Obama hiding hideous Neocon war crimes

Photographs of alleged prisoner abuse which Barack Obama is attempting to censor — include images of  apparent rape and sexual abuse.

Commentary by David Duke: The following appeared in London’s prestigious Daily Telegraph and graphically describes what the American people and the world won’t see, the hideous torture, including perverted sexual torture of men, women and children in the name of America. Jewish extremists such as Alan Dershowitz (who the Jewish extremist dominated American media describes as a “civil rights” lawyer) has for years advocated the torture of suspects. He and other Jewish extremists in the United States have succeeded in getting our country to emulate the torture policies of Israel. An article by Joel Greenberg in the NY Times ((1993). Israel Rethinks Interrogation of Arabs. New York Times Aug. 14)  casually reports that Israel tortures at least 6,000 palestinians  a year (500 per month) in its dungeons and torture chambers. Now, America under the control of Zionist extremists has adopted the same obscene policies. Obama, who the same Jewish-dominated media has represented as “change we can believe in,” was put into office by the same Jewish extremist media, poltical and financial power structure that controlled the Clinton and Bush years. Obama’s chief of staff is Rahm Emanuel, a Jewish extremist who actually served in the Israeli army. Obama has determined to suppress release of the torture pictures to the American people. He and his Jewish extremist masters dare not let the American people and the world see, to what evils the government has sunk! Obama has recently authorized the contination of the policy to send prisoners to third countries where they face unspeakable tortures on behalf of the U.S. Government. The truth is, that the American people does not endorse torture or rape, so by suppressing release of these pictures, Obama mutes the outrage that would rightfully ensue and force a change in these evil policies. Torture and rape are opposed to every Christian value upon which America was founded. Ironic, isn’t it, that I, a  long protestor of the Iraq Wars and who has always condemned torture and violence against the innocent, one who dares to condemn the Zionist extremist murder, theft and oppression of the Palestinians — am called a “hater and human rights violator” while the media paints President Obama as a man of justice and peace. Perhaps you are able to think for yourself and see that something is seriously wrong with this picture!

By DUNCAN GARDHAM & PAUL CRUICKSHANK

The Daily Telegraph, London Friday, 29 May 2009

‘WE DON’T TORTURE’ — Shown here is one of the milder forms of abuse.

WASHINGTON — At least one picture shows an American soldier apparently raping a female prisoner while another is said to show a male translator raping a male detainee.

Further photographs are said to depict sexual assaults on prisoners with objects including a truncheon, wire and a phosphorescent tube.

Another apparently shows a female prisoner having her clothing forcibly removed to expose her breasts.

Detail of the content emerged from Major General Antonio Taguba, the former army officer who conducted an inquiry into the Abu Ghraib jail in Iraq.

Allegations of rape and abuse were included in his 2004 report but the fact there were photographs was never revealed. He has now confirmed their existence in an interview with The Daily Telegraph.

The graphic nature of some of the images may explain the US president’s attempts to block the release of an estimated 2,000 photographs from prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan despite an earlier promise to allow them to be published.

‘Pictures show torture, abuse, rape and every indecency’

Maj. Gen. Taguba, who retired in January 2007, said he supported the President’s decision, adding: “These pictures show torture, abuse, rape and every indecency.

“I am not sure what purpose their release would serve other than a legal one and the consequence would be to imperil our troops, the only protectors of our foreign policy, when we most need them, and British troops who are trying to build security in Afghanistan.

“The mere description of these pictures is horrendous enough, take my word for it.”

In April, Mr. Obama’s administration said the photographs would be released and it would be “pointless to appeal” against a court judgment in favor of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

But after lobbying from senior military figures, Mr. Obama changed his mind saying they could put the safety of troops at risk.

Earlier this month, he said: “The most direct consequence of releasing them, I believe, would be to inflame anti-American public opinion and to put our troops in greater danger.”

Obama reluctant to release ‘not particularly sensational’ photos

It was thought the images were similar to those leaked five years ago, which showed naked and bloody prisoners being intimidated by dogs, dragged around on a leash, piled into a human pyramid

and hooded and attached to wires.

Mr. Obama seemed to reinforce that view by adding: “I want to emphasize that these photos that were requested in this case are not particularly sensational, especially when compared to the

painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib.”

The latest photographs relate to 400 cases of alleged abuse between 2001 and 2005 in Abu Ghraib and six other prisons. Mr. Obama said the individuals involved had been “identified, and appropriate actions” taken.

Maj. Gen. Taguba’s internal inquiry into the abuse at Abu Ghraib, included sworn statements by 13 detainees, which, he said in the report, he found “credible based on the clarity of their statements

and supporting evidence provided by other witnesses.”

‘The kid was hurting very bad’

Among the graphic statements, which were later released under US freedom of information laws, is that of Kasim Mehaddi Hilas in which he says: “I saw [name of a translator] ******* a kid, his age would be about 15 to 18 years.

“The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets. Then when I heard screaming I climbed the door because on top it wasn’t covered and I saw [name] who was wearing the

military uniform, putting his **** in the little kid’s *** …. and the female soldier was taking pictures.”

The translator was an American Egyptian who is now the subject of a civil court case in the US.

Three detainees, including the alleged victim, refer to the use of a phosphorescent tube in the sexual abuse and another to the use of wire, while the victim also refers to part of a policeman’s “stick” all of which were apparently photographed.