U.S. Government, Talmud, Mock New Testament

By Rev. Ted Pike
Ted Pike Interview

The U.S. State Dept.’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism now says the New Testament is a book of conspiracy theory! Yes, our government now rules that the Biblical record that Jews had Christ crucified is not only anti-Semitic; it’s conspiracy junk. This step toward criminalization of Christian beliefs directly threatens believers. It is also an act of blatant hypocrisy: While the New Testament is derided as “hate speech,” not a word is said about the seething hatred contained in Judaism’s most sacred book, the Talmud.

The State Department reports, “The tactics of many anti-Semitic groups include the propagation of conspiracy theories… Traditional conspiracy theories…” include the belief   “…that the Jews are responsible for the death of Christ.” ¹ For tens of millions, the New Testament is anything but conspiracy theory! It’s the written Word of God.

But now our State Department says the New Testament account of Christ’s passion, culminating in rejection by the Jewish people and crucifixion by the Romans, is akin to the other conspiracy theories that inspired Hitler to attempt to destroy Jews. My previous article, “Bible is Hate, Says U.S. Government,” documents the State Department’s other charge: that the New Testament espouses “classic anti-Semitism.”  ²

Hitler is rightly considered a classic anti-Semite. But the State Department, in also labelling the New Testament “classic anti-Semitism,” suggests it is morally and intellectually similar to Nazism. This implies the New Testament could lead to yet another Holocaust! This premise, legislated into “anti-hate” laws, will justify persecution of Bible-believers as “anti-Semites.”  After all, it will be reasoned, people with hateful ideologies, leading to violence against Jews should be restricted, even imprisoned. (more…)

Child Molesting Scandal in Judaism

Jewish media will never give their tribe the same criticism as the Catholic Church

By Ian Mosley – EURO

How, exactly, has it come about that certain Jews are immune from the law?

A recent news article reports that former rabbi Edward Schlaeger was found with two compact discs loaded with child pornography. Child porn laws are one of the few remaining morality laws that are enforced in this country. Can you imagine any Gentile getting found with two CDs of kiddie porn and not going to prison? Does anyone seriously think that if this character were a Christian minister or a Catholic priest (especially the latter) he wouldn’t have been crucified in the media on prime time?

And whatever happened to that rabbi who was successfully entrapped by “To Catch A Predator” on television, coming into a house expecting to have sex with a child? That case seems to have dropped right out off the radar.

A Google search of “rabbi child molester” finds no shortage of articles. One website reports “Convicted sex offender Yechiel Brauner is back on the streets again after his latest arrest. Brauner who is currently on probation for fondling a 15 year-old boy in a hearst on the way to his grandmother’s levaya is now again in trouble for allgedly falsifying documents, conspiring to rob a dying old woman of her home and for failing to report that he was a sex offender when he applied for his notary public. Brauner was released on $85,000 bail…”

Another article reports “The most ‘far-flung and exotic fugitive investigation ever conducted by the U.S. Marshals Service’ ended early Sunday with convicted child molester Alan Horowitz in custody on U.S. soil. Alan Horowitz was convicted in 1991 on 34 counts of child molestation. Officers from the U.S. Marshals service arrested the 60-year-old at Newark Liberty International Airport after a 15-hour flight from New Delhi, India. The ordained Orthodox rabbi and former child psychologist was arrested on May 22 at a seaside resort… He is being held at a correctional facility in New Jersey and will appear before an extradition judge on July 16th before being taken to New York to face a parole violation charge there. He also faces a federal charge of unlawful flight to avoid prosecution.” (more…)

Judaizing The US Church

By Harmony Grant

The Jewish Forward’s recent “most read” article worries that evangelicals might be stealing from the Jews. But it is Christians who should really be worried.

The article describes a Passover banquet in Alabama where 1,300 Christians gathered for unleavened bread and bitter herbs and donated more than $10,000 to the Jewish Federation. A local rabbi complains, “It is a total taking over and arrogation to themselves of the entire concept of the Seder. It’s totally Christological.”

