OBAMA’S RACE SPEECH: INSULTING OUR INTELLIGENCE

By Devvy

Perhaps all of Devvy’s analysis is not spot-on or palatable to white preservationists, but what she does well is lay to waste the racial fraud and illusion animating the Obama campaign. -Staff

“Obama’s victory was more than a progressive move; it was a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle. Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface. This is the old revolutionary “mole,” not only showing his traces on the surface but also breaking through.” The People’s Weekly World, an on-line communist propaganda rag

On March 18, 2008, Barack Obama gave what dullards in the dominant media have dubbed as his “race” speech in response to the fire storm over his long time association with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. This speech was damage control, a carefully crafted oration full of all the right words and phrases in an effort to stop Caucasian voters from running away from his campaign.

Obama’s speech on race is being called “brilliant.” Some gas bags on cable networks are comparing Obama to Abraham Lincoln. Really? Abraham Lincoln was an open racist, a white supremacist who hated the Negro race and cared nothing about freeing slaves. As a matter of fact, he wanted to ship anyone with black skin out of this country. What, you say? How can that be? I was taught in school that Honest Abe Lincoln (the mascot for the Republican Party) is a hero who bravely took on the south to free the slaves!

There are two books everyone should read and should be required reading in all schools throughout this country. I know time is an issue for everyone, but I promise you, these two books are well worth the time invested. The first is Lincoln Unmasked: What You’re Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe by Thomas DiLorenzo. The second is Forced into Glory: Abraham Lincoln’s White Dream by Lerone Bennett, Jr. The hero image of Abraham Lincoln is as tarnished and fake as the one hanging on John McCain.

With a great amount of pushing by his handlers, Obama has now gone to great lengths to distance himself from the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, basically saying he didn’t know Wright is a racist and hates America. Despite the clever word smithing of his race speech, this simply does not sell as truth. How can you attend a church for 20 years and not be exposed to the agenda hawked by Rev. Wright? Obama has been sold as an “African-American,” yet his church under Wright clearly and without apology states their complete allegiance is to the continent of Africa. Fine, Rev. Wright. Pack your bags, go to Africa, pick any country you like, and spew your hatred of Caucasians and America from your beloved land. I’m sick of hyphenated Americans. Either we’re all together as Americans or divided we will fall. Obama and others have tried to prop up Rev. Wright with how much his church has done for AIDS victims, outreach and other good deeds. Sorry, Obama, it doesn’t wash. All of these altruistic undertakings can be done without hating America, other races or religions, i.e., Wright’s admiration for a bigot like Louis Farrakhan.

(more…)

Pictured: Sir Oswald Mosley arguing against unrestricted immigration on the front page of Pi, University College London newspaper, Feb 2, 1961: Click for full-scale image

Migration has brought ‘zero’ economic benefit to Britain

By Philip Johnston and Robert Winnett

TEN years of record immigration to Britain has produced virtually no economic benefits for the country, a parliamentary inquiry has found. A House of Lords committee, which is due to report next Tuesday, will call into question Government claims that foreign workers add £6 billion each year to the wealth of the nation.

It is expected to say this must be balanced against the increase in population and their use of local services such as health and education, resulting in little benefit per head of the population.

“OUR overall conclusion is that the economic benefits of net immigration to the resident population are small and close to zero in the long run,” the report will say.

The findings of the Lords economics committee threaten to demolish the key argument made by ministers to justify the highest levels of immigration in the country’s history.

The inquiry by the committee, which includes two former chancellors and several former Cabinet ministers, is the first to try to balance the costs and benefits of large-scale immigration.

The population is increasing by more than 190,000 every year, largely as a result of immigration.

Foreign workers now make up 12.5 per cent of the labour force, compared with 7.4 per cent a decade ago. Critics say Labour lost control of the borders, issued too many work permits and should not have opened up the labour market to eastern Europe.

(more…)

.

