Dr. David Duke Speaks on Olympic China A brief commentary on the Olympics in China and the racial lessons it teaches. Feel free to circulate these radio shows far and wide!

Rep. Duke’s, Saturday, August 9th broadcast or Download
–Strong Comments on Olympic Racial China — Its Lessons!

Hear David Duke’s Interview with a Reporter from the Clarion Ledger
–The Clarion Ledger Interviews Dr. Duke about Obama —Publishes Typically Biased Article

Rep. Duke’s, Sunday, August 3rd broadcast or Download
–Dr. Duke Comments on some of the Major Issues Facing Europeans and Americans

Rep. Duke’s, Wednesday, July 30th broadcast or Download
–David Duke Recreates His: ‘I Tremble for America’ Speech Delivered in 2000 Before the Rotary! - [Text]

Rep. Duke’s, Friday, July 25th broadcast or Download
–Jane Shearer Update: The Defilement and Death of a White Girl

Rep. Duke’s, Wednesday, July 23rd broadcast or Download
–David Duke Interviews Bruno Gollnisch on Freedom of Speech and Saving our Heritage

David Duke on the Dino Costa Radio Program — Denver Colorado!
–Popular Talkshow Host Dino Costa Does A No-Holds-Barred Interview With David Duke!

Rep. Duke’s, Tuesday, July 15th broadcast or Download
–David Duke Interviews Rev. Ted Pike!

Rep. Duke’s, Sunday, July 13th broadcast or Download
–One of Dr. Duke’s most powerful broadcasts ever: “Questions to Prevent the Planned War in Iran!”

Hear David Duke’s Speeches at EURO-RUS 2008!
–Video, Speeches and Photos from the EURO-RUS International Conference! (more…)

–Image: Happier times when Solzhenitsyn could not put a foot wrong. Then he did, and he wandered into the ranks of The Undead.

David Irving comments: I HAVE always had a warm spot for Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, and not only because he wrote to me, out of the blue from his exile in Vermont, a fine handwritten letter praising my earliest book The Destruction of Dresden, USA, many years ago.

He was a brave man, and it is interesting to see that despite his immense prestige as a Nobel Prize winner, the traditional enemies of the truth have had no hesitation in targeting him for his revelations about their prominent role in the Soviet terror system.

It is almost as though they still hanker after those good ole times.

His condemnation of the Soviet terror system and the Jewish role therein was nothing new of course: as early as 1920 Winston Churchill wrote an article in a London illustrated magazine, before he was bought off by that big cheque from Sir Robert Waley-Cohen in July 1936, excoriating them for this particularly ugly facet of the their past.

But that was years before the Holocaust and its associated media industry brought down a fire-safety curtain blotting out all such critical references to their more controversial achievements.

Solzhenitsyn’s courage deserves even greater posthumous recognition in consequence.

Sharansky lauds Solzhenitsyn’s influence on Soviet Jewry movement

By Ben Harris

NEW YORK (JTA) — Amid the haystack of laudatory prose evoked this week by the death of one of the titans of Russian literature was this far less flattering needle: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was dogged, particularly in his later years, by charges he harbored deep anti-Semitic prejudice.

[Nathan] Sharansky, who along with Solzhenitsyn is among the most famous inmates and chroniclers of the Soviet labor camp system, says those charges should be understood in context.

“I don’t think that he has any special prejudice,” Sharansky told JTA. “He had a big interest in defending the Russian nationalism, the Russian pride. Also he wanted to unmask the evils of the empire. While studying it, he discovered — it was very easy to discover — that among the architects of this gulag system, meaning this system of imprisonment, were many, many Jews. (…Full Article)

 When will the news media in America accord David Duke his proper title of Dr. David Duke, who has a doctorate legitimate as the frequently press-described “Dr.” Martin Luther King, Jr. ?

From 2005 — Awarding of Dr. David Duke an PhD in History by the Rector and Council Secretary –

Below — Original Text from Ukrainian Jewish Blogs– The article is very critical of Dr. Duke and the university but they acknowledge it is one of the leading universities of Eastern Europe, fully-accredited, and they list the professors who presided over his doctoral defense (the traditional academic challenge of a thesis). A number of them were  among the academic elite and high government officials in Ukraine. In the three years since earning his doctorate, the mainstream press has yet to accord him his well-earned  proper title in a single news article. A Google search comes up with 3,050,000 references for “Dr. Martin Luther King“. Is Dr. only a legitimate title for those you like and banned for those you don’t? Is that what fair and unbiased journalism is about? — staff

Latest news **translated by H. Friedman, Kiev**

Jewish leaders in Ukraine are condemning the actions of a major university in Ukraine (MAUP) for awarding a full doctorate to the notorious American anti-Semite David Duke.

