Some people may have noticed that mailboxes, which had been in their neighborhoods literally for decades have recently disappeared. Well, it turns out that any mailbox that gets less than 25 pieces of mail per week is in danger of being uprooted.

It’s true people under age 70 overwhelmingly use e-mail for everything, and that people are likely paying their bills online or by some automatic deductions. This means a big drop in mail, but it seems silly to take away mailboxes. Why not just collect mail from them less often? This move seems to be a largely symbolic act by the Feds. Our government isn’t able to repaint a white line on a road without spending thousand of dollars. I would not be surprised one bit if it cost thousands of dollars in labor and bureaucracy to remove each mailbox.

A Reuters article reports “The U.S. Postal Service said on Friday it is closing six of its 80 district offices. In addition, administrative staff positions at district level nationwide are being reduced by 15 percent and nearly 150,000 employees nationwide being given opportunity to take an early retirement. More than 1,400 mail processing supervisor and management positions are also being eliminated.”

Early retirement usually means significantly less pension in most jobs. It also means 150,000 less postal workers, so the long lines at the post office will get even worse.

But far more interesting are the political and financial implications of this little article. At a time when Obama and his Jewish handlers are running the presses creating more and more paper money (along with rampant inflation) and borrowing up to their fetlocks from the Communist Chinese, of all people, and at a time when they are hurling billions of dollars at a time at every bank and every Democrat pork project under the sun, actual human beings are being kicked off the federal payroll.

Now, this is almost a 180-degree contradiction to normal liberal and Democrat principles, which dictate hire, hire, hire, (especially women and minorities) and grow government to gigantic proportions so that they get that many more voters and their families committed to them. Democrats buy their loyalty. A good example is the ghastly National Education Association (NEA), the nationwide teachers’ union that in many places makes direct deductions from teachers’ salaries for the union which exclusively supports Democrats and who are largely credited with forming the ground troops who twice inflicted the unspeakable Clintons on this country.

So why are the Democrats spending hundreds of billions of dollars in an effort to “stimulate” the economy while cutting the existing federal workforce? It used to be you had to be caught committing an unnatural act with a llama in the city zoo in order to be fired from the Post Office, and even then the pervert might still keep his job. Now they’re dumping 150,000 postal workers?

No, really, why are they doing this? The cost of these people’s salaries is tiny compared to the 787 billion dollar “stimulus” plan and the multi-trillion-dollar budget. What’s going on here? Simple incompetence? If the Feds want to create jobs for people why not start with KEEPING the existing jobs? I suspect we’ll see a lot more bizarre confusing moves in the near future because –despite all the hype– Obama really isn’t that bright and he’s never run anything before. He’s just another Democrat politician from the most corrupt political machine in the world (Chicago). We expect to see patronage and corruption, but maybe we should expect to see blundering and and mismanagement too.

The Purim Celebration of Hate

Purim II: Promotion of Genocide”

Hollywood Basterds by David Duke

Do Jews Control the Media? — The LA Times Says Yes!

Shoe Bombers, crotch bombers, 9/11 and Israel

The Zionist Matrix of Power in America

The Zionist Red Army by David Duke

Stop the Genocide of European Mankind by David Duke

David Duke a Tribute to European Women

David Duke “Heart to Heart” Part 1

David Duke “Heart to Heart” Part 2

Hanukkah Hypocrisy by David Duke Part 1

Hanukkah Hypocrisy by David Duke Part 2

Holocaust Survivor Redefines AntiSemitism by David Duke

The War on Christmas!

War is Good – Obama Nobel Peace Prize Speech

From Don Black

We’ve finalized arrangements for Stormfront’s Renaissance Man, Derek Black (Theodoric) to broadcast a twice weekly program on our local West Palm Beach radio station WPBR 1340AM. The programs can also be heard through the station’s audio/video webstream.

Derek became a local celebrity after media coverage of his election to the Republican Executive Committee, with REC chairman Sid Dinerstein then decreeing elections don’t count and voters don’t matter, if he and his fellow commissars don’t like the result. We have since prepared a lawsuit, which his attorney expects to win.

Derek formerly hosted four one-hour weekly shows on Stormfront Radio, so he has experience. This is a broadcast news/talk radio station, however, with a significant local audience.

Derek’s working hard to make the first show memorable, with several prominent guests. He will also be accepting call-ins from listeners at (561) 533-6134. The programs will air live each Tuesday and Thursday, 9:00 to 11:00 AM ET. A live audio/video stream is available through the station’s website along with an audio only stream. The programs will also be archived online as podcasts afterward:

Derek Black News/Talk Radio 3-11-2010 44 kHz, 16 kHz
Special guests Don Black, Truck Roy, Old Timey Niece, Tom Oldman & Sid Whinerstein

Derek Black News/Talk Radio 3-09-2010 44 kHz, 16 kHz
Special guests Don Black, Truck Roy, Sid Whinerstein & Texe Marrs

Derek Black News/Talk Radio 3-04-2010 MP3, Stream
Special guests Don Black, caller David, Rep. James Traficant & caller Bob

Derek Black News/Talk Radio 3-02-2010 44 kHz, 16 kHz
Special guests Don Black, Truck Roy, Dr. David Duke & caller Harry

Derek Black News/Talk Radio 2-25-2010 44 kHz, 16 kHz
Special guests Don Black, Old Timey Niece, Truck Roy, Dennis Morris and Jack Boot

Derek Black News/Talk Radio 2-23-2010 MP3
Special guests Don Black, Truck Roy & Sam Dickson

Derek Black News/Talk Radio 2-18-2010 MP3, Stream
Special guests Don Black, Jared Taylor & Paul Fromm

Derek Black News/Talk Radio 2-16-2010 MP3, Stream
Special guests Don Black, Jared Taylor, Hungarian George & Dr. David Duke

Derek Black News/Talk Radio 2-11-2010 MP3, Stream
Special guests Dr. David Duke & Truck Roy

Derek Black News/Talk Radio 2-09-2010 MP3, Stream
Special guests Gordon Lee Baum, James Edwards & Don Black

 
How you can help support SF-Radio’s outreach efforts HERE.

 
Article Source: Derek Black Show Thread

By Anchorage Activist

As one European free speech martyr, Ernst Zundel, is released from prison, another one takes his place in the EU gulag. A Spanish court has sentenced Barcelona bookshop owner Pedro Varela to two years and nine months in prison for “spreading racist propaganda.” The court ruled that Varela spread ideas “favorable to genocide.” In fact none of the books Varela sold were favorable in any way to genocide. Varela has always condemned all human rights violations against peoples. He was charged with “racism” for simply selling a book in his bookstore by a leading British scientist on racial differences. A book which advocated no repression or harm against anyone. He was also ordered to pay a fine of 2,880 euros (3,945 dollars). Prosecutors had asked for a four-year prison sentence.

The court rejected Varela’s defense that he belonged to no political party and that there were no banned books in Spain. During the trial, Varela said “I am not saying there was not persecution of the Jews, and I have always condemned forcefully any persecution that existed, but there should be traditional academic investigation, criticism and challenge on historical events.” Brief English summary from EarthTimes; Spanish-language media reports from El Pais and EFE. So, they seek to throw him in prison not for denying crimes against Jews in the Second World War but for simply selling books in his shop that historically argue numbers of which there is considerable dispute even among mainstream Jewish researchers.

This represents Pedro Varela’s third time through the Spanish justice system over free speech issues. In 2006, Varela was arrested on Holocaust denial and justification of genocide charges, convicted on the justification charge, and sentenced to seven months in prison after a 2008 trial, but avoided incarceration at the time because he lacked a prior criminal record. Previously, on November 16th, 1998, a Barcelona criminal court found Varela guilty of inciting racial hatred and of denying or justifying genocide, and sentenced him to five years imprisonment and a fine of 720,000 pesetas (about $5,000). The conviction was suspended by the Catalonia Provincial Court on April 30th, 1999 when the three judges of the Audencia court in Barcelona unanimously declared that the law under which he had been convicted may have violated Article 20 of the Spanish Constitution, which guarantees the rights of free speech and free expression of opinion.

Ultimately, a Constitutional Tribunal sided with the provincial court, deciding in 2007 to decriminalise a presumption that was included in the reform of the Penal Code of 1996. Article 607.2 anticipates punishments of up to two years in jail for whoever, “by any means” diffuses “ideas or doctrines that deny or justify” the Holocaust. The Tribunal found that this clause limited a fundamental right, the right to freedom of expression, since it punished the diffusion of ideas “without demanding any other element, such as affronts, or inciting to attack groups.”

In 2007, Pedro Varela published Dr. David Duke’s Spanish-language translation of his book, “Jewish Supremacism”. The two launched a joint book tour for Dr. Duke. The November 2007 Spanish news video embedded below shows one of the joint appearances of Dr. Duke and Pedro Varela — and also shows Spanish Marxists staging a riot in protest. Ironically, a nonviolent man who has harmed no one is facing almost three years in prison while communist terrorists who rioted, burned property, who physically harmed police and bystanders, who sought bodily harm against other humans simply because of their viewpoint — were let off with only a slap on the wrist!

Wikipedia provides a list of Holocaust denial laws by country HERE.

 
Hear Pedro Varela Interviewed by David Duke 3/21/2005!

 
Also read Dr. Duke’s powerful commentary on Pedro’s arrest in 2006:

 
A staunch and courageous Pedro Varela shown handcuffed and taken away by Spanish Thought Police! What was his crime? Publishing or just selling books with a politically incorrect opinion, that’s what. In a Spain where sick pornographers are free to publish videos of films of unspeakably degraded women, you cannot publish a book that dares to expose the extremist, Jewish supremacists who push for war with Iran and support the Israeli criminal state! Police say they confiscated 5000 books. That’s B O O K S, my friends, not bombs, and they are books that don’t condone any violence or terrorism such as the popular Hollywood film, V is for Vendetta.

News Flash — Pedro Varela Arrested in Spain

Notice the picture of the arrest of my good friend, Spanish patriot Pedro Varela. Who more resembles a criminal or terrorist, Pedro Varela or the Secret Police arresting him? And what was Pedro’s crime? Publishing books with a revisionist view of the Second World War and critical of Zionist policies in Israel and elsewhere. What were the dangerous items confiscated by the police? Books. In essence, he is being arrested for expressing opinion and/or enabling others to publish their opinion in a non-violent, intelligent fashion. What are the powerful weapons for which they want to lock him in jail? Ideas.

Ladies and Gentlemen, where is the international protest against this violation of the most basic of human rights? Where is Amnesty International, and for that matter where is George Bush and all his talk about freedom and right to people to free speech and expression? Isn’t that now the supposed motivation of the Iraq War , freedom!

Why must the Jewish supremacists seek such suppression and draconian tactics? Could it be that they have no answer to Pedro Varela’s elegant arguments and reason and thus must try to intimidate, harm and hurt this well spoken philosopher and writer? What you see in the photo is the real picture of terrorism, the state kidnapping and imprisoning a citizen for daring to publish politically incorrect books. Thought police rounding up books as you would see in some science fiction novel or in artistic renditions of totalitarian states.

Make no mistake about it my friends in America and across the world. We are in a worldwide battle for freedom. Our enemies don’t any longer even pretend to believe in free speech when it comes to those who challenge their power. And that power now leads directly to the human and worldwide catastrophe of the Iran War!

As the effort for this new War for Israel ramps up you will see more and more suppression of our most important human rights!

David Irving, Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, Jurgen Graf, and now Pedro Varela. We are in a war for freedom my friends, a war for the truth.

Please contact the Spanish Embassy and Consulates all over America and wherever you are in the world to this terrible violation of freedom of thought, conscience, and speech. Let Spain know how millions of people will look on Spain if Mr. Varela is not given his freedom –David Duke
http://www.davidduke.com/index.php?s=Varela&submit=go

 
Article Source: White Reference

U.S. Can’t Afford Military Aid to Israel

By Josh Ruebner

In his recent State of the Union address, President Obama pledged to “go through the budget line by line to eliminate programs that we can’t afford and don’t work.” One week later, he sent his FY2011 budget request to Congress, which included a record-breaking $3 billion in military aid to Israel.