Evangelical Christians’ support of Israel is essential to the Jewish state. The powerful Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations even publicly supports Rev. John Hagee—Israel-firster extraordinaire; they recently wrote the NY Times to defend him as Israel’s “true friend”. Binyamin Netanyahu—Israel’s ninth prime minister, an extremist who resigned as finance minister in 2005 to protest withdrawal from Gaza—said Christian Zionists are Israel’s best friends in the world! In a recent poll, a whopping 82 percent of evangelicals agreed that Christians are morally obligated to support the Jewish state. In his New Testament letters, the apostle Paul repelled attempts by Jews to impose on the early church the rites and legalisms of Old Testament law. He furiously rebuked the apostle Peter for bending to Judaizing influences; he said Peter “stood condemned.” (Gal. 2:11) As evangelicals today fall even deeper into this unbiblical love affair, they are increasingly eager to participate in Jewish rites, own Jewish trinkets, and learn about Jewish culture.

Who is really damaged by this Christian appropriation? Jews are not becoming more Christian. Christians are becoming more Jewish! Jews are not donating money for Christian evangelism (or even allowing it in their country)! It is Christians who finance a religion dedicated to opposing their own. And their gift of millions of dollars to Israel is flatly contrary to Scripture. Christians are instructed to give their tithes and offerings to the “household of faith,” i.e., many Christian charities and relief organizations that help further the gospel message. (Gal. 6:10) Judaism and the state of Israel are emphatically not of the household of faith. Israel ‘s “anti-missionary law” mandates a five-year prison sentence for any evangelical who gives to an Israeli a “material inducement” (Bible tract or even a cup of coffee) that might help persuade him to become a Christian! (more…)

“Call your Senators and Representatives toll-free at 1-877-851-6437. Tell them: “Please revoke funding for the State Department’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism. It does not represent scholarly research but the anti-Christian biases of the Anti-Defamation League.”

Bible Is Hate, Says U.S. Government

By Rev. Ted Pike
Ted Pike Comments

In its recent report to Congress, the U.S. State Department “Office of Global Anti-Semitism” makes a startling policy statement. It says the New Testament record that the Jews had Christ crucified is “classical anti-Semitism” — a historic form of hate. ¹
 
In its 2005 report to Congress, the State Department included as an “anti-Semitic incident” the case of a Polish priest who said Jews killed Christ. Today, three years later, the State Department could not be clearer. 

Are you one of tens of millions of Christians who agree with Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ that evil Jewish leaders incited a Jewish mob and persuaded Pilate to have Christ crucified? The U.S. government now considers you “anti-Semitic.” You are part of a worldwide scourge the U.S. government, Canada , Australia , and 55 European nations are uniting to suppress. ²
 
In the many countries now ruled by hate laws, it is already a federal offense to repeat the claim of New Testament “hate literature” that the Jews had Christ crucified. ³ The State Department’s equation of Biblical Christianity with “hate” is an ominous indication. The Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith – architect of hate laws worldwide (and primary ideological and statistics-gathering force behind the Office of Global Anti-Semitism) — is moving rapidly to create bias against Christians as haters, particularly of Jews and homosexuals. (more…)

Zionist watchdog Philip Weiss provides us with an interesting case study. Here we have Sheldon Adelson (left), a Las Vegas casino tycoon who openly supports Jewish racial causes to the tune of $200,000,000.00 dollars annually, including the funding of an exclusive Jewish High School here in the USA, yet Adelson receives no public outcry of racism or calls for boycotting his businesses. At the same time we have European-American billionaires who are too intimidated to donate one red penny to organizations such as EURO which will respectfully stand up to represent their European-American heritage and interests. One must ask what kind of powerful conditioning is at work here. — admin

‘Washington Post’ Whitewashes an Extremist

By Philip Weiss

When I was a kid, we didn’t drink Welch’s Grape Juice, didn’t eat Welch’s grape jelly. Any Welch product. That’s because Robert Welch was one of the founders of the John Birch Society, which my family saw as anti-semitic. Probably was for all I know. But that’s why we couldn’t have Welch’s. And I approve. I wonder how my mom knew that. Maybe from the liberal press, such as it was.