MAUP, an acronym for the largest university system in Ukraine, awarded the controversial former KKK leader and American politician, David Duke, a PhD in History after a successful completion of exams and all doctoral academic requirements, and a spirited Doctoral Defense in an art-adorned academic conference hall adjacent to the office of the MAUP President Prof. Georgy Tchokin.

MAUP is one of the leading Universities in Ukraine as well as Eastern Europe. Formerly a national university system run by the Ukrainian government, it was privatized after the fall of communism. It has grown to over 51,000 students with branches throughout Ukraine. Cooperative arrangements exist with other universities in a number of other nations and it has the highest academic accreditation possible both in Ukraine (4) and on the international level. UNESCO recognizes the MAUP university system as one the world’s high-level educational institutions. MAUP is the source of most of the bachelor and post-graduate degrees of the Ukranian Government officials and administrators. Such influence over governmental employees disturbs many Jews in the Ukraine who are concerned about lingering anti-Semitism. (more…)

Gordon Thomas has spent his life researching the world’s most infamous intelligence agencies, he says the most amazing and extraordinary of them all is Israel’s Mossad, you can hear him recount some of the Mossad’s dubious handywork on the TruNews Radio interview below — admin

Gideon’s Spies: Mossad’s Secret Warriors

The Mossad was formed in 1951 to coordinate the intelligence-gathering efforts of the still-young nation of Israel. In the nearly half century since, it has become a force to be reckoned with, boasting an impressive track record of counterterrorist actions and assassinations. Gideon’s Spies is loaded with anecdotes of their greatest exploits (and a few colossal blunders). Among the most interesting sections are the suggestions that Mossad agents killed media tycoon Robert Maxwell in 1991, that the agency’s attempted recruitment of Henri Paul, the driver of Princess Diana’s car that fateful night, may have caused sufficient emotional distress to be a contributing factor in the accident, and that Mossad operatives in America had tapes of the phone-sex conversations between President Bill Clinton and his lover Monica Lewinsky. There’s also some extensive material on the links between the Israelis and the Vatican, including the Mossad’s role in the investigation into the attempted 1981 assassination of Pope John Paul II and the agency’s constant battles against the PLO. An interesting nonfiction read for fans of international spy thrillers. — Amazon.com

Gordon Thomas is author of 53 books, with total sales exceeding 45 million copies. His bestseller Gideon’s Spies: Mossad’s Secret Warriors (1999 St. Martin’s Press) has been published in 55 countries and has been extensively revised in 2008. His most recent book is The Assassination of Robert Maxwell: Israel’s Super Spy (Carroll & Graf, New York).

 
Gordon Thomas Interviewed On TruNews Radio

 
Source: TruNews.com

The Anthrax Attacks and the Assault on Civil Liberties

By Paul Craig Roberts

In last weekend’s edition of CounterPunch, Alexander Cockburn updates the ongoing persecution of Sami Al-Arian by federal prosecutors. Al-Arian was a Florida university professor of computer science who was ensnared by the Bush Regime’s need to produce “terrorists” in order to keep Americans fearful and, thereby, amenable to the Bush Regime’s assault on US civil liberties.

The charges against Al-Arian were rejected by a jury, but the Bush Regime could not accept the obvious defeat. If Al-Arian was not a terrorist, then other of the Bush Regime’s fabricated cases might fall apart, too.

In open view, the US Department of Justice (sic) proceeded to trash every known ethical rule of prosecution. I don’t need to repeat the facts, as they are covered by Cockburn’s articles and in The Tyranny of Good Intentions.

Instead, I want to point out another meaning of the Al-Arian case. The Justice (sic) Department itself knows that it is persecuting a totally innocent person for reasons of a political agenda—the need to convince gullible Americans of an ongoing terrorist threat. The existence of this threat is used to justify the Bush Regime’s adoption of police state measures, such as spying on Americans without warrants, arresting them without charges, and refusing to let go of them when they are cleared by juries.

Sami Al-Arian is a fabricated terrorist created by federal prosecutors and judges in behalf of an undeclared agenda. The Al-Arian case proves that terrorists are in short supply and that the Bush Regime has had to create them out of total innocents. The “War on Terror” is a hoax used to justify war crimes and the overthrow of America’s civil liberties.