This requested increase in U.S. weapons to Israel — part of a ten-year $30 billion agreement signed between the two countries in 2007 — qualifies on both counts as a program that the United States can’t afford and that doesn’t work in establishing a just and lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians.

Data published recently by the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation shows that U.S. military aid to Israel comes at a financial and moral price that this country cannot afford to pay. Its website reveals that this same $3 billion earmark for Israel could be used instead to provide more than 364,000 low-income households with affordable housing vouchers, or to retrain 498,000 workers for green jobs, or to provide early reading programs to 887,000 at-risk students, or to provide access to primary health care services for more than 24 million uninsured Americans.

If U.S. weapons were going to Israel for a good purpose, then perhaps a coherent guns versus butter debate would be appropriate. However, Israel repeatedly misuses U.S. weapons to commit grave human rights abuses against Palestinians who are forced to live under its illegal 42-year military occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza Strip.

During the Bush Administration, Israel killed at least 3,107 innocent Palestinian civilians, according to the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem. Israel also injured thousands more innocent Palestinians and destroyed billions of dollars of Palestinian civilian infrastructure including homes, schools, factories, government buildings, and even Palestine’s only airport. The severity and scale of this killing and destruction were made possible by hi-tech U.S. weapons provided to Israel at taxpayer expense.

And during Obama’s first year in office, Israel continued to misuse its stock of U.S. weapons to entrench its apartheid policies toward Palestinians by maintaining its illegal blockade of the Gaza Strip — collectively punishing its 1.5 million Palestinian residents by severely restricting the flow of humanitarian relief — and building illegal Israeli-only colonies on stolen Palestinian land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

It was exactly to prevent this kind of misuse of U.S. weapons that Congress passed the Arms Export Control Act, which strictly limits foreign countries from employing U.S. weapons for any purpose other than “internal security” or “legitimate self-defense.” Building apartheid walls and colonies to maintain a foreign military occupation, enforcing a medieval blockade, and killing and injuring innocent civilians by the thousands certainly cannot be considered legitimate and is self-evidently not for domestic security.

Yet despite this clear misuse of U.S. weapons by Israel — most evident recently during its December 2008-January 2009 attack on the Gaza Strip which killed more than 1,300 Palestinians in just three weeks — both Congress and the Obama Administration have failed miserably to hold Israel accountable for its violations of the Arms Export Control Act and cut off weapons flows to it as required by the law.

A few lonely voices on Capitol Hill — such as Rep. Brian Baird, Rep. Keith Ellison, and Rep. Dennis Kucinich — have spoken up bravely and truthfully about the consequences of U.S. weapons transferred to Israel, which a 2009 Amnesty International report cited as literally “fuelling” the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Unfortunately, President Obama has paid no heed to these Members of Congress. When questioned at a recent town hall meeting in Tampa about the impact of U.S. military aid to Israel on Palestinian civilians, the normally articulate Obama appeared visibly flummoxed before sputtering, “Look, look, look, the Middle East is obviously an issue that has plagued the region for centuries.” He then proceeded to duck the question with platitudes about peace.

The President’s non-response to the question demonstrates that politicians prefer to turn a blind eye to the obvious incompatibility of trying to promote Israeli-Palestinian peace while giving Israel the weapons it needs to maintain its illegal occupation of Palestinian lands.

Before Congress gets to work on the President’s budget request and considers transferring an additional $3 billion in weapons to Israel, it is long past overdue for the United States to reconsider whether we can afford this policy any longer.

 
Article Source: IMEU.net

How Israel lobby Controls US

‘42% of the largest political donors to the 2000 election cycle were Jewish, including four of the top five. That compares to less than 2% of Americans who are Jewish’

By Jeff Gates

In the early 1960s, Senator William J. Fulbright fought to force the American Zionist Council to register as agents of a foreign government. The Council eluded registration by reorganizing as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. AIPAC has since become what Fulbright most feared: a foreign agent dominating American foreign policy while disguised as a domestic lobby.

Israelis and pro-Israelis object when they hear that charge. How, they ask, can we so few wield such influence over so many? Answer: it’s all in the math. And in the single-issue advocacy brought to bear on U.S. policy-making by dozens of ‘domestic’ organizations that now compose the Israel lobby, with AIPAC its most visible force.

The political math was enabled by Senator John McCain whose support for all things Israeli ensured him the GOP nomination to succeed Christian-Zionist G.W. Bush. McCain’s style of campaign finance reform proved a perfect fit for the Diaspora-based fundraising on which the lobby relies. Co-sponsored by Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, this change in federal election law typifies how Israeli influence became systemic.

‘McCain-Feingold’ raised the amount (from $1,000 to $2,300) that candidates can receive from individuals in primary and general elections. A couple can now contribute a combined $9,200 to federal candidates: $4,600 in each of the primary and general elections. Primary elections, usually low-budget, are particularly easy to sway.

Importantly for the Diaspora, this change also doubled the funds candidates can receive without regard to where those contributors reside. A candidate in Iowa, say, may have only a few pro-Israeli constituents. When campaign support is provided by a nationwide network of pro-Israelis, that candidate can more easily be persuaded to support policies sought by Tel Aviv.

Diaspora-based fundraising has long been used by the lobby with force-multiplying success to shape U.S. foreign policy. Under the guise of reform, John McCain doubled the financial resources that the lobby can deploy to elect and retain its supporters.

Fulbright was Right

The influence-peddling process works like this. Candidates are summoned for in-depth AIPAC interviews. Those found sufficiently committed to Israel’s agenda are provided a list of donors likely to “max out” their campaign contributions. Or the process can be made even easier when AIPAC-approved candidates are given the name of a “bundler.”

Bundlers raise funds from the Diaspora and bundle those contributions to present them to the candidate. No quid pro quo need be mentioned. After McCain-Feingold became law in 2003, AIPAC-identified bundlers could raise $1 million-plus for AIPAC-approved candidates simply by contacting ten like-minded supporters. Here’s the math:

The bundler and spouse “max out” for $9,200 and call ten others, say in Manhattan, Miami, and Beverly Hills. Each of them max out (10 x $9,200) and call ten others for a total of 11. [111 x $9,200 = $1,021,200.]

Imagine the incentive to do well in the AIPAC interview. One call from the lobby and a candidate can collect enough cash to mount a credible campaign in most Congressional districts. From Tel Aviv’s perspective, that political leverage is leveraged yet again because fewer than ten percent of the 435 House races are competitive in any election cycle (typically 35 to 50).

Additional force-multipliers come from: (a) sustaining this financial focus over multiple cycles, (b) using funds to gain and retain seniority for those serving on Congressional committees key to promoting Israeli goals, and (c) opposing candidates who question those goals.

Jewish Achievement reports that 42% of the largest political donors to the 2000 election cycle were Jewish, including four of the top five. That compares to less than 2% of Americans who are Jewish. Of the Forbes 400 richest Americans, 25% are Jewish according to Michael Steinhardt, a key funder of the Democratic Leadership Council. The DLC was led by Jewish Zionist Senator Joe Lieberman when he resigned in 2000 to run as vice president with pro-Israeli presidential candidate Al Gore.

Money was never a constraint. Pro-Israeli donors were limited only by how much they could lawfully contribute to AIPAC-screened candidates. McCain-Feingold raised a key limit. The full impact of this foreign influence has yet to be tallied. What’s known, however, is sufficient to apply the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Of the top 50 neoconservatives who advocated war in Iraq, 26 were Jewish (52%).

Harry Truman, a Christian Zionist, remains one of the more notable recipients of funds. In 1948, he was trailing badly in the polls and in fundraising. His prospects brightened dramatically in May after he recognized as a legitimate state an enclave of Jewish extremists who originally planned to settle in Argentina before putting their sights on Palestine.

That recognition was opposed by Secretary of State George C. Marshall, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the bulk of the diplomatic corps, the fledgling Central Intelligence Agency and numerous distinguished Americans, including moderate and secular Jews concerned at the troubles that were certain to follow. Not until 1984 was it revealed that a network of Jewish Zionists had funded Truman’s campaign by financially refueling his whistle-stop campaign train with $400,000 in cash ($3 million in 2009 dollars).

To buy time on the public’s airwaves, money raised from the Israel lobby’s network is paid to media outlets largely owned or managed by members of the same network. Presidents, Senators and Congressmen come and go but those who collect the checks rack up the favors that amass lasting political influence.

The U.S. system of government is meant to ensure that members of the House represent the concerns of Americans who reside in Congressional districts—not a nationally dispersed network (a Diaspora) committed to advancing the agenda of a foreign nation. Federal elections are meant to hold Senators accountable to constituents who reside in the states they represent—not out-of-state residents or a foreign government.

In practical effect, McCain-Feingold hastened a retreat from representative government by granting a nationwide network of foreign agents disproportionate influence over elections in every state and Congressional district. Campaign finance ‘reform’ enabled this network to amass even more political clout—wielding influence disproportionate to their numbers, indifferent to their place of residence and often contrary to America’s interests.

This force-multiplier is now wielded in plain sight, with impunity and under cover of free speech, free elections, free press and even the freedom of religion. Therein lies the perils of an entangled alliance that induced the U.S. to invade Iraq and now seeks war with Iran. By allowing foreign agents to operate as a domestic lobby, the U.S. was induced to confuse Zionist interests with its own.

* Jeff Gates is a widely acclaimed author, attorney, investment banker, educator and consultant to government, corporate and union leaders worldwide; an adviser to policy-makers worldwide; former counsel to the U.S. Senate Finance Committee; and author of numerous articles and books including his latest book Guilt by Association: How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War, Democracy at Risk and The Ownership Solution.

 
Article Source: Criminalstate.com

Left: President Obama in the White House with Chabad Lubavitch leader Levi Shemtov. As documented below, Chabad is a Jewish extremist organization that literally believes that the purpose of all Gentiles is to “serve Jews” and that Gentiles are inferior and have in fact “satanic souls.” Do a Google Search and read about one of Chabad’s leading rabbis, Yitzhak Ginsburgh who recently endorsed a book in Israel calling for the murder of Gentile babies who hold a “potential threat for Israel.” Also documented below is a statement by Ginsburgh in Jewish Week where he says it is moral for a Jew to kill a Gentile and steal his liver because Jewish life has “infinite value” as compared to “inferior” Gentiles. All this is well documented and proven, so why no outrage at the close relationship of  the President of the United States to this extremist Jewish hate group, and why does the national and international media cover up what should be a scandal of huge proportions?  This embargo of truth about Jewish extremism shows you who really is in control of politics and media — doesn’t it?  Why is Dr. Duke called an anti-Semite for exposing this Jewish extremist influence in the highest levels of government, yet no major media will dare to expose the most powerful and influential hate group in the world and its close relationship with governments across the world? –Staff

Here is my updated Author’s Preface to Jewish Supremacism. Notice the powerful new references and exposure of Chabad Lubavitch. The fact that this Jewish extremist, hate organization can not only escape mainstream criticism, but in fact be praised and commended by almost every major political leader of the West reveals the radical Jewish influence on both our media and government. In America and the whole world, no book is doing more to awaken people about the danger of Jewish extremism than this book. It is now back in print, and I will be happy to autograph all orders, and remember that we offer a discount and discounted airmail shipping to America and most of the world! — Thanks,  David Duke

David Duke’s Preface to Jewish Supremacism — latest edition

I promise that this book will challenge you. Its amazing documentary evidence will confront some of your most cherished beliefs.

If you can put aside, as best you can, the prejudices you may have on this subject and even preconceptions you might have about me personally, you can more fairly evaluate the ideas and evidence in this book. That is all an author can ask of his reader, and I ask it of you. It is my earnest belief that if you endeavor to keep an open mind, what you read will surprise you.

The real power of this book comes from its documentation from major sources. In fact, you will quickly discover that most of my documents about Jewish supremacism and international Zionism are from Jewish sources. They argue more convincingly for my point of view than anything I could write. I encourage you to go to the sources that I quote and check them out for yourself. In this book, I take you with me on a fascinating journey of discovery in a forbidden subject. I urge you: courageously keep an open mind while you explore the topics ahead. That is the only way any of us can find the truth.

