Hegemony Everywhere But At Home

By Paul Craig Roberts

What explains the fantastic amount of resources that Americans have thrown into combating a nonexistent Muslim threat to the United States, while acquiescing to decades-long encroachment by illegal aliens?

According to economic and budgetary experts, the US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq will cost Americans in excess of $3 trillion. And that might only be the beginning. Currently, the US military is violating Pakistan’s sovereignty by conducting military strikes within Pakistan’s borders, and the political regime in Washington, pushed by its Israeli overlord, has been preparing the American people for an attack on Iran.

Meanwhile, Southern California has been lost to Mexico, and Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico are not far behind. Indeed, there are now large Mexican communities almost everywhere in the United States.

How in the face of the facts did the American political mind get focused on a fabricated threat half a world away while being blinded to the cultural loss of vast chunks of US territory? Is the “war on terror” a distraction from the silent invasion that is transforming the US?

In Los Angeles County, 5.1 million people speak English; 3.9 million speak Spanish. Forty percent of all workers in Los Angeles County are illegals working for cash. Two-thirds of births in Los Angeles County are to illegal Mexicans.

Some people accept what they regard as the inevitable return of the southwest to the peoples from whom white immigrants stole it. But what this argument leaves unexplained is why the US government is so much more determined to impose its hegemony abroad than within its own borders? (more…)

Israel’s ‘Right to Exist’

“America has its own ‘Right to Exist’ and no one, not even the Jewish state, should come before our own family and friends”

By Phillip F. Tourney

I have heard it for the entirety of my 61 years of life–Israel’s ‘Right To Exist’. In fact, in recent memory I have heard this phrase more than I’ve heard ‘Happy Thanksgiving’ or ‘Merry Christmas’ or even ‘Have a Good 4th of July’.

Israel seems to exist quite well. Her people have a very high living standard compared to the rest of the world. Israel has the most sophisticated armed forces in the Middle East, if indeed not the world. According to one of our former presidents, Israel is said to possess several hundred nuclear weapons and if we are to believe some of the things said by Israel’s leaders in recent years she is ready to destroy mankind if her leaders choose to do so.

Israeli’s live a very good life style, second to none. A swimming pool in every back yard on stolen land, plenty of food, jobs, stocks, cash, you name it. Their quality of life continues to grow and prosper every month of every year.

Now what I have a problem with is this–doesn’t the United States of America also have a ‘Right to Exist’?

Yes we do, but unfortunately that right is being taken away from us every second, every minute, every hour, every month and every year and all for the sake of Israel’s ‘Right To Exist’. What’s wrong with this story? Well, I’ll explain what’s wrong with it and believe me, its not that hard to figure out.

Israel’s ‘Right To Exist’ has virtually bankrupted the United States, and all of it off the backs of hard-working Americans for the last sixty years. We’ve given Israel untold billions of dollars NEVER TO BE REPAID, to say nothing of the military hardware in the billions we (I should say the United States) just flat-out gives them, including free training for their fighter pilots.

The United States continues to supply Israel with cash payments every day in the millions of dollars, and remember–THIS IS BORROWED MONEY. Do you understand this my fellow Americans? We borrow money for the sake of Israel but yet we do not barrow it for the sake and safety of our own citizens. This money must be paid back by us our children, their children and their children and this cycle will never be broken until the Untied States gives up its passionate attachment to the Jewish state. (more…)

“Why must we die in the Mideast and elsewhere? Why are Americans being kidnapped, tortured, murdered throughout the world? How long will it be until terrorism comes to our own shores with a vengeance?” …

“Americans will go to endless wars. We will die or be maimed by the thousands. Our economy will be bankrupted; the rest of our freedoms will be taken away in the name of security. America under this nefarious control will behave like third world regimes and kidnap and torture suspects. America will adopt all the brutality that we always despised in the Communists, because the Neocons, actually are at root, Trotskyites not Conservatives. Strange as that might sound, its true.”…

“In the Lavon Affair the Israeli government was caught red-handed in launching terror bombing attacks against American facilities in Egypt. Yet, due to the naked supremacy of Jewish extremists over the American media, most Americans don’t even know Israel has admittedly committed terrorism against us. Is the fact we don’t know not proof of their control over us?”