The anthrax scare is one more example of the Bush Regime’s use of disinformation to advance an undeclared political agenda.  As Glenn Greenwald reminded us last week in Salon, the Bush Regime used Brian Ross at ABC News to spread the lie far and wide that US government tests proved that the anthrax mailed to various Americans, including prominent US Senators, was made in Iraq by Saddam Hussein. This lie was essential for scaring Congress into passing the Bush Regime’s Gestapo laws, such as the PATRIOT Act, and for overcoming opposition to invading Iraq. (more…)

The man behind Obama: Axelrod, a man Israel’s Maariv paper would describe as a “warm Jew,” that is defined as a man very conscious of his Jewishness and the interests of the Jewish people.

David Duke Comments: Did you expect anything else? The same pattern can be seen in Tony Blair’s Lord Levy, and in Bush’s coterie of Jewish supremacists politely called “Neocons.” The following are some quotes and link to The Guardian newspaper in Britain on the new power behind the presumptive President on the American throne.

He’s the man who makes Obama run ( a very “warm” Jew)With his bushy moustache and piercing, no-nonsense gaze, the 53-year-old journalist turned political consultant has been a central presence in the presidential campaign. No one in the inner circle of Obama’s aides has known the junior senator for Illinois longer; they first met during a voter-registration drive in Chicago in 1992, five years before Obama first won public office, in the state legislature. No one is closer to him.

Axelrod was born in New York’s Lower East Side and raised in Manhattan. His father was a psychologist, his mother a journalist for the city’s crusading left-wing 1940s newspaper, PM.

‘My father died 31 years ago …’ and described him as my ‘best friend and hero’, an immigrant who had fled the anti-Jewish pogroms of eastern Europe

Guardian Link

The Blessings of Immigration and Diversity

The following opinion piece appeared in Britain’s Telegraph. It talks about a gruesome gang rape and mutilation of a school girl by “five black youths.”  Gang rapes were simply unheard of in the 1950s and 60s before massive immigration. In fact, I can’t think of such a gruesome group attack, punctuated with the use of caustic Drano, on any poor girl, by Whites in that period.  Yet, this kind of evil and brutality has become quite common not just in London, but in Stockholm, Sweden, Frankfurt, Germany and is in no way out of the ordinary in hundreds of American cities. Yet, somehow, those of us who have warned of the dangers of immigration for years have been characterized as the evil ones. Yet, if we had our way, the evil that occurred to this school girl would not have been done. In 1976 I traveled to the UK and appeared on the largest watched show in Britain, The Tonight Show  and told the audience that I was like a Paul Revere in reverse and that there was still time for Britain to avoid the horrible racial violence that plagued America. Enoch Powell did the same thing for years. The people listened,  for the British people have overwhelmingly opposed Third World immigration. However, the politicians didn’t. If they would have listened, that 16 year old schoolgirl would not be in agonizing pain fighting for her life. Ironic isn’t it, how we are the ones to media loves to characterize as evil! Well, I know who the evil ones really are, the ones who caused this and thousands of other atrocities to plague our European nations! – David Duke

Is it any wonder people are fleeing London?
By Jan Moir

In a north London suburb last week, a schoolgirl was beaten, gang-raped and then had drain-cleaning fluid poured on her body apparently to destroy DNA evidence. In the eternal cesspit of senseless urban crime, I feel that a dreadful nadir of sorts has been reached, a benchmark of slaked lust and casual, sadistic cruelty.

Police sources say the 16-year-old will never fully recover from the injuries caused by the caustic soda and, at the time of writing, she remains under heavy sedation in a burns unit, fighting for her life.

One could weep an ocean for this young woman, her life ruined by these savages, who hunted in a pack like animals and dragged her to an empty house, caring nothing for her wellbeing or future.
 
 Drain cleaner? The callous premeditation is shocking, and underlines the fact that some of the rootless delinquents who roam the London streets are now scraping the bottom of the barrel of humanity.

I’m almost embarrassed to say that the attackers have been described as “five black youths”, in case you think I’m being racist in highlighting this crime. (more…)

“…If you started talking about Israel’s terrorist attacks against America you wouldn’t have your job long”"

Excerpts from the Interview

Dr. Duke: …The Zionist radicals have so much power in American media and government that vital truths don’t come out. I will give you another example. You probably are aware of this, but have you heard of the Lavon Affair?

Reporter: No, I don’t think I have.