Well today George Will writes a whole column about Sheldon Adelson in the Washington Post, third richest man in America, and it is entirely about his business activities. Not a word about his political activity: the biggest backer of birthright, the turn-them-into-Zionists-and-get-them-to-marry-Jews free trips to Israel; a big backer of the Israeli right; and most important, a giant backer of Freedom’s Watch, the pro-Iraq-war group started after meetings at the Republican Jewish Coalition.

One of the great failures of American journalism has been its failure to out extremists, including Jews who are undermining the peace process, which I thought was U.S. policy. Adelson is said by Haaretz to be close to Netanyahu. I believe his thinktank in Israel is headed by Sharansky. Shouldn’t the Washington Post be reporting on this? Forty years ago my family got the news. Today there is none. (…Full Article)

 
Related:

Sheldon Adelson pledges annual $200 million to Jewish, Israeli causes

Left: Morris (“Seligman”) Dees co-founder of the SPLC
Right: Best selling author Professor Kevin MacDonald

Campaign Against Me by the SPLC

By Dr. Kevin MacDonald

[Commentary by David Duke -- In this latest rebuttal to the SPLC attack on him, Dr. Kevin MacDonald responds with the incontrovertible facts of the preeminent Jewish role in changing American and European immigration laws. If MacDonald is simply documenting what other Jewish scholars have hinted at, why should he be persecuted. Is the truth anti-Semitic? Should MacDonald be persecuted for simply telling it? This rebuttal has more than enough documentation to prove that all Prof. MacDonald has done is to document the historical and contemporary role of Jews in the transformation of America to a non-White nation. He also proves by their own writings that their role in the destruction of the American White majority is connected with their own supremacist agenda. --David Duke]

The Southern Poverty Law Center has been conducting a campaign against me since September, 2006. As part of this campaign, academic departments at CSULB are being pressured into releasing negative comments on my work. The History Department has complied with this pressure and has released a statement on my work: CSULB History Department Statement of April 4, 2008

 
Reply to CSULB History Department Statement:
Jewish Involvement in Influencing U.S. Immigration Policy

The History Department has released a statement condemning my work. In particular, the Department states: “He argues that the 1965 U.S. Immigration Law was “the ultimate triumph of the Jewish policy on immigration” without ever examining the legislative history of the bill or the actual Congressional debates over it.”

If one looks at the text and notes to this chapter, it is quite obvious that I read the Congressional debates over U.S. immigration law beginning in the 1920’s right up to 1965. In view of this, I demand that the History Department issue a retraction. I present a list of footnotes and text references referring to these debates below. (more…)

The Courts, the Constitution and the Clown in the Castle

By Viva Malta

When I first heard the news of Norman Lowell’s guilty verdict, together with a prison term of two years, suspended for four years, I was shocked and totally speechless. How can this be? Malta has freedom of speech guaranteed by its constitution, the accusation is simply a scare tactic. We appear to be living in those times again. We seem to be reliving the 1960’s.

Norman Lowell was charged on several counts of ‘inciting racial hatred’, and also with a charge that wouldn’t be out of place in the Soviet Union, or any tin pot dictatorship for that matter, of ‘insulting the president’. Norman’s comment that President Fenech Adami was ‘a good gardener’ but a lousy president’ seems to have insulted a man who takes it upon himself to insult the people given the opportunity. This is an ‘honourable’ president who has pardoned drug traffickers whilst in office.

Now back to the more serious issue of freedom of expression. This should in all modern societies that don’t stone women to death for blasphemy be sacred. Indeed, Malta’s founding fathers placed a provision in our constitution that guarantees that we be allowed to express our opinions in a free manner. I quote the said article below:

English version: http://www.legal-malta.com/law/constitution-4.htm

41. (1) Except with his own consent or by way of parental discipline, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, including freedom to hold opinions without interference, freedom to receive ideas and information without interference, freedom to communicate ideas and information without interference (whether the communication be to the public generally or to any person or class of persons) and freedom from interference with his correspondence.

