In Memory of Charlton Heston:

Fighting the Cultural War in America
by Charlton Heston

A few years ago I was astounded to read these courageous remarks by Charlton Heston. I am thankful to hear a man with such high esteem say essentially the same things for which I have been reviled by the liberal media. His words should be reproduced and put into the hands of every American. — David Duke

Actor Charlton Heston, born October 4, 1924, was one of some performing artists who received the Kennedy Center honors on December 6, 1997. Mr. Heston remained in Washington D.C. and addressed the 20th Anniversary of the Free Congress Foundation and the 4th Birthday of the NET TV network. The following are excerpts from his Insightful remarks. Mr. Heston and Mrs. Heston celebrated 50 years of marriage in 1994.

A cultural war is raging across our land-storming our values, assaulting our freedoms, killing our self-confidence in who we are and what we believe. (Mr. Heston then asked those present who owned a gun to raise their hand.)

I wonder how many of you own guns but chose not to raise your hand? How many of you considered revealing your conviction about a constitutional right, but then though better of it?

If so, you are a victim of the culture war being waged against traditional American freedom of beliefs and ideas. You have been assaulted and robbed of the courage of your convictions. Your pride in who you are and what you believe in has been ridiculed, ransacked, and plundered! It may be a war without a bullet or bloodshed, but with just as much liberty lost: You and your country are less free!

Because you choose to own guns- affirmed by no less than the Bill of Rights- you embrace a view at odds with the cultural war lords. If that is the outcome of cultural war, and you are the victims, I can only ask the obvious question. What will become of the right itself? Or other rights not deemed acceptable by the thought police? What other truth in your heart will you disavow with your hand? (more…)

Should the U.S. End Aid to Israel?

Funding Our Decline

By Alison Weir

April 1st I participated in a debate in San Francisco that raised the question of US aid to Israel.

It was highly appropriate that this debate was held two weeks before tax day, since in Israel’s sixty years of existence, it has received more US tax money than any other nation on earth.

During periods of recession, when Americans are thrown out of work, homes are repossessed, school budgets cut and businesses fail, Congress continues to give Israel massive amounts of our tax money; currently, about 7 million dollars per day.

On top of this, Egypt and Jordan receive large sums of money (per capita about 1/20th of what Israel receives) to buy their cooperation with Israel; and Palestinians also receive our tax money (about 1/23rd of that to Israel), to repair infrastructure that Israeli forces have destroyed, to fund humanitarian projects required due to the destruction wrought by Israel’s military, and to convince Palestinian officials to take actions beneficial to Israel. These sums should also be included in expenditures on behalf of Israel.

When all are added together, it turns out that for many years over half of all US tax money abroad has been expended to benefit a country the size of New Jersey.

It is certainly time to begin debating this disbursement of our hard-earned money. It is quite possible that we have better uses for it.

To decide whether the US should continue military aid to any nation, it is essential to examine the nature and history of the recipient nation, how it has used our military aid in the past, whether these uses are in accord with our values, and whether they benefit the American taxpayers who are putting up the money.

1. What is the history and nature of Israel?

Describing Israel is always difficult. One can either stay within the mainstream paradigm, or tell the truth. I will opt for the truth.

Drawing on scores of books by diverse authors, the facts are quite clear: Israel was created through one of the most massive, ruthless, and persistent ethnic cleansing operations of modern history. In 1947-49 about three-quarters of a million Muslims and Christians, who had originally made up 95 percent of the population living in the area that Zionists wanted for a Jewish state, were brutally forced off their ancestral land. There were 33 massacres, over 500 villages were completely destroyed, and an effort was made to erase all vestiges of Palestinian history and culture. (…Full Article)

 
Related:

The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: $3 Trillion (2003 estimate)

2008 National Faith & Freedom Conference MP3!

Thanks to the tireless efforts of the Stormfront Radio Team and the dedicated work of Pastor Thomas Robb & company, Dr. David Duke was able to deliver a last second surprise address from Europe by telephone to old friends and patriots gathered at the National Faith and Freedom Conference on Saturday evening in Harrison, AR. Although we were not able to record all of the excellent speakers at the event, in addition to David’s heartfelt address, we did manage to record the better part of an incredible speech by White Rights spokeswoman extraordinaire Rachel Pendergraft (see www.whitepride.tv). For good measure we also recorded heroic Free Speech activist Paul Fromm’s powerful keynote address Guilt No More along with a couple of inspiring songs from the angelic singing duo Heritage Connection (see www.heritageconnection.tv for free MP3s). Be sure to catch more great speeches scheduled for Sunday only on Stormfront Radio! — admin

On Anniversary of King Assassination:

We Demand That the Government Open the King Files!