The following is a speech given by Representative David Duke at a local Rotary Club at the end of his term as the elected Chairman of the Republican Party. It was a few weeks after the attack on the USS Cole in 2000, and a few months prior to 9/11. It was shortly before his departure to Europe to teach and work on his PhD. The Rotarians expected a light, toastmasters speech, but they heard something quite different. There was polite applause at the end, but a somber mood because the audience sensed the truth of the speech, and the danger that America faced. One of those present recently sent an email to www.davidduke.com with the scanned the text of the speech that Duke gave out afterward. He said he kept it during these years and wrote that no speech he ever heard had more impact on him. “Every time I watch the evening news,” he wrote, “I think back at this short speech and realize that we are living it today.” Everything David Duke predicted has come to pass: a major terrorist attack on American shores, new American wars for Israel in the Mideast, new laws restricting American freedom and the bankrupting of America in part from these conflicts. Here is the text of this prophetic and powerful speech. As you read it you will immediately understand why David Duke is so evilly slandered and misrepresented in the press, he speaks with a courage and intellect unequaled by any political figure in modern America.

I Tremble for America!

Mr. Chairman, fellow members of the Rotary. Usually, these meetings are focused on local issues, light issues. My talk today is not. It is focused on a national, indeed an international issue that reaches right down into the heart of our community. It will powerfully affect you and your children.It is not a happy subject and I hope my words don’t interfere with your digestion of our good Louisiana strawberry pie desert. But, as you know, I represented this area, and most of you here voted for me, and the rest should have!But it’s too late; Governor Edwards has already sold the whole damn state!And I have never been one to shrink from controversy. I just finished my term as a Republican Chairman in St. Tammany, and I plan to pursue some academic goals in the near future, so I don’t need to be at all politically correct.And I don’t think you really want me to be! So here goes.I tremble for my country.

Just a few weeks ago, an American US Navy Ship was attacked in Yemeni. Seventeen of our sailors died. I have great anger against the perpetrators of this surprise, dastardly attack and pray they will be brought to justice swiftly.

But, I also must ask the question,” Why?”

Why are Americans becoming so hated?

Why must we die in the Mideast and elsewhere? Why are Americans being kidnapped, tortured, murdered throughout the world? How long will it be until terrorism comes to our own shores with a vengeance? (more…)

Confronting the Cult of
‘the Corpulent Con Man’

Veteran Christian nationalist Willis Carto scares arch-Zionist preacher John Hagee half to death

By Michael Collins Piper
Mike Piper on the Radio

Dripping in diamonds and gold and draped in designer clothes, hundreds of well-heeled supporters of Texas evangelist John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel poured into the Washington Convention Center, July 21-24, for Hagee’s third annual “Israel Summit.”

Big on the agenda was promotion of Israel’s—and Hagee’s—long-standing demand that the United States destroy the Islamic Republic of Iran. Joining the applause for Hagee’s campaign was Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Sallai Meridor, a featured speaker at Hagee’s “Night to Honor Israel” banquet on July 21.

Critics say Hagee’s outfit is cult-like and not Christian at all, and that it places worship of the modern-day state of Israel (and the Jewish people) at its center, rather than devotion to Jesus Christ and His teachings. With this in mind, some traditional Bible-believing Christians greeted Hagee and his followers outside the convention center, waving picket signs and distributing literature exposing the un-Biblical and un-Christian nature of Hagee’s theology.

These critics patiently explained to Hagee devotees who dared to listen that Hagee’s theology is not Biblical in origin, but rather a product of the late 18th century and only came to popular attention in the mid-20th century. Critics denounced Hagee as a “Judas goat” and as a “false prophet” and urged him to repudiate the anti-Christ teachings of the Jewish Talmud.

Among those seeking to educate Hagee’s followers was AFP correspondent Willis Carto, joined by AFP staffers Vince Ryan, Steve Lombardo, Mike Piper, AFP contributor Pete Papaheraklus, as well as veteran Christian writer E. Stanley Rittenhouse and others. (more…)

BOB’S MANTRA

Africa for the Africans. Asia for the Asians. White Countries for Everybody?

From Robert Whitaker

“Liberals and respectable conservatives agree there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to it?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

Bob Whitaker

 
Bob Whitaker Radio Interview — or try here!