In view of the above, how on earth can Norman Lowell or anyone in Malta for that matter be censored? Sure, there are all those of the opinion that ‘inciting hatred is different’ but what about all those opinion writers in the newspapers? Doesn’t Daphne Caruana Galizia of Independent fame spew hatred in almost every article she writes? Doesn’t Andrew Borg Cardona of the Times do likewise? Do they have the right to express their thoughts as they please? If they say something libelous, then the offended person knows to pursue them through legal channels. What about our MLP and PN politicians? One of the MLP gang said PN voters had faulty DNA. Isn’t that hatred? A chap from the other camp said that Labourites are like animals – you cut off their tails and they remain the same. (more…)

Political prisoner Ernst Zundel is currently working on his SIXTH year behind bars simply for expressing opinions that the Zionists don’t like. Unbelievably his defense lawyer, Sylvia Stolz, was also sentenced to three and a half years simply for defending Ernst too vigorously. This long lost interview conducted by Pastor Peter J. Peters tells of but a small part of Ernst Zundel’s heroic battle to set the historical record straight and to restore freedom of speech and inquiry to Candians, Europeans and to the World. For all the latest updates on Ernst’s grievous situation please visit the ZundelSite.org — admin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-Pt_r39y04

——————–
2 of 5 (more…)

“Despite the United State’s instrumental role in facilitating the ANC takeover in South Africa, the American government has not been as gracious in opening our doors to White South Africans who suffer robbery, rape, and murder, in part, because of American policy towards the White regime in South Africa. When White South Africans petition for asylum or seek to immigrate legally, the Immigration and Naturalization Service filled with large numbers of Black affirmative action employees thwart their attempts at every corner.” — NorthlandTrekker

‘US returned us to hijack hell’

By Lauren Thys, Beeld

Delmas – “We want the Americans to know to what kind of a country they sent us back to.”

Wentzel Herbst said: “I’ve had to go through another hijacking and, this time, my children were with me.”

Herbst had been in the car with his brother-in-law, Jimmy Watson, when Watson was killed during a hijacking just more than a week ago.

Wentzel, his wife, Carol, and their children, Deiran, six, and Tegan, three – who were born in the United States – were visiting the Watsons in Delmas.

Three years ago, the family was refused asylum in the US, after being there for six years and had to return to South Africa.

They had applied for asylum in the US because of the crime situation in South Africa.

Just before they left for the US, Wentzel had been shot in the back during a hijacking.

Wentzel and the children went to buy food for the family who had gathered in Delmas after they had heard that Watson’s daughter, Sharon Knoetze, had died in a car accident seven hours earlier.

Carol said: “My children are traumatised. They got such a fright when they saw the violence of the hijacking and when their father yanked them out of the car so quickly.

Wentzel said: “When we said we feared for our safety in South Africa, the Americans thought we were joking and said that South Africa was a perfectly safe country to go back to.” (more…)

In Memory of Charlton Heston:

Fighting the Cultural War in America
by Charlton Heston

A few years ago I was astounded to read these courageous remarks by Charlton Heston. I am thankful to hear a man with such high esteem say essentially the same things for which I have been reviled by the liberal media. His words should be reproduced and put into the hands of every American. — David Duke

Actor Charlton Heston, born October 4, 1924, was one of some performing artists who received the Kennedy Center honors on December 6, 1997. Mr. Heston remained in Washington D.C. and addressed the 20th Anniversary of the Free Congress Foundation and the 4th Birthday of the NET TV network. The following are excerpts from his Insightful remarks. Mr. Heston and Mrs. Heston celebrated 50 years of marriage in 1994.

A cultural war is raging across our land-storming our values, assaulting our freedoms, killing our self-confidence in who we are and what we believe. (Mr. Heston then asked those present who owned a gun to raise their hand.)

I wonder how many of you own guns but chose not to raise your hand? How many of you considered revealing your conviction about a constitutional right, but then though better of it?

If so, you are a victim of the culture war being waged against traditional American freedom of beliefs and ideas. You have been assaulted and robbed of the courage of your convictions. Your pride in who you are and what you believe in has been ridiculed, ransacked, and plundered! It may be a war without a bullet or bloodshed, but with just as much liberty lost: You and your country are less free!

Because you choose to own guns- affirmed by no less than the Bill of Rights- you embrace a view at odds with the cultural war lords. If that is the outcome of cultural war, and you are the victims, I can only ask the obvious question. What will become of the right itself? Or other rights not deemed acceptable by the thought police? What other truth in your heart will you disavow with your hand? (more…)

Should the U.S. End Aid to Israel?