Some will defame this book by calling it anti-Semitic. Yet, it is not considered anti-American to examine historical mistreatment of American Indians. No one calls it anti-Christian to talk about the excesses of the Inquisition. Is one considered anti-White for documenting the history of Jim Crow in the South? The mass media are filled with stories about the dangers of Muslim extremism. No one says that it is anti-Muslim to examine extreme elements of Muslim fundamentalism. This book dares to examine a forbidden topic: Jewish extremism.

This book is not anti-Semitic; it simply examines and documents the powerful extremist elements of ethnic supremacism that have existed in the Jewish community from historical to modern times. This book will prove, and it will do so by mostly Jewish sources, the existence of Jewish supremacist elements in many of the highest echelons of government, media and financial power. Because anyone who addresses this subject is slandered as an “anti-Semite” it is vital that I repeat emphatically that this book has is not against all Jews; it pertains only to Jewish extremists. I have much respect for individual Jews; this volume is in fact dedicated to a Jew: the late Israel Shahak.

As an introductory glimpse into Jewish supremacism, I can point to the close relationship of the White House of the United States with a very powerful, extremist Jewish organization, Chabad Lubavitch.

What is Chabad Lubavitch? It is worldwide, ultra-orthodox Jewish extremist organization with members in every leading nation of the world. If you are not familiar with the organization, its racial supremacism will shock you.

Chabad Lubavitch teaches that Gentiles are unclean, inferior creatures whose sole purpose on the earth is to serve Jews. Various Chabad rabbis maintain that Jews are literally the DNA of God, while Gentiles are the “supernal refuse of creation.[1]” They often teach that it is no sin, and is in fact righteous, to kill or cheat a Gentile. Some readers may not want to believe this, but any quick research on the Internet to official Chabad sites and the writings of numerous Chabad rabbis will bear out every word that I say. You will find that everything in Jewish Supremacism is thoroughly documented and referenced.

Chabad and other extremist orthodox rabbis frequently author columns in the largest Jewish newspaper in the United States, Jewish Week. In this paper you will find supremacist attitudes that any decent human being would call horrific. Examine the following quote:

As for the goyim…Zalman’s attitude (was): “Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.” …If every simple cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part of God, then every strand of DNA is a part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA. …

If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value,” he explained. “There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life. – Chabad Lubavitch Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh in Jewish Week, the largest Jewish publication in the United States.

This Statement was made by a leading Lubavitch Rabbi named Yitshak Ginsburgh and it can be found in the April 26, 1996 Jewish Week. Many Christians would doubt the authenticity of the quote simply because they could not believe any religious leader would actually say that it would be moral for a Jew to kill a Gentile and take his liver. In many of my lectures, I bring home the horror of what Rabbi Ginsburgh said by pointing out to the non-Jews in the audience that he argues that Jews have the moral right to murder your mother or father, son or daughter, husband or wife to provide a liver for a Jew. The evil of such a statement is simply beyond the comprehension of most of us, but again, this statement was made in largest, most popular Jewish publication in the United States.

For simply quoting Ginsburgh and exposing Jewish supremacism in my writings and lectures I have been condemned as a hater, anti-Semite and a bigot. I must endure this treatment by the media while Ginsburgh himself has received hardly a whiff of criticism. His statement was not one of a lone extremist Jew off somewhere in a remote desert of Israel, but was made by one of the honored leaders of a sect that actually has parties and conferences in the White House.

The New Republic in a May 4, 1992 article revealed the hateful anti-Gentile nature of Chabad Lubavitch.

…there are some powerful ironies in Chabad’s new messianic universalism, in its mission to the gentiles; and surely the most unpleasant of them concerns Chabad’s otherwise undisguised and even racial contempt for the goyim.

…Moreover, this characterization of gentiles as being inherently evil, as being spiritually as well as biologically inferior to Jews, has not in any way been revised in later Chabad writing. (The New Republic)[2]

The “Great Rebbe” is the spiritual leader of Chabad. He was late Rabbi Menachem Schneerson many Jews worship like a Messiah. Chabad claims that Rabbi Schneerson never committed a sin in his entire life, and they gathered by the thousands at his gravesite expecting him to rise from the dead. What did Rabbi Schneerson say about Gentiles?

The following quotes are taken from a book of his recorded messages to followers in Israel, titled Gatherings of Conversations and published in Israel in 1965. During the subsequent three decades of his life until his death, Rabbi Schneerson remained consistent; he did not change any of the opinions. What Rabbi Schneerson taught became official, Lubavitch-Hassidic doctrine. Regarding the non-Jew the Lubovitcher Rebbe’s views were clear:

The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: “Let us differentiate.” Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of “let us differentiate” between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world …

…An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.

We therefore ask: Why should a non-Jew be punished if he kills even a non-Jewish embryo while a Jew should not be punished even if he kills a Jewish embryo? The answer can be understood by [considering] the general difference between Jews and non-Jews: A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews.”[3]

Only a few courageous Jews have fought against the Jewish supremacism and anti-Gentile racial hatred of Chabad Lubavitch. One is Dr. Michael Samuel, a former professor of Judaic studies. Here is an excerpt of a letter he sent about Government funding of a Chabad center in Montreal, Canada:

My name is Michael Samuel. I am a former professor in the Judaic studies department of Concordia University, Montreal, and I have a question for you:

What would you do if a racist cult tried to build its headquarters in your neighborhood? What if the cult targeted specifically young people, teaching them that all Christians and Muslims are:

1. evil, satanic creatures from birth (making all Gentile babies “little demons”)

2. no better than worms

3. not really living beings at all, but already “dead”

4. all to be forcibly converted or subjugated by the “Messiah”

5. and that it is their sacred duty to hasten the arrival of this “Messiah” in order to accomplish the forcible conversion or subjugation of non-Jews as soon as possible.

These are just some of the racist teachings of the fanatical messianic cult named “Chabad Lubavitch.” This cult, masquerading as “authentic Judaism,” has been promised nearly one million dollars in funding by the government of Premier Lucien Bouchard of Quebec in order to build its new religious and “outreach” (missionary) complex in Cote St. Luc, Montreal.

Why should you care? Because Chabad Lubavitch is not just our problem, it may be yours as well. It is an extremely powerful, worldwide organization. Its power has until now intimidated the media, who are afraid to expose the evidence of racism produced here to the public, lest they be accused of anti-Semitism. We desperately need your help in breaking this media blackout. …[4]

Dr. Samuel failed in his efforts to stop the funding of the Chabad Lubavitch center in Montreal. Canada has imprisoned citizens for the “hate crime” of simply criticizing Jewish extremism, but gave this Jewish extremist sect that spouts vicious anti-Gentile hate $800,000 of Canadian tax money. Chabad’s influence goes much further than simply getting tax money; they have an inside track to the most powerful political leaders in the world.

The photos show the head of White House policy, Joshua Bolten, as well as President Bush, with rabbis of this extreme Jewish organization, Chabad Lubavitch. The White House regularly invites Chabad rabbis for its celebrations, and even allows them in to teach the many Jewish activists who work there. Chabad Lubavitch rabbis often give the prayer at formal White House Cabinet meetings.

You will look in vain in the popular mass media or in political circles for any serious condemnation of Jewish supremacism. In fact, George Bush actually issued a statement on June 27, 2006 honoring the memory of the Great Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Every U.S. President since Rabbi Schneerson’s death has honored this extreme Jewish supremacist. Here is a direct quote from the Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA) reporting on the honoring of Rabbi Schneerson and showing their influence on American policy.

White House to Chabad: Bush won’t press Israel

The Bush administration will not force Israel into unilateral concessions, top White House officials told representatives of the Lubavitch movement.

Chabad Lubavitch culminated a two-day commemoration of the 12th anniversary of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson’s death with meetings Wednesday with Michael Chertoff, the Homeland Security secretary, and Joshua Bolten, the White House chief of staff. Both men are Jewish.

Bolten and other White House officials assured Chabad representatives that President Bush would never force Israel to concede territory to the Palestinians without a quid pro quo, participants said. Bolten said Bush would follow Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s lead in deciding what concessions to support[5]

If space permitted, I could show pictures of Chabad leaders with every president since Richard Nixon. I could show pictures of Chabad leaders with President Mitterrand of France, Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, President Victor Yushchenko of Ukraine and even President Putin of Russia.

It is not just the bearded extremists of Chabad that have such supremacist sentiments, many of the publicly acknowledged, most influential Jews of the United States. A perfect example is Stephen Steinlight. He served for five years as the Director of National Affairs for the largest and most powerful Jewish organization in the United States, the American Jewish Committee. He made the following remarks in an article on immigration in a national Jewish magazine in October of 2001:

I’ll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one. …[6]

If any Gentile politician dared to say that “typical Jewish kids” are deliberately taught that their real loyalty is not to America but to Israel; and that Jews say they are superior to Gentiles in intelligence and morals, he would be mercilessly condemned by the media and hounded out of politics as an anti-Semite. Yet, this stark admission is by the former head of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee. It should be emphasized that Steinlight’s words are not from an off-handed or careless conversation, but are his carefully chosen words from a major article he wrote for Jewish consumption, called “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demographics.”

If this leading American Jew is accurate, a real threat exists to the United States. For if “typical Jews of his generation” are indeed loyal to Israel over the nations in which they live, is there not a danger that they could use their influence in media and government to serve the Zionist agenda? This book will show how powerful Jewish supremacists have used their influence to steer America into a Mideast policy catastrophic to American interests. Israeli-centric Middle East policies have led America to suffer the horrific terrorism of 9/11.

This volume will show that they have led us to the carnage and disaster of the Iraq War — a war that has led to 500,000 Iraqi dead, and has cost tens of thousands of American wounded or dead, untold billions of dollars, and hurt American interests all over the world. Does anyone still not know that this war was a war for Israel not America?

Any Gentile politician who would claim that some powerful Jews are disloyal to the nation in which they dwell; and that they are more loyal to Israel and the Jewish agenda, would clearly face career suicide. And what would be the reaction to George Bush or any White leader who said that he believed the White race to be superior? Yet, for some reason Steinlight’s account of naked Jewish supremacism received not a word of attention in the media or political establishment.

Any criticism of Jewish extremism is immediately condemned as “anti-Semitism.” The chronic media recital of the horrors of the Holocaust has made the term “anti-Semitic” morally equivalent to the endorsement of mass murder. The word itself shuts down reason and evokes heat rather than light. The word is flagrantly overused; it is even used against those who simply protest Israeli human rights violations against Palestinians.

I am reluctant to begin my book by saying what it is not. The media climate, however, forces me to do so.

Due to the overwhelming power of the media to distort what I say and write, I state emphatically here and now that I do not oppose all Jews, any more than an author examining the excesses of the Inquisition opposes all Christians. Specifically, Jewish Supremacism examines a long record of Jewish supremacist ideology and history that has had a powerful and damaging effect on both the Jewish and Gentile world.

I will be the first to acknowledge that not all Jews support or share in this supremacism. In fact, a number of courageous Jews have suffered greatly for opposing it. One of them: an Israeli professor, Dr. Israel Shahak, was a professor at Hebrew University. He offered strong evidence that Jewish radicals have waged an unrelenting ethnic war against Gentiles since the days of their sojourn in Egypt. Dr. Shahak believed that this extreme chauvinism has helped bring about centuries of repeated anti-Semitic reactions, ranging from the pogroms of Pharaoh to the horrors of what is now called the Holocaust. He persuasively argued that unless both Jews and Gentiles courageously stand up against this supremacist agenda and its power, it will continue to pose a severe danger to Jews and Gentiles alike.[7]

Not only will this book show the existence a Jewish supremacist ideology, it will demonstrate that those who embrace this ideology wield immense power in media, government and world finance. They are powerful enough in the early years of the twentieth century to have sent American servicemen to be maimed or die by the tens of thousands in the Iraq War, a war based on the “weapons of mass destruction lie and other lies that they promoted practically unchallenged in their media. The war was certainly against every true interest of the United States of America. Now, they plan new wars and new catastrophes for America and for the world.

This book is ultimately about lessening both the dangers and the hatreds between our peoples. This cannot happen until both Jews and Gentiles hear the other side of the Jewish Question, a point of view currently forbidden in the modern world.