 
Source: Whitakeronline.org

The Real Reconquista—Mass Immigration and American Sovereignty

By Mark Krikorian

The boasts by Mexican nationalists about “reconquista” used to sound comical to most American ears, little more than banana-republic bravado. Americans who took this reconquista rhetoric seriously were breezily dismissed as cranks or alarmists, “black helicopter” people imagining world events controlled by the Trilateral Commission or, worse, by the Elders of Zion.

But as Mexican immigration—most of it illegal—has continued at levels unprecedented in history and as illegal aliens have massed in the streets issuing demands to the American people, concern over reconquista has entered the mainstream. Ron Maxwell, for instance, acclaimed film director of “Gettysburg” and “Gods and Generals,” wrote in an open letter to President Bush in the Washington Times in 2006 that “It may already be too late to avoid a future annexation of the Southwest by Mexico or the evolution of a Mexican-dominated satellite state.” Syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin wrote a piece in May 2006 entitled “Reconquista Is Real.”

This concern is justified, as this chapter will outline. But the specific outcome that these writers point to is not going to happen. There will be no secession of the Southwest from the Union. Even if federal immigration policy remains unchanged and artificially creates a Hispanic majority in the Southwest (something that the 2007 Bush-Kennedy amnesty bill would have accelerated), there are still too many non-Hispanics, and too much diversity of opinion among Hispanics themselves, for a successful irredentist movement—where an ethnic group breaks away and joins its co-ethnics in a neighboring state.

But that doesn’t mean there isn’t a problem. Mass immigration under modern conditions is bringing about a kind of reconquista—it’s just not the old-fashioned version where territory is lost, but rather a new, 21st century variety. What we are seeing, right now, is the gradual development of a new constitutional order of shared sovereignty, where the nominal borders stay the same but, through an accumulation of seemingly small American capitulations, the Mexican government gradually acquires more and more authority over the decision-making of federal, state, and local governments all over the United States—i.e., it expands its sovereignty beyond its nominal borders. Under the pretext of protecting its compatriots (a group of people which Mexico defines very broadly, as we’ll see below), Mexico City is moving toward becoming, in effect, a second federal government that American mayors and governors must answer to.

 
Continue at TakiMag.com

Hear David Duke’s Broadcast on “The Death of a White Girl” or Download

Jana Shearer:
The Defilement and Death
of a White Girl

How Life Imitates Film

By David Duke

In Tyler Texas a pretty, young White woman, Jana Shearer, 21, met and started dating a Black man by the name of Christopher McCuin. She didn’t worry about the fact that he was a multiple felon or that he was Black, for during her entire life the media taught her that dating Blacks is a very desirable thing, even a fashionable thing to do, and like most young White girls today, she was saturated with the idea that resisting the social and sexual advances of Black males was tantamount to the greatest sin, that of racism. She gave into these converging forces and now she is dead.

With her natural defenses stripped away, the innocent girl was easy prey for the street wise McCuin. Ultimately, Jana paid for her media-induced naivety with her life, even her very flesh. To quote the Associated Press on January 9, 2008:

TYLER, Texas (AP) January 9, 2008 — A man killed his girlfriend, then filleted and cooked parts of her body before calling police to tell them what he was doing, authorities said Sunday.

Christopher Lee McCuin, 25, called 911 on Saturday and told an emergency dispatcher he had killed Jana Shearer, 21, and was boiling her body parts at his mother’s home, said Smith County Sheriff J.B. Smith.

When authorities arrived at the home, they found Shearer’s mutilated body, one ear boiling in a pot of water on the stove and a fork sticking out of some human flesh sitting on a plate on the kitchen table.

Before the long campaign of Hollywood movies and TV production to make race-mixing fashionable, quiet and decent young southern girls in Texas would not have considered having a relationship with a Black man, much less one with a criminal record. That was the time when love for your heritage, and loyalty to it was something carried, as they say, from generation to generation in the mother’s milk. (more…)

Newsweek Magazine Covers Up McCain’s Mob Ties

One of the biggest stories of modern political history is consistently being suppressed by the controlled media

By Michael Collins Piper — AFP

Newsweek—one of the big three “news” magazines—has demonstrated beyond question that the American media is determined to cover up the organized crime origins of the fortune that set John McCain’s political career in motion and made him one of the richest men in Congress.

