Proof of Bald-faced Media Lies about Nick Griffin and David Duke!

Here is the headline and the first few paragraphs of a major news article of The Telegraph in Britain attempting to discredit Nick Griffin and David Duke. The headline reads “GRIFFIN MET US HEAD OF KU KLUX KLAN.” The first sentence of the article reads:

“In 2000 Mr Griffin travelled to a conference in America where he was photographed with Mr Duke who was at the time leader of the Ku Klux Klan.”

That statement is, of course, a blatant lie. Dr. David Duke was not in the Ku Klux Klan in the year 2000, and has not been a member of any Klan organization for over 30 years! There is no mention of the fact that David Duke has always condemned violence, and that he went on to being elected twice to public office in the United States, including winning office as a member of the House of Representatives in Louisiana. There is no mention that in the year 2000 he served as the elected chairman of the Republican Party in the largest Republican district in Louisiana, and that Duke received significant votes in a number of Republican primaries for President of the United States.

An honest article by The Telegraph would read that Nick Griffin was a speaker at a meeting in 2000 along with former Representative, David Duke, who was then an elected leader of the Republican Party. The truth doesn’t sound nearly as threatening, does it?

The article says that the meeting was attended by James Von Brunn, a notorious individua,l who was charged with a shooting at the Holocaust Museum, and then it says, that “Nick Griffin shared a platform with them” [Duke and Brunn].

Another blatant lie!

In fact the large meeting was not sponsored by either Duke or Griffin and was open to the public. Mr. Brunn did not share any platform with Dr. Duke or with current EU Parliamentarian, Nick Griffin.

After telling the readers that David Duke was leader of the KKK in 2000 the Telegraph article goes on to imply that David Duke supported violence and terrorism. It makes no effort to point out that there were many completely separate organizations called the KKK with viewpoints that differ as much as differing Christian or Muslim organizations. The Telegraph states:

“Their avowed purpose is to protect the rights of and further the interests of white Americans by violence and intimidation.

Another blatant lie.

The avowed purpose of David Duke’s organization was NON-VIOLENT, political activism. All of David Duke’s speeches and writings from that period are available for anyone’s inspection. David Duke’s “avowed purpose was not to protect the interests of White Americans by violence and intimidation,” but in fact, he has always forthrightly condemned any kind of violence and intimidation. Anyone can hear his speeches from the time and read his words on the subject. David Duke even incorporated a condemnation and prohibition of violence into the membership oath of his organization. Even the mainstream media of the time admitted the non-violent nature of his organization.

The article goes on to lie again.

They used to wear white costumes of robes, masks, and conical hats. The KKK has a record of using terrorism, violence, and lynching to murder and oppress African Americans, Jews, Roman Catholics and other minorities such as homosexuals.

The implication is that David Duke supported terrorism or violence, was a terrorist or led a terrorist group. In fact, not a single member of David Duke’s organization was ever charged or even accused of a violent, illegal act. In fact, David Duke went on to win over 65 percent of the European American popular vote in Lousiana to represent its people as US Senator and Governor. A higher vote total than almost any British politician, and certainly one that wouldn’t have been won if there was any taint of violence against him.

The article also says that David Duke denies the Holocaust. In fact, what David Duke says is that free speech and freedom of conscience are the foundation of human rights and that it is a human rights travesty that men and women in Britain and America have been imprisoned for voicing their opinions about historical events. In one more instance, David Duke is on the right side and the moral side, while the Telegraph and other major newspapers have been mostly silent about the jailing of thousands of Europeans for speaking or writing their opinions.

Another Telegraph lie.

It also says by implication that David Duke is anti-Catholic. In fact, his Klan organization’s top religious officer was a Roman Catholic, and David Duke was elected to public office in an 80 percent Catholic district!

Why is the media so anxious to tell outright lies against David Duke and Nick Griffin?

1) David Duke, as a former elected official in the United States, and Nick Griffin, as a current elected official in Britain — pose a real political threat to the establishment. Those who want to see the destruction of our European heritage and freedom know that the ideas of David Duke and Nick Griffin have tremendous support among great numbers of Europeans and European Americans, so they resort to blatant lies to distort their real message.

2) The mainstream media are influenced heavily by Zionists and the Jewish Lobby. David Duke and Nick Griffin  opposed the Iraq War, the Afghan War, and they both oppose the planned catastrophic war in Iran. Currently, only the left has opposed these Israeli-sponsored, Zionist wars. When the conservative and traditionally patriotic working people are also influenced to oppose these wars, it will foil Israel’s war strategies.

That is why there is a never ending hate campaign against David Duke and Nick Griffin, but little exposure of the Jewish supremacist State of Israel.

In fact, the nation that Britain and America support with our tax dollars: Israel, is a state that is exclusively for one heritage and one religion –Jews and Judaism. Politicians in Britain who openly support “Israel as a Jewish State” condemn Britons or Americans who want to simply preserve our trational European heritage and not become an oppressed minority in our own countries.

Here’s a few easily proven facts:

1) Israel is a Jewish Supremacist nation with segregation in housing, settlements, apartment buildings, schools, even whole towns and villages.

2) In Israel it is not legal for a Jew to marry a Gentile. The government will not legally recognize the marriage. Jewish members of the Cohanim or traditional (priest class) are not even allowed to marry a practicing Jew if there is one drop of non-Jewish blood in the fiance’s ancestry. (see ‘Not Jewish Enough to Marry a Cohen’ with a link the Jewish magazine article on Davidduke.com) .

Imagine if someone in the British or American government would propose not to allow the marriage of Gentiles to Jews or say, Whites to Blacks. Why does Israel get such a free pass from the press that most Americans and British are not even aware of it.

3) Israel was created by terrorism and is maintained by constant terrorism, suppression, murder and torture. There is no blood on Nick Griffin’s or David Duke’s hands, but oceans of blood on the hands of Israeli officials who are given the royal treatment in Britain and America.

4) Israel’s immigration policy is far more based on heritage than even religion. Athiest Jews from anywhere in the world can immigrate to Israel and receive huge financial incentives to do so, but Palestinians, who were born in what is now Israel, cannot even return to the homes and fields of their fathers and mothers. What would the Telegraph or any major newpaper in Britain or America say about any person who would suggest that Europeans should be favored in immigration to Great Britain or America? Why so little criticism of Israel?

Deep down, that is why the Telegraph and so many other British newspapers and media sources lie about Nick Griffin and Dr. David Duke. They are aware of the anti-Zionist history of these patriot politicians and they know, that they both have dared to expose the Jewish extremism that thrives not only in Jerusalem but also in London and New York and in the highest halls of our governments.

Their arguments cannot be refuted, so they are left with only one weapon: the lies and filth that has become today’s mass media.