“Diversity Is Strength.” It’s Also…America’s End

By Pat Buchanan

On the Great Seal of the United States, first suggested by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, there was to be emblazoned a new motto: “E Pluribus Unum” – “Out of many, one.”

It was in their unity, not their diversity, that the strength of the colonies resided. So Patrick Henry believed, as he declared, “The distinctions between Virginians, Pennsylvanians, New Yorkers and New Englanders are no more. I am not a Virginian, but an American.”

National identity must supersede state identity for America to survive.

Yet it has lately become fashionable to say that America is great not because she is united, but because she is diverse. It is because America is a multicultural, multiracial, multiethnic, multilingual nation that she is a great nation. A corollary is that the more diverse America becomes, the better and greater she becomes.

After the Los Angeles riot of 1992, Vice President Dan Quayle was asked by his Japanese hosts if perhaps America did not suffer from too much diversity. “I begged to differ with my hosts,” Quayle retorted. “I explained that our diversity is our strength.”

And so our rulers, marinated in the myths that we “are a nation of immigrants” and “our diversity is our strength,” continue to embrace mass immigration – the more the better. But are the myths true?

America was settled by colonists from the British Isles. In 1789, two centuries after Jamestown and Plymouth Rock, we were 99 percent Protestant. Until the Irish came in 1845, there was almost no immigration. Even during the Great Wave of 1890-1920, the number of immigrants was a fraction of the 38 million here today. And all had come from Europe. By 1960, we were almost 90 percent European and more than 90 percent Christian – of one nationality, American, one language, English, and one culture.

Continue at Buchanan.org

ADL’s ’December Dilemma’ 

By Rev. Ted Pike 

The Anti-Defamation League says America has a big problem at Christmas-time - a “dilemma”.  Christianity is given much more prominence than other faiths.  Jews, some African-Americans, who celebrate Kwanzaa, and other religious minorities feel left out, as if their holiday observances are unequal to those of Christianity.

ADL is launching a massive “December Dilemma” campaign, educating public schools, government institutions, and town officials nation wide that such “bias” in favor of Christianity is not only unconstitutional but a grievous civil rights violation.In order to make members of all religions welcome during the holidays, ADL insists that “schools and governments . . . cannot favor one religion over another.” (See, Guidance Offered for the ‘December Dilemma’ from www.adl.org) Administrators should allow no more references to Jesus than to Mohammed or Confucius.  Ideally, no more Christmas trees should be displayed than stars of David or Buddhist shrines.  Only a sprinkling of Christmas carols can be allowed, interspersed with secular “x-mas” music. ADL says “…songs which ‘call on God for His blessing and contain an avowal of divine faith’ are not appropriate for public school students to sing.” Instead of celebrating Christ as Savior, ADL contends the Christmas season should be a time to celebrate all the world’s diverse paths to God.

(more…)

Day 7
of the 21 day Fundraiser for My Awakening

One reason why My Awakening is so essential is that it not only deals with the truth of the race issue, but it also speaks frankly about the role of Jewish extremism in the racial apocalypse facing our people. If you haven’t yet done so, please help us meet the December 17 fundraising deadline for the publication of the book’s new, updated edition!

THE NEW JEWISH QUESTION, OR THE “END OF GUILLAUME FAYE”
By Jürgen Graf

Comments by David Duke: The following is an excellent article by my friend, Jürgen Graf. It is  about another friend of mine, Guillaume Faye. The article is academically critical of Guillaume Faye, but since its subject is essential to our struggle for European American heritage and rights, I want to share it with you here.

First of all, I must say that I admire the fact that Faye has spoken and written extensively against the immigration invasion; on that he and I can agree. But after many conversations with him, I can attest that he is very aware of the preeminent role of organized Jewry in the destruction of European mankind. Thereofore, in writing a book that essentially says that we should now give aid and support to Jewish extremists, he has crossed the line. He has told me repeatedly of the suffering he has endured from the Jewish supremacists for defending Europe. Perhaps he believes now that he can somehow avoid their enmity by joining with them in condemnation of those of us who speak the the truth about the Jewish question. I find that despicable. Such indecent collaboration with the enemy not only hurts our cause, it will not find him any real redemption in the Jewish-extremist press–a press that relentlessly defends immigration and supports the death of European mankind.

I do not demand that every European American activist speak about the matters of Jewish extremism as I do. I don’t expect every scientist of racial truth or every political person of our persuasion to talk openly about the Jewish extremist influence on the West. Anyone who does not want to address that issue head on is free to leave it out of their scientific, academic or political work. A good example is Jared Taylor of National Renaissance. Although he does not take a position on the preeminent Jewish role in the anti-White efforts of media, politics and academia,  and although he has had Jewish speakers, even rabbis at his conferences, he does not promote the lie that there has been no Jewish role in egalitarianism, or that somehow we should now support the same Jewish power structure that is wiping our heritage off of the map. That is the right way to do it. Speak about what you want to focus on, but don’t condemn those who go further in telling the truth about the real forces behind the racial disaster facing us. (more…)

The Naked Emperor

By Dr. Kevin MacDonald

Several commentators have noted that the rise of Jewish intellectual and political influence was necessarily accompanied by a crisis of confidence in the older order. The culture of critique that resulted from this influence called into question the fundamental moral, political, and economic foundations of Western society. The pillars of the older Protestant intellectual and cultural establishment gave way to variety of complementary and overlapping utopian visions of America, including especially the vision of a multicultural America that has energized the pro-immigration movement from the beginning.