On June 30, Newsweek published a glowing cover story about McCain’s second (and current) wife, the former Cindy Hensley, featuring a glamorous cover photo of Mrs. McCain, followed by eight full pages of friendly reportage, including another glamour photo of the attractive woman draped across two pages. Mrs. McCain, so it seems, may be a candidate for sainthood.

Although Newsweek said Mrs. McCain’s family “is deeply rooted in Arizona,” and that her late father, Jim Hensley, “was one of the most prominent men in the state,” who was “a World War II bombardier . . . shot down over the English channel,”—in other words, a war hero just like McCain—Newsweek did not even hint of the racketeering and corruption (and murder) associated with Hensley and his patrons in his rise to power.

Newsweek said Hensley “borrowed $10,000 to start a liquor business” which became one of the largest Anheuser-Busch distributorships in the country and pointed out that the vast Hensley influence and fortune (worth $200 million) “got [McCain] access to money and connections” after he divorced his ailing first wife and married his then-mistress, Cindy Hensley, and settled in Arizona where he first ran for office in 1982. What Newsweek chose not to mention is what AFP previously reported:

McCain’s father-in-law got his start as the top henchman for Kemper Marley, who, for 40 years until his death in 1990, was the undisputed political boss of Arizona, acting as the behind-the-scenes power over both the Republican and Democratic parties. But Marley was more than a politician. He was the Meyer Lansky crime syndicate’s chief Arizona operative, front man for the Bronfman family—key players in the Lansky syndicate. (more…)

Prospective presidential puppet, Barack Obama, reported to Israel this week, you can see a photo essay documenting his groveling at the link below:

Barack Obama Arrives In Jerusalem

Turning the Tables on the Israel-Firsters

By Michael Scheuer

Now that the dust has settled in the spat between journalist Joe Klein and the ideologues at Commentary, it is time to regret the ink spilled over the non-issue of “dual loyalties.” The idea that there are U.S. citizens who have equal loyalties to the United States and Israel is passé. American Israel-firsters have long since dropped any pretense of loyalty to the United States and its genuine national interests. They have moved brazenly into the Israel first, last, and always camp. Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Norman Podhoretz, Victor Davis Hanson, the Rev. Franklin Graham, Alan Dershowitz, Rudy Giuliani, Douglas Feith, the Rev. Rod Parsley, Paul Wolfowitz, James Woolsey, Bill Kristol, the Rev. John Hagee, and the thousands of wealthy supporters of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) appear to care about the United States only so far as Washington is willing to provide immense, unending funding and the lives of young U.S. service personnel to protect Israel. These individuals and their all-for-Israel journals – Commentary, National Review, the Weekly Standard, and the Wall Street Journal – amount to nothing less than a fifth column intent on involving 300 million Americans in other peoples’ religious wars, making them pay and bleed to protect a nation in which the United States has no genuine national security interest at stake.

The Israel-firsters’ success is, of course, the stuff of which legends are made. Most recently, for example, we heard President Bush echo Sen. Lieberman’s insane and subversive contention that the United States has a “duty” to ensure the fulfilling of God’s millennia-old promise to Abraham regarding the creation and survival of Israel. Bush told the Knesset all Americans are ready to endlessly bleed and pay to ensure Israel’s security. And where does the president derive authority to make such a commitment in the name of his countrymen? From the Constitution? On the basis of America’s dominant religion? From – heaven forbid – a thoughtful, hardheaded analysis of U.S. interests?

No, Bush’s pledge was based on none of these. Bush’s decision to more deeply involve America in the eternal Arab-Israeli war was based on nothing less than the corruption wrought on the American political system by the Israel-firsters, AIPAC’s enormous treasury, and the lamentable but growing influence of America’s leading evangelical Protestant preachers.

The Israel-firsters started the Iraq war and now have the United States locked into an occupation of that country that may not end in any of our lifetimes. Unless Americans ignore the likes of Hanson, Podhoretz, Lieberman, Woolsey, and Wolfowitz, the cost in blood and treasure will ultimately bankrupt America.