Eve Carson Murdered in Part by Affirmative Action

See: Probation Officer Never Met With Lovette (on WTVD Raleigh Durham)

Eve Carson, the gifted and beautiful Student Body President of UNC, was murdered by two Black males with long criminal records. In a startling turn of events, it turns out that an affirmative action, Black probation officer, Chalita Thomas, was derelict in her supervision of the criminal, Laurence Lovette, one of the Black men who was charged with Miss Carson’s murder. Apparently, she never even met with Lovette and it is alleged that she made embellishments on his probation record.

To top it all off, it has been revealed that probation officer Chalita Thomas herself has a serious criminal record with 11 arrests over the last five years!

So, here we have a case in which one of the Blacks charged in the Eve Carson Murder was facilitated by an affirmative action, Black criminal probation officer who didn’t do her job! Whites with higher test scores and clean records are routinely turned down for law enforcement positions in favor of lower scoring Blacks, often even one’s with criminal records.

In a practical sense, Eve Carson was murdered by three Blacks. Two of them were the denizens who shot her to death, and one of them was the criminal probation officer who didn’t do her job.

In the major cities there are also increasing numbers of Black judges and Black juries eager to set free vicious Black criminals.

The racial disintegration of American civilization is reaching new lows.

How many more outrages must European Americans endure? (more…)

Black Churches

By Lewis Doherty

Are the Blacks involved in the disproportionate number of crimes against Whites doing “God’s work”?

Are Black churches encouraging and rationalizing anti-White activities?

Where are all of the stories and documentaries on the major networks and cable channels about the “Afrocentric” Churches as are run on White interest groups?

The media refers to White groups as “hate” groups and Black groups as Afro centric.

Will their be a big “Stop the Hate” program pointing out how Blacks have benefited from their association with Whites?

While Obama made a thing about distancing himself from Reverend Wright’s statements, has he been asked to distance himself from the church in which the congregants yelled approval at Wright’s statements?

Has the government sent in agents to monitor these churches and agent provocateurs into these churches to cause incidents, generate bad publicity and disrupt their operations?

Another Reverend and church:

Pastor Defends Hate-Filled Obama Sermons This is a rush transcript from Hannity & Colmes, March 27, 2008. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

ALAN COLMES, CO-HOST: Reverend Jeremiah Wright triggered controversy with his comments from the pulpit and now another fiery pastor is caught on tape causing trouble for Barack Obama. This time, Harlem Minister James David Manning whose youtube broadcast captures him delivering some hate-filled sermons against the Illinois senator.

(Fox News transcript)

The Utter Normality Of Ethnonationalism—Except For Whites

By Dr. Kevin MacDonald

Jerry Z. Muller’s Foreign Affairs article, Us and Them: The Enduring Power of Ethnic Nationalism (March/April, 2008), is a grim and timely reminder of the power of ethnicity in human affairs. It has explosive implications for the future of the United States and the West.

Muller demonstrates that, over the last 150 years or so, the general trend in Europe and elsewhere has been toward the creation of ethnically-based states—“ethnostates”. This trend did not end with the close of World War II. In Europe, the war was followed by a forced resettlement of peoples—mainly Germans—to create ethnically homogeneous states. Indeed, the high point of ethnic homogenization in Europe was in the two generations in the immediate aftermath of World War II.

Muller writes:

“As a result of this massive process of ethnic unmixing, the ethnonationalist ideal was largely realized: for the most part, each nation in Europe had its own state, and each state was made up almost exclusively of a single ethnic nationality. During the Cold War, the few exceptions to this rule included Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union, and Yugoslavia. But these countries’ subsequent fate only demonstrated the ongoing vitality of ethnonationalism.”

This point is crucial. While the recent spreading of the European Union imperium has given rise to a great deal of “post-nation” rhetoric, it has in fact been accompanied by an astonishing multiplication of ethnostates, split out of Yugoslavia and the former USSR — not to mention, of course, the Czech/Slovak division

Ethnic conflict is apparent as well throughout the developing world, and will likely lead to more partitioning and nation-creation. As Muller notes: “In areas where that separation has not yet occurred, politics is apt to remain ugly”.

