”A Good-Girl Make-Over for the Bratz,” Los Angeles Times, July 30, 2007). The dolls are aimed at 4-8-year-old girls, with “dewy lips, fishnet stockings and barely-there miniskirts — a creep-out factor for a lot of moms. Earlier this year, a report from the American Psychological Assn. even mentioned the Bratz dolls by name and said ‘it is worrisome when dolls designed specifically for 4- to 8-year-olds are associated with an objectified adult sexuality.’ ” So we have the cultural subversion theme going on: “ten-inch tall hoochie mamas” for little girls to play with. Director Sean McNamara’s first reaction to the dolls is revealing: “These aren’t cute dolls — they look like sluts.” (Here’s a collection from Google Images.)

But for the movie, they probably figured that the teenage girls as sluts theme would mean that the girls would actually have to act slutty rather than just look slutty. That would bring about an R-rating or worse, and therefore cut down on the profits. So the hoochie mama theme was downplayed in favor of a strong multicultural conflict between multi-race good guys versus “country club white” bad guys. The bad guys are led by “student-body president Meredith, who is platinum blond, affluent, haughty and in possession of both nefarious plans to rule the school and a pampered pooch named (ahem) Paris.” (more…)

Mexican claims to U.S. soil historically unfounded

By James Foxcurran

College campuses most often use the negative terms “imperialism” and “colonialism” to describe European and American history. Meanwhile, in 21st century North America, our southern neighbor is being granted moral legitimacy for the same behavior.

Mexican immigrants are now present in the Southwestern United States with a population percentage they have never enjoyed at any other time in history.

While defendants are saying it’s just the natural process of the Mexicans moving back onto land that really belongs to them and that the Hollywood demonstrations should be a source of conventional wisdom, history is being overlooked.

Mexico had barely colonized most of the Southwestern United States when it became U.S. territory in 1848. Spain, then Mexico, merely held imperial sway over Indian territories.

In 1835, Texas had about 3,500 Spanish-speaking residents, compared with almost 30,000 Anglo-American settlers, according to Ray Allen Billington, in his book The Far Western Frontier: 1830-1860.

In California, there were about 4,000 to 7,000 Spanish-speaking residents in the 1840s. The vast majority of the population was still Indian. Scattered missions, pueblos and presidios represented most of the Mexican presence in the area, which is why it was so easy for the United States to seize the area during the Mexican-American war, according to “History of French America” by Gilles Harvard and Cecile Vidal.

Meanwhile, in 1803, at the time of the Louisiana Purchase, there were 40,000 to 50,000 French-speaking residents west of the Mississippi River between Missouri and Washington state. (more…)

Losing the American Dream

By James Buchanan – EURO

A recent news article reports on a new phenomenon: “Toby Byrum decided to have a vasectomy to end his reproductive years. Unlike most of them, Byrum had his at the age of 28 while he is still single and childless. Two years later, the Web consultant from Jackson Hole, Wyoming, has no regrets… He’s not alone… (Doctors) around the country say that they are seeing a small but growing number of young men who are deciding to have vasectomies when they are young, all but insuring that they will never be able to have children of their own. ‘It’s kind of getting to be a departure from this society – a wife, a husband, have kids, live in the suburbs, – and instead is more, ‘Maybe we don’t want to have kids,’ ‘ Byrum said.”

One thing they don’t mention in the article is that the standard of living for the average White family keeps dropping and dropping and dropping. It used to be the case that a young White man in his 20s could buy a house in a nice neighborhood. Also, the husband could support the family with his salary and the wife had the luxury of being a full time mom if she wanted. Today many White people live in apartments even into their 30s and 40s, and many wind up raising families in apartments.

The skyrocketing cost of housing is due to the flood of Third World immigrants. The lack of job security is the result of a ruthless new “robber baron” capitalism in which corporate CEOs have zero loyalty to American workers and treasonous politicians allow jobs to be exported to the Third World by the millions.

The job market has never been less secure. You may spend four years in college only to find the jobs in your major have been outsourced. Some graduates from college have as much as $100,000 in debt just from their education.

(more…)

Montgomery Skunks in Alabama; A Den of Charlatans Remains

From the Files of Winston Smith

James Edwards Comments

The $outhern Poverty Law Center ($PLC) just can’t get enough of The Political Cesspool, and especially of our man James Edwards. The latest edition of that rancid organization’s main publication, the hilariously titled Intelligence Report, did a feature-length hit piece on James. And the report says far more about Morri$ Dee$ and Mark “The Pocket” Potok than it says about James. The piece also says much about the $PLC’s deluded supporters, as they seem to be content with seeing the same old tired buzz-words and worn-out demagogue phrases that the $PLC has deployed against us since March of 2006, when they did us the great service of adding our little radio show to their laughable “Hate Watch List.” Back then, $PLC she-reptile Heidi Beirich coronated The Political Cesspool “[t]he radio nexus of the hate movement,” a phrase the $PLC used again this year, saying, “[The Political Cesspool] has become the primary radio nexus of hate in America.” Over the past couple of years $PLC writers have treated their supporters to a dazzling display of descriptive desolation by falling back on canned phrases like “raging anti-Semite” twice, ““Who’s Who” of the radical right” at least four times (twice in the same issue of Intelligence Report), five references to Holocaust™ denial, six references to White supremacism, six references to David Duke, ten references to the Ku Klux Klan and Klansmen, eleven references to neo-Nazis, and several other examples of intellectual infertility. It also gives us a valuable clue as to the $PLC’s financial machinations. Follow me on this: Everything the $PLC says, writes, and does is for one purpose only – to get donations. The $PLC would never mention James if it didn’t result in an extra dollar in Morri$’s or Mark’s bank accounts. But the fact that James is featured prominently in $PLC publications for Winter, Summer, and Fall of 2007 means that he’s pure money for the $PLC, which in turn means that James and The Political Cesspool have long and bright futures. With all the money Morri$ and Mark apparently make off James, the last thing they would want is for him to go away and The Cesspool to go off the air. Heck, they’d probably hire a security company to make certain nothing happened to James. (more…)

Recycled Jews

NatAllNews

The focus lately has been on the Neo-Cons - the Lukudist Jews who claimed to be Republicans and conservatives, even though they had little in common with traditional Republican conservatism and were behind tricking the U.S. into attacking Iraq.

However, a Jewish intriguer from the previous Democratic administration has resurfaced – the one involved in the theft and destruction of files involving “terrorism.”

Whether a Democrat or Republican is President, the Jews have their claws in foreign policy and claim to be furthering U.S. policy in sensitive security positions while they are in fact sacrificing the U.S.’s interests for Israel and bringing terrorism on the U.S. because of it.

He’s back: Sandy Berger now advising Hillary Clinton

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Sandy Berger, who stole highly classified terrorism documents from the National Archives, destroyed them and lied to investigators, is now an adviser to presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. Berger, who was fired from John Kerry’s presidential campaign when the scandal broke in 2004, has assumed a similar role in Clinton’s campaign, even though his security clearance has been suspended until September 2008. This is raising eyebrows even among Clinton’s admirers. “It shows poor judgment and a lack of regard for Berger’s serious misdeeds,” said law professor Jonathan Adler of Case Western Reserve University, who nonetheless called Clinton “by far the most impressive candidate in the Democratic field.” (….Full Article)

The Lies of Globalism

By David Duke

Download mp3

Today, I speak about the genocidal effects of globalism as well as its inherent contradictions.

As all of us know, the world is getting smaller. Incredible advancements in transportation and communication make it so. Many national corporations that once had minor branches overseas have now become truly international, and their own loyalties have gone beyond their own national origins. Profit is their one flag, their one loyalty. It flies above nation, culture, race, morality, health, concerns over the environment, anything. These global concentrations of enormous wealth have become a juggernaut, amassing huge power and weight like a snowball turning into an avalanche. Interwoven with their enterprises, the globalists dominate the media, which, of course, has also become truly international. With it they control the democracies, where the sheeple cannot distinguish between a free press and a controlled one.

Many, in fact, labor under the impression we have a free press in America. Ha! That is the looniest notion imaginable here in the first fledgling years of the 21st century. Yes, we are free in America to publish a pamphlet or house newspaper, maybe even put a few controversial flyers out on the street; even though in many communities, if the pamphlet is politically incorrect you are liable to be hassled by the police and the local authorities. Many communities for instance have laws that you cannot leave literature at people’s doorsteps or put them on automobiles. Of course, you cannot distribute them at shopping centers, that are private property, and the United Colors of Benetton might get angry and have you arrested if you persist. (more…)

Ex-Mexican Prez: “Yes, There Will Be An Amero”

By Jerome R. Corsi

In an interview last night on CNN’s “Larry King Live,” the former president of Mexico, Vicente Fox, confirmed the existence of a government plan to create the amero as a new regional currency to replace the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar and the Mexican Peso.

It possibly was the first time a leader of Mexico, Canada or the U.S. openly confirmed a plan to create a regional currency. Fox explained the current regional trade agreement is intended to evolve into other previously hidden aspects of integration.

According to a transcript published by CNN, King, near the end of the broadcast, asked Fox a question e-mailed from a listener, a Ms. Gonzalez from Elizabeth, N.J.: “Mr. Fox, I would like to know how you feel about the possibility of having a Latin America united with one currency?”

Fox answered in the affirmative, admitting he and President Bush had agreed to pursue the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas – a free-trade zone extending throughout the Western Hemisphere – and that part of the plan was to institute a regional currency from Canada to the tip of South America.

“Long term, very long term,” he said. “What we proposed together, President Bush and myself, it’s ALCA, which is a trade union for all the Americas.”

ALCA is the acronym for the Area de Libre Comercio de las Américas, the name of the FTAA in Spanish (Free Trade Area of the Americas).

King, evidently startled by Fox’s revelation of the currency, asked pointedly, “It’s going to be like the euro dollar, you mean?”

For more