Just about all Americans condemn the 1968 assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. as do we at Davidduke.com. However, we object to the sainthood bestowed on King by the political establishment and the controlled media in America. The media and government establishment pontificates about freedom of speech and freedom of information, but they have been conspicuous in their suppression of information about the true character of the “Reverend Dr.” Martin Luther King.

In truth, even the Dr. before his name is based on fraud and dishonesty. An official panel at his university found that King plagiarized 40 percent of his doctoral thesis, a dishonest act that should at least have led to a revoking of his doctorate. It is hard to compile a complete list of the numerous criminal immoralities of the “Reverend” King. He had for instance an ugly record of frequenting prostitutes and physically beating them. In one of the many FBI tapes of him with prostitutes, he is recorded with three White prostitutes screaming, “I am not a Negro now!” and I’m f—–g for God!” while he is beating one of them. Is this the man for which we should accord America’s highest honor?

From 01/19/98 Newsweek, Page 62

That night King retired to his room at the Willard Hotel. There FBI bugs reportedly picked up 14 hours of party chatter, the clinking of glasses and the sounds of illicit sex–including King’s cries of “I’m f—ing for God” and “I’m not a Negro tonight!”

(more…)

New info on–

The Vogue cover: a Jewish expression of anti-White hatred

New Information: After I posted this article, a reader pointed out to me some important new information on the origin of this disgusting cover of Vogue. The photo of Gisele Bündchen and Lebron James was done by the Jewish supremacist (for a time she even went to live on an Israeli Kibbutz) and long-time White hater, Annie Liebowitz! Liebowitz was the lesbian lover of fellow Jewish supremacist, the late Susan Sontag (real name Susan Rosenblatt). Sontag was the most well-known, undisguised hater of White people in the world. 

Sontag wrote that “Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Balanchine ballets, et al. don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history.” (Partisan Review, Winter 1967, p. 57.)

Sontag, a proud descendant of a long line of Jewish extremists, had no problem referring to the White race as the cancer of history because Jewish radicals like her don’t see themselves as White, but as a distinct people superior to all of humanity. For these Jewish supremacists, there are only two kinds of humanity, the Jewish “Chosen,” and all the rest of the world’s people who are collectively defined as Gentiles or “Goys.”

The depth of her abject hatred of European mankind and civilization can also be seen in her “apology” for the remark. Sontag didn’t apologize for saying her “cancer” remark was hateful and vicious against White people, she apologized for it being insensitive to cancer victims! In perhaps a cosmic apportionment of justice, Sontag herself became cancerous in a literal sense and died in 2004.

Wikipedia says the Vogue cover’s photographer, Annie Liebowitz, has a style “marked by a close collaboration between the photographer and the subject,” so it’s probable to assume she directed James & Bundchen’s poses as an “in your face” affront to White males and a clear lesson for White women (who are not lesbians as she is) to let themselves be taken by Black men.  As the article shows, this vicious anti-White photograph on the cover of the world’s leading fashion magazine, one owned and controlled completely by Jewish supremacists, is part of hateful pattern against White people seen throughout the Jewish-dominated news and entertainment media. — Dr. David Duke

Vogue magazine is the premier publication of American fashion and is considered by most people in the fashion industry as the standard for the whole European World. The Problem for us is that Vogue is not owned by Europeans or those who identify with European heritage as such. It is owned by extremist Jews who consider themselves as a people that did not come from Europe and see themselves in conflict and competition with the European people. The S.I. Newhouse family owns Vogue as part of its magazine, newspaper and broadcasting empire. It is one of the largest media empires in the United States and across the world. A quick survey of Jewish mainstream literature reveals its deep antipathy for the European people. Whether one delves in the Jewish Encyclopedia or simply dabbles in the deluge of Holocaust material churned out by the many media outlets of the Newhouse empire, one finds that Jewish resentment against Gentiles is ubiquitous, intense and deep-seated. (more…)

Absolut Gall: We Respond

That sound you hear are millions of laughing Mexicans. Absolut Vodka needs to hear from you. An EAU response follows.