But a huge anomaly has arisen. Recently, Western societies have embarked on a public policy project in which the ethno nationalism of white people is officially proscribed as an unadulterated evil. Multiculturalism only is encouraged and viewed as morally superior. As Muller notes: “Americans … find ethnonationalism discomfiting both intellectually and morally”.

As a social scientist who takes the biological component of ethnicity seriously (although I readily agree that there is a cultural component as well), I can speak from personal experience about the hostility and moral disdain one faces from other academic social scientists when one points to these unfashionable facts…

 
Continue at VDARE.com

May Day Elections

The Jews have done such a good job in creating ethnic tranquility in places like Israel they are going to help out in Britain.

Maybe their slogan to attack the BNP, “Your Voice or Theirs” would be good to turn around and use for projects addressing the domination of Jews in the British media.

The Politically Correct also tend to label those who they don’t like as “extremists.” But those who are able to assemble the votes to be elected are not extremists since extremism is defined by having one’s views held by only a small percentage of the population:

New Bid to Target BNP Vote on May 1st

By Leon Symons and Dana Gloger

The Jewish Chronicle today gives its backing to a community-wide campaign to prevent the British National Party from winning seats in the May 1 local and London elections.

In London, there are particular fears that the BNP could achieve the five per cent threshold needed to give it its first seat in the London Assembly. It is believed the BNP will contest seats in 23 councils in all.

A number of communal groups are working together to diminish the BNP’s chances. The Board of Deputies of British Jews and the London Jewish Forum are campaigning under the slogan “Your Voice or Theirs” [see link]. The Board’s activities will concentrate on getting as many members of the Jewish community as possible out to vote…

 
Continue at NatAllNews.com

Rabbi: Hang Arab children from trees

A Zionist cleric has urged the Israeli regime to give the green light to the massacre of Arabs in retaliation for Palestinian attacks.

In an article published in the newsletter Eretz Yisrael Shelanu Shmuel Eliyahu, the chief rabbi of Safed, has urged the Israeli regime to officially allow “revenge against Arabs to restore Israel’s deterrence.”

“I’m not talking about individual people in particular, I’m talking about the state. [Israel] has to pain them to the point where they scream ‘Enough,’ to the point where they fall flat on their face and scream ‘help.’ Not for the sake of satisfying the need for revenge but for the purposes of deterrence,” he wrote.

In the newsletter Eliyahu proposes “hanging the children” of those who attacked the Mercaz Harav yeshiva from a tree.

The rabbi added: “We’ll stay here. We need to live with those who understand very well the language of revenge.”

On Wednesday, Mossawa Center, an Arab human rights group, called for a probe into Eliyahu’s remarks.

SB/RE

CHRC Operatives Hack Unsecured Wireless Access Point to Post Hate Messages!

Innocent woman targeted due to CHRC dirty tricks

By Marc Lemire

March 25, 2008 has been the single worst day the Canadian Human Rights Commission has ever suffered in it’s 25 year history of thought control. The hearing is over the Constitutional Challenge filed by Marc Lemire of the notorious Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

After 10 months of litigation due to absurd claims of “national security” by a panic stricken CHRC, and a blizzard of legal motions, Marc Lemire won the right for a subpoena of the records of Bell Canada to reveal the subscriber information of “Jadewarr” an account used on the White Nationalist Stormfront.org website that attempted to entrap Marc Lemire. A few months ago it was revealved that the “Jadewarr” account was used by numerous CHRC employees, but primarily by a Senior Investigator named Dean Steacy.

The last activity of “Jadewarr” on Stormfront was: Dec 8, 2006 at 3:29pm.

The IP address used by “Jadewarr” was: 70.48.181.203.

Alain Monfette, director of the law enforcement support team for Bell Canada, was the first witness called by Marc Lemire pursuant to a subpoena. With him was the answer to a mystery and the opening of a new one.