Dr. Duke: In the 1950s the Israeli Mossad attacked American installations in Egypt with terrorist bombs. They blew up American theaters and American libraries with the attempt to blame the Egyptians for this terrorism so we would go to war against Egypt. This was exposed and the Israeli Minister of Defense, Pinhas Lavon, was forced to resign. Not because he bombed American installations at the service of Israel, but because it didn’t work! What happened was that one of the Israeli agents bombs went off prematurely; he was captured and spilled the beans and all the Israeli terrorist gang members were rounded up. This is all fact. You could look it up, just do a little research. You are a journalist and a well read man, it’s not your fault but you don’t even know what the Lavon Affair is!

Reporter: No.

Dr. Duke: Because it is not in our consciousness. So people don’t know that Israel has committed terrorist acts against the United States. I know you have heard of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty attack, that’s been a little more talked about, but that’s been totally swept under the rug. We had 11 months of hearings in the United States Congress on the sister ship of the Liberty, the Pueblo which was captured by the North Koreans.  But, we had no formal Congressional investigation of the Liberty. Yet the Secretary of State at the time was Dean Rusk as well as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Thomas Moorer, the two men who were in the best position to know if the attack was an accident or an intentional attack, have both said that there is no question at all that the attack was deliberate, that Israel knew exactly what it was doing. They meant to attack this ship, sink it, kill everyone on board, blame the attack on Egypt and use the attack to get us into the war…

Reporter: Right.

Dr. Duke: So Israel makes a surprise terrorist attack on a U.S. ship, kill 34 Americans they wound a 174 Americans and after this attack, does anything stop? No, we send them more weapons! We don’t go bomb them as we say we should do to anyone who commits terrorism against us, no we send them more weapons!… Do you understand my anger against the media? I know that people like you can’t say much about it. If you started talking about Israel’s terrorist attacks against America you wouldn’t have your job long.

Listen to interview in its entirety. Read the distorted article in Gannet chain of newspapers. Learn how the media distorts the truth!

(left) Leonard Zeskind, a typically hypocritical Jewish supremacist who defends Apartheid Israel  (much like the ADL) while at the same time lectures America on the evils of White people defending their heritage and civil rights!

Clarion Ledger Interviews Dr. David Duke about Obama —Publishes Typically Biased Article

Listen here to the actual interview with reporter with the Clarion Ledger!

On Sunday, the Clarion-ledger, part of the far left, pro-Zionist Gannet newspaper chain ran an article titled, “Some white racists favor left, Obama or Nader win would aid supremacist movement, some say.” It was typical distorted reporting that one can come to expect from the mainstream media in America. But, thanks to technology and the web, you can hear the actual interview of Dr. Duke with the reporter. You will see that the taped interview shows a completely different side of David Duke than that which was conveyed in news article. The title is enough to get the flavor of the piece. Racism is defined these days as “hating or wanting to suppress other races.” That is certainly not what the White movement today espouses. Another word used to describe us is “supremacist,” and that is not a term used by any White activists and in fact it does not reflect our views.

European Americans are not seeking supremacy or suppression over others, simply the preservation of their heritage and rights in the nation our own forefathers created. In fact, the biggest threat to America is certainly not White supremacists but the Jewish supremacist extremists who dominate the media and political process of the United States. Note the extraneous quotes in the article about Adolf Hitler thrown in as a device meant to isolate the views of White activists from the millions of White people who are starting to see hat we are losing our country. Adolf Hitler has nothing to do with it! Note too, that the “authority” used to analyze the White response to the election: none other than Leonard Zeskind, a Jewish extremist supporter of the apartheid Jewish State of Israel, while at the same time he criticizes European Americans for simply wanting to preserve the nation our own forefathers created! As we mentioned in a recent article, also consider how Dr. David Duke was introduced as “former Klansman,” not former member of the House of Representatives in Louisiana, and he is certainly not accorded his proper title in the same way the Clarion Ledger refers to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Also be cognizant of the nasty-looking picture of David Duke used, one with him caught in mid-sentence with his mouth distorted. Listen to the actual phone interview of David Duke with the reporter, and you will hear the real position of David Duke, not the distorted images you get in the Clarion-ledger and the “mainstream” newspapers in the U.S. At least with the Internet you have a chance to learn the truth!  If you read the article, be sure to listen to actual interview!

David Duke at the Ufizzi Gallery in Florence appreciating some of the greatest art of European Civilization.  (Right) His favorite: The Birth of Venus by Botticelli

In this current broadcast of August 3, 2008 — Dr. David Duke makes some casual, off the cuff remarks, about some of the major issues facing Europeans and Americans

Dr. David Duke and Lady Michele Renouf: The Struggle for Freedom of Speech

A Fascinating Brand NEW Conversation Between David Duke and Michele Renouf

Barack Obama’s Big Secret Could Ruin 2008 Bid

One of the most powerful voting blocs in the U.S. today—and one which almost unanimously votes Democrat—is concerned about the leanings of Sen. Barack Obama. Does this segment of the population hold the key to 2008?