Note: European Americans United is not affiliated with my organization, EURO, European-American Unity and Rights Organization, but this is a good article and we cooperate with all pro-White organizations that abide by the Protocols adopted in New Orleans at the EURO Conference there.

Taking the Reconquista concept all the way to the end, Absolut Vodka launched an ad campaign (left) that appears on billboards and at least one magazine that features a map of the western U.S. and Mexico with nearly the entire west coast appearing as a part of Mexico. This ad appears in Quien Magazine, which is owned by Time Warner and also appears on billboards in Mexico. Quien claims a “total audience” of 513,000 readers in Mexico and the southwestern U.S.

The map covers what used to be Mexico’s claimed borders before our 1846 war with them from which the U.S. took possession of California, Texas, New Mexico, etc. But, the ad shows those states as part of Mexico with the “Estados Unidos De America” situated to the north and east of the “Absolut World” Mexico.

In a day when immigration issues are incendiary between our two countries, Time Warner accepting ads that stirs Mexico’s sentiments to “take back” parts of the U.S. (as the term Reconquista means) as their own territory is quite extraordinary.

One would think that such a hot button issue would have raised a few eyebrows with Time Warner? Even worse, this ad never raised a fuss with anyone even as ads for other products were pulled because of “offending” people.

Last year, a Snickers ad was pulled from airing on TV when gay activist groups complained that the ad, which showed two men eating a snickers and accidentally locking lips, was “offensive” to gays. A GoDaddy ad was pulled in 2005 for sexual content. A pro-life ad was even pulled in Ontario this year because the pro-life message was somehow “offensive.”

Yet, an ad showing the west coast reconquered by Mexico doesn’t raise a peep?

Source

EAU Responds

Hello!

In no uncertain terms we are writing to inform you that we utterly condemn the outrageous ad released by your company, which depicts the United States giving away its sovereign lands to Mexico. We are at the very brink of losing our nation to the Third World in terms of demographic population shifts and the spineless cowards in Washington who are allowing it to happen.

This ad insults not only our forebears who fought and bled to build this country but also contributes to the wholesale marginalization of future generations of European Americans. (more…)

How did the Diveroli family qualify for “minority ownership” preferences?

By Steve Sailer

Following up on the story of the 22-year-old international arms dealer Efraim E. Diveroli, whose AEY firm just had its $200-$300 million contract with the U.S. government yanked, I noticed that a company called Worldwide Tactical, managed by Efraim’s father Michael Diveroli, operates out of the same address in Miami Beach and has the same fax number. What caught my eye was this line on FedVendor.com form for Michael Diveroli’s Worldwide Tactical.

(more…)

Yarmulke-wearing U.S. presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain wipes a tear away as Sen. Joe Lieberman looks on after visiting the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial in Jerusalem, Israel. McCain was also the recipient of a recent posh fundraising dinner affair in England, courtesy of the world’s largest funder of war in the world: the Rothschild family. Everyone knows McCain would be good for the war profiteers, bankers and Israeli security, but what will become of America?

John McCain’s Rothschild Connection

By Michael Collins Piper — AFP

SOME CYNICS SAY THAT Sen. John McCain’s recent visit to London to attend a fundraiser for his presidential candidacy hosted by Lord Jacob Rothschild of the international banking empire may have been quite simply a case of McCain going to Rothschild for his marching orders.

As if to underscore his allegiances, McCain preceded his trip to pay court to Lord Rothschild with a visit to Israel, the Middle East state that counts the Rothschild family as among its chief patrons, to the point that an earlier Rothschild, Edmond, of the Paris-based arm of the banking family, is honored on Israel’s currency today.

McCain was accompanied to the Rothschild gala (and to Israel) by his good friend and fellow devotee of Israel, Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), who has endorsed McCain and who is often mentioned as either a vice presidential running mate for McCain or as a likely secretary of state in a McCain administration.

Although McCain’s sponsor, Lord Rothschild (as a citizen of Britain) is not permitted by American law to make campaign contributions directly to McCain, he was permitted to host a big-ticket fundraising reception for McCain attended by Americans in the Rothschild sphere of influence who were willing to pay aminimum of $1,000 per person for the privilege of mixing it up with the American presidential candidate who is clearly the Rothschild family’s favorite.

That the Rothschild empire would support McCain should come as no surprise to those familiar with McCain’s record. (more…)