The Bell Canada subscriber using IP address 70.48.181.203 on Dec 8, 2006 (connected for the entire day) was: Nelly Hechme of ******* Avenue in Ottawa.

It was a mystery wrapped in an enigma…

During later testimony by Dean Steacy, he testified to having no knowledge of who Nelly Hechme was or how that person got access to the “Jadewarr” account on Stormfront. Just what on earth was going on. The IP address and everything matched. What is going on here?

Until, the National Post’s Joe Brean called Nelly Hechme and asked what she knew about this. The poor Nelly was shocked. I am sure it’s a pretty odd day when the National Post calls and asks if you’re a government agent posting racist messages on the Stormfront website, especially when you have no idea what Stormfront even is. (…Full Article)

 
Paul Fromm Comments on CHRC Scandal

Two of the thousands of Palestinian children murdered by Zionism. 

What Christians Don’t Know About Israel
by Grace Halsell 

Comments by David Duke — In this article, a very liberal, but also very honest writer lays bare the Jewish extremist media and political power that supports multiculturalism for America but Jewish supremacism for Israel. Author Grace Halsell speaks about how the Jewish masters of media loved her books on behalf of American Indians, American Blacks, and illegal aliens, but as soon as she spoke about the brutal torture of thousands of Palestinians her books and articles were condemned and suppressed by the same Jewish media barons. This article is very instructive about the plight of the Palestinians and the misleading of American Christians, but it is also very revealing of the double game that extremist Jews are playing in America. Do the Jewish masters of the media really think increasing racial diversity is a good thing for the United States? They sure don’t believe in it for their own people or for the Jewish state that they support. In fact, these powerfully positioned extremists in America’s elite see American diversity as part of a divide and conquer strategy that will increase their own power and influence as a cohesive Jewish community. In other words, the egalitarianism they support for America is simply a means by which they advance their own ethnic supremacy in media and politics. As they advance their own supremacist agenda, both the true interests of the American people and that of the Palestinians are sacrificed. It is vital that Christians understand that Israel is no real  friend of America or of Christian principles. This article is a real eye-opener for those who have not lost the ability to think for themselves. — David Duke

American Jews sympathetic to Israel dominate key positions in all areas of our government where decisions are made regarding the Middle East. This being the case, is there any hope of ever changing U.S. policy? American Presidents as well as most members of Congress support Israel - and they know why. U.S. Jews sympathetic to Israel donate lavishly to their campaign coffers. .

The answer to achieving an even-handed Middle East policy might lie elsewhere—among those who support Israel but don’t really know why. This group is the vast majority of Americans. They are well-meaning, fair-minded Christians who feel bonded to Israel - and Zionism - often from atavistic feelings, in some cases dating from childhood.
(more…)

Koreatown Video

A Glimpse at the Future of America

In this horrific news clip you will see the America of the future resulting from the Racial Transformation of Uncontrolled Immigration –

As you watch this video, you will think it was filmed in some Third World country. Looting, shooting in the streets, and anarchy. A crying, elderly White woman on her way to buy groceries watches the mayhem and asks how this can be happening. It is not the White America she grew up in, for parts of it have now been transformed to the point where she walks as a frightened stranger in what was once peaceful and productive White neighborhoods. And it is not just Koreatown or Watts or Harlem anymore, today the cancer is invading every city, even small towns like Siler City, North Carolina. This video should be a shocking wake up call to all European Americans.  How can any White person viewing this not realize that the time to stand up is now. If we don’t stand up now, all will be  lost in our country and every one of our children will walk as this frightened grandmother, as a stranger in our own land, the land our forefathers built.   –David Duke

Photo: Marc Lemire walks to the Canadian Human Rights Commission in Ottawa

Jeers and loathing at rights tribunal

By Joseph Brean, National Post

OTTAWA — Investigators at the Canadian Human Rights Commission share control of an online identity called Jadewarr, which they have used to anonymously monitor and contribute to controversial far-right and white supremacist Web sites, in a strategy that a prominent defendant calls entrapment.