 
Continue at AntiWar.com

Here is a disturbing collection of Youtubes that expose AIPAC one of the most infamous Jewish organizations that make up the Israel Lobby:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y8pnWCNEPA

——————–
2 of 5 (more…)

This is it! This article is the best I have read concerning the Zionist influence and power over the foreign policy of the United States. Among many important points, it completely blows away the “War for Oil” lies surrounding the Iraq War and the planned Iran War. For instance it shows how although Iran has huge untapped supplies and oil and gas, which American-based oil companies would love to develop, present Jewish Neocon policy makes it illegal for them to enter agreements with Iran, completely against the economic interests of the oil companies. It also points that so-called big oil had absolutely no direct lobbying effort for the Iraq War, while the Jewish Extremists had nonstop agitation for the war both on lobbying and media level. Every intelligent person in the United States and around the world needs to read this article, study it and think about it. As America and the world tightens sanctions against Iran and continues to commit acts of war (such as embargoes) against that country, everyone must consider the human and economic catastrophe of this new war planned for Israel.  One more point, Petras also exposes how the leading so-called liberals who dismiss the power of the Jewish Lobby and use the “War for Oil” argument, happen to be Jews (such as Chomsky). Coincidence? Those who claim Big Oil is the culprit in effect shield the real power behind these policies and war that are catastrophic to America and the world.  –Dr. David Duke

 Israel’s War with Iran and the Zionist Power Configuration in America

Zionists and their allies in Congress authored, implemented and enforced sanctions against Iran, which hinder the ambitions of the world’s biggest oil and gas companies

By Dr. James Petras

“My strong preference here is to handle all this (US conflict with Iran) diplomatically with the other powers of government, ours and many others as opposed to any kind of strike occurring… From the US perspective, from the United States military perspective in particular, opening up a third front (Israeli and/or US act of war against Iran) would be extremely stressful to us”
Testimony of Admiral Michael Mulligan, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. July 2, 2008.

“If Iran continues its nuclear arms program – we will attack it. The sanctions aren’t effective. There will be no choice but to attack Iran to halt the Iranian nuclear program.”
Shaul Mofaz, Israeli Minister of Transportation in Yediot Ahronot , June 6, 2008.

“The present economic sanctions on Iran have exhausted themselves. Iranian businesspeople who would not be able to land anywhere in the world would pressure the regime.”
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, speaking to US House Speaker, Senator Nancy Pelosi in favor of a unilateral, pre-emptive US naval blockade of Iran. (Haaretz May 21, 2008.)

“It was a triumphalist conference. Even this powerful organization (AIPAC), the most powerful group in the US Israel lobby, had never seen anything like. Seven thousand Jewish functionaries from all over the United States came together to accept the obeisance of the entire Washington elite. The three presidential hopefuls (Hillary went too) made speeches, trying to outdo each other in flattery. Three hundred senators and members of Congress crowded the hallways. Everybody who wanted to be elected or re-elected to any office came to see and be seen.”
Uri Avnery, London Review of Books, July 3, 2008. page 18

House Resolution 362 received unanimous support from all the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations including the 7,000 delegation attending the AIPAC Conference in Washington DC on June 2-4, 2008.

“Resolution 362 became our chief legislative priority”, according to AIPAC’s website, June 4, 2008.

“The President should prohibit the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products imposing stringent inspection requirements in all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains and cargo ships enters and departing Iran.”
US House Resolution 362 introduced May 22, 2008.

Resolution 362 gained 170 co-sponsors or nearly 40% of the House and 19 co-sponsors in the Senate in less than a month.

Introduction

Zionists and their allies in Congress authored, implemented and enforced sanctions against Iran, which hinder the ambitions of the world’s biggest oil and gas companies. Israeli war exercises and public declarations threatening a massive air assault on Iran has pushed petroleum prices to world records. This spring 2008, the most powerful pro-Israel Jewish Lobby in the US, AIPAC held their annual conference and secured the support and commitment of both major US Presidential candidates and the majority of US members of Congress for an Israeli initiative to impose extreme economic sanctions on Iran with threats of a US/Israeli military attack. (more…)

Heretical Two Seek Political Asylum in U.S.

The pair fled a thought crime prosecution in Britain for offending non-Whites.

