Praise For Lee And Jackson

January is often referred to as “Generals Month” as no less than four famous Confederate Generals claimed January as their birth month: James Longstreet (Jan. 8, 1821), Robert E. Lee (Jan. 19, 1807), Thomas Jonathan Jackson (Jan. 21, 1824), and George Pickett (Jan. 28, 1825). Two of these men, Lee and Jackson, are particularly noteworthy.

Without question, Robert E. Lee and “Stonewall” Jackson were two of the greatest military leaders of all time. Even more, the Lee and Jackson tandem is regarded by many military historians as having formed perhaps the greatest battlefield duo in the history of warfare. If Jackson had survived the battle of Chancellorsville, it is very possible that the South would have prevailed at Gettysburg and perhaps would even have won the War Between The States.

As those who are familiar with history know, General Grant and his wife held personal slaves before and during the War Between The States, and even Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation did not free them. They were not freed until the Thirteenth Amendment was passed after the conclusion of the war. Grant’s excuse for not freeing his slaves was that “good help is so hard to come by these days.”

In addition, both Jackson and Lee emphatically supported the abolition of slavery. In fact, Lee called slavery “a moral and political evil.” He also said “the best men in the South” opposed it and welcomed its demise. Jackson said he wished to see “the shackles struck from every slave.”

However, Lee knew that what Lincoln was about to do was both immoral and unconstitutional. As a man of honor and integrity, the only thing Lee could do was that which his father had done: fight for freedom and independence. And that is exactly what he did.

Instead of allowing a politically correct culture to sully the memory of Robert E. Lee and Thomas J. Jackson, all Americans should hold them in a place of highest honor and respect. Anything less is a disservice to history and a disgrace to the principles of truth and integrity…

[Exerpted from Praise For Lee And Jackson by Pastor Chuck Baldwin]

 
See moving tributes to Lee and Jackson below:

(more…)

“Technical difficulties caused by Zionist interference in our Civil Rights have caused disruptions in Zionist News videos. Evidently, only Zionists have Rights to communicate inside the American Zionist colony.”

A SPECIAL NOTE FROM FRANK WELTNER

After more than a month of hard work, I finally have good news that can finally be shared with you concerning our 160 video archive. This 25+ hour collection of informative videos in our Zionist News archive has been rescued intact and complete despite Zionist attempts to destroy them and our Freedom of Speech. Youtube seems to have cooperated totally with the Enemies of Freedom during this rude and anti-American scene of Zionist hatred and bigotry.

These people who censor persons not like themselves are extremely dangerous and anti-American. They and their subversive tribe own the NY Times, Washington Post, thousands of other newspapers, radio, and TV properties. They selfishly demand their Freedom of Speech be protected by all of us. However, their activities reflect that they are terrorists who are free to conspire inside our gates.

These terrorists of Zionist evil will defend a Zionist AIPAC supporter like Wolf Blitzer of CNN, yet, when it comes to non-Jewish reporters and journalists such as Frank Weltner and Jew Watch News, they are noticeably silent.

They are the selfish and quite bigoted goons of Zionist racial hatred which their newspapers and TV news studios express almost daily against the far vaster majority of non-Jews in this world.

Fortunately, they have lost this round of hatred.

We are presently restructuring and uploading our entire Zionist news collection… Evidently, our electronic and DVD backups proved more than adequate to insure our success.

We promise we will never be silenced by their Zionist hate whether in Tel Aviv, Washington, or New York. (more…)

The Boers -Made Fall Guys for International Capitalists

By Deirdre Fields
Deirdre Fields Interview, (or try here)

In September, ANC TODAY has published a disturbing article entitled “A fundamental revolutionary lesson: The enemy maneuvres but it remains the Enemy Part 1″ basically vilifies all whites as the enemy, intent on overthrowing the so-called “national democratic revolution” of the ANC.

While thus demonizing all Whites, and inexorably making ‘your skin-color your uniform’; the ingratitude expressed thereby, must surely ‘hurt the feelings’ of the vast majority of well-meaning White liberals who continue to support the ANC, disbelieving the evidence of their own eyes, trusting that this “nascent democracy” will mature into a real, western-type democracy.