Funding Our Decline

By Alison Weir

April 1st I participated in a debate in San Francisco that raised the question of US aid to Israel.

It was highly appropriate that this debate was held two weeks before tax day, since in Israel’s sixty years of existence, it has received more US tax money than any other nation on earth.

During periods of recession, when Americans are thrown out of work, homes are repossessed, school budgets cut and businesses fail, Congress continues to give Israel massive amounts of our tax money; currently, about 7 million dollars per day.

On top of this, Egypt and Jordan receive large sums of money (per capita about 1/20th of what Israel receives) to buy their cooperation with Israel; and Palestinians also receive our tax money (about 1/23rd of that to Israel), to repair infrastructure that Israeli forces have destroyed, to fund humanitarian projects required due to the destruction wrought by Israel’s military, and to convince Palestinian officials to take actions beneficial to Israel. These sums should also be included in expenditures on behalf of Israel.

When all are added together, it turns out that for many years over half of all US tax money abroad has been expended to benefit a country the size of New Jersey.

It is certainly time to begin debating this disbursement of our hard-earned money. It is quite possible that we have better uses for it.

To decide whether the US should continue military aid to any nation, it is essential to examine the nature and history of the recipient nation, how it has used our military aid in the past, whether these uses are in accord with our values, and whether they benefit the American taxpayers who are putting up the money.

1. What is the history and nature of Israel?

Describing Israel is always difficult. One can either stay within the mainstream paradigm, or tell the truth. I will opt for the truth.

Drawing on scores of books by diverse authors, the facts are quite clear: Israel was created through one of the most massive, ruthless, and persistent ethnic cleansing operations of modern history. In 1947-49 about three-quarters of a million Muslims and Christians, who had originally made up 95 percent of the population living in the area that Zionists wanted for a Jewish state, were brutally forced off their ancestral land. There were 33 massacres, over 500 villages were completely destroyed, and an effort was made to erase all vestiges of Palestinian history and culture. (…Full Article)

 
Related:

The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: $3 Trillion (2003 estimate)

2008 National Faith & Freedom Conference MP3!

Thanks to the tireless efforts of the Stormfront Radio Team and the dedicated work of Pastor Thomas Robb & company, Dr. David Duke was able to deliver a last second surprise address from Europe by telephone to old friends and patriots gathered at the National Faith and Freedom Conference on Saturday evening in Harrison, AR. Although we were not able to record all of the excellent speakers at the event, in addition to David’s heartfelt address, we did manage to record the better part of an incredible speech by White Rights spokeswoman extraordinaire Rachel Pendergraft (see www.whitepride.tv). For good measure we also recorded heroic Free Speech activist Paul Fromm‘s powerful keynote address Guilt No More along with a couple of inspiring songs from the angelic singing duo Heritage Connection (see www.heritageconnection.tv for free MP3s). Be sure to catch more great speeches scheduled for Sunday only on Stormfront Radio! — admin

New info on–

The Vogue cover: a Jewish expression of anti-White hatred

New Information: After I posted this article, a reader pointed out to me some important new information on the origin of this disgusting cover of Vogue. The photo of Gisele Bündchen and Lebron James was done by the Jewish supremacist (for a time she even went to live on an Israeli Kibbutz) and long-time White hater, Annie Liebowitz! Liebowitz was the lesbian lover of fellow Jewish supremacist, the late Susan Sontag (real name Susan Rosenblatt). Sontag was the most well-known, undisguised hater of White people in the world. 

Sontag wrote that “Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Balanchine ballets, et al. don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history.” (Partisan Review, Winter 1967, p. 57.)

Sontag, a proud descendant of a long line of Jewish extremists, had no problem referring to the White race as the cancer of history because Jewish radicals like her don’t see themselves as White, but as a distinct people superior to all of humanity. For these Jewish supremacists, there are only two kinds of humanity, the Jewish “Chosen,” and all the rest of the world’s people who are collectively defined as Gentiles or “Goys.”

The depth of her abject hatred of European mankind and civilization can also be seen in her “apology” for the remark. Sontag didn’t apologize for saying her “cancer” remark was hateful and vicious against White people, she apologized for it being insensitive to cancer victims! In perhaps a cosmic apportionment of justice, Sontag herself became cancerous in a literal sense and died in 2004.