_____________________________

As I write the lines of this preface, I sit on a mountain in the Colorado Rockies named after the aspen tree, whose shade I now enjoy. Its cylindrical leaves turn easily in the cool breeze, reflecting the sunlight and affording me a magical image. Through those glittering leaves I can see snow capped peaks on the horizon. The sight pleases both my eyes and my soul. From this mystic place, I cannot see a single human being; only the magnificence of Nature fills my eyes. Questions of politics, culture, religion, nationalities, ethnicity and race seem far away from here. From this vantage point, the world and even Nature herself appear serene. Yet, when I look closely at the scenic beauty of Nature, I can see conflict and war that far eclipses even the worst turmoil found in mankind.

Here on this mountain a never-ending struggle rages of element against element and species against species. The wind, rain and snow will someday level these great mountains of rock. Even the flowing stream, the ultimate symbol of serenity for many people, violently fights for its life of movement against the mountain. Indeed, in time this great mountain will eventually succumb to even the tiniest rivulets of water and the other erosions of Nature.

As I write in my notebook, two ants approach a peach pit on the rock beside me. One ant is larger and very differently equipped than the other. He has his way over the smaller one, but the vanquished creature runs back to his kingdom to report the great store of sweet food. His relatives will seek to return to the treasure before their competitors. The two tiny breeds might even go to war over the morsel. My eyes open to the war waged all around me.

On this mountain, the trees, bushes and grasses compete for the sunlight and life itself. Smaller birds keep wary eyes out for hawks. The flora and fauna face the danger of death from the insects and parasites seeking to consume them. Even within every life form, a microscopic war rages. The more closely one looks, the more intense the battle. In one cubic meter of rich soil there are more living creatures injured, killed, eaten or even exploited and enslaved than all the numbers of human beings on earth who have faced a similar fate. Biologists could offer endless examples of the never-ending battle for life and dominance between life forms, enough to fill a million books the size of this one.

Yet, oddly, it is this brutal struggle of survival waged over a billion years that produced the serene beauty that so touches my heart as I look out from this high place. So, perhaps this mountain is not so unlike the eternal battles among humankind. The historical struggle among human races has played a powerful role in our human evolution just as it has for all life forms throughout the natural world. Its result for humanity is no less breathtaking than the view from this mountain. It produced a higher humanity that has given us the art of DaVinci’s Madonna and Child, the ultimate expressions of sublime love found in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet or Keats’ Ode on a Grecian Urn.

The eternal struggle created the evolutionary advances that enabled our kind to put our footprints on the moon. It is still hard to grasp that human beings have walked on another world and actually traveled to the golden orb of light that mankind has gazed up at with wonder for millennia. Could these things have been achieved without the evolutionary struggle for life and dominance that has driven us upward? An argument can surely be made that it is this life and death struggle for evolutionary fitness that produced the beautiful and ultimate forms of love and achievement that in turn give us meaning. This struggle created the beauty in mankind and the glory of its creations, just as a seemingly cruel Nature created the stark splendor seen on this mountain I love.

So perhaps, up here surrounded by a magnificent portrait of Nature, I am not in a world very far removed from the human conflicts down below. Most people see the seemingly serene vistas of Nature and never guess the war that rages underneath its aesthetic canopy. There are also those who are unaware of the racial and ethnic wars boiling both on and under the surface of humanity.

I seek to lessen the hatreds between mankind and offer a vision of every people having the right to preserve their heritage and their freedom. You cannot work to end a war, if you don’t even acknowledge that it exists. This book is about an ethnic war being raged for 3,000 years being waged by one extremist group against the rest of humanity.

Although we fantasize about the peace-loving nature of human beings, most of human history is a record of tribal, ethnic or racial war of one kind or another. For instance, the most read book on earth, the Bible, records the bloody history of the conflict between the Israelites and the other peoples of the Middle Eastern region. It tells glorious stories of war and shocking accounts of genocide. Anyone who reads the Old Testament with unbiased eyes will readily discern its dominant theme of racial and ethnic supremacism. There are many blatant expressions of ethnic supremacism:

Israelites are a “chosen people,” chosen by God above all the other peoples of the world.[8]

Israelites have a right to rule over all other people and are promised that they will someday own and rule over the whole world.[9]

Israelites boast of genocide against whole peoples and kingdoms.[10]

Israelites are commanded to murder all the people of the lands where they intend to live, and to kill all the people of foreign nations that do not submit themselves in slavery.[11]

Israelites are forbidden to make slaves of their own people, but are encouraged to enslave non-Israelites whom they may pass down as slaves to their descendants forever.[12]

Israelites are forbidden to intermarry or “mix their seed” with other peoples.[13]

Few people dare to even acknowledge the blatant racial supremacism of the Bible. And those who become aware of the extreme Jewish supremacism in the Old Testament tend to believe that such sentiments are relegated to ancient times and have no influence on the present. Jewish Supremacism, however, shows that the powerful ethnocentrism of ancient Judaism has continued to thrive to the modern day. I will offer compelling evidence that Jewish supremacism is alive and well in the 21st Century. It has a dramatic and increasing effect on world events.

It can be said that I as a Christian also revere the same Old Testament books of supremacy. The difference, of course, is that the Christian New Testament represents a profound shift from the Old. In place of an “eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth,” Jesus Christ taught “turn the other cheek.” In contrast to Jewish supremacism, Christianity offers universal salvation.

Judaism bitterly rejected Jesus Christ and has never enjoyed his teachings of love and tolerance. In fact, not only did the Jewish high priests, the Pharisees, pursue the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, these leaders guided their faith in the opposite ideological direction. It can be said that in addition to the crucifixion of Christ’s body, they killed his spirit in their own hearts.

It would be wrong to hate or persecute present-day Jews because of the role of Jewish leaders in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, but it is important to understand the ideological, religious and ethnic war born during those times.

From the earliest days of Christianity, Jewry became its chief persecutor, for the Pharisees saw the Christian salvation of both “Jew and Greek” as a threat to their ethnic purity and supremacism. It should be said that Judaism is also diametrically opposed to the Muslim faith, which like Christianity also has been interpreted as a universal message. Not only did Jewish supremacists oppose Jesus himself, they mercilessly persecuted his followers, the early Christians.

Yet for fear of the Jews no one spoke openly of him (John 7:13)[14]

. . .for you suffered like things of your own countrymen as they did from the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out and displease God, and oppose all men (1 Thessalonians 2:14-16)[15]

Over the next few centuries, they codified Jewish oral tradition and adopted the Babylonian Talmud as their most important religious text. According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, it even supersedes the Torah in authority.[16] As Jesus Christ represents an evolution of greater love and tolerance, the Talmud only intensified the Torah’s chauvinism. I will thoroughly document this fact from Jewish texts themselves and through quotes from major Jewish scholars who discuss the Talmud’s meaning. The Talmud’s unashamed and frequent references to non-Jews as animals and “supernal refuse,”[17] as well as accounts of boiling their enemies in semen and excrement[18] are expressions of racial hatred that would have made Hitler blush.

I will prove this controversial statement in this book and even show how mainstream Judaic authorities, such as uncensored editions of another major Jewish resource, The Jewish Encyclopedia, confirm the Talmud’s hateful anti-Gentile teachings. I will also show that rabid anti-Gentile teachings are still promoted in modern times by many of the largest Jewish publications, such as the most popular Jewish newspaper in the United States, The Jewish Press. More than any other newspaper, it sets the tone of Jewish religious and cultural attitudes.

One of its primary religious authorities is Rabbi Simcha Cohen, who has an instructional Dear Abby-type column called Halachic Questions. Not long ago, Rabbi Cohen instructed his readers that the Talmud denotes Gentiles as “animals” (as outlined by Talmudic writings from Gemara Kiddushin 68a and Metzia 114b).[19] In another section he discusses how a Jewish woman is not designated as a prostitute if she has premarital sex with a Jew, but she is a whore if she has any sexual relations with a Gentile, even if she is married.

Marriage to a Gentile can never be sanctified or condoned, such a liaison classifies the woman as a zona…common parlance interprets the term zona to refer to a prostitute…. [20]

Another major Jewish publication, The Jewish Chronicle, in an article called “Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen Words,“ reveals that the Jewish word for Gentile woman is the offensive Yiddish word shiksa — meaning “whore,” from the Hebrew root, sheigetz (“abomination”). It also pointed out that a little Gentile girl is called shikselke, meaning “little female abomination.”[21]

Shiksa – the Jewish term for a Gentile woman, from the root word sheigetz meaning “abomination” or “whore.”

Shikselke – a Gentile little girl, meaning “little female abomination.”

How would Jews and the media react if Gentiles casually referred to Jewish women and little girls as “Jewish whores” and “little Jewish whores”? What would happen to any politician or entertainer in the world who referred to Jewish women and little girls as Jewish whores? Am I now supposed to be called an anti-Semite because I simply dare to expose such hateful anti-Gentilism proven in the two most influential Jewish newspapers in America?

The Talmud’s extreme supremacist teachings have certainly been a powerful factor in preventing assimilation of the Jewish people with Christian and Muslim communities. Even though Jews have lived as only a small minority in Gentile nations for more than 3000 years, major Jewish geneticists and anthropologists proudly assert that Jews have preserved their distinctive genetic identity.[22] I will show how supremacist doctrines of fear and hatred of Gentiles, along with notions of Jewish superiority, are carefully instilled in every generation. Every young Jew learns of the perfidious nature of the Gentiles from Pharaoh to Hitler. They are taught that they are “chosen” above all people on earth: perhaps the ultimate expression of ethnic superiority.

This volume will show that the official policies of modern Israel and many of the leading elements of World Jewry still embody radically supremacist sentiments and policies. Organized Jewish elements around the world doggedly pursue their own supremacist agendas. Those agendas frequently conflict with the interests of the host nations in which they live.

My assertion that there exists a powerful, cohesive, worldwide Jewish supremacism finds confirmation in evidence mostly provided by the Jewish supremacists themselves. Their supremacist ideology finds clear enunciation in the foundation, structure and conduct of Israel, a nation unabashedly based on an ethnic supremacism. It is a state that has dispossessed, terrorized and grossly violated the human and civil rights of the Palestinian people.

What is Jewish Supremacism?

The definition of White supremacism from the Random House unabridged Webster’s Dictionary denotes it as “belief in superiority over other races and retaining of control in all relationships.” Let’s take the definition and apply it specifically to the term Jewish supremacism.

Jewish supremacism – The belief, theory or doctrine that the Jewish people are superior to all others and should retain control in all relationships.

As to the first part of the definition, this book assembles powerful evidence that many of the leading Jews of the world have a belief, theory or doctrine that they are superior to all other peoples. I will also clearly show that they seek control in all relationships with other peoples. David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first Prime Minister, often called the “George Washington of Israel” said specifically that he believed in the “moral and intellectual superiority” of the Jewish people.[23] That sentiment is frequent in the writings of Jewish leaders throughout the world. Imagine the outcry if the President of the United States pronounced that he believes in the moral and intellectual superiority of the White race! The Jewish dominated world media have so shielded Jewish supremacists from criticism that their most famous leaders can say such things without fear of any repercussion.

There was no outrage expressed by the world press when Ben-Gurion made his remark, nor did any protest ensue from his supremacist prophecy quoted in Look magazine in 1962; a prediction that Israel would one day sit atop a one world government.

“In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind.”[24]

It also seemed cruelly ironic to his Palestinian victims that there was little outcry when the boastful terrorist Menachem Begin was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Begin brags in his book, The Revolt, about the massacre of over two hundred men, women and children at Deir Yassin. [25] The world hunts down suspected Nazi war criminals, but gives a blood-stained Jewish one…the Nobel Peace Prize! That one event should tell us who is really supreme in the modern world.

The other necessary part of the definition of supremacism denotes having control over other races. I will argue that Jewish supremacists seek to control the nations in which they dwell. They make concerted efforts to dominate the two most critical factors of power in the modern world, mass media and government. This book provides documented evidence of their incredible supremacy in these sectors. This extreme concentration of power exists not only in America, but in most of the major nations of the world including Canada, Britain, Russia, France, Brazil and many more. It is a universal pattern suggesting design rather than accident.