Significantly, even the Democratic Alliance (DA) comes under suspicion: this successor of the Progressive Party through its many permutations under the leadership of Helen Suzman (right) or her successors, and the ongoing patronage of Harry Oppenheimer, was ever the apologist for the ANC, and greatly facilitated its ascendancy to power. In fact, Harry Oppenheimer himself, in 1994 boasted that he had been the “quiet engine that had powered the ANC”. (USA Today June 20, 1994).

Well, perhaps there are certain exceptions after all, for the ANC has meanwhile richly rewarded the Oppenheimer-Rothschild financial empire by granting it outrageous business favors, transferring the wealth of the old SA state, and the natural resources of the country into the grasping hands of this financial empire. In the process, a handful of the ANC leading lights have been transformed into Black oligarchs.

However, we see that the DA – and its rank and file supporters, now seems to be viewed as an entity apart from the Oppenheimer multinational-corporation and banker class, for whom it has presumably outlived its usefulness – and is indeed viewed with the same suspicion as that reserved for the Whites of the Nationalist Party. (more…)

Richard Warman Picks a Young Woman’s Pocket & It’s All Perfectly Legal

“Human Rights Commissions, as they are evolving, are an attack on our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a democratic society…It is in fact totalitarianism. I find this is very scary stuff.” Stephen Harper (Prime Minister of Canada)

By Paul Fromm

Freedom of speech took another hard hit today, as 21-year old sale clerk Jessica Beaumont was found guilty of a discriminatory practice under Sec. 13.1 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. This was yet another complaint by arch complainer and scourge of free speech on the Internet Richard Warman.

Miss Beaumont was slapped with:

• A lifetime “cease and desist order” forbidding her to post “ any matter of the type contained in the messages at issue in this case” that would expose privileged minorities to hatred or contempt. Should she express her views on-line and violate this draconian gag, she could face jail for contempt of court.

• A $3,500 fine to compensate complainant Richard Warman for having (probably erroneously) called him a Jew and some other nasty terms after he had turned her life upside down by filing this complaint. Hadjis ruled: “Section 54(1)(b) of the Act provides that where a victim is specifically identified in the communication that constituted the discriminatory practice, the Tribunal may order the payment of special compensation to the victim, of a sum that is not to exceed $20,000.” Amazingly, complainant Warman is seen as a “victim” because Miss Beaumont called him a Jew, even though he testified in another hearing that he is not. So, for his wounded feelings, Warman gets to collect $3,000 from a struggling young woman just starting out her working career.

• A $1,500 fine for having expressed her opinions on-line.

(more…)

VICTORY AT FEDERAL COURT!

From Marc Lemire

TORONTO . January 15, 2007. Despite an Eastern Ontario snowfall that delayed the appearance of his counsel, Barbara Kulaszka, for an hour and a half. Marc Lemire walked out of Federal Court in Toronto today a happy man. By sheer persistence, he had wrung out of the Canadian Human Rights Commissions some amazing admissions. At least one investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission has adopted a false Internet persona and trolled the Internet engaging in conversations with prospective victims. In other words, the CHRC is spying on Canadians, not observing and investigating, but participating and instigating.

After claiming Sec. 37, under the Canada Evidence Act to rule out a number of key questions to Canadian Human Rights Commission employees, the CHRC had effectively shut down some important lines of inquiry. When this claim to not divulge certain information is asserted by the government, the only recourse is to seek judicial review in Federal Court. The information is placed before a judge and he determines whether revealing the information would endanger national security or the life or safety of a person. It might be used to keep confidential the location of someone in the witness protection program. It is seldom used in civil court.

Marc Lemire contended all along that the Commission was hiding behind Sec. 37 to cover up their spying on Canadians. Following his oft repeated motto “No Surrender”, Mr. Lemire had persevered despite numerous Commission submissions and maneuvers made it clear he would go to Court, In a last minute effort to avoid Court, the Commission’s outside lawyer Margot Blight gave in on all points. Suddenly, what had once been information so sensitive it could not be revealed without imperiling the public interest was disclosed.

Among the information sought, protected but now revealed:

• CHRC senior investigator Dean Steacy admitted: “I created the Jadewarr email address on yahoo.ca and the Jadewarr account on Stormfront,” a prominent White Nationalist website.

Continue at Freedomsite.org

One person called me and suggested a small protest to Ron Paul’s MONEY BOMB DAY in honor of Martin Luther King.

On Martin Luther King’s Birthday celebrated on January 21, he says we should have a:

DAVID DUKE MONEY BOMB DAY

in support of the distribution of the newly updated, 2008 edition of My Awakening which will be officially published on the same day!

