Jonathan Kay on Richard Warman and Canada’s phony-racism industry

By Curt Maynard

The below article appeared for approximately one hour on columnist for the Kanadian National Post, Jonathan Kay’s blog, and then was inexplicably pulled and replaced with a much less important politically correct article that nobody will bother reading, which is exactly what the National Post wants. Incidentally, the two top executives at the National Post, David Asper[*] and Gordon Fisher are both ethnic Jews and hard core Zionists.

What Kay is saying in the article below is that Richard Warman (pictured), an agent of International Jewry was himself behind manipulating the Kanadian government into inacting “hate speech” laws that have since been used in Kanada to completely shut down political dissent, especially when any Jews are involved. Kanadian’s are pretty much able to say and/or write anything they like as long as it’s approved by world Jewry. There is no doubt that Warman would completely agree with the preceding concept. We have our own Warman’s right here in the United States, people like Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League and pseudo-Nazi Bill White, who spends a great deal of his time attempting to incite blacks in various ways, encouraging them to commit acts of violence against White people, in an effort to make “hate crime” laws, with their inevitable “hate speech” provisions more palatable to the average American lemming.

Hate speech can be best defined as “anything Talmudic Jewry doesn’t want to be said.” What the below post proves is that organized Jewry is more than willing to invent a problem in order to “create” laws that will prevent people from exposing its criminal agenda. It also proves that they are not only willing to fabricate evidence against someone in a criminal trial, but actually have already. You see, Kanada has already embraced “hate speech” laws and there are now many Kanadians in prison for nothing more than telling the truth in a country where doing so is a criminal act.

Jonathan Kay on Richard Warman and Canada’s phony-racism industry

Posted: February 18, 2008, 1:14 PM by Jonathan Kay

Canadians now know the precise moment when radical anti-racism became a more powerful sociological toxin than racism itself: 7:55pm EST on Sept. 5, 2003.

That is the date-stamp on a particularly vile posting, left by an anonymous user on the message board of the right-wing web site freedomsite.org, attacking Canada’s first black senator. It read as follows:

“Not only is Canadian Senator Anne Cools a Negro, she is also an immigrant! And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt. She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here before there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced their bullsh*t down our throats. Time to go back to when the women *** imports knew their place … And that place was NOT in public!”

Horrible, shocking stuff. But even more shocking is the identity of the fellow whose electronic fingerprints were all over the message: famed Canadian human-rights lawyer Richard Warman.

Warman is a legend in anti-racism circles. A former member of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, he’s launched countless complaints against right-wing extremists, and won almost all of them. But during proceedings surrounding one of Warman’s 2003-era complaints against freedomsite, the respondents turned the tables. A computer expert named Bernard Klatt did some digging under freedomsite’s back office, and determined that the Cools posting had been made from a computer bearing the IP address 66.185.84.204, the very same address from which Warman had admitted to visiting freedomsite using a different alias.

Other technical details – such as the operating system and Web browser being used – also provided an exact match to Warman. Based on this evidence, Klatt concluded in a recently publicized affidavit, “Richard Warman was the poster of the message headed ‘Cools don’t belong in our Senate.’ ”

Does this mean Warman is a closet bigot? I doubt it. What seems more likely is that – like other anti-racism activists – Warman simply found himself running out of Aryan Nation types to chase around the Internet. And so, under this theory, he decided to just start typing the stuff up on his own computer – and then added these self-authored “racist” postings to his blunderbuss brief against freedomsite. (As Klatt notes, Warman has been accused of perpetrating the same sort of stunts on other right-wing Web sites.) When you’ve got profitable hate-speech cases to prosecute, why wait for some unemployed conspiracy theorist to start raving against immigrants when you can just manufacture the evidence yourself?

Bizarre as this episode may be, it is of a piece with a larger trend – symbolized, south of the border, by the shamefully trumped up case against the Duke University lacrosse team. The anti-racism industry, running out of legitimate hatemongers to go after, has gone rogue in its search for attention and relevance. [In contrast to the fabricated Duke case, consider how the media suppressed the story of the murder of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom AND an article by black columnist Leonard Pitts, an article that essentially told every White man and woman in America that they deserved being victimized by blacks].

It also raises the question: How many other faux-racist frauds are out there? Thanks to Warman, it’s a question I now think about every time a Canadian hate-speech activist or blogger publicizes an email he gets from some whitepower22@hotmail.com or other. These poisonous messages are held up as dramatic proof that there are still plenty of Nazi types out there – and that without hate-speech laws to shut them up, the country’s gays, Jews, Black and Arabs will remain at risk of verbal assault, or worse. But if the pickings are so slim that anti-racists have slid into second careers as fiction writers, what does that say about the scale of the problem? How many of the other examples of “hate” that you see out there are similarly bogus?

The anti-racism industry has become an industry like any other: As the actual need for what its peddling has diminished in this extraordinarily tolerant nation, the industry’s various profiteers and carnival barkers have created myths and exaggerated fears to prop themselves up.

As I’ve written before, this would not be so much a problem if their various speech codes were used merely to prosecute men such as David Ahenakew, Ernst Zundel, Jim Keegstra and the like. But in the post-9/11 era, radical anti-racists are also agitating to shut up sensible people saying sensible things about the war against militant Islam, the defining global struggle of our era. They’re also giving comfort to Islamists who seek to carve out sectarian taboos from our hallowed tradition of free speech. [Obviously our Kanadian reporter isn't all that enlightened, apparently he still supports the persecution/prosecution of truth tellers like Zundel and Ahenakew]. [**]

All of this would be destructive enough on its own. When the censors start churning out the hate speech themselves – that makes them as much a farce as a menace. [Farce was a poor word choice - probably used in an attempt to mitigate what Warman actually did. Criminal is infinitely more accurate. Warman fabricated evidence that was used in the development of laws that have since been utilized to throw innocent poeple in prison. I doubt they'd consider their incareceration a "farce"].

Original source where the article was censored and deleted  HERE

Send Jonathon Kay an email of support, no doubt he’ll need it after being browbeaten by Canadian Jewry over these last few days. You can do so HERE

 
Article Source: Curt Maynard’s New Blog

 
* Dr. William Pierce:

Journalists and Canadians By Dr. William Pierce ADV Broadcast Date: 01-05-2002 http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/ts/010502.ram http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/ts/010502.mp3 Dr. Pierce discusses the sorry state of Free Speech in Canada. There, one man, “Izzy” Asper, owns 60% of Canada’s newspapers and other media outlets. Last month Izzy issued a written directive to his newspapers, instructing them that they must print nothing critical of Israel or of Israeli actions or policies. This policy has caused a group of reporters and writers at the Montreal Gazette to rebel, but there have been no large scale protests.

 
** Paul Fromm:

Free speech isn’t just for journalists and “sensible people”; it’s for everyone, Mr. Kay