Israel: A Jewish Supremacist State

Israel came into being by massive ethnic cleansing and displacement of Palestine’s indigenous population. At the time of the Balfour Declaration in 1917, Jews made up only 10 percent of the population of what today is Israel. After the Zionist terrorists drove out the British and expelled most of the Palestinian population in 1947 and 1948, Jewish supremacists established Israel. It still scrupulously preserves the cultural and genetic identity of the Jewish people.

Israel protects its Jewish control over its ethnic enclave by carefully guarding its ethnic makeup. It bases its immigration on a genetic standard and limits immigration almost exclusively to those of biological Jewish descent. An atheist Jew from New York City who has never stepped foot inside Israel is financially helped to immigrate, while hundreds of thousands of Palestinians whose families lived there thousands of years cannot return to their birthplace.

Israel is not a “multicultural nation.” It is unashamedly a Jewish state devoted exclusively to the interests, heritage and religion of the Jewish people. A nation with a sizable Palestinian minority, it is certainly the most rigidly segregated society in the world. Separate schools exist for Jews and Arabs, separate apartment complexes, separate neighborhoods and separate settlements. Many policies adversely affect Palestinians as compared to Jews. For instance, Palestinians are forbidden from joining normal units of the military. A former member of Israel’s Supreme Court, Haim Cohen, described the system that applies to Jews and Palestinians in Israel as similar to “Nuremberg laws” of Nazi Germany:

…the bitter irony of fate which has led the same biological and racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infamous Nuremberg laws, to serve as a basis for the definition of Judaism within the State of Israel.[26]

I go deeply into the subject of Israel in the body of this book, but I should not leave the subject now without pointing out that the Jewish supremacism that dominates Israel receives little negative press around the world. Consider the positive press that Israel receives as compared to the unanimous and universal media condemnation that was heaped upon the former apartheid regime in South Africa. Condemnation of South Africa was hypocritically led by an American media thoroughly dominated by Israeli partisans.

I slowly became aware of a dual morality permeating Jewish-Gentile relations. Jews preach one morality for themselves and another for the non-Jewish world. Their highest morality is one of racial pride, solidarity, tradition and self-interest. But they preached diversity and liberalism for their perceived competitors. If such dualism did not exist, how could the Jewish-dominated American media:

Support the nation of Israel, which promotes Judaism in its schools, while opposing even the singing of Christmas carols in American public schools?

Support the nation of Israel, which has strictly segregated schools, communities and facilities for Jews and Arabs, while condemning segregated schools and housing in America and South Africa?

Support the nation of Israel, with its restrictive “Jews Only” immigration laws, while subverting American attempts to curtail even illegal immigration?

Support the nation of Israel, which allows every Jewish citizen to carry a machine gun if desired, while advocating gun control for American citizens?

Support the nation of Israel, which openly states its mission to preserve the Jewish people and heritage, while condemning Palestinians who desire their own state, and scourging European-Americans who dare to advocate the preservation of the Western heritage and culture in America?

Always depict the historical relations between Jews and Gentiles with the Gentiles as evildoers and the Jews as innocent victims, while condemning Gentiles as “anti-Semites” if they dare defend themselves from such ethnic slanders?

Such double standards in the mass media raise other questions. Why is the world press so myopic in regard to Israel’s ethnic suppression? Is it reasonable to suspect that the bias in the press could be a result of a preponderance of Jewish power? Regarding subjects such as Jewish supremacism, this domination certainly affords a reason why the term Jewish supremacism, unlike White supremacism, is never used by the press. Nor is the concept even explored. Even when Meir Kahane called Palestinians “dogs” and advocated forcibly expelling all Palestinians from Israeli occupied territory, he was never referred to as a Jewish supremacist.

On February 25, 1994, an American Jew, Baruch Goldstein, entered a mosque in Hebron and machine-gunned Palestinians at prayer, killing 29 of them. Some Jewish groups in both America and Israel have since made Goldstein a saint, building shrines for him both in America and in Israel. Neither Goldstein nor those who have built shrines to him are ever referred to as Jewish supremacists or even as “anti-Gentiles.”[27] On the opposite hand, if a Gentile even dares to quote the statement by Haim Cohen comparing Israel’s laws to Nazi Nuremberg Laws, he will certainly find himself labeled an “anti-Semite” by the media.

The double standard of world governments and the press is often quite amazing. President George W. Bush, in the aftermath of the World Trade Center bombings of September 11, 2001, announced that any nation that harbors terrorists will feel the wrath of American bombs.

Not long after this pronouncement, Mr. Bush dined with one of the world’s worst terrorists, the Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon. As the world knows, Sharon has a long record of terrorism and murder, including responsibility for the massacre of 1,500 men, women and women children in the Sabra and Chatila refugee camps in Lebanon. During dinner, Mr. Bush did not so much as drop an olive on Mr. Sharon. Unlike hapless Afghanistan, no American bombs have fallen on Tel Aviv for harboring terrorists. In fact, Israel not only harbors terrorists, it has elevated many to be their supreme leaders. Sharon is not the first terrorist who made it to Prime Minister; some of the worst terrorists who achieved that position are Begin, Shamir and Barak.

One might argue that the existence of a supremacist Israeli state does not necessarily mean that the Diaspora (Jews outside of Israel) has the same supremacist agenda. However, one should consider the fact that organized Jewry all over the world devotedly supports the supremacist state of Israel. Secondly, there is ample evidence that policies of Jewish supremacy extend far beyond the boundaries of Israel. Powerful Jews in media and government around the world frequently act to exert control over the peoples among whom they live.

A Worldwide Agenda

Organized Jewry can be clearly shown to have had worldwide strategic objectives since the beginning of the last century. For instance, an early 20th Century goal of Russian and World Jewry was the overthrow of what they considered to be the anti-Semitic, Czarist government of Imperial Russia. Jewish communities around the world supported the establishment of a proto-Jewish, Communist regime in Russia. They provided most of the leadership and financing[28] for the “Russian Revolution,” a revolution that was actually more Jewish led than Russian led. Its chief financier was in fact the New York Jewish capitalist and extreme Jewish supremacist, Jacob Schiff. [29]

One of the many startling documents I cite comes from the National Archives of the United States. It reveals that in the first government of Communist Russia there were only 13 ethnic Russians and more than 300 Jews out of a total of 384 Commissars.[30] Let that startling fact sink in: there were only 13 ethnic Russians in the first Bolshevik government of the “Russian Revolution.” The chief correspondent of the London Times in Russia at the time described it as nothing short of an “alien invasion” and takeover of Russia by Jews.[31] The same was said by our American ambassador to Russia, David Francis,[32] and by American intelligence officers in Russia. Even Winston Churchill described the Russian Revolution as a takeover by Bolshevik Jews that had “…seized the Russian people by the hair of their heads and become the masters of this enormous empire.” [33] This is just a small preview of the startling documents found in this book.

The successful overthrow of a major national government (and murder of its ruling family) as part of a world Jewish agenda shows that even in the early days of the 20th Century they had considerable worldwide economic, political and media power. In the years since, their power has grown exponentially. Most people are still completely unaware of the paramount role of Jewry in the origins of Bolshevism in Russia and the spreading of Communism throughout the world.

The public’s lack of knowledge in this area illustrates Jewry’s influential role in academia and media. Otherwise, how could such important and easily verifiable facts of history be kept from common knowledge?

It also reveals the incredible cohesion and coordination of Jewish power around the world that can be mobilized for specific Jewish objectives. Another example of the power they wield in the highest councils of major nations was their successful effort for the establishment of Israel. From the issuance of the Balfour Declaration (only very recently did the world learn that the author of it was actually a secret Jew)[34] to the founding and continuing support for Israel, to the Iraq War, they have shown the ability to get what they want.

Jewish supremacy has a hypocritical and a jealous nature. If the people among whom the Jewish supremacists reside would adopt programs of ethnic loyalty and solidarity similar to the Jewish supremacists, extremist Jews could obviously not exercise power and control, for they are only a small percentage of the population. Only when the ethnic and nationalist feelings of the host people are diminished can Jewish supremacists accumulate enough power to achieve their agenda. A clear pattern of Jewish influence in academia, government and media aims at weakening all ethnic solidarity and loyalty among their host peoples while purposely encouraging ethnic pride and solidarity among Jews. There is a concerted effort to weaken the group solidarity of Palestinians, Britons, Frenchmen, European-Americans, African-Americans and among Muslims in the Arab world. They seek any method to divide and weaken their enemies, as they are achieving their goal in the division of Iraq today. This pattern is also present within all nations wherever there are significant numbers of extremist Jews.

Divide and Conquer

Supremacist Jews fear and oppose all ethnic solidarity other than their own. In the Western nations they consistently oppose all organizations seeking to preserve the interests and heritage of Europeans. Likewise, in non-European nations, they consistently work to break down the solidarity and homogeneity of the prominent ethnic group. It is part of the Jewish supremacist modus operandi to foment diverse immigration and multiculturalism in every nation they reside in (except, of course, for Israel), as they see a squabbling, disunited society as easy prey to their intense and well-organized efforts at control. Dr. Stephen Steinlight, the former officer of the American Jewish Committee whom I quoted earlier, puts it in amazingly blunt terms:

For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agenda.[35]

In America, not only have they worked to weaken the solidarity of European-Americans, they actively opposed African American nationalist movements such as Marcus Garvey’s movement and the Nation of Islam. Those Black organizations simply desired to preserve their own heritage rather than assimilate into a multicultural society. Jewish supremacists hypocritically want no one other than themselves to be conscious of their own heritage and special interests. They try to make other groups feel guilty for even having pride in their own culture. They paint ethnic pride and cohesion in other peoples as supremacist or hateful.

A pertinent example of this divide and conquer method can be seen in Palestine and Lebanon. Most Palestinians and Lebanese are Muslim, but significant numbers are Christian. Israel has actively promoted hatred and civil war between Christians and Muslims in the Middle East. One of the reasons that Ariel Sharon arranged for the slaughter of Muslim refugees by the Lebanese Phalangist militia forces in 1982 was to promote bitter hatred and war among Israel’s Arab enemies. The diaries of one of Israel’s former Prime Ministers, Moshe Sharett, exposed the fact that this was one of Israel’s main tactics.[36] The destabilization of nations by encouraging massive multiracial and multi-religious immigration, as well as promotion of existing ethnic and religious divisions within nations, has been a long-practiced strategy of Jewish supremacists.

This attempt to break down their enemy’s ethnic solidarity can be explained in the context of the Palestinian people. If Israel’s displaced Palestinians fully assimilate in foreign lands with their host populations and thus lose their identity as Palestinians, they and their assimilated descendants are certainly not as likely to support the Palestinian cause. If Jewish populations do not assimilate, they are more likely to support the Jewish state.

While they attempt to break down other peoples’ ethnic loyalty, Jewish supremacist forces in the media sponsor a chronic recital of historical anti-Semitism. Such a focus has two objectives. First, it heightens Jewish solidarity and worldwide support for Israel, and secondly, it stimulates collective Jewish hatred for the Gentile world and thus lessens Jewish assimilation. The recital of Gentile perfidy against Jews also protects them from Gentile criticism, for if anyone dares to criticize Jewish supremacism, he is painted as morally equivalent to the perpetrators of the Holocaust. The official Holocaust story has assumed a religious stature, and if anyone questions a single line of the Holocaust scripture he becomes a modern heretic now referred to as a “denier.”

Another example of the hypocrisy of the Jewish supremacists can be seen in the intermarriage issue. During his campaign for President, George Bush found himself excoriated by the press for speaking at Bob Jones University, an institution that opposes interracial dating and marriage. Of course, during the campaign both George Bush and Al Gore made many obligatory speeches for many Jewish organizations. The irony is that every synagogue in America and every major Jewish organization vigorously opposes intermarriage of Jews with non-Jews. In Israel itself the marriage of a Jew or non-Jew is outlawed. Of course, this blatant double standard finds no mention in America’s supposedly fair and free press. Such exposure would not be good for Jewish public relations.

