Historian blames Himmler, but not Hitler
Writer freed from jail says views have ‘crystallised’ - plans tour

Staff Analysis of the New Views of David Irving —

The Jewish extremist pummeling of David Irving has finally gotten to him. He has been jailed in Austria, lost major book contracts around the world and faced financial and professional ruin. in an effort to placate his persecutors Irving has retreated. He has found a shaky refuge in the foggy world of the most undocumented and and unproven part of the Holocaust story, the so-called Reinhard camps of Sobibor, Treblinka and Belzec. These three camps are alleged to make up more than one-third of the alleged Holocaust six million deaths. They are the camps least investigated, documented and examined. In fact, in the 21 volumes of testimony at the Nuremberg Trials, there is a grand total of 20 minutes of testimony on the alleged crimes at these three camps! Twenty-minutes testimony on the alleged deaths of about two million people.

The Nuremberg testimony on the three camps is by a few uncollaborated witnesses who tell incredibly wild and conflicting stories that strain credibility. Although all the German concentration camps during the war had extensive documentation in Berlin, no document is found about these camps that in any way supports a huge program of mass extermination at them. Nor is there any physical evidence of mass murder at the camps such as thousands of tons of human remains that would be present if allegations of over two million murdered are correct. In late 1945 a Polish judge ordered the area to be dug up to find physical evidence of mass murder for evidence for the Nuremberg Trials, but the excavations found the remains of only a few dozen people. (J. Graf and Carlo Mattogono — Treblinka, Extermination or Transit Camp)

The three Reinhard camps have had repeated historical revision even by those alleging that huge mass murders occurred there. In the days after the Second World it was alleged at Nuremberg that Jews at Treblinka were “steamed to death.” That incredulous allegation was later admitted to be completely false and was substituted by the seemingly more plausible allegation of diesel engine gas chambers. The diesel engine stories didn’t begin until 1947. Problem is, as Patrick Buchanan pointed out a few years ago, numerous toxicology studies that diesel engines do not put out enough carbon monoxide to be effective in mass killings, yet that is still the official and approved mainstream version of one-third of the Holocaust.

This lack of physical evidence of remains, even ash or bone fragments of an alleged murdered population larger than that of San Francisco, along with no documentary evidence supporting such a massive and extensive killing program, are two of the main arguments that revisionists use in saying that the Holocaust should be open to study, investigation and analysis in all areas. The contend that simply alleging that the Germans committed this horrendous crime is not enough. History has dramatically revised the death toll and the context of many alleged massacres, such as the Hugenot persecutions in France. They contend that emotionally charged issues need level-headed investigation even more than subjects that have little emotional impact.

Davidduke.com takes no position on the Holocaust other to say that there must be freedom of speech and inquiry on this subject that has so much impact on the modern world. As President Ahmadinejad of Iran has pointed out, the Holocaust as presented is the justification offered for the ethnic cleansing and the many crimes against the Palestinian people and the establishment of the Zionist State of Israel. It is a scandal when people can be imprisoned or essentially blackmailed by threat of financial and professional ruin for researching and questioning even the smallest part of the Holocaust story.

One can clearly see the power of the Jewish extremists to imprison and ruin a world-renouned historian, David Irving. The lesson is clear. Question one iota of the official Holocaust story and the extremists will use any and every means to make you conform to their view.

Seventy-five percent of the writings on the Holocaust story concern Auschwitz and the mythos that surrounds that camp. Perhaps Irving, by continuing to dispute the Auschwitz allegations, but suggesting the Holocaust occurred elswhere — is a round about way to question the entire fabric of the Holocaust tale. No matter what the pressures on Irving, it is despicable that Irving has desperately tried to placate them by his possbile endorsement of the weakest part of the entire Holocaust story. –staff

See links here to onethirdoftheholocaust.com

The Guardian

TEN months ago he was languishing in an Austrian jail, less than halfway through a three-year sentence with his career - and professional reputation - in tatters.

This week David Irving, the discredited British historian who was described by a high court judge [seven years ago] as a Holocaust denier and a racist, says he is launching a comeback with a speaking tour of British cities and a series of new books. “I have kept a low profile for several months because I have had to sort out where to live and to address my financial situation,” said Mr Irving, who was declared bankrupt in 2002 after an unsuccessful libel action over claims he was a Holocaust denier. But now I am ready to start again.”

Mr Irving’s career has been littered with controversy, culminating with his arrest in Austria in 2005. He was sentenced to three years in jail after a judge ruled that two speeches he made in 1989, dismissing the Auschwitz gas chambers as a “fairy tale” and questioning the existence of extermination camps, breached Austrian law. His appeal [on December 20, 2006] was upheld, with the judge saying the crimes were a long time ago and that Mr Irving had undergone an “impeccable conversion”.

However, drinking tea on the sofa of a 10-bedroom house he has begun renting near Windsor, Mr Irving says that his views on the Holocaust have crystallised rather than changed.

He says that he believes the Jews were responsible for what happened to them during the second world war and that the “Jewish problem” was responsible for nearly all the wars of the past 100 years: “The Jews are the architects of their own misfortune, but that is the short version A-Z. Between A-Z there are then 24 other characters in intervening steps.” (…Full Article)

Reference:

The David Irving Saga