Wikipedia says the Vogue cover’s photographer, Annie Liebowitz, has a style “marked by a close collaboration between the photographer and the subject,” so it’s probable to assume she directed James & Bundchen’s poses as an “in your face” affront to White males and a clear lesson for White women (who are not lesbians as she is) to let themselves be taken by Black men.  As the article shows, this vicious anti-White photograph on the cover of the world’s leading fashion magazine, one owned and controlled completely by Jewish supremacists, is part of hateful pattern against White people seen throughout the Jewish-dominated news and entertainment media. — Dr. David Duke

Vogue magazine is the premier publication of American fashion and is considered by most people in the fashion industry as the standard for the whole European World. The Problem for us is that Vogue is not owned by Europeans or those who identify with European heritage as such. It is owned by extremist Jews who consider themselves as a people that did not come from Europe and see themselves in conflict and competition with the European people. The S.I. Newhouse family owns Vogue as part of its magazine, newspaper and broadcasting empire. It is one of the largest media empires in the United States and across the world. A quick survey of Jewish mainstream literature reveals its deep antipathy for the European people. Whether one delves in the Jewish Encyclopedia or simply dabbles in the deluge of Holocaust material churned out by the many media outlets of the Newhouse empire, one finds that Jewish resentment against Gentiles is ubiquitous, intense and deep-seated. (more…)

Absolut Gall: We Respond

That sound you hear are millions of laughing Mexicans. Absolut Vodka needs to hear from you. An EAU response follows.

Note: European Americans United is not affiliated with my organization, EURO, European-American Unity and Rights Organization, but this is a good article and we cooperate with all pro-White organizations that abide by the Protocols adopted in New Orleans at the EURO Conference there.

Taking the Reconquista concept all the way to the end, Absolut Vodka launched an ad campaign (left) that appears on billboards and at least one magazine that features a map of the western U.S. and Mexico with nearly the entire west coast appearing as a part of Mexico. This ad appears in Quien Magazine, which is owned by Time Warner and also appears on billboards in Mexico. Quien claims a “total audience” of 513,000 readers in Mexico and the southwestern U.S.

The map covers what used to be Mexico’s claimed borders before our 1846 war with them from which the U.S. took possession of California, Texas, New Mexico, etc. But, the ad shows those states as part of Mexico with the “Estados Unidos De America” situated to the north and east of the “Absolut World” Mexico.

In a day when immigration issues are incendiary between our two countries, Time Warner accepting ads that stirs Mexico’s sentiments to “take back” parts of the U.S. (as the term Reconquista means) as their own territory is quite extraordinary.

One would think that such a hot button issue would have raised a few eyebrows with Time Warner? Even worse, this ad never raised a fuss with anyone even as ads for other products were pulled because of “offending” people.

Last year, a Snickers ad was pulled from airing on TV when gay activist groups complained that the ad, which showed two men eating a snickers and accidentally locking lips, was “offensive” to gays. A GoDaddy ad was pulled in 2005 for sexual content. A pro-life ad was even pulled in Ontario this year because the pro-life message was somehow “offensive.”

Yet, an ad showing the west coast reconquered by Mexico doesn’t raise a peep?

Source

EAU Responds

Hello!

In no uncertain terms we are writing to inform you that we utterly condemn the outrageous ad released by your company, which depicts the United States giving away its sovereign lands to Mexico. We are at the very brink of losing our nation to the Third World in terms of demographic population shifts and the spineless cowards in Washington who are allowing it to happen.

This ad insults not only our forebears who fought and bled to build this country but also contributes to the wholesale marginalization of future generations of European Americans. (more…)

How did the Diveroli family qualify for “minority ownership” preferences?

By Steve Sailer

Following up on the story of the 22-year-old international arms dealer Efraim E. Diveroli, whose AEY firm just had its $200-$300 million contract with the U.S. government yanked, I noticed that a company called Worldwide Tactical, managed by Efraim’s father Michael Diveroli, operates out of the same address in Miami Beach and has the same fax number. What caught my eye was this line on FedVendor.com form for Michael Diveroli’s Worldwide Tactical.