JEWISH WRITERS CLAIM POWERFUL ZIONISTS DROVE USA INTO MID-EAST WAR FOR SAKE OF ISRAEL!

When Congressman James Moran (D-VA) told an audience that leaders of American Jewish groups were pushing America into a war with Iraq, he was denounced as an “anti-Semite” and pressured to resign.

When Syndicated columnist and former Presidential candidate Pat Buchanan accused Jewish neo-conservatives and the US-Israeli lobby of pushing America into a war against Israel’s enemies, he was also widely denounced as an “anti-Semite.”

But what are we to make of the many outspoken Jewish writers, Jewish intellectuals and Jewish activists who have been warning us about the exact same thing? Should we dismiss these Jews as “anti-Semites” or “self-hating Jews”? Following are some very revealing quotes from just a few of these Jewish writers and journalists.

============================================================

Joe Klein, Time Magazine, Time.com, February 5, 2003

“A stronger Israel is very much embedded in the rationale for war with Iraq. It is a part of the argument that dare not speak its name, a fantasy quietly cherished by the neo-conservative faction in the Bush Administration and by many leaders of the American Jewish community.

The fantasy involves a domino theory. The destruction of Saddam’s Iraq will not only remove an enemy of long-standing but will also change the basic power equation in the region. It will send a message to Syria and Iran about the perils of support for Islamic terrorists. It will send a message to the Palestinians too: Democratize and make peace on Israeli terms, or forget about a state of your own.”

Michael Kinsley, Slate Magazine, October 24, 2002

Tariq Aziz has a theory. Saddam Hussein’s deputy told the New York Times this week, “The reason for this warmongering policy toward Iraq is oil and Israel.” Although no one wishes to agree with Tariq Aziz, he has put succinctly what many people in Washington apparently believe.

The lack of public discussion about the role of Israel in the thinking of “President Bush” is easier to understand, but weird nevertheless. It is the proverbial elephant in the room: Everybody sees it, no one mentions it. The reason is obvious and admirable: Neither supporters nor opponents of a war against Iraq wish to evoke the classic anti-Semitic image of the king’s Jewish advisers whispering poison into his ear and betraying the country to foreign interests.

Ari Shavit, Haaretz News Service (Israel), April 5, 2003

“The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.

In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in the town (Washington): the belief in war against Iraq. That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history.” (more…)

Jewish Supremacism: The Big White Rabbit in the Room

By Patrick Grimm

In the delightful Mary Chase play, Harvey, Elwood P. Dowd is seen as the amiable town eccentric. Dowd’s biggest foible in the eyes of the townsfolk is that he has a friend, what most would call an “imaginary friend”, a six foot, one-and-a-half-inch-tall big white rabbit. Dowd spends most of his time frequenting the local bars and drinking with the rabbit, who is a pooka named Harvey. A “pooka” is a friendly spirit who appears in animal form. Dowd continually disrupts his sister Veta Louise Simmons’ social life by showing up at her soirees and introducing her upper crust friends to Harvey, which none of them can see. But she finally has enough of Elwood’s quaintness and takes him out to be committed to a sanitarium, a mental institution, with the misnomer Chumley’s Rest.

As the play progresses and hilarity ensues, we finally come to learn that Harvey is not a figment of Elwood’s drunken imagination, but a real entity that can be seen by several of the other characters as well. Elwood is not crazy or scatter-brained. He can gaze upon the reality that other eyes are unwilling or incapable of seeing.

I only mention this particular play because I am currently starring in it at a local theatre, not as Elwood P. Dowd, but as Doctor Sanderson. While rehearsing one of the scenes recently, I had a revelation. This play is a perfect allegory of what is going on in America. Like Dowd, there are a few of us who can see the truth of the Jewish supremacist influence that is being exercised against our heritage, religion and traditional values. We try to introduce other people to the truth of Jewish supremacism, an ideology that is harming our society and now leads us to disaster in Iraq.

But like Elwood, we are dismissed as crazy for trying to make blind eyes see what is right in the room with them. They won’t see the big white rabbit, the pooka of Zionism. The only difference between Harvey and Jewish extremist power is that Harvey was a mischievous and inoffensive spirit who used his magical powers to make people’s lives better. Yet Zionism has a malevolent nature that is only leading America to increasing war and hatred. (more…)