My editor at Davidduke.com prepared the following:

Statement of purpose:

Although many of us will vote for Ron Paul simply because he is the only candidate unequivocally opposed the the Iraq War and the destruction of American civil liberties, we must take the strongest exception to his recent praise of Martin Luther King on national television.

We cannot understand how a supposed libertarian and patriot could call King his hero. King referred to himself as a Marxist and had an open communist, Stanley Levinson, as his closest adviser and speech writer. King stood for bigger government, and an even more massive welfare state and he stood for onerous government coercion over the lives of the American people.

Martin Luther King stood against property rights, rights of association, state’s rights, local rights, and individual rights. Supposedly a man of the cloth, King was also a moral disgrace and hypocrite. He was guilty of clear plagiarism in his doctoral thesis in Divinity school, and who was even cited by civil rights leaders such Rev. Ralph Abernathy for his bisexual habits, repeated liaisons with prostitutes and his vicious beatings and other physical attacks against women. His FBI surveillance record was so disgusting and damning that it was sealed by the government for 50 years to hide his despicable character. (see www.martinlutherking.org)

(more…)

Amnesty Politicians Running for President

By Frosty Wooldridge

They spit and spat at each other. They condemn and degrade one another. They blame and accuse their competition. They sling mud while they stand neck deep in their own muck.

You may notice the media and presidential candidates on both sides drive the fourth most important issue in the polls–illegal immigration—into the “ignore-at-all-costs” section of the debates.

The main stream media led by Charles Gibson, Brian Williams and Katie Couric– bury any reports about illegal alien migration topics. From their powerful anchor chairs, why don’t they direct hard questions toward the candidates?

If you remember during final debates between Bush and Kerry, CBS correspondent Bob Schieffer said, “The most emails I’ve received for me to ask questions are illegal immigration….”

Bush and Kerry spent less than 90 seconds on the issue. Today, again, our national politicians and media avoid answering concrete questions on this nation’s most pressing crisis: 20 million illegal aliens imbedded and growing inside the USA.

Hard facts show Arizona’s Senator John McCain signed the 1986 amnesty for illegals, but did nothing to stop them for the next 20 years of his never-ending senate career. McCain, a former recipient of La Raza’s esteemed Capital Award, today runs on a full-out amnesty program with unlimited immigration. He voted for S. 1639 to double legal immigration, continue chain migration and maintain the annual jackpot “Diversity Immigration” of 50,000 from third world countries.

 
Continue at: News With Views

Holocaust revisionist’s lawyer jailed

From Press TV

A German court has sentenced the former lawyer of Ernst Zundel to three and a half years in prison for denying the Holocaust herself.

In addition to 3 1/2 years in prison, Sylvia Stolz has also been banned by the court from practicing law for five years.

During the trial of the Holocaust revisionist scholar, Ernst Zundel, Stolz called the Holocaust “the biggest lie in world history”.

Stolz has reportedly read a newspaper article to the court about the appearance of world renowned Israeli artist, Gilad Atzmon in Bochum.

In a public statement, Atzmon is quoted as having said that the written history of the Second World War and the Holocaust are a “complete forgery, initiated by Americans and Zionists”.

Stolz represented 67-year-old Zundel in his first trial in Germany and was banned from the court for allegedly trying to sabotage the proceedings. (…Full Article)

 
More headlines from occupied Europe:

Dr. Robert Faurisson faces trial for attending Iranian Free Speech conference

Austrian Wolfgang Frohlich earns 6.5 years for questioning Holocaust Industry

Making History: Marc Lemire’s Appeal to the Federal Court of Canada

From Paul Fromm
Paul Fromm Comments

For the first time ever in history, the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) is being challenged by Marc Lemire in the Federal Court of Canada for its spying operations, abuses of the law, deception and agent provocateur agenda.

Like some mobster in a U.S. trial who keeps invoking the Fifth Amendment, the CHRC is trying to keep the veil of secrecy wrapped tight around its spying operations on Canadian Internet dissidents. Its tool of choice is Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act. This allows government representatives the ability to prevent disclosure (hide) and claim immunity over the disclosure of information that the CHRC alleges to be injurious to Canadian Government security and operations of a Federal agency. The evidence Marc Lemire is challenging before the Federal Court is explosive and will blow the whole agenda of the CHRC into the open.