By Jeff Davis – EURO

The Yorkshire Post tells the story: “Two men convicted of publishing race-hate” [i.e. racially truthful] “articles on the internet have skipped bail and fled to the United States to claim political asylum…Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle were given bail by a judge at Leeds Crown Court on Friday, despite having been found guilty of a series of race-related offences. The pair were due to return to court on Monday while a jury continued deliberating over further charges, but they failed to show up… Last night Sheppard, 51, and Whittle, 41, were being held by immigration officials at Los Angeles Airport outside the jurisdiction of the British court system. It is believed that the pair travelled from the UK to Ireland by ferry before taking a direct flight to Los Angeles. They are likely to have their case considered at an immigration hearing in the US before UK authorities can secure their return.”

There’s just one little problem with White men trying to use political asylum laws: These laws are not meant to protect REAL victims of political persecution, especially pro-White activists, who speak the truth about racial differences or the Holocaust.

US political asylum laws are meant to allow in a flood of Chinese coolies, Haitian boat people and every imaginable Third World race, who are all making false political asylum claims. That’s how political asylum laws work in the US (and various nations of Europe). After making a false asylum claim, the illegal immigrant is released pending a hearing, usually with some kind of temporary visa that allows him every privilege native-born Americans have, including the right to work legally. Many of these invaders are coached by liberal activist groups in what stories to tell to the immigration authorities and the sympathetic media, and how to tell them. (more…)

Two Pro-Enforcement Democratic Incumbents Handily Defeat Primary Challenges

By Roy Beck

We have good results from Primary elections for two Democratic incumbent congressmen who bucked their Party leadership on immigration. Both faced vigorous Primary challenges from candidates backed by Democrats who said the incumbents were too centrist. We are well aware that Democrats who stand for reduced immigration levels will do better in the General elections, but we are particularly gratified to see that standing for sensible immigration also is a good political sell in Democratic Primaries.

And in the other Party, the Republican freshman who has earned the second best immigration grade of the entire 535-Member Congress beat back a Primary challenge from his District’s Party and business establishment. (More on Paul Broun below.)

SAVE Act Hero, Rep. Barrow, Wins In Georgia

I was especially excited to see Rep. John Barrow (D-Ga.) win his Savannah District Primary. Having narrowly been elected to Congress in 2004, he had immediately established himself on immigration issues as a friend of the common working man and woman and the middle-class taxpayers.

He has earned the 11th best immigration-reduction grade among all Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Barrow is one of only a dozen Democrats brave enough to buck House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and sign the Discharge Petition to force a vote on the SAVE Act (sponsored by another freshman Democrat Heath Shuler of North Carolina).

At a NumbersUSA event this spring, Barrow gave a stirring speech about the importance of standing up for true Democratic Party values in protecting the most vulnerable workers in society. He said if the Democratic leadership won’t stand for the principles of protecting American workers from unfair foreign labor importation, he will always be willing to oppose his Party for the sake of the voters of his District.

 
Continue at NumbersUSA

Barack Obama welcomes guests at the annual White Pride Convention – (Just Kidding)

By Jason Robb

I thought that would grab your attention. It’s almost funny to think that Barack Obama would actually attend and seek support or encourage White pride at any White Nationalist meeting. Well, why not, he received a warm welcome from the annual NAACP convention Monday night, and just recently spoke at the National Conference of La Raza (which means the Race), the national Mexican group that is attempting to break the Western states from the United States and reclaim it for Mexico. It is an organization that doesn’t want any border security on our Mexican border, a policy that would have dire consequences for America. McCain as well spoke at La Raza and is planning to speak at the NAACP convention this coming Wednesday. It seems that both of these Senators are actively trying to seek support from Mexicans, African Americans, Homosexuals, Chinese, Vietnamese, Indians, Mongs, Eskimos, Aborigines, etc. Hopefully, I haven’t left any group out. Oh, what about the Whites? They are no big deal. As you can tell, I’m hoping to show the irony here that “mainstream” candidates are trying to seek support from every group imaginable except the whites, the biggest racial group in the United States. Seems kind of crazy doesn’t it?  You don’t see these senators speaking at Council of Conservative Citizens or the Euro Conference with David Duke and Don Black. Why? Because they don’t care about the unique and precious culture of White-Europeans. They don’t care if it is destroyed. If they did, they would be making statements about it. Either way, Whites lose in November on election day. No matter who wins, this election will make it clear to White Americans that they must now support an uncompromising Movement for our European American Heritage and Freedom.

Source: Jason Robb Esq.