By Michael Collins Piper — AFP

ALTHOUGH THE MASS MEDIA ballyhooed Barack Obama’s visits to a number of countries, greeted with large, enthusiastic crowds—even in Germany, said to be the bastion of “race hatred” in the 20th Century—the media notably failed to mention that in Israel—America’s “closest ally”—polls have shown John McCain is more popular than Obama. In fact, Israel is the only country in the world where McCain’s popularity outranked that of Obama.

That single fact—a not insignificant one, considering the clout of Israel’s supporters in the U.S. arena— might be described as “the big secret” of the 2008 election that the average voter knows little about.

In contrast, McCain’s popularity in Israel—coupled with serious reservations about Obama among both Israelis and American Jews—has been a staple of reportage in Israel and in American Jewish community journals and on Internet sites aimed at that audience.

Forward—perhaps the most influential Jewish newspaper in America—let the cat out of the bag on July 17, when it revealed:

Polls indicate that Israelis evince some of the lowest levels of support for Obama of any country in the world.

In France and Germany, both stops on Obama’s tour, respectively 65 percent and 67 percent of the population has said that they would vote for him if they could.

By contrast, in Israel . . . only 27 percent of the respondents said that they would like to see him become president, with John McCain being the preferred choice of 36 percent. . . .

Now, although it is being said that Obama’s popularity has risen in Israel since his visit, those claims seem disingenuous, a feeble attempt to show that Israel is “in sync” with the rest of the world, when, in fact, it is not.

The truth is that many Obama supporters have been astounded by the revelation that there has been such a striking contrast between polls in Israel and those in all other countries regarding Obama and McCain.

(more…)

The following quotation is from the Jewish magazine Moment. You can read the entire article at the link below. In the America of today, only Jews are permitted to point out the Jewish control of the single most important factor in elections: money. Jews can also boast, usually only in their own publications, of their incredible dominance of the entertainment and news media. If a European-American such as Dr. David Duke dares to point out how Jewish money and connections in politics and Jewish influence in mass media have had such an unholy influence on things such as the catastrophe of the Iraq War and selling out American interests to Israel, he endures incredible criticism and character assassination. Yet, the Jewish political and media influence is undeniable..

Their influence and their ability to use can be seen in their treatment of our own Dr. David Duke. Note that even though it has been 30 years since David Duke was member of the Klan, every news article that mentions his name introduces him “former Klan leader David Duke,” not as “former Representative David Duke.” Sen. Robert Byrd, a former Klan officer in his youth, is never introduced in a news article as “former Klansman Robert Byrd.” What’s the difference? One big difference is that Byrd doesn’t criticize Jewish extremist influence over American politics and the American media, and like every other U.S. Senator,  he puts Israel’s interest over that of America’s. The late Martin Luther King is almost always identified as Dr. Martin Luther King in media articles. David Duke, although a bona fide PhD, is never identified as Dr. David Duke in the press. Nelson Mandela is canonized daily in the American press although Mandela was a bona fide terrorist who planned and carried out bombings of civilian targets. David Duke never had even an allegation of violence against anyone, and he has always condemned violence in stark contrast to the sainted Mandela, but Mandela is never introduced as “former terrorist bomber, Nelson Mandela.” Jewish extremist influence in media is perfectly illustrated by their treatment of Dr. Duke (who they see as an enemy) as compared to Robert Byrd, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela. This article in Moment shows once again that Jewish Israeli partisans will control the next President of the United States on November 4th, just as they have previous Presidents. Dr. David Duke is the best known political figure in America to point that out, and now you know why he is so attacked by the media. –staff

When Money Grows On Jewish Trees

In the 2008 election cycle, the Jewish “network” has helped raise more money than any other cycle in history

By Benjamin Schuman-Stoler from Moment Magazine

No matter how much they emphasize their differences from one another on the campaign trail, Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama and Republican nominee John McCain share a common denominator: Jewish fundraisers. Penny Pritzker serves as Obama’s national finance chair, and Elliott Broidy is the Republican National Committee finance committee chairman.

Through early June, Pritzker helped bring in more than $265 million for the Obama campaign; the Democratic National Committee collected an additional $80 million. Broidy amassed over $165 million for the RNC, while McCain’s campaign brought in $96 million. These amounts are nothing to scoff at, and they highlight the influence of Jews in American presidential races. For More