Reporter invasion at the EURO conference

The Hateful Face of the Media

Could the deliberate misrepresentations of Whites by the media have something to do with why a gang of five Blacks tortured to death two White college students? Could the constant demonization of Whites, but suppression of their victimization, affect public perceptions and beliefs so strongly that nearly all of the tens of thousands of interracial rape and sexual assault victims in America are White women and their angry perpetrators are Black?

Could these constant malicious endeavors by journalists and the predators who control them have anything to do with why Whites are called “racists” if they speak up for themselves, as well as the extraordinary efforts taken to block First Amendment venues where such words might be shared?

In 1981, when the Polish government declared martial law and overtook the free media, replacing it with their own state-run propaganda, a strange thing happened: the Polish people went out to walk their dogs. This was their silent protest of controlled media. If the Polish refused to watch lies, then why can’t Americans do the same?

There once was a time when journalists put first the interests of public citizens. There once was a time when journalism required adherence to scientific standards of fact verification and independence from faction, including from those of race and ethnicity.

While opinions are allowed in journalism, verifiable facts must come first to protect the public’s interest in being truthfully informed. When it comes to reporting on the political activities of White Nationalists, facts are either manipulated or kicked to the curb, while opinions are shouted. The story of “what happened” doesn’t even make it to air or print.

EURO 2008 is one story that has mostly been fictionalized by mainstream media, drawing out propagandists who hatefully frame Americans of European descent seeking the protection of their rights, freedoms and heritage, as “extremists”, “supremacists” and even “a—holes” (as printed by Memphis Flyer, unsigned by the author). While the first two labels and others like them fall under dishonest acts of reporting, such as sensationalism and libel, the last is clearly malicious intent toward a kind of perverse joy in creating unhappiness, to say the least. In other words, it’s all hate speech. (more…)