In a 300 page record, prepared by lead counsel Barbara Kulaszka, the abuse of Section 37 by the Commission was laid out in amazingly clear detail. Those 300 pages decimate the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s claims and expose the spying operations of Canada’s Thought Control apparatus

Come out and see the top freedom fighters in Canada battle the censors: Barbara Kulaszka, Douglas Christie, Paul Fromm and Marc Lemire

 
Federal Court of Canada
January 15, 2008 - 9:30am
180 Queen Street W
Toronto, Ontario

 
Case: T-860-07
Marc Lemire vs. Richard Warman, Canadian Human Rights Commission and Attorney General of Canada. Support Marc Lemire’s Constitutional Challenge (more…)

Hear David Duke Discuss What Ron Paul Must Do to Win! or Download

David Duke: What Ron Paul Must Do to Win

The first two Republican delegate contests are over and in spite of an unfair playing field created by the political and media establishment, Ron Paul’s vote has been very disappointing. After all, as he himself has pointed out, no one, no Republican or even Democrat candidate has raised more money in the last quarter. Even more tellingly, Ron Paul’s fund raising has been similar to my own major political races in that he had many more contributors than the other candidates, but like me, not as many big ones.  Yet, his campaign has not nearly generated the much higher percentage of votes I received in my major races. More contributors generally mean more grass roots support and an army of committed volunteers. Yet, all of Ron Paul’s support has resulted in far fewer votes for Congressman Paul than what one would expect.

Remember, that in Louisiana, outspent 50 to 1 in political advertising, and with a media establishment pulling out all stops to paint me as irredeemably evil, somewhere between public perceptions of Attila the Hun and Adolf Hitler, and after I  endured the most vicious media attack campaign in American history,  I still received over 60 percent of the White vote in elections for Louisiana’s two highest elected offices, Governor and Senator. Although it might surprise many reading this, even before I began my political rise in Louisiana, I actually won the New Hampshire primary for Vice-President of the United States with over 65 percent of the vote. Here is a direct quote the January 8, 2008 Toronto Globe and Mail on my successful electoral foray into the far northern state of New Hampshire:

Voters not registered with any party can choose to vote in either the Republican or Democratic primary, but not both.

VICE-PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY

New Hampshire is the only state that includes a choice for vice-president, though it has no bearing on anything… Usually, the winners are presidential hopefuls who get write-in votes as vice-president. Past winners include Dick Cheney, Al Gore, Colin Powell and David Duke.

Pat Buchanan with far less money than Ron Paul won the New Hampshire primary in 1996.

(more…)

One-third of SA’s 3-million Afrikaners are destitute, homeless, unemployable

Research by De Wet Potgieter

Sept 8 2007 Rapport newspaper writes: “South Africa’s 3-million Afrikaners — all multilingual people with a high standard Western education and a protestant work ethnic — are being forced back into the stone-age by the current ANC-regime’s laws which bars such ‘whites’ from the labour market.”

South Africa has about 4,5-m whites of whom 3-million are Afrikaners.

Rapport newspaper published an extensive survey this week of the current living conditions of the country’s Afrikaner community — and has found that they have now returned to identical destitution as they had been plunged into shortly after the Anglo-Boer war in 1902 right up to the Great Depression of the 1930s. During those years, the ‘poor white’ problem in South Africa was even highlighted by an international Red Cross report at that time - and international aid funding was made available to try and alleviate the destitution of poor Afrikaners in those years.

Now, the housing crisis for the country’s 1-million destitute, unemployable Afrikaners in fact has again taken on criticial proportions which are worse than their situation during the Great Depression, warns Dr Dawie Theron of the Helping Hand Fund - which is sponsored by Solidarity Trade Union’s membership. (more…)

Boer-Aid

Hello Africa Podcast

The Communist-ANC regime’s institutionalized racism against Whites in South Africa has devastated the Afrikaaner-Boer community, which now finds itself in the same state of destitution they were in during the period of shortly after the Anglo-Boer war in 1902 to the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Nearly one million of the three million Afrikaaner-Boer in South Africa, who are for the most part a highly-educated, multi-lingual workforce with Protestant work ethic, have now been left to beg in the streets and live out of tents in shanty towns, simply because the Communist-ANC has decided that their skin is too white to work.