Of course, not all Jews are supremacist any more than all Germans were Nazis during the Hitler era, but the fact remains that organized Jewry has pursued a successful agenda that has amassed incredible power in modern times. With the creation of Israel, they have established the most ethnically supremacist nation on earth. Even more importantly, they have managed to acquire enormous power in many of the major governments of the world (especially the United States) and today they thoroughly dominate the world news and entertainment media. My well-documented chapter about the media will prove that their power is far greater than you might suspect.

Silencing Their Critics

The extent of Jewish power is precisely why the general public is unaware of it, for those who know it also know the high price they would pay for openly discussing it. In America, doing so can result in damage of one’s reputation, or even the loss of business or employment. Such truth telling can result in threats, intimidation and even physical attacks by groups such as the Jewish Defense League. The Anti-Defamation League is always busy accusing their critics of racial, religious or ethnic intolerance, while they defend and deny Israel’s blatant racism and supremacism. This Jewish supremacist group can ruin the business or the political career of almost anyone they choose.

Even more dangerously, Jewish supremacists have now been successful in imprisoning their critics in many European nations. They cannot as of yet freely assassinate their critics in Western countries as they have hundreds of Palestinian writers, poets and clerics across the Arab world. In today’s Europe, however, simply quoting the supremacist statements of Jewish leaders can land one in prison.

There are hundreds of dissidents in prison at this moment who dared to simply speak or write openly about Jewish ethnic intolerance. Although the media constantly allege that, unlike the Nazis, we have free speech, there are citizens of European nations right now in prison for simply questioning some Jewish versions of the Holocaust.

Jewish supremacists have made an intense effort to weaken the sense of ethnic awareness and loyalty among Europeans. In our modern media’s political correctness, it is considered “hate speech” for Europeans to speak about their love for their heritage and express their desire to preserve it. As a European-American, I do believe that my people have a right to preserve their way of life. At the same time I recognize that natural right for all the different peoples and nationalities of the Earth. For instance, how odd it is that the Palestinians, who have been ethnically cleansed from their own nation and denied their most basic human rights, are so often characterized as “anti-Semites” and “terrorists,” while the “anti-Gentile,” Jewish supremacists who have terrorized them and stolen their country are little criticized by the world press.

Palestinians and those in the Arab world need to understand that the source of their own plight comes from the fact that European-Americans have been prevented from defending their own national interests and heritage just as Palestinians have been so prevented. Palestinians will never find liberation in their nation until European-Americans find liberation in America from Jewish supremacism.

Although I am certainly an activist for European Americans, I respect and applaud every people who desire to preserve their own way of life and even more vitally, their very existence as an ethnic entity. To me, ethnic survival is the most basic of human rights. It also is a fundamental human right for people to live under a government and also a news and entertainment media that reflect their own basic values, traditions, social and economic interests. A nation under the power of an alien and destructive mass media is equally oppressed as one under the power of a foreign, occupying government.

The increasing globalism of the 21st Century, driven on by Jewish supremacists, will continue to decrease the choices and freedoms of all people. Moreover, it will endanger the preservation of individual cultures, traditions, values, religious beliefs and ethnic identities. The end result of globalism will be an enormous world government, one that will crush freedom and diversity as a steamroller would a flower.

The idea that government should represent its own people and not any foreign power is the driving principle of the Declaration of Independence and America’s nationhood: the right of a people to have a government of their own and for their own interests. The preamble to the Constitution of the United States puts it succinctly when it talks of a government “for ourselves and our posterity.”

In America, the Jewish domination of key United States government positions is amazing. During President Clinton’s administration, the leading Israeli newspaper, Maariv, described “warm Jews,” meaning Jews loyal to the interests of Israel, as holding critically important positions on the United States’ National Security Council. Maariv stated that 7 of its 11 members are “warm Jews.” [37]

Jewish Supremacism was primarily researched and written during the Clinton Administration, and as such offers a sliver of historical time. But, do not imagine that the inordinate Jewish power diminished under the administration of President George Bush. His presidency began with fewer Jews in the most visible positions, but the underlying government bureaucracy that spans different administrations is as Jewish as ever. A good example is Alan Greenspan who has served as chairman of the powerful Federal Reserve for many administrations of both parties. His replacement, probably the most powerful economic position in the entire world, was Ben Shalom Bernanke, a man who each day has privileged information that could easily enrich his extremist brethren by billions of dollars.

In the National Security Council there has been increasing Jewish consolidation from the first days of the Bush presidency. Richard Sale of UPI on February 28, 2003 wrote about Zionist Elliott Abrams: “A staff shake-up at the National Security Council is likely to mean the United States will take a harder pro-Israel stance in the Middle East…Elliott Abrams, the controversial former Reagan administration official who President Bush last December appointed to the NSC to take charge of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, has removed several staff members who were regarded as even-handed on the issue.”[38]

There are thousands of books and movies, many written, produced and marketed by supremacist Jews that condemn doctrines and movements of racial or ethnic supremacy among non-Jews. Few books, however, dare to examine the world’s oldest, most powerful and virulent form of ethnic supremacism: Jewish supremacism. The Jewish dominated mass media are filled with stories about the dangers of Muslim extremism. It seems that if these supremacist Jews were honest, they could better write about the supremacism they know the most about: their own. And my contention of course is that Jewish extremists are far more dangerous than Muslim extremists, in that they virtually have their fingers on the unimaginably horrific weapons of the world’s only superpower. In fact, they have used these weapons to support massive terror against a nation that did not attack us and did us absolutely no harm: the nation of Iraq.

Jewish Supremacism will show specifically how Jewish supremacists have used their political and media power to impose their will on American and other nations although their agenda clearly opposes the true interests of those nations. An excellent example is the Iraq War.

The Iraq War

It is no accident that the two nations most under the influence of Jewish supremacists, the United States and Britain, launched a military invasion against Iraq in March 2003. In going to war against Iraq, America fought against itself. It launched a war certain to cause more hatred and terrorism against the United States, cost hundreds of billions of dollars, and will inflict terrible damage to American economic and diplomatic interests at home and abroad. Even more importantly, it was a callous betrayal the brave fighting men of the American military who should never be put in harm’s way other than for the true security and freedom of the American people.

The most famous influential and long-time proponents of the war are the ardent Zionist extremists Richard Perle, chairman of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, and Paul Wolfowitz. Perle and his wife were also founders of JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security. Perle and a well-networked cabal of Jewish Neocons (neo-conservatives) became the primary propagandists for the war. They included many former prominent Marxists, such as Norman Podhoretz, who opposed the Vietnam War, but morphed into a conservative hawk for Israel. Podhoretz has served as editor of Commentary, the magazine of American Jewish Committee. Among the other Jewish Neocons were Scooter Libby, Elliot Cohen, Douglas Feith, Bill Kristol, David Wurmser, Elliott Abrams, Michael Ledeen, Michael Kagan, Daniel Blumenthal Michael Rubin, Paul Frum, Henry Kissinger and even the former Marxist and Black Panther supporter David Horowitz.

Back in 1996, Perle, Feith and Wurmser were behind a report entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. It called for war on Iraq not for the United States, but for securing Israel’s realm. It was written for the incoming Israeli Likud Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Once the Israelis decided to create an American war against Iraq, they then had to manufacture the rationale for the war, so they said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that Iraq had threatened America. The mass media collaborated. Of course, Israel was far guiltier of every alleged transgression than was Iraq. But, the Jewish supremacists in the media never would draw the obvious comparisons:

Why Go to War Against Iraq?

Iraq has weapons of mass destruction

Yet, Israel has one of the largest and most deadly arsenals of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons in the world.

Iraq tried to forestall UN inspectors.

Yet, Israel has never even allowed any inspections of its huge stockpile of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Israel blocked UN investigations of Israeli war crimes such as Sharon’s Sabra and Chatila massacre and the mass murder at Jenin.

Iraq had invaded and occupied its neighbor Kuwait.

Yet, Israel invaded and brutally occupied Lebanon for 18 years, killing over 20,000 civilians and destroying 100,000 homes.

Iraq had brutally occupied the Kurdish areas of Iraq.

Yet, Israel has militarily occupied the three million people of the West Bank and Gaza for 35 years, a brutal occupation that has killed and maimed tens of thousands of Palestinians, forced many into squalid concentration (refugee) camps, tortured hundreds of thousands in its prisons, and denied Palestinians of even the most elementary human rights.

Iraq was danger to the United States.

Yet, Iraq had never raised a finger against the United States, while Israel had a long record of terrorism and treachery against the United States such as in the Lavon Affair, attack on the U.S.S. Liberty and the Pollard spy case.

Iraq had violated UN resolutions such as UN Resolution 1441.

Yet, Israel had violated more than three times as many UN resolutions as Iraq, including many supported by the United States. For 35 years, Israel has violated UN Resolution 242 demanding a complete Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza.

If a case could be made for war against Iraq for the offenses claimed by the Jewish Neocons and the media, a far stronger case could be made for a war against Israel! The war against Iraq was an immoral, hypocritical war — a war fought for Israel and against every vital interest of the United States of America. It was a war that simply could not have been possible without the Jewish-supremacist domination of both the government and the media.

For simply mentioning the obvious role of the organized Jewish community behind the Iraq War, U.S. Congressman Jim Moran was actually forced to resign his Democratic leadership post. Associated Press on March 14, 2003, reports: “Rep. Jim Moran, D-Va., was forced out of his party leadership post Friday after a furor over his remarks about the role of American Jews in a possible war with Iraq.”[39] It is fascinating to see Jewish supremacists exercise their power at the very same moment they deny such power exists.

Defending the Rights of All People

I see the value of all people preserving their cultural, national and even genetic heritage. All peoples have the right to preserve their unique identities, including Jews. This book shows that much of the organized Jewish leadership pursues goals of self-preservation and self-advancement tenaciously, while consistently demonizing other nationalities and races who dare to act similarly in their own interests.

Their ultimate victory would cause not only the loss of freedom, but also the destruction of the diverse heritage and culture of all peoples on the earth. It is my hope that all of us, all nations and every people, while acknowledging our respective differences of religion, race, culture and nationality —will work together to defend ourselves from the one incredibly powerful supremacism that threatens us all.

Hypocritically, the same forces that support Jewish supremacism have accused me of being a “White supremacist.” I reject that epithet, for unlike Jewish supremacists, I don’t seek to rule over or control any other race; I simply want to preserve my own heritage. Recognizing that there are intrinsic differences in culture, behavior, tradition, and even genetics among the different races does not make one a supremacist. The belief that every people has the right to preserve its heritage and be free of control of others is not supremacism. It is the opposite of supremacism. Supremacism is when one group tries to control or be supreme over another. Jewish supremacists seek not only control over the Palestinian people and the Arab world, they seek supremacy in almost every nation in which they dwell.

One of the tactics that the Jewish supremacists have used against me and against this book is to claim that I am a White supremacist and a racist. They do this by constantly referring to my Ku Klux Klan membership as a young man. It is important to state here that I have not been involved with any Klan group for almost 30 years. Also, the organization I led was entirely legal and nonviolent. No member of my group as ever charged or even accused of violence against anyone.

When I left the organization almost thirty years ago, I stated clearly and publicly that I left because I did not want to be associated with an organization that had a media image of hatred or violence. Then as now, I say clearly that I condemn any person or any group that truly supports violence, terrorism or hatred, whether they be White, Black, Jewish or of any ethnic, racial or religious group.

Contrast my treatment in the media for my politically incorrect thoughts of thirty years ago to the treatment of those who committed great crimes against humanity such as Ariel Sharon of Israel, or media treatment of the many officials of murderous communist regimes who have returned to power in reformed communist states.

Even though journalists write about and interview former communists in the politics in both Western and Eastern Europe, seldom is one of them introduced as “former Communist.” Although men such as Nelson Mandela engaged in terrorist bombings as a young man, he is never introduced to the TV audience as Nelson Mandela, “former terrorist.” Although Ariel Sharon was found responsible even by an Israeli commission for the massacre of over 1200 Palestinian men, woman and children at Sabra and Chatila, he is not introduced as “War Criminal” Ariel Sharon.