The admission came in testimony Tuesday at the final day of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s hearing in the case of Marc Lemire, who is charged with violating the Human Rights Act’s controversial hate speech section because of comments posted on his FreedomSite.

Legally, the admission by CHRC investigator Dean Steacy, and the subsequent cross-examination by Mr. Lemire’s lawyers, was the most significant part of the day, in that it bolstered Mr. Lemire’s case that he should not be held accountable for what others post on his site, especially if those others are government employees.

But as a microcosm of Canada’s beleagured human rights bureacracy, there was much more to take note of, and no shortage of dark humour. (…Canadian Media Article)

Lid Blown Off Commission Internet Spying in Lemire Case

Marc Lemire’s Liveblog Entries
Paul Fromm & Marc Lemire Comment

OTTAWA, March 25, 2008. In explosive testimony today before a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal investigating a complaint by perpetual Canadian Human Rights Internet complaint filer Richard Warman, CHRC investigator Dean Steacy admitted to a wide ranging spy operation conducted by himself against dissident websites. His Internet snooping involved setting up multiple accounts and false identities on such websites as Stormfront and the Freedomsite:

March 25 - Morning Session. BELL CANADA

OTTAWA, March 25, 2008.

“The first witness I’ll be calling is Mr. Alain Monfette of Bell Canada,” victim Marc Lemire’s lawyer Barbara Kulaszka led off this morning’s hearing. She asked Mr. Monfette, the Director of Law Enforcement co-ordination for Bell’s security. He had been asked for the registration information of IP 70.48.181.203 (more…)

JEWISH WRITERS CLAIM POWERFUL ZIONISTS DROVE USA INTO MID-EAST WAR FOR SAKE OF ISRAEL!

When Congressman James Moran (D-VA) told an audience that leaders of American Jewish groups were pushing America into a war with Iraq, he was denounced as an “anti-Semite” and pressured to resign.

When Syndicated columnist and former Presidential candidate Pat Buchanan accused Jewish neo-conservatives and the US-Israeli lobby of pushing America into a war against Israel’s enemies, he was also widely denounced as an “anti-Semite.”

But what are we to make of the many outspoken Jewish writers, Jewish intellectuals and Jewish activists who have been warning us about the exact same thing? Should we dismiss these Jews as “anti-Semites” or “self-hating Jews”? Following are some very revealing quotes from just a few of these Jewish writers and journalists.

============================================================

Joe Klein, Time Magazine, Time.com, February 5, 2003

“A stronger Israel is very much embedded in the rationale for war with Iraq. It is a part of the argument that dare not speak its name, a fantasy quietly cherished by the neo-conservative faction in the Bush Administration and by many leaders of the American Jewish community.

The fantasy involves a domino theory. The destruction of Saddam’s Iraq will not only remove an enemy of long-standing but will also change the basic power equation in the region. It will send a message to Syria and Iran about the perils of support for Islamic terrorists. It will send a message to the Palestinians too: Democratize and make peace on Israeli terms, or forget about a state of your own.”

Michael Kinsley, Slate Magazine, October 24, 2002

Tariq Aziz has a theory. Saddam Hussein’s deputy told the New York Times this week, “The reason for this warmongering policy toward Iraq is oil and Israel.” Although no one wishes to agree with Tariq Aziz, he has put succinctly what many people in Washington apparently believe.

The lack of public discussion about the role of Israel in the thinking of “President Bush” is easier to understand, but weird nevertheless. It is the proverbial elephant in the room: Everybody sees it, no one mentions it. The reason is obvious and admirable: Neither supporters nor opponents of a war against Iraq wish to evoke the classic anti-Semitic image of the king’s Jewish advisers whispering poison into his ear and betraying the country to foreign interests.

Ari Shavit, Haaretz News Service (Israel), April 5, 2003

“The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.