But because utopian visions sooner or later must clash with real-world realities, it was perhaps inevitable that this newer intellectual ethos would itself be subjected to the same scrutiny previously reserved for pre-1965 America and its 21^st-century remnants. The Achilles’ heel of the new establishment is Israel and the influence of its supporters in America, particularly the organized Jewish community. Some of the very same organizations, such as the ADL, that have been at the forefront of enforcing and extending the cultural revolution of the 1960s—the revolution that views the eclipse of white America as a moral imperative—have also been at the forefront of promoting Israel and defending it against criticism. But it’s becoming apparent to quite a few observers that the emperor has no clothes. (more…)

Embattled Zundel Seeks Supreme Court Hearing

From Paul Fromm

Washington, DC (11/28/07)–Embattled dissident Ernst Zundel, currently detained for speech crimes in a German prison, has asked the United States Supreme Court to address the judicial misconduct that led to his deportation from the United States and ultimately from Canada.

Zundel lawyer Bruce Leichty says he filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court on November 14, 2007, in which the Court has been confronted squarely with the denial by U.S. courts of Zundel’s constitutional right to have a habeas corpus court hearing.

“The Supreme Court has long recognized the right of all residents of the United States to be able to challenge acts of the sovereign leading to their detention or deportation, and to present evidence about the illegality of the acts,” says Leichty. “We have documented to the Court that Ernst Zundel did not get that right before or after his deportation, and that the Court of Appeals in Cincinnati shirked its duty to protect the constitutional right of Mr. Zundel.”

Zundel was deported from the United States without a hearing on February 19, 2003, after being taken into custody at his Tennessee home on February 5, 2003 on the pretext of a missed immigration appointment. That charge was later changed to overstaying the terms of his 2000 entry to the U.S., even though Zundel had married a U.S. citizen–ethnic Mennonite author and revisionist website operator Ingrid Rimland–and was awaiting routine processing for permanent residence. (more…)

My Awakening Republication Appeal!

This is Day 7 of the 21-day Fundraising Drive for the New Edition of My Awakening. I have finished the updates and additions for My Awakening and all the prep work is now complete for the 2008 Edition. Now, I must raise $25,344 by a December 17th deadline for the printers. When that goal is met the presses will start to roll and the book is promised for the first week of January, 2008. (more…)

READ SAMPLE CHAPTERS

Mike Huckabee - Traitor Times Two

By Winston Smith
Winston Comments

For those of you who are Christians, Southerners, and Christian Southerners, your choices for President of the United States should shrink by one.

Former Arkansas governor and potential presidential candidate Mike Huckabee’s positon on illegal immigration is enough to disqualify him from being President. But his position on abortion disqualifies him from being President and from being a Southerner.

“It’s the logic of the Civil War,” Huckabee said Sunday, comparing abortion rights to slavery. “If morality is the point here, and if it’s right or wrong, not just a political question, then you can’t have 50 different versions of what’s right and what’s wrong.”

It’s fair and safe to assume that Huckabee is ashamed of Arkansas’s past, seeing as he has essentially admitted that if he had been Arkansas’s governor during the days of Lincoln’s invasion of the South, Arkansas would have flown the Union flag and her sons would have worn Federal Blue - this from a guy who should know that you don’t become President unless the South votes for you. Those of us who have not sold our birthright to the hucksters of political correctness and cultural Marxism should be very concerned about the possibility of a Huckabee presidency. Because now, South-hating bigots all over the country know he would agree with them as they continue their efforts to bury the South under a mountain of lies and write our history to suit their bigoted agenda. On a past broadcast of The Political Cesspool, I told you about Rabbi Schmuley Boteach, a Zionist who says we Southerners are sinners because we honor our fathers and our mothers. If Boteach and his anti-Christian Zionist minions have the support of a President Huckabee, we will have to destroy all the monuments to our brave and honorable sires; we will have to teach our children that our gallant and noble forebears were among the worst people in history; we will live in a state of perpetual repentance for simply being the sons and daughters of courageous men and women who didn’t want the federal government deciding their morality – the exact opposite of what Mike Huckabee wants. Southerners should make an example of Mike Huckabee, and make a display of what we think of someone who would sell our past and our future for a pat on the head from rabid hacks of political correctness. Every Southern politician needs to know that we will not support any candidate who would represent us as being ashamed of our venerable mothers and fathers. (more…)

Buchanan: Israel is My Model

Jewish Telegraph Agency

Patrick Buchanan cited Israel as a model for his call to preserve the U.S. “identity.”

“Israel fights ferociously to preserve her religious and ethnic identity,” the three-time presidential candidate and commentator writes in his book released this month, “Day of Reckoning: How Hubris, Ideology, and Greed Are Tearing America Apart.”

“Immigration is restricted to those who are Jewish by birth or faith,” he writes. “While Jews from all over the world are urged to settle in Israel or on the West Bank, no Palestinian is permitted to return to the home of his father or grandfather. The rights of land ownership extended to Jews are not extended to non-Jews.

“Jewish history is taught in the schools. The Hebrew language has been revived. A Jewish currency, the shekel, has been created. There is talk of annexing all major Jewish settlements on the West Bank, and in exchange, giving up Israeli land contiguous to the West Bank where Arabs reside.

“Many Israelis say openly that while they wish to keep their Jewish population they would let the Arabs go. They seek an overwhelming Jewish majority in a Jewish state. Israelis understand it is not ideology that makes a nation. It is not democracy. Jews are a people. And Israel is unapologetic about preserving its ethnic and religious character.” (…Full Article)

 
Related:

Jewish Supremacism: The Jewish Led Alien Invasion