Introductory Commentary by David Duke – The main co-star of Inglourious Basterds, Eli Roth, is shown holding the baseball bat that he uses to bash out the brains of captured (and defenseless) German soldiers. Roth joyously calls this Weinstein Bros. production that glorifies torture, sadism, scalping and burning alive of Germans as “Jewish Porn” and “orgiastic.” Roth’s previous claim to fame were his movies Cabin Fever and Hostel, both of which promoted extreme sexual sadism and torture against both women and men, including the graphic cutting off of sexual organs. Ironically, Basterds centers around a supposed evil film of the Nazis, but the Nazis never made a single film glorifying sadism and torture, yet Jewish Hollywood is loaded with such sick fare–so who are the really sick ones here?

The author points out the cover up of Jewish atrocities against innocent German civilians in postwar Poland, but he could have shown the long Jewish extremist history of sadistic evil. One could cite the tens of millions of souls in Russia, Eastern Europe and in Germany who were tortured and killed by the Jewish-led Bolsheviks (Solzhenitsyn shows that almost all the leaders of Bolshevism and every one of the six top Gulag administrators were Jews), and one could show the mass torture against German defendants in “War Crime Trials” as documented and exposed by Senator Robert Taft in American Congressional testimony and by American Judge Edward Van Roden. For instance, in the trial of German soldiers accused of war crimes at Dachau in 1949, Judge Van Roden, a member of the Simpson U.S. Army Commission, stated that all but two of the 139 defendants had been tortured and had suffered damage to their testicles “beyond repair.” Could you imagine the international media outrage if Palestinians grabbed 139 Jews and tortured them by way of their sexual organs?

Justice Charles F. Wenersturm, a former member of the Iowa Supreme Court who was a Nuremberg Tribunal judge, resigned in disgust over the sadistic and unprincipled Jews who ran the torture and prosecution of Germans that was called “justice ” in the media.The author points out the murders against Germans exposed by Jewish author John Sack, but he could have also talked about the fact that at least 600 Palestinians are tortured by Israelis each month (6000 per year according to Greenberg in the NY Times). He could have cited the Zionist mass murder and maiming that was inflicted on thousands of women and children in Gaza last year, the mass murder of women and children at Sabra and Shatila, of Qana, and the mass murder; and the terror that has accompanied the ethnic cleansing of Israel’s founding  and the theft of Palestinian land on the West Bank and in East Jerusalem.

This sick, Jewish porn film, one that promotes sadism, torture, murder and bloodlust, is now being promoted and praised by the Jewish-influenced media all over the world. The fact that such a film glorifying torture and sadism would be almost universally praised, is proof of the power that evil Jewish extremists have over our media and mainstream political establishment. I will soon publish my own article on this Jewish porn film, as I feel that exposing this sick film can go a long way in exposing the evil of those who led us to the terrible losses of human life in Iraq and Afghanistan, and who now seek a catastrophic war against Iran. It exposes the evil of the Jewish-dominated Hollywood and media establishment in a way which should make this evil clear to everyone. Once again, by their actions, the Jewish extremists are guilty of everything they accuse the Nazis of, and more!  – David Duke

Fictional film ‘Inglourious Basterds’ hyped while true story of Jewish revenge hidden
Robert Stark

Over the last year or so, there have been countless movies about the Nazis and  the Holocaust, such as the “The Reader,” “Valkyrie,” “Defiance” and “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas.” A popular new film, the “Inglorious Basterds” directed by Quentin Tarantino and produced by the Weinstein brothers is promoted by Hollywood and the press as a fictional tale of a group of Jewish American GI’s led by a redneck Lieutenant played by Brad Pitt, who seek vengeance against the Nazi’s in occupied France during WWII. Throughout the film there are many gruesome scenes of vengeance, including scalpings and torture.

Eli Roth, who plays a leading role in the film as the “Bear Jew”, says that the idea of vengence is “…almost a deep sexual satisfaction of wanting to beat Nazis to death, an orgasmic feeling. My character gets to beat Nazis to death. That’s something I could watch all day. My parents are very strong about Holocaust education.” On a similar note, one of the films producers, Lawrence Bender told Tarantino that “As your producing partner, I thank you, and as a member of the Jewish tribe, I thank you, motherf–ker, because this movie is a f–king Jewish wet dream.”

In the ADL Statement they say that the film “…is an allegory about good and evil and the no-holds barred efforts to defeat the evil personified by Hitler, his henchmen, and his Nazi regime. If only it were true!”

There is no need to come up with a fictional story while there is a true chapter of WWII history most people have no clue about.  A Jewish American Author named John Sack risked his career and even his life to tell the story of Jews who sought revenge in his controversial book  An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945. The story tells of Jews who oversaw prison camps in Poland under the Communist occupations.  According to Sack, they not only sought revenge against German soldiers, but also innocent German and Polish civilians.

Sack states in his book that the revenge included torture and rape of  women and children. Sack estimates 60-80,000 died in these camps. Sack interviewed one survivor named Lola, who was an official at the prison and lost most of her family in the Holocaust. She admitted that they treated the prisoners much worse than she was treated at Auschwitz by the Nazis. Sack said “Lola at Auschwitz wasn’t locked in a room night and day. She wasn’t tortured night after night.” She told Sack: “Thank God, nobody tried to rape us. The Germans weren’t allowed to.” But all of that happened to German girls at Lola’s prison in Gleiwitz”

Solomon Morel who lost most of his family in the holocaust brutally oversaw the prison camp. Morel fled to Israel after the book was published. Israel has refused to extradite Morel to Poland to face war crimes.

Most major publishers refused to publish Sack’s book and major media outlets ignored it once it was published. John Sack was vilified by the Jewish Establishment, such as the Executive Director of the World Jewish Congress.  He was labeled a self-hating Jew and even an anti-Semite. Self Proclaimed fighter of Holocaust Denial, Deborah Lipstadt, stated, on ”the Charlie Rose Show” that Sack was a Neo-Nazi and anti-Semite and told him personally he was worse than a holocaust denier, despite the fact that he shares the mainstream view of the holocaust.

The media and major Jewish organizations were opposed to the book because they perceived it as portraying Jews in a negative light, possibly stirring up anti-semitism and weakening their power to exploit the tragedies committed by the Nazi’s for their own political agenda. However these same organizations are promoting Tarantino’s fictional film.

Sack’s message  from his book was not to promote hatred against Jews.  Instead, the books purpose was to prove that Jews are no different from any other group of people who have suffered from persecution but aren’t immune from committing atrocities against others.

Behind an Eye for An Eye: Revenge, Hate and History by John Sack