In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in the town (Washington): the belief in war against Iraq. That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history.” (more…)

Israel: Founded On Terror

By Rev. Ted Pike

Zionist-dominated mainstream media vividly portrays Israel as a tiny embattled nation seeking peace in a sea of Arab hostility. ¹ Arabs, we are told, commit acts of terror while Israel only resorts to violence out of self-protection. The facts of history paint a very different picture.

Far from deploring terror, Israel has sanctioned terror to seize and expand its territory since its beginnings. In 1944, Zionist leaders in Israel faced two alternatives. They could continue to allow the British and Arabs to occupy Palestine , who would continue to pressure Israel to concede a Palestinian state. Or they could drive both British and Arabs out. Israelis chose the latter.

Members of the Zionist ruling elite and their clandestine terrorist enforcers–the Jewish Agency, Hagana, Irgun and the Stern Gang–began to exert every possible terrorist means to dominate Palestine . Their strategy was simple: the more respectable Zionist establishment would take the “high road” and officially disavow terrorism. Meanwhile, Zionist terrorists would commit any crime needed to disrupt British occupation and to panic Arabs into flight. The Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem, available in most university libraries, documents from British records more than five hundred violent or terrorist incidents against Palestinians and the British occupation between 1939 and 1948. These included bombings, booby traps and landmines, kidnappings and torture of prisoners, bank robberies, murders of Arabs, and assassinations of police and British officials. ²

Chief terrorists were David Ben-Gurion, Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir and later, Ariel Sharon. Begin headed Irgun, and Shamir led the Stern Gang. They cooperated intimately with the highest political body of the Zionist establishment, the Jewish Agency, and the popular Zionist resistance army, Hagana. Ben-Gurion headed Hagana and later the Jewish Agency. ³

After 1944–when Ben-Gurion formally rejected the British plan for partition of Palestine into Jewish/Arab states–most Israelis, particularly the young, favored expulsion of British and Arabs.

Here is the short list of Zionist atrocities from 1944 to the present:

• Assassination of Lord Moyne on November 6, 1944 . Under orders from Yitzhak Shamir, terrorists of the Stern Gang shot Lord Moyne, British resident minister. Purpose: To drive the British from Palestine .

• The King David massacre, July 22, 1946 . Begin’s Irgun terrorists, with encouragement from Ben-Gurion’s Hagana, blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem , murdering 92. Purpose: Destroy British records that proved the highest members of the Zionist government backed anti-British terrorism. ⁴

• British sergeants hanged, July 12, 1947 . Begin, Shamir, and Haganah authorized kidnapping and hanging of two British sergeants, booby trapping their bodies and mining the area. During this time, Shamir sent many letters and package bombs to British officials. 1947 also included multiple cases of kidnappings (including brutal floggings of British soldiers) by Jewish terrorists.

• The Semiramis Hotel massacre, January 5, 1948 . Jewish Agency leader David Ben-Gurion and Haganah leaders blew up the Seramis Hotel in Jerusalem , killing 20 and wounding 17. Purpose: Terrorize Arabs into fleeing Israel . ⁵

• Deir Yassin massacre, April 9, 1948 . Begin’s Irgun soldiers killed 250 sleeping Arab villagers at Deir Yassin, a suburb of Jerusalem . “25 pregnant women were bayoneted in their abdomens while still alive. 52 children were maimed under the eyes of their mothers and then were slain and their heads cut off.” ⁶ “…Menachem Begin, the leader of the Irgun gang, himself admitted on December 28, 1950 in a press interview in New York, that the Deir Yassin incident had been carried out in accordance with an agreement between the Irgun and the Jewish Agency and Haganah.” ⁷ Begin was always proud of what he had done, considering Deir Yassin a legitimate military target. Irgun trucks drove throughout Judea , announcing by loudspeaker to hundreds of thousands of Arabs that unless they fled Israel they would meet the same fate. Deir Yassin and subsequent terrorist acts precipitated flight of more than 800,000 Arabs from Palestine . In town after town Zionist soldiers drove Palestinians out, usually killing any person who delayed or attempted to take any possessions with them. Arab towns were bulldozed, replaced with Jewish communities. ⁸ Begin comments on the level of Palestinian terror generated by Irgun’s massacre at Deir Yassin. “Out of evil, however, good came. This Arab propaganda spread a legend of terror amongst Arabs and Arab troops, who were seized with panic at the mention of Irgun soldiers. The legend was worth a dozen battalions to the forces of Israel .” ⁹ Israel exiled these unfortunates to concentration camps in Lebanon , the West Bank , and Gaza , refusing to allow them repossession of their land and property or adequate compensation. ¹⁰ This is the seminal cause of international Arab terrorism and the Mid-East conflict that rages today.

