Barack Obama’s Big Secret Could Ruin 2008 Bid

One of the most powerful voting blocs in the U.S. today—and one which almost unanimously votes Democrat—is concerned about the leanings of Sen. Barack Obama. Does this segment of the population hold the key to 2008?

By Michael Collins Piper — AFP

ALTHOUGH THE MASS MEDIA ballyhooed Barack Obama’s visits to a number of countries, greeted with large, enthusiastic crowds—even in Germany, said to be the bastion of “race hatred” in the 20th Century—the media notably failed to mention that in Israel—America’s “closest ally”—polls have shown John McCain is more popular than Obama. In fact, Israel is the only country in the world where McCain’s popularity outranked that of Obama.

That single fact—a not insignificant one, considering the clout of Israel’s supporters in the U.S. arena— might be described as “the big secret” of the 2008 election that the average voter knows little about.

In contrast, McCain’s popularity in Israel—coupled with serious reservations about Obama among both Israelis and American Jews—has been a staple of reportage in Israel and in American Jewish community journals and on Internet sites aimed at that audience.

Forward—perhaps the most influential Jewish newspaper in America—let the cat out of the bag on July 17, when it revealed:

Polls indicate that Israelis evince some of the lowest levels of support for Obama of any country in the world.

In France and Germany, both stops on Obama’s tour, respectively 65 percent and 67 percent of the population has said that they would vote for him if they could.

By contrast, in Israel . . . only 27 percent of the respondents said that they would like to see him become president, with John McCain being the preferred choice of 36 percent. . . .

Now, although it is being said that Obama’s popularity has risen in Israel since his visit, those claims seem disingenuous, a feeble attempt to show that Israel is “in sync” with the rest of the world, when, in fact, it is not.

The truth is that many Obama supporters have been astounded by the revelation that there has been such a striking contrast between polls in Israel and those in all other countries regarding Obama and McCain. (more…)

The following quotation is from the Jewish magazine Moment. You can read the entire article at the link below. In the America of today, only Jews are permitted to point out the Jewish control of the single most important factor in elections: money. Jews can also boast, usually only in their own publications, of their incredible dominance of the entertainment and news media. If a European-American such as Dr. David Duke dares to point out how Jewish money and connections in politics and Jewish influence in mass media have had such an unholy influence on things such as the catastrophe of the Iraq War and selling out American interests to Israel, he endures incredible criticism and character assassination. Yet, the Jewish political and media influence is undeniable..

Their influence and their ability to use can be seen in their treatment of our own Dr. David Duke. Note that even though it has been 30 years since David Duke was member of the Klan, every news article that mentions his name introduces him “former Klan leader David Duke,” not as “former Representative David Duke.” Sen. Robert Byrd, a former Klan officer in his youth, is never introduced in a news article as “former Klansman Robert Byrd.” What’s the difference? One big difference is that Byrd doesn’t criticize Jewish extremist influence over American politics and the American media, and like every other U.S. Senator,  he puts Israel’s interest over that of America’s. The late Martin Luther King is almost always identified as Dr. Martin Luther King in media articles. David Duke, although a bona fide PhD, is never identified as Dr. David Duke in the press. Nelson Mandela is canonized daily in the American press although Mandela was a bona fide terrorist who planned and carried out bombings of civilian targets. David Duke never had even an allegation of violence against anyone, and he has always condemned violence in stark contrast to the sainted Mandela, but Mandela is never introduced as “former terrorist bomber, Nelson Mandela.” Jewish extremist influence in media is perfectly illustrated by their treatment of Dr. Duke (who they see as an enemy) as compared to Robert Byrd, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela. This article in Moment shows once again that Jewish Israeli partisans will control the next President of the United States on November 4th, just as they have previous Presidents. Dr. David Duke is the best known political figure in America to point that out, and now you know why he is so attacked by the media. –staff

When Money Grows On Jewish Trees

In the 2008 election cycle, the Jewish “network” has helped raise more money than any other cycle in history

By Benjamin Schuman-Stoler from Moment Magazine

No matter how much they emphasize their differences from one another on the campaign trail, Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama and Republican nominee John McCain share a common denominator: Jewish fundraisers. Penny Pritzker serves as Obama’s national finance chair, and Elliott Broidy is the Republican National Committee finance committee chairman.

Through early June, Pritzker helped bring in more than $265 million for the Obama campaign; the Democratic National Committee collected an additional $80 million. Broidy amassed over $165 million for the RNC, while McCain’s campaign brought in $96 million. These amounts are nothing to scoff at, and they highlight the influence of Jews in American presidential races. For More