Rising to the challenge of helping their fellow Boer are several charity groups, which cannot get funding from the Communist-ANC due to the fact that the aid is going to Whites. Included in this new set of humanitarian organizations is REDDINGS DAADBOND, or The Saving Action Group, run by the Boervolk. Max Lange of The Saving Action Group speaks about the plight of the Boervolk in the face of reverse-discrimination, and what is being done to correct this travesty.

Boeremag: Wilhelm Pretorius Update

Dr. Lets Pretorius speaks about the recent assault on his son, Wilhelm Pretorius, by prison wardens.

Wilhelm Pretorius has been held as one of the so-called “Boeremag” for the past five years without having been found guilty on any charges. The latest assault marks the latest in a string of incidents, which include abuse, neglect, and denial of rights by wardens against the accused as they sit waiting for their day in court. (more…)

Red Flags over New Hampshire

By Bev Harris

New Hampshire’s 2008 primary election may prove to be the most fascinating presidential preference race in history.

- Both Democrat and Republican candidates have requested recounts

- More than half of New Hampshire’s elections administrators hand count paper ballots in public at the polling place, with a public chain of custody. The rest of New Hampshire’s towns and cities use Diebold voting machines to count votes in secret, with a secret chain of custody.

- Hand count and machine count locations, when calculated statewide, show an eerie statistic:

Clinton Optical scan 91,717 52.95%
Obama Optical scan 81,495 47.05%

Clinton Hand-counted 20,889 47.05%
Obama Hand-counted 23,509 52.95%

- Two hand count towns reported “zero” votes for candidate Ron Paul to the media, even though they did have votes for him. The town of Sutton reported zero, but had 31 votes; the town of Greenville reported zero, but had 25 votes. The two towns had misreported results affecting exactly the same candidate in exactly the same way. (more…)

Ron Paul Needs to Respond to Vote Fraud

Ron Paul should hire people to do exit polls as a check on fraud.

By James Buchanan

Alex Jones Reports on this Scandal

First of all notice I didn’t say anything about vote fraud in Iowa. There weren’t any glaring signs of fraud there. The New Hampshire race however is screaming “vote fraud.” Hillary was trailing Obama by 13 percent according to a USA Today-Gallup poll, and we’re supposed to believe there was a 16 percent swing in favor of the Beast (Hillary) at the last minute. Why didn’t any of those people swing over to Edwards? Why would sane people want to vote for the least popular member of the Clinton crime family? Ron Paul was polling 15 percent in the polls before the election and after going through the Diebold voting machines this was whittled down to 8 percent.

It’s hard to get exact information because our masters don’t want us to know certain things. According to one Internet source 19 percent of the votes were counted by hand and 81 percent were counted by Diebold machines. One individual posted hand-count results, which gave Ron Paul 15 percent of the vote. That means that the Diebold machines were giving Ron Paul less than 8 percent to bring his average down to 8 percent.

An article on Prison Planet reports: “The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count. As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero. Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming ‘human error’ was responsible for the mistake.” (more…)

 
Message to Ron Paul: Defend Your Political Turf

By James Buchanan – EURO

The above table shows how New Hampshire voters rate Republican candidates on various issues in a recent poll. The most alarming fact is that Ron Paul is given a zero percent rating on immigration. This is a public relations disaster that needs to be addressed. Phony individuals like Huckabee, Romney and McCain pretending to be “tough on immigration” are the biggest problem.

The good news about Iowa and New Hampshire is that the winners of the primaries are candidates who claim that they want to “secure the borders.” The bad news is that they are liars. The one sincere top tier candidate, who would enforce immigration law, is Ron Paul. Unfortunately, the phonies have stolen the immigration issue from him.

The next obvious question is: What is being done about this? Surely Ron Paul isn’t going to sit around and let other candidates falsely claim that they want to “secure the borders” –stealing the most important issue of the election right out from under him. Unfortunately, that seems to be the case. Ron Paul apparently doesn’t want to criticize a fellow Republican even if it means losing the primary.

Tom Tancredo was the best-known candidate for enforcing immigration law. He got 14 percent of the vote in the Iowa straw poll in August. Following the Iowa straw poll, the political chameleons Romney, Huckabee, Giuliani and even McCain jumped on the anti-illegal immigrant bandwagon. Tancredo’s percentage dropped from 14 percent to 1 percent and never climbed back up. They stole Tancredo’s main issue from him and they put him out of business. (more…)