Even though the media cannot say that I have ever harmed a single human being, the press often headlines, and almost always begins current news articles about me as David Duke, former KKK leader, and says nothing about my distinguished career in the 30 years since that time. I am not introduced with my proper title of Representative, as is normal for past Representatives, Senators and Presidents. They would choke rather than use my legitimate and hard-earned title of Dr. David Duke. They certainly don’t say bestselling author David Duke. It is as if former Klansman David Duke is on my birth certificate. Senator Robert Byrd is a former Klan leader who went on to vote for Israel hundreds of times in the Senate, is Senator Robert Byrd is not introduced as former Klansman Robert Byrd. George Bush is a former drug user. He is not introduced as George Bush, “former coke-head.”

Divulging this fact about my long ago past is legitimate, as it would be about any public person, but notice that when one is a friend of Zionism his controversial past becomes a footnote, but when one opposes Zionism his past becomes a headline. I truly believe that if in my political career I would have gone on to sell out America to the Jewish extremists and to Israel, the Jewish media condemnations would have been transformed to praise. I can see their accolades. Isn’t it great David Duke could overcome his past, they would say.

The press also does not mention the fact I actually won the 1988 Democratic Vice-Presidential Primary election in the State of New Hampshire with over 60 percent of the vote. In 1989 I ran as a Republican to win election to the House of Representatives in Louisiana. In a state of roughly the size and population of Austria, in races for Governor and for U.S. Senator I won over 60 percent of the European American vote in each election. In the race for President in 1992, I received more votes in some Republican primaries than a number of far better-financed sitting Republican senators. In 1996 I won election as a member of the Parish Executive Committee of the largest Republican district in Louisiana. The other 13 elected members later unanimously elected me as chairman where I served to 2000. I then spent some years in Eastern Europe and entered in the graduate program at the largest university in Ukraine, MAUP, where I received a full doctorate in History.

I have been invited to lecture at over 100 major universities and I have traveled the world speaking against the crimes of Zionism against the Palestinian and Mideast peoples, and the terrible damage done to the United States by the Zionist control of our foreign policy. I exposed the Israeli terrorist attacks against the United States in the Lavon Affair and in their the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty. I warned that that the treachery of Israeli agent Jonathan Pollard would be repeated, and long before 9/11, I said that America’s Israeli-dictated policies would lead to terrorism and great harm to the American people.

After 9/11 and before the start of the Iraq War, I exposed the obvious truth that Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction and that the Iraq War was being orchestrated by powerful Jewish extremists in the United States media and government.

In November 2002, just a few months before the start of the war, Newsweek magazine, Periscope Section, revealed that the United States State Department threatened to yank the media credentials of the Al Jazeera satellite news TV network if they dared to interview on a prime-time program. Al Jazeera courageously had me on anyway, but within a month I was informed that Zionist-extremist Michael Chertoff had authorized federal tax and financial charges against me. I spent 13 months in the American gulag (for more on this see chapter 11).

Far from breaking my spirit, imprisonment only rededicated me to my work, my education, and my writing and speaking out against the greatest threat to freedom and peace, International Zionism. Upon my release I finished my Doctorate and have since lectured at universities across Europe, America and the Middle East, and built on my controversial reputation as the best known anti-Zionist in the world.

At Harvard University, the respected J. F. Kennedy School of Government published a paper in 2006 by professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer titled “Israel and U.S. Foreign Policy.” Zionists such as Alan Dershowitz condemned it saying it was simply copied from my website and “could have been written by David Duke. “ Far from invalidating Walt and Mearsheimer, Dershowitz’s comments have only really confirmed the scholarship of my own work, for he shows that professors at the most prestigious university in the United States have now adopted my positions. You will see why in this book.

In 2006, I was invited to speak at the Holocaust Conference in Tehran, Iran. My speech centered on the vital need for freedom of speech on all issues, and the disgrace of the European laws that put people in prison for speaking their opinion and conscience. I met with Iran’s outspoken President, Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and saw first hand how the Zionist influenced media and government officials have raised passions for a catastrophic war against Iran by blatant lies in constant use of the “wipe Israel off the map” mistranslation.

I am committed to world peace, to freedom and independence for my own and indeed, all nations. All peoples have the right to preserve their unique heritages. Jewish supremacism remains the greatest threat to those ideals and to all peoples.

——————————————————

Much of this book is taken from my autobiography, My Awakening. It is an account of my personal journey of awakening to the reality of Jewish supremacism. You will find its real power in the many direct quotations from important Jewish sources, all of which I carefully document with hundreds of source notes for your reference.

Jewish Supremacism is a thesis in autobiographical form. It is the story of my awakening on the Jewish Question that began when I was a young man beginning in the late 1960s. Most of my fundamental understanding was in place by the end of that decade, but my knowledge has grown much deeper over the last 30 years. Since the 1960s, much new scientific and political material has become available. In recounting my awakening, I am not trying to give the reader the impression that all the materials or studies I cite were available in the 1960s. I weave into this narrative contemporary data and documentation so the reader has the benefit of the latest information. Also, for reasons of coherence and organization, I focus on one primary area of discovery at a time, while in life the acquisition of knowledge is not so neatly compartmentalized. The reader will find some repetition in Jewish quotes that I find particularly revealing. They are repeated when especially pertinent to more than one topic.

Also, I would be remiss not to add that when I write “I learned” or “I discovered,” I take no credit for original research, for my education on these subjects came from innumerable authors and their books and articles. I am in debt to them as well as to my many supporters and friends who have educated me with the insights and knowledge acquired in their own awakening. I assemble, organize, analyze and comment on materials collected by scholars and writers from ancient times to the present.

My preface finished, I must close my notebook and come down from Aspen Mountain. In doing so, I realize that I am not leaving the Natural World, for its laws continue in the world of human conflict below. The struggle for life and freedom exists among the different varieties of mankind as certainly as it does for every form of life and energy on this mountain.

Taking part in the struggle for my own people’s life and freedom is as natural as the flow of the crystal stream running down the mountain beside me. It is my hope that the European people, the Palestinian people and indeed, all peoples of the world, are permitted the most basic human right of all: to live — to preserve their own unique cultures, freedom and identity. To do so, they must resist the earth’s ultimate supremacism: Jewish supremacism.

I would be a fool not to realize the danger to my own life, reputation and freedom that I face by exposing Jewish supremacism. But, as a loyal European-American; as a patriotic citizen of the United States and also, as one who sincerely wishes for justice for all people of the world — my duty is clear.

So, coming down from Aspen Mountain, I see the stream next to me. It follows its course. So will I.

David Duke

Former Member of the House of Representatives

State of Louisiana, United States of America

——————————————————————————–

[1] New Republic. (1992). May 4.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky. (1999). Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. Pluto Press, p.B8-62

[4] Samuel, Michael. (1999) email sent to major organizations opposing government funding of Chabad Lubavitch religious center in Montreal. Oct. 23.

5 Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA) (2006) White House to Chabad: Bush won’t press Israel. June 27, 2006,

[6] Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy. Washington DC: Center for Immigration Studies. October.

[7] Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion. Boulder, Colorado. Pluto Press.

[8] KJV Deuteronomy 7:6

[9] Jub. 32:18 19

[10] KJV Joshua 6:21; KJV Joshua 10:37; RSV Deuteronomy 20:16

[11] RSV Deuteronomy 20:10-18

[12] KJV Leviticus 25:44-46.

[13] KJV Deuteronomy 7:2-3; Ezra 9:12

[14] RSV John 7:13.

[15] RSV 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16.

[16] Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, “Authority” p.637.

[17] New Republic. (1992). May.

[18] Simon, M. Trans. (1936). 57a Gittin. London. Soncino Press. p.261

[19] The Jewish Press. (1988). Feb. 19. 10A.

[20] The Jewish Press. (1988). Feb. 19. 8C.

[21] Bermant, C. (1991). Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen Words, Jewish Chronicle. May 17.

[22] Frank, Geyla (1997).

[23] Hertzberg, A. & Hirt-Manheimer, A. (1998). Relax. It’s Okay to be the Chosen People. Reform Judaism. May.

[24] Look Magazine. (1962). January 16.

[25] Begin, M. (1964). The Revolt: The Story of the Irgun. Tel-Aviv: Hadar Pub. p.162.

[26] Badi, J. (1960). Fundamental Laws of the State of Israel. New York. p.156.

[27] Reuters News Service (1998). Israelis Now Hold Worship Services
at Grave of Their Hero, Baruch Goldstein June 17

[28] New York Journal American (1949). February 3.

[29] Andelman, M.S. (1974). To Eliminate the Opiate. New York-Tel Aviv: Zahavia. Ltd. 26

[30] U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American Expeditionary Forces, June 9.

[31] U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American Expeditionary Forces, June 9.

[32] Francis, D. R. (1921). Russia From the American Embassy. New York: C. Scribner’s & Sons. p.214.

[33] Churchill, W. (1920). Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People. Illustrated Sunday Herald. February 8.

[34] Associated Press Online. (1999). Balfour Author Was a Jew.

[35] Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). Backgrounder. Center for Immigration Studies. October.

[36] Rokach, L. (1980). Israel’s Sacred Terrorism. Bellmont, Mass: Assoc. Arab American University Grads.

[37] Bar-Yosef, Avinoam. (1994). The Jews Who Run Clinton’s Court. Maariv. September 2.

[38] Sale, Richard. (2003). Staff Change Means Mideast Policy Shift. UPI article in Washington Times. February 28.

[39] Associated Press. (2003). Moran Forced to Quit Democratic Post. March 14.

For more in depth information of Purim, listen to this radio broadcast by David Duke and read his documented article on it

Listen to this 35 minute in depth audio broadcast  on  The New Purim Massacre Sought in Iran
MP3 stream or Download Here is the link for the new video: The Purim Celebration of  Hate.  Read David Duke’s powerful article: New Purim Massacre Sought in Iran!

…Many of the Jewish extremists are now insanely lobbying for the “nuclear option” against Iran. If these Jewish supremacists have their way and are able to manipulate a catastrophic war against Iran,  they will invent new foods next year, perhaps microwaved meat symbolizing the radiated flesh of Ahmadinejad and the hundreds of thousands of nuclear radiated Iranians.

What better way for Zionists to “express their love of their neighbors than a nice plate of “Haman’s ears.”

This year at the time of Purim, the world needs to know and understand the Jewish extremist hatred that leads us to a horrific war against Iran. We hear constantly about the threat of Muslim extremism. When will we hear about the far greater threat of Jewish extremism that leads the world to Armageddon in Iran. Unless we prevent this act of Jewish hatred and murder, not only will the Iranians  suffer terribly, but so will Americans and people all over the world.

–David Duke

Another Fake Hate Crime

by Jeff Davis

The phenomenon of so-called hate crimes fabricated by the alleged minority “victims” in the form of swastikas or the letters “KKK” scrawled on a door have become so common that it’s a wonder anyone takes these things seriously anymore. Many states have made scrawling racist graffiti on a house or burning a cross on the front lawn the equivalent of a death threat. Whites rarely do these sorts of things to the point that most of the reported incidents of this kind of behavior are actually political theater utilized by ant-Whites.  An endless string of Mexicans, Blacks and Jewish extremists apparently miss the racist graffiti and feel a need to go out and do it themselves so they can have something to scream “racism” about.

The Los Angeles Times reports: “The UC San Diego student reportedly responsible for hanging a noose last week in a campus library issued a public, but anonymous, apology Monday and said she had no racist motivation. The noose’s discovery set off protests at a school that is already tense from recent racially charged episodes and triggered condemnations from UC leaders and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. In a letter published Monday on the front page of the UC San Diego student newspaper, the Guardian, the student wrote that the incident was ‘a mindless act and stupid mistake’ and was not meant to recall the lynching of blacks.’As a minority student who sympathizes with the students that have been affected by the recent issues on campus, I am distraught to know that I have unintentionally added to their pain,’ the student wrote. She was suspended Friday and remains under investigation for a possible hate crime. The letter is signed ‘Anonymous UCSD Student’ and offers no clues about her identity or ethnicity.”

I wonder how she got caught if she sent an anonymous letter. They must have gone through video surveillance recordings and pulled out all the stops or else one of her friends ratted her out. How can she be charged with a hate crime against her own race? Now, that’s a new one even on me.

