WHAT IS “ANTISEMITISM?”
Deconstructing the Psychoanalytic Base

by Chad Powers

“Those who control the present, control the past.”

As the Israeli state increasingly invokes new outrages and atrocities against the Palestinians, in both the name of world Jewry and “democracy,” and as the United States wields now the guiding Zionist hammer against the Muslim and Arab world, the specter of “anti-Semitism” is rising again across the planet. So it is decreed by “anti-Semitic” monitoring organizations across the globe. Media pundits everywhere are standing up, as if on defensive cue, to condemn this increasing “plague” of anti-Jewish hostility. A few of the more courageous public commentators, however, delicately maneuver across nails and egg shells to declare an emphatic separation between rising “anti-Jewish” foment (the declared provenance of Nazis, the KKK, Muslim terrorists, and others virtually insane) and an “anti-Israel” outrage (this realm is considered to be — for a few special critics willing to stick their neck out at all — kosher, if handled very, very carefully).

In either case, whether one dares to criticize Jewry as a collective ideological entity, or whether one more deliberately condemns Israel as a monster state (however incongruously stepping widely around its expressly Jewish foundation, ideology, and infrastructure), for most Jews who monitor public currents about them with their usual microscopes, this critical playing field can only afford the inevitable closure: any critic of Jews or Israel is, at root, however you care to dribble the ball, an “anti-Semite.”

World Jewry, for decades hysterically supporting the racist Jewish nation to ward off any alleged future prospects of another “Holocaust,” finds itself now caught in an uncomfortable moral undertow. Everywhere Jews and Israel are center stage, scurrying to drop drapes and curtains. Contingents of fervent Judeocentric/Zionist activists are found to be guiding U.S. foreign policy, heading Western news media desks, dominating huge aspects of modern art and literature — seemingly everywhere at the helm of modern American culture.

The overwhelming international Jewish dedication to Jewish apartheid in the Middle East, and world Jewry’s funneling of great world resources to this unfortunate scenario, is beginning to pay off for them in unexpectedly unpleasant ways. By Jewish collective choice, Jewry’s moral future and — indeed, fate — is self-chained to the nation that recklessly acts in their collective name. To their gross detriment.

Perhaps the greatest taboo in modern Western culture is criticizing Jews who, as one of the foremost Western power elites, have hewn a powerful ideological network of censorial repression and moral banishment against any it deems to be a foe. This typically means being subject to smears (”You’re a racist,” etc.), slander, libels, threats, and — often enough — the loss of one’s job.

Although it makes the Jewish propaganda task easier when the “anti-Semitic menace” is singularly embodied for public consumption as Adolf Hitler, the historical “anti-Semite” is far from a stick figure caricature. He/she has always traversed the entire political, social, language, class, and geographical spectrum. Some of the world’s most famous “anti-Semites” have even been Jews (Karl Marx, for example. And the Jewish-born philosopher Spinoza was banned from the Jewish community for his hostility to traditional Jewish tenets). There is really very little as a common denominator in the history of anti-Semitism except that a wide variety of people objected to Jewish ideology and behavior. Why, one wonders against today’s Jewish “rational” dictate, would that be?

Until only very, very recently, even criticizing Israel was almost as vehemently repressed as criticizing Jews generally. For decades, ardent supporters of the Judeocentric status quo have been either personally engulfed in the rhetoric of the Jewish martyrology tradition, or harbored fear of punishment as an ideological dissenter.

(more…)

6 million minus 2.5 million equals 6 million

By Andrew Winkler

The numbers of alleged Jewish victims have always wildly varied from scholar to scholar, from as high as 9 million in the French documentary Night and Fog, which has been shown to millions of students woldwide, to as low as 30,000^[1] (out of a total of 69,000) in the official death books. But no matter how high or low the number of victims in the Auschwitz camps, most Holocaust scholars arrive at the same magic six million figure.

Some revisionists suspect that this has more to do with an old Jewish myth according to which six million Jews have to die before the Jewish people can return to Israel.^[2] They also point out that claims similar to the ones made after WWII were made at the end of WWI, suggesting that it is more of a symbolic religious figure. Some revisionists go even as far as suggesting the number has to do with the ‘Satanic’ number 666, referring to allegations of a disproportionally strong Jewish element in Satanic cults.

Our friends over at Nizkor.org, the only Holocaust believers who even bother trying to have something remotely resemblant of a rational debate with revisionists - instead of simply resorting to all sorts of insults or calling for the Kosher Inquisition to punish the heretics with the full force of the law - are struggling to ‘debunk’ the problem of the shrinking number of Auschwitz victims. (more…)