(more…)

Obama Campaign has the New Black Panther Party on his Website

Obama is an intelligent politician and knows exactly what he must say to win the White votes he needs to be President, so his campaign has been rife with the comments that every American politician makes about how we need a “color blind” society and how we must come together across racial lines.  But, what are Obama’s real sentiments?

In a recent speech Obama condemned the rhetoric of his long time mentor and the pastor of his church, the Rev. Wright. Obama’s church is an openly anti-White church dedicated to Africa and Black people above all else. The first paragraph of its stated purpose is to remain “true to Africa.” Not America, Africa. (For more details read my article on www.davidduke.com –Why I oppose Obama for President of the United States. —  just scroll down a few pages)

Obama has been present hundreds of times with Rev. Wright in public and private as he has spoken hatred against White people as well as hatred against America. Obama has known for years what Rev. Wright has proudly preached and taught, and he obviously had no problem with Wright’s anti-White and anti-American hatred.  No problem, that is, until Wright’s sermons were posted by White patriots on the Internet for all the world to see.

Now that Obama has a real chance to be President and needs White support he claims to condemn Rev. Wright’s statements. In fact, Obama’s official Website even welcomes the support of a racist, communist Black organization such as the Black Panthers, an organization with a long history of violence against White Americans. Above is a screen shot of Obama’s official Website recognizing and welcoming the support of the “New Black Panther Party.” From their inception, Black Panthers preached a violent overthrow of the “White Government of the United States.” (more…)

Typical White Fact-Based Reasoning

By Randall Hoven

Senator Barack Obama said in his memoir, The Audacity of Hope, “The arguments of liberals are more often grounded in reason and fact.” Yet he also claimed that to fear a black person on the street more than a white person is a racial “stereotype”, “bred” into us.

It is true that Jesse Jackson confessed to the same fear. More importantly, that fear is a rational one, borne out by “reason and fact”. The data are available.

The U.S. Justice Department provides a breakdown of homicides by the race of both the victim and offender. Looking at the data for 2005 (the latest year available), we find that whites committed 48.0% of all murders and blacks committed 51.2% of all murders.

However, whites outnumber blacks in the population. In fact, non-Hispanic whites are about 69% of the population and blacks are about 13% .

These statistics alone, that blacks are 13% of the population but commit 51.2% of the murders, indicate that blacks commit a seriously disproportionate number of murders.

What we would like to find specifically is the likelihood that a given person is a murderer.

The table is based on a total population of 10 million for illustration purposes only; the total population does not matter for relative frequencies or computing likelihoods.

But now look only at columns of that table. Of 6,899,895 whites, for example, 240 of them are murderers. That is a rate of 3.5 per 100,000. (Without knowing a person’s race, that rate was 5 per 100,000, which is borne out in the rightmost column of the table.) Now look at the column for Blacks. The rate there is 19.7 per 100,000.

That is, the chance of just any person you see on the street murdering someone this year is about 5 of 100,000 (assuming you see a random sample of people). The same chance of a white person is 3.5 of 100,000. And the same chance for a black person is 19.7 of 100,000. That means a black person is 5.6 times more likely than a white person to be a murderer.

It is totally rational for a any person (including Jesse Jackson and Barack Obama’s grandmother) to fear a black person more than a white one. In fact, you should fear them 5.6 times more.

Original Article