The article notes “The woman wrote that she and friends had been playing with the rope early last week, making a lasso and then a noose. She said that she took it to the library Tuesday, strung it above a desk and forgot about it. Its discovery Thursday night caused a firestorm on campus, where tensions were high after a Feb. 15 off-campus party that mocked Black History Month. A campus official declined to comment on the letter and said that university police (who apparently have no real crime on campus to contend with) continue to investigate the incident.”

So we are expected to believe that in the midst of a mighty uproar caused by alleged disrespect against Black History Month (which is an historically bogus and artificial celebration to begin with) this young lady of color decides now is the time to start tying nooses for recreation? I detect another fake hate crime. Perhaps she realized the authorities were closing in on her and attempted to diffuse the situation with an anonymous letter, but they got a hold of her and suspended her anyway. Considering how often this sort of thing happens, perhaps one day out of Black History month should be devoted to hate crime fraud.

Inglourious Basterds Video Back Up!

Click here or on the photo to go to the Youtube video.

After a successful appeal, Inglourious Basterds has been restored to my Youtube account.

Google has been complaining about censorship in China. But there is lot of censorship on Google-Youtube by a group of Zionists who flag any video that has effective criticism of Israel.

This video  had over 17,000 views on its first day before taken down. It was number 4 in its favorites list for news and current events. And it had hundreds of 5 star ratings.

Removing it took away the momentum of 17,000 views it got on the first day. We will have to work to restore it as we get closer to the Academy Awards we should use this film and my review to expose the true nature of Hollywood. This film review is an excellent companion to “The Zionist Red Army” video and to my review of Joel Stein’s article in the Los Angeles Times called “Do the Jews Run Hollywood.” These three videos all complement each other and make each of them a stronger case against the dangers of a controlled media. — David Duke.

To watch, click on snapshot to the left or try HERE

In his latest and greatest video yet, Dr. Duke really gives it to Hollywood. He reviews Inglourious Basterds and shows it is a sick hate-film, promoting torture and sadism. As he says, it is bad enough that the film was even made, but the rest of the media gave it great reviews.

Duke exposes Eli Roth who is a co-star who makes sadistic “torture-porn” films. His film Hostel actually got  60 percent positive reviews from Jewish run media.

This is a powerful video that lays bare the evil world, which the Jewish extremists are leading us to.  Be sure to click on drdduke by Dr. Duke’s picture to the right of the video on Youtube and see all of David Duke’s incredible videos –staff!

Rising Unemployment: Obama Blames it on the Weather

by Jeff Davis

The Obama White House and the Democrat Party have been twisting, turning and doing flips like an organ-grinder’s monkey in order to explain the continuing rise in American unemployment. Their latest excuse for the Obama Depression is: Blame it on the weather.

An article from CNN Money.com reports: “The number of Americans filing for initial unemployment insurance surged to just below the 500,000 level last week, and have climbed more than 12% over the past two weeks, the government said Thursday. There were 496,000 initial job claims filed in the week ended Feb. 20, up 22,000 from a revised 474,000 the previous week, the Labor Department said in a weekly report. The prior week, there were 442,000 claims filed. ‘This is certainly not surprising given the very adverse weather conditions for the eastern half of the country, especially in the major population areas,’ said Robert Dye, a senior economist at PNC Financial Services. ‘Weather has a huge impact, particularly with things like construction, which remains very soft. Over the past few weeks, the Northeast, particularly the Washington area, has been hit with snow storms, putting people out of work and resulting in a backlog of claims that the Labor Department wasn’t able to process until this week.’ “

Didn’t the construction industry pretty much get devastated at the start of this financial crisis? Construction always is the first casualty. No one wants to build new houses if they can’t sell them at a substantial profit. Right now, there are about 19 million homes that have been foreclosed and are glutting the market. So how could the snow be affecting non-existent construction in the east?

The snow in the east does not explain rising unemployment in places like California, Texas and Florida. A new excuse will have to be invented for those states.

The CNN Money.com article notes “Excluding the weather’s impact, Dye would have expected initial claims to decline at a healthy rate of 10,000 to 20,000 last week. The government said 4,617,000 people filed continuing claims in the week ended Feb. 13, the most recent data available. That’s up 6,000 from the preceding week’s revised 4,611,000 claims. The 4-week moving average for ongoing claims rose by 4,250 to 4,600,750 from the previous week’s revised 4,596,500.”

I wonder what excuses they will give us in April, May and June as unemployment continues to grow then? The Obama “recovery” is beginning to look like Global Warming. All the recent data argues against it, and there seems to be a preponderance of fraud attempting to prop it up.

Blaming the weather is a bit out there. These people are really reaching to try and explain away with smoke and mirrors something that is absolutely and totally their fault: the continuing destruction of the private sector which actually creates wealth and jobs. The Democrats are going to keep on destroying this country until they are stopped. Replacing this Congress with Republicans in November is only a half measure. They conspired with the Democrats to pass NAFTA and GATT, which paved the way for exporting our factories to the Third World.

The Obama regime is so colossally incompetent and bungling that almost any change would be an improvement. The continuing collapse of the economy will at least ensure one thing: Obama will lose in 2012. A new expression has popped up around the Internet for Obama: OTP –which stands for One Term President.

Chelsea King Murdered by Released Sex Offender

by James Buchanan

An ABC news article reports “Searchers found a body today believed to be 17-year-old San Diego high school student Chelsea King, who went missing when she went for a run in a park near her home last week, the San Diego County sheriff said. Suspect John Albert Gardner is being held on suspicion of murder in the disappearance of Chelsea King… Authorities said he was arrested after a piece of King’s clothing containing DNA evidence was found near the California shoreline in the park where she was last seen jogging. The body was found in a shallow grave 10 feet from the shore of Lake Hodges, San Diego County Sheriff Bill Gore said today at a news conference… The discovery came six days after King went missing on Feb. 25 and two days after police arrested John Albert Gardner III, a convicted sex offender whose DNA they said was found on King’s clothing near where police believe she was abducted. Police said Gardner, who was arrested in 2000 for committing lewd and lascivious acts on a child under 14, may also be connected to the disappearance of Amber DuBois, a 14-year-old who disappeared near San Diego on her way to school in February…. (Gardner) served five years of a six-year prison sentence and was released, even though a psychiatrist told the court that Gardner ‘would be a continued danger to underage girls in the community.’ ….In 2000, Gardner pleaded guilty to committing a forcible lewd act on a 13-year-old girl after she testified that she escaped after he tried to strangle her. “

The John and Ken Show in Los Angeles discussed this case noting that John Albert Gardner committed a brutal sexual assault on a 13 year old whom he lured to his apartment with the promise of watching a movie when he was 21 years old. The girl was beaten on the head and had a red mark on her neck. The victim believes she may have passed out briefly during the assault while Gardner was strangling her. The maximum penalty for a sexual assault on a child is 30 years. The authorities should have charged Gardner with attempted murder for the strangling. The psychiatrist who interviewed Gardner believed that Gardner was in denial that he had done anything wrong. The psychiatrist recommended that Gardner get the maximum 30 year sentence. If that had been done. Chelsea King would still be alive today.

While the people of California support “tough on crime” laws, liberal prosecutors and judges appear to bend over backwards to reduce sentences and let dangerous criminals get lesser sentences in plea bargains. The authorities had rock solid evidence and an eyewitness to John Gardner committing attempted strangulation and a brutal sexual assault on a child. There was absolutely no sane reason to let this man escape with a plea bargain and a five year prison term.

As if giving Gardner a light sentence the first time wasn’t bad enough, the authorities missed another opportunity to do something that could have saved Chelsea King’s life. The ABC article notes “Authorities Monday also linked Gardner to an attack on 23-year-old Candice Moncayo, who identified Gardner from a mug shot as the man who attacked her weeks before along the same running path where King went missing.”

Why couldn’t the authorities identify Gardner earlier after the attempted rape of Candice Moncayo? Isn’t it standard procedure to show women the mug shots of all the sex offenders living in the area where they were attacked? Exactly how many perverts have the authorities let loose into our neighborhoods? The local law enforcement should have at least put up posters along the jogging trail to warn other women that there was a rapist loose in the area, but apparently they couldn’t even do that much.

This is why we need “three strikes” laws and this is why we should never let criminals out of jail even one day early. Liberal prosecutors and judges are constantly making plea bargains –even when they don’t need to and even when they shouldn’t. Certain criminals like child rapists need to be permanently removed from society.

The nation of France used to send their worst criminals to the prison at Devil’s Island. After serving their sentences, many of the prisoners were required to remain in French Guiana. One website notes “On 30 May 1854, a new law provided that convicts would be forced to stay in French Guiana following their release for a time equal to their forced labour time, or, for sentences exceeding eight years, for the remainder of their lives. They were to be provided with land to settle on.”

Perhaps America should have an island in the Pacific for any paroled murderers, rapists or child molesters. Does any sane person want those people being allowed back in normal society?

Hello,  my name is Travis. I was wondering why do you hate jews so much? I’m 17 and christian and studying to become orthodox jewish.  Why are you so hateful? What the hell have jews done to you?  — Travis

From Dr. David Duke:

Dear Travis,

I gather from your email, that you have a real question that may be hidden under your “Why do you hate Jews” question. That question is like a “Why do you hate your wife” question.

I don’t hate Jews, but as do many Jews themselves, I have a real problem with hard-core Judaism and Jewish extremism.

If you just want to rag on me and not understand why I have the opinions that I do, then go ahead and be afraid of learning things which might change your views. I may be wrong about things, but I am willing to put my beliefs at risk, and I do so every day, as I believe that we must go wherever the truth leads!

Travis, you can do what you want, have whatever opinions you want. But I suggest that before you go and devote your life to something, you read both sides of the issue. I mean, really keep an open mind — and read both sides.

If you are intellectually courageous enough I suggest you read some chapters out of my book My Awakening or Jewish Supremacism about Judaism. All my writings are extremely well documented and footnoted. You can also listen to those chapters, as I have them available on mp3. You can read or listen to those chapters absolutely free, though you may want to read them so you can look at the footnotes and check them out.

Here is the introduction to my book Jewish Supremacism.

http://www.davidduke.com/general/1861_1861.html

You will find many quotes by conscientious Jews on the subject as well as my own observations.

Here is the link to some chapters on the Jewish Question from My Awakening.

http://www.davidduke.com/general/my-awakening-table-of-contents_131.html

I suggest you go to the 1st three chapters of Part III The Jewish Question, and read them carefully and think and consider the evidence there very carefully. I also advise you to do your own independent Internet or library research as well.

Here is the link for the audio MP3 version of My Awakening. FREE.

http://www.davidduke.com/general/the-complete-my-awakening-free-audio-edition_9525.html

Years and years of my life has gone into this study. I have talked to thousands of people, from professors to Senators, Prime Ministers,  researchers, scientists, ministers and yes, even rabbis.

Once you look into any of these resources I am providing to you, you are welcome to write me back with any questions you might have. I will try to find time in my busy schedule to answer you. All I ask on your part is that you simply take the time to fully understand a different point of view.

By the way, I also like very much a site run by Jewish intellectuals in Israel called Daat Emet, these scholars expose the hateful, racist, supremacist nature at the core of Judaism. The Jews who do this site are brave men who, although they suffer greatly for their truth-telling, are trying to change path of Israel and Jewish supremacy for the sake of all mankind and for the sake of the Jewish people themselves.

I once had the same opinion on the Jewish question as you do now. I researched it, thought about it, even prayed about it,  and eventually changed my opinions. Speaking out about it has afforded me great difficulties, as the Jewish extremists have great power in media, finance and politics. Sometimes hardship and suffering is the price of freedom and the price of truth. The world is moving very rapidly to my point of view on this important subject.

With respect and good wishes to you,

Sincerely,
Dr. David Duke

David Duke Interviewed by Derek Black

Listen to this Broadcast MP3 Stream, or Download

Great New Radio Interview: David Duke and Derek Black

Listen to this great interview of David Duke by Derek Black on his radio show in West Palm Beach. It really outlines the true positions of David Duke and Derek Black as compared to the biased caricatures of them by the media.