ADL the Jewish Extremist organization famous for sponsoring unconstitutional laws and spying on Americans has attacked Ron Paul over his wide spread support - John Young and Frank Roman fire back:
When you think of the images that are evoked by appellations like “White Supremacist,” “Nazi,” “Racist” or “Anti-Semite” - are any of those images compatible with the sorts of policies advocated by Ron Paul and favored by white activists? Absolutely not.
By John Young and Frank Roman
Well, the Anti-Defamation League has exhibited another acute attack of foot-in-mouth disease by attacking the extremely popular presidential candidate Ron Paul. Ron Paul’s supporters come from all walks of life. They are white, black, Asian, heterosexual, homosexual, Catholic, Protestant, Wiccan and Jewish. Probably no other candidate has shown such a broad appeal, or excited such intense commitment in his supporters. There’s a reason for this other than his good looks, of course, which we’ll explore in a minute. But the Anti-Defamation League, the self-selected determiners of which thoughts people are allowed to think, has selected ONE group of Ron Paul supporters as particularly troublesome: so-called “White Supremacists.” Specifically, the ADL’s assistant director of civil rights, Steven Freeman, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency his organization planned to communicate with Dr. Paul privately and urge him to distance himself from those groups. “If he doesn’t do that, then we will decide what we’re going to say publicly about it,” Freeman said. Because the ADL is so tangled in its own ridiculous rhetoric and lies, they don’t understand why so many pro-European-American activists have endorsed and supported Ron Paul’s candidacy. However, it’s vital to note that not everyone agrees 110% with each and every one of Dr. Paul’s election planks. That would be an impossible feat. The issue here is that, in the minds of a growing number of people, Ron Paul represents the best hope for America.
But that’s why we’re here: to help them, and our listeners, understand.
The first error in the ADL’s analysis is in their extremely broad definition of so-called “White Supremacism.” This isn’t really an honest error, but is rather derivative of their philosophical origins in Frankfurt School critical theory. It is an attempt to turn the basic instincts of fair play inherent in European Americans against themselves so they will destroy themselves in a fit of altruistic self punishment. When you think of a “White Supremacist” — what images come into your mind? A cloaked Klansman lynching a black man over an insult? Perhaps a Nazi laughing with fiendish glee as he throws Jewish children into gas chambers? Maybe a criminal mastermind holding the world for ransom? That is why the term is used, and used so liberally by the philosophical descendants of Karl Marx over at the ADL. The connotation is extremely negative, so negative in fact that any rational white person would willingly punish another white person who held those views. And really, a person’s chances of ever being accosted by an alleged ‘neo-Nazi’ or ‘white supremacist’ are about as good as hitting the